10.8.4 update is it worthy?

Hi, is it worthy to make this upgrade?
Apparently it has many glitches.
I tried to install it doing software upgrade but it keeps telling me for a reboot and it stills shows version 10.8.3.
My mac is 3 days new and I really dont want to screw it just for an upgrade.
Tks for the help
Fede

It will be erased automatically, so yes, it should be totally empty. You could partition your 1 TB drive first, then clone to that partition, thus, protecting the files already on the drive.
To resize the drive do the following:
1. Restart the computer and after the chime press and hold down the COMMAND and R keys until the menu screen appears. Alternatively, restart the computer and after the chime press and hold down the OPTION key until the boot manager screen appears. Select the Recovery HD and click on the downward pointing arrow button.
After the main menu appears select Disk Utility and click on the Continue button. Select the hard drive's main entry then click on the Partition tab in the DU main window.
2. You should see the graphical sizing window showing the existing partitions. A portion may appear as a blue rectangle representing the used space on a partition.
3. In the lower right corner of the sizing rectangle for each partition is a resizing gadget. Select it with the mouse and move the bottom of the rectangle upwards until you have reduced the existing partition enough to create the desired new volume's size. The space below the resized partition will appear gray. Click on the Apply button and wait until the process has completed.  (Note: You can only make a partition smaller in order to create new free space.)
4. Click on the [+] button below the sizing window to add a new partition in the gray space you freed up. Give the new volume a name, if you wish, then click on the Apply button. Wait until the process has completed.
You should now have a new volume on the drive.
It would be wise to have a backup of your current system as resizing is not necessarily free of risk for data loss.  Your drive must have sufficient contiguous free space for this process to work.

Similar Messages

  • E52 52.003 update - a worthy firmware

    Just updated from 51.018 to 52.003 and very happy with it. The phone is at last responsive with no laggy behaviour. T9 is still very weak but not complaining here so fair dues, congrats to Nokia devs, finally a firmware worthy of the hardware which is pretty amazing when you think about it. Thanks

    My experience on this is not so positive like yours....
    This new one hangs at some internet activities: VERY SLOW response in some unknown situation while browsing web;
    sudden crash more than two time in reading e-mail, and nothing left when try to read the mail by press e-mail key again;
    no show on input Tranditional Chinese character selection bar when replying Facebook;
    do not provide punctuation marks selection bar when typing in
    I feel owesome and regret on upgrading this.
    jkforde wrote:
    Just updated from 51.018 to 52.003 and very happy with it. The phone is at last responsive with no laggy behaviour. T9 is still very weak but not complaining here so fair dues, congrats to Nokia devs, finally a firmware worthy of the hardware which is pretty amazing when you think about it. Thanks

  • HT201364 why does app store tell me the update to mavericks is available and then i click on it and it tells me it's not available?  i am led to believe i am on deck for amazing things and then crushed to find out that i am not worthy.

    black macbook - 2 ghz intel core 2 duo, 2gb (667 mhz) sdram
    Model Name:
    MacBook
      Model Identifier:
    MacBook2,1
      Processor Name:
    Intel Core 2 Duo
      Processor Speed:
    2 GHz
      Number of Processors:
    1
      Total Number of Cores:
    2
      L2 Cache:
    4 MB
      Memory:
    2 GB
      Bus Speed:
    667 MHz
      Boot ROM Version:
    MB21.00A5.B07
      SMC Version (system):
    1.13f3
      Serial Number (system):
    4H*****WGM
      Hardware UUID:
      Sudden Motion Sensor:
      State:
    Enabled
    <Edited by Host>

    It is not that you are not worthy rather it is your Macbook2,1 that is incapable of handling Mavericks. The latest OS that your Macbook will support is Lion (OS X 10.7.x). The oldest Macbook that can handle Mavericks is Macbook5,1 (Aluminum Late 2008). Apple has for many years maintained a 7 year support window before a computer is declared obsolete and no longer supported. This is the seventh year in the Macbook2,1 lifecycle.

  • Hi, I have the new iPad and it's been working absolutely fine for me up until now, I have made no updates and now every time I open a Internet worthy app it keeps telling me to 'reconnect' to the Internet and I am already connected with 3 bars ?

    when I open safari it works and instagram, but I'm not getting any notifications through and my twitter isn't working either,
    Help would be greatly appreciated x

    Maybe try resetting network settings in settings, general, reset.

  • I cant pay my old bill because my informatio​ns been updating for days?

    I am a returning customer who cancelled there internet because my PC broke and I just got it fixed recently after starting up work again after being laid off since October. My final bill was paid but yet I went to log in to try and renew my service with verizon and all it keeps saying is were updating your account information, and "We are unable to process your request at this time.
    Please try again later. We apologize for any inconvenience." so whats the deal I just want to pay for my internet again and not create a new account and get charged 20$ for shipping and handling for a modem that has already lasted me 3+ years? If I can not resolve the issue I guess I have to go seek another company to use there services since my money is not worthy enough for verizon anymore.

    Sorry you are having difficulty, an agent with access to your account will reach out to you directly by email, private message in the Forums and/or the billing telephone number on your Verizon account for more information to help you resolve your issue.

  • Start up problems after Safari 3.1 and Security update

    Updated safari and security update last night.
    Safari downloaded and installed but there was an error downloading or installing the security update, I forgot.
    After I restarted everything booted up fine, but was stuck on "Starting Mac OS X" screen.
    Did a fsck and zap the pram, still stuck.
    Today I tried booting up in safe mode, stuck on the gray screen with the apple logo.
    Then I tried booting up from an external firewire dvd drive. Repaired permissions, repaired the disk, but it is still stuck on "Starting Mac OS X" screen. Help please...
    Thank you

    Ok i had a similar problem, with all the recent updates for Leopard, including the 10.5.2 combo update... the 12" PowerBook G4 kept getting stuck on the grey apple and spinning wheel... if it managed to get past this it would get stuck on the blue screen!!!
    The way i got around this, after trying all these other tips was: Archived & Installed 10.5; restarted, waited; downloaded 10.5.2 Combo update, installed; restarted, waited; waited; waited; after getting back to desktop, restarted, waited; then ran Software Update only installing one at a time, and after each install, restarted, waited; when all Software updates completed, proceeded with iLife updates etc... It took a while (still quicker than the 3 days of failed installs and updates) with a lot of waiting on the blue screen (5-20mins) but we got there in the end. Disks where checked with Leopard Disk Utility before and after, permissions where checked before and after completing all installs, also with a DW 4.1 optimization. Also note worthy is the RAM was upgraded from the initial 256Mb (!!!) with an extra Gb.

  • SuperDrive media disc(s) .. assist .. update concluded . . .

