10.2.0.4 on OEL x86-64 Upgrade Path Issues

I am performing a new installation of Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control (OEM GC). I want to want to run Oracle Enterprise Manager 10.2.04 on Linux x86-64 - OEL 4 update 5. My installation for OMS and Repository will be on one server. I will install the database separate from the OEM GC installation.
My upgrade path is a full install of Oracle Enterprise Manager 10.2.0.3 followed by patch to 10.2.0.4. I desire to have my databases at 11g so I would have to upgrade 10gR2 database to 11g database as well. My questions are as follows:
1) Linux x86-64 is not supported on 10.2.0.3 according to certify page. Why is OEL 4 update 4,5 not on Certification page for OEM GC?
2) What installation instruction set should I follow for 10.2.0.3 GC on Linux x86-64? Linux x86-64 documentation following RHEL install?
2) Oracle 11g Repository is also not supported on 10.2.0.3. Is it possible (is it supported?) for me to install Oracle Database 11.1.0.6 EE as repository for OEM GC 10.2.0.3 then only patch OEM GC to 10.2.0.4?
Thank you.

There is no direct full installer to 10.2.0.3 Database. Do I need to do the following:
1) Install OEL 4 Update 5 x86_64
2) Meet prerequisites for Oracle Db 10.2.0.1 (x86_64 - only full installer is 10.2.0.1)
3) Patch Db to 10.2.0.2 or 10.2.0.3 (is there a reason for 10.2.0.3)
4) Install OEM GC 10.2.0.3
a) requires 10.1.0.4, 10.1.0.5, 10.2.0.2 or 10.2.0.3 database
b) use ignore system requirements parameter since OEL 4 Update 5 (x86_64) is not supported
5) I am not sure if any patches are required to OS, DB or OEM at this level
6) Patch OEM GC 10.2.0.3 to 10.2.0.4
7) I am not sure if any patches are required to OS, DB or OEM at this level
8) Follow note: 467677.1 replacing OEM GC 10.2.0.1 with my version 10.2.0.3 and upgrade db to 11g
done
Does this look correct? Is there a more efficient way?

Similar Messages

X86 vs x64 socket issue

I created a program to read data from a MulticastSocket and if I run the application explicitly with the x86 version of Java, I have no issues. However, if I run it explicitly with the x64 version, my application starts fine, but I read no data.
Anyone have any idea as to why this would be the case? I know Java should compile both versions to the same byte code, but just to be sure, I compiled with the x64 javac and ran with the x64 java and still nothing. Again, x86 version works fine so it isn't a firewall issue. It didn't work on my 1.6.0_07(x86) and 1.6.0_10(x64) that were installed so to make sure it wasn't a modified path issue, I uninstalled both and installed the x86 and x64 JDKs for 1.6.0_13 and still the same issues.
Any help would be appreciated.
Stephen

sranger wrote:
Well, after some testing, it seems that the while(!ready) {} loop I was doingWas that loop literaly like this:
while (!ready) {
// do nothing
}? If so, then you have two problems:
1.) It's very bad form to do busy waiting (that's what it's called). It wastes CPU time and is generally not a good idea
2.) If "ready" is not declared volatile, then the JVM is perfectly free to optimize away all but the first read accesses to "ready". This way it will never notice if the value changes.
while waiting for a UI element to be created will give the UI element CPU time if running as 32bit but if ran as 64bit, everything stalls.This sounds exactly as if "ready" is not volatile and the 32bit JVM optimized slightly different than the 64bit one.
I added a Thread.sleep(0); in the loop and it started working.A nasty hack. Replace it with a "real" fix, if at all possible.

StarOffice 8 U6 (Solaris 10 x86) problem upgrading to U7

hello all,
i have problem installing the new StarOffice 8 U7 patch (120186-11) on Solaris 10 x86 3/05. my current installation of StarOffice 8 is patched up to U6 (120186-10) and has the "ARCH patch to enable install of >= Update 6" patch 126411-01 installed.
the errors that i get from patchadd are:
Architecture for package SUNWstaroffice-core01 from directory SUNWstaroffice-core01.i in patch 120186-11 differs from the package installed on the system.
<snipped other output>
0 Patch 120186-11 is declared as incompatible by 122365-01, which has already been installed on the system.
any help will be appreciated.
greetings,
Stoyan

hello all,
finally found the solution for this problem. thanks to Willi Burmeister who posted a simiral question and a summary to the sunmanagers mailing list:
this was triggered by bug 6404527. It's a missing blank in the pkginfo file of nearly all
staroffice packages.
here is a quick workaround:
# cd /var/sadm/pkg
# grep -l ": R" */pkginfo | xargs perl -pi'.bak' -e 's/: R/: R/'i am happily running U9 now :P
cheers,
Stoyan

