10GE-WAN-PHY to STM-64

Hello,
I would be grateful if anyone can help me with this problem.
Is it possible to interconnect 10GE WAN-PHY port on router to STM-64 port on multiplexer?
Is it generaly allowed to inerconnect SDH and SONET (or their frames and signals are not compatibile) i.e oc-192 and STM-64?
I have DWDM with four STM-16/OTU-1 ports. I've planned to multiplex those 4 ports to one STM-64 and connect it to 10GE WAN-PHY router port.
(router)10GE-WAN-PHY-----STM-64/OTU-2 (multiplexer) 4xSTM-16/OTU-1-----4xSTM16/OTU-1(dwdm).
Is it feasible or I need some additional equipment?
thanks in advance,
A.

1) When I connect 10GE WAN-PHY router port to STM-64 box, will router send STM-64 frames, or it has different frames then SDH?
Is the 10GE WAN-PHY also compatibile with OC-192?
Yes it sends STM-64 frames (but it doesnot have network management features which SONET/SDH STM64 interface have) See this link
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps6267/product_data_sheet0900aecd80715dc5.html
So  one to connect to a DWDM STM 64 /SONET- 192 trasponder which then makes  a proper SDH/SONET frame with all those management bytes.
Same port can be either used for STM 64 or SONET 192. This STM64/SONET192 are still made from smaller SDH/SONET frames
2) Do you know if Cisco has a box that can  interface two boxes  STM64----OC192 (or OC-3 --- STM-1)? Which type of  box is that generaly?
Are you crossing  continent with your own infrastruture , service provider have  crossconnect that do that for them this conversionTellabs,Fujitsu etc  RAD for smaller line rates ? Cisco have boxes which either can be SDH or  SONET but see this link. Might be helpful.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/optical/15000r5_0/planning/guide/r50sdhtr.pdf
3) (router)10GE-WAN-PHY-----STM-64/OTU-2 (SDH/SONET box) 4xSTM-16/OTU-1-----4xSTM16/OTU-1(dwdm).
I   wasn't clear enough in my previous post. I was thinking to put box   (multiplexer) between router and DWDM, which on one side toward router   will have STM-64 and toward DWDM will have four STM-16 ports.
Is the scheme that I corrected now above in point 3) allowed?
You  can have point to point link where STM 64 are demultiplexed to STM 16.  This is the way how 100G are trasnported over 10 x 10G. I dont see any  benefit on a extra box with point to point link.
But If this 10GEWAN is your hub and have spokes which have router with STM 16 interface, then you can make 4 STM 16 pipes. All these you are trying to achieve are possible but you may need extra equipments to get the result.
For one more opinion you can consult with Solution specialist from Cisco. Generally all marketing guys try to sell more than what you need.

Similar Messages

  • LAN Phy or WAN Phy?

    Hi All,
    Can someone please clarify the difference between 10Gbps LAN Phy and WAN Phy?
    Is there is a preference between using either/or?

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:11.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
    Hello,
    We can think of 10GE LAN as a usual Ethernet we used to see.
    10GE WAN uses SONET/SDH  framing instead and hence can be directly connected to OC-192c/STM-64 interfaces at a carrier network. For diagnostics 10GE WAN PHY makes use of the SONET overhead bits to detect :
    - Loss of signal
    - Coding violations
    - Framing errors/ loss of frame
    - Errored seconds
    - Severely errored seconds
    - Loss of synchronization (not needed) •             Same Error/ performance monitoring
    - B1, B2, B3
    - J0, J1
    Same Defect/ Alarms
    - FEBE
    - RDI
    - AIS
    Regards,
    /A

  • 10 Gigabit Ethernet Wan PHY vs LAN PHY

    hello,
    Is it possible to connect a 10 Gigabit Ethernet LAN PHY client interface (12xxx or 76xx) on a 10 Gigabit Ethernet WAN PHY port of provider équipment (Nortel 5200) ?
    what about the existence of 10 Gigabit Ethernet WAN PHY interface on 12xxx or 76xx plateform ?
    thank you in advance

    The Cisco ONS 15454 MSTP DWDM system offers a a 10Gbps transponder card supporting a 10GE LAN PHY client interface.
    http://cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/optical/ps2006/products_data_sheet0900aecd80101903.html
    I do not know if the Nortel 5200 DWDM system supports LAN PHY interfaces on their transponders.

