1 only WAS for many syncbos with differents rfc destinations

hello,
this is my scenario:
<i>i have a WAS installed in 1 only server, that serves the requests for:
1. the syncbo A, that have the rfc destination to sap client of TEST layer;
2. the syncbo B , that have the rfc destination to sap client of PRODUCTION layer;</i>
these 2 syncBos call the same BAPI for getList() abap function ;this getList has as input param the USERID, set as default value, read from miauth syncbo("MESYNCUSER").
my problem is that my request for the syncbo B have not success. my userid is void.
I would like to have your opinione about this (architectural?) problem.
thanks in advance,
eliana

Similar Messages

RFC Exception COMMUNICATION_FAILURE with Message RFC destination RFC does n

Hi all , i did a small application in webdynpro abap by calling BAPI . MY application is when i enter the studentid and click the submit button i shoutl get student details .
but when i'm clicking the submit button i'm gettting the error
"RFC Exception COMMUNICATION_FAILURE with Message RFC destination RFC does not exist. Occurred " can any one help me out.

hi rajeev.....
    i am sure that you would have used service call.
   in service call, in the destination part, you would have given a name. the service call automatically creates a destination in this name. but your user id would not have had that rights. so only you get this error. either use a already existing destination or get the access for that.
---regards,
   alex b justin

My ipod touch 4th gen battery only lasts for 3 hours with wifi and brightness fully down

My ipod touch 4th gen battery life if asful only lasts a maxium of 3 hours with wifi turned off and brightness fully down any suggestions?

You can try restoring the iPod. However, it could be that the battery is going bad.
Apple will exchange your iPod for a refurbished onewith a new battery for $79. They do not fix yours.
Apple - iPod Repair price
A third-party place like the followingwill rplace it for less. Google for more.
iPhone Repair, Service & Parts: iPod Touch, iPad, MacBook Pro Screens
Replace the battery yourself if you are up to it. You can purchace a replacement battery for about $10
iPod Touch Repair – iFixit

Contract release orders only allowed for sche.agreements with dep.condition

hi frnds,
i got this error msg while i try to create a scheduling agreement with ref. to contracts
help me out...
thanks in advance....

Hi
Check whether you have used contract or Contract release order.
Also check the allowed document types for the scheduling agreement.
Thanks/Karthik

Using one azure table storage account for many customers with their own data

I'm developing app that will allow the customers to store their data in azure. However, currently I have no idea how to split accounts of the customers in azure. Yes, I'm just started to read the documentation, but maybe someone can point me to the
right topic?

It seems like it might be worth starting from the general guidance to developing multitenant cloud applications - this resource might help: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff966499.aspx
The patterns covered in this guidance might apply to data storage mechanism chosen for the application - whether it's Azure Storage , Azure SQL DB or else.

Which RFC destination is missing?

On MEREP_SBUILDER, I try to do a "BAPI Wrapper interface checks" for a SyncBO.
I get the error: RFC communication failure: Error when opening an RFC connection".
I look into SM59 and see a lot of RFC (type=3) defined.
So which is missing?
Thanks!

Hi Jennifer,
go to MEREP_PD and open the last tab (SYNCHRONIZER). The table shows you all SyncBOs in the systen and its stae. Well, the RFC is written down there for each SyncBO in column RFC DESTINATION. And this is the one that you need to check. So open SM59 -> ABAP Connectors and you should find the one that was mentioned in MEREP_PD. Open it and do a Connection Test as well as a remote logon.
But: you can ask the BASIS people in your company to suppor tyou there as well - if you tell them the name of the RFC, they are able to find out if it is really a problem there and how to fix it.
Hope that helps!
Regards,
Oliver

Best practice for creating RFC destination entries for 3rd parties(Biztalk)

Hi,
We are on SAP ECC 6 and we have been creating multiple RFC destination entries for the external 3rd party applications such as Biz-talk and others using TCP/IP connection type and sharing the programid.
The RFC connections with IDOC as data flow have been made using Synchronous mode for time critical ones(few) and majority through asynchronous mode for others. The RFC destination entries have been created for many interfaces which have unique RFC destinations with its corresponding ports defined in SAP.
We have both inbound and outbound connectivity.with the large number of RFC destinations being added we wanted to review the same. We wanted to check with others who had encountered similar situation and were keen to learn their experiences.
We also wanted to know if there are any best practices to optimise on number of RFC destinations.
Here were a few suggestions we had in mind to tackle the same.
1. Create unique RFC destinations for every port defined in SAP for external applications as Biztalk for as many connections. ( This would mean one for inbound, one for outbound)
2. Create one single RFC destination entry for the external host/application and the external application receiving the idoc control record to interpret what action to perform at its end.
3. Create RFC destinations based on the modules it links with such as materials management, sales and distribution, warehouse management. This would ensure we can limit the number of RFC to be created and make it simple to understand the flow of data.
I have done checks on SAP best practices website, sap oss notes and help pages but could not get specific information I was after.
I do understand we can have as unlimited number of RFC destinations and maximum connections using appropriate profile parameters for gateway, RFC, client connections, additional app servers.
I would appreciate if you can suggest the best architecture or practice to achieve RFC destinations in an optimized manner.
Thanks in advance
Sam