    Concluding post in relation to the earlier postings on this particular subject and thread (now officially closed by apple support) .. and to be found at SuperDrive Media Disc(s) .. Assist ... [http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=759874#759874]
    APPLE DVD R DISC MEDIA TRIAL
    DVD-R
    8x speed
    Certified for use with Apple DVD-R drives :: 4.7GB Media
    Made in Japan
    MAC MINI MATSHITA DVD-R UJ-845C
    Mac mini 1.42GHz PowerPC G4 | 512 MB DDR SDRAM
    Tiger OS X 10.4.3
    Finder Burn - single folder containing many sub-folders totaling about 800Mbytes and approx. 4000 files.
    Burn Speed Options : 4x(faster) : 2x : 1x(more reliable) - actual Finder media disc burn dialogue descriptions
    [default selection is 4x(faster) ]
    We choose 1x(more reliable) ..
    Observations include .. no 8x speed media disc burn available from our little Mac mini Matshita DVD-R UJ-845C burner .. and .. as this is a DVD R .. we have time .. but no going back once burned .. and we want maximum systems compatibility .. you, dear reader, already know the drama we have previously experienced with Finder burns and older Apple iMac DV SE machine DVD drive (media disc burned) read compatibilities.
    The total burn was a lengthy delay before the entire routine was completed including automatic verification.
    OUTCOME
    This disc did not verify correctly and is unreliable. Because this disc is unreliable, discard it and try again using a new, blank disc. (Error code ) 0x80020063
    Total disc burned is almost 800Mbytes and about 4000 files.
    Verification was not an available option for the burn .. a Finder burn .. meaning verification was apparently automatically included as an unseen 'yes' option at media disc burn execution time.
    Examining the resulting Apple DVD R media disc burned .. we discover that things are good .. biggest single files (.dmg's at about 100Mbytes expanding to 350Mbytes - e.g. OS X 10.4.3 update) are able to be copied from the burned Apple DVD R media disc back to the Mac mini hard disk again and verify 100% when opened for installation. Encouraging. Better than anything previously experienced.
    iMac DV SE [ DVD MATSHITADVD-ROM SR-8184 ]
    Into the Apple iMac ancient (500 MHz PowerPC G3 operating OS X 10.4.3 Tiger | 640MB SDRAM) and we are greeted with goodness .. same accessibility as the originating Mac mini machine .. satisfying.
    And yes the 'problem' of multi-session burns is yet to come on the ancient iMac and if the response is any good as now .. it may not be a problem worthy of mention. At 800 Mbytes burn and 4.7 Gbytes capacity .. one could loosely forecast up to another 5 media disc burn sessions before the DVD R is full and complete.
    XP MACHINE
    And now into the PC machine for an XP looksee and again .. more goodness. Cross compatible files are fully accessible (an entire - own - website burned). Large files copy 100%. Better than before.
    Two thumbs up for this disk and burn.
    Verification failure remains a current mystery. Anyone ?
    It is easy to figure how one may doubt one's media burning hardware is any good by now .. but the gathering volume of supporting entries at the relevant media burning and error message forums reveals that hardware is unlikely to be (entirely) at fault .. rather something else .. say firmware ?
    Apple Media DVD R discs are manufactured in Japan (stated on the disc) and the quality difference and price premium are consistent with what others have written of the place of manufacture and the Apple media disc as well. Mostly positive.
    Still .. we should like to have access to dependable RW discs from Apple too .. for reliable re-useability.
    As for the subject of burn speed ...
    Many forum readers are well aware of an ongoing and gradually escalating matter between Apple and this gentleman http://www.crc.id.au/page/2/ .. we have curiously followed the unfolding events to observe the outcome of the burn speed specification variation. As you know .. our Mac mini is rated at maximum DVD media disc burn 4x and fitted with a MATSHITA DVD-R UJ-845C which is a later edition than Mr H's UJ-835 .. however .. we are more curious to observe whether the final outcome will satisfy Mr H or not. Burn speed, primarily, and quality of burn, secondarily, on selected media by Mr H. Once the outcome is known and to Mr H's satisfaction .. then we may enquire about his satisfaction with burn quality at the chosen burn speed(s) by Mr H.
    Here is an offline forum communication that we shared with another Mac mini user about disc media burn speed. As you may read .. he is entirely dissatisfied with the Mac mini media burn speed and isn't too keen on using the Apple disc burn media either ...
    So...Have you found any dvd-r or +r media that burns reliably on the mini? (non apple media please).
    I am completely disgusted with my new mini's pathetic superdrive that I paid way too much for.
    I have purchased new & built from new parts several PC's that burn DVD after DVD on a wide variety of media reliably.
    No one has even replied to my post
    http://www.123macmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2773&start=0&postdays=0&postord er=asc&highlight=
    Thanks
    .. and at latest check .. no-one has responded to the post .. maybe no-one knows .. outside of Apple HQ .. mind you .. no-one has truly usefully responded to our post either .. we responded thusly ...
    Mac Mini SuperDrive .. burn speed .. and burn .. reliability
    Sometime I just can't get my head around the subject and have to step back and breathe in real deep .. which makes me kinda dizzy .. and wait until the focus is on the forest before
    choosing the tree(s) to climb. This particular tree is getting taller ...
    And congratulations on your Apple ownership. Small is beautiful.
    Regret your coaster experiences. Frustrating and unfortunate.
    What SuperDrive description is fitted in your new mac mini ?
    We seem to be staring into a gaping black hole of acknowledgement .. from anyone.
    PC users, windows operating system software computers, appear to have an extreme edge .. when it comes to media disc burning. i.e. successful burns.
    Re-reading that lengthy post .. which doesn't fully format as intended .. has me fully believing that less is more and small is beautiful (still). Future specific posts will probably follow as a matter of personal self-committment .. to persist until the solutions are fully to hand. For now .. may we refer to your mentioned post in our next planned post please ? Solidarity of negatory outcome experience is credibility.
    Three forums have we frequented and participated to learn more about the black hole .. we know as SuperDrive media disc burning .. only you have provided any feedback whatsoever .. post reader numbers grow but answers are missing in action .. absent from class.
    http://www.crc.id.au/page/2/
    We have thought the SuperDrive matter you have referred to in your post was of no concern to us .. but now you have us thinking again .. although model numbers differ .. (ours is a later numerical reference) the concerns appear to be similar .. or largely about performance .. we shall also refer to this domain in our planned next post. Yes, we are aware of the matter .. from another forum .. but shall now supply the link for others to weigh and hopefully dish out their two cents worth .. where a consensus could mean we are also a part of this particular action. An ideal consensus would be firmware is unsuitable .. requires immediate update .. and in particular the quality of burn is consensually unacceptable .. action could follow.
    We have progressed no further with burning experimentations .. and will be using Apple media before progressing with our findings reporting. For now, we are unable to add to your ease of mind .. frankly .. unless the burning media is made in Japan .. we doubt any burn verification success is to be had. And we cannot find any burning media made in Japan in our locale. Where is the Apple media made?
    We have come to appreciate the SuperDrive is all about the firmware .. but have no new firmware to apply .. in fact .. our research to date shows that we have been unable to find the Matshita SuperDrive at all online and cannot confirm specifications .. neither could we locate the specifications at www.apple.com.au .. which is just plain odd.
    A third look has provided ... from www.apple.com/macmini/specs.html ..
    Storage
    * One of the following optical drives:
    o Slot-loading Combo drive (DVD-ROM/CD-RW): reads DVDs at up to 8x speed, writes CD-R discs at up to 24x speed, writes CD-RW discs at up to 16x speed, reads CDs at up to 24x speed
    o Optional SuperDrive (DVD±RW/CD-RW): writes DVD-R discs at up to 4x speed, writes DVD-RW discs at up to 2x speed, writes DVD+R discs at up to 4x speed, writes DVD+RW discs at up to 2.4x speed, reads DVDs at up to 8x speed, writes CD-R discs at up to 16x speed, writes CD-RW discs at up to 8x speed, reads CDs at up to 24x speed
    Where were you able to establish your SuperDrive (burning) specifications ?
    Writer's note : .. some things change .. and so have the Apple Mac mini SuperDrive burner specs changed .. since recording those detailed above. In fact .. they read like they maybe should have all along .. 8x DVD R media burn speed. DL is a bonus. Can anyone tell us what the drive designation is please ?
    CRC says: ".. This limits burn speed to 4x for Mac Minis and 8x for Powerbooks.".
    While speed matters .. and it does .. you appear to have exactly the same media disc burning problems that we are experiencing .. failed verification(s) .. and for us .. in short .. complete DVD-R media disc burned rejection from the Apple OS X.
    Do we .. in actual fact .. have two separate operating challenges here .. speed of burn and quality of burn .. any burn ? Speed was not our first priority .. quality is .. now we figure that at any speed the burn quality is anywhere from dubious to coaster.
    CRC says: ".. The UJ-835 that Apple use is firmware limited to suit various bits of hardware that they want to put together. The burner in the Mac Mini is the exact same model as the one in the PowerBooks. Apple load a 4x firmware on the Mac Mini, and an 8x firmware on the PowerBook drives.
    My bet is that this is for marketting reasons only. ".
    One of the contributors to http://www.crc.id.au/?p=21 . . says . .
    # Moneky Boy Says:
    August 14th, 2005 at 1:03 am
    My parents have a mini and my has one of the PowerBooks. Confirmed the drives are Matsushita UJ-835. They have never had an issue burning DVDs. Confirmed it by burning DVDs last night on the wife’s 12″ PowerBook.
    As far as updating the Firmware in your optical drives, no, you do not have to remove them from the machines to update their firmware. I’ve updated the firmware on my optical drives (for Region Free and/or speed gains) via the GUI in Mac OS X. One application that will do this is called DVRFlashX I believe. The key is then finding the firmware, which is platform agnostic.
    BTW, removing the drive wouldn’t void the warranty on your Mac but messing with the firmware certainly will void the warranty on the drive.
    Our primary concern remains SuperDrive media disc burn quality .. while you do appear to share the same concern as well as speed performance. Mr Haigh's only concern appears to be speed .. and here we may have missed any opportunity .. since the MATSHITA DVD-R UJ-845C
    SuperDrive is a later designation and the speed performance specifications showing on the apple web-site are likely consistent with current performance capabilities of that SuperDrive and later .. including yours ?
    Mr H may have indeed received marketing materials that promised 8x while actually receiving a 4x SuperDrive .. which only performs at 2x unless exceptional media disc(s) .. so he does have a legitimate claim concerning performance. Do we ?
    What has us fully curious is whether he can burn quality media disc(s) with his new SuperDrive ..
    (Update 24/12/2005 07:10pm (+11 GMT)
    Well, it seems that Apple have decided to replace my hardware. I've started the proceedings yesterday and will hopefully get some news in the new year as to what they are going to replace. At the moment, I'm looking to send in the 12" Powerbook for a replacement, then see what changes in the mac mini side of things. I'm not going to accept the same DVD drive - as we all know the problems with the UJ-835. Stay tuned for more details as they come to hand.) .. http://superdrive.crc.id.au/
    .. which would likely be the same as yours .. now that should prove an interesting outcome .. which he seems likely to voluntarily report and will be the essence of any enquiries from us in the near foreseeable future assuming Mr Haigh is forthcoming in his SuperDrive computing developments.
    Mr Haigh may have begun to scratch the surface (so to speak) .. and find the more serious problem is that no matter how fast or slow the SuperDrive .. reliable media disc burns are a fantasy !
    As yet no update .. almost three months .. could the delay by Apple could have something to do with the model identification of any replacement DVD burner .. if they use an UJ-845 .. then all **** could break loose as Apple users realise (such as we) they do have the same DVD burner and (in a Mac mini) are limited to 4x maximum speed DVD media disc burning performance .. so another designation may be required .. one that already delivers 8x DVD burns .. bit of a mess really .. and the latest Mac mini SuperDrive sports 8x DVD R media burn speed.
    We are curious about you too, dear reader .. are you satisfied with your non Apple disc media burn quality ? We are able to openly admit that we are dissatisfied with our non Apple disc media burn output quality.
    We are currently satisfied with the Apple DV R disc media burn quality. However at a price of premium dollars and an unexplained media burn verification failure message.
    Burn speed, we nonchalantly confess, is not our greatest concern, and, for now, falls to a lower priority of importance with us.
    For now the matter is at rest with us.
    How about you ?
    Yours Sincerely
    Stuart
    PS. .. helping to explain the confusions surrounding the Mac mini SuperDrive is this extracted from ..
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_mini
    October 2005–February 2006
    Multiple reports exist that the Mac mini was quietly upgraded in October 2005 to 64 MiB VRAM, and either a 1.33 GHz (up from 1.25 GHz) or 1.5 GHz G4 (up from 1.42 GHz) processor, with 512 MiB of PC3200 RAM while underclocking it to PC2700. The 80 GB drive is currently a Seagate Momentus 5400.2 ST9808211A, which runs at 5400 RPM with an 8 MiB cache. The SuperDrive is a MATSHITA DVD-R UJ-845, which supports +R DL burning, and may also have unofficial support for DVD-RAM. Apple did not revise the official specifications on their web site. This may be to avoid issues with discounting or discontinuing of old stock.
    Well .. whatever .. we use a MATSHITA DVD-R UJ-845C SuperDrive .. wouldn't that mean we have +R DL feature too ? .. probably not judging by the following explanations .. sort of .. and yes you could grab the mac_min.pdf service manual and do your own upgrading and overclocking as it pleases you .. try google for more info.
    PPS. .. http://www.macintouch.com/macmini11.html
    Mac Mini Part 11
    January 9, 2006
    Stealth Upgrade
    Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx
    I recently received the SuperDrive Mac Mini that I ordered from Amazon the day after Christmas. To my delight, my Mini contains a 1.5 GHz PPC and 64MB of video RAM.
    The SuperDrive is listed as a Panasonic UJ-845. According to Panasonic's web site this drive is supposed to allow DVD-RAM writing (and I assume reading). Has anyone attempted to use DVD-RAM discs with this drive under 10.4.3?
    Xxxxxx Xxxx
    I also have a new SuperDrive mini with the same specs, and note that the UJ-845 drive doesn't include DVD-RAM capability, though as Gordon notes the OEM Panasonic drive does. However, Panasonic's spec page is for the UJ-845-B drive, and I expect that the one in the mini is instead a special version of the UJ-845 that Panasonic made for Apple with DVD-RAM disabled. For some reason Apple doesn't seem to want to support DVD-RAM, which is a pity. I believe the drive will work with DVD-RAM discs, but treat them like DVD-RW, requiring complete erasure every time they're used, rather than allowing addition and subtraction of individual files, which is what makes DVD-RAM a great backup/exchange medium, especially for travelers.
    My new PowerBook came with an Apple-labeled Panasonic UJ-825-C drive, which System Profiler saw as simply "UJ-825" and which didn't include DVD-RAM although Panasonic's specs showed it; I replaced it with an 825-B I got on eBay, which System Profiler sees as "845-S" and which now does DVD-RAM even without Patchburn. Note that the 825 is two generations earlier than the current 845/846 drive (whose new feature is DL burning); DVD-RAM has been available for a long time, but Apple has been using special versions of the drives without it.
    How to exactly determine the capabilities of your drive: Insert a disc (any type, CD or DVD, but not a blank recordable disc that has to be formatted), open Disk Utility, and on the left side select the drive (not the disc in the drive), then look in the lower right side of the window where it says "Capabilities". You may have to widen the window to see the whole list, as it doesn't wrap for some reason. If it says "DVD-RAM" in the list, the drive should do DVD-RAM discs as they are meant to be used: like a 4GB floppy disk, they must be formatted once, then can be used as "random access media" (RAM). Doesn't matter what kind of disc you put in the drive; any type will make the drive appear in Disk Utility, which will then show its capabilities.
    FOLLOWUP: I opened up the Mac Mini, and found the SuperDrive is an Apple label "UJ-845C", presumably a special version of the 845 with DVD-RAM disabled, unlike the UJ-845-B spec'd at the Panasonic site.
    [MacInTouch]
    We just received a middle-model Mac Mini - 80GB/512MB/AirPort+Bluetooth/Tiger - ordered from Amazon (currently $519.99 after rebate) and were pleased to find that it is one of Apple's "stealth" upgrades, where the label belies the actual specifications. Apple shows it as a 1.42GHz model, but it's actually running at 1.5 GHz, according to System Profiler.
    It has a Seagate ST9808211A hard drive, which is a 5400-RPM model (better than the dog-slow 4200-RPM drives Apple started shipping sometime after the original Mini models debuted).
    The optical drive is a Matsushita CW-8124, a Combo drive with 24X CD writing and reading and the ability to read DVD-R and DVD-RW, as well as DVD-ROM, at 8x.
    System Profiler shows 64 MB of video RAM - double Apple's specified amount - for the "ATY,RV280" graphics card (ATI Radeon 9200) on an AGP bus, supporting display rotation and Quartz Extreme but not Core Image.
    (For what it's worth, we found that we could not connect a Dell 1704FPT to the digital video port while an analog video cable was connected; after removing the analog cable, the Dell works beautifully with the Mini's DVI video. The Dell display also worked fine with analog video via the adapter included with the Mini.)
    We also tried a WiebeTech Maxelerate hard drive enclosure but found it unpleasantly noisy, even in a special reduced-RPM version the company offers customers who raise the issue. By contrast, the miniStack we previously reviewed is virtually silent with the same hard drive inside.
    Xxx Xxxxxxx
    While this isn't the first time I've seen this type of 'error' from Apple, or other firms, this particular incident seems to have gone beyond the typical example, and I'm beginning to wonder if it is more than just an overlap in an otherwise complicated process.
    I've done my share of OEM documentation, including manuals, labels and cartons. I know how hard it is to maintain reality in this regard. But in this case, it seems to me that the mismatch between the inside and the outside of the package has gone beyond the norm, and I'm wondering if someone along the line has simply decided to live with it, rather than deal with it up front. I can see this saving money...changes cost more than just the ink - it takes time and planning to overcome a spec change and cover all the bases.
    I wouldn't be surprised if someone in a position to decide hasn't simply elected to run out the materials without implementing changes. After all, the customer gets more than they expect, which can be favorable publicity, and we all know the saying "any publicity is good, and good publicity is even better".
    On the other hand, it can be a minefield to fess up. Once word gets out, customers start hand-picking the good from the better, taking the higraded units and leaving the rest as floatsom. Or they buy the downgrade for less, then return it shortly thereafter, demanding the up while refusing to pay more.
    Let's just hope the sun keeps shining on this particular parade, and no one decides to claim fraud. All it would take is one competitor with a surplus of over-eager attorneys, and Apple would be forced to apologize for over-stuffing the golden goose.

