11.1.2.1 Release Delayed Again?

At the end of March, I was hearing April 10. Today I read this:
http://blog.topdownconsulting.com/2011/04/oracle-hyperion-11-1-2-1%E2%80%94now-it-looks-like-summer/
Anbody have good information on whether April 10 is real or not?

<div style="width:660px; font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; line-height: 20px; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
We have selected the most popular papers published by IJCNS in the year 2010 for you. You are welcome to forward this message to your colleagues and friends in the related areas.
International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences (IJCNS)
is an international refereed journal dedicated to the latest advancement of communications and network technologies. The goal of this journal is to keep a record of the state-of-the-art research and promote the research work in these fast moving areas.
 IJCNS is published by Scientific Research Publishing which is engaged in the service of publications, organizing academic conferences and promotion of professional journals. SCIRP has an outstanding team of experts as well as the widespread third party relations, which enables our customers to obtain maximum reader impact, and the satisfaction and convenience of timely publications.
<div>
Vol.3 No.1 (Click to view the issue)
Extending the Network Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Residual Energy Extraction—Hybrid Scheduling Algorithm
T. V. PADMAVATHY, M. CHITRA
A Maximum Likelihood TOA Based Estimator For Localization in Heterogeneous Networks
Mohamed LAARAIEDH, Stephane AVRILLON, Bernard UGUEN
Achievable Rate Regions for Orthogonally Multiplexed MIMO Broadcast Channels with Multi-Dimensional Modulation
Marthe KASSOUF, Harry LEIB
</div>
<div>
Vol.3 No.2 (Click to view the issue)
Online Detection of Network Traffic Anomalies Using Degree Distributions
Wuzuo WANG, Weidong WU
CPW Fed Double T-Shaped Array Antenna with Suppressed Mutual Coupling
A. DANIDEH, A. A. Lotfi NEYESTANAK
A Topology-Aware Relay Lookup Scheme for P2P VoIP System
Xiuwu ZHANG, Ruifeng GUO, Weimin LEI, Wei ZHANG
</div>
<div>
Vol.3 No.3 (Click to view the issue)
Advances in MIMO Techniques for Mobile Communications-A Survey
Farhan Khalid, Joachim Speidel
Short-Term Load Forecasting Using Soft Computing Techniques
D. K. Chaturvedi, Sinha Anand Premdayal, Ashish Chandiok
A Mobile Ad-Hoc Routing Algorithm with Comparative Study of Earlier Proposed Algorithms
Kumar Verma Pawan, Gupta Tarun, Rakesh Nitin, Nitin Nitin
</div>
<div>
Vol.3 No.4 (Click to view the issue)
Envelope Correlation Parameter Measurements in a MIMO Antenna Array Configuration
Constantinos Votis, George Tatsis, Panos Kostarakis
MIMO Multi Carrier Interleave Division Multiple Access System with Multiuser Detection: Performance Results
Prabagarane Nagaradjane, Sai N. Chandrasekaran, Kuttathatti Srinivasan Vishvaksenan
Comparative Study of Different Space-Time Coding Schemes for MC-CDMA Systems
Lokesh Kumar Bansal, Aditya Trivedi
</div>
<div>
Vol.3 No.5 (Click to view the issue)
Measurements of Balun and Gap Effects in a Dipole Antenna
Constantinos Votis, Vasilis Christofilakis, Panos Kostarakis
Microstrip Low-Pass Elliptic Filter Design Based on Implicit Space Mapping Optimization
Saeed Tavakoli, Mahdieh Zeinadini, Shahram Mohanna
Interoperability of Wireless Networks with 4G Based on Layer Modification
Dilshad Mahjabeen, Aminul Haque Mohammed Sayem, Anis Ahmed, Shahida Rafique
</div>
<div>
Vol.3 No.6 (Click to view the issue)
A Multi-objective QoS Optimization with Fuzzy Based Parameter Setting for Real-Time Multicasting
Satyananda Champati Rai, Bijan Bihari Misra, Ajit Kumar Nayak, Rajib Mall, Sateesh Kumar Pradhan
Flocking Control of a Group of Agents Using a Fuzzy-Logic-Based Attractive/Repulsive Function
Hui Yu, Jigui Jian, Yanjun Shen
An Empirical Examination of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Kuncha Sahadevaiah, Oruganti Bala Venkata Ramanaiah
