10.2.0.5 upgrading issue.

Friends -
Please find below information and let me know if anyone went to the same situation. I am in process of upgrading Oracle E-Business Database 10.2.0.3 to 10.2.0.5 on solaris environment.
I am able to install 10.2.0.5 patch (8202632) without any issues and after this i did startup the database using "Startup Upgrade" without any issues.
I am not able to complete pre-upgrade-check sql "@?/rdbms/admin/utlu102i.sql" and it's failing at below SQL Statement:
SELECT name FROM dba_dependencies
START WITH referenced_name IN
'V$_LOCK',
'DBMS_STATS_INTERNAL',
'V$SESSION',
'V$SQLAREA',
'V$SQLAREA_PLAN_HASH',
'V$SQL',
'V$SQLSTATS',
'V$BACKUP_REDOLOG',
'V$PROXY_ARCHIVEDLOG',
'V$DELETED_OBJECT',
'V$MUTEX_SLEEP_HISTORY',
'V$LOGMNR_SESSION',
'V$RECOVERY_FILE_DEST',
'V$FLASH_RECOVERY_AREA_USAGE',
'V$ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY',
'V$BUFFERED_SUBSCRIBERS',
'V$ROLLSTAT',
'V$BACKUP_CORRUPTION',
'V$COPY_CORRUPTION',
'V$XML_AUDIT_TRAIL',
'GV$SESSION',
'GV$DELETED_OBJECT',
'GV$MUTEX_SLEEP_HISTORY',
'GV$LOGMNR_SESSION',
'GV$RECOVERY_FILE_DEST',
'GV$FLASH_RECOVERY_AREA_USAGE',
'GV$ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY',
'GV$BUFFERED_SUBSCRIBERS',
'GV$RESTORE_POINT',
'GV$SGA_TARGET_ADVICE',
'GV$SQL',
'GV$SQLSTATS',
'GV$SQLAREA',
'GV$SQLAREA_PLAN_HASH',
'GV$BACKUP_REDOLOG',
'GV$PROXY_ARCHIVEDLOG',
'GV$SQL_JOIN_FILTER',
'GV$SHARED_SERVER_MONITOR',
'DBMS_RCVMAN',
'GV$ROLLSTAT',
'GV$BACKUP_CORRUPTION',
'GV$COPY_CORRUPTION',
'GV$XML_AUDIT_TRAIL'
) and referenced_type in ('VIEW','PACKAGE')
CONNECT BY
PRIOR name = referenced_name and
PRIOR type = referenced_type
Please let me know if any body went to this situation
Regards
VSH

Pl post EBS related questions in the EBS forums - http://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=3
Depending on your EBS version, you will need to follow the instructions in one of these MOS Docs
Oracle Applications Release 11i with Oracle 10g Release 2 (10.2.0) (Doc ID 362203.1) - See Section 2
Interoperability Notes Oracle EBS 12 with Oracle Database 10gR2 (10.2.0) (Doc ID 812362.1)
HTH
Srini

Similar Messages

  • Upgrade issues OBIEE 10g to 11g along with OBIA upgrade

    Hi,
    I have to upgrade OBIEE 10.1.3.4.1 to OBIEE 11.1.1.5 along with OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5(Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1) at my client location and I have very little knowledge on it. and want to know/have help documents for upgrade.
    And if anyone in the forums involved in upgrade please list the errors/issues occured during upgrade and after upgrade.
    1. OBIEE 10g to 11g upgrade issues??
    2. OBIA OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5 upgrade issues along with 10g to 11g??
    3. Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1 upgrade issues??
    4. DAC upgrade issues??
    any response for my questions is appreciated.
    Thanks
    Jay.
    Edited by: Jay on Apr 11, 2012 9:11 AM

    HI Jay,
    We cannot explained thread list here, If you get any errors plz post me,will try to help out.
    This is oracle document link - This document has given step by step with screen shots upgration for 10g to 11g ,Please refer the below link.
    http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/fmw/bi/bi11115/upgrade/upgrade_to_11g.htm
    http://obieemanu.blogspot.in/2011/05/rpd-upgration-from-10g-to-11g.html
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/upgrade.1111/e10125/ua_command_line.htm#ASMAS149
    Award points it is useful.
    Thanks,
    satya