    Concluding post in relation to the earlier postings on this particular subject and thread (now officially closed by apple support) .. and to be found at SuperDrive Media Disc(s) .. Assist ... [http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=759874#759874]
    APPLE DVD R DISC MEDIA TRIAL
    DVD-R
    8x speed
    Certified for use with Apple DVD-R drives :: 4.7GB Media
    Made in Japan
    MAC MINI MATSHITA DVD-R UJ-845C
    Mac mini 1.42GHz PowerPC G4 | 512 MB DDR SDRAM
    Tiger OS X 10.4.3
    Finder Burn - single folder containing many sub-folders totaling about 800Mbytes and approx. 4000 files.
    Burn Speed Options : 4x(faster) : 2x : 1x(more reliable) - actual Finder media disc burn dialogue descriptions
    [default selection is 4x(faster) ]
    We choose 1x(more reliable) ..
    Observations include .. no 8x speed media disc burn available from our little Mac mini Matshita DVD-R UJ-845C burner .. and .. as this is a DVD R .. we have time .. but no going back once burned .. and we want maximum systems compatibility .. you, dear reader, already know the drama we have previously experienced with Finder burns and older Apple iMac DV SE machine DVD drive (media disc burned) read compatibilities.
    The total burn was a lengthy delay before the entire routine was completed including automatic verification.
    OUTCOME
    This disc did not verify correctly and is unreliable. Because this disc is unreliable, discard it and try again using a new, blank disc. (Error code ) 0x80020063
    Total disc burned is almost 800Mbytes and about 4000 files.
    Verification was not an available option for the burn .. a Finder burn .. meaning verification was apparently automatically included as an unseen 'yes' option at media disc burn execution time.
    Examining the resulting Apple DVD R media disc burned .. we discover that things are good .. biggest single files (.dmg's at about 100Mbytes expanding to 350Mbytes - e.g. OS X 10.4.3 update) are able to be copied from the burned Apple DVD R media disc back to the Mac mini hard disk again and verify 100% when opened for installation. Encouraging. Better than anything previously experienced.
    iMac DV SE [ DVD MATSHITADVD-ROM SR-8184 ]
    Into the Apple iMac ancient (500 MHz PowerPC G3 operating OS X 10.4.3 Tiger | 640MB SDRAM) and we are greeted with goodness .. same accessibility as the originating Mac mini machine .. satisfying.
    And yes the 'problem' of multi-session burns is yet to come on the ancient iMac and if the response is any good as now .. it may not be a problem worthy of mention. At 800 Mbytes burn and 4.7 Gbytes capacity .. one could loosely forecast up to another 5 media disc burn sessions before the DVD R is full and complete.
    XP MACHINE
    And now into the PC machine for an XP looksee and again .. more goodness. Cross compatible files are fully accessible (an entire - own - website burned). Large files copy 100%. Better than before.
    Two thumbs up for this disk and burn.
    Verification failure remains a current mystery. Anyone ?
    It is easy to figure how one may doubt one's media burning hardware is any good by now .. but the gathering volume of supporting entries at the relevant media burning and error message forums reveals that hardware is unlikely to be (entirely) at fault .. rather something else .. say firmware ?
    Apple Media DVD R discs are manufactured in Japan (stated on the disc) and the quality difference and price premium are consistent with what others have written of the place of manufacture and the Apple media disc as well. Mostly positive.
    Still .. we should like to have access to dependable RW discs from Apple too .. for reliable re-useability.
    As for the subject of burn speed ...
    Many forum readers are well aware of an ongoing and gradually escalating matter between Apple and this gentleman http://www.crc.id.au/page/2/ .. we have curiously followed the unfolding events to observe the outcome of the burn speed specification variation. As you know .. our Mac mini is rated at maximum DVD media disc burn 4x and fitted with a MATSHITA DVD-R UJ-845C which is a later edition than Mr H's UJ-835 .. however .. we are more curious to observe whether the final outcome will satisfy Mr H or not. Burn speed, primarily, and quality of burn, secondarily, on selected media by Mr H. Once the outcome is known and to Mr H's satisfaction .. then we may enquire about his satisfaction with burn quality at the chosen burn speed(s) by Mr H.
    Here is an offline forum communication that we shared with another Mac mini user about disc media burn speed. As you may read .. he is entirely dissatisfied with the Mac mini media burn speed and isn't too keen on using the Apple disc burn media either ...
    So...Have you found any dvd-r or +r media that burns reliably on the mini? (non apple media please).
    I am completely disgusted with my new mini's pathetic superdrive that I paid way too much for.
    I have purchased new & built from new parts several PC's that burn DVD after DVD on a wide variety of media reliably.
    No one has even replied to my post
    http://www.123macmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2773&start=0&postdays=0&postord er=asc&highlight=
    Thanks
    .. and at latest check .. no-one has responded to the post .. maybe no-one knows .. outside of Apple HQ .. mind you .. no-one has truly usefully responded to our post either .. we responded thusly ...
    Mac Mini SuperDrive .. burn speed .. and burn .. reliability
    Sometime I just can't get my head around the subject and have to step back and breathe in real deep .. which makes me kinda dizzy .. and wait until the focus is on the forest before
    choosing the tree(s) to climb. This particular tree is getting taller ...
    And congratulations on your Apple ownership. Small is beautiful.
    Regret your coaster experiences. Frustrating and unfortunate.
    What SuperDrive description is fitted in your new mac mini ?
    We seem to be staring into a gaping black hole of acknowledgement .. from anyone.
    PC users, windows operating system software computers, appear to have an extreme edge .. when it comes to media disc burning. i.e. successful burns.
    Re-reading that lengthy post .. which doesn't fully format as intended .. has me fully believing that less is more and small is beautiful (still). Future specific posts will probably follow as a matter of personal self-committment .. to persist until the solutions are fully to hand. For now .. may we refer to your mentioned post in our next planned post please ? Solidarity of negatory outcome experience is credibility.
    Three forums have we frequented and participated to learn more about the black hole .. we know as SuperDrive media disc burning .. only you have provided any feedback whatsoever .. post reader numbers grow but answers are missing in action .. absent from class.
    http://www.crc.id.au/page/2/
    We have thought the SuperDrive matter you have referred to in your post was of no concern to us .. but now you have us thinking again .. although model numbers differ .. (ours is a later numerical reference) the concerns appear to be similar .. or largely about performance .. we shall also refer to this domain in our planned next post. Yes, we are aware of the matter .. from another forum .. but shall now supply the link for others to weigh and hopefully dish out their two cents worth .. where a consensus could mean we are also a part of this particular action. An ideal consensus would be firmware is unsuitable .. requires immediate update .. and in particular the quality of burn is consensually unacceptable .. action could follow.
    We have progressed no further with burning experimentations .. and will be using Apple media before progressing with our findings reporting. For now, we are unable to add to your ease of mind .. frankly .. unless the burning media is made in Japan .. we doubt any burn verification success is to be had. And we cannot find any burning media made in Japan in our locale. Where is the Apple media made?
    We have come to appreciate the SuperDrive is all about the firmware .. but have no new firmware to apply .. in fact .. our research to date shows that we have been unable to find the Matshita SuperDrive at all online and cannot confirm specifications .. neither could we locate the specifications at www.apple.com.au .. which is just plain odd.
    A third look has provided ... from www.apple.com/macmini/specs.html ..
    Storage
    * One of the following optical drives:
    o Slot-loading Combo drive (DVD-ROM/CD-RW): reads DVDs at up to 8x speed, writes CD-R discs at up to 24x speed, writes CD-RW discs at up to 16x speed, reads CDs at up to 24x speed
    o Optional SuperDrive (DVD±RW/CD-RW): writes DVD-R discs at up to 4x speed, writes DVD-RW discs at up to 2x speed, writes DVD+R discs at up to 4x speed, writes DVD+RW discs at up to 2.4x speed, reads DVDs at up to 8x speed, writes CD-R discs at up to 16x speed, writes CD-RW discs at up to 8x speed, reads CDs at up to 24x speed
    Where were you able to establish your SuperDrive (burning) specifications ?
    Writer's note : .. some things change .. and so have the Apple Mac mini SuperDrive burner specs changed .. since recording those detailed above. In fact .. they read like they maybe should have all along .. 8x DVD R media burn speed. DL is a bonus. Can anyone tell us what the drive designation is please ?
    CRC says: ".. This limits burn speed to 4x for Mac Minis and 8x for Powerbooks.".
    While speed matters .. and it does .. you appear to have exactly the same media disc burning problems that we are experiencing .. failed verification(s) .. and for us .. in short .. complete DVD-R media disc burned rejection from the Apple OS X.
    Do we .. in actual fact .. have two separate operating challenges here .. speed of burn and quality of burn .. any burn ? Speed was not our first priority .. quality is .. now we figure that at any speed the burn quality is anywhere from dubious to coaster.
    CRC says: ".. The UJ-835 that Apple use is firmware limited to suit various bits of hardware that they want to put together. The burner in the Mac Mini is the exact same model as the one in the PowerBooks. Apple load a 4x firmware on the Mac Mini, and an 8x firmware on the PowerBook drives.
    My bet is that this is for marketting reasons only. ".
    One of the contributors to http://www.crc.id.au/?p=21 . . says . .
    # Moneky Boy Says:
    August 14th, 2005 at 1:03 am
    My parents have a mini and my has one of the PowerBooks. Confirmed the drives are Matsushita UJ-835. They have never had an issue burning DVDs. Confirmed it by burning DVDs last night on the wife’s 12″ PowerBook.