</div>
<div>
Vol.3 No.7 (Click to view the issue)
Using Bayesian Game Model for Intrusion Detection in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks
Hua Wei, Hao Sun
Design of Rectangular Dielectric Resonator Antenna Fed by Dielectric Image Line with a Finite Ground Plane
Fatemeh Kazemi, Mohammad Hassan Neshati, Farahnaz Mohanna
Modeling and Analysis of Bandwidth Allocation in IEEE 802.16 MAC: A Stochastic Reward Net Approach
Shanmugam Geetha, Raman Jayaparvathy
</div>
<div>
Vol.3 No.8 (Click to view the issue)
A Sensor Awakening Algorithm for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks Three Dimensional Target Tracking
Jing Zhao, Jianchao Zeng
Reliable Wireless Communication for Medical Devices Using Turbo Convolution Code
Debasish Bera, Tapas Chakravarty, Saswat Chakrabarti
Potential Vulnerability of Encrypted Messages: Decomposability of Discrete Logarithm Problems
Boris S. Verkhovsky
</div>
<div>
Vol.3 No.9 (Click to view the issue)
An Efficient Noisy-ICA Based Approach to Multiuser Detection in IDMA Systems
Abdelkrim Hamza, Salim Chitroub, Gérard Salut
Modulation Index Estimation of Frequency and Phase Modulated Signals
Geng Peng, Derong Cai, Zhiqiang He, Zhitao Huang
A New Effective and Efficient Measure of PAPR in OFDM
Ibrahim M. Hussain, Imran A. Tasadduq, Abdul Rahim Ahmad
</div>
<div>
Vol.3 No.10 (Click to view the issue)
Performance Improvement of Wireless Communications Using Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum
Yang Liu
A Comparative Analysis of Tools for Verification of Security Protocols
Nitish Dalal, Jenny Shah, Khushboo Hisaria, Devesh Jinwala
A Turbo Decoder Included in a Multi-User Detector: A Solution to be Retained
Sylvie Kerouédan, Makram Touzri, Patrick Adde, Samir Saoudi
</div>
<div>
Vol.3 No.11 (Click to view the issue)
Service Networks Topological Design
Boris S. Verkhovsky
A Routing Strategy with Link Disruption Tolerance for Multilayered Satellite Networks
Gang Zheng, Yanxin Guo
Extraction of Buried Signals in Noise: Correlated Processes
Nourédine Yahya Bey
</div>
<div>
Vol.3 No.12 (Click to view the issue)
Enhanced Euclid Algorithm for Modular Multiplicative Inverse and Its Application in Cryptographic Protocols
Boris S. Verkhovsky
Extraction of Signals Buried in Noise: Non-Ergodic Processes
Nourédine Yahya Bey
A Synchronous and Deterministic MAC Protocol for Wireless Communications on Linear Topologies
Daniele De Caneva, Pier Luca Montessoro
</div>
The journal publishes the highest quality, original papers included but not limited to the fields:
<tr>
 <td style="vertical-align:top">
 <ul style="list-style:disc;margin-left:18px; margin-top:2px; padding:0;">
 <li>Ad Hoc and Mesh Networks</li>
 <li>Coding, Detection and Modulation</li>
 <li>Cognitive Radio</li>
 <li>Communication Networks Architecture Design</li>
 <li>Cooperative Communications</li>
 <li>Embedded Distributed Systems</li>
 <li>Global Networks</li>
 <li>Heterogeneous Networking</li>
 <li>MIMO and OFDM Technologies</li>
 <li>Network Protocol, QoS and Congestion Control</li>
 <li>Network Reliability, Security and Privacy</li>
 <li>Network Survivability</li>
 <li>Next Generation Network Architectures</li>
 <li>Reconfigurable Networks</li>
 <li>Resource Management</li>
 <li>Satellite Communication</li>
 <li>Sensor Networks</li>
 <li>Simulation and Optimization Tools</li>
 <li>UWB Technologies</li>
 <li>Wave Propagation and Antenna Design</li>
 <li>Wireless Personal Communications</li>
 </ul>
 </td>
</tr>
We are also interested in short papers (letters) that clearly address a specific problem, and short survey or position papers that sketch the results or problems on a specific topic. Authors of selected short papers would be invited to write a regular paper on the same topic for future issues of the IJCNS.
You are welcome to submit your manuscripts!
</div>
Edited by: 850791 on 2011-4-11 下午8:56

