11.5.10.2 Technology Stack Validation Patch - Database validation report

Hi all,
I am trying to upgrade Oracle EBS 11.5.10 to 11.5.10.2. As per the Oracle instruction i am running 11.5.10.2 Technology Stack Validation utility. For Node Type admin, Conc, Web, Forms its working fine. But when i run this for Database, its giving me same report as for both the Node Type. So i am not able to know whether database is compatible or not. Even though i have done all the steps as mentioned in the README for 4318672.
Please advice.
Regards,

What about the report header? Does it show same info (node type, node name, context file, ..etc).
Did you source the Database Oracle Home environment file on database server node as the owner of database server oracle home file system before running the technology validation utility?

Similar Messages

Doubt with applying RUP 6 - running the Technology Stack Validation Utility

Hi.
I am following note 444524.1 in installing the RUP 6.
On page 39, Section 5 Step 4, we are told, under "Applying this patch" :
Oracle Applications Technoilogy Updates for 11.i.ATG_PF.H.delta.6 (RUP 6) contains a unified patch driver to be applied with AutoPatch. Please apply the driver file on all application tier server nodes"
Then we are given the name of the driver.
I am a little lost here - how do we verify we have this driver applied ? Do we apply this after the RUP ?? ? ?
EBS 11.5.10
AIX 5.2
Oracle 9.2.0.8
Well, it appears that this is part of the adpatch utility, though there is no mention of this in the document. With other patches, when adpatch is not required there is no mention of it. In this document there is no mention of it, and yet we need it.
Edited by: Dan A on Dec 1, 2008 10:43 AM
Edited by: Dan A on Dec 1, 2008 10:48 AM

Dan,
Simply, use adpatch to apply 11i.ATG_PF.H.delta.6 (RUP6) patch driver "u5903765.drv".

Tech Stack Validation Patch 4318672 - appsutil.zip issue

I am working on upgrading 11.5.9 - 11.5.10.2. I recently installed rollup patch 8217898. +(Pre-Update step #3)+
The install went successfully, I created the appsutil.zip, moved it to the DB server unpacked everything looked normal. The next step said to install the Technology Stack Validation Patch 4318672. +(Pre-Update step #4)+
I applied the patch, then the next step was to create the appsutil.zip file again. I did and moved it to the DB server. It next asks you to run the TXKScript.pl which runs the technology stack validation utility.
I get the error that the SID_Server.xml file is missing. The file is not in the new appsutil directory created. It was however in the previous one created when I installed 8217898.
I reapplied 8217898 and the appsutil.zip still creates without the SID_Server.xml file as well as a couple directories.
Before:+_
SID_Server.xml
admin
bin
driver
html
install
java
log
media
out
outbound
perl
scripts
sql
template
xml
Now:+_
bin
driver
html
java
media
perl
sql
template
xml
It seems I missed a step, but going back through the instructions I can't seem to find anything. Any ideas?
Thanks

I looked through just about every log that I could find actually, mostly trying to figure out what the different patches & process did, where it looked for things, etc. Most of the logs files I read through were located $APPL_TOP/admin/<SID>_<hostname>/log
The actual step that seemed to solve the problem was going through the steps for in Section #8 "Migrating to AutoConfig on the Database Tier" in document 165195.1 Using AutoConfig to Manage System Configurations with Oracle Applications 11i
We were using Autoconfig already so I am not sure exactly why that had to be done, but it re-created everything I needed.
But on a positive note as I have been going through each step of this process I have been learning quite a bit about where all these files live and how they interact.
Looking for how to verify in SIGNON_PASSWORD_HARD_TO_GUESS is set to N as required. I have been through all the documents listed, and they say what it is and what it does but I can't seem to find the screen in the application that has it defined. I know that it is N already because we can use passwords that are not complex, but I just wanted to dig through and see it and figure where all that side of things lives.
Thanks again for your help