    As far as updating the Firmware in your optical drives, no, you do not have to remove them from the machines to update their firmware. I’ve updated the firmware on my optical drives (for Region Free and/or speed gains) via the GUI in Mac OS X. One application that will do this is called DVRFlashX I believe. The key is then finding the firmware, which is platform agnostic.
    BTW, removing the drive wouldn’t void the warranty on your Mac but messing with the firmware certainly will void the warranty on the drive.
    Our primary concern remains SuperDrive media disc burn quality .. while you do appear to share the same concern as well as speed performance. Mr Haigh's only concern appears to be speed .. and here we may have missed any opportunity .. since the MATSHITA DVD-R UJ-845C
    SuperDrive is a later designation and the speed performance specifications showing on the apple web-site are likely consistent with current performance capabilities of that SuperDrive and later .. including yours ?
    Mr H may have indeed received marketing materials that promised 8x while actually receiving a 4x SuperDrive .. which only performs at 2x unless exceptional media disc(s) .. so he does have a legitimate claim concerning performance. Do we ?
    What has us fully curious is whether he can burn quality media disc(s) with his new SuperDrive ..
    (Update 24/12/2005 07:10pm (+11 GMT)
    Well, it seems that Apple have decided to replace my hardware. I've started the proceedings yesterday and will hopefully get some news in the new year as to what they are going to replace. At the moment, I'm looking to send in the 12" Powerbook for a replacement, then see what changes in the mac mini side of things. I'm not going to accept the same DVD drive - as we all know the problems with the UJ-835. Stay tuned for more details as they come to hand.) .. http://superdrive.crc.id.au/
    .. which would likely be the same as yours .. now that should prove an interesting outcome .. which he seems likely to voluntarily report and will be the essence of any enquiries from us in the near foreseeable future assuming Mr Haigh is forthcoming in his SuperDrive computing developments.
    Mr Haigh may have begun to scratch the surface (so to speak) .. and find the more serious problem is that no matter how fast or slow the SuperDrive .. reliable media disc burns are a fantasy !
    As yet no update .. almost three months .. could the delay by Apple could have something to do with the model identification of any replacement DVD burner .. if they use an UJ-845 .. then all **** could break loose as Apple users realise (such as we) they do have the same DVD burner and (in a Mac mini) are limited to 4x maximum speed DVD media disc burning performance .. so another designation may be required .. one that already delivers 8x DVD burns .. bit of a mess really .. and the latest Mac mini SuperDrive sports 8x DVD R media burn speed.
    We are curious about you too, dear reader .. are you satisfied with your non Apple disc media burn quality ? We are able to openly admit that we are dissatisfied with our non Apple disc media burn output quality.
    We are currently satisfied with the Apple DV R disc media burn quality. However at a price of premium dollars and an unexplained media burn verification failure message.
    Burn speed, we nonchalantly confess, is not our greatest concern, and, for now, falls to a lower priority of importance with us.
    For now the matter is at rest with us.
    How about you ?
    Yours Sincerely
    Stuart
    PS. .. helping to explain the confusions surrounding the Mac mini SuperDrive is this extracted from ..
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_mini
    October 2005–February 2006
    Multiple reports exist that the Mac mini was quietly upgraded in October 2005 to 64 MiB VRAM, and either a 1.33 GHz (up from 1.25 GHz) or 1.5 GHz G4 (up from 1.42 GHz) processor, with 512 MiB of PC3200 RAM while underclocking it to PC2700. The 80 GB drive is currently a Seagate Momentus 5400.2 ST9808211A, which runs at 5400 RPM with an 8 MiB cache. The SuperDrive is a MATSHITA DVD-R UJ-845, which supports +R DL burning, and may also have unofficial support for DVD-RAM. Apple did not revise the official specifications on their web site. This may be to avoid issues with discounting or discontinuing of old stock.
    Well .. whatever .. we use a MATSHITA DVD-R UJ-845C SuperDrive .. wouldn't that mean we have +R DL feature too ? .. probably not judging by the following explanations .. sort of .. and yes you could grab the mac_min.pdf service manual and do your own upgrading and overclocking as it pleases you .. try google for more info.
    PPS. .. http://www.macintouch.com/macmini11.html
    Mac Mini Part 11
    January 9, 2006
    Stealth Upgrade
    Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx
    I recently received the SuperDrive Mac Mini that I ordered from Amazon the day after Christmas. To my delight, my Mini contains a 1.5 GHz PPC and 64MB of video RAM.
    The SuperDrive is listed as a Panasonic UJ-845. According to Panasonic's web site this drive is supposed to allow DVD-RAM writing (and I assume reading). Has anyone attempted to use DVD-RAM discs with this drive under 10.4.3?
    Xxxxxx Xxxx
    I also have a new SuperDrive mini with the same specs, and note that the UJ-845 drive doesn't include DVD-RAM capability, though as Gordon notes the OEM Panasonic drive does. However, Panasonic's spec page is for the UJ-845-B drive, and I expect that the one in the mini is instead a special version of the UJ-845 that Panasonic made for Apple with DVD-RAM disabled. For some reason Apple doesn't seem to want to support DVD-RAM, which is a pity. I believe the drive will work with DVD-RAM discs, but treat them like DVD-RW, requiring complete erasure every time they're used, rather than allowing addition and subtraction of individual files, which is what makes DVD-RAM a great backup/exchange medium, especially for travelers.
    My new PowerBook came with an Apple-labeled Panasonic UJ-825-C drive, which System Profiler saw as simply "UJ-825" and which didn't include DVD-RAM although Panasonic's specs showed it; I replaced it with an 825-B I got on eBay, which System Profiler sees as "845-S" and which now does DVD-RAM even without Patchburn. Note that the 825 is two generations earlier than the current 845/846 drive (whose new feature is DL burning); DVD-RAM has been available for a long time, but Apple has been using special versions of the drives without it.
    How to exactly determine the capabilities of your drive: Insert a disc (any type, CD or DVD, but not a blank recordable disc that has to be formatted), open Disk Utility, and on the left side select the drive (not the disc in the drive), then look in the lower right side of the window where it says "Capabilities". You may have to widen the window to see the whole list, as it doesn't wrap for some reason. If it says "DVD-RAM" in the list, the drive should do DVD-RAM discs as they are meant to be used: like a 4GB floppy disk, they must be formatted once, then can be used as "random access media" (RAM). Doesn't matter what kind of disc you put in the drive; any type will make the drive appear in Disk Utility, which will then show its capabilities.
    FOLLOWUP: I opened up the Mac Mini, and found the SuperDrive is an Apple label "UJ-845C", presumably a special version of the 845 with DVD-RAM disabled, unlike the UJ-845-B spec'd at the Panasonic site.
    [MacInTouch]
    We just received a middle-model Mac Mini - 80GB/512MB/AirPort+Bluetooth/Tiger - ordered from Amazon (currently $519.99 after rebate) and were pleased to find that it is one of Apple's "stealth" upgrades, where the label belies the actual specifications. Apple shows it as a 1.42GHz model, but it's actually running at 1.5 GHz, according to System Profiler.
    It has a Seagate ST9808211A hard drive, which is a 5400-RPM model (better than the dog-slow 4200-RPM drives Apple started shipping sometime after the original Mini models debuted).
    The optical drive is a Matsushita CW-8124, a Combo drive with 24X CD writing and reading and the ability to read DVD-R and DVD-RW, as well as DVD-ROM, at 8x.
    System Profiler shows 64 MB of video RAM - double Apple's specified amount - for the "ATY,RV280" graphics card (ATI Radeon 9200) on an AGP bus, supporting display rotation and Quartz Extreme but not Core Image.
    (For what it's worth, we found that we could not connect a Dell 1704FPT to the digital video port while an analog video cable was connected; after removing the analog cable, the Dell works beautifully with the Mini's DVI video. The Dell display also worked fine with analog video via the adapter included with the Mini.)
    We also tried a WiebeTech Maxelerate hard drive enclosure but found it unpleasantly noisy, even in a special reduced-RPM version the company offers customers who raise the issue. By contrast, the miniStack we previously reviewed is virtually silent with the same hard drive inside.
    Xxx Xxxxxxx
    While this isn't the first time I've seen this type of 'error' from Apple, or other firms, this particular incident seems to have gone beyond the typical example, and I'm beginning to wonder if it is more than just an overlap in an otherwise complicated process.
    I've done my share of OEM documentation, including manuals, labels and cartons. I know how hard it is to maintain reality in this regard. But in this case, it seems to me that the mismatch between the inside and the outside of the package has gone beyond the norm, and I'm wondering if someone along the line has simply decided to live with it, rather than deal with it up front. I can see this saving money...changes cost more than just the ink - it takes time and planning to overcome a spec change and cover all the bases.
    I wouldn't be surprised if someone in a position to decide hasn't simply elected to run out the materials without implementing changes. After all, the customer gets more than they expect, which can be favorable publicity, and we all know the saying "any publicity is good, and good publicity is even better".
    On the other hand, it can be a minefield to fess up. Once word gets out, customers start hand-picking the good from the better, taking the higraded units and leaving the rest as floatsom. Or they buy the downgrade for less, then return it shortly thereafter, demanding the up while refusing to pay more.
    Let's just hope the sun keeps shining on this particular parade, and no one decides to claim fraud. All it would take is one competitor with a surplus of over-eager attorneys, and Apple would be forced to apologize for over-stuffing the golden goose.

