2.1 RC1 - Pure performance when Preferences.Worksheet."script path" is used

When I fill out the "Select default path to look for scripts" text box on the Worksheet page in Preferences, I expirience very bad performance when I type in sql statements.
If I clear the text box agian, I have normal performance.

Bug already logged from duplicate posts from other users.
-Turloch

Similar Messages

  • Slow Performance when 800 edits applied....

    I have a close friend that told me today that he's applied 800 edits to a single photo and now it takes about 3 minutes to perform any additional edits. He's using a current model 17" MacBook Pro with 8GB RAM. What can be done to accelerate performance in this situation?
    Thanks,
    Robert

    Stop me if you've heard this one before...
    A man goes to a doctor and says "Doctor, it hurts when I move my arm like this."
    The doctor says: "Then stop moving your arm like that."
    Most of my images just have a small handful of tweaks. I can count them on my fingers. I have had some edits where I wanted to touch up skin (e.g. diminish scars, etc.) and those required quite a few more edits. I can envision needing several dozen edits in some severe cases. But that's about it.
    If the number of edits on a single image can't be expressed as a 1 or 2 digit number, this should be a red flag that there is likely a better approach.
    You have to ask yourself if you really need those 800 edits? ALL of them? REALLY??
    If you share a bit about what sorts of edits your friend is performing, we might suggest an alternate approach which, not only would eliminate the performance problems, it would likely save your friend a LOT of time. Some types of edits are much better handled outside Aperture or by using a plug-in.
    Earlier I mentioned the use of edits to touch up skin (diminish or eliminate scarring, etc..) If someone were to have poor skin that would require extensive editing, there are plug-ins that can create clear-skin with a lot less work (e.g. Portraiture 2 by Imagenomic does this.)
    At this point, we don't have enough information to be able to suggest an alternative, so I just gave one example. Keep in mind that the way Aperture functions -- in order to do non-destructive RAW workflow, Aperture doesn't ever apply an edit to an image directly. It loads the un-altered image, then reads the (very) long list of adjustments and applies them "on the fly" to result in the finished look. 800 "on the fly" edits keeps Aperture very busy. So the performance is COMPLETELY to be expected -- no surprise there. You can "flatten" the edits by telling Aperture to create a new "version" (it'll save a copy of the image with all edits applied.) which will massively improve performance (and set the Aperture preferences to create a stack whenever you create new versions -- it's in the Aperture -> Preferences panel.)
    Even still, 800 is well beyond the norm and I'm thinking there's probably an easier way to achieve the desired effect.

  • InDesign CC 2014 very slow performance when dragging images and changing text

    InDesign CC 2014 very slow performance when dragging images and changing text.
    Running on 2010 Macpro 2.4GHz. 8GB RAM. Any solutions? I've read through many forums on this and tried several fixes.

    Have exact same issue on  my Windows 7 machine. Resetting preferences is a workaround.
    So I start InDesign whilst holding down these keys.
    Ctrl + Alt + Shift (Windows) or Cmd + Ctrl + Opt + Shift (Mac)
    Whilst inDesign is usable again with this fix- I have to do it every time so it trashes all my preferences so NOT GOOD long term fix. Otherwise InDesign freezes and can only be stopped by forcing a quit.
    I have manually deleted the preference files and I have created a brand new admin account - but still no luck - will be onto support tomorrow

  • Bad performance when open a bi publisher report in excel

    We use bi publisher(xml publisher) to create a customized report. For a small report, user like it very much. But for a bigger report, users complain about the performance when they open the file.
    I know it is not a native excel file, that may cause the bad performance. So I ask my user to save it to a new file as a native excel format. The new file still worse than a normal excel file when we open it.
    I did a test. We try to save a bi publish report to excel format, the size shrink to 4Mb. But if we "copy all" and "Paste Special" value only to a new excel file, the size is only 1Mb.
    Do I have any way to improve that, users are complaining everyday. Thanks!
    I did a test today.
    I create a test report
    Test 1: Original file from BIP in EBS is 10Mb. We save it in my local disk, when we open the file, it takes 43 sec.
    Test 2: We save the file in native excel format, the file size is 2.28Mb, it takes 7 sec. to open.
    Test 3: We copy all cell and "PasteSpecial" to a new excel file with value only. The file size is 1.66Mb, it takes only 1 sec to open.
    Edited by: Rex Lin on 2010/3/31 下午 11:26

    EBS or Standalone BIP?
    If EBS see this thread for suggestions on performance tuning and hints and tips:
    EBS BIP Performance Tuning - Definitive Guide?
    Note also that I did end up rewriting my report as PL/SQL producing a csv file and have done with several large reports in BIP on EBS.
    Cheers,
    Dave

  • Help I have a Macbook 2006 model and I like to play videogames on it, well when I leave it plugged in it gets the best performance, when its not plugged in its decent, so will it hurt my battery if I leave it plugged in at all times?

    Help I have a Macbook 2006 model and I like to play videogames on it, well when I leave it plugged in it gets the best performance, when its not plugged in its decent, so will it hurt my battery if I leave it plugged in at all times?