  • CISCO XENPAK-10GB-LW (WAN PHY)

    hi,
    do you know if installing the CISCO XENPAK-10GB-LW (WAN PHY) you need a SONET/SDH multiplexer or you can connect it directly to the SDH network?
    any document explaining it?
    thanks

    The WAN PHY module will appear to your SDH network as a SONET tributary interface. Its signal will need to be carried intact as an OC-192 (approximately 10 Gbps) across the SDH network since it's not a bunch of STS payloads but rather a single 10 Gbps IP stream encapsulated in SONET framing. Other than that, it should be able to feed your SDH network's ADM just fine (given attention to your optical power levels, etc.).
    Hope this helps, please rate helpful posts.

  • CRS with 10GE port

    Hi ,
    As of now we use 1 port 10GE card only (Cisco 1-Port 10-Gigabit Ethernet LAN/WAN-PHY SPA) in our CRS connects to Core backbone.
    We might need 10GE for access now to provide 10GE to PE ( pure ethernet not any optical technology).
    I was trying to find out the line card support more 10GE port density for this purpose. Cisco support 8 port 10GE module but that is not SPA rather normal Ethernet card (Cisco CRS-1 8-Port 10 Gigabit Ethernet Interface Module). How is it diff than SPA to use for PE-P - MPLS link includes LSP, Qos etc feature....
    Can I use this 8 port 10GE card for the above puropse ? Important thing there should not be any major limitation
    Regards,
    Chintan

    Hello Chintan,
    in other platforms we are used to see more features or different features supported on SPA modules.
    the datasheet of the 8 TenGiga
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5763/ps5862/product_data_sheet09186a008022d5e9.html
    About SW it just says:
    Software Compatibility
    Cisco IOS XR Software Release 3.0 or later
    the list of features for SPA GE and 10GE
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps6267/product_data_sheet0900aecd804d884d_ps5763_Products_Data_Sheet.html
    There is some more detail.
    then I've gone to
    www.cisco.com/go/crs
    but I've found no useful info
    Looking at the configuration guides, the QoS for example I didn't find any distinction about the linecards
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/iosxr_r3.7/qos/configuration/guide/qc37fab.html#wp998930
    Ask to your cisco account manager or even open a TAC service request to request info to be sure.
    Hope to help
    Giuseppe

  • WRP400 wan-lan speed

    Hi All!
    I have a problem with my WRP400 WAN-to-LAN speed no more than 48Mbit/s incoming and up to 42-45 MBit/s outgoing.
    My connection is 100/100 Mbit/s, Firmware 2.00.26 , OS Win 7 Ultimate.
    QoS disabled, VoIP not in use.
    Is there any possibility to increase speed?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi, I have the same problem.
    I have WRP400 (firmware 2.00.32 - I try all firmware).
    Now my connection is 100/10 Mbit/s. 
    Directly connecting the modem to the computer I get the maximum speed 100 Mbit/s download and 10 Mbit/s upload.
    By connecting the router I get up to speed 47Mbit/s download and 10 Mbit/s upload.
    www.speedtest.net/my-result/3969122353
    In the router settings (SETUP / ADVANCED SETTINS) when the change parameter "WAN Phy Flow Control" to 100 half, the results are the same. When I change to 100 full I get speed for 10.
    I thing the option 100FULL is not working. Only 100 HALF.

  • Conversion from OC-192 to Ethernet

    Hello ,
    We have backbone links which are WAN-PHY based that is based on SDH/Sonet  directly terminated onto the routers with STM-16/STM-64 cards .These links needs to be converted to Ethernet  for monitoring purpose to a monitoring device or IPS which supports only Ethernet interface
    Does anyone know of any media convertors from fiber to ethernet  that is 10GBASE-W to 10GBASE-SR or 10GBASE-CX4 

    Yeah they will take your coax from your cable modem and use it on the fios router.

