10.9.2 is so slow on a MAC PRO 2011

OMG
i took a chance and upgraded from 10.6.8 on my fully optimized MAC PRO
on the IMAC 2012  things go faster
what a fool i am
why are things slower on the MAC pro
and faster with the older system??
i repeat OMG

How much RAM installed in your Mac Pro,
How full is your Mac's hard drive?
Do you run any antivirus software on your Mac? Antivirus software can slow down the normal operation of OS X as well having negative performance effects on OS X and other adverse system issues.
Do you have apps like MacKeeper or any other maintenance apps like CleanMyMac 1 or 2, TuneUpMyMac or anything like these apps, installed on your Mac?
These types of apps, while they appear to be helpful, can do too good a job of data "cleanup" causing the potential to do serious data corruption or data deletion and render a perfectly running OS completely dead and useless leaving you with a frozen, non-functional Mac.
Plus, these type of apps aren't really necessary.
They really aren't.
There are manual methods to clear off unnecessary data off of your Mac that are safer and you have complete control over your Mac and not just leave a piece of auto cleaning software in charge of clearing off data off of your Mac.
Their potential of causing OS X issues outweighs the implied good and benefits these types of hard drive or memory "cleaning" apps are written to do.
Plus, the software company's that write these apps make it hard to easily uninstall these apps if something DOES go wrong and these apps work in a way where you have no recovery or revert function to return your Mac back to its former, working state in the event something does go wrong.
It is best to never download and install these types of apps.
The risk to your system and data is too great a risk!
Your Mac Pro could have Mavericks incompatible hardware and/or software.
You may need to update all of your third party software if there are OS X Mavericks updates that can be applied. You may need to, ACTUALLY,  go to the third party developers' websites if there are no updates through the Mac App Store.
Update all of your Web browser Internet plugins, also.
Also, if you have any connected third party devices, like non-Apple, third party keyboards, mice, drawing tablets, hubs, card  readers, etc, you need to go to the device maker's website and update the drivers for these devices to OS X Mavericks compatible versions, if available or needed.

Similar Messages

  • Adobe bridge is slowing down my mac pro how do I fix?

    Adobe bridge is slowing down my mac pro how do I fix

    I have a new Mac pro
    If you are still within your 15 day return period,  nicely explain that you may return the computer without iDVD. That usually does the trick.  (Ask to speak to a senior advisor.)
    408-996-1010
    If that doesn't work you can purchase iLife 11  (includes iDVD) on disk (don't get the download) for about $39.
    http://www.amazon.com/Apple-MC623Z-A-iLife-VERSION/dp/B003XKRZES/ref=sr_1_1?ie=U

  • Adobe Bridge CC very slow on New Mac Pro

    Im running both Bridge CC (6.1.0.115) and CS6 on my New Mac Pro
    the Bridge CC is obviously slower than Bridge CS6.
    CC also very easy to get the spinning ball every click on Bridge CC, very annoying.
    Also Im using Dell 4K monitor, If I load monitor size preview will be really slow, even on the New Mac Pro. is there any way We can set a specific size of the preview? which can speedup the preview loading

    If you go to the menu File > Project Settings > General and set the Renderer to Software Only, any change?
    MtD

  • Why is Compressor way slower on 1 Mac Pro

    This is about Compressor 3.5.3 but it's not really about the version.
    I have two identical MacPros 2,1 models both running OSX 10.6.8 and Final Cut 7.0.3 and Compressor 3.5.3.
    The only difference in the machine is one has 20 gigs of ram and the other has 24 gigs.
    I'm capturing BetaSP tape, 30 min loads, and then converting it to ProRes LT with Compressor. Same settings in both instances of Compressor.
    I load 12 captures into one machine's Compressor and hit submit. It finishes in a little over two hours.
    I load only 5 captures into the other machine's Compressor and hit submit. It finished in over 5 hours.
    They are both 8-core machines with the same processors and are identical otherwise. I can't believe that 4 more gigs of ram would make that much difference.
    Also they are sourcing off identical raids as well and writing back to identical raids.  Why is one machine so majorly SLOW!

