160N Version 1 - Wireless Range Degrading Over Time

Hello,
I have owned a version 1.0 160N now for about 5 months and all was well with everything. The range was better than any router I owned in the past until about three weeks ago when connectivity to my furthest outlying wireless adapters began to get worse. It has been slowly degrading to the point that I cannot get a reliable connection unless the computer is within 30 foot clear line of sight. Symptom is that PING to the router is not reliable and Web pages will not load even though the connection is made and maintained. I was wondering if any others have experienced this degradation in range over time. It is to the point now where I may ditch it and go get a 54G if I can find one. Will a hard reset and configuration reload possibly solve the issue. I also see that a firmware upgrade is available that is supposed to "improve wireless range" is available for the 1.0 version. Has anyone done this upgrade with ill effects or a noticiable increase in range? It is a total pain to have reconfigure all the MAC filtering and Port Forwarding but at this rate I will soon have a shiney, sleek, black doorstop. Thanks for any insight you can provide.

Yes you can Upgrade the router's firmware as it would improve your wireless range...
Download Firmware 2.89MB...
Follow these steps to upgrade the firmware on the device: -
Open an Internet Explorer browser page.In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1
Leave the username blank & in password use admin in lower case...
Click on the 'Administration' tab- Then click on the 'Firmware Upgrade' sub tab- Here click on 'Browse' and browse the .bin firmware file and click on "Upgrade"...
Wait for few seconds until it shows that "Upgrade is successful" After the firmware upgrade, click on "Reboot" and you will be returned back to the same page OR it will say "Page cannot be displayed".
Press and hold the reset button for 30 seconds...Release the reset button...Unplug the power cable from your router, wait for 30 seconds and re-connect the power cable...Now re-configure your router...

Similar Messages

Movie degradation over time

I have sometimes had movies degrade over time. I have one specifically that I am looking at now that is a gray scale microscopy movie was made in 2006 with Cinepak and looked fine when first made. Now the first frame and several other frames (but not all) are dramatically posterized to a uniform gray. Sometimes I have seen a different degradation where you get blocks of pixels that turn uniform gray was if you reduced the resolution of the image. Is this a Cinepak issue or a Quicktime issue? Is there any way of recovering the data or preventing it from happening?

Grandpa,
Sadly, writable media DOES degrade over time - sometimes after a year or so. Cheap media (and sometime not-so cheap media), improper storage conditions (hot, sunlight, high humidity) and high burn errors during burning (result of high burn speeds over 4x) can all contribute to degradation.
Roxio's new Toast Titanium 8 now includes the ability to recover data from some damaged discs - it's probably worth trying.
Problems with the long term storage of digial images remain digital imaging's 'diry little secret' - see http://www.frontiernet.net/~fshippey/archiving.htm for an article I wrote on the subject.
F Shippey

Internet performance degrades over time with AirPort Extreme

Hello, we have an AirPort Extreme (802.11n) which is about two years old, and I've noticed lately that if I don't reset it for say, a month or so, internet speeds become extremely slow, and there is no way to regain normal speeds without resetting it... I was just wondering if this is normal for an AirPort Extreme, and also, could this be due to the age of the unit (i.e. do AirPort Extremes slowly lose performance over time, and is buying a new one the only answer)? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!

U have to find a good channel.
on 2.4ghz this is 6 unless other routers in the area are using it. if so use another channel.
Other things that can interfere: Microwave oven, frige - any thing that emits em fields
5ghz is better.
vicinity of your laptop makes a big difference - i get up to 57Mbps on speedtest net in vicinity of time capsule @ 5ghz.
Best performance is on ethernet cable.
Hope this helps

Please help me figure out why this thread's performance degrades over time

Hello.
The code below is from a Runnable that I've tested inside a Thread operating on a TreePath array of size 1500; the array 'clonedArrayB' is this TreePath array. The code is designed to create a more stepped version of setSelectionPaths(TreePath[]) from class JTree.
The performance decrease of the thread is very rapid; this is discernible simply from viewing the println speed. When it gets to about 1400 TreePaths added to the JTree selection, it's running at roughly 1/10 the speed it started running at.
I know there's no problem with maintaining a set of selected paths of that size inside a JTree. I also know that the thread stops when it should. So it must be some operation I'm performing inside the brief piece of code shown below that is causing the performance degradation.
Does anyone have any idea what could be causing the slowdown?
Many thanks for your help. Apologies if you would have liked an SSCCE, but I very much doubt it's necessary for this. Either you can see the problem or you can't. And sadly I can't x:'o(
int indexA = 0;
public void run() {
     // Prevent use of / Pause scanner
     try {
          scannerLock.acquire();
     } catch (InterruptedException exc) {
          Gecko.logException("Scanner lock could not be acquired by expansion thread", exc);
     while (!autoExpansionComplete) {
          while (indexA < clonedArrayA.length) {
               int markerA = indexA + 10;
               for (int a = indexA; a < markerA && a < clonedArrayA.length; a++) {
                    pluginTreeA.addSelectionPath(clonedArrayA[a]);
               indexA = markerA;
               System.out.println(indexA + "," + clonedArrayA.length);
                    if (autoExpansionComplete) {
                         break;
               stop();
};