  • Report generation toolkit upgrade issues

    I have created multiple vi's in that utilize the previous report generation toolkits specifically using the Generate Report Get Data to Modify.vi and the Generate Report Set Modified Data.vi.  Obviously the report reference has now changed in 8.6's version of the report generation toolkit and these vi's do not exist in the 8.6 library anymore.  What vi's do I need to replace these functions with to make this code work.  Can anyone tell me what the work around is to solving this problem.  This is a picture of the code.
    BJD1613
    Lead Test Tools Development Engineer
    Philips Respironics
    Certified LV Architect / Instructor
    Attachments:
    code.JPG ‏92 KB

    Hi BJD1613,
    The Report Generation VIs on the LabVIEW Palettes mutate properly. However, you may run into upgrade issues if VIs distributed with LabVIEW, but not available in the Palettes are used in the code. Hence, I would caution against using them for the same reason.
    In this case, the specific references do exist in the report generation classes; however, since they are private, they cannot be accessed by VIs outside the respective classes. A temporary workaround for now is mentioned in the following KB 4OOCSJ4M Getting References in Report Generation Toolkit 1.1.3 with LabVIEW 8.6.  
    This was reported to R&D (CAR# 123064) for further investigation

  • EHP Upgrade Issue - Java Stack

    Hi,
    Our Source System at NW 7.0 SP13 and we are upgrading the system to EHP1 SP03.
    Upgrade failed at Downtime > DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL phase.
    Error log:
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:                       com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.doExecute(AbstractPhaseType.java:863) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Exception has occurred during the execution of the phase.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:             com.sap.sdt.jspm.unattended.RequestController.addContextInfo(RequestController.java:178) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Deployment of queue sapjup-queue completed with error
    JSPM version is 7.01.3.0.15. Current JSPM log directory is /usr/sap/XPD/JC00/j2ee/JSPM/log/log_2009_09_09_16_09_42.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.createAndLogRapiException(SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.java:698) [Thread[main,5,main]]: The deployment of the queue failed.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.deploy.SAPJupJSPMDeployer.deployList(SAPJupJSPMDeployer.java:68) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Could not execute deployment of stack file /usr/sap/trans/EPS/in/XPD.xml.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:      com.sap.sdt.j2ee.phases.PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.execute(PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.java:519) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Error while executing DeploymentManager phase with action deploySlot. Check the log files for the specified action.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:906) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase UPGRADE/DEPLOYMENT_BASED_UPGRADE/DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL has been completed.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:907) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Start time: 2009/09/09 22:09:42.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:909) [Thread[main,5,main]]: End time: 2009/09/09 22:11:51.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:910) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Duration: 0:02:08.248.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:911) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase status is error.
    I went through the following link , proceeded with option 2, But still getting same error.  
    Portal Upgrade Issue
    Please advise the resolution for the issue I have.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Srinivas
    Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM
    Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM

    Issue resolved

  • Upgrade issues list needed

    Hi,
    We're currently on 4.6b and going to upgrade to ECC6 with unicode I'm trying to compile a list point taken care converting to unicode from ABAP technical point of view. Does anyone have such a list?
    Some points i shortlisted are :
    1) Use GUI_UPLOAD and GUI_DOWNLOAD rather than WS_UPLOAD and WS_DOWNLOAD.
    2) Structures or table headers that contain non-character data need to be identical when moving, comparing, selecting into, updating from, etc.
    3) OPEN DATASET filename IN TEXT MODE FOR INPUT ENCODING DEFAULT.
    I know there are others. Any help would be appreciated.
    aRs

    Check the below links
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=268386&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=263434&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=261051&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=253316&highlight=upgrade+issues

  • Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue

    hello ,
    We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
    externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
    these errors in 3L!
    After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
    application hanging.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated!
    thanks
    suma
    Here is an Excerpt of the log file
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    regards,
    Suma Venkatesh

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkatesh, Suma
    Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:39 PM
    To: '[email protected]'
    Subject: Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue
    hello ,
    We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
    externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
    these errors in 3L!
    After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
    application hanging.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated!
    thanks
    suma
    Here is an Excerpt of the log file
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
    laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
    laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    regards,
    Suma Venkatesh

  • R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login using forms:Please help****urgent

    We have recently upgraded our instance from 11.5.9 to 12.0.4 in Windows 2003 server.
    We are unable to login to forms after upgrade, however we are able access self service responsibilities without any issues.
    We are getting APP-FND-01496 when we access any forms responsibility. We have tried all possible metalink notes with no luck.
    Any help to resolve this issue will be appreciated.