  • 10.4 to 10.4.11 Combo Update (PPC) Issues - Will Not Sleep, Etc.

    I've been running Panther 10.3.9 successfully for a long time. There are a few programs I'd like to use that require Tiger and I realized that Tiger retail disks were getting hard to come by and expensive, so I decided to buy one when I found it for a decent price.
    I installed 10.4 (running repair disk and repair permissions prior) and then ran all the possible updates from Software Update. I did not select them all at once, most of them one at a time, while repairing permissions after each of them. Shortly after, things were not right.
    The first thing I noticed was that I could not put the computer to sleep with either the Apple > Sleep or through the settings in Energy Saver. Expose was flakey also, it seemed to work intermittently. The eject button on the keyboard also worked intermittently. Then, with Activity monitor I would see the following items not responding: loginwindow, System Preferences and Disk Utility (not necssarily at the same time, but at one time or another.) I suppose there may have been others issues, but these are just some of the things that I noticed.
    Startups, restarts and shutdowns took a long time. However, the progress bar on startups after the grey screen visually moved exceptionally fast and seemed odd.
    These issues also occurred in Safe Mode.
    An archive and install back to 10.4 produces a perfect running system, none of these problems occur.
    Since my initial update attempt, I've tried to update with the manually downloaded 10.4.11 Combo Update (PPC) with the exact same results (no sleep, expose issues, not responding issues, slow startups, restarts and shutdowns, etc.)
    I've archived and installed and updated four times - only keyboard, mouse, ethernet cable and apple speakers were attached. I'm currently sticking with 10.4 until I can find something I can do to troubleshoot this issue which may allow me to get a problem free update to 10.4.11.
    Note that my computer does lose the date and time settings when powered off and today I ordered a new PRAM battery. Could a dead battery be contributing to my issue, even though 10.4 is fine?
    Any suggestions would be appreciated!
    Julie