Well, since I've had no responses, I tried to think of other ways to speed the code up.
I'd already made nearly every tweak I know. The only additional thing I could think of was to use addSelectionPaths(TreePath[]) on a subarray of the cloned array, instead of addSelectionPath(TreePath) on the cloned array's elements, since obviously it would be fewer method calls. It has sped things up an awful lot (my new code is shown below - I've left in some things I chopped out above, so you can see exactly what I see). The problem is though, obviously an increase in initial velocity doesn't solve the problem of deceleration occurring, if you get me.
// Clone the selection arrays to non-volatile arrays for better access
// speeds
final TreePath[] clonedArrayA = selectionPathsArrayA.clone();
final TreePath[] clonedArrayB = selectionPathsArrayB.clone();
// Create a new runnable to perform the selection task
Runnable selectionExpander = new Runnable() {
     /** Position within cloned array A */
     int indexA = 0;
     /** Position within cloned array B */
     int indexB = 0;
     /** Length of subarray grabbed from cloned array A */
     int lengthA;
     /** Length of subarray grabbed from cloned array B */
     int lengthB;
     /** Subarray destination */
     private TreePath[] subarray = new TreePath[100];
     public void stop() {
          autoExpansionComplete = true;
          automatedSelection = false;
          scannerLock.release();
      * Grabs 10 blocks of each selection paths array at a time, adding
      * these to the tree's current selection and then moving to the next
      * cycle
     public void run() {
          // Prevent use of / Pause scanner
          try {
               scannerLock.acquire();
          } catch (InterruptedException exc) {
               Gecko.logException("Scanner lock could not be acquired by expansion thread", exc);
          while (!autoExpansionComplete) {
               while (indexA < clonedArrayA.length || indexB < clonedArrayB.length) {
                    // Set subarray lengths
                    lengthA = subarray.length;
                    lengthB = subarray.length;
                    // If subarray length is greater than the number of
                    // remaining indices in the source array, set length to
                    // the number of remaining indices
                    lengthA = indexA + lengthA > clonedArrayA.length ? clonedArrayA.length - indexA : lengthA;
                    lengthB = indexB + lengthB > clonedArrayB.length ? clonedArrayB.length - indexB : lengthB;
                    // Create subarrays and add TreePath elements to trees'
                    // selections
                    System.arraycopy(clonedArrayA, indexA, subarray, 0, lengthA);
                    pluginTreeA.addSelectionPaths(subarray);
                    System.arraycopy(clonedArrayB, indexB, subarray, 0, lengthB);
                    pluginTreeB.addSelectionPaths(subarray);
                    // Remember the latest index reached in source arrays
                    indexA += lengthA;
                    indexB += lengthB;
                    System.out.println(indexA + "," + clonedArrayA.length);
                    System.out.println(indexB + "," + clonedArrayB.length);
                    if (autoExpansionComplete) {
                         break;
               stop();
// Create and start new thread to manage the selection task runner
selector = new Thread(selectionExpander);
selector.start();I really can't think what could be causing the slowdown. I've done everythng I can think of to increase the velocity, such as cloning the source arrays since they're volatile and access could be slightly slower as a result.
Nothing I try gets rid of the slowdown effect though :(
- Dave

REALTEK AUDIO DEGRADING OVER TIME WITH FLME - PC WINDOWS 7

I am having a real issue with the onboard Reatek audio card and The Flash Live Media Encoder. I am providing the signal to the onboard Realtk audio card via the mic in source on my computer. The video is coming from my DV cam. At first, the audio sounds fine but after a period of time, the audio begins to degrade until it becomes totally useless - muffled and weak. If I use the onboard DV mic, it's OK. Problem seems to be with the onboard Realtek card. Some times it appears to be related to making some changes in the FLME settings. If I reboot the computer, it fixes it for a while and then the problem starts again. Running a PC with Windows 7. Anyone else, experiencing this? I have had the same problem on two different machines.