    Duplicate thread ...
    R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help
    Re: R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help

  • ECC 6.0 EHP-4 upgrade Issue in phase MAIN SHDRUN/ALTNTAB FILL were negative

    Hi Basis Expert,
    while doing ECC 6.0 EHP-4 Upgrade in MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL phase we are getting the following issue please help us.
    Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL were negative!
    Last error code set: BATCH JOB RDDNT2MT FAILED: Error(s) found in the log(s), accumulated in "ALTNTFI.ELG".
    We check the shadow instance is up and we can log in to the system. Check ST22 and SM21 notice no error.
    Check the JOB RDDNT2MT (SM37) successfully running and all the job finish without any error.
    Hope anybody can share a bit your experience on this issue. we try search the note and  find the forum but no luck.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    > 2EETG011 "No shadow system""(environment parameter)""auth_shadow_upgrade"
    > 2EETG011 "No shadow system""DB-connect not against shadow tables !"
    >
    It looks from your log that shadow system is not able to connect to database. Please check your shadow system. Check below link as well:
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-basis/ecc-6-upgrade-issue-in-phase-altntab_fill-1556272
    Thanks
    Sunny
    Edited by: Sunny Pahuja on Oct 15, 2010 1:27 PM

  • Upgrade issues list

    Hi All,
    I was wondering if anyone had a list of Upgrade issues (most likely, from ticketting system) to the 5.0 system.
    Thanks

    Hi mark,
    Can u please send me the  upgrade issue list to this email address
    [email protected]

  • IDSM-2 - upgrade issue - 5.x to 6.x

    Hello All,
    I have an issue upgrading the IDSM-2 module I'm playing with.
    It is currently running version 5.0(2).
    The thing is when I try to upgrade the image to the latest 6.x version using the .bin.gz file, I get the follwing error message :
    The filename IPS-IDSM2-K9-sys-1.1-a-6.1-2-E3.bin.gz is not a valid upgrade file type.
    Continue with upgrade? []:
    There is no image file that is not .bin.gz on the download section of the website. Only recovery images have the .pkg extension.
    Does anybody how to troubleshoot this simple(I guess) upgrade issue?
    Regards,
    Thibault.

    You are trying to "upgrade" using a "System Image" (-sys-) file instead of an Upgrade file.
    The upgrade file for the IDSM-2 is the standard upgrade file used across almost all IPS/IDS models:
    IPS-K9-6.1-2-E3.pkg
    It can be downloaded here:
    http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ips6

  • Frustrating Phone Upgrade issue

    We need help with phone upgrade issue we encounter when BestBuy associate process our upgrade. Associate is saying we are not eligible but we have not done any phone upgrade since Jan 2011. Our ATT mobile service was established with BB in 2009 and we only upgraded 2 phones in Jan 2011 thru BB. The only recent change in January 2013 was a change of responsibility between my spouse and me since my company has a better employer discount thru ATT. No change and per ATT, no contract and we should be able to upgrade in any retail store. But BB keeps telling us we have issue with ATT and can do our upgrade only with ATT Corporate Store. Our mobile account is a regular family plan account as originally established with BB and just like any BB customer, have employer's discount attached. I don't understand how BB system communicates with ATT system so it is hard for me to explain to ATT what "error message" BB associate is receiving. It has become so frustrating with BestBuy telling us to check with ATT and then for ATT to tell us that there is no issue at their end. We have been a loyal BB customer with all major appliances bought from them including protection plan. The least they can do is work with their ATT representative to figure out between themselves what the issue is. Here we are willing to give both companies our business with new phones and new contracts and no one can help us out.

    LTGee -
    I am very sorry to hear about this. I am going to send you a Private Message to collect some information from you to see if we can get to the bottom of this. To check your private messages, ensure you are logged into the forum and click on the envelope on the upper right hand side of the forum.
    Thanks!
    Jesus|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • Windows 8.1 upgrade issues on Satellite P870 - PSPLFA