Solaris 10 x86 b63 USB keyboard issue

Hello. I am trying to install Solaris 10 x86 on a Dell Optiplex SX280. The system uses a USB keyboard and mouse. When asked as to the type of installation to perform (1 - Interactive, 2 - JumpStart, 3 - Text Only), I select 1, then the system start booting and the following messages are displayed:
Configuring devices.
Using RPC Bootparams for network configuration information
ioctl (kbd type): Invalid argument
and hangs at this point. The keyboard stops responding so that a power cycle is the only option. Obviously the keyboard is recognized for me to select option 1 above but something happens after that. Any ideas? Thanks.
Viren Patel
Chemistry & Biochemistry
University of Texas at Austin

At the "1 - Interactive, 2 - JumpStart, 3 - Text Only" prompt the BIOS handles the keyboard. This is before the
Solaris kernel is loaded.
After the Solaris kernel is booted, either the Solaris PS/2 keyboard driver or the USB keyboard driver has
to handle the system's keyboard. For your system it's apparently the USB keyboard driver.
I'm not sure what's wrong with this system. You could try to boot into single user mode with verbose
kernel messages enabled. At the "1 - Interactive, 2 - JumpStart, 3 - Text Only" prompt, type
b -vsAre there any (error) messages from Solaris' usb kernel modules? Look for messages from the modules
"ohci", "uhci" or "ehci". ehci is for USB 2.0, while ohci & uhci are for USB 1.1 devices. I guess your
USB keyboard is an USB 1.x device, so you need either a working "ohci" or "uhci" driver for the USB
port where your keyboard is attached.

Solaris 10 x86 shared drive mount issues

I have an XP installation, a recently-installed Solaris 10 x86 partition, and a FAT32 partition shared between them.
The issue is this:
When I have /share mounted (using mount -o rw) and listed in the /etc/vfstab, the super-user owns everything and can write there. No other user can own a file or write anything on that partition. I've been getting a "chown: invalid argument" type message on every attempt.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.

Just an update, I just reloaded the server with Solaris 9 x86 and the same problem on it as well. Now I am not 100% that this card/drive configuration did work on solaris 9 before, maybe it was a different SCSI card.
The server has been loaded with Windows Server and it works ok on that, so I know that the card/drive combination works ok, just not with Solaris.
Any ideas anyone ? Do I need a different SCSI adapter ?

Requirements for Linux OEL 5 before upgrade to r12

We are running Oracle E-Business suites 11.5.10.2 on Linux OEL 5 two node vmware environment. I am asking just Linux patches etc not the Oracle side.
1) -I want to verify Linux server ( dbtier and appstier) requirement like checking openmotif version required kernel patches rpm etc. need relevant document.
2)- Is there any new requirement ?
Thanks

Thanks for your help. I followed your documents and verified that my Linux kernel, gcc librareis, openmotif etc are all meeting the requirement. Now my next step is to start installation and configuration for r12 upgrade. Can you please give me document for that purpose.Oracle E-Business Suite Installation Guide Using Rapid Install
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18727_01/doc.121/e12842/toc.htm
Oracle E-Business Suite Upgrade Guide Release 11i to 12.1
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18727_01/doc.121/e16342/toc.htm
Database Preparation Guidelines for an E-Business Suite Release 12.1.1 Upgrade [ID 761570.1]
Upgrade Advisor: E-Business Suite (EBS) Upgrade from 11.5.10.2 to 12.1.3 [ID 269.1]
R12.1: Oracle Financials Pre-Upgrade Patch - Supplemental List for EBS CUP [ID 1127593.1]
EBS: R12.1 Oracle Financials Recommended Patch Collection (RPC) [ID 954704.1]
Oracle Applications Release Notes, Release 12.1.1 [ID 798258.1]
1) - We are on 11.5.10.2 on Oracle Linux5 two node system, database tier on one side and the rest on other node.
2)- I have already checked the minimum extended support patch level and we are all good.
3)- I am in the middle of OATM process which will be completed in a day. You should be good to go with the upgrade after completing all the tasks above.
Thanks,
Hussein

Sparc to x86 migration passwd file issues?