There is no way to do it from windows direct to the TC.
It only presents AFP to the WAN side. And most ISP block SMB from internet access due to risks. There is AFAIK, no suitable AFP protocol utility for windows at the moment. If you google and find one, be aware it probably will not work to your satisfaction anyway.
You must use a Mac to access AFP but even then it is not a secure protocol and I would recommend against it anyway.
So basically if you had have asked before purchasing, I would have said, TC is unsuitable product. It is a backup drive for a Mac. It is not a NAS.. it is not designed for remote access by any computer other than a Mac. It does not support any other file protocol to the WAN interface.. and no secure protocol even there.
A NAS with Time Machine extensions from QNAP, Synology, Netgear all are designed for web access and are far more suitable. Researching a purchase beforehand is always worthwhile.
Anyway, your choices are.. return the TC and buy something more suited to the job.
Or if return is now impossible sell the TC on ebay.. etc and do the same thing.. buy a more suitable NAS.
Or buy a cheap mac mini (even second hand) and use that for communications with home.
Or, replace your current router with something that includes vpn. This is actually a good and commercially sound decision. VPN is generally used by business to connect to remote locations, because it is secure and will allow the greatest flexibility of connection. How hard or easy depends on the current setup. I would recommend a combined modem router with vpn server if you have adsl. Or for cable you can find plenty of routers with combined vpn. You can also use those for adsl if your ISP allows pppoe with bridged modem. The TC will have to be bridged as well. For other broadband it might be harder to find the right kind of box.
Once you setup a vpn you can access it from work using the appropiate vpn client in your work computer.

Sensor Mapping Express VI's performance degrades over time

I was attempting to do a 3d visualization of some sensor data. I made a model and managed to use it with the 3d Picture Tool Sensor Mapping Express VI. Initially, it appeared to work flawlessly and I began to augment the scene with further objects to enhance the user experience. Unfortunately, I believe I am doing something wrong at this stage. When I add the sensor map object to the other objects, something like a memory leak occurs. I begin to encounter performance degradation almost immediately.
I am not sure how I should add to best add in the Sensor Map Object reference to the scene as an object. Normally, I establish these child relationships first, before doing anything to the objects, beyond creating, moving, and anchoring them. Since the Sensor Map output reference is only available AFTER the express vi run. My compromise solution, presently, is to have a case statement of controlled by the"First Call" constant. So far, performace seems to be much better.
Does anyone have a better solution? Am I even handling these objects the way the community does it?
EDIT: Included the vi and the stl files.
Message Edited by Sean-user on 10-28-2009 04:12 PM
Message Edited by Sean-user on 10-28-2009 04:12 PM
Message Edited by Sean-user on 10-28-2009 04:16 PM
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
test for forum.vi ‏105 KB
chamber.zip ‏97 KB

I agree with Hunter, your current solution is simple and effective, and I can't really visualize a much better way to accomplish the same task.
Just as a side-note, the easiest and simplest way to force execution order is to use the error terminals on the functions and VIs in your block diagram. Here'a VI snippet with an example of that based on the VI you posted. (If you paste the image into your block diagram, you can make edits to the code)
Since you expressed some interest in documentation related to 3D picture controls, I did some searching and found a few articles you might be interested in. There's nothing terribly complex, but these should be a good starting point. The first link is a URL to the search thread, so you can get an idea of where/what I'm searching.You'll get more hits if you search from ni.com rather than ni.com/support.
http://search.ni.com/nisearch/app/main/p/q/3d%20picture/
Creating a 3D Scene with the 3D Picture Control
Configuring a 3D Scene Window
Using the 3D Picture Control 'Create Height Field VI' to convert a 2D image into a 3D textured heigh...
Using Lighting and Fog Effects in 3d Picture Control
3D Picture Control - Create a Moving Texture Using a Series of Images
Changing Set Rotation and Background of 3D Picture Control
Caleb Harris
National Instruments | Mechanical Engineer | http://www.ni.com/support

Dlink Wireless Range Extender with Time Capsule Setup

Looking to setup a D-Link DAP-1320 on my time capsule to extend my wifi network. The D-link instructions are pretty basic, only two choices. WPS Setup, which the Time capsule does not have. And Web browser setup by going to dlinkap.local which only times out and does not load.
Any sugestions? thanks

Nope this cannot work.. Apple to Apple .. Dlink is banana.. Apples don't talk to bananas.
If the DAP-1320 has a WAP mode.. then plug it by ethernet into the TC and use like that. Not going to work any other way.

