1900 series warranty

Hi,
Can anyone clarify what does "1 year limited liability warranty" offer. This is with refrence to 1900 series router warranty.
I checked the Cisco Warranty Q&A (https://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/warranty_qa_guest.html) page but it does not also mention any thing with refrence to 1 year limited liability warranty.
Regards
ijlal

Per the 1900 Series Data Sheet:
Warranty Information
The Cisco 1900 Series Integrated Services Router have a 1 year limited liability warranty.
By the way this forum is dedicated to the Cisco Small Business routers, not really the best forum for the ISR routers. The best Support Forum for all Traditional Cisco products is the Cisco Netpro Support Forum (Netpro link at the near the top of this page).
Best Regards,
Glenn

Similar Messages

Does 1900 series router supports voice functon?

I have seen that 1921 and 1941 can insert a vwic3 interface card,but i cannot see pvdm on 1921&1941,my question is that how 1921&1941 support voice function(e.g voice termination)?

Hi.
Based on these docs, it does not support voice
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10538/prod_series_comparison.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6789/ps7290/ps10589/data_sheet_c78-598389.html
VWIC3 cards are not only for voice, that's why you can add them to a 1900 series router.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855/data_sheet_c36-609138.html
HTH
Regards
Carlo
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Configuring New Interface and NAT on Cisco 1900 Series Router.

Hello Cisco Team,
am asking for advise on how to how setup NAT rules and overload on my 2nd interface on my cisco 1900 series router,am not sure where am getting it wrong.
my router has 2 interface, interface one has IP address 10.5.5.5X and plugs into my ASA firwall and into my switch and works just fine.
i have just configured my second Interface with a new IP 172.16.0.X- i want to NAT my new IP address to our public IP address which is 41.77.X.X
my configuration so far are as follows.
GigabitEthernet0/0 172.16.0.X YES manual up up - Not working
GigabitEthernet0/1 10.5.5.X YES NVRAM up up- this works fine
GigabitEthernet0/0/0 41.77.X.X YES NVRAM up up

Hello Jon,
Thanks for your feedback, my router configuration are as follows.
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description WL2504
ip address 172.16.0.2 255.255.254.0
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description WAN
ip address 10.55.55.2 255.255.255.252
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
description LINK TO CLT INTERNET
ip address 41.X.X.130 255.255.255.248
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex full
speed 100
media-type sfp
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source list 1 interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 41.X.X.129
ip route 41.X.X.136 255.255.255.248 10.55.55.1
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.55.55.1
access-list 1 permit 10.55.55.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
from the router interface  interface GigabitEthernet0/0- I will connect it to my wireless Controller WL 2504

IOs for cisco 1900 series router

Hi,
Kindly provide me the IOS version (cisco 1900 router) which can fix the below listed Bugs,
Cisco IOS TCP Listener Crafted Packets Remote DoS (CSCek37177)
Cisco Multiple Devices Crafted IP Option Remote Code Execution (CSCeh52410)
Cisco IOS System Timers Remote Overflow (CSCei61732)
Cisco IOS Secure Shell Server TACACS+ Multiple DoS (CSCed65778, CSCed65285)
Cisco IOS IKE XAUTH ISAKMP IPSec SA Establish Authentication Bypass(CSCeg00277)
Cisco IOS Telnet Service DoS (CSCef46191)
Cisco IOS H.323 Protocol Implementation Flaws Cisco IOS Malformed IPv4 Packet Remote DoS Cisco SSH2 Server/Client Malformed Packet Remote DoS (CSCdz60229, CSCdy87221, CSCdu75477)
Cisco IOS SSH Large Packet CPU Consumption DoS (CSCdw33027) Cisco SIP Crafted INVITE Message Handling DoS (CSCdz39284, CSCdz41124) Cisco IOS Data-link Switching (DLSw) Capabilities Exchange Remote DoS (CSCsf28840)
Cisco IOS AAA RADIUS Long Username Authentication Bypass (CSCee45312)
Cisco IOS TCLSH AAA Command Authorization Bypass (CSCeh73049)
Cisco IOS MMP Stack Group Bidding Protocol (SGBP) Crafted UDP Packet Remote DoS (CSCsb11124)
Cisco IOS IPv6 Packet Processing Arbitrary Code Execution (CSCef68324)
Cisco IOS Malformed BGP Packet Processing Remote DoS (CSCee67450)
Cisco IOS Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Packet Remote DoS (CSCeb56909)
Cisco IOS IPv6 Packet Processing Remote DoS (CSCed40933)
Cisco IOS SCCP Control Protocol Malformed Message DoS (CSCee08584)
Cisco IOS OSPF Packet Handling DoS (CSCec16481) Cisco IOS ARP Table Overwrite DoS (CSCdu81936)
Regards,
Bala