We're interested in migrating an old Sparc 2.7 system to x86.
Are there going to be any problems just copying the passwd and shadow files to the new system. Migration is easier if I don't have to force a couple thousand users to change passwords all at once.
Tim Myers

It should be fine. If the x86 system will run something other than Solaris 7, make sure that there are not any differences in the entries the system creates.
Richard

Sun one 7 update 3 + solaris 8 -x86 setup crashes..!

Hi
I'm having a wierd problem setting up sun one app server update 3 on solaris 8 x86 platform.
The issue is that when i try running the setup it crashes
======================================
./setup -console
ld.so.1: ./setup: fatal: libCstd.so.1: open failed: No such file or Directory
Killed
======================================
I guess the app server is not fiding some shared object.. so i edited /etc/default/init and added
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib.. but no luck ! I could not find any patch @ sunsolve that addresses this issue ...
The app server was supposed to be for solaris 9-x86. Is it causing the problem ? is there any workaround for this ?
Also does any one know how to remove all the windowing packages from a solaris machine ? I want the machie to be a server with no GUI stuff on it ..

Try collecting and looking into the sequence of all system calls taking place during setup execution with truss:
# truss -o truss.out -feald ./setup -console
There is a good chance that you might notice the reason why the ld is failing on trying to load the libCstd.so.

Couldn't upgrade Solaris 10 x86 from Sun Fire x2200 to Dell Precision Wrkst

Dear Solaris Experts,
I need to clone a Solaris 10 x86 system using a ufsdump backup from the following source & target servers:
Sun Fire x2200 M2 with Quad Core Processor
# /usr/platform/`uname -i`/sbin/prtdiag
System Configuration: Sun Microsystems Sun Fire X2200 M2 with Quad Core Processr
BIOS Configuration: Sun Microsystems S39_3D12 10/06/2008
# uname -a
SunOS old 5.10 Generic_139556-08 i86pc i386 i86pc
to
Dell Precision WorkStation 390
# /usr/platform/`uname -i`/sbin/prtdiag
System Configuration: Dell Inc. Precision Workstation 390
BIOS Configuration: Dell Inc. 2.3.0 05/01/2007
# uname -a
SunOS 5.10 Generic_139556-08 i86pc i386 i86pc
Unfortunately, Solaris kept rebooting (failed to boot) from the restored primary disk (both / & /export/home) even though Grub menu appeared. As a result, I have embarked on the path of upgrading path using the same Solaris 10 Installation Disk (5/09) DVD but failed due to not able to mount / (c0t0d0s0), swap and /export/home (c0t0d0s7).
The source Sun Fire x2200 had two mirrored disks but I am restoring the backups to a single harddisk. Any idea on what step has been missed or that it is not possible to go down this path altogether.
I have tried a number of different reinstallations & restores but have not had much luck still.
Many thanks,
Jack

I should have searched the forums first. This was the solution to my issue....
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10249826

Upgrade the Oracle Apps from 11.5.10.2 from windows 32 bit to R12 OEL 64bit

Hi Frnz,
We are planning to upgrade the Oracle application from 11.5.10.2 from windows 32 bit to Oracle apps R12 OEL 64 bit.
As I go through the Metalink documents and came to know the below Path to proceed with the R12 upgrade for our scenario (2 phase process).
Phase1 - Upgrade in the source windows OS Machine :
1)Upgrade the Database to latest version of 11G R2 (11.2.0.1/11.2.0.2) [if 9.2.0.8 to 11gR2, refer metalink note 881505.1 & 1265268.1]
2)Upgrade Application from 11.5.10.2 to R12.1.1 in windows Machine
3)Upgrade Application from R12.1.1 to R12.1.3 in windows Machine
Phase2 - Migration Process from windows to Linux:
1)Migrate R12.1.3 Application from *32bit windows to OEL 64bit*. (I could not found the exact document for this Cross Platform Migration)
Note:
As per the metalink note, we identified that, Oracle 11.5.10.2 Application will not support for the 64bit Linux.
Reference:
Migrating to Linux with Oracle Applications Release 11i [ID 238276.1]
Migrating Oracle E-Business Suite R12 from Linux 32-bit to Linux 64-bit [ID 471566.1]
Kindly suggest the upgradation Path to upgrade the Oracle application from 11.5.10.2 from windows 32 bit to Oracle apps R12 OEL 64 bit.
Thanks & Regards
Nagarajan P
Oracle Apps DBA
Edited by: user10968783 on Jun 1, 2011 3:39 AM

