10/100/1000 Gigabit NIC card

I just got this a few days ago:
Model #: 400-224
Product #: F3D64AA#ABA
Serial #:[edited by Moderator]
Software Build #: 14AM1RRA603#SABA#DABA
Service ID #: 20140511
PCBRAND #: HP
I just upgraded to FiOS Internet Speeds Up to 150 Mbps/65 Mbps...
My speed is only near 90... they recommend getting a 10/100/100 NIC card...
My questions:
what (netword card?) do I have?
Can purchase a NIC card to put into it?
Thanks
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi jojohammer ,
Thank you for visiting the HP Support Forums. I'm sorry to inform you that your post has needed some editing to remove personal information such as the Serial Number in your post. From our Rules of Participation:
Protect privacy - yours and others'. Don't share anything about yourself that you would not want to see on a road-side billboard. Don't post contact or other personal information-your own or anyone else's-or any content that you receive in one-to-one communications without the author's consent. For example, don’t post your computer’s serial # or contact information publicly, and do not allow someone you don’t know to remotely take control of your computer.
If you need people to contact you directly, either ask them to send you a private message or subscribe to the thread so you will be notified when there are replies. You may also click on your name anywhere in the forum and you will be taken to your profile page, where you can find a list of threads you have participated in.
Sharing personal email addresses, telephone numbers, and last names is not allowed for your safety. If you have any questions feel free to send me a private message in reply.
Thank you
George
I work for HP

Similar Messages

Possibility of SD2008 (8-port 10/100/1000 gigabit Switch) Taking down Corp Network

As long as I connect the LAN port going to the Corporate Network is there any reason to believe that this model of switch or anything like it could cause havoc with a corporate network?
Also, is there a way to connect Http into this switch (is there anything in there for settings etc...)?
Thanks.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Take two unmanaged switches. Connect two ports of the one switch with two ports of the other switch. You have got a loop.
All ports on the SD2008 are the same. There are no differences between them. The SD2008 probably consists of two 4 port modules internally which is why you see those markings on port 1 and 5. You can connect any port you want to your ADSL router (you have a router I hope). There are no segments. All ports can talk to all other ports.

Installing a nic card

My motherboard ethernet port only goes to 10/100mps.Can I install a 10/100/1000 mps nic card in the pci-e2 slot and will it work.Thanks,Frank

Hi, Yes, please make sure you have a CD which contains driver to go with it OR at least it has instructions how to download driver. Regards.

3560 and 3750 - Question about 10/100/1000 ports

I am researching several Cisco products to recommend to a customer. I was wondering if the 10/100/1000 ports at a 3560 switch, will provide gigabit bandwith on each port or if the bandwidth is shared among several ports. The latter is how a 48 port 10/100/1000 line card would behave on a Cisco 4500 when, depending on the card, the gigabit bandwidth will be shared among 4 or 6 ports at a time.
What about 10/100/1000 ports on a 3750?
Thanks

The new Catalyst switches/modules such as the Catalyst 6500/6000, 4500/4000, 3550, and 2950 support 10/100/1000 Mbps negotiated Ethernet interfaces or ports. These ports work on 10Mbps, 100Mbps, or 1000 Mbps speed based on their connection to the other end. These 10/100/1000Mbps ports can be configured for speed and duplex negotiation in the same way as 10/100 Mbps ports on CatOS or Cisco IOS Software-based switches. Therefore, the configurations given in this document for 10/100Mbps port negotiation applies to 10/100/1000Mbps ports as well.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk214/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094781.shtml

Gigabit Fiber Card compatibility

Could someone tell me if the following configuration will work?
Gigabit Fiber NIC card in server connecting to a Gigabit Switch (Cisco Catalyst-6513 w/ WS-X6516-GBIC module) which connects to the primary 10/100 Switch.
Thanks.