Oracle technology stack

Hi. A question of terminology here:
What,exactly,is meant by Oracle technology stack? Is it a generic term to describe Oracle architecture?
This page http://awads.net/wp/2006/05/05/oracle-e-business-suite-technology-stack-and-products-cheat-sheet/ desribes E business suite and its 'technology stack' and it just looks like a reference to the way that Oracle architecture interacts with itself.
But when we choose,during cloning, the techstack option, this suggests something more specific.
Yet again, for example here http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/2008/12/top_2008_techstack_articles_for_ebs_11i_and_12.html there seems to be a more general reference to the way EBS works with the 'techstack'?
What is the techstack??
Thanks,
DA

Dan,
techstack (Technology Stack) components are database technology stack and application technology stack. In 11i, it is (8i/9i/10g) RDBMS and (8.0.6, iAS), and in R12 it is (10g/11g) RDBMS and (10.1.2.x AS + 10.1.3.x AS). Please refer to the installation manual (Installing Technology Stack Components) for details.
Applications Releases 11i and 12
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/applications.html
Regards,
Hussein

Technology Stack Inventory Validation Report r12.1

How do you run the Technology Stack Inventory Validation Report on R12.1?
I knew how to run it in 11i but it is not in the same place on R12.1

Thanks,
That provided some of what I was looking for but the Technology Stack Inventory Validation Report used to be
$ADPERLPRG $ORACLE_HOME/appsutil/bin/TXKScript.pl
-script=$ORACLE_HOME/appsutil/bin/txkVal11510MP.pl
-txktop=$ORACLE_HOME/appsutil
-appspass=<apps_password>
-outfile=$ORACLE_HOME/appsutil/temp/txkVal11510MP_DB.html
and the output looked like this:
Technology Validation Utility report for 11.5.10 Maintainance Pack.
===================================================================
The latest version of the Technology Validation Utility and instructions
are available in Oracle MetaLink Note 259484.1 .
Date :Mon Jun 28 16:19:52 2004
Hostname :apposf45.us.oracle.com
Node Type :Admin,Conc,DB,Web,Forms
Instance :PROD_apposf45
Platform :OSF1
DB Host :apposf45.us.oracle.com
Context File :/scratch/apps/disks/disk3/_apps_11510_ab_apps_prodappl/admin/PROD_apposf 45.xml
Report File :/scratch/disk1/_apps_11510_ab1.5/temp/txkVal11510MP.txt
Validation of Administration Server Node (apposf45):
[PASS] Database version from dbms_utility 9.2.0.3.0
[PASS] JOB_QUEUE_PROCESSES in parameter table 2
[PASS] Undo management in parameter table AUTO
[PASS] Database check confirms the fix for
materialized view
bug 2328821 has been applied.
[PASS] Amount of temporary tablespace in MB 1500
assigned to Apps Schema (determined
by querying DBA_TEMP_FILES and
DBA_USER)
[PASS] UTL_RECOMP package is found in the
database.
[PASS] The patch 2949941 for UTL_RECOMP has
been applied.
[PASS] The parallel_max_servers parameter is 8
set to
[PASS] Your Applications database contains 3.0.9.8.4
Portal version
[PASS] Your Applications database contains 3.0.9.8.4
Login Server version
Validation of Concurrent Processing Server Node (apposf45):
[PASS] 'X11 DISPLAY' parameter from the fuji01.us.oracle.com:35.0
Applications Context file
[PASS] JDK on Concurrent Processing node 1.3.1
[PASS] AF_JRE_TOP, AF_CLASSPATH and AFJVAPRG
variables are correct.
....