    Hi there,
    For better or worse over the weekend I have downloaded windows 8.1 onto a toshiba laptop (p870 PSPLFA model) that was running windows 8. Video card is NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M 2GB with Optimus + Intel HD Graphics 4000
    http://www.mytoshiba.com.au/support/computers/satellite/p870/psplfa-019001/specifications
    couple of issues:
    (a) I am having a few problems getting windows 8.1 to work properly on this laptop and can't get/find new drivers from the toshiba website to sort out the video card properly.
    Any ideas of how or when I can download video drivers that are suitable for this laptop?
    Not overly keen on uninstalling and rolling back to windows 8 now that I have gone this far...
    I have a call in yesterday with microsoft yesterday that seems to be going nowhere to fix a couple of other things following this upgrade.
    (b) On the windows 8.1 machine my internet connection when running IE11
    now seems a bit flaky and suspect this is a internet explorer 11/windows 8.1 issue (other laptops on my wireless network running windows 7 and XP are working fine and not dropping out as well as can access all the info I can't on the win 8.1 machine) which seems to be a bit of a common issues looking at some other forums and
    (c) I can't download or open files from google docs (screen just freezes most of the way through the download) on the upgraded windows 8.1 machine.
    Any help appreciated,
    Ken

    Hi
    Your notebook belongs to the PSPLFA series. This series was released in Australian
    The same notebook series PSPLFE is available in Europe.
    On the Toshiba EU driver page you will find all Win 8.1 update drivers
    http://www.toshiba.eu/innovation/download_drivers_bios.jsp?service=EU
    _Importnat:_ the Win 8.1 drivers have to be installed in the right order!
    Check the installation instruction which is available in the driver list too and follow exact this order!

  • Remote app upgrade issues..question. help!!!

    I have been using my iPad with the remote app to control my iTunes music that is on my Mac mini in my living room. I have had the same app on my iPod and Iphone where all 3 units could request, communicate and interact with iTunes dj...and we could all promote songs by using the vote feature..which would put the hearts next to a song if folks voted to move the song up the list....well with the Remote app upgrade ..the interface is totally different on the iPad now...than it is on the iPod or phone...much more robust...but what has changed ...or maybe I just can't find it.... Is the ability to vote for songs on my iPad to move the, up the list in iTunes dj...all I can do is delete or play it immediately... Abiltiy to vote is enabled in iTunes... Anybody know how to do this in remote app upgrade?
    Any help?

    Ok, problem not solved.  I don't understand why my ATV3 disappears when sleeping.  I wonder if it has to do with the ethernet only.  I am going to try wi-fi only again and see if this resolves the issue.  Other thoughts are that whenever my iMac is doing a back-up ill behavior occurs - which is the only activity I see that has transpired since all was well.

  • HR - PA upgrade issue (4.6C to ECC6.0)

    dear all,
    we are currently in the process of upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6.0
    and we found this minor issue in the submodule PA:
    using tcode pa20/pa30 we can not see any record of IT0000 Actions using 'overview'
    but the all the detail actions can be displayed..
    the overview (mountain icon) can't show all the records- only happen when we want to overview the infotype IT0000 Actions.
    but all the details that we have recorded in IT0000 Actions, can still be displayed (using spectacle icon)
    this is only happen in IT0000 Actions
    all other infotypes can be overviewed using 'mountain icon' and can be displayed using 'spectacle icon' as normal condition.
    anyone ever gone through the same issue?
    we have updated patch for SAP HR : SP 32 and EA 7.
    the authorization is SAP ALL.
    looking forward to hearing from you.
    best regards,
    dhenny muliawaty (pei pei)

    Hi Abhishek,
    thanks for your reply and your guidance..
    we need more information from you..
    1. how to back up the table, is it right that we need to contact basis and ask our basis guy to back up the tables?
    2. after we do the backup of HR table T512W, before upgrading your HR support package, then we upgrade the support package and after that..
    is it right that we need to restore the table? or that the back up is use to do cross check on the content of the T512W after upgrade?
    V_512W_B                       Valuation Bases                                         
    V_512W_C                       Averages                                                
    V_512W_D                       Processing Classes, Cumulations, and Evaluation Classes 
    V_512W_O                       Complete View T512W                                     
    V_512W_T                       Wage Type Texts                                         
    thanks for informing us that it's a standard practice to backup this table before applying the HR patch to system. how do you know this is a standard practice?
    do you know any other additional standard practices for HR in upgrade project from 4.6C to ECC6.0?? do you have the link of this complete information?
    thank you for your kind attention and support.
    looking forward to hearing from you.
    thanks and best regards,
    dhenny muliawaty (pei pei)

