101 GR/IR wrong values

Dear all.
PO rate: 159.00 [Not changed since PO creation]
GR done in June having GR/IR = according to 162.64
In table MBEWH
Year    Period      MAP
2009      01         159.00
2009      02         159.00
2009      03         162.64
For current period [04/2009] MAP = 146.87
My question is:
1. Why GR made in June having GR/IR posting according to 162.64, but GR is valuated by PO Price only??
2. If GR is done today, which price will it take up, either 159.00 [PO Price] or 146.87 [Current MAP]
While posting MIRO for GR made in June, GR/IR = according to 162.45 is coming in simulation. But in amount field it is according to 159.00. So unable to post MIRO
Pls suggest on priority
Tushar

Dears,
1. No any amendment in PO Price.
2. Taxes in PO are BED/ECS/Secess& VAT. That's it.
3. After simulting MIRO, GR/IR = according to 162.64 [Previous period MAP], but taxes are calculating as per PO Price= 159.00. We use GR-Based IV
Pls suggest solution
Thanks
Tushar

Similar Messages

Webi base on BW query based on Infoset comes back with wrong values

Hello:
I have a Webi report on an OLAP Universe, on Bex Query.
The bex query is based on 1 INFOSET.
When I run the webi report the values that comes back a totally wrong values.
The correct results are not brought back.
When I do a test with crystal reports to the infoset, I can see the correct values. (I'm aware crystal uses different drivers).
The test is BW query designer, and crystal brings back proper values from Infoset based BW query.
Webi on Infoset based BW Query comes back with wrong data.
query is simple.
Pull in 3 attributes, 3 key figures, where componentkey = "111"
I get 36 rows in Crystal and 36 rows in Bex Analyzer, 36 rows in BW query designer (web analyzer).
I get many rows in webi (almost like a CARTENSIAN product).
I search a round this forum but still did not see a conclusive answer to this problem.
But I see another thread that several others faced this same issue without a resolution.
My environment.
BOE XI 3.1 SP2
No fix packs
SAP IK 3.1 SP2
HPUX-IA64
Thanks in advance for any help.
Dwayne

Was this problem ever solved?
I am having a similar problem with an infoset based query.
I have created the BW infoset, and confirmed that the correct data is returned from the underlying infoproviders. A simple BW query on that infoset yields the same results.
Create the universe, and then the WEBI, and WEBI now shows hundreds of records where I expect 10. Data is being returned in WEBI that definitely shouldn't be there. It's almost like the restrictions applied in the characteristic restriction area of my BW query are being ignored, even if I include them in the WEBI query.
Cheers,
Andrew

Full Points sure: Wrong values populating in report (BEX)

Hi Gurus,
I got an Issue on CRM Report. Report is populating wrong values.
In the report, We have structure called Opportunity (in that structure fields are New opportunity, Close opportunity, Win opportunity and Open opportunity) in query and One key figure called Revenue.
On revenue we have one condition with variables. But, in that condition everything is fine.
The Condition Screen is like this:
Radio Button: Single characteristic is selected
"Opportunity Sales ID" selected in Characteristics.
Keyfigures:
Revenue                      New Opp                      TOP N             TOP X OPP
Revenue                      Open Opp                     TOP N             TOP X OPP
Revenue                      WINS                           TOP N             TOP X OPP
Revenue                      Lost                             TOP N              TOP X OPP
everything is right in this: If we select top 10 opportunities. we are getting wrong values
for ex: if we select top 10 Opportunities (in the selection screen) means REVENUES.
We are getting 12 values. 10 values are correct remaining 2 values are wrong..
There is no Update routine for revenue keyfield.
Can please suggest me on this What are possibilities for wrong values ...
FULL POINTS SURE FOR THIS
THANKS,
KN

Hi All,
Can anybody answer... this...
thanks,
KR

Updated CODE1 is showing wrong values in 2LIS_05_QE1

Hi all,
I'm using 2LIS_05_QE1 extractor to report over qualitative data in BW. When the code of the characteristics is updated, the extractor takes 2 records, before and after images. The extractor is gathering wrong values for the CODE1 field in the before image.
REQUEST     DATAPAKID     RECORD     ROCANCEL     PPLNKN     MERKNR     CODE1     GRUPPE1     ZHLNSTAT
REQU_4KVR0APSV0RSZ7N70IOR0F95L     1     5120          5     40     0     CIBAU038     1
REQU_4KPIA4UG5G1IKN6DE3XFWKIS9             3     4045     X     5     40     0     CIBAU038     -1
REQU_4KPIA4UG5G1IKN6DE3XFWKIS9             3     4046          5     40     75     CIBAU038     1
REQU_4KYF8YNIEMXNZI7P2Y5BM21W9     3     4045     X     5     40     0     CIBAU038     -1
REQU_4KYF8YNIEMXNZI7P2Y5BM21W9     3     4046          5     40     75     CIBAU038     1
We have changed the characteristic two times, now we can see two of the before images with the ROCANCEL field marked with = 'X'. The problem appears in the second before image which is not taking the actual value of the CODE1 field (75), instead is showing the value in zero. Then, when I report over the key figure in the table above ZHLNSTAT (quantity of values) the results are showing 2 values for CODE1=75 and -1 values for CODE1=0.
Any ideas?