Technology Stack (TXK) Rollup Validation Report

Hi Hussein,
I got this output for Autoconfig validation report:
OEM comment" from the Applications Context file is:
If you are using the Oracle Enterprise Manager from the iAS Oracle Home within the Applications install,
you must update the "OEM comment" (s_oemcomment) value in the Applications Context file to blank.
# WARNING
"Session toplevel domain comment" from the Applications Context file is:
If you are using Oracle Portal with Applications, you must update the "Session toplevel domain comment"
(s_topleveldomain_comment) value in the Applications Context file to blank.
# WARNINGIm confused which context file to edit, as there are lots located in different directories. I am afraid I might erroneously edit it or mess up the context file.
Which one do I edit?
Thanks

Im confused which context file to edit, as there are lots located in different directories. I am afraid I might erroneously edit it or mess up the context file.
Which one do I edit?The application context file under $APPL_TOP/admin directory (make sure you take a backup of the file before you edit it).
If you do not use OEM or Oracle Portal, you can simply ignore those warning messages -- See (Technology Validation Utility for Oracle Applications Release 11.5.10 [ID 277366.1]) for details.
Thanks,
Hussein

Technology Stacks

Hi Hussein,
I am reviewing questions for a job interview :D
Is there difference/changes/updates about EBS 11i and R12.1 Technology Stacks?
Thanks a lot,
MsK

Hi,
I mean which tech stack does apache belongs based on the figure above?Under the "Web Services" -- See the concept manual.
And where is Concurrent Manager?No changes have been done on the CM and it is under "Concurrent Processing Server" -- Again, see the concept manual
I just hate job interviews, going too much details, memorization, bookish theories :(
It is much in different real life where u just deal the basic things.You do not have to memorize, just understand the concept.
As far as I know I can install EBS, clone, patch, upgrade, setup RMAN Backups, do recovery, assist functionals in their problems, raise SR, do some customize reports, configure printer, load data using interfaces tables. etc.
with the help of forums :D, metalink, & google.As far as you are aware of the above and you can do those tasks you should be OK.
In short I can deliver output required, without "understanding" so much of the theory details.Theory is essential but not a must as long as you understand how the components work and what each tier/component is responsible for. We always refer to the documentation so there is nothing wrong about it.
But the problem is I can not often flunk on interviews and certification :( . That's another story, and you are not alone :)
Don't you think its unfair :DKeep reading and reading and reading, then practice what you read, it should be fair then :)
Good luck with your job interview!
Thanks,
Hussein

OAF vs Fusion Technology Stack

Hi all,
We have developed custom business processes (similar to SSHR actions like Termination, Salary Change, etc...) where you enter data through an OAF page or pages, optionally go through approvals and then update Apps or some other application through appropriate APIs.
We are in the process of reworking the actions and adding numerous more and are going through the decision process on whether to develop using OAF or the Fusion Technology Stack.
Has anyone come across white papers or other discussions on which to use going forward? Will OAF be around in 2008 when Fusion comes out, does a current 11.5.10.2 architecture support developing with the Fusion Tech Stack (like does the latest approved AS work with JDev 10.1.3?).
Looking for some type of decision checklist on which should be used.
Thanks, Rob

Rob, OAF will be supported in all pre Fusion releases. Fusion is going to be based on ADF techstack and there might be a lot of architecture change both in technology and product lines. So if you are planning to migrate to Fusion sometime when it gets released you need to analyse if the customizations are even relevant with that product line at that point of time(It is difficult to comment without understanding the extent of change in product lines).
You should be able to use 10.1.3 techstack with OAF in the future releases. You should wait for the actual release milestones to get documentation on that, I can only provide pointers on that now(I work with Oracle development).
It is your decision to customize applications using OAF or ADF at this point. We can recommend the best approach of doing customizations with the current ebusiness suite. If you use OAF you get a lot of advantages of using extension hooks and deploying customizations in a upgrade safe manner. You get the underlying AOL/J security infrastructure for free when developing new pages and integrating them. If you choose to develop your applications using ADF then you need to take care of all these things as well as you will be running applications in two different technologies OAF(ebusiness suite) and ADF(your custom development). You should then try and integrate these two pieces.

