1440 x 900 native resolution?

1440 x 900 native resolution, is this used for wide screen monitors?
Art

Yes, that is a typical resolution for 19" wide monitors.

Similar Messages

Display problems with 19" widescreen HannsG 1440 x 900 LCD monitor

I recently purchased a Hanns G 19" widescreen LCDdisplay for my Mac Mini G4 computer. When I plugged the display into the DVI port it correctly recognized that the display has a 1440 x 900 native resolution. Unfortunately, the display text is "fuzzy" like it is masking the native resolution of the monitor with another resolution. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to solve this problem.
One note, the display works great on a PC with the video card set to 1440 x 900 so this is a mac mini problem.
Thanks!

I think that is meant to be a feature, not a bug. If you go into the Utilities folder inside the Applications folder you will see a small app called DigitalColor Meter. Open it and you will see that it works like a digital magnifying glass. Pass the cursor over some text and you will see a blow up version of OS Xs font anti-aliasing technology. This technology allows text of all sizes to render well on the screen. But users crossing over from OS 9 or WIndows first experience this "feature" as inferior looking screen text. Eventually you will get used to it.

NX7100GS sets wrong native resolution through DVI

I was working ok with this configuration:
CPU: Pentium 4 2.26GHz
Motherboard: Asus P4PE
Video: MSI FX5200 VTD128 (AGP)
Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 940BW (19 inch wide) using DVI connector at 1440x900.
Then changed my PC, but kept the monitor. The new confguration is:
CPU: Core2 Duo 1.8GHz
Motherboard: Asus P5N-E SLI
Video: MSI NX700GS TD128E (PCI-X)
Now I can't use the 1440x900 resolution with DVI. The card forces the monitor to work at 1280x1024 (I can see this in the monitor info panel), so everything looks blurry and the width of the desktop doesn't fit on the screen. It works ok with the VGA connector.
I'm using nVidia Forceware 162.18
Please help. Thanks.

Richard
I found this setting 3 times:
Control Panel/Display Properties/Settings/Screen resolution says: 1440 by 900 pixels (maximum).
NVIDIA Control Panel/Display/Change resolution says: 1440 by 900 pixels (maximum).
NVIDIA Control Panel/Display/Change flat panel scaling says: Native resolution 1440 by 900, current resolution: 1440 by 900
BUT
The monitor (using the physical monitor buttons) says 1280x1024.
Also, I noticed all the software settings say 60 Hz, but the monitor says 75 Hz.
Thanks in advance

Resolution 1440 x 900 for Windows applications?

I am attempting to use MacBook Pro (15") to run Windows applications. Some of these are written for a screen resolution of 1280 x 1050, but the max available on the MBP is seemingly 1440 x 900. Is there any way around this, short of buying an external monitor or the 17" MBP?

I was thinking of a solution along the lines of, maybe the device handlers could reduce the Windows app image to the lower native resolution, which could then be displayed.

Why do 15.4" Macbook Pro's not support resolutions greater than 1440 x 900?

Hi.
I am a Microsoft .net software developer and am seriously considering getting a Macbook Pro to do some iPhone development. My company has provided me with a 15.4" Dell Precision M4400 that features an LED-backlit screen and nVidia Quadro FX 770M discrete graphics card, supporting 1920 x 1200 native resolution. I'd like to know why the 15.4" Macbook Pro's do not support anything greater than 1440 x 900 when it seems entirely possible? I understand that 17" MBP's do support 1920 x 1200 but it is not currently an option I'm considering pursuing due to the increased size and weight.
Thanks.
Jon
Message was edited by: jonb86uk

Just to be clear, since you're bringing up graphics cards - the 15" MBP supports up to 2560x1600 resolution on an external display, and simultaneously supports full native resolution on the internal display. As Phil points out, the native resolution of the 15" MBP's internal display is 1440x900, and Apple does not offer a higher resolution option for that model (although higher resolution 15" displays do exist). As to why that's the case, only Apple can answer that or change that.
You can submit feedback to Apple: http://www.apple.com/feedback/macbookpro.html.
As you know, if you want to use the iPhone SDK, you need an Intel-based Mac running Mac OS 10.5 Leopard.
Ps. Welcome back, Phil!!

Support for 1440 X 900 resolution

Does anyone know if I will be able to use the native resolution of 1440 X 900 with the NVIDIA GeForce 6600 LE with 128MB GDDR SDRAM?
Thanks

Hi, SophiaHat and a Warm Welcome to Apple Discussions and the G5 Power Mac forum!
Do you have or are you buying a dual-core G5 with the PCI Express graphics?
http://www.apple.com/powermac/graphics.html
Which display do you have or are getting?
Can you link to the exact card you are thinking about?

1440 x 900 resolution DVI?