Not easy to give a perfect answer
1. Create unique RFC destinations for every port defined in SAP for external applications as Biztalk for as many connections. ( This would mean one for inbound, one for outbound)
-> be careful if you have multi cllients ( for example in acceptance) RFC's are client independ but ports are not! you could run in to trouble
2. Create one single RFC destination entry for the external host/application and the external application receiving the idoc control record to interpret what action to perform at its end.
-> could be the best solution... its easier to create partner profiles and the control record will contain the correct partner.
3. Create RFC destinations based on the modules it links with such as materials management, sales and distribution, warehouse management. This would ensure we can limit the number of RFC to be created and make it simple to understand the flow of data.
-> consider this option 2.
We send to you messagebroker with 1 RFC destination , sending multiple idoctypes, different partners , different ports.

Discovery System: Problems with exposing RFC as web service

We have a version 2 discovery system and have successfully implemented the three exercises from the TechEd workshop (Sales Order Distribution, Creating a PO Store Record WS, Adding a New Step to the Procurement Scenario with SAP CAF GP). It seems to work fine except for two issues with the RFC/WS:
1) The RFC, and therefore the WS, always returns an empty string instead of the 'X' that the documentation shows in Step 4.h. We checked the RFC itself and it looks like it has an error with the price field; it always appends a blank to the end of the price string and then errors.
2) The created web service does not show up on the Web Services Navigator page. Since the instructions tell you to save the URL to the WSDL, we can find the web service and test it, but you cannot find it on the Navigator page.
Neither of these problems are huge, but they make me worry that something is not quite right in the Discovery System and we may end up with larger problems later. Any ideas what could cause these two problems, and how to fix them?
Thanks, Eric
Message was edited by:
ERIC HAMER

Hi Eric,
First of all let me assure you that your system is perfectly fine and both topics that you have raised are the way the system is suppose to respond.
1. The reason that the service is returning a null is because you are entering the same input parameters more than once. Since some of the parameters are used as primary key's in the database, you will need to change them in order to successfully store the data.
2. The reason that you don't see the service in the Navigator page is because this service resides in the ERP and not in WebAS. Only services deployed on the WebAS will appear in the Web Service Navigator page.
Thanks,
Itai

Make goods receipt for the items w/difference after the proof of delivery

Hello experts,
I do like to know how finish the process of proof of delivery, when I does have items with differences over the quantities that arrived to my client. For example, one sales order for 20 units. I did the delivery note, and posted the goods issue. Then I did the Proof of Delivery, confirming 19 units and the deviation reasons, saving the document. Then I made my billing document for 19 units of material.
The deviation reasons was a damage material, my questions is: How does make goods receipt for the items with difference over the quantities after the confirming of proof of delivery?
Thanks in advance
Edited by: Johnattan Company on Sep 8, 2009 3:45 PM
Edited by: Johnattan Company on Sep 8, 2009 3:59 PM

Hello Chetan,
Thinking in the process, I have found a solution to do it. If the differences was caused by unknowing reasons, like stolen or whatever reasons and the material will not enter again in the warehouse, we donu2019t need to make any process.
But if the causes was a broken material, a lapsed date expired or unknowing others reasons as a consequence the material will enter again in the warehouse; I have customized a returns order, and a returns item with the option not relevant for billing to conclude the process.
Thanks for your help.

Suggestion - App for older Lumias with WP 7.8

Well i like the clarity of playback on this phones (above average) but it would be nice to have an app for lets say only Tone control (Bass, Treble) to better manipulate with the sound. Many random headphones dont reproduce bass very well, and I guess this would help a lot of users to enjoy their music more. EQ would be nice too, but EO in global destroys the overall sound quality, and is a bit more complicated. I think and easy Treble/Bass correction app would be great if thats possible. And you still could make it Nokia Exclusive :-)

no worries mate . well here's how it goes: If you have an unbranded phone, then it is not tied to a network carrier. there are two types of unbranded phone, either a generic regional one, or a Country Variant one. in the case of a generic regional one, e,g. Australia, Nokia will provide the update to those devices. if the device is a Country Variant, then Nokia will provide the update to the local branch of the Nokia, and it is up to say Nokia Australia to APPROVE and release the update with their own customisations (certain apps, country regulations and law settings for things such as camera shutter sounds etc).
if your phone is a branded variant, then Nokia provides the update to the network carrier, and it is up to the network carrier to APPROVE the update or not, with their own custom wallpapers and random shishkebab that they choose to add.
Obviously in both cases, the local Nokia can say they don't want to approve the update, or the network carrier can say that they don't want to provide the update. This has been the case for many years with a lot of devices, not just Nokia's.
However, with the WP 7.8 and WP8 updates, and WP 7.5 before it, it appears Microsoft and its partners such as Nokia have been a lot stricter on network carriers and local branches, for them to actually approve the update and release it to customers. That is why on the announcement of the availability today of the WP 7.8 update, Nokia has stated that it should be available to everyone within three weeks, through both generic and network carrier variants.