Yes, that will work, but make sure you have the same flavour of Gigabit fiber in the NIC and the GBIC. Usually for a server NIC it will be 1000BaseSX.
Kevin Dorrell
Luxembourg

PCI Gigabit Ethernet Cards

Anyone have experience with PCI gigabit ethernet cards for use with Linux?
What I am looking for is a good one to go in a firewall box (P3 450 MHz) that won't take too much cpu to run it. A good 10/100 ethernet card that uses the tulip driver will saturate the net with very little cpu usage. The $10 TrendNet 10/100/1000 that I have tried saturates the cpu at only 5 MB per sec transfer.

Is there something wrong with the built-in interface
or do you want to trunk/bond interfaces or route
between interfaces?
Just experimenting…
The interface that Apple had in G4 Xserves (Broadcomm
chipset) 64 bit PCI would perhaps be a good buy if
you can find it (available as spare part?).
http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/OSX/osx_networkcards.html
Thanks a lot for the link and the Broadcomm chipset hint.
Meanwhile, I found that the Realtek website features a driver download for Mac OS X 10.4 and Ethernet cards with the 8169S-32 chipset (the one featured by the Digicom card tested).
I think I'll give it a try and let you know how it goes.

3-Com NIC Card Networking Problems on Solaris 10 (x86)

Hi,
I have Solaris 10 OS installed on a PC. I am having trouble getting my machine to ping other machines on the same network. I have executed the following commands:
#ifconfig elxl0 plumb
#ifconfig elxl0 192.168.100.181 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
When I try to ping another machine on the same lan, I don't get a response. I have even did a the sysconfig command and reconfigured my networking and it still does not work. I have tried different network cable as well. I have looked in the master file. I see the driver for my NIC, so I know it is supported by Solaris 10. Can anyone help me?

Here is some more info on my problem and a couple of things I have tried to do to resolve the issue :
I executed the command "prtconf-pv". I found information on my NIC Card, which is a 3-Com 3C905B-TX Etherlink XL 10/100. I found my vendor id - 10b7 and my device id - 9055. I then checked "driver_aliases" file to see if I could find an entry in this file and I did see my vendor id and device id. I would then conclude that Solaris knows my PCI vendor/device-id combination and maps them to elxl driver.
I have also tried a different cable that i know works and still nothing.
I also found from research in Sol. 10 that there is file in addition to hosts, hostname.elxl0, defaultrouter that has to be modifed. That file is ipnodes. I checked the file, and my ip address / hostname is noted in the file. Is it possible I have a bad NIC? I thought about swapping it out for another one that I know works, but it is an onboard NIC. Well, if anyone has and additional info, I would greatly appreciate it.

Setting Up Dual NIC Cards? Benefit?

Hello Everyone,
I know that the Mac Pro line comes with Dual NICs and I was wondering how do I set these up to be useful with my Cable Modem and Router? Can they be used to get more speed or are they used together in some other capacity.
I really appreciate anyones help and expertise.
Many Thanks,
Chris

The normal use of dual nic interfaces would be to run double instances of a given server on disparate IP numbers. Dual NIC's are generally employed in order to attach multiple IP addresses to a single machine.
Another potential use for dual NIC's is internet connection sharing, where your Mac Pro acts as a kind of router; again also this could be used for attaching one NIC to print services and the other NIC for LAN/WAN access.
OK, actually there are a whole bunch of good reasons for dual NIC cards, but 'doubling your bandwidth' is really not one of them. Believe me, unless you are on a direct fiber OC-10 20 foot from your ISP's NOC, then your existing single NIC has 1000 times the bandwidth of your incoming WAN connection.
It is likely possible to interleave dual NIC cards between two machines for bandwith purposes; but if that were going to be the canse, just identify one as "in" and the other as "out" (both machines would have to have dual NIC's to make this mean anything) but again, I honestly do not see a real world use for this...
Message was edited by: psalmsmith

Did I buy the wrong wireless NIC card?

