10.5.7. why so CPU intensive on PBG412"?

I just installed 10.5.7 on my PB G4. The CPU appears to be always maxed out, and as a result
my brand new battery which lasted 4hrs under 10.4.11 suddently dropped to just over 1.5 hrs.
Not to mention the computer is now hotter all the time.
Is there a way to moderate the CPU usage of 10.5.7?
Regards

Alfonso wrote:
I just installed 10.5.7 on my PB G4. The CPU appears to be always maxed out, and as a result
my brand new battery which lasted 4hrs under 10.4.11 suddently dropped to just over 1.5 hrs.
Not to mention the computer is now hotter all the time.
Is there a way to moderate the CPU usage of 10.5.7?
Regards
If you just installed Leopard over Tiger, Spotlight will be indexing any and all volumes you have not excluded. This is an energy/CPU intensive process. See if the dot in the center of the spotlight magnifying glass is winkling. If so, it's still indexing.
Run Activity Monitor and look at the top processes.
Or run
top
in the terminal.

Similar Messages

What does cpu intensive mean?

I downloaded free trial of adobe audition 3, when trying to remove vocals to make karaoke song a message came up saying cpu intensive
can anyone please tell me what this means, and the vocals where still there.
Thank you
mimsypoo

Thanks for all the info,
I tried remove vocals from various sources without success,so I guess
this programme isn't any good for what i am trying to do or maybe it,s me.
Thank you Mimsypoo
durin <[email protected]> wrote:
CPU Intensive warnings come up when using effects that are not suited for real-time use. This means it's fine to use the effect on a file where you don't mind waiting a few minutes for it to do its thing, but you wouldn't want to plug the effect into a track and try to remove vocals from a microphone you're singing into. It requires the computer to do too much calculation and it wouldn't be able to keep up.
As for why your vocals were still there, vocal removal is a very complicated procedure, and honestly more often than not, you won't get satisfactory results. When a song is mixed, often the vocal portion is placed in a very specific portion of the stereo field - usually right in the center so that both ears hear it equally. When this is the case, you can usually isolate and remove this portion of the audio if you can determine where in that stereo field it is located. Other songs, however, may spread the vocals out more broadly, process it with several effects that migrate around the stereo field, or even use multiple recordings of the same vocals in different locations. This makes it much more difficult, as close to impossible as can be without fully committing myself, to accurately remove the vocals without affecting a significant portion of the rest of the track.
>

Problem with animation and separate CPU intensive thread.

Hi All,
I'm in the process of writing a Java chess game with a computer AI. I've got everything working except for the animation of the computer making its move. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesnt.
Here's the problem:
After the computer has finished deciding what move to make (CPU intensive - using standard Minimax w/ Alpha Beta pruning), the thread terminates passing the move to the animation thread (implemented using javax.swing.Timer). My delay is set to 50. But the multiple calls to repaint() in the Timer thread all get collapsed into one (they somehow get bunched up) causing a major display glitch!
Sometimes this happens, sometimes it doesnt. I wanted to know if i could write some kind of wait function to wait until the CPU is free to process quick repaint() requests so that my animation can look descent all the time.
Thanks for any help.
jairam at ecf dot utoronto dot ca

In the javax.swing.Timer class is a method called
setCoalesque(boolean) (I think I spelled that wrong, but you will find it)
By default the Timer class does exacltly what you mentioned, it merges multiple events into one when the application is too busy. Call setCoalesque(false) to receive all the events from the Timer.

What is the less CPU intensive method ...

Hi,
With my Apple TV, I can select directly my music library from Apple TV's menu on my television set. I can also choose from iTunes to stream to my Apple TV through AirPlay. Does both method use my computer's CPU the same way ? Is there a method that is less CPU intensive ?
Regards.
Robert Lespérance

In terms of load on your system they are identical.
The only difference is in the first scenario the AppleTV is pulling the content from the Mac (i.e. telling iTunes "give me this track/video/whatever) and in the second scenario the Mac is pushing the content to the AppleTV (i.e "here, AppleTV, display this video/audio/whatever stream").
After the initial negotiation (push vs. pull) the load on the host system is identical - read the file off the disk and transmit it to the AppleTV for playback.

Looking for Mac that can handle CPU intensive apps (Music & Video)

Hi everyone, I am looking to get a new mac in the near future but wanted to know which Desktop mac is best for music and video? I was thinking of the new iMac but not sure if they are powerful enough? I need something that can handle CPU intensive stuff. I will be using it mainly for video editing and music producing

In a nutshell,
Look at the new 27 inch screen iMac models.
Get the fastest optional CPU,
Decide which optional GPU you'd be comfortable with.
Get the base 8 GBs of RAM and then purchase extra, cheaper RAM through third party Mac RAM sellers.
Then add as much RAM as you think you need. The 27 inch screen models can take up to 32 GBs of RAM.
Decide on optional storage sizes.
If you need a CD / DVD optical drive, these are no longer built-in and you will need to budget for a good external optical drive.
Budget for 3-year extended AppleCare warranty service.
In case of reliability issues with the first 5 years of operational life, the iMac will be covered with free warranty service for the first three years.
Good Luck!