    No, it will hurt your battery, but it is not recommended by Apple. Additionally, since you have a model with a removable battery, you should calibrate the battery once a month if you leave it plugged in at all times.
    Apple Portables: Calibrating your computer's battery for best ...
    www.apple.com/batteries

  • I have the current Mac Pro the entry level with the default specification and i feel some slow performance when applying after effects on my videos using final cut pro and also rendering a video takes long time ? what upgrades do you guys suggest?

    i have the current Mac Pro the entry level with the default configuration   and i feel lack of  performance when applying after effects on my videos using final cut pro and also rendering a video takes long time ? what upgrades do you guys suggest i could do on my Mac Pro ?

    256GB SSD  it shipped with will run low and one of the things to watch.
    Default memory is 12GB  also something to think about.
    D500 and FCP-X 10.1+
    http://macperformanceguide.com/index_topics.html#MacPro2013Performance
    Five models of 2013 Mac Pro running Resolve, FCPX, After Effects, Photoshop, and Aperture

  • Poor performance when accessing a MSAS 2008 cube via BI Server

    I am having an issue with performance when accessing a MSAS 2008 cube via the BI Server.
    I think it has to do with the way that the MDX is being generated.
    Please could someone advise on any settings I could try or any known issues with the integration?
    Thanks,
    Kim Sarkin
    [email protected]

    Hi Kim,
    Sorry I can't help out, but, I'm curious how you got the AS 2008 drivers installed for use with OBIEE? I have an AS2008 environment, but, my OBIEE version only supports 2000 and 2005.
    Thanks,
    Mark

  • Auto-commit occurs even when preference disabled

    In the menu under TOOLS > PREFERENCES > Database Connections, there is an option that says "Autocommit in SQL Worksheet". It seems that sometimes DML statements are committed immediately even if this option is turned off.
    I am experiencing this problem on SQL Developer Version 1.0.0.15.57 running on Windows 2000 (5.00.2195 Service Pack 4). Not sure if it matters, but the database is 10.2.0.1 Enterprise Edition running on LINUX RHAS 3.0 Update 4.
    Is this a known bug? Is it fixed in future releases?
    Thanks,
    Burt

    Auto-commit preference for worksheet, if turned on, would issue commit immediately after you run DML from worksheet.
    If it's turned off and you still see changes data being commit, I think it's possible only in another scenario where you have Auto-commit preference for worksheet turned off, issue DML from worksheet and subsequently do a commit in data grid.
    Commit button is present in both data grid and in sql worksheet, and sql developer uses only one connection/session. So, a commit in grid is going to commit your worksheet issued DMLs.
    Grid data is not commited that way unless you have grid's auto-commit preference on (that preference is in ObjectViewer preference node).
    HTH
    -Raghu

  • Facing low Performance when iterating records of database using cursor

    Hi ,
    i inserted nearly 80,000,000 records into a database, by reading a file whose size is nealry 800MB, in 10 minutes.
    when i am iterating the records using Cursor with Default lock mode , it is taking nearly 1 hour.
    My Bdb details are as follows
    Environment : Non transactional , non locking
    Database : Deferred write.
    Cache : 80% of JVM ( -Xms=1000M -Xmx=1200m )
    Could you please explain why it is taking such a long time ? did i make any mistakes on settings ?
    Thanks
    nvseenu
    Edited by: nvseenu on Jan 15, 2009 5:47 AM

    Hello Gary,
    StoredMap is a convenience API wrapper for a Database. It has the same performance and multi-threading characteristics as a Database. You don't need to synchronize a StoredMap, or use Database to get better performance.
    The lock conflicts are the thing to focus on here. This is unrelated to the topic discussed earlier in this thread.
    How many threads are inserting and how many performing queries?
    What other work, other than inserting and reading, are these threads performing?
    Does any thread keep an iterator (which is a cursor) open?
    How large are the data items in the map?
    What is the resolution of the timestamp? Milliseconds?
    I don't think the exception you posted is complete. Please post the full exception including the cause exception.
    I can't tell from the exception but it looks like multiple insertion threads are conflicting with each other, not with the query threads. If you test only the insertions (no queries), do the lock conflicts still occur?
    One possibility is that multiple insertions threads are using the same timestamp as the key. Only one thread will be able to access that key at a time, the others will wait. Even so, I don't understand why it's taking so long to perform the inserts. But you can easily make the key unique by appending a sequence number -- use a two part key {timestamp, sequence}.
    Please upgrade to JE 3.3 in order to take advantage of the improvements and so we can better support you. We're not actively working with JE 3.2, which is very outdated now.
    --mark                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • "image size could not be verified - operation not performed" when I go to restore to my hard drive. What do?