  • SharePoint 2013 Upgrade Issue

    We are running a small farm with one app server and wfe server and sql server and in the process of upgrading SharePoint servers from RTM version 15.0.4420.1017 to SP1. However, app server shows the status of "upgrade required" in Servers in
    Farm in CA. When I run stsadm.exe -o localupgradestatus, the output results on app server are:
    38] content database(s) encountered.
    [0] content database(s) still need upgrade or cannot be upgraded.
    [56] site collection(s) are contained in the content databases.
    [0] site collection(s) still need upgrade.
    [49] other objects encountered, [1] of them still need upgrade or cannot be upgraded.
    Also, logs on app server after running psconfig are 
    PSCONFIG.EXE -cmd upgrade -inplace b2b -force -cmd applicationcontent -install -cmd installfeatures 
    Timestamp              
    Process                                
    TID   Area                          
    Category                      
    EventID Level    
    Message Correlation
    01/14/2015 11:27:07.81 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    INFO SPWebApplication Name=SharePoint - name of the URL
    .... 10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:27:07.81 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    ERROR CanUpgrade [Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebSite] failed.
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:27:07.85 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    INFO SPWebApplication Name=SharePoint - name of the URL....
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:27:07.85 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    ERROR Exception: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:27:07.88 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    INFO SPWebApplication Name=SharePoint - name of the URL....
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:27:07.88 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    ERROR   at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPWebApplication.SetVersionOnIisWebSite(String binaryVersion, String buildVersion, DirectoryInfo di)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPSequence.get_CanUpgrade()
        at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeSession.CanUpgrade(Object o)
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:27:07.90 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxnf
    INFO SPWebApplication Name=SharePoint - name of the URL....
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:27:07.90 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxnf
    ERROR Cannot upgrade [Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebSite].
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:28:06.25 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    INFO No context object
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:28:06.25 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    ERROR CanUpgrade [Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebSite] failed.
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:28:06.28 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    INFO No context object
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:28:06.28 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    ERROR Exception: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:28:06.34 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    INFO No context object
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:28:06.34 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession ajxme
    ERROR   at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPWebApplication.SetVersionOnIisWebSite(String binaryVersion, String buildVersion, DirectoryInfo di)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPSequence.get_CanUpgrade()
        at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeSession.CanUpgrade(Object o)
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:28:06.43 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession aj0ur
    INFO No context object
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    01/14/2015 11:28:06.43 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
    0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
    SPUpgradeSession aj0ur
    ERROR Upgrade Timer job is exiting due to exception: Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeException: Upgrade completed with errors.  Review the upgrade log file located in C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft
    Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\LOGS\Upgrade-20150114-112257-939.log.  The number of errors and warnings is listed at the end of the upgrade log file.     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeSession.CheckPoint()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeSession.LogEnd()
        at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPUpgradeJobDefinition.Execute(Guid targetInstanceId)
    10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
    I checked event logs and ULS logs but find nothing which can help fix this issue ?

    Hi Sharma,
    According to your description, my understanding is that the app server shows "upgrade required" when you upgrade your SharePoint 2013 from RTM to SP1.
    Whether you upgrade your SharePoint on app server from RTM to SP1.
    If not, please install SP1 for your SharePoint on the app server.
    After installing SP1, you need to run SharePoint Product Configuration Wizard.
    Best Regards,
    Wendy
    Wendy Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • EBS 12.1.3 Upgrade issue