Kindly suggest the upgradation Path to upgrade the Oracle application from 11.5.10.2 from windows 32 bit to Oracle apps R12 OEL 64 bit.To migrate the R12/11gR2 instance from Windows to Linux, please refer to:
Application Tier Platform Migration with Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 [ID 438086.1]
Export/import process for R12 using 11gR1 or 11gR2 [ID 741818.1]
Using Transportable Database to migrate E-Business Suite R12 Using Oracle Database 10gR2 or 11g [ID 734763.1]
Oracle EBS R12 with Database Tier Only Platform on Oracle Database 11.2.0 [ID 456347.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Segmentation Fault when connecting to SQL*Plus from Applications tier

Hi Everyone -
I am currently in the process of upgrading a client from 11.5.10.2 to 12.1.1 (eventually 12.1.3) on a OEL x86-64 server. I have laid down the software stack and followed all of the requirements as per the Installation manuals and 761566.1. I also have an open SR right now on this issue - but I wanted to see if any of you have ever run into the issue that I am encountering.
When I try to run adadmin/adpatch - I get to the prompt of providing the system user password and the utility simply exits. No errors in adpatch.log or adadmin.log (both are 0 bytes in size).
When I try to connect using SQL*Plus from the applications tier using either:
sqlplus apps/****@SID
sqlplus system/****@SID
I get a Segmentation Fault error. There are also no errors in my alert log file on the database tier. I found this error while attempting to apply the upgrade merge patch.
Has anyone ever seen s Segmentation Fault error? I have search MOS, found a couple of potential solutions - but nothing has solved the issue so far.
Thanks in advance...
Brenna

>
Are you on 11.1.0.5.0? Is this the database version?
No, my database tier is 11.2.0.3 (the database version displayed above was the client version running on the Application Tier.
Who is the owner of the application tier files? If it is applmgr user, please make sure you login as that user and source the application env file before running sqlplus -- Please issue "echo $ORACLE_HOME" and "which sqlplus" and post the output here.
My owner of the application tier is oracle. I have sourced the environment using $APPL_TOP/APPSR12Dev1_******.env
[oracle@****** log]$ echo $ORACLE_HOME
/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2
[oracle@****** log]$ which sqlplus
/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/sqlplus
>
Please relink sqlplus by issuing "$ORACLE_HOME/bin/relink all > relink.txt 2>&1" and check the relink.txt file for any error
A number of errors occur during the relink, here are some of them:
/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/genclntsh
/usr/bin/ld: warning: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file `/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib/libn10.a(nnfgt.o)' is incompatible with i386 output
/usr/bin/ld: warning: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file `/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib/libn10.a(ntcontab.o)' is incompatible with i386 output
/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/bin/genagtsh /u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib/libagtsh.so 1.0
/usr/bin/ld: warning: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file `/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib/libn10.a(nnfgt.o)' is incompatible with i386 output
/usr/bin/ld: warning: i386:x86-64 architecture of input file `/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib/libn10.a(ntcontab.o)' is incompatible with i386 output
/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib/libn10.a(nnfgt.o):(.rodata+0xc8): undefined reference to `nnflboot'
/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib/libn10.a(ntcontab.o):(.data+0x8): undefined reference to `nttini'
/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib/libn10.a(ntcontab.o):(.data+0x28): undefined reference to `ntzini'
/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib/libn10.a(ntcontab.o):(.data+0x68): undefined reference to `ntpini'
/u01/app/oracle/R12Dev1/apps/tech_st/10.1.2/lib/libn10.a(ntcontab.o):(.data+0x88): undefined reference to `ntusini'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Thanks again...

FND_DISABLE_LOOK_AHEAD_LOV not found

Hi All,
I was installing ebs 12.1.3 on OEL x86
I can not find the system profile option
FND_DISABLE_LOOK_AHEAD_LOV.
Thanx
Ayman

Hi Hussein,
Thank you for your replay, I have been checked it again, there is no profile options for this look ahead, and it is not there in Application Developer responsibility.
as this issue is not reported before for Linux x86 platform, I guess that it may be some sort of installation issue, I will try to patch my 12.1.3 and check it again.
Thank you,
Ayman

Adobe 10.01 for Windows Vista. Error C++ Runtime Library.