Extend Time Capsule Wireless Range

I am having trouble with my Time Capsule's wireless range. I am not a networking expert by any means. I own an old building that is 4 stories connected by stairs with thick walls. All the rooms ethernet cables converge in a cubby on the 3rd floor. I placed my Time Capsule in the cubby, but I couldn't receive a wireless signal from the 1st floor. This is ironic because I have an old Netgear G router that sends signals throughout all 4 floors. So I bought an Airport Express to extend my network wirelessly, but the signal has been unstable perhaps because the Time Capsule's wireless signal is too weak. So I want to connect the Airport Express on the 1st floor using the Ethernet link from the 3rd floor Time Capsule which is my main router. From my research, I discovered about WDS networks, which I believe you have to use in order to create a network with multiple Apple base stations linked through ethernet.
I called Applecare who told me:
-To connect from Time Capsule to Airport Express using Ethernet, must use WDS network. Setup Airport Express as Relay, NOT Remote.
-Relay- Direct ethernet connection from Time Capsule to Airport Express, then wireless connection from Airport Express to Macbook.
-Remote- Wireless signal from Time Capsule to Airport Express, then direct Ethernet connection from Airport Express to Macbook
I have several questions for you wise people out there:
1. To extend the Time Capsule wireless network using the Airport Express, but connected directly via ethernet, do I need to setup a WDS network?
2. I prefer to just use the simple Apple settings "extend network wirelessly". Will this setting only boost a wireless signal received from the Time Capsule? Can it not extend a wireless signal sent directly from Ethernet?
3. I'm considering getting a Quickertek Triband antenna to place outside the cubby. Anyone have any experience with Airport external antennas?:
http://www.quickertek.com/products/timecapsuletriband.php
Any information would be much appreciated! These networking issues have been giving me months of headache.
Thank you!
Alexander
Specs:
Apple Time Capsule 1TB
Airport Express N version
Connected with 2.4ghz. band to N capable Macs.

Extending your network with an AirPort Express (AX) won't boost the TimeCapsule's (TC's) range per se. It will expand the network's range by adding another transceiver.
If you'd prefer to avoid using Ethernet to connect the TC and AX, you might get a better signal on the first floor if the AX was on the second floor, i.e, roughly halfway between the TC and the 1st-floor computer. [Extending the range of an 802.11n network|http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=AirPortUtility/5.1/en/ap21 24.html] describes how to configure them.
If an Ethernet linkup is no problem, though, that should work even better. In this case, it's best to use different (by 3 or more) channels on the 2 stations to reduce the chance that they'll interfere with each other.
Either way, it's best to use the same network name, network password, and encryption on both stations so you can roam freely through the building without needing to switch manually between them.
[Designing AirPort Networks 10.5-Windows manual|http://manuals.info.apple.com/enUS/Designing_AirPort_Networks10.5-Windows.pdf] is another good resource you may find helpful.

Time Capsule Wireless Speed degradation

Hi everyone,
I have a TC 500 GB, creating a Wi-fi network.
I have normally a IMac 20" connected, and sometimes other devices (PC, IPod).
The problem is that the Wireless speed of my connection get slow day by day, and after few day the speed is completely unaccetable.
To restore the original speed I found out two solution:
-HW reset (disconnect the power supply and then pressing the reset button before reconnecting to the power supply);
-change the firmware (I am continuinously changing between 7.3.1 and 7.3.2).
Does anybody face the same problem? I have already tried to change the wi-fi channel, the wirelles type (2.4 GHz or 5 GHz) but nothing changed.
Thanks for the help
Andrea

I've had the same problem and I'm on cable. But I have had this degradation of speed on the previous Apple Extreme airport as well as the Time Capsule I have.
I have cable. If I plug directly into the cable modem I will get 30-32 Mbps consistently. The claimed speed I am paying for.
But going to wireless, speed decreases over the day and I have to restart the TC. But as I said I had to do the same with the Extreme n Airport too.
Also no matter what, the Airport's have only ever delivered at best, 18Mbps. They never supply the full speed of the internet connection.
I personally believe the reason the speed decreases is heat. These beautifully designed Airports do get very hot. And I think this is why the speed decreases over the course of the day. If I leave it unplugged over night and boot it up in the morning, I get almost my full 30Mbps for a short time with the cold unit. But then through the day, as I work and actually can tell the connection is slowing, I run a speed test and I'm down to 18Mbps or even slower.
So I restart.
I think it's heat. Just my guess though.

I need to improve the wireless router range of my time capsule. What sort of extender (repeater?) should I be considering?

I need to improve the wireless router range of my time capsule. What sort of extender (repeater?) should I be considering? Will it affect my use of the time capsule as a hard drive backup?