I have checked Datasource and CODE1 is not a hidden field...apart from this field there are other fields too which I can see in Datasource in R/3 about dont see them in BW ....
Please let me know what could be wrong.
Thanks,
Murtuza.
Edited by: Murtuza Morwala on Jun 27, 2009 7:36 AM

HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01 has wrong value!

HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01 has wrong value!
Hello again,
I have a search page in my app (here the user defines the search criteria) P1.
The page branches to P130, where the result is shown. This second page contains a region of type 'SQL Query (PL/SQL Function Body Returning SQL Query)'. The code for this dynamic query is 231 lines of code, so I want to spare you scrolling through it here . What it basically does is generating SQL QRY's such as the following:
select     distinct(sq.SAMPLE_ID) XXX,
'ID: '||sq.SAMPLE_ID||'
' ||'Type: '||sq.SAMPLE_TYPE||'
' ||'Collection Date: '||sq.COLLECTION_DATE SAMPLE_INFO,
'Aliquots (T/A): '||to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_TOTAL)|| '/' ||to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE)||'
' ||'Volume (T/A): '||to_char(sq.VOLUME_TOTAL,'990D00')|| '/' ||to_char(sq.VOLUME_AVAILABLE,'990D00') AVAILABILITY,
'Age: '||sq.PATIENT_AGE||'
' ||'Gender: '||sq.PATIENT_SEX||'
' ||'Bloodtype: '||sq.BLOOD_TYPE||'
' PATIENT_INFO,
DML_SERVICE.get_Diagnoses(sq.SAMPLE_ID) DIAGNOSES,
DML_SERVICE.get_Medications(sq.SAMPLE_ID) MEDICATIONS,
DML_SERVICE.get_Interferences(sq.SAMPLE_ID) INTERFERENCES,
DML_SERVICE.get_LabData(sq.SAMPLE_ID) LABDATA,
decode(to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE), '0', null, htmldb_item.text(1, '1', 1, 2)) ORDER_QTY,
decode(to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE), '0', null, htmldb_item.checkbox(2,sq.SAMPLE_ID)) ORDER_ME
from SEARCH_V01 sq
where sq.DIAGNOSIS = 'D-Dimer'
order by 1 desc
The DML_SERVICE functions just return a string(Varchar2). At the right side of the report I have two columns, one with a textfield (ORDER_QTY, default: 1) and one with a checkbox (ORDER_ME) for each line.
For each line where the checkbox is checked, a process (On Submit - after Comp and Val) places the order for the requested quantity (this is done by inserting an Order ID into the ALIQUOTS table -> see bold update statement below).
The process follows:
declare
alq_qty number;
alq_id number;
cnt number;
begin
cnt := 0;
for i in 1..HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02.count
loop
select count(*) -- set alq_qty to number of available alq's
into alq_qty
from ALIQUOTS a
where a.SAMPLE_ID = HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)
and a.ORDER_ID = 0;
insert into D_DEBUG (ID, DD) values (1, 'wanted: ' || HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i) || ' available: ' || alq_qty); -- REMOVE!!!
if alq_qty > to_number(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i)) then -- if there are enough alq's
alq_qty := to_number(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i)); -- set alq_qty to number of ordered alq's
end if;
for n in 1..alq_qty
loop
select min(ID)
into alq_id
from ALIQUOTS
where sample_id = HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)
and order_id = 0;
insert into D_DEBUG (ID, DD) values (1, 'alq_id: '||alq_id); -- REMOVE!!!
update ALIQUOTS
set order_id = :P130_SELECT_ORDER
where id = alq_id;
cnt := cnt + 1;
end loop;
dml_service.upd_sample_record(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)); -- refresh data in SAMPLE table
end loop;
:P130_MSG := 'Assigned '||cnt||' aliquots to order: '||:P130_SELECT_ORDER;
end;
Now my problem is that this process does what it should, sometimes. When I enter 6 in one row and check the checkbox and enter 4 in another row and check that checkbox and then press SUBMIT, 10 aliquots are assigned to my order.
Sometimes.... the other times the process just orders 2 aliquots, one of each line and disregards the number entered in the textfield.
Or so it may seem: I added some lines to write debug info into D_DEBUG (see above.) From those entries you can assume that the content of HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i) is in fact '1' when the process does its work. So I think the problem lies somewhere in the creation of htmldb_item.text(), (I went through the API of that htmldb_item again and again...)
Also: I can reproduce / recreate this error. It's totally weird: for some rows it (always) works and for some it (always) doesn't !!!
So, any help, any suggestion is really appreciated (I'm currently working on bringing the crucial part of this to marvel.oracle.com)
-David-
[Edited by: sleuniss on Jul 15, 2004 12:18 PM]
Changed subject line.