It keeps appearing and will not let me save or print a PDF document. I have tried uninstalling and reinstalling the program. I have tried going to c:\users[user]\appdata\local and deleting the Adobe file from the local folder and then reinstalling. If the PDF file is in an email, I can download it and then print it. If the PDF file is a form such as an estimate tax return form, nothing happens.
Please help!

Hi all,
I could resolve some of the issues posted here with the fix offered by jeffcoffee under http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1595916&start=285&tstart=0 (However, I still have the R6034 error message. Would be great to have a fix for that too).
This is what he did:
copy the file 'sqlite3.dll'
from 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Apple\Apple Application Support'
to 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Apple\Mobile Device Support'
*In a 32 bit Windows OS remove (x86) from the path.
Another potential dll issue might be: 'libxml2.dll', follow the same copy routine. If the first one does not fix it.

Rule "SQL Server 2012 feature Upgrade" Failed

I am doing an in-place upgrade of SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2 > SQL Server 2012 SP1, both 64-bit, installed on Windows Server 2008 R2.
I ran the SQL Server Upgrade Advisor tool prior to upgrade which reported no issues.
The error I am getting is:
In the detailed.txt log I can see the following:
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: Initializing rule      : SQL Server 2012 Feature Upgrade
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: Rule is will be executed : True
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: Init rule target object: Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SetupExtension.SkuUpgradeRule
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: -- SkuUpgradeRule : Rule 'FeatureUpgradeMatrixCheck' looking for previous version upgrade data for feature package 'sql_as_Cpu64'.
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: -- SkuUpgradeRule : Found feature package 'sql_as_ctp6_Cpu64' with SkuValue=ENTERPRISE (Enterprise) ProductVersion=10.52.4000.0
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: -- SkuUpgradeRule : Rule 'FeatureUpgradeMatrixCheck' found sourceVersion 10.0 and edition ENTERPRISE for feature package 'sql_as_Cpu64'.
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: -- SkuPublicConfigObject : ValidateSkuMatrix checking sku matrix for sourceVersion=10.0 sourceEdition=ENTERPRISE (Enterprise) sourceArchitecture=X64 targetEdition=STANDARD (Standard) targetArchitecture=X64
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: -- SkuPublicConfigObject : ValidateSkuMatrix source and target architecture match.
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: -- SkuPublicConfigObject : ValidateSkuMatrix did not find a match in sku matrix .
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: -- SkuUpgradeRule : Rule 'FeatureUpgradeMatrixCheck' feature package 'sql_as_Cpu64' is blocking upgrade.
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: -- SkuUpgradeRule : Rule 'FeatureUpgradeMatrixCheck' detection result: IsValidFeatureUpgrade=False
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: Evaluating rule        : FeatureUpgradeMatrixCheck
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: Rule running on machine: TAUPE-SERVER
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: Rule evaluation done   : Failed
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: Rule evaluation message: The specified edition upgrade is not supported. For information about supported upgrade paths, see the SQL Server 2012 version and edition upgrade in Books Online.
(11) 2013-12-29 12:28:10 Slp: Send result to channel : RulesEngineNotificationChannel
Prior to upgrade:
From Summary.txt file:
Overall summary:
Final result:                  Passed
Exit code (Decimal):           0
Start time:                    2013-12-29 12:04:28
End time:                      2013-12-29 12:08:02
Requested action:              RunRules
Machine Properties:
Machine name:                  TAUPE-SERVER
Machine processor count:       1
OS version:                    Windows Server 2008 R2
OS service pack:               Service Pack 1
OS region:                     United States
OS language:                   English (United States)
OS architecture:               x64
Process architecture:          64 Bit
OS clustered:                  No
Product features discovered:
Product              Instance             Instance ID
Feature                                  Language
Edition              Version         Clustered
SQL Server 2008 R2   MSSQLSERVER          MSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVER         Database Engine Services
1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0    No
SQL Server 2008 R2   MSSQLSERVER          MSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVER         Full-Text and Semantic Extractions for Search 1033
Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0    No
SQL Server 2008 R2   MSSQLSERVER          MSAS10_50.MSSQLSERVER          Analysis Services
1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0    No
SQL Server 2008 R2   MSSQLSERVER          MSRS10_50.MSSQLSERVER          Reporting Services - Native
1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0    No
SQL Server 2008 R2
Management Tools - Basic                 1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0
No
SQL Server 2008 R2
Management Tools - Complete              1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0
No
SQL Server 2008 R2
Client Tools Connectivity                1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0
No
Package properties:
Description:                   Microsoft SQL Server 2012
ProductName:                   SQL Server 2012
Type:                          RTM
Version:                       11
Installation location:
\\dovekie\drop\TFS2013\SQLServer2012SP1\x64\setup\
Installation edition:          Standard
Slipstream:                    True
User Input Settings:
ACTION:                        RunRules
CONFIGURATIONFILE:
ENU:                           true
FEATURES:
HELP:                          false
IACCEPTSQLSERVERLICENSETERMS: false
INDICATEPROGRESS:              false
INSTANCENAME:                  <empty>
PID:                           *****
QUIET:                         false
QUIETSIMPLE:                   false
RULES:                         GlobalRules
UIMODE:                        Normal
X86:                           false
Configuration file:            C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20131229_120425\ConfigurationFile.ini
Rules with failures:
Global rules:
There are no scenario-specific rules.
Rules report file:               C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20131229_120425\SystemConfigurationCheck_Report.htm
As far as I'm aware, the upgrade path I am following is a supported one, any suggestions will be much appreciated!
Thank you.