    Hi
    How much free space is there on the Main Hard Disks ?
    • Exactly the same ?
    • one is 5Gb or less the other 100Gb or more
    I never go less than 25Gb for work with interlaced SD-Video Quality
    think that about 4-5 times more will work OK for full quality HD progressive - may be ?
    What Processes are running in back ground ?
    • Time Machine
    • File Vault
    • Internet
    others
    NON on my Video Mac
    else things that matters reg. speed and performance (for iMovie/iDVD - but are really general)
    TO GET IT TO WORK SLIGHTLY FASTER
    • Minimum of 25Gb free space on Start-Up hard disk
    • No other programs running in BackGround e.g. Energy-Saver
    • Don’t let HD spin down or be turned off (in Energy-Save)
    • Move external/secondary hard disks that are not to be used to Trash - To be disconnected/turned off
    • Goto Spotlight and set the rest of them under Integrity (not to be scanned)
    • Set screen-saver to a folder without any photo - then make an active corner (up right for me) and set
    pointer to this - turns on screen saver - to show that it has nothing to show
    • No File Vault on - Important
    • NO - TimeMachine - during iMovie/iDVD work either ! IMPORTANT
    • Lot's of icons on DeskTop/Finder also slows down the Mac noticeably
    • Start a new User-Account and log into this and iMovie get's faster too - if a project is in a hurry
    • And let Mac run on Mains - not just on battery
    Yours Bengt W

  • Can too many Photos slow down a Mac Pro?

    Hi, I have atleast 100,000 photos on my pc, would this many photos slow down a 2.66GHz quad core mac pro with 6 gigs of memory? thanks

    I have 60,000. I use non-boot drive of course for data. Some people have huge music and video libraries of 2TB spanning 2-3 drives on stripped RAIDs.
    Mac Pro and OS X really likes RAM, and the base for DDR3 8-core is to have 6 DIMMs and I'd go with 6 x 2GB, either Apple or 3rd party RAM, then add 3 x 640GB drives (WD Black Caviar). Stripe two, even if you partition it as 400GB each. http://www.barefeats.com/nehal04.html
    And keep the boot drive to OS and applications primarily.
    A nice guide:
    http://macperformanceguide.com/Reviews-MacProNehalem.html
    CineBench 10.1 and Geekbench results
    http://www.barefeats.com/nehal03.html

  • Slow boot on Mac Pro

    I've got a mid-2010 Mac Pro that has a very long boot time.  Here is what it is doing:
    Power on
    Blank screen for 35 sec then boot sound + grey screen
    At 1 minute I get the apple
    At 1:10 get the spinning circle
    At 1:39 get the login icons
    This seems far far to long for this machine.  It has awesome specs so I would think it is a lot faster:
    2x6 core CPU's
    96GB RAM
    1TB SSD boot drive
    12 TB internal stripped volume
    Two ESATA cards with 5-bay Drobo's on it
    Whatever fast video card they came with by default
    I've tried reducing the ram to 64GB (which was once the source of a problem with an OS upgrade).
    I've disconnected the ESATA drives.
    I've removed the ESATA cards.
    I've reset the PRAM
    I've reset the SMC
    The ESATA cards in particular with the Drobo are VERY slow, so that is why I thought pulling them might resolve the issue (they don't have great support in the Mac Pro, but they do work).
    I'm at wits end here.  This thing should scream.  My MBP retina 15"  with SSD boots very fast and I would have expected the Mac Pro to boot similarly fast.
    The SSD is attached to the same cable that the DVD-RW drive is on (i.e. that cable has two heads and the SSD is on one of them).  Could this be the issue?
    Any help?

    Still has quite a bit of space free.
    No, that is what Mac OS X says. But it is calculating for Rotating Drives.
    Mac OS X deletes a block and adds that block to the Free List (it does not erase it). The amount of reported Free space it reports is adjusted.
    Without TRIM, the drive is not notified that the data in that block has been deleted. On a Rotating drive that has blocks pre-allocated and pre-numbered, that is not an issue.
    Without TRIM on an SSD, which requires an erased SuperBlock to write anything, it is still carrying the deleted data as if it were good. When a write comes down, it tries to find a Free SuperBlock to write into, and when they run low, it is forced to revert to Read-Modify-Write cycles (much slower) to get anything done.
    If you have run a Speed Test, you have written many blocks to your SSD. Unless TRIM is enabled, all that data are still carried along, even though Mac OS X will Never reference them again except to overwrite those blocks (which the SSD does not literally do, it writes a SuperBlock instead).
    However, when I ran a disk utility repair on the old one mounted in an external ESATA dock, it didn't give the message Trimming unused blocks".
    Enabling TRIM for a specific Drive makes a change in Mac OS X, not in the drive or the Driver that is loaded off the drive. In order to effect the Big TRIM, you would need to have ALSO Installed and Enabled TRIM for that drive on your alternate Mac OS X. TRIM cannot be Installed in a Recovery_HD (at least, not yet).