Hi,
The Current running IOS version is 12.2(4)T7. I tried through bug toolkit. but i couldn't able to consolidate the IOS to fix these bugs.
Regards,
A.Bala
leolaohoo wrote at Tue Jan 25 02:20:52 GMT+05:30 2011:
>Balakrishnan Appavu,
>
>A new message was posted in the Discussion thread "IOs for cisco 1900 series router":
>
>https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3277195#3277195
>
>Author : leolaohoo
>Profile : https://supportforums.cisco.com/people/leolaohoo
>
>Message:

IPS on 1900 series Router

This should be a simple question.
Customer is thinking about the whole IDS/IPS environment.
He has some 1921 routers.
Am I correct is saying that If the router has the FL-SEC installed, then all they would need is to purchase the CON-SUSA-1921SEC subscription?
And if he has a plain router, then he needs to add the FL-SEC and then the CON-SUSA-1921SEC?
Thanks

Within the Cisco Virtual Switching System, one chassis is designated as the active virtual switch and the other is designated as the standby virtual switch. It should be noted that there is no requirement that the two members of the Cisco Virtual Switching System use the same chassis type. The members consisting of the Cisco Virtual Switching System can be different chassis with varying slot counts. Additionally, note that no Cisco 7600 Series chassis will be supported after the system is converted to Cisco Virtual Switching System mode. The initial release of the Cisco Virtual Switching System supports only one Supervisor Engine 720-10G VSS per chassis. A subsequent software release will allow for redundant supervisors to exist in a single physical chassis within the VSS.

USB console port on 1900 series

I would like to try and use the USB port on the router instead of the RJ45 port. What cable do I need for that? Do I need to configure anything differently on the router?

The cables are the usual USB to USB-Mini which you can buy cheaply at any electronics shop.
You will need to install the driver and the driver can be found HERE.

Which is better for Branch Office Cisco ASA or Cisco 1900 router for Branch Office?

Which is a better solution ?
Using ASA55XX or 1900 series router for WAN and Internet access for 25 - 100 users?

Without knowing more about the environment and what the real requirements are, it is difficult to give a really good answer. If your main concern is effective stateful inspection of traffic entering and leaving the site then the ASA is optimized for that. If you want redundancy (active/active or active/standby) then the ASA is better for this. There are other potential requirements which may make the router the better choice:
- what is the connection to the Internet? If it is Ethernet then either ASA or router will do fine. But if it is something other than Ethernet then you may need the router.
- is there a need for services such as Policy Based Routing? These are available on the router and not on the ASA.
- is there a need for load balancing on outbound traffic? This is available on the router and not on the ASA.
- will there be a need to do routing on the inside network? The range of available options is wider on the router than on the ASA.
- is there a need to run a routing protocol with the Internet provider? The usual choice for this is BGP and that is available on router and not on ASA.
So consider these criteria as you make your choice. Or provide more detail about your environment and what your real requirements are and we may be able to give better advice.
HTH
Rick

Unable to enter to user Privilege EXEC Mode with catalyst 1900

Hello
I am setting up some lab network . I have 10 Cisco 1900 series switches . But when i try to power up it shows the below message. I am not able to get into user privilege mode.
Catalyst 1900 Management Console
Copyright (c) Cisco Systems, Inc. 1993-1997
All rights reserved.
Ethernet address: 00-C0-1D-81-43-65
1 user(s) now active on Management Console.
Enter password:
Catalyst 1900 - Main Menu
     [C] Console Password
     [S] System
     [N] Network Management
     [P] Port Configuration
     [A] Port Addressing
     [D] Port Statistics Detail
     [M] Monitoring
     [V] Virtual LAN
     [R] Multicast Registration
     [F] Firmware
     [I] RS-232 Interface
     [U] Usage Summaries
     [H] Help
     [X] Exit Management Console
Enter Selection:
could you pls tell me how can i get into the user mode such as
Switch1#
Thanks
Navaz

There were two versions of software for the 1900 series switches, one that purely menu based configuration and management and the Enterprise version, which had an option to exit the menu and get access to a CLI. Note though that this is not Cisco IOS.
There's a post, Catalyst 1900 Enterprise software, on the forum from 2002 that will give you some more details. As indicated in that post there's an option to upgrade to the Enterprise edition, but you obviously need to acquire the software.
As per the reponses from Richard and Leo, these are very old switches and depending upon what you're trying to do with them, may not serve your purpose.
Regards