Hello all .... I have a small home network consisting of 3 laptops and 2 desktops ... They were all connected via a WRT54G router with the one desktop farthest away using a wmp11 wireless NIC ..... this particular desktop is approx 75 - 100 ft away from the router ... so far there's been no problems, but that one machine always showed EXCELLENT signal strength (when you'd over the cursor over the little wireless icon in the systray) ....
For some unexplained reason (cause I'm dumb) I decided to purchase a new router, I got the Linksys WRT160N ..... well the machine with the wmp11 wouldn't even boot up any more, let alone communicate with the router. So I ordered a new wireless NIC for it, a wmp600N...which I installed and now at least that machine boots! The machine does connect to my network, and appears to run on the internet fine, however my question is now whenever you check that machines wireless status, it always says signal strengt is "Poor" or "Very Poor". I see now (I don't know why I didn't notice it before) that there is yet another wireless NIC for that router, and am now wondering if I bought the wrong nic card. I'm just wondering why my signal went from always showing EXCELLENT to now showing POOR all the time.
When I first ordered this router off the Linksys site, I remember distinctly specify "RANGE" as one of my requirements, yet when I received it from Linksys the box was clearly marked it was NOT for range.... so I am sorta confused.

I guess I am just concerned as there seems to be so many networks (routers) around here, there is always 7 or 8 connections available on the list of avail networks and I am just concerned about that one machine connecting to the wrong router when it is booted up ....
when I was using the wrt54g, and it always showed "Excellent" and the others always showed poor to very poor (1 or 2 bars) ,,,,,,,
but now with the new router always showing just one or two bars as well on that one machine .... I worry that it may connect to the wrong thing sometime. This wouldn't be such a worry for me IF there were simply an option to set "Connect to this network ONLY" on the nic,
but there isn't, just a "Connect to preffered network IF in range" ..........
Not that it matters here is the whole reason I have these machines and routers on a network is because I am severely disabled with M.S. and getting up and down steps to all my familys machines isn't so easy, and that one machine about 75 feet from me is impossible. So I have them all networked thru the router, and I use a remote control program (called Radmin) to access the various machines from this one laptop.
I am starting to wonder if the fact that nothing will work when this router is on 20mhz bandwith at all, is indicative of some sort of problem with the router itself? That is funny as the wrt54g was 20mhz only I beleive, and it worked perfectly!

Add secondary NIC Card to existing VM

Hi,
I created some of VMs in Azure and four VMs need to have secondary NIC card, How can I add secondary NIC card to existing VM. I found some post that it cannot add NIC card to existing VM and need to add during VM creation, is it true ?
How many NIC card supported per VM ?
thanks
Keith