Now the subjectline is right, but the indentation is gone.... :-(
again the SQL query:
select     distinct(sq.SAMPLE_ID) XXX,
           'ID: '||sq.SAMPLE_ID||'
' ||'Type: '||sq.SAMPLE_TYPE||'
' ||'Collection Date: '||sq.COLLECTION_DATE SAMPLE_INFO,
           'Aliquots (T/A): '||to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_TOTAL)|| '/' ||to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE)||'
' ||'Volume (T/A): '||to_char(sq.VOLUME_TOTAL,'990D00')|| '/' ||to_char(sq.VOLUME_AVAILABLE,'990D00') AVAILABILITY,
           'Age: '||sq.PATIENT_AGE||'
' ||'Gender: '||sq.PATIENT_SEX||'
' ||'Bloodtype: '||sq.BLOOD_TYPE||'
' PATIENT_INFO,
           DML_SERVICE.get_Diagnoses(sq.SAMPLE_ID) DIAGNOSES,
           DML_SERVICE.get_Medications(sq.SAMPLE_ID) MEDICATIONS,
           DML_SERVICE.get_Interferences(sq.SAMPLE_ID) INTERFERENCES,
           DML_SERVICE.get_LabData(sq.SAMPLE_ID) LABDATA,
           decode(to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE), '0', null, htmldb_item.text(1, '1', 1, 2)) ORDER_QTY,
           decode(to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE), '0', null, htmldb_item.checkbox(2,sq.SAMPLE_ID)) ORDER_ME
from     SEARCH_V01 sq
where sq.DIAGNOSIS = 'D-Dimer'
order    by 1 desc
and the process:
declare
   alq_qty number;
   alq_id number;
   cnt number;
begin
   cnt := 0;
   for i in 1..HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02.count
   loop
      select count(*) -- set alq_qty to number of available alq's
       into alq_qty
       from ALIQUOTS a
       where a.SAMPLE_ID = HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)
       and a.ORDER_ID = 0;
insert into D_DEBUG (ID, DD) values (1, 'wanted: ' || HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i) || ' available: ' || alq_qty); -- REMOVE!!!
      if alq_qty > to_number(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i)) then -- if there are enough alq's
         alq_qty := to_number(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i)); -- set alq_qty to number of ordered alq's
      end if;
      for n in 1..alq_qty
      loop
         select min(ID)
          into alq_id
          from ALIQUOTS
          where sample_id = HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)
          and order_id = 0;
insert into D_DEBUG (ID, DD) values (1, 'alq_id: '||alq_id); -- REMOVE!!!
         update ALIQUOTS
          set order_id = :P130_SELECT_ORDER
          where id = alq_id;
         cnt := cnt + 1;
      end loop;
      dml_service.upd_sample_record(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)); -- refresh data in SAMPLE table
   end loop;
   :P130_MSG := 'Assigned '||cnt||' aliquots to order: '||:P130_SELECT_ORDER;
end;
-David-

TDS certificate wrong values down payment clearing

Hi,
we are using 4.7 version with patch level Sap &APPl( accounts &
Logistics) SAPKH47029. we are using extended witholding tax. with three
tax codes. Tds + Surcharge, Ecess , SHEcess
we made vendor downpayment Rs5000/-. at the time my TDS is
TDS+Surcharge= 550, Ecess=11, SHEcess= 6, Total tax= Rs567/-
we made vendor invoice Rs10000/- at the time TDS is
TDS+Surcharge= 1100, Ecess=22, SHEcess= 11, Total tax= Rs1133/-
We cleared downpayment using F-54 aginst invoice.
at the time it has reversed the Downpayment tds entry Rs567/-
i made remittance challan J1INCHLN amount RS 1133/- it is correct.
While generating TDS certificate it is showing wrong values. Rs 1116/-
it is showing two line items.
Amount paid TDS Surcharge Educat cess Total tax
9450.00 500 50 1 549.00
5000.00 500 50 17 567.00
Total 1116.00
But it is showing correct value in Querterly e returns J1INQEFILE