    ...only real low level kexts like old drivers for Universal Power Supplies & such, or real Haxies that dig into & change the OS somewhere.
    So, if old drivers and haxies might exist, how do I go about finding them? The only program that I have that I think may be considered a haxie is DockExtender 3.1.3, http://www.codetek.com/dockextender/ (stills seems to work.) It was in my startup items when I initially performed the combo update. Since then, only iCal related items are in my startup items. Subsequent update attempts have been ran when DockExtender was not active. Also, is it note worthy that I have a non-system icon for my hard drive?
    My feeling so far is that it's the HD or RAM, Tiger is twice as hard on & demanding of both.
    My hard drive is a Seagate 200 GB (utilizes only 128 GB) Ultra ATA/100 7200 RPM 8 MB Cache installed around March 2006. It still has a 2 year warranty. Are you speculating that it just may not be suited for Tiger?
    My memory consists of three strips of Corsair VS256MB133 G that I installed in February 2008 - these came as a warranty replacements due to a bad strip of another part number that they did not stock any more.
    I don't think it's any of the APPs you aren't running.
    In terms of my applications, so far I've updated Firefox (uninstalled some incompatible add-ons and themes.) Identified Font Doctor 5.1.2.9 has likely not being compatible, because it quits when selecting a folder to move troubled fonts to when diagnosing. I questioned Extensis Suitcase 10.2.2, but found out that if I trashed the Library/Caches/com.apple.ATS that the font activation errors were resolved. Safari has crashed on me a few times, but it is still version 2.0. It also crashed in 10.3.9, forcing me to use other browsers. Can I update Safari now? Software Update does not show Safari and I don't know if the combo update is the only was to update it. I'm still investigating other applications compatibility, but the true test won't happen until I run the combo update and am able to run my applications on 10.4.11.
    If you had a Firewire Drive to Install to & try, that would be great.
    I do have an external firewire drive, but it contains a bootable backup of my 10.3.9 system right now. I'd hate to tamper with it at this time, due to my current situation. I can check on borrowing one if necessary. Would this prove out the question regarding the hard drive and since it would be a clean install = no possible haxies or old drivers lingering around. I also have my old internal hard drive that I could use but, this would be the original from this mac and although it worked fine when I removed it, maybe it would not work well with Tiger.
    Thanks,
    Julie