  • What is the BB license for ASR1000 act as LNS

    I want to apply ASR1004 act as  LNS to support 20K PPP session, the following configuration can support it(I suppose 20K session's traffic is 20G.):
    Part Number
    Product Description
    Quantity
    ASR1004
    Cisco ASR1004 Chassis, Dual P/S
    1
    ASR1004-PWR-AC
    Cisco ASR1004 AC Power Supply
    2
    Part number depends on required power cable
    Power Cable
    2
    ASR1000-RP2
    Cisco ASR1000 Route Processor 2, 8GB DRAM
    1
    ASR1000-ESP20
    Cisco ASR1000 Embedded Services Processor, 20Gbps
    1
    ASR1000-SIP10
    Cisco ASR1000 SPA Interface Processor 10
    2
    SPA-1X10GE-L-V2
    Cisco 1-Port 10GE LAN-PHY Shared Port Adapter
    2
    XFP-10GLR-OC192SR
    Multirate XFP module for 10GBASE-LR and OC192 SR-1
    2
    SASR1R2-AISK9
    Cisco ASR1000 Series RP2 Advanced IP SERVICES
    1
    FLASR1-BB-RTU
    Broadband Right-To-Use with 500 BB Sessions Lic for ASR1000
    1
    FLASR1-BB-4K
    Broadband 4K Sessions Feature License for ASR1000 Series
    1
    FLASR1-BB-16K
    Broadband 4K Sessions Feature License for ASR1000 Series
    1
    "Part number ASR1006-10G-B16/K9: Supports 16,000 sessions" that should inclde 16K sessions and SASR1R2-AISK9. It also include the FLASR1-BB-RTU?
    Please help me, I am waiting it online.  I am a small ISP,  no cisco sales or tech support.
    thank you very much.  

    Hi Giles,
    Thanks for your response but Apple is not stating the payment method for Online Apple Store for Malaysia. I called up Apple Store Malaysia to ask about this and they mentioned that only credit card is available.
    I wondering how a company have a credit to provide the payment? Is there other alternative?

  • ASR1K License for BB

    I want to apply ASR1004 act as  LNS to support 20K PPP session, the following configuration can support it(I suppose 20K session's traffic is 20G.):
    Part Number
    Product Description
    Quantity
    ASR1004
    Cisco ASR1004 Chassis, Dual P/S
    1
    ASR1004-PWR-AC
    Cisco ASR1004 AC Power Supply
    2
    Part number depends on required power cable
    Power Cable
    2
    ASR1000-RP2
    Cisco ASR1000 Route Processor 2, 8GB DRAM
    1
    ASR1000-ESP20
    Cisco ASR1000 Embedded Services Processor, 20Gbps
    1
    ASR1000-SIP10
    Cisco ASR1000 SPA Interface Processor 10
    2
    SPA-1X10GE-L-V2
    Cisco 1-Port 10GE LAN-PHY Shared Port Adapter
    2
    XFP-10GLR-OC192SR
    Multirate XFP module for 10GBASE-LR and OC192 SR-1
    2
    SASR1R2-AISK9
    Cisco ASR1000 Series RP2 Advanced IP SERVICES
    1
    FLASR1-BB-RTU
    Broadband Right-To-Use with 500 BB Sessions Lic for ASR1000
    1
    FLASR1-BB-4K
    Broadband 4K Sessions Feature License for ASR1000 Series
    1
    FLASR1-BB-16K
    Broadband 4K Sessions Feature License for ASR1000 Series
    1
    "Part number ASR1006-10G-B16/K9: Supports 16,000 sessions" that should inclde 16K sessions and SASR1R2-AISK9. It also include the FLASR1-BB-RTU?
    Please help me, I am waiting it online.  I am a small ISP,  no cisco sales or tech support.
    thank you very much.  

    Refer the steps mentioned in the follwoing document
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/error-licensing-stopped-mac-os.html
    Thanks
    Harshit yadav

  • MPLS PE/P 7600 or ASR 1000

    hi,
    We are planning to change our 7206VXR as P/PE routers.  Currently we only have 2 nodes that is running on STM-1.  on each node we have 7206VXR NPEG2 that is acting as PE and P router.
    our requirement is getting bigger we will be upgrading our WAN links to STM-4 soon (and to STM-12 in the future) and we will also be adding more nodes.
    I'm confused on what platform would be best for our network, 7600 or  ASR1000......7600???? 7606 or 7604?      ASR 1000???? ASR1004 or ASR 1006.
    I want my router to accomodate the growth in the network.
    I need your advise/expertise on this.
    Thanks in advance....
    Rachelle

    Hi,
    ASR1k runs IOS-XE, which is IOS. It does not run IOS-XR. ASR9k runs IOS-XR.
    The newer platforms, like ASR1k, ASR9k, have more throughput, while 7200 e.g. has a bigger
    range in different kinds of port adaptors. If you only plan to use ethernet interfaces for example, then
    you could only look at the newer platforms like ASR1k, ASR9k, or even 7600 and choose
    a specific model based on the number of ports you'd need.
    Thanks,
    Luc

  • 6509 to ons 15454 showing not connect.