Hi,
Note Number: 1124300

Viewing wrong values in messageStyledtext box created by personalisation

Hi
I created a messageStyledText thru personalisation and the value is setting to this by calling a procedure.Please find the code below.
String sql="BEGIN XXCHR_ACCRUAL_BALANCE_CALC(:1,:2); END;";
oapagecontext.writeDiagnostics(this, "*** Congragulations you entered the Action" + sql , 1);
//SSHRParams sshrParams = new SSHRParams(oadbt);
OracleCallableStatement stmt = (OracleCallableStatement)oadbt.createCallableStatement(sql,1);
stmt.setString(1,person_id);
stmt.registerOutParameter(2,OracleTypes.NUMBER);
stmt.execute();
oadbt.commit();
String us_pto_accrual_value = null;
us_pto_accrual_value = stmt.getString(2);
Issue now is : First time i login accrual balance will be displayed correctly in the text box.There is Save button in the page.For current pay period i entered a PTO value as 8 hours.Then i clicked on the save button.The accrual is not submitted so after page refreshes the same value which we have seen before shd come.But the value is coming something different.So what i have done is i tried to print this stmt.getString(2) value using diagonistics.First time it is retrieving correctly but after clicking on the save button it is assigned some wrong value.
I closed the current IE and opened a new IE then it is showing correct values.
Can anyone help on this issue.?
It is very urgent.
Thanks
Preeti

Hi Gaurav,
We are just calling the procedure in the backend and we are assigning the result to the out parameter and that out parameter is assigining to a variable using getString method.
Then we are picking the id for that and setting the value like this:
OAMessageStyledTextBean uspto = (OAMessageStyledTextBean)pgbean.findChildRecursive("USPTOSTYLEDTEXT");
uspto.setValue(oapagecontext,us_pto_accrual_value);
Thanks
Preeti

Statvfs returns wrong values

Hi,
I am developing a program the will check for disk space (used,blocks, available ...) and i am using the statvfs.h file.
When tested with small capacity disks (~5G) it works fine (compared to df -k).
When tested with large capacity disks (~400G) it returns wrong values(compared to df -k).
I am using f_bavail and i am casting from fsblkcnt_t to integer/long.
Please help.
Thanx R.

Thanks for your answer.
I have discovered that it (statvfs.h) doe's not work with vxfs, only with ufs.
I am using Veritas Cluster Server.
Any chance of an answer ??
thanks,
R.

Color picker on Illustrator CC 2014 shows wrong values

See the image above . The selected area filled color is e6e6e6 ( 230, 230, 230 ) but the color picker shows the wrong value 4d4d4d. Its happens only on Illustrator , What is this actually is there any problem with the color mode settings ? Please help me

You misunderstand me, so don’t be too quick to judge.
I said that the Color panel was more efficient than the Color Picker. It has sliders so that you can adjust colours precisely as you wish first time, rather than just groping somewhere on a big area of colour in the Picker and then having to make fine numerical adjustments afterwards (plus an OK when you’re done).
The Color panel is particularly useful when you are working in CMYK because it ensures that you get clean mixtures when you want them (which the Picker does not, without fine tweaking afterwards).
And if you want to get shades of the same colour, you simply hold down Shift as you drag one of the sliders.
In conjunction with the Swatches panel, I would go for the Color panel any time, but if you prefer the Picker that’s quite all right by me.

Wrong value in java stored function

Hi All,
i have written a java stored function,
at the end of the code it insert record into the database
among other columns also a number(18,3) column,
when I debug it (out side of server) - works fine.
when I load it to database i get wrong values in column
(like instead of 76.546 i get 77.667) I can't figure out where it comes from.
I use big decimal in java code.
if i Hard code the value in java code it works fine!
am I missing something ?, calculations/ data type different out side then inside database? using oracle 10.2.0.2
Cheers
Sahar

Hi
the code calculate some averages of amounts ( money) according to several
conditions,and parameters given to the function and stores the average into table in the database
the money columns are of data type 18,3 , both source and target tables have same structure.
thanks
Sahar

CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM gives wrong values for Scess and HScess in PO Print

Dear Friends,
I am working with PO Print in smartforms hare the Fm CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM is gives wrong values for Scess and HEcess if I put the Gate pass (Basic Excise Duty) Manually.
And one more Issue is as if I check any line item condition taxes than imediatly when I see the print the all line items Scee and HEcess displays same which I have saw.
If there is a single line item in PO than there is no issue any way.
kindly suggest to resolve the issue.
Regards,
D Tarun Kumar