Problem unpacking NWDS Stack 9 Patch 1

Hello,
I've downloaded SP stack 9 patch 1 of Netweaver Developer Studio and am encountering the following error when I try to unpack the files using SAPCAR:
SAPCAR: could not open for writing ./J2EE-RUNT-CD/IDE/eclipse/plugins/com.sap.tc
.ap/comp/CAF/DCs/sap.com/caf/mp/mmr/reader/_comp/gen/default/public/com.sap.caf.
rt.bol.exceptions/lib/java/com.sap.caf.rt.bol.exceptions.jar (error 28). The sys
tem cannot find the path specified
Any help with resolving this problem would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Brian

Problem has been solved. Issue was caused by following the Installation guide and trying to unpack both the J2EE engine and Netweaver Developer Studio into the same directory structure.

CRVS2010 Beta - Error: No valid Report Source is available

I am new to using crystal reports in .NET so any (un-jargoned) help is much welcomed and appreciated.
I am implementing an web application on a Windows XP machine using VS2010 and have downloaded and installed the CR4VS2010 beta 2 and the CRforNET40_x86. All installed OK with no errors.
I have embedded a crystal report viewer into my web page and have populated a dataset (myDS) successfully from my SQL server connection earlier in the code.
The report (stoppages.rpt) is an untyped report stored in a separate folder and has 2 datetime parameters to pass in. When I run the web app it runs fine until the parameter boxes appear - I enter 2 valid date values into the parameter boxes when I hit OK I get an error - No valid report source is available.
My code is shown below - I have searched other forums and it was suggested to put in the session.add part but the error occurs with or without this bit in...
Please help - newbie and desparate! Thanks
Dim myReportDocument = New CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument()
            myReportDocument.Load("C:\Reports\stoppages.rpt")
            myReportDocument.SetDataSource(myDS)
            Session.Add("Report", myReportDocument)
            crvThisReport.ReportSource = myReportDocument
Subject modified as per the sticky post at the top of this forum; [Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2010 Beta - read before posting|Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2010 Beta - read before posting;
Edited by: Ludek Uher on Oct 13, 2010 7:22 AM

Hi Ludek, I tried adding
<startup useLegacyV2RuntimeActivationPolicy="true">
<supportedRuntime version="v4.0"/>
</startup>
to the config file but it didnt resolve the problems.
However I think I have found a work-around solution to setting the parameters programmatically rather than use the crystal report viewer pop-up boxes. I am posting my code to help anyone else who might be experiencing the same problems:
Dim myReportDocument = New CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument()
myReportDocument.Load(Server.MapPath(strRptPath))
myDS.WriteXml(Server.MapPath(strXMLPath), XmlWriteMode.WriteSchema)
myReportDocument.SetDataSource(myDS)
myReportDocument.Refresh()
myReportDocument.SetParameterValue("DateFrom", #9/1/2010 6:35:00 AM#)
myReportDocument.SetParameterValue("DateTo", #9/8/2010 6:35:00 PM#)
crvThisReport.ReportSource = myReportDocument
DateFrom and DateTo are the parameter names within my crystal report.
It seems to be working fine, it stops the crystal report viewer from displaying the parameter pop-up box which stops the error occurring. However, the error still occurs when you want to interact with the report in other ways, ie page navigation, group tree navigation. It still allows me to print, export and zoom in and out, so I will have to disable some buttons and features until this error is resolved - the search continues!
Thanks for all your help and advise.
Edited by: juliep68 on Oct 14, 2010 11:33 PM

REP-1057: ' PATH_TO_REPORT/report.rdf' is not a valid Report Builder file.