Product features discovered:
Product              Instance             Instance ID
Feature                                  Language
Edition              Version         Clustered
SQL Server 2008 R2   MSSQLSERVER          MSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVER         Database Engine Services
1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0    No
SQL Server 2008 R2   MSSQLSERVER          MSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVER         Full-Text and Semantic Extractions for Search 1033
Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0    No
SQL Server 2008 R2   MSSQLSERVER          MSAS10_50.MSSQLSERVER          Analysis Services
1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0    No
SQL Server 2008 R2   MSSQLSERVER          MSRS10_50.MSSQLSERVER          Reporting Services - Native
1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0    No
SQL Server 2008 R2
Management Tools - Basic                 1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0
No
SQL Server 2008 R2
Management Tools - Complete              1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0
No
SQL Server 2008 R2
Client Tools Connectivity                1033                 Enterprise Edition   10.52.4000.0
No
Package properties:
Description:                   Microsoft SQL Server 2012
ProductName:                   SQL Server 2012
Type:                          RTM
Version:                       11
Installation location:
\\dovekie\drop\TFS2013\SQLServer2012SP1\x64\setup\
Installation edition:          Standard
Slipstream:                    True
User Input
Hello ,
You are trying to upgrade to SQL 2012 standard edition which is not supported .you can only upgrade from SQL server 2008 R2 Sp2 Enterprise edition to SQL 2012 Enterprise or business intellgience. see below link for supported upgrade paths
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143393.aspx
If you want to move ahead you should try Side by side approach.Create new SQL server 2012 box and restore backup.
Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

Visual Studio compiling 64 Bit Plugin for InDesign Server CS5

Hello guys,
Again I have a problem compiling 64 bit plugins, but this time in windows environments, the 32 bit compiling works fine (also on 64 bit machines). The first thing I've done was creating a new project configuration for 64 bit environments copying the 32 bit settings. Now I changed the precompiled libraries to use the 64 bit ones and changed the output directories. After that the compilation process completed without errors, but the resource files have not been copied to the output directory (the directory for them has been created, but it remains empty). Adding the created plugin into the servers directory ends up with a server message that the plugin could not be recognized. Have I missed something that is necessary for compiling 64 bit plugins?
I'm using the 64 Bit Developer Version of the indesign server CS5. The operating system is a Windows Server 2008 x64 R2 with Visual Studio 2008.
Thanks!
P.S. a plugin compiled with 32 bit settings (including 32 bit libraries) also works for the 64 bit version of the server, so does it make any difference if I'm using 32 bit or 64 bit libraries?

The libraries were all correct (all using 64-bit). The problem was a pathing issue. libxml2 needs iconv.dll, but it couldn't find the 64-bit version that I built. Once it found it, everything worked correctly.
The funny thing about depends.exe is that it isn't right all the time. For example, if you open one of the 64-bit .aip files that ships with Illustrator (rename it to .dll first), you'll see what I'm talking about. It complains that you're mixing x86 and x64 CPU types, even though you're not.
The program I used to discover my issue is Process Monitor (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645.aspx). I've been using it for years and love it.

10.2.0.4 on OEL x86-64 Upgrade Path Issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for