Will my Dual Core Mac Mini support 1440 x 900 resolution if I buy a Widescreen TFT LCD Monitor?
Mac Mini Intel Dual Core, 2gb RAM Mac OS X (10.4.8)

There's no doubt the mini supports the resolution, and if the system correctly detects and identifies the display when connected, it would generally set itself to the display's default or native resolution, and offer (in the display preference panel) any other settings the display supports.
However, not all displays are correctly detected, and if not, initially the system will set itself to a low resolution default. If that happens, the display preference panel will not show the correct display model number, but you should be able to set it by clicking the 'detect display' button to force the system to check.
In a very few instances (and with some TVs connected) the system will still not correctly detect the display, in which case a third party utility such as SwitchResX would be needed. It rarely is for dedicated displays however, usually only for TVs.

Older Macbook Pro Resolution stuck at 1440 x 900

I have mid 2011 Macbook Pro 13" 2.53 GHz Intel Core i5 running 10.6.6. Recently it has developed a problem with the resolution settings. The highest resolution I can achieve is 1440 x 900 in Syetem prefs. It also means that i cannot see all the screen at one time. I have tried to delete any prefs I can see with Displays in them and it has made no difference.
Has anybody seen this problem before I have never come across anything like this before. I am currently downloading the 10.6.8 combo update and may try an update to Mountain Lion if this doesn't work.
Thank you in advance

You know what I can't remember, pehaps its not the resolution that's the problem, it's just that I cannot see the whole screen at once as if it has been zoomed, but as far as I can tell it hasn't. Made me think a bit differently about it. Thanks

13" Cannot set screen resolution in Windows 7 to 1440 by 900

Just finished installing BootCamp with Windows 7 Pro. For some reason the screen resolution in Windows display driver only goes up to 1200 not 1440 x 900. On MacOS it is obviously working fine. Any ideas?

On my MacBook Air 11 with Windows 7 64 bit I experience an even worse situation: when ever trying to install a NVidia driver (also when following the mentioned instructions) the setup executable reports - after a check of system compatibility - that no compatible graphic hardware (=320m) could be found. Luckily at least MacOS X is aware of a NVidia 320m installed.
Any Idea? Thanks

NX6600 VTD128E Diamond Edition does it support 1440 x 900 resolution

Hi everybody
This is my first posting to this forum. I soon have all the parts together to build my new rig. The only thing missing is the monitor. I am very interested in the ViewSonic VA1912w which is a 19" LCD Wide Screen Monitor with the resolution 1440 x 900. To get the full performance the Graphic card should be able to support this resolution. Thanks for your advice.

the graphic card should be able to do it, just make sure you install the monitor driver, which will either be on a disk included with it, or you may have to download it from the manufacturer's website, or through Windows Update

Increasing screen resolution beyond 1440 x 900

Hello, is there a way to increase the screen resolution beyond 1440 x 900? The result I'm hoping for is one I can accomplish in Windows in that it creates a sort of virtual screen that becomes viewable when one moves the mouse pointer to that which is off-screen, thus bringing it on screen.
The entire desktop would shift to display only that 1440 x 900 of the, say, 1920 x 1200. I don't know what this is technically termed and I hope I've explained it well enough. Thanks!

Check out VirtueDesktops - OSX 10.5 Leopard has 'Spaces' built-in which is very similar

1440 x 900 resolution on X200

I have an X200s that supports 1440 x 900 resolution but my x200 only goes up to 1280 x 800 but appears to use the same chipset. How can I get my x200 up to 1440 x 900 resolution?
thanks.

you need a new WXGA+ LCD, i think that would cost around around 400 to 600 dollars.
Regards,
Jin Li
May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

Screen Resolution 1440 x 900

I have a MS-6533E Motherboard (I think it is also known as 6533XG.
I am using the onboard video and cannot get the resolution of 1440 x 900 to display with my acer monitor AL1916W.
I have updated to latest video drivers but still no luck.
Can anyone please assist?
Thanks

Hi this is usually caused when the display drivers are not installed correctly. Firstly you could try updating your monitor drivers, as this defines what resolution your monitors supports etc.

Refurbished 13.3-inch MacBook Air 1.8GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 Originally released June 2012 13.3-inch (diagonal) LED-backlit glossy widescreen display, 1440-by-900 resolution 4GB memory 256GB flash storage 720p FaceTime HD camera Intel HD Graphics 4

Is $1019 a good price?

Can you tell me why you don't think its a good buy? Someone bought it that must have thought it was a good buy? You?!!!
I had a macbook pro, spilled an entire latte on it. Cannot afford to drop another 1500 on a new one. I understand the air is a great machine. And for someone that is hard on equipment (aside from liquid!) with no moving parts its a better option. This one is priced at $929 - good?
Refurbished 13.3-inch MacBook Air 1.3GHz dual-core Intel Core i5
Originally released June 2013
13.3-inch (diagonal) LED-backlit glossy widescreen display, 1440-by-900 resolution
4GB memory
128GB flash storage
720p FaceTime HD camera
Intel HD Graphics 5000