Similar Messages

If PO changes must go to release strategy again

Dear Expert,
Present release strategy is changable.After final release , PO can be change. My client want if changes took place in PO , it should go into release strategy again. please help

Hi,
Please go to SPRO -> MM -> Purchasing -> Purchase Order -> Release Procedure for Purchase Orders -> Define Release Procedure for Purchase Orders -> Release Indicator
Here you have to maintain Chgable as 6 i.e Changeable, new release in case of new strategy and % Value change as 0.
Please note even if you maintain as above, in case if you are lowering value of PO the changes won't go for release. It will work only when the changes are on positive side. Else you need to use User Exit for same.
Hope it helps.
Thnx.

Already released pr, again comng for pr release in sap inbox

dear friends,
our client is having work flw for PR release.
my user already release PR. but in his sap inbox, again same PR is displaying( in the list of PR's to be release).already released one , again coming in the list of new PR list to be released today.why old, already release PR, again coming for PR release.
kindly advice me in this regard.
your advice are considered valuable.
regards,
flemmings

For PR release we need to export and import from both side.
I want to say that if PR is release from your user id then it has exported from that client.
But if it is not get updated in target place then import has to be done in target place to see changes.
you can check code in both places and find out wether updated code is there or not.
If not then ask the basis person to check and import code in target client.
Rewards if helpful.....................
Minal

MM:Release Strategy for Release Order again Approved Contract

Hi,
Release strategy for Release Order is required or not against approved contrat??
As fas as I know once the contract is approved, release order is not required to approve again.
This is the standard setting from SAP or We need to do some setting for this??
In my support project I have studied the release procedure and found that, same release strategy and release Group has been used for Purchase Order and Contract.
Please let me know if anyone have faced this rquirement or I have to go for Z development for this requirement.
Thanks you.

Hi Lalita,
Thank you for your quick suggestion.
yes definitely the release stratergy and release group should be set up separately but here both are same
that is the reason this is picking of the same release procedure again evenif the contract is approved.
we have following release characterstic for the release procedure.
1) Purchasing Group
2)Total Net Order Value
3)Order Type
4)Purchase Organisation
5)Material Group.
I think for the above characterstic we must a separater value for PO and Contract but Currently all are merge
in this only
But Can you tell me "Release Order should be subjected to release procedure" this is correct or not .
If yes then what is the base for this, I mean is it working on the concept that " If do relevent
release characterstic value is found then no release procedure and this is treated as autorelease in sap"
Thanks you.

CS5 Classroom in a Book Delayed AGAIN

Amazon just sent me a notice that Premiere Pro CS5 Classroom in a Book is delayed again
The new "possible" date is somewhere between Sept 8th to the 14th
I will HOPE this means that the author(s) are working with Adobe to document the latest program features

You know, Curt needs to give up any hope a "real life," and get busy!!! He has buyers clamoring.
Hunt
PS - it's probably all completely written, and Adobe Press is the holdup here. At least that's my guess.

Alerady released PR, again coming for release in sap inbox(work flow)

dear friends,
our client is having work flw for PR release.
my user already release PR. but in his sap inbox, again same PR is displaying( in the list of PR's to be release).already released one , again coming in the list of new PR list to be released today.why old, already release PR, again coming for PR release.
kindly advice me in this regard.
your advice are considered valuable.
thanks in advance.
regards,
FLEMMINGS

HI FLEMMINGS,
U HAVE TO CHECK IF UR USER HAVE MADE ANY CHANGES AFTER THE PR ALREADY RELEASED.
REGARDS,
INDRANIL

When will apple release BBM again?, When will apple release BBM again?

I just want to know when will apple release BBM again?

Its not up to Apple, its up to RIM. The makers of Black Berry and Blackberry Messenger.
It was pulled because there was a securtiy breach.
Its up to RIM to put it back. Apple has nothing to do with it.

How to get rid of the trackpad drag release delay?