  • Playlist will not sync/update correctly

    I have an iPod Touch.
    I use playlists very liberally. I have one that I just call "New Music". It's limited to the 25 songs most recently added. When I click on that playlist in iTunes, both under the general library, and under the iPod Touch, it shows the correct songs listed.
    But when I sync it up, a completely different group of songs comes up on the iPod itself, even though iTunes has the correct list. In fact, it's giving me the 25 OLDEST songs on the iPod, even though the list on iTunes has the right songs listed.
    Am I missing something obvious?

    I am having the same problem in that the content of my Smart Playlist on the computer does not match the content on the iPod Touch. My playlist is Newest 50 4+, or my newest 50 songs which have a 4 or 5 star rating.
    I tried each of the suggestions in the referenced bulletin and the only thing that works is to turn off 'Live Updating' in the Smart Playlist. The problem with this is that when I add new music to the iPod, I will listen and rate them as I go, so if one of these new songs is worthy of a 4 or 5 star rating, I should update the 'Newest 50 4+' playlist, but with live updating off, that won't work.
    Hoping that a real solution is found soon - this used to work until recently (latest update?).
    BTW, Using iTune 9.0.2 and v3.1.2 on the iPod Touch (running on a MacBook Pro)

  • Itunes update error

    Hey all:
    I have winxphome, avast antivirus, windows firewall. I do not have norton or Zonealarm. I have used itunes without problem for well over a year. I am trying to update to 6.0.2 but have this error each time. I have tried uninstall, reinstall, removing itunes and quicktime from registry, installing standalone quicktime, etc. I can only get itunes 4 to install and that does not help with music store. Has anyone seen and fixed a problem like this?
    Install Shield:
    Command Line parameters:
    /L Language ID
    /S Hide intialization dialog. For slient made use: /S
    /v /qn
    /V parameters to MsiExec.exe
    /Ua <url to InstMsiA.exe>
    /UW <url to InstMsiW.exe>
    /UM <url to msi package>
    Thank you to anyone who can help. I am at my wit's end.
    James
    [email protected]
    P.S. no other problems with installer (which is updated)
      Windows XP  

    well done proudmonk!
    I get the impression that my error on install is not uncommon.
    yeah ... it's not common either, though. i first saw this on a 5.0.0.35 install, and i think i've only seen about 20 reports in total since.
    (kudos for the WinRAR trick goes ultimately to tim duymich, who discovered it for us back in the 5.0.0.35 days. i just remember it for people.)
    if you've got the time and the inclination, you might try submitting some feedback to Apple on the issue. although there isn't a "technical feedback" mechanism for itunes, there is one for the ipod, which includes categories like bug reports:
    iPod Feedback
    ... and that seems like a worthy place to give feedback on this sort of issue (given the relationship between itunes and the ipod).
    love, b