Hi All,pls help in removing banner message from cisco 1900 router

message is: banner exec ^C % Password expiration warning. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device and it provides the default username "cisco" for one-time use. If you have already used the username "cisco" to login to the router and your IOS image supports the "one-time" user option, then this username has already expired. You will not be able to login to the router with this username after you exi this session. It is strongly suggested that you create a new username with a privilege lev of 15 using the following command. username
privilege 15 secret 0
Replace
and
with the username and password you want to Dears,           Recently i purchased new cisco 1900 series router,but unable to remove the banner msg ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C banner login ^C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device. This feature requires the one-time use of the username "cisco" with the password "cisco". These default credentials have a privilege level of 15. YOU MUST USE CISCO CP or the CISCO IOS CLI TO CHANGE THESE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS Here are the Cisco IOS commands. username
privilege 15 secret 0
no username cisco Replace
and
with the username and password you want to use. IF YOU DO NOT CHANGE THE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO LOG INTO THE DEVICE AGAIN AFTER YOU HAVE LOGGED OFF. For more information about Cisco CP please follow the instructions in the QUICK START GUIDE for your router or go to http://www.cisco.com/go/ciscocp ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ^C !

Hi leolahoo,
                Thankx for ur kind help,when i am trying to upload via tftp getting error which below config
             router fe0 connects to symtem via cable. I basically pasted this config into rommon and the image loaded
IP_ADDRESS=192.168.1.99
IP_SUBNET_MASK=255.255.255.0
DEFAULT_GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
TFTP_SERVER=192.168.1.100
TFTP_FILE=c870-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T1.bin
tftpdnld -r
TFTP error 1 received (File not foundÌT¸°).
TFTP: Operation terminated
please note windows firewall is disabled.
check this also may be i am doing mistake while assinging ip address.
I put symtem ip address(on which tftp sever is running)
ip address=192.168.1.100
subnet mask 255.255.255.0
default gateway = 192.1689.1.1
On router fe0 interface ip address=192.168.1.1
but i dont understand where i have to assign ip address 192.168.1.99 as i shown above this command is needed according to syntax.
onemore thing is that when i used below command:
xmodem -c c870-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T1.bin
ios downloading completed but tell me how to save the image to Flash, after xmodem command
when i put the commands
confreg 0x2101
reset
the router comes in rommom mode again.
I dont know which command save image to flash.
I dont have sufficient privilleges to access bekow link http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/routers/ps259/products_tech_note09186a008015bf9e.shtml

1900 working in AP

We currently have serveral Access points connected into a 1900 series switch. My question is that we are seeing a high level of broadcasts/multicasts on the ports that are assoc. with the AP's, is this normal? Also on the 1900 we only have 2 100mb ports that are being used the AP's are pluged into the 10mb ethernet ports that are only half-duplex cap. should we look into buying a 2900?
Thanks in advance,
Jake

I would put a sniffer on the line to see if you've got a device that's arping out of control.

Satellite 1900-305 CD R/W Replacement

I want to replace the Toshiba SD-R2212 CD rewriter with DVD burner (I was thinking of the NEC 6650a). A hunt around the web indicates that this laptop expects the optical drive to be a master on the second IDE channel. Is this correct?
I have also read (from an official Toshiba source) that all Toshiba drives operate as Cable Select as default, which seems inconsistent with the first piece of information. Since I would like to buy a drive which operates "out of the box" can anyone tell me how I can avoid the IDE #1 Error I will get if I don't buy a drive with the right Master/Slave/Cable select setting?

Hello Talon
I have Satellite 1900-703. I have no precise information which drive will fit and works properly but I know just that 1950 series have DVD-R/RW drive. Maybe the same drive will work with 1900 series.
I use DVDs very often and the best solution for me was external drive connected via firewire port. Data transfer speed is very good and on this way I can use the newest and fastest DVD burner (also double layer). Before you search a long time for a right solution I can just recommend you to do the same.
On this way there is no drive that can burn just some formats but you can buy burner that supports all available formats.
Bye

Minimum hardware for VPDN scenario (LAC&LNS)

Hi,
I've need help with hardware platform selection for vpdn scenario. This deployment will serve up to 20 users max. Can anyone say me which is the minimum router platform and IOS version to use for LAC? And for LNS?
Thank you.
Best regards.

Hi Ciscomax,
Thaks for your reply.
Estimated throughput may be up to 100/10Mb. This is the wan access provided by our ISP.
I think that 28xx/29xx routers are more than I need. These platforms are running as LNS for more than 100 users in another site.
I want to know if anyone is using any 800/1900 series router for LNS. And what about the IOS version, will sec/k9 needed?
Best regards.