Which is more CPU intensive?

Which is more CPU intensive, tracking to an audio track and looping that, or using Logic vitual midi instruments? Plug-ins and automation on audio tracks or Logic virtual midi instruments? Third party plug-ins like Waves or Izatope or Logic plug-ins

A bit hard to answer, as you need to be a little more specific, but generally:
tracking to an audio track and looping that, or using Logic vitual midi instruments?
Depends on the instrument - Ultrabeat or Sculture can be pigs, for example, but generally recording audio tracks (lots of them) will tax your hard disk more than CPU.
Plug-ins and automation on audio tracks or Logic virtual midi instruments
Again, which plugins? Some hardly make a noticeable difference, others like Space Designer can get intense. Automation - very little.
Third party plug-ins like Waves or Izatope
Don't use Waves, but Izotope Ozone 3 is a real hog - but worth every bit of it - I love that plugin.

Debug ip bgp update is cpu-intensive

Hi,
I would like to know if the command in the subject is cpu-intensive or not.
Thank you very much.
Paolo

debugs always use cpu to one extent or another.
debug of bgp updates should not be too impacting unless you continually have tons of updates.
it should be ok to run during production hours if you have very few bgp changes/updates occuring.

Ghosting on cpu intensive app

So I have a Flex app, which can be cpu intensive at times, with some ghosting issues ( see attached image ). I had this issue once before with just IE8 and textfields, but now its happening with everything in the swf and in every browser (Chrome, IE, FF). Even if you let the app sit after loading so the cpu slows down it still happens.
I ran a test when I had the text issue in IE8 (via Alex H.) where I took a bitmap snapshot of the screen from within Flex and it didn't show the ghosting in the bitmap.
I have a feeling this is an issue with the browser refreshing? There is a js call that you can use to force a screen refresh (not the webpage) but that didn't work either. Just wondering if anyone else has run into this issue?
TIA, Jason

Terpstar,
I was wondering if you have had a chance to use Motion yet. I have a MBP, and using Zapfino fonts with SciFi Glow crashes my system every time. I would be interested to see if this is the case on other intel based systems. This has led to a failure of my main logic board twice over the last month. See my thread:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=614641&tstart=25
Also, of the two GB ram I have installed, FCP doesn't seem to utilize more than 100MB of RAM. Although the VM size is several GB for the app. I noticed that in order to utilize both cores on my MBP, Airport had to be turned off.
Also, as Ned Snowing was saying, there is no doubt that there are going to be many software bugs that must be sorted out. Especially since this program is being adapted for intel macs, and not re-written.

Cpu intensive or io intensive

Dear all,
How do i know if a util/programme is cpu intensive or io intensive.
Regards,
Yoonus

Sounds like the same problem I had with my H55 with original BIOS and RAM compatibility. BIOS updates include memory compatibility so it's recommended you update BIOS for that reason. I had an H57M-ED but it came with BIOS 1.3 and didn't have that problem. That being said I prefer the Crucial RAM you see in my signature for the H55/H57 MB's.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148262
Wise decision not trying to flash BIOS yet. Do like Jack said before anything else but I would recommend returning RAM and exchange for Crucial.

Why the CPU Frequency will just stated at 1189MHz when the X230 had AC Power ONLY (Battery Removed)?

Dear All,
I bought a X230 (i7) notebook. I found that if removed the battery from the notebook and only use AC power with the X230 Notenook. The CPU frequency will stated at 1189MHz. It will not change no matter how many program the notebook is running. The CPU frequency will rise to 2.9GHz or upto Turbo when the Notebook with battery or battery and AC power. Why the CPU Frequency will just stated at 1189MHz when the X230 had AC Power ONLY (Battery Removed)? This is not right. Any setting in the X230 Notebook need to change? Please help.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

RichardW wrote:
The situation is probably the same as it was for the X220. A 65W power adapter by itself doesn't provide enough power to run the computer at full speed, but it can when combined with a battery. However the 90W adapter may be able to run the computer at full speed without a battery.
As it was with earler X-series. This is by design. It allows people to travel with the smaller, lighter 65W adapter. However for maximum speed and flexibility it's best to always use the 90W adapter.
Cheers... Dorian Hausman
X1C2, TPT2, T430s, SL500, X61s, T60p, A21p, 770, 760ED... 5160, 5150... S360/30

Why is Mac Pro 2.66 only 1.3x faster than 2.7 G5 on CPU intensive stuff?