Current Level : Report Builder 6.0.8.27.0
We migrated custom reports build on Report 2.5 to 6.0.8.27.0 on apps/db version
from 11.0.3 / 8.0.5 to 11.5.10.2/9.2.0.6. Platform was moved from HPUX to Redhat
Linux 4.
When we open migrated reports then original reports get converted and compiled
by Report Builder 6 without any problem. But once saved and when modified some
of the reports get corrupted and have 'REP-1057' error.
Anyone had any similar problem and found solution?
Thanks

I have a .rdf file. When I try to open the same in Report Builder for 6i, nothing happens! It just does not open!
I tried to convert the report into .REX from unix - I get the following error
REP-1057: 'FAIAPXINROH.rdf' is not a valid Report Builder file.
But, the report is running fine from Oracle apps.
I need to open this .rdf to change somethings.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Arun Tirumale

BPC 7.0MS Validation Report isn't displayed

Hello colleage,
This question is related to the following thread.
[BPC - Submitted data did not pass validation|Re: BPC - Submitted data did not pass validation;
<Procedure>
-eSubmit > Validate submission
-The message is displayed:
"Submitted data did not pass validation; you may need to resubmit it.
A Validation report cannot be generated because there is no Validation report template."
I think that Validation report can be opened on this timing.
Are there missing settings?
If you have any information or ideas, could you please help me?
<Setting>
Application Parameter
LOCKREPORT: Validate.xlt
Validation Report
eExcel\Input Schedules\Wizard\Validate.xlt
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Kei Ogino
Edited by: Kei Ogino on Jun 24, 2009 11:00 AM

Hi Ki Ogino,
We have tested the behaviour for the same scenario.
You get this error, if the template is opened from the /INPUT SCHEDULE/WIZARD or the template not accessible from the relevant location.
Otherwise, able to succesfully validate the data submission by both ways:
1. eSubmit :: Validate Submission
2. Send Data :: Validate Submission before sending.
The issue noticed is that data not refreshed / displayed in the input template after succesful sending into BPC database, whereas the same data can be viewed by new template or ANYBYANY report.
Setting -- APPLICATION PARAMETER for LOCKREPORT.
The report launches when submission validation for a data region is not u20180u2019 in BPC Excel. The template should be located in the eExcel\Report\ folder., though it is currently available in the path eExcel\Input Schedules\Wizard\Validate.xlt.
Try this.
Cheers
Uma

Essbase Adapter - Intersection validation report

Is it possible to enable an intersection validation report with the essbase adapter? Otherwise I dont see my errors until the export stage

No, you will need to write a custom script to accomplish this.

Foundation / Workspace in validation report failed SSO

Hi everybody.
When I run validate.bat to watch the status of my EPM System - I get one red line in Foundation / Workspace block:
Availability of login http://server.com:28080/workspace/status
Error: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect
Recommended Action: Start application
All EPM System is installed on one laptop running under Win XP SP3.
Essbase ver 11.1.2
The failure in validation report does not affect availibility of essbase server - I can work with applications through Essbase admin services console.
Please help to understand what is wrong and how to fix it.
Thanks.
Edited by: user10944635 on 17.08.2010 6:59

How did u solve it?

Source Account Validation Report

Goodmorning,
I'm building source validation rules (without problem) but a boring problem occurs:
Scenario:
Location -- E2 (source entity:00002)
|__ E6 (source entity:00006)
|__ E7 (source entity:00007)
Validation report result:
E2
Rule 1 amount 123
Rule 2 amount 456
Rule 3 (source logic account based on 00002 accounts) 789
E6
Rule 1 amount 1000 (OK)
Rule 2 amount 5000 (OK)
Rule 3 (source logic account based on 00002 accounts) 789 [duplicated]
E7
Rule 1 amount 8000 (OK)
Rule 2 amount 9000 (OK)
Rule 3 (source logic account based on 00002 accounts) 789 [duplicated]
This means that for every rule based on source account and for every Entity I've a duplicated rule.
Obviously it's wrong and I know I need source entity (00002) to build correctly my source validation rule...
Q: how can I solve this issue avoiding duplicated rules? Building the same validation rule respectively for every source entity logic account the result would be an undesired report with 9 rules instead of 3.
Thanks,
Francesco

What version was this on and did you use assign Validation Entity and Rule groups?

11.5.10.2 Technology Stack Validation Patch - Database validation report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for