  • Slow Performance On Mac Pro 12-Core

    Hello Everyone,
    I just recently purchased a 2012 Mac pro 12-Core and i have been getting unbelievabley slow performance with it. I am using Premiere Pro CS6 and it seems that the footage can sometimes get a bit laggy at times and not play back smoothly, sometimes rendering can take a bit of time as well. However here are the specs of my system:
    Mac Pro 12-Core 2.4GHz (2.67GHz Turbo Boost)
    40GB of Ram
    ATI 5770 Graphics Card
    1TB scratch disk (with a user on the drive that i can boot into)
    OCZ 120GB Vertex 3 SSD OS/APPS drive
    First question i would like to get answered once and for all.. Did i make a bad decision by purchasing a computer with such a slow clock speed (2.4GHz)?? I figured since The new editing software is switching to 64bit it shouldn't depend on clock speed anymore? (i just want to be sure that i purchased a more than capable machine) However i will be buying a Samsung 840 Pro Series 256GB SSD Drive for Scratch within the month. (I dont have the budget to buy a Raid controller yet to utilize 6GB/s transfer speeds, so 1 Fast SSD drive will have to do for now)
    I should mention the current SSD drive im on right now only has 13GB remaining, would that affect performance? Also, my 1Tb media drive is filled up with CRAP from my previous computer (Migration transferred EVERYTHING to that drive, only 120GB remains) would that drive with the media im working with affect performance too? Also just as a test, i took some footage from my GoPro Hero 3 camera and put it on my SSD to see if that would eliminate the lag, but still lag was present in Premiere.. (the footage was in a crappy .M4P format, so that may have affected it, but I dont know)
    Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!
    -Thanks in Advance!

    The new editing software is switching to 64bit it shouldn't depend on clock speed anymore?
    Wrong, clock speed is everything.
    I should mention the current SSD drive im on right now only has 13GB remaining, would that affect performance?
    No, not really.
    Also, my 1Tb media drive is filled up with CRAP from my previous computer (Migration transferred EVERYTHING to that drive, only 120GB remains) would that drive with the media im working with affect performance too?
    When fill rates go up, performance goes down. With almost 90% fill rate, the disk performs only at around 50% of a new disk.
    Two disks is absolute bare minimum, and your cores will constantly be waiting for the disks to read or write data, sitting idle most of the time.
    Also just as a test, i took some footage from my GoPro Hero 3 camera and put it on my SSD to see if that would eliminate the lag, but still lag was present in Premiere..
    GoPro material requires a very fast computer, which yours is not with the low clock speed, outdated E5620 CPU's, only two disks, and a non-CUDA capable video card.
    Take a look at the PPBM5 Benchmark and look at the system at rank # 854, which is a MacPro, very similar to your system, dual E5620, AMD video card, less memory but uses three disks.
    So, your system would be around the same rank as the one above, among the slowest 25% of all systems and something like 10 - 15 times slower than a fast system. You tax your system to the extreme with the GoPro Hero3 material, and the consequence is the slow performance you see.
    Sorry, not much you can do, other than get a new system. If you sell it now, it may get you a price, good enough to get a much faster Windows system and maybe even keep the change.  Simply said, you bought a MacPro for € 3.5 K, sell it for € 3 K, buy a PC for € 2.5 K that is around 5-6 times faster and your loss is recovered.
    However i will be buying a Samsung 840 Pro Series 256GB SSD Drive for Scratch within the month
    What a pity the MacPro does not have SATA 6G ports, only SATA 3G, because then that SSD will run at almost half speed.

  • Slow render speed:  Mac Pro vs. Mac Mini (FCP Vs. FCE)

    About a year ago I purchased a Mac mini (2gb ram, 2.0 dual core processor running OS 10.4) and using Final Cut Express. Understandable, rending and exporting took awhile.
    A week ago I upgraded to a Mac Pro (10gb ram, 2.8 8-core processors running OS 10.5) and Final Cut Pro Studio 6. I assumed that I would see a rather dramatic decrease in in the time it takes to render (and to export).
    However, the I am seeing virtually no difference whatsoever in rendering speed between the Mac mini running FCE and the Mac Pro running FCP. I'm very disappointed.
    What gives? I'm editing virtually the same material and it's just as slow as before.
    Any ideas anyone on what may be causing this?