I've had the MacBook Pro now for about a month. First Mac ever, been a PC user for a very long time. I'm converted, I really like the system and Mac OS but still trying to work out some minor usability issues.
The one that really kills me is the delay when I'm trying to drag something with the trackpad, I lift my finger, and I have to wait a second for it to actually release whatever I'm dragging. I can see how this may be useful in some cases, but personally it's annoying. I want it to release instantly and I can't seem to find a setting for this in the preferences. Am I missing something there? If I wanted this type of behavior I would turn on the "Drag lock" option. Anyone know if it's possible to get rid of this delay?
I've had answers saying that it's the sensitivity of the track pad, but I'm pretty sure it's software related as I have Ubuntu installed on another partition and it doesn't behave that way, things drop instantly after releasing my finger.
It would be nice to have the option to turn off/on the delay in future updates.
Thanks
Message was edited by: rc.square24

Actually, that's only partially correct. We aren't talking about drag-and-drop, we are talking about dragging windows around, dragging sliders, etc. That feature is enabled if you have 'Dragging' checked.
The setting you are referring to where you tap to release is 'Drag-Lock'. In that case, the dragging 'sticks' or is 'locked' until you tap again. What we are talking about is if you have dragging turned on, but drag-lock turned off. In that case, it's still locking, but only for about a second or so (or shorter if you tap again to release, just like when drag-lock is turned on.) What we want however is the very moment we lift our finger, we want the dragging to release instantly, no delay or tap needed.
I can't help but think there is some setting in some plist file somewhere, but I haven't been able to find it as of yet. Still looking, but nada so far.
That's what we're trying to find.
Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

Symbian Belle update delayed again?

Man Nokia have really become pathetic. Before anyone starts bashing me, like I said in my previous post I am a loyal Nokia customer, I have had all kinds of different Symbian phones and have a N8 here in the US where Symbian is dead and almost nobody knows of Symbian. Not only have Nokia fallen from the throne as mobile kings but their employees here are anything but helpful, if you get disappointed that Belle is delayed you are told to leave and join an Apple forum or you are told that Belle will be released in Q4 2011 and then it gets delayed to Q1 2012.
1. First of all Belle brings features that other OS have had for over a year now so it's not bringing anything new at all cause if it was then the delay would be justified.
2. We are closely going into 2012 and Nokia still producing phones like X2-05 or with s40 to compete with dual core phones. Nokia has yet to produce one 4G phone while others have done that in the beginning of 2011. Up until September Nokia didn't even have a 1GHz phone available while others have tons of dual core phones in the market.
3. When polls/statistics are conducted showing which operating system people use more, Symbian doesn't even appear in the US region (probably under "Others") and it is no longer number one in Europe or Asia. Even in Finland Nokia has lost 50% of it's market meaning that only 30 something % of people use a Nokia phone, how embarassing.
4. For anyone who is going to say that you only pay for the phone and it's current OS, not for updates, well I suggest that they wake up and realize that we live in 2011 and not 2004 anymore. Software updates are mandatory to all electronic devices, please name one TV, cellphone, game console etc that does not offer software updates at all and only has the original software to offer. NONE! Softwares always get updated because of new features that come out and to fix bugs, Nokia is way behind with features and it has thousands of bugs/glitches so yeah, updates are mandatory!
5. It is really a shame that Nokia has left the Symbian OS totally behind. All the Nokia blogs and pages talk about WP7, the Nokia World Conference this October hardly even mentioned Symbian. Symbian has brought Nokia where it is and look at how it's being handled. Pathetic.
6. Nokia N9? Genius and the most stupid thing ever done by Nokia. The phone is excellent, unique and it can outsell all the Androids and iPhones out there and yet it is given an OS which Nokia itself will not develop. How to you expect something so great and awesome to sell when it's the only current generation phone out there with Meego and you declare that you will not make any other Meegos or develop the one you have? Stupid stupid stupid.
7. Anna was announced back in March/April and still hasn't been received by all regions, Belle was announced in late August and no time soon will it get released.
I dont know what's happened to this great company. Using out of date services and softwares, delaying updates with features already in the market and most importantly zero customer service. Like I said, wake up Nokia cause times have change, you can no longer be in the market thinking that people use phones like N95. I had never considered having any other phone besides a Symbian phone but delaying Belle was the last straw. I defend Nokia here in the US where they decided to pull out 6 months ago but I have basically run out of facts and arguments to defend Nokia. I will forever be a Nokia fan and even though I am looking for another phone, the only two options are Nokia Lumia 800 or 710 becuase like I said above I am a loyal customer.