    Hi,
    I installed 12.1.1 with the Vision Database on my machines which has a 64 bit Linux 5 update 5 operating system and everything went fine. After that I decided to upgrade to 12.1.3. I installed the following patches in order they are given below :
    1) R12.AD.B.DELTA.3 Patch 9239089
    2) Patch 9239090
    3) Patch 9239095
    4) 9817770:R12.ATG_PF.B POST-R12.ATG_PF.B.DELTA.3CONSOLIDATED PATCH
    5) 9966055:R12.FND.B [TRANSLATED VERSION OF FNDSCSGN NOT LAUNCHED
    The only issues I had was during the compilation of one form library I got an error in Patch 923090 and I said to continue. The patches completed successfully (I think) since I can log into applications. My issue is I have a lot of invalid objects. I tried to manually compile them but failed then followed one of the other threads to run utlrp.sql and utlirp.sql scripts as per (R12.1.1 - Invalid Objects After Patching [ID 1093163.1])
    I have followed that document and tried to run but my invalid count stays the same. Here is the snapshot when I query the database :
    SQL> SELECT COUNT(*), OWNER FROM DBA_OBJECTS WHERE STATUS='INVALID'
    2 GROUP BY OWNER;
    COUNT(*) OWNER
    1 RE
    2 CA
    4 PUBLIC
    1 HERMAN
    228 APPS
    2 FLOWS_010500
    SQL> @$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/utlrp.sql
    TIMESTAMP
    COMP_TIMESTAMP UTLRP_BGN 2012-04-05 07:23:05
    DOC> The following PL/SQL block invokes UTL_RECOMP to recompile invalid
    DOC> objects in the database. Recompilation time is proportional to the
    DOC> number of invalid objects in the database, so this command may take
    DOC> a long time to execute on a database with a large number of invalid
    DOC> objects.
    DOC>
    DOC> Use the following queries to track recompilation progress:
    DOC>
    DOC> 1. Query returning the number of invalid objects remaining. This
    DOC> number should decrease with time.
    DOC> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM obj$ WHERE status IN (4, 5, 6);
    DOC>
    DOC> 2. Query returning the number of objects compiled so far. This number
    DOC> should increase with time.
    DOC> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM UTL_RECOMP_COMPILED;
    DOC>
    DOC> This script automatically chooses serial or parallel recompilation
    DOC> based on the number of CPUs available (parameter cpu_count) multiplied
    DOC> by the number of threads per CPU (parameter parallel_threads_per_cpu).
    DOC> On RAC, this number is added across all RAC nodes.
    DOC>
    DOC> UTL_RECOMP uses DBMS_SCHEDULER to create jobs for parallel
    DOC> recompilation. Jobs are created without instance affinity so that they
    DOC> can migrate across RAC nodes. Use the following queries to verify
    DOC> whether UTL_RECOMP jobs are being created and run correctly:
    DOC>
    DOC> 1. Query showing jobs created by UTL_RECOMP
    DOC> SELECT job_name FROM dba_scheduler_jobs
    DOC> WHERE job_name like 'UTL_RECOMP_SLAVE_%';
    DOC>
    DOC> 2. Query showing UTL_RECOMP jobs that are running
    DOC> SELECT job_name FROM dba_scheduler_running_jobs
    DOC> WHERE job_name like 'UTL_RECOMP_SLAVE_%';
    DOC>#
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    TIMESTAMP
    COMP_TIMESTAMP UTLRP_END 2012-04-05 07:24:29
    DECLARE
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00904: "FALSE": invalid identifier
    ORA-06512: at line 13
    DOC> The following query reports the number of objects that have compiled
    DOC> with errors (objects that compile with errors have status set to 3 in
    DOC> obj$). If the number is higher than expected, please examine the error
    DOC> messages reported with each object (using SHOW ERRORS) to see if they
    DOC> point to system misconfiguration or resource constraints that must be
    DOC> fixed before attempting to recompile these objects.
    DOC>#
    OBJECTS WITH ERRORS
    4
    DOC> The following query reports the number of errors caught during
    DOC> recompilation. If this number is non-zero, please query the error
    DOC> messages in the table UTL_RECOMP_ERRORS to see if any of these errors
    DOC> are due to misconfiguration or resource constraints that must be
    DOC> fixed before objects can compile successfully.
    DOC>#
    ERRORS DURING RECOMPILATION
    4
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    Invoking Ultra Search Install/Upgrade validation procedure VALIDATE_WK
    Ultra Search VALIDATE_WK done with no error
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    However for some reason the job utlrp.sql only shows 4 invalids as shown when I run it. But the number changes once the script is finished and I am not sure why. If I query SELECT COUNT(*) FROM obj$ WHERE status IN (4, 5, 6) now after utlrp.sql has finished running I get the below
    SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM obj$ WHERE status IN (4, 5, 6);
    COUNT(*)
    234
    But if I query the same query while utlrp.sql is running I get a number as low as 10 I have seen but once the script finishes it goes back up. I don't know what to do. I have run autoconfig on both the db and apps tier. Is there anything anyone can suggest me ? I am totally lost on this.
    Thanks..