    Were running into a problem moving from an oc48 to oc192. In our web enviornment we have a Front-end switch and a Back-end switch in two data centers that are 10 miles apart. Were running a "gigaman" betweent the two. On both ends we have cs6509's and were patched into the Gbic interface on the sup2's. This fiber is ran to are lec's ons 15454 which I have no visibility into. We are unable to get a connection on the 6509's. Were doing basic layer 2 trunking between the switches. Sbc tested from the fiber on the switch to a loop on the other switch and was able to test clean. This worked on the oc-48 but are switches were not connected to a cisco ons. Any suggestions would be apperciated. You can also email me at [email protected] or AIM jjt8572.

    Have you checked that you have matched the physical media framing - e.g., LAN PHY needs to speak to LAN PHY (or WAN PHY to WAN PHY). Typically the ONS 15454 would be looking for a SONET frames (WAN PHY) while a Cisco 6509 would be sending 10 Gigabit Ethernet LAN frames (LAN PHY). That is, unless you specifically choose an interface for your 6509 such as the XENPAK-10GB-LW (10GBASE-LW XENPAK Module with WAN PHY for SMF). From that product's data sheet: "The Cisco 10GBASE-LW Module supports a link length of 10 kilometers on standard single-mode fiber (SMF) (G.652).
    WAN-PHY is intended to allow the transport of 10 Gigabit Ethernet over a traditional SONET/SDH infrastructure. The purpose of WAN-PHY is to render 10 Gigabit Ethernet compatible with SONET STS-192c format and data rate, as defined by ANSI, as well as the SDH VC-4-64c container specified by ITU."
    One can also use Cisco ONS transponder cards that will wrap LAN PHY framing in something like G.709 encapsulation to allow it to be transported through a DWDM network.

  • SFP-10G-LR-S vs SFP-10G-LR

    Ciao,
    is there anyone that can explain what is (are) the difference(s) between the two optics in the title ?
    In particular what are the "unnecessary features" of the SFP-10G-LR-S ? Can they be used in UA to Core deployment ?
    (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/transceiver-modules/bulletin-c25-733742.html)
    BR,
    Luciano

    The table below shows the key feature differences for the 10 Gbps S-class vs. C-class.
    For UA to core campus applications, S-class are quite suitable.
    C-Class
    S-Class
    Multi-rate vs Single-rate
    Multi-rate optics:
    Ethernet
    OTN
    WAN-PHY
    Single-rate optics:
    Ethernet only
    Operating temperature range
    Commercial (0C to 70C)
    Extended (-5C to 85C)
    Industrial (-40C to 85C)
    Commercial (0C to 70C) only

  • SCE8000 and required servers

    Dear All,
    we want to implement two SCE8000 as DPI, in two deferent location.
    my question is : do we need any addtional servers beside to the SCE8000 , if we need, what is the server specification, please let us know?
    below is the configuration for ( 2) cisco SCE8000 :
    Line #
    PartNo
    Item Description
    QTY
    SCE8000-4X10G-E
    Cisco SCE8000, Fan, SCM-E, SIP, 4 10GE SPAs
    2
    SCE8000-NON-MGSCP
    Single or 1+1 Cascade SCE8000 configuration
    2
    PWR-2700-AC/4
    2700W AC Power Supply for Cisco 7604/6504-E
    4
    CAB-C19-CBN
    Cabinet Jumper Power Cord, 250 VAC 16A, C20-C19 Connectors
    4
    XFP-10GLR-OC192SR
    Multirate XFP module for 10GBASE-LR and OC192 SR-1
    8
    OPB-SCE8K-SM
    Cisco SCE8000 Optical Bypass, Singlemode
    4
    OPB-SCE8K-INT-PNL
    Cisco SCE8000 Internal Optical Bypass Panel
    2
    C-INSIGHT-8000
    C-Insight License For 1xSCE8000
    2
    Included: SCE8000-FAN
    Cisco SCE8000 Fan Tray
    2
    Included: SCE8000-SCM-E
    Cisco SCE8000 Service Control Module - Extended
    2
    Included: SCE8000-SIP
    Cisco SCE8000 SPA Interface Processor
    2
    Included: SCE8K-SLOT-CVR
    Cisco SCE8000 Blank Slot Cover
    2
    Included: SPA-1X10GE-L-V2
    Cisco 1-Port 10GE   LAN-PHY Shared Port Adapter
    8
    Included: SCA-BB-VO-R3
    SCA View Only - V3.x
    2
    Included: SCE8000-SCOS-R3-K9
    Cisco SCE8000 K9 SCOS Software Release 3.x
    2
    Included: SCMS-CM
    Service Control Collection Mgr (database s/w not included)
    2
    Operator-wide tier-control licenses - one license for 50K   subs included
    SCA-BB-TCL
    Cisco SCA for BB Tier Cntl
    1
    SCA-BB-TC-50K-R3
    SCA Tiered Control - V3.x, 50K subs
    1
    SCMS-SM
    Cisco Service Control Subscriber Manager
    1
    please help us, we need your fast response.
    Thanks in Advance
    Rashed.