    I am generally using SD video imported (log and transfer) directly from the hard drive of a Sony HDR-SR12 camera, although I also use captured video from a Panasonic HVX200 camera. My "Easy Setup" setting has been DV-NTSC for both Final Cut Express and now Final Cut Studio.
    The rendering that I'm talking about, for example, is when I put an effect on a video track that requires rendering before I can play it.
    I'm then typically exporting the finished video to a Quick Time movie DV-NTSC setting.
    Again, there is no improvement at all in the time it takes to render and export using the Mac PRO vs. the Mac mini using identical settings. I would think there should be a significant improvement.

  • Very slow speeds with Mac Pro talking to a Ubuntu Raid Server

    So I have an environment where mainly macs and a couple Windows PCs use a Ubuntu Raid 50 file server. When attempting to access the server the Mac Pros take typically 1 minute to view the file structure and sometimes timeout, the Windows machines take about 1 second. Also this seems to affect copying and deleting which takes much longer from the Mac side. The server is setup simply with a samba mount to allow access.
    Any suggestions for how I can attack this issue? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Colin

    Nope. The Macs and PCs are on the same subnet and plugged into the same switch, from the wall.

  • Render times very slow on new Mac Pro and Premiere CC

    Hi there
    I have a brand spanking new Mac Pro  (specs below) working off a G Studio r 24 TB array. Rendering anything in Premiere is taking an age (2 minutes timeline is taking 30 minutes). I am cutting 4k Sony F5 footage (XAVC). I have done tests with 1080 material and this doesn't make any difference.
    I have spoken to Adobe support and reset permissions plus all the basic workarounds suggested: but there has been no improvement. I was due a call back but have not heard anything. 
    Can anyone suggest a solution - i have several important deadlines coming up, and can't really deal with the downtime.
    I understand 3rd party apps take longer, but even with PP effects, rendering is taking way too long: especially with a super fast system like this.
    Regards
    Louis
    YOSEMITE 10.10.3
      Model Name: Mac Pro
      Model Identifier: MacPro6,1
      Processor Name: 8-Core Intel Xeon E5
      Processor Speed: 3 GHz
      Number of Processors: 1
      Total Number of Cores: 8
      L2 Cache (per Core): 256 KB
      L3 Cache: 25 MB
      Memory: 64 GB
      Boot ROM Version: MP61.0116.B11
      SMC Version (system): 2.20f18
      Illumination Version: 1.4a6
      Serial Number (system): F5KPD0DDF694
      Hardware UUID: 8975F4BE-0140-583C-9615-E3BD60BEC8F2

    If you go to the menu File > Project Settings > General and set the Renderer to Software Only, any change?
    MtD

  • FCP render slow on new Mac pro?

    New Macpro does not seem any faster than PPC Quad.
    Today I had to render out a 2 hour 20 minute program to Apple TV codec and it took 3 hours.
    The FCP window itself seems sluggish on Hide and launch.
    I checked Activity monitor and it tells me CPU=180 Real Memory=252 and V Mem=1.73
    I have no idea how to read an activity monitor- does the reading seem normal?
    I am running on the latest Macpro 8 core 3.0 with 16 gigs of memory.
    I was told this would be super fast.
    Why doesn't FCP use more of the available memory?
    I always hear people say- buy more memory, but it doesn't seem to be speeding things up.
    User error?

    FCP is a 32 bit application and as such doesn't make use of anything over 2.5GB of ram. Once you add in the OS frameworks it really only can make use of 4GB total. Ram beyond 4GB is useful in Motion for RAM previews as well as running multiple applications but it isn't going to make FCP any faster.
    If you want to speed up codec conversions use Compressor and learn how to set up virtual clusters. You can set up 4 in your machine and each will act as a singular instance of compressor all working together to speed things along.
    Good luck,
    x

  • Slow internet on Mac Pro?

    Any idea why my 2009 (Nehalem) Mac Pro gets a 9.74 download speed on Speedtest.net but my 2009 MBP and 2011 MBA both get speeds above 20?
    All are obviously on the same wireless network and all are running Lion... could it be the Airport Card in the Mac Pro? Heard their placement inside the machine has caused reception issues...
    Any thoughts appreciated.

    I just got my Mac Pro tower this week. 2.66 quad with 6 gigs of RAM. I'm having the exact same issue. I ran my MacBook Pro (early model w/2 gig RAM) next to my new Mac Pro tower - both working wirelessly. My MacBook Pro is loading the exact same pages 2-3 times faster than my brand new Mac Pro tower.
    I've been using a program called Mr. T1 to measure my internet speed on each machine - http://198.170.88.241/coin-operated.com/?p=777
    It is really disappointing and upsetting to see my brand new machine getting smoked by a 3 year old laptop. What gives?