I produce DVDs so my Compressor DVCam -> MPEG2 encoding is the most time consuming task. Take the MacWorld benchmarks, I was dissappointed the QC 2.66 was a third faster than a DC 2.7 G5 running Compressor.
I would have expected almost 2x as fast, basically halving encoding times. The Mac Pro took 107s vs G5 137s only 1.28x as fast OR put another way jobs complete in 78% of the time taken for the G5.
This is key reason for me to have just sold a G5 DC 2.3...but I'm dissappointed with these early indicators. Would it be reasonable to assume Apple have not optimised Compressor for Intel - surely not at this late stage?
G4 Dual Gigabit Mac OS X (10.4.7) ATI 9800 Pro

Terpstar,
I was wondering if you have had a chance to use Motion yet. I have a MBP, and using Zapfino fonts with SciFi Glow crashes my system every time. I would be interested to see if this is the case on other intel based systems. This has led to a failure of my main logic board twice over the last month. See my thread:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=614641&tstart=25
Also, of the two GB ram I have installed, FCP doesn't seem to utilize more than 100MB of RAM. Although the VM size is several GB for the app. I noticed that in order to utilize both cores on my MBP, Airport had to be turned off.
Also, as Ned Snowing was saying, there is no doubt that there are going to be many software bugs that must be sorted out. Especially since this program is being adapted for intel macs, and not re-written.

Why My Cpu is getting at 100% when I open ITunes? (Memory problem)

Good day everyone,
Why is my CPU getting at 100% eating over 700 000k of ram as soon as I open Itunes?
Even if I'm closing the process it reopens automaticly and take all the memory...I am under Windows Vista (Family ed.) and I have the latest version of ITunes...
Thank you for your help!
Regards,
Dominique

It worked for me, for iTunes Store and Safari both!
amandav2 wrote:
I found a solution to my problem.
> start menu
> accessories,
> right click on the command prompt icon and choose "run as administrator".
Once it opens, type in the following command...
netsh winsock reset
hit enter
You should get a message that the winsock reset successful and you will need to reboot your computer.
Reboot and when I reloaded itunes the store loaded fine.

Mouse freezing during CPU intensive tasks

So ive been running the w10 preview for a while now ( i dont remember the version number i joined at) and the only issue ive been having is it will occasionally stop accepting input from the mouse. Cursor freezes but the rest of the OS is fine. if i navigate
to device manager with the keyboard it still shows the mouse is connected. if i unplug the mouse when it freezes and plug it back in (same or different slot) the pc makes the connected device noise but then hangs. no BSOD it just hangs and i have to force
restart. if i Sleep the pc and then turn it back on it will work again but this only works 5 or 6 times and then the system refuses to sleep and a restart is needed.
It appears to only occur when the pc is doing something intensive. if im just browsing or watching youtube its fine. Playing Dota2 is not too bad but it gets worse when im playing Besiege (lots of physics calcs?) and it lasts barely 2 minutes if im gamestreaming/screenrecording.
halp :(

Hi,
We can find the watermark version number on the right bottom of the desktop screen.
First, I recommend you you patch the system with latest windows updates inclusing latest device drivers, then check the system performance.
Run virus scan to eliminate malware\virus infection.
If this issue persists, then when it happens, I recommend you press ctrl-alt-del to lauch task manager, then check the process\cpu\memory usage, find something abnormal.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

IPhoto being very CPU intensive

Hi, at the moment, when iPhoto (7.1.3) is open it seems to be working the CPU extremely hard as if it is processing something but I am not using it.
I am running an iMac G5 with 2GB ram under OS 10.5.3 with current updates installed.
I have recently "reverted to original" all my portrait oriented shots to ensure the full size version is available to me when I wish to do some editing, can it be processing the converted files in the background somehow?
It's really bugging me as the fan is running flat out to keep the cpu cool, and thats not cool
I have 6500 or so photos taking up 35GB of memory.
Cheers in advance.

Most cameras I've used are able to turn off the auto-rotate feature. You just have to find the correct menu. I upload to a folder on the desktop first and rotate the files losslessly before importing.
When you launch iPhoto which mode are you in? If it's Photos do you have Event Titles selected to be displayed? If so do you have all the Events open? Having all the thumbnails displayed when opening will definitely cause slowness and intensive CPU usage.
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.≤br>
Note: There now an Automator backup application for iPhoto 5 that will work with Tiger or Leopard.

Hyperlinks - CPU intensive

Why does inserting hyperlinks take up all the CPU (NB: RAM is
not a problem) on my laptop and sort of freezes Dreamweaver? It
takes about 15 seconds to respond, which isn't cool when I need to
insert upwards of a hundred hyperlinks. It doesn't happen with any
other tags I insert, including anchor, table, list tags. What can I
do to prevent this effect? In case it's relevant, I have
"Macromedia DreamweaverMX 2004, version 7.0.1"

Why does inserting hyperlinks take up all the CPU (NB: RAM is
not a problem) on my laptop and sort of freezes Dreamweaver? It
takes about 15 seconds to respond, which isn't cool when I need to
insert upwards of a hundred hyperlinks. It doesn't happen with any
other tags I insert, including anchor, table, list tags. What can I
do to prevent this effect? In case it's relevant, I have
"Macromedia DreamweaverMX 2004, version 7.0.1"

10.5.7. why so CPU intensive on PBG412"?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for