    Hi I did set the disablefast_validate=TRUE and re-ran only utlrp.sql to re-compile now I have a lot more packages compiled but I still have some invalids. I just want to know can I ignore these and move on or are they important packages / objects in APPS which may impact functionality ?
    below is the results of the invalid objects.
    Thanks
    OWNER,OBJECT_NAME,SUBOBJECT_NAME,OBJECT_ID,DATA_OBJECT_ID,OBJECT_TYPE,CREATED,LAST_DDL_TIME,TIMESTAMP,STATUS,TEMPORARY,GENERATED,SECONDARY,NAMESPACE,EDITION_NAME
    PUBLIC,WWV_FLOW_LIST_OF_VALUES_DATA,,1006661,,SYNONYM,09-FEB-07,09-FEB-07,2007-02-09:00:33:03,INVALID,N,N,N,1,ORA$BASE
    PUBLIC,WWV_FLOW_LISTS_OF_VALUES$,,1006663,,SYNONYM,09-FEB-07,09-FEB-07,2007-02-09:00:33:03,INVALID,N,N,N,1,ORA$BASE
    PUBLIC,WWV_FLOW_GENERIC,,1006687,,SYNONYM,09-FEB-07,09-FEB-07,2007-02-09:00:33:03,INVALID,N,N,N,1,ORA$BASE
    PUBLIC,WWV_FLOW_FIELD_TEMPLATES,,1006699,,SYNONYM,09-FEB-07,09-FEB-07,2007-02-09:00:33:03,INVALID,N,N,N,1,ORA$BASE
    RE,RE_PROFILER,,1207268,0,PACKAGE BODY,17-NOV-04,05-APR-12,2012-04-05:10:52:51,INVALID,N,N,N,2,
    HERMAN,RDT_1,,1713973,1713973,TABLE,18-JAN-06,18-JAN-06,2006-01-18:13:18:02,INVALID,N,N,N,1,
    APPS,XLA_00707_AAD_C_000026_PKG,,2362389,0,PACKAGE BODY,03-AUG-07,05-APR-12,2012-04-05:10:52:52,INVALID,N,N,N,2,
    APPS,XLA_20065_AAD_C_000030_PKG,,2370236,0,PACKAGE BODY,16-AUG-07,05-APR-12,2012-04-05:10:53:05,INVALID,N,N,N,2,
    APPS,FSAH_DUPLICATE_PKG,,2385307,0,PACKAGE BODY,23-AUG-07,05-APR-12,2012-04-05:10:53:08,INVALID,N,N,N,2,
    APPS,XLA_00707_AAD_C_000044_PKG,,2661674,0,PACKAGE BODY,14-JAN-08,05-APR-12,2012-04-05:10:53:08,INVALID,N,N,N,2,
    APPS,MSD_DEM_OBI_DEMANTRA_MV,,3255317,,MATERIALIZED VIEW,09-JUL-08,09-JUL-08,2008-07-09:09:14:28,INVALID,N,N,N,19,
    CA,F,,3260665,3260665,TABLE,24-SEP-08,24-SEP-08,2008-09-24:16:00:14,INVALID,N,N,N,1,
    CA,G,,3260683,3260683,TABLE,24-SEP-08,24-SEP-08,2008-09-24:16:00:15,INVALID,N,N,N,1,

Maybe you are looking for

  • Itunes gives error about 64 bits even after i downloaded 64 bit

    when i wanted to sync my ipod i got an message that i had to download itunes 64 bits, when i did that i wanted to open itunes but then i got an another error that the library.itl wasn't good so itunes still doesn't work. please help me cause i can't

  • Changes to be done in RFUSVB10 (Annual tax reporter)

    Hi , SUB:Changes to be done in RFUSVB10 (Annual tax reporter) to delete two VAT no's in the output XML list . In Programm: RFUSVB10 Annual Tax Report(Belgium)----> on Tape paper After executing the output XML file which has the content with VAT no's

  • Importing selection of images is unnecessarily difficult?

    I've been trying to figure out how to import a selection of images from a card and, so far, it's got me beat. I can see how to select the files (draw a box, command+click, etc) but I can't figure out how to check them. I see the "check all" and "unch

  • Migrating Solaris with out migrating Sun Studio

    HI , Currently we are using sun studio 8 on solaris 8 to compile our application(C++). We are planning to migrate Solaris 8 to solaris 10. Will there be any problems, If we use sun studio 8 on sun solaris 10. Thanks and Regards, Venkat

  • NAC License lost

    Hello Pros, After the CAM and CAS are confgured in OOB mode,the mgmt wants us to change the NAM and NAS IP address.I decided to re-run the setup to assign the different ip address to the boxes but i unfortunately lost the NAC licenses for both CAM,CA