  • PAINFULLY slow Mac Pro 2.66

    About a week or so ago I bought an Apple refurb Mac Pro 2.66
    It is replacing a Dual 1.8 G5 with 2GB of RAM. My plan was to "suffer" with 1GB of RAM in the Mac Pro for a while until RAM prices went down. At the same time I bought a MacBook 1.83/512MB to replace my iBook 1.33/512MB laptop.
    Right to the point, the Mac Pro pages out of control, all the time. Even closing windows causes extreme paging. To put it into perspective, my Mac Pro pages significantly more than my old iBook that only had 512MB of RAM. It is so slow I can't even do work. I was going out of my mind. Then, I figured I'd boot the Mac Pro off of the MacBook and run all the disk utilities I could find just to make sure nothing was wrong. Oh I guess I should also say first that the MacBook is just as slow, although with 512 - 64 MB of RAM, it has an excuse at least. So I booted the Mac Pro off the MacBook over Firewire, and started running tests. All the tests were fine. The directory wasn't scrambled. The disk was barely fragmented, no volume problems at all, S.M.A.R.T. tests all passed. But then I noticed something. The machine was no longer paging. Booted off the MacBook's drive, it was acting like a machine with 1GB of ram. It has its slow moments but over all it was fine. Apps opened super fast. It was as fast as I thought the Mac Pro was going to be. So at this point I started to get suspicious of the hard drive. Despite passing all tests. So I googled it's model number and found a manufacturers spec sheet. The first thing I noticed was this quote:
    "Super-quiet drive is almost inaudible. Difference between idle and seek can hardly be detected by human ear, making drive operation almost silent."
    My drive spins up nice and quiet, but seeking is so loud, I can hear it across the room. So now I'm really starting so suspect something is wrong. Both computers have been so slow, I've barely been using them lately but I have much work to do.
    --also as an out of order note, I do run Adobe software, but all the slowness observations happen even when running ONLY intel native apps. Running PPC stuff just makes it worse but its still painfully bad without them.
    So hows this for a theory. I've been told that intel code is optimized more for fast execution likes larger amounts of ram, so a system short on ram feels the pinch more. That, plus the fact that 64MB is being used for video RAM, is making my MacBook legitimately slow. The Mac Pro on the other hand, has a hard drive problem which is causing super slow paging. So I'm hoping that once the drive is replaced, I'll be able to work on the machine normally, or almost normally.
    To give you an idea of how bad the paging is: remember when we used system 7 and would click on a program, and stop everything, walk into the other room, and come back when the application was opened. Thats what I do now on a 1 GB machine. Even switching between apps can take a minute or two.
    What do ya think?

    Unless you yourself did a full fresh clean install of the OS, that is the first thing to do.
    Second, don't migrate any files except data to the Mac Pro. And definitely not PPC program files, install those, but don't use Migration Assistant.
    It sounds like your system is just suffering from "molasses effect" of a poorly installed and updated system, and that someone used Migration Assistant on it.
    2GB of RAM is nice, but if you are running heavy files or memory hungry, 4GB would be nice.
    You may want to setup a boot drive, a scratch drive, and a data drive to help spread the work over multiple drives. Also, the OEM drives do tend to be slow and sluggish, and you want your boot drive to be your best, whether 300GB or 500GB best of class, or 10K Raptor.
    Wipe the drive, zero-all, do a fresh system install and update, and I think you'll find it behaves. Clone the system before installing 3rd party so you have a known good system state and don't have to customize everything again.

  • Mac Pro extremely slow in Logic score

    For many years Logic score has been neglected. The score function is slow, crashes easily etc.
    SO I decided to buy the fastest Mac Pro, installed everything clean from the beginning, even made new template songs, and guess what: as slow as an Atari in 1992!
    Try it yourself: move a note or sign in a score from one spot to another with the mouse, and it takes Logic nearly 3 seconds to calculate its new position.
    Does anyone have suggestions how to live with this?
    I go back to my G5 dual 2.5, which has the same problem, but less slow than the Mac Pro.