Connecting 2 3750 Switches in Stack with 2 2960 switches in full Mesh

Hi Friends,
I have attached a pics which DC design of one of our customer , as network engineer i have design this , so i am responsible for implementing it, now request you all to kindly guide me what would be technical problem i have to face in achieving this and how can i over come .Please be in detail. Waiting for your response .
Regards
Amit Kulshrestha

I have attached modified diagram , please suggest.
The major issue I see is that you have not mentioned whether the 2960's are stacked? For the design to work, they need to be stacked because you cannot create port-channels between them and the Core switches unless then 2960's are stacked.
==> You are right , surely 2960 Switch need to be in stack form.
Personally I would look at more powerful switches than the 2960's, something along the lines of the 3750x range or probably now the 3850's.
==> This is constrain of customer, not our responsibility.
The second issue I see is that your servers are connected to the WAN switches. Is there a reason for this? Usually they would be connected to the core switches.
==> For this If 1 separate 2960 series switch can be used ?.
The final point is that you only have single connections from each of your WAN connections which begs the question as to the purpose of having two WAN switches?
==> Customer is having 1900 series of router , only two ports one used for WAN and other used for LAN.
The objective of having two switches is to provide redundancy/resiliency. If you have only one connection from each WAN then why do you need two switches as there is no redundancy?
==> Customer has agreed to have manual change at the time of failure.

1921 15Mbps high speed WAN question and suitability

Hi All,
I'm looking for some advice on router suitability for the following scenario:
I require an inter vlan router to route approx 200 devices consisting of 150x PC's (Physical & Virtual) and 50x IP Phones. There will only be a maximum of 5x VLANs. The router will be primarily used for inter VLAN routing as well as routing to the outside world. Potentially we may add some ACL's for protecting inter VLAN traffic, but that's basically it.
The router will be connected to the outside via ethernet and a Cisco ASA 5505. The ASA will provide NAT/Firewall/QoS and packet shaping functionality. The ASA 5505 is connecting to the outside via cable modem providing 80Mbps down/20Mbps up.
I'd like to understand if the 1921 is suitable for this task specification wise, in addition to confirming the following statement which appears on the datasheet:
'The Cisco 1900 Series enables deployment in high-speed WAN environments with concurrent services enabled up to 15 Mbps.'
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/1900-series-integrated-services-routers-isr/data_sheet_c78-598389.html
I assume the above statement is is only effective when used in conjunction with a HWIC and not relevant in my scenario where connection will be via Ethernet and the ASA5505/Cable modem?
The other reason for querying this is a supplier is trying to push me towards a 2911, due to in their opinion that the 1921 is under spec'd for our requirements?
I'd really like to hear some honest answers on this. I've seeked some advice elsewhere and had some mixed opinions. I'm more than happy to go with a 2911 if it's going to be better suited for our needs, but I really don't see how a 1921 won't be suited for our needs?
TIA
Kevin

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
You might find the attachment of interest.

IP SLA track comaptible router

Hii ,
I have to run IP SLA track commnad and wan run following config command , Which router with lowest cost run the following commands .
please also confirm which Ios can run following comand ,
can i run following configartion on 1900 series router or which lowesr end router can run following comands . iam using for it data as well voice trafic
I tested it on C3750 swicth
Cisco IOS Software, C3750 Software (C3750-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(44)SE
1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Switch          Ports      Model                             SW Version                                           SW Image
*   1            28        WS-C3750G-24TS-1U       12.2(44)SE1                          C3750-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M
config:Samle
For icmp tracking of HOST X.Y.171.1
#ip sla 100
icmp-echo X.Y.171.1
ip sla schedule 100 life forever start-time now
To track profile ( who will track and what to track )
#track 100 rtr 100
“Track 100 “ is tracking profile
where “rtr 100” means situation result in “IP sla 100” has to be monitored
Static routes used
IBS_Nerul_L3_Switch#sh run | i X.Y.170.0
ip route X.Y.170.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel500 track 100 ( primary route in action till Ip is reachable )
ip route X.Y.170.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel501 100        (Secondary route take over once Track object is unreachable )

Hi Nitin,
I dont know about the cheap router but you can use IP sla feature on 1900 series ISR.
IP SLA on ISR G2 platforms like your 1900 require Data K9 licence. Can you paste the output of show version.
IP SLA also works on1841, 2800 and 2900 series routers.
Regards
Hope it helps.

1900 series warranty

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for