1. Many OS's have after all copied Nokia to start with, and considering Belle for symbian ^3 has not been officially released as yet, it hard to say exactly what will be included. Even those who have used the unofficial versions have said that it has changed 3 times now.
2.Nokia produce many more phone than any other manufacturer, which means if someone wants something that works like a phone they can buy it, if they want something that is more like a PC they can buy it also. Most other companies have a few phones and if they don't suit you then tough luck.
3.Much of the press have stated that symbian has been around since the beginning, and can't look beyond their own noses, to see how flexible symbian can be. After all this time Iphones with there so called revolutionary OS has only now received OTA updates.
4.Yes updates are good things, and yes they are offered as you said to fix bugs and to apply no features, however you still don't buy a phone in the beginning due to some feature that may or may not appear in a future update. You still buy the phone for what it currently does.Nobody knows the future!!! and for you to suggest otherwise is just purely ridiculous. Software updates are not mandatory, they, as YOU said, are OFFERED by the relevant company, you don't have to install the update and nor do companies HAVE to give you an update, they do give them because it makes economical sense for them to do so, having said that there will come a time when updates will NOT be offered for the particular phone or whatever.
5.Agreed I would like to see them develop it further.
6.The N9 does look a very nice phone, Not having used Meego however it is hard for me to say one way or the other. But I do think its silly to produce one phone with an OS and then just dump it, before its had a chance.
7.As far as Anna not being received by all regions, mostly this is purely a carrier issue.The carriers have said NO or just have not completed testing etc. I know Telstra Australia received Anna back in June/July and didn't agree to it until December, however other Australian network operators agreed much sooner. These kinds of issues with carriers cannot be controlled by Nokia. It certainly wouldn't surprise me after everyone on here complained about it not being released worldwide in one go, if nokia got all the approvals first then did a single release. I'm not saying this is what they are doing of course only that if they did it wouldn't surprise me.
Personally I have no issue with customer service at least not here in Australia with Nokia. Frankly judging by some peoples attitude on this forum, and I'm not pointing at anyone in particular, I have to wonder why they are here. I do belong to some other forums and honestly I have never seen people whinge and complain like they do on here, which I think is a real shame. These people don't seem to realize that this is a user forum, that happenes to be hosted on the nokia servers, designed to allow users to help other users. I feel quite sure if people made reasonable suggestions for products and services, instead of opening the same type of threads over and over again, then we would have more Nokia involvement in the forum and we could even have the opportunity to influence the powers to be, to include some of the things that we think are worthwhile. But hey its easier to whinge and complain than to use their brains to come up with something constructive.

Nokia N8 delayed again

A statement that is claimed to be coming from nokia
"The amount of preorders has exceeded our expectations and we are working hard to deliver the Nokia N8 to the market. In some markets, we had planned to start delivering the Nokia N8s to our pre-order customers by the end of September. To ensure a great user experience, we have decided to hold the shipments for a few weeks to do some final amends. We're thrilled with the response that we've had to the Nokia N8 and assure everyone who've pre-ordered it already that it'll be worth the wait! We expect consumers to get their Nokia N8s during October."
Edited by Nokia: please do not claim anything to be originating from Nokia unless backed up by a link to an official Nokia source.
If i have helped at all a click on the white star below would be nice thanks.
Now using the Lumia 1520
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Nokia has confirmed:
http://nexus404.com/Blog/2010/09/20/nokia-n8-release-date-pushed-back-to-october-nokia-confirms-earl...
But remember the old Nintendo adage - a late video game is late once. A bad video game is bad forever. It's probably good to finish the product first that there won't be another N97-case.
Read: Nokia N8 Release Date Pushed Back To October [Nokia Confirms Earlier Rumors, N8 Being Delayed Until ...
E7, N8, Lumia 800, Lumia 900

NEVER USE PRE-RELEASE VERSION AGAIN!

As Adobe preferred service provider, I was invited to the pre-release version of CS4, but what they did not tell you is that, when the actual launch came, the pre-release version expired and you no longer able to open them, you have been using it for 3 months, it tells you that you need to upgrade to CS4 and after installing the released CS4, the big surprise is that all of your work for 3 months was a total waste because you can not open them in CS4! Phone support system is a joke, I have been transfered to several agents and every time they did I have to provide, user, email, serial#,case# and then finally got disconnected. Never again!!