  • Bapi in order to update table T056P

    Hi all,
    Is there any bapi or fm to update table T056P in order to enter interest reference rates values.
    Thanks and best regards

    Dear Marcelo,
    Thanks for your help, but we are adding new values to this table via transaction Enter Reference Interest Values (S_ALR_87002678), Accounting-> Financial Accounting->General Ledger-> Enviroment-> Current Settings->Enter Reference Interest Values. With these values,  afterwards we run ff_1 in order to calculate interests on bank accounts. We don´t have anything else on this sense and the process you mention seems to be for Treasury when you have further elements on this module.  I don´t know if it´s worthy and how to do it (where customize) in order to change from executing S_ALR_87002678 to tj05 and tj13. Would this improve our process and also have another transaction instead of ff_1 which is an old transaction that doesn´t allow our users many possibilities for calculating interest on bank accounts.
    Thanks for your help and regards

  • Schedule Approval of Updates

    I have WSUS 3.2.7600.226.
    Is there a way to schedule the approval of updates for a specific group?
    For example, I want certain updates approved at 10:30pm on a certain date for a specific computer group.
    Please let me know if this is possible and thanks for the help.

    Is there a way to schedule the approval of updates for a specific group?
    For example, I want certain updates approved at 10:30pm on a certain date for a specific computer group.
    No. You cannot schedule the *APPROVAL* of updates. Period. It is an interactive-only task.
    But, methinks it's not the approval that you're interested in scheduling, but rather the
    installation.
    So, with that presumption, let me offer this answer:
    It is NOT possible to schedule updates to install at half past the hour (with the WSUS native console); it is possible to schedule updates to install at the TOP of the hour.
    It is NOT possible to schedule installation by WSUS Target Group (with the WSUS native console).
    To schedule update installations to a specific group, use a GPO with the appropriate scheduled installation time and Security Group Filtering on that GPO to apply the GPO to the specific computer group (i.e. AD Security Group) of interest.
    However, it is worthy of note that my employer's Patch Manager product does allow the scheduling of approvals and installations with one-minute granularity, if
    approvals is really what you meant.
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    SolarWinds Head Geek
    Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
    My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
    http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
    The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

  • Business Catalyst and Social Media Updating

    I'm new to Business Catalyst and aside from link integration between BC hosted websites and Facebook, etc, is there an application that would allow automated post updates to the primary social media pages, similar to functionality that third-party email marketing service providers are offering. If not yet available, can anyone recommend an add-on service that might expand the social media reach. This seems to come up in every client consultation.

    Complain to the Attorney General about what? There is nothing in your story worth any such complaint. They will tell you the same.
    First you have payment difficulty so credit and the Edge program are not available to you. You have to be credit worthy to get any upgrade, unless you can pay full price for all those new devices.
    Can you?
    You are trying to get new contract plans, but since you are having paying on time and in full issues you will not get extended credit from any carrier.
    What I would do is go and port out to Boost or Virgin Mobile where you pay a reduced cost for each device and get unlimited everything for $40 to $50 a month, it is pre pay so if you don't pay you get cut off.
    Verizon although with the best coverage is also the highest priced.
    Good Luck

  • Still no firmware update for PC 0573802 on N96!!!

    I have had this phone for over a month and up till now there is no sign that Nokia have released a firmware upadate for product code 0573802. It is really odd that everyone has had a chance to update their firmware and I did not!! Is this product code wrong or Nokia forgot about it!!???
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    The truth is the product code 0573802 is Euro 1 Line 2 specific. It is sold by the CPW on Orange but it is not SP-locked. The trouble is that the genius at Nokia released the N96 on 100's of products code and seems that they totally lost the plot to keep track of it all. On the top the FOTA and NSU issue. Why would anyone need two methods of FW update. Unless you are very technical you will have to wait endlessly for Nokia to sort it out. I waited for 6 weeks and found another way to get the V11.101 but when I mentioned slightly how it is done the moderators removed my post. First they launched the N96 before even it is market worthy then they deprive the customers by not letting them to update. No wonder their share prices and quarterly profits are going downhill. I was a Nokia user for many years but now there are much better handsets out their and they dont cost you a fortune. I went through two n96 replacements and even had the 11.101 on one still it had its flaws. The N96 is rubbish and it is worthless. Someone from the Nokia might argue OW.
    I am stuck with my 18 months contract with Orange but got myself a BB Storm. It is not perfect but million times better than the N96.

  • Iphone 4 won't update to 4.2.10

    I have an iphone 4 that is currently running 4.2.6.  Ever since I got the phone (several months ago) whenever I sync the phone to itunes, it tells me that an update is available for download.  When I attempt to either "download" or "download and install", itunes downloads the file (4.2.10) and just as the file is completing / beginning to install, I get an error message stating "there was a problem downloading the software for itunes.  The network connection timed out." 
    I have tried to update this numerous times without success.  I originally thought that maybe the phone had the most current ios and this 4.2.10 was an update for non CDMA phones, but I recently checked several of my friends Verizon CDMA iphone 4 phones, and their ios is 4.2.10.
    Please help!

    I wouldn't worry about iOS 4.2.old at this late date.  All of the updates for iOS that Verizon received were merely security updates of which ...might affect one in a million users.  No harm in updating but other than a change in the build number, there's nothing in here that's any different from what was initially released to Verizon.  There were no new feature updates nor bug fixes in ANY of the releases past iOS 4.2.6.  (all of the good stuff was in iOS 4.3 of which we poor Verizon users were not worthy enough to receive.)  ANYWAY, we should be getting iOS 5 tomorrow.  I would attempt to load that one (assuming we get it) and if that fails, debug from this point.
    Yeah I'm a bit negative... but until something positive happens for us Verizon iPhone users... like getting iOS 5 tomorrow, I can't help it.  I'll believe it when I see it!

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to perform clean re-install windows7 on W510 on SSD

    Hi All, I am upgrading my laptop W510(4318) Touchscreen Laptop to SSD and would like to re-install windows 7 instead of cloning existing windows as i have numerous issues. Many says that factory recovery would not work and i dont have CD/DVDs of fact

  • Forwarding E-mail to .mac account

    Is there a limit on how many e-mail address you can forward to your .mac account? I have about 10 and I am having trouble with receiveing my mail. iMac   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • Java Programming, 100 locker problem

    hello i am intro to programming in java.. i have a problem from my teacher. 100 lockers are all open in an array. 1 person goes in changes all to closed. 2 every other. 3 every third, 4 every fourth and so on until 100. could some1 give me a walktrho

  • Strange Blueish cast after Exporting

    I color correct my 1080p clips with 3 way color corrector. When there are white portions, I usually use the eye dropper of the hilights to make sure I get a pure white. Then I batch export them to Pro Res 422 HQ. When I check them later (pre check in

  • Google Sync Issues - Mulptiple copies - Not Deting

    Hi Google Calender multiple copies Item is altered to different time. Both old and new version remain in pre 2 Maybe 4 of same item sa finally give in and change one copy to Yahoo event, and delete all others. Leave calender and return. thee deleted