External Display native resolution suddenly not available

Hello,
I'm using a Westinghouse LCM-22w3 external monitor with my MBP, connected via a DVI-to VGA adapter. I've used this computer/monitor setup for quite some time with no problem. Yesterday, I hooked my computer up to my 46" Samsung HDTV with no problem.
When I hooked my computer back up to the Westinghouse, the native resolution (1680x1050) was no longer available. Instead, the monitor hooks up at 1600x1000. Strangely, though, the EDID information appears to suggest that 1680x1050 should be available. Here's the EDID:
DDC block report generated by SwitchResX version 4.1.1 for display
LCM-22w3
------------------- RAW DATA ------------------------
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
0 | 00 FF FF FF FF 91 FF 00 5C 85 03 22 01 01 01 01
1 | 13 11 01 03 68 2F 1E 78 2E C5 85 A4 59 49 9A 24
2 | 12 50 54 BF EF 00 81 80 81 40 71 4F 95 00 95 0F
3 | B3 00 81 C0 81 00 21 39 90 30 62 1A 27 40 68 B0
4 | 36 00 D9 28 11 00 00 1C 00 00 00 FD 00 38 4C 1E
5 | 52 10 00 0A 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 FF 00 30
6 | 0A 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 FC
7 | 00 4C 43 4D 2D 32 32 77 33 0A 20 20 20 20 00 1D
< 00FFFFFF FF91FF00 5C850322 01010101 13110103 682F1E78 2EC585A4 59499A24 125054BF EF008180 8140714F 9500950F B30081C0 81002139 9030621A 274068B0 3600D928 1100001C 000000FD 00384C1E 5210000A 20202020 20200000 00FF0030 0A202020 20202020 20202020 000000FC 004C434D 2D323277 330A2020 2020001D >
Invalid EDID block: checksum failed. Last byte should be 8B
------------------- MAIN EDID BLOCK -----------------
EDID Version........1.3
Manufacturer........WDE
Product Code........802 (0322) (2203)
Serial Number.......01010101
Manufactured........Week 19 of year 2007
Max H Size..........47 cm
Max V Size..........30 cm
Gamma...............2.20
Display Supported Features:
Power Management: Active off
Display type:
RGB color display
Display is non continuous frequency
Default color space is sRGB standard
Preferred timing mode includes Native Pixel Format
Input signal & sync:
Analog input with: 0.700V / 0.000V
Composite Sync
Color info:
Red x = 0.644 Green x = 0.286 Blue x = 0.143 White x = 0.313
Red y = 0.348 Green y = 0.603 Blue y = 0.070 White y = 0.329
Established Timings:
720 x 400 @ 70Hz
640 x 480 @ 60Hz
640 x 480 @ 67Hz
640 x 480 @ 72Hz
640 x 480 @ 75Hz
800 x 600 @ 56Hz
800 x 600 @ 60Hz
800 x 600 @ 72Hz
800 x 600 @ 75Hz
832 x 624 @ 75Hz
1024 x 768 @ 60Hz
1024 x 768 @ 70Hz
1024 x 768 @ 75Hz
1280 x 1024 @ 75Hz
Manufacturer Reserved Timings:
Standard Timing Identification:
#0: 1280 x 1024 @ 60Hz (8180)
#1: 1280 x 960 @ 60Hz (8140)
#2: 1152 x 864 @ 75Hz (714F)
#3: 1440 x 900 @ 60Hz (9500)
#4: 1440 x 900 @ 75Hz (950F)
#5: 1680 x 1050 @ 60Hz (B300)
#6: 1280 x 720 @ 60Hz (81C0)
#7: 1280 x 800 @ 60Hz (8100)
Monitor Description blocks:
Descriptor #0 - Timing definition:
Mode = 1680 x 1050 @ 59.954Hz
Pixel Clock............. 146.25 MHz Non-Interlaced
Horizontal Vertical
Active.................. 1680 pixels 1050 lines
Front Porch............. 104 pixels 3 lines
Sync Width.............. 176 pixels 6 lines
Back Porch.............. 280 pixels 30 lines
Blanking................ 560 pixels 39 lines
Total................... 2240 pixels 1089 lines
Scan Rate............... 65.290 kHz 59.954 Hz
Image Size.............. 473 mm 296 mm
Border.................. 0 pixels 0 lines
Sync: Digital separate with
* Positive vertical polarity
* Negative horizontal polarity
Descriptor #1 - Monitor limits:
Horizontal frequency range.......30-82 kHz
Vertical frequency range.........56-76 Hz
Maximum bandwidth unspecified
Descriptor #2 - Serial number:
0
Descriptor #3 - Monitor name:
LCM-22w3
Any ideas? Switchresx didn't work, either

Well, you can move the file from the desktop back to its original location to at least get back to what you had before.
The file structure under Snow Leopard has changed and it's hard to keep up with this stuff. There is also now a com.apple.WindowServer.plist file in /System/Library/LaunchDaemons that you could try moving to the desktop and restarting. I dunno. Same rule applies.....if it doesn't help, move the file from the desktop back to its original location.

1440 x 900 native resolution?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for