As Adobe preferred service provider, I was invited to the pre-release version of CS4, but what they did not tell you is that, when the actual launch came, the pre-release version expired and you no longer able to open them, you have been using it for 3 months, it tells you that you need to upgrade to CS4 and after installing the released CS4, the big surprise is that all of your work for 3 months was a total waste because you can not open them in CS4! Phone support system is a joke, I have been transfered to several agents and every time they did I have to provide, user, email, serial#,case# and then finally got disconnected. Never again!!

Anybody gonna cancel order for 17"MBP C2D if shipping gets delayed again?

Just wondering if anybody else will want to cancel their order if our "updated" shipping date estimate is pushed back again. This is my first Apple (not including my ipod) and it has been a bad experience so far. I was looking forward to my new mac world but right now my trusty PC is looking better and better. If the delay was for something other than supply issues I might not want to get on this sinking ship.

I feel your pain...I ordered the new MBP C2D then cancelled the order, because I wanted to wait for some more feedback. I had ordered a custom configuration and when I called Apple to hold the shipment until I was got back to them they said that normally they won't do that and with it being a custom config it was not returnable. If i cancelled before shipment I would be able to in essence get a refund but in that case I wasn't even being billed for it since they don't charge the credit card until it is shipped. this all happened last night (sunday). I was made aware that if it were shipped anyway because it had already been built I could still return it for a refund since I had made the decision and it is on file with Apple before fedex got their hands on it.
fast forward to this morning.....Fedex got it before Apple pulled it from the loading dock......in the end, I don't really mind the situation. I will just drop it back at fedex. apple didn't pressure me into keeping it and even helped me expedite the return. I also don't need a replacement computer, so I am not in a bind.
Also, I guess, it i needed a new 'puter I would be ****** off with the delay....on the other hand, I would anticipate any delays or problems if I needed a new one.
good luck and hang in there....you won't be disappointed (i hope)
Eric

White iPhone 4 delayed again

Apple has made another statement that the white iPhone 4 is further delayed and not available until later this year now. Check out the apple website and other sites and search it on google. Statement was made today. Man what a dissapointment. Bestbuy needs to allow refunds for white preorders or allow people to get the black one when it's in stock.

Hey guys BB will allow you to switch from the white pre-order list to the black one if they still have a list. Unfortunately the best buy where I preordered my white 32g, has fulfilled it's pre-orders so they are just getting them in and selling them to the public. The nice guy at the store said he would get an email out to everyone that the next one that comes in is mine, luckily I was on a waiting list at a diff vendor for the white one and they let me switch to the black 32 g without losing my place so I'm next there to get one as well. I was going to wait on the white one, but if they are going to redesign anything I'm not so sure they will ever release the white iphone 4 (I hope I'm wrong). I just don't want to be caught waiting until sept or oct and missing out on the next iphone next summer. Luckily, my husband is eligible now for an upgrade from his 3gs, but could care less about the iphone 4, so I could always use his for the white one .

Mac pro delay again ?

its been more than one month since i ordered a customise mac pro and my dealer told me there will be delay in orders does any one facing the same ?

Only one advice: be patient.
I ordered mine (customized) on January 11th, got it on April 3rd. Almost 3 months, so you may have to wait a few more weeks, sorry.

Camera connection kit - useless delay Again

Well, the camera connection kit said 2-3 weeks ship 4 weeks ago, now it says 3-4 weeks, looks like I will be returning 5 of my brand new factory sealed iPads since apple can't seem to get it together, and when the few do come into a retail location, the employees buy them up and resell them.

Glen Handshu wrote:
Well, the camera connection kit said 2-3 weeks ship 4 weeks ago, now it says 3-4 weeks, looks like I will be returning 5 of my brand new factory sealed iPads since apple can't seem to get it together, and when the few do come into a retail location, the employees buy them up and resell them.
You know that the projection isn't an estimate of when they'll be readily available but an estimate of when you will receive yours if you order now. You don't have to wait for it to get to zero to order.
In other words... If you would have ordered 4 weeks ago you would have them already.

11.1.2.1 Release Delayed Again?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for