    Hi Rashed,
    I see that your list includes Cisco Insight Reporter and Cisco Service Control Subscriber Manager. Those are SW pieces which will require some servers to run them. You can review the following documents to have an idea of the SW and HW requirements for the servers required to run those components:
    - Insight:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/cable/serv_exch/serv_control/broadband_app/insight/rel34/install_guide/insight_34_ig.pdf
    - Subscriber Manager:
    www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/cable/serv_exch/serv_control/broadband_app/rel38x/smug/Installation_and_Upgrading.html
    If you have any doubt, I would strongly suggest you to reach out to your local Cisco Acount Team for these type of questions. They will be able to provide you proper support and guidance for these type of inquires.
    Best regards.

  • Regarding STM channel

    Hi,
    At End A we have an STM-1 connectivity, wherein we have created E1 channel. and other end has been connected with 2Mb modem.
    All Links connecting to the same STM is working fine, expect one channel.It is showing as
    Serial0/3/0.1/1/6/3:0 is down, line protocol is down
    both the ends are framed and configuration is correct.
    If this is a physical port we would have verified Physical issues, as it's a logical port, how it can be sorted out. ISP is claiming you have to check from your end. please guide.
    Thanks in advance.
    Naveen

    not sure, the configuration and topoly is required in this case,
    amybe WAN people are best to answer,
    but you need to check KLM, it should have to be same between interconnecting nodes.

  • RV320 - using one WAN port

    What is the correct configuration for using one WAN port so that the router doesn't crash several times a day?
    Should WAN2 be left as address from IP ?
    Shoudl WAN2 be configured as static IP ?
    Should WAN2 interface be disabled?
    Should WAN2 be configured as DMZ and left as default 192.168.1.0?
    Should WAN2 be configured as DMZ and then disabled?
    It's definitely the router which is at fault, power cycling the fibre to copper converter dosen't fix the issue.
    Nor does swapping the FTC for a brand new one.
    Only a power cycle on the RV320, or a remote web interface reset if I'm unside the LAN, makes it work.
    Temporarily, then it crashes next day.

    I have the same settings, and the same up-to-date firmware.
    I see in the logs that the router incorrectly reports WAN2 as Up, then can't sync rate with it.
    Most of the time that failure is around the same time as the users report failure.
    But nothing is logged for WAN1 so it doesn't seem to be a physical failure in cabling, or the FTC converter feeding the router.
    2015-04-27, 10:33:35
    Kernel
    kernel: WAN [2] UP
    2015-04-27, 10:33:35
    Kernel
    kernel: [eth0] lanip=192.168.1.1, mask=255.255.255.0
    2015-04-27, 10:33:35
    Kernel
    kernel: ip[xxx.xxx.xx.xxx] mask[0.0.0.0]
    2015-04-27, 10:33:35
    Kernel
    kernel: ip[0.0.0.0] mask[0.0.0.0]
    2015-04-27, 10:33:36
    Kernel
    kernel: WAN [2] DOWN
    2015-04-27, 10:42:10
    Kernel
    kernel: WARNING: cant get external phy status
    2015-04-27, 10:42:11
    Kernel
    kernel: WARNING: no highest common denominator or auto-negotiation not complete
    2015-04-27, 10:42:11
    Kernel
    kernel: WARNING: no highest common denominator or auto-negotiation not complete
    2015-04-27, 10:58:01
    Kernel
    kernel: WARNING: no highest common denominator or auto-negotiation not complete
    2015-04-27, 10:58:02
    Kernel
    last message repeated 2 times
    2015-04-27, 10:58:02
    Kernel
    kernel: nk_bcm53115_sync_speeds_phy_to_mac(): sport[5], speed[0], duplex[0]
    2015-04-27, 10:58:03
    Kernel
    kernel: nk_bcm53115_sync_speeds_phy_to_mac(): sport[5], speed[1], duplex[2]

Maybe you are looking for