Hi,
Multi-NIC VMs must be in created in Azure virtual networks. Non-VNet VMs are not supported.
The current release does NOT support adding or removing NICs after a VM is created. Multi-NIC can only be applied when a VM is created.
The vmNICs must be added at the time of virtual machine creation. If you have an existing virtual machine that you want to add vmNICs to, you'll need to delete the virtual machine while keeping the VHDs and then create a new virtual machine using the existing
VHD while adding the new vmNICs as part of the provisioning.
The table below lists the numbers of NICs corresponding to the size of the VMs:
VM Size (Standard SKUs)
NICs (max allowed per VM)
A3, A6, D3, A8, G3, D12 (4-core, except G3, A8)
2
A4, A7, A9, G4, D4, D13 (8-core, except G4, A9)
4
All other sizes at this time
1
In order to Configure Multi-NIC VM, refer to the below mentioned steps:
Select a VM image from Azure VM image gallery:
$image = Get-AzureVMImage -ImageName "a699494373c04fc0bc8f2bb1389d6106__Windows-Server-2012-R2-201408.01-en.us-127GB.vhd"
Create a VM configuration.
$vm = New-AzureVMConfig -Name "MultiNicVM" -InstanceSize "ExtraLarge" -Image $image.ImageName –AvailabilitySetName “MyAVSet”
Create the default administrator login.
Add-AzureProvisioningConfig –VM $vm -Windows -AdminUserName “<YourAdminUID>” -Password “<YourAdminPassword>”
Add additional NICs to the VM configuration. There are several things to note about this:
>> The configuration of the “default” NIC is not set through this cmdlet. Please refer to Step 5.
>>The SubnetName must match one of the subnets in the intended virtual network.
>>The Name parameter must be unique within the same VM, but does not represent the names of the NICs inside the VM.
Add-AzureNetworkInterfaceConfig -Name "Ethernet1" -SubnetName "Midtier"
-StaticVNetIPAddress "10.1.1.111" -VM $vm
Add-AzureNetworkInterfaceConfig -Name "Ethernet2" -SubnetName "Backend"
-StaticVNetIPAddress "10.1.2.222" -VM $vm
Specify the subnet and IP address for the default NIC.
Set-AzureSubnet -SubnetNames "Frontend" -VM $vm
Set-AzureStaticVNetIP -IPAddress "10.1.0.100" -VM $vm
Create the VM your virtual network. Note: The VNet that you specify here must already exist (as mentioned in the prerequisites). The example below specifies a virtual network named “MultiNIC-VNet”.
New-AzureVM -ServiceName "MultiNIC-CS" –VNetName “MultiNIC-VNet” –VM $vm
Hope this helps !
Regards,
Sowmya

NIC card on HCL list, but it's not talking. Why?

Hi, I just finished installing Solaris 10 (11/06) onto my computer. The whole installation installed without errors. Afterwards, I went to the log files and saw that everything seems to have installed OK.
After rebooting, I logged in with the CDE environment. Everything appears normal. I editted my /etc/hosts file accordingly. I hooked up this new Solaris x86 system onto my network. The NIC card is not talking. I can't ping from this new Solaris x86 PC to another system on the existing, working network.
My NIC card is the D-Link DFE-530TX+
This card is on the approved hardward compatibility list.
I have installed Solaris x86 in the past on many PC's without running into this type of problem, until now. Anyone knows what could be causing this problem, or how to know that my NIC card is being recognized by the Solaris x86 system, and how I can make this thing work?
Do you think I need to install additional drivers to make this particular D-Link NIC card work? If so, how do I install it? Thanks in advance.

Is there a NIC that is widely being sold in stores now that will work without needing to install drivers? It would be much easier for me just to go out to the stores and pick up a new NIC.
I live in Silicon Valley, so I can go to stores like Fry's Electronics, Best Buy, MicroCenter, etc.
Also, I already tried using Intel PRO/100 S and the 3COM Etherlink 10/100 PCI (3C905C-TXM). I downloaded a software from SUN, made a bootable CD, and when it scanned my PC, it says that likely my hardware will be compatible with Solaris 10. Yet,
At the beginning of the installing, I see messages like:
Using RPC Bootparams for network configuraton information.
Attempting to configure interface elx10 (or ipbr0)
Skipped interface elx10 (or ipbr0)
Does this mean the NIC won't work?

10/100/1000

I noticed something interesting yesterday and am hoping someone can explain it. When plugging in servers that were hard coded to 100 on gigabit ports the server performance choked. Shouldnt the IOS autonegotiate and provide std 100 service to the server? After switching the server nic to auto it immediately boosted to gigabit and all performance issues were solved.
does this make sense?It previously functioned at 100 very well for a long time.

By doing what you did you created a duplex mismatch.The switch is set as auto unless you set the server as auto it "cannot" autonegotiate the speed and duplex . The switch can sense the speed correctly but cannot sense the duplex unless the other side is auto so it will default to half duplex , so you then have your server hardcoded to 100/full and the switch running 100/half with a collision domain activated. So you have a duplex mismatch which causes all kinds of errors and slow response , retransmissions etc....
You must match both sides on the coding , if the server is hardcode then the switchport must be hardcoded , if its auto then the switchport must be auto also.