Hi,
I had the same issue, that taxes on invoice tab of PO was not printed correctly on PO form by calling CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
If you want to have the same tax value as komp-mwsbp, that use following form routine call before FB CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
perform j_1b_save_tax_fields(saplmepo) using ekko ekpo lfa1.
This is used in transaction me23n also.
Kind regards,
Tülay

Wrong value with calculated item in pivot table

I have a report with 4 columns:
First Column are Department Dimension
Second Column is Actual value
Third Column is Previous value
Four Column is: ((Actual Value-Previous Value)/Previous Value))*100 that called Var
Then I do a pivot table and I have new calculated item: Department1/Department2 and I have wrong value in four column:
Department----------------------------------Actual-------Previous------Var
Dept1------------------------------------------18503--------16308--------13,5
Dept2-------------------------------------------3758---------3518----------6,8
(Calculated Item: Dept1/Dept2)--------4,92---------4,64------------*2* <---- This value is wrong...and it has to be: 6,03
Is possible to get the correct value???
Thank you very much!

hi,
Create a logical column with ur calculation formula and make it as default agg rule in rpd and answers change it to server determined/server complex agg.I did the same it was working fine for me!!
Check this link
http://books.google.com/books?id=OnbYrkWa4RsC&pg=PA74&lpg=PA74&dq=%22server+complex+aggregate%22&source=web&ots=qxrpaFXmo2&sig=CxLOemzcOlvIiaQ_sQD4fPQotdM&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result#v=onepage&q=%22server%20complex%20aggregate%22&f=false
thanks,
saichand

RG23C AED WRONG VALUE

Dear Gurus.
I have crearted Import asset Purchase order then we have made finanvial entry and creating good receipt and post Part 1 Entry.
Now I want to Post Part 2 entry using J1iex but when I Simulate I have got wrong value in RG23c AED.
value comes 100 % but i want 50 % and 50 % should goes in RG23C on Hold .
I am Waiting your reply.
Regards,
Riten patel

Dear Piyush Mishra
It is Not ADC , It is AED (additional excise Duty)
Still i am facing problem.
I am waiting your Reply.
Regards,
Riten patel

Inter company Billing is taking a wrong value of the Bill

Inter company Billing is taking a wrong value of the Bill

Hi,
Can you give more information about this.
Paul

NI PCI-6602: semi-period measurement stops unexpectedly or returns wrong values

Hi,
Using an NI PCI-6602 card we try to measure the semi-periods of a digital signal.
In "continuous sampling mode", 10 samples are collected in the buffer and then are read
out.
Up to 6 counters on this card are sampling the same signal in our testing configuration.
Here we found these issues:
1. Failure
In principle, the measurement runs correctly, but one or more counters sporadically may
suffer a complete failure. I.e. these counters don't provide samples anymore.
Only after stopping and restarting the assigned task, a failed counter works again.
Apparently, a counter failure is most likely to happen when
    - the sampled signal "changes", i.e. when the pulse width of the signal changes,
    - or when the computer load is high, e.g. when opening a window of another application.
Every counter occasionally failed, but the issue was found very often at counter 1 of
the PCI-6602 card, if we used counters 0 through 5 in parallel.
Using another PCI-6602 card, the failures happened preferably on counters labeled "near"
number 5.
2. Wrong values
Occasionally the "interpretation" of the sampled values changes, i.e. the length of the
"high level" period is returned, where the "low level" period length should be given, and
vice versa.
This is our task configuration:
Configuration done with MAX:
Signal input range:    2 usec - 2 sec
Custom Scaling:        None
Sample mode:        continuous
Buffer size:        10 Samples
In addition these calls are made:
ret = DAQmxSetDigEdgeArmStartTrigSrc( task->mHandle, <use the same terminal as is used for
the signal to be measured>);
ret = DAQmxSetArmStartTrigType( task->mHandle, DAQmx_Val_DigEdge);
ret = DAQmxSetDigEdgeArmStartTrigEdge( task->mHandle, DAQmx_Val_Rising);
ret = DAQmxSetCISemiPeriodStartingEdge( task->mHandle, <the channel>, DAQmx_Val_Falling);
Best regards
Manfred

Hi Manfred7,
did you already test this behaviour with a simple example from us?
Just go through the example database and try the examples there.
These examples should work.
If it works, there is a problem with your programm.
If it won't work, please tell me more about your software:
- Version
- DAQmx Version ,...
best regards
Dippi

101 GR/IR wrong values

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for