HTTP with RFC destination problem

Hi,
We're doing an SAP R/3 --> XI --> External System scenario. We've had no problems making the SAP R/3 to XI work. For XI to External System, we're using the Plain HTTP adapter with an RFC destination. The Server, Intermediate and Root CA of the External System have been already installed on the ABAP layer of XI using the transaction STRUST/STRUSTSSO2 . The Server Certificate and Root CA of XI have also been installed on the External System Server. The problem is that everytime we test the RFC destination, we are still getting an ICM_HTTP_SSL_ERROR
Additional Parameters:
SSL has been enabled on the RFC destination
All three certificates can be found in STRUST
Regards

HI
is the certificate same for both of you have installed external system certificate and external system have PI certificate
Check SAP note 510007
Check similar threads
ICM_HTTP_SSL_ERROR
ICM_HTTP_SSL_ERROR for plain HTTPS with RFC Destination type G
Thanks
Gaurav

Calling Method with RFC Destination

Hi
This is probably a dumb question, but here goes. Is it possible to call a method with a RFC destination ?
Thanks
Jill

hi in your method pass the Destination as importing parameter, adn then you can call rfc in side the method by giving destination.
you can do only this way.
regards
vijay

Communication User Is Enough In RFC Destination Userid-Parameter

Hi Guys,
   I Have The Rquirement Like,i have to call the remote function module which is in quality server from the development system,so for that i have created rfc destination in development system in the logon&security,i have given the userid,which was created by the basis team,this user is a communication user,not a dialog user,with this communication user, iam unable to connect to the system through program
         call function fm1 destination des.
i would like to know whther we can conncet to the system through the communication user,or dialog user is must.please give ur valuble suggestion on this query..
                         thanks in advance...
thanks&regards
   srinivasulu.j

Hi Ranganath,
    Thanks For u r valuble suggestion,with the communication user given in rfc destination ,the connection is not establishing,when i click on test connection button in sm59,it is not showing any error,but when iam trying to execute form the program by calling the remote function module by giving the rfc destination,i checked in debugging,it is not connecting to the other sytem,pls provide some solution for this..
thanks&regards
srinivasulu.j

RFC destination error in posting 3rd party payment in 4.7 FI system

Hi,
We are running in to a problem when we are processing a payment via transaction F110S in our R/3 4.7 system for Financials. We are integrating our Financial system with ECC6.0 for HCM. We receive 3rd party invoice from HCM successfully via ALE and post it in 4.7 system. When we try to process payment against this invoice, apparently 4.7 system is trying to communicate with ECC 6.0 system and issuing an error and the payment processing gets cancelled. It generates a clearing document with out a check.
The error says "An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system HD1CLNT014
    Message no. B1550
Diagnosis
    An RFC destination should be specified for the logical system
    HD1CLNT014. This could not be done in this case. HD1CLNT014 is not your
    local logical system and this system is not included in the relevant
    Customizing tables.
Procedure
    Check:
        -   RFC destination
           -Port definition
         -oubound partner profile of message type SYNCH for this logical system
We checked our configuration for all Logical system and RFC destination and everything seems fine.
Any help in this regard is appreciated.
Thanks
Kesav

Hi David,
Did you check below is set-up correctly.
- Use transaction SM59 to create an RFC destinations for the remote system.
- Use transaction BD54 to create the logical system.
- Use transaction BD97 to link the RFC destination created in SM59 with the logical system created in BD54.
Also, check entries in TBLSYSDEST is filled with correct system name HPQCLNT210. Generally this error occurs when system name is incorrect in TBLSYSDEST.
Thanks,
Ameet

RFC destination error in SM58

Hi,
We are getting an error in SM58 "P85040 does not exist".
What could be the reason for this error in PI system?
When I checked, there is no RFC destination configured with the name P85040. Also there is no communication channel configured with the RFC destination parameter P85040.
Kindlly help.
Thanks,
John

Hi John,
The reason can be the host name you are assigning is not existing.
In RFC destination the host name is for that particular client which is pointing to IP address not to the logical system. You can choose name of RFC destination same as of your logical system.
You can get the host name by login to SAP system and the using MENU ... System->Status and in lower right corner you can find it.
Sachin
Edited by: Sachin Dhingra on Dec 18, 2008 1:18 PM

1 only WAS for many syncbos with differents rfc destinations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for