Mac Gigabit Ethernet Cards Network Performance

I now have a 1.8ghz CoreDuo MacMini and 2.0ghz MacBook and both have gigabit Ethernet cards in them, based on the Marvell Yukon chipset i believe.
I was wondering upto what speeds people have driven these ethernet cards?
I'm doing some testing using iperf version 2.0.4 but I can't seem to get any more than around 30MB/sec out of the cards.
Is this their limit? Have you managed to get better out of them? If so, how?
Synology have just brought out a NAS box (DS209), that reads and writes at around 60MB/sec, but pretty pointless unless your ethernet card is upto the same speeds.

If your notation is technically correct, you are saying you are getting 30 megabytes per second as your tested speed. That would translate to 240 megabits per second, which is above the old 100 megabits per second limitation. If this is all accurate, then the next question is what cabling and other equipment are you using to connect the two? If the cabling is not Cat6 (category 6) you may not be able to achieve optimal transfer speeds. If you are using a hub, switch, or router which is not gigabit rated, you would have limitations there.

X4450 server and X1027A-Z 10 Gigabit NIC FW upgrade

I have X4450 servers and find I need to upgrade the FW on the X1027A-Z 10 Gigabit NIC adapter to be compatable with the new server. The instructions have two options, one SPARC and one DOS.
"NXGE_X86.EXE
The DOS programming utility for updating firmware on Neptune
based NIC cards. This utility can only be used in the DOS
environment on x86 based systems"
How is this FW upgrade accomplished then on the X4450 (X64) server? I'm running SUSE 10 SP 1 as an OS.
I'm not sure how I can create a DOS environment?
DOS boot disk?
How is this created?

If your Sun system has a floppy drive, then do it that way.
I agree that creating a bootable CD can be problematic.
(I've had many a frustration getting that accomplished.)
If the only usable drive is the optical drive,
then you would seem to have only that method available to you.
(Booting from local media such as floppy or CD is preferrred over some sort of network boot.)
Go back and review the firmware update documentation.
It may have sufficient instructions for you.

Support Redundant NIC cards in a HP server

Hi
I would like to connect a HP server with two NIC cards (for redundancy) to two CISCO 2970 switches.
From the HP site they configured Channel Bonding
[root@sm36s_donald root]# ifconfig -a
bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:38:EE:6C:6F
inet addr:172.23.160.36 Bcast:172.23.160.63 Mask:255.255.255.192
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:563837 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:110645 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:49833329 (47.5 Mb) TX bytes:17943723 (17.1 Mb)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:38:EE:6C:6F
inet addr:172.23.160.36 Bcast:172.23.160.63 Mask:255.255.255.192
UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:563837 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:110645 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:49833329 (47.5 Mb) TX bytes:17943723 (17.1 Mb)
Interrupt:25
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:38:EE:6C:6F
inet addr:172.23.160.36 Bcast:172.23.160.63 Mask:255.255.255.192
UP BROADCAST SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:26
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:8239071 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:8239071 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:670754425 (639.6 Mb) TX bytes:670754425 (639.6 Mb)
What I have to configure from the Cisco switches site in order to avoid ARP problems?
Thank you for your support
Stelios

Stelios,
We have had issues when trying to load balance between the NICs. when in active/active, the virtual MAC reflects in both the connected switch ports, and the packets tend to loop between the ports. There will be a lot of Spanning Tree TCNs generated, which can shoot up the CPU. We had a 4507R with SUP IV, which got loaded to 70% when doing load balancing. when we made it active/standby on the NIC, the CPU came down to 1 %...
so just be careful on this. best way of doing it is active/standby
hope this helps.. all the best.. rate replies if found useful..
Raj

10/100/1000 Gigabit NIC card

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for