    Not sure of your experience, of score in L.P.
    But i know, the wait will be over, in a matter of days weeks are a few months, then we be flying, just remember apple got the best on board.
    As to logic/pro almost 5years no major up-lift, and just guessing why logic/pro is limited to two 2ghz of samples, 5years ago apple computer did,nt use more than 2ghz of memory so there was no need to step the limit up on logic/pro, where as, at that time, it was the dual 1.2 g4 was the fastest mac and so with the fastest mac today takes 16 ghz so i cant see it not being at least 8ghz of samples, for logic, even if we dont use 8ghz, it only means it will work more smooth, just a bit of my two cent, this have nothing to do with lepoard, being 64, and will run twice as, we are talking Major-D.A.W. upgrade, bug fix, new feature, auto-rewire, editing in audio nice and easy like the pro's with pitch & time, better compressor, syn, piano, last but not least give m-audio a bring in with delta 1010 being pci-e .
    powerM\G4-1.25DUAL   Mac OS X (10.4.4)   I used dellta 1010 soundcard.prologic 7,1.5 gigs MEMORY.EXTENAL SYNS. MACKIE32-08 Mixing Desk.

  • Mac Pro has slowed to a crawl - Please Help Me!

    Hello,
    For some time now my Wireless or Wired Internet connection using my Mac Pro has slowed to almost nothing. For example, This page took 5 mins to load and now Internet use has become unusable.
    I feel its my Mac Pro because all other Apple Computer run very fast wirelessly. I have (2) New iMac's (1) Apple TV and (1) Apple iPhone. All stream and surf the Internet blazingly fast.
    My Mac Pro is constantly being redirected to other sites (mostly **** related) and a huge amount of Pop ups (even though pop ads are disabled in Safari). All Internet browsers perform the same on my Mac Pro or ANYTHING Internet related including WoW, Software updates or even iTunes Music Down loads.
    I really feel that in some way (which is shocking) I am infected with "something" that is making my computer crawl on the Internet. Redirection of websites is just now very aggravating.
    I am looking at the (2) Original Disks that came inside the Mac Pro Box. I'm seriously considering wiping my system clean and starting from scratch.
    I currently hold NOTHING on my Factory 320GB HD other than programs.
    I have installed (2) 1TB drives and created a RAID slice thus creating a single HD icon on my desktop that reads 1.8TB. Thats is where all my Music, Photos, and Movies reside.
    My question is....
    When I wipe my system will that RAID be broken? Will I lose everything on those 2 drives or will using the restore CD's leave all that information in tact?
    Please let me know before I proceed.
    Thank you for your time.
    John

    Your RAID won't be touched. But back it up today if you haven't yet!
    I use Firefox for security with noscript and some other filters, but I also hardened the router firewall to manually block services, ports and add rules - both incoming and outgoing.
    You might want to look at LittleSnitch or NetBarrier and do some logging.
    I've seen/heard where older routers and modems were fine, but not with Mac Pro or with Intel Macs in general and needed to be replaced or firmware updated. Problems with the latest updates for Airport have been seen by some, and worth checking into - on forums, news sites or hit google.
    And of course check what processes are getting loaded and run; manually delete caches, history, metadata, even the bookmarks cache.
    ~/Library/Caches/Metadata
    There are issues with fake Flash updates; normal sites (like CNN) suffering from SQL-injection. Best to run with javascript off for now.
    Might want to look into ClamXav and other malware protection. But I would switch and see how Firefox and Opera behave. And turn off java, script, and plug-ins while you consider your options and try to find out why.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to change the standard query "Create a Master Agreement" by a custom one

    Hello Sourcing CLM experts, I would need to replace the standard query displayed when the user tries to create a Master Agreement by a custom query to filter the MA types according to some criteria: According to this post: Re: Create security profile

  • DO NOT INSTALL 7.0.1 ITS NO GOOD

    I keep checking in and seeing how things are going still the same problems in this board. By now you should know that iTunes 7 is as good as viral and you should return to 6.0.5. Here is a short list of some things you will notice when you install iT

  • Manual sorting in album in iPhoto 11 resets itself when I close iPhoto. Any suggestions?

    I'm using iPhoto 11 and am trying to combine photos from three different cameras (so slightly different date/time stamp). I have copied all photos into an album, then sorted by date. Because of variation in date/time I need to sort manually to combin

  • OID multiple plug in with AD issue

    Hi folks, I have a problem here, I have two AD directories a1.domain1.com and a2.domain2.com I don't have problem configuring external authentication against multiple domains by [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28196_01/idmanage.1014/b15995/odip_

  • Reverse value order horizontal axis keynote chart

    Hi I am trying to create a chart that shows rankings (so a lower number is better), so I want the low number to show the highest column. So I guess the zero should be at the top of the Y axis. Does anyone know how to invert the values on Y to show ze