In order to insure compatibility, you need to consider an Apple AirPort Express or AirPort Extreme if you are thinking about "extending" or "repeating" the network wirelessly.
It is also possible to extend the network by connecting an AirPort Extreme or Express back to the Time Capsule using a permanent wired Ethernet cable connection, which will provide better performance.
If you have a new "tower" model of the Time Capsule, then you would need a new "tower" version of the AirPort Extreme to take full advantage of the capabilities of the Time Capsule.
If you have an earlier "flat" or "square" version of the Time Capsule, then an AirPort Express would be a good match for the capabilities of the Time Capsule.
An "extender" will not affect the operation of your Time Capsule other than allow wireless devices to connect from a greater range at higher speeds.

Time Capsule Painfully slow internet over wireless (not so over ethernet)

I dont know what it is, but when I use the TC over wireless, it is over 10 times slower than if I just stick an ethernet cable in my macbook. I get 50k/sec TOPS over wireless. I get 600-2MB/sec over the ethernet.
Im seriously using an ethernet cable right now because I cant stand it.
I have restarted the thing 50 times now. (modem too)
I have an N capable macbook.
I have time machine TURNED OFF
I have tried all different frequencies.
It is not just my macbook, but every wireless device on the system.
I had an N basestation I replaced, it was super fast.
My ethernet and airport settings are identical.
I have tried. all settings of B,G,N 2.4 and 5ghz.
I have tried interference robustness on and off.
It is not the internet going to it, and it is not the environment it is in as It is sitting in the exact same place my N base station was in.
I seriously hate this thing right now... And I am as big of an apple fan as they come.
Please help me!

I unplugged it again and plugged it back in again... and it seems to have worked.
Why it didnt before, and how long this will last is anyones guess.
I just wish it was as reliable as my previous N base station.

My Verizon wireless service at my house has begun to degrade over the last 6 Month. It has begun to be very frustrating seeing how we switched over from Satellite to Verizon 4GLTE wireless device. How do I contact someone to see what the issue may be. Z

My Verizon wireless service at my house has begun to degrade over the last 6 Month. It has begun to be very frustrating seeing how we switched over from Satellite to Verizon 4GLTE wireless device. How do I contact someone to see what the issue may be. Zip Code 22580.

Out of curiosity how much data per month are you using? Another factor could be if neighbors have all done the same thing as you and the node is being overloaded on home internet use.

Given wireless range of Time Capsule is 150', will this work? Put DSL modem on phone line in garage, connect ethernet to small office bldg (125') and connect separate ethernet to main house (200'). Time capsule on each end (or Airport Express)? Thx

Given Time Capsule wireless range is 150', will this solution work? In detached garage, connect DSL modem to phone line, then connect ethernet cable to DSL modem and run 125' to small office bldg. Connect separate ethernet cable to DSL modem and run 200' to main house. Put time capsule or Airport Express in each bldg resulting in separate wireless networks in each? Thanks.

This will work very well. You can run a CAT5e (or CAT6) Ethernet cable up to 330 feet...or 100 meters...with virtually no signal loss.
CAT6 costs a bit more, but will handle next generation Ethernet speeds, so if you have a choice, suggest that you opt for CAT6 cabling.

WUMC710 could play as wireless range extender & Bridge role at same time?

If using bridge WUMC710, could it play the role as a wireless range extender for my wireless devices and at same time also as bridge to connect wired devices such as internet ready TV with router?

Hi,
The WUMC710 is only designed as a wireless bridge. There's no option to set it up as a repeater - bridge. Even DD-WRT don't have it on their compatible hardware list - only WAP54G. You might be interested on this DD-WRT Wiki article: Linking Routers: Repeater Bridge.
Check this table for comparison with current Linksys wireless bridges:
- Article ID 26631: WUMC710, WES610N and WET610N product comparison
If everyone needs to believe in something, I believe I'll have another beer..

Just installed a new time capsule and i want to use my airport express to extend my wireless range....time capsule working with existing devices at this time...but i am not able to get airport utility to recognize the airport express.....????

just installed a new time capsule and i want to use my airport express to extend my wireless range....time capsule working with existing devices at this time...but i am not able to get airport utility to recognize the airport express.....????

Temporarily connecting your AirPort Express to one of the Time Capsule's Etherent LAN <-> ports...as LaPastenagure suggests....is always a good way to setup and configure other network devices.
If you want to configure the Express using wireless, remember that the Express broadcasts a default wireless signal with a name like Apple Network xxxxxx. You must log on to this network first....no password is required....then open AirPort Utility to "see" the AirPort Express.

160N Version 1 - Wireless Range Degrading Over Time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for