    I want to restore my disk image using disk utility. I keep getting "image size could not be verified - operation not performed" when I go to restore to my hard drive. What do?
    I would like to partition my disk but it says I have to restore my disk image first so that files can be moved. This is really obnoxiously hard for someone who is only moderately tech savy. Any help is appreciated, but please no links to 3rd party sites. I would like to keep this with the software I already have.
    Thanks ^_^

    Sorry nobody has replied yet, but how was this disk image made?
    "Try Disk Utility
    1. Insert the Mac OS X Install disc, then restart the computer while holding the C key.
    2. When your computer finishes starting up from the disc, choose Disk Utility from the Installer menu at top of the screen. (In Mac OS X 10.4 or later, you must select your language first.)
    *Important: Do not click Continue in the first screen of the Installer. If you do, you must restart from the disc again to access Disk Utility.*
    3. Click the First Aid tab.
    4. Select your Mac OS X volume.
    5. Click Repair Disk, (not Repair Permissions). Disk Utility checks and repairs the disk."
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106214
    Then try a Safe Boot, (holding Shift key down at bootup), run Disk Utility in Applications>Utilities, then highlight your drive, click on Repair Permissions, reboot when it completes.
    (Safe boot may stay on the gray radian for a long time, let it go, it's trying to repair the Hard Drive.)
    If perchance you can't find your install Disc, at least try it from the Safe Boot part onward.

  • How can I improve performance when scopes are open?

    How can I improve performance when scopes are open?
    When Color correcting, performance severely lags, stalls, freezes!
    Nothing to complex...simple 3 way color corrector, occasional curves filters.
    I am constantly waiting for the timeline to update as I move around....sometimes as long as a minute or so.
    I'm on brand new 2.7 Ghz 12-Core MacPro with 64 GB of RAM
    Thanks in advance.
    Jay

    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1369260?tstart=0

  • DOI - I_OI_SPREADSHEET, poor performance when reading more than 9999 record

    Hi,
    Please read this message in the [ABAP Performance and Tuning|DOI - I_OI_SPREADSHEET, poor performance when reading more than 9999 record; section and see if you have any advise.
    Best Regards,
    Marjo

    Hi,
    I met this issue when I tried to write vaule to massive fields of excel range.
    And I solve this issue by using CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES=>CLIPBOARD_EXPORT.
    So, I think you may fix it in the same way.
    1. Select range in by the I_OI_SPREADSHEET
    2. Call method I_OI_DOCUMENT_PROXY->COPY_SELECTION
    3. Call method CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES=>CLIPBOARD_IMPORT
    Cheers,

  • How to improve query performance when reporting on ods object?

    Hi,
    Can anybody give me the answer, how to improve my query performance when reporting on ODS object?
    Thanks in advance,
    Ravi Alakuntla.

    Hi Ravi,
    Check these links which may cater your requirement,
    Re: performance issues of ODS
    Which criteria to follow to pick InfoObj. as secondary index of ODS?
    PDF on BW performance tuning,
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cccad390-0201-0010-5093-fd9ec8157802
    Regards,
    Mani.

  • ZBook 17 g2 - poor DPC Latency performance when running from z Turbo Drive PCIe SSD

    I'm setting up a new zBook 17 g2 and am getting very poor DPC latency performance (> 6000 us) when running from the PCIe SSD. I've re-installed the OS (Win 7 64 bit) on both the PCIe SSD and a SATA HDD and the DPC latency performance is fine when running from the HDD (50 - 100 us) but horrible when running from the PCIe SSD (> 6000 us).  I've updated the BIOS and tried every combination of driver and component enabling/disabling I can think of.  The DPC latency is extremely high from the initial Windows install with no drivers installed.  Adding drivers seems to have no effect on the DPC latency. Before purchasing the laptop I found this review: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-HP-ZBook-17-E9X11AA-ABA-Workstation.106222.0.html where the DPC latency measurement (middle of the page) looks OK.  Of course, this is the prior version of the laptop and I believe it does not have the PCIe SSD.  Combining that with the fact that I get fine performance when running from the HDD I am led to believe that the PCIe SSD is the cause of the problem. Has anyone found a solution to this problem?  As it stands right now my zBook is not usable for digital audio work when running from the PCIe SSD.  But it cost me a lot of money so I'd sure like to use it...! Thanks, rgames

    Hi mooktank, No solution yet but, as of about six weeks ago, HP at least acknowledged that it's a problem (finally).  I reproduced it perfectly on another zBook 17 g2 and another PCIe SSD in the same laptop and HP was able to reproduce the problem as well.  So the problem is clearly in the BIOS or with some driver related to the PCIe SSD.  It could also be with the firmware in the drive, itself, but I can't find any other PCIe drives in the 60 mm form factor.  So there's no way to see if a differnt type of drive would fix the problem. My suspicion is that it's related to the PCIe sleep states - those are known to cause exactly these types of problems because the drive takes quick "naps" to save power and there's a delay when it is told to wake back up.  That delay causes a delay in the audio buffer that results in pops/crackles/stutters that would never be noticed doing other tasks like video editing or CAD work .  So it's a problem specific to folks who need low-latency audio performance (very few apps require low latency audio - video editing, for example, uses huge buffers with relatively high latency).  A lot of desktops offer a BIOS option to disable those sleep states but no such option exists in HP's BIOS for that laptop.  In theory you can do it from within Windows but it doesn't have an effect on my system.  That might be one of those options that Windows allows you to change but that actually has no effect. One workaround is to disable CPU throttling.  That makes the CPU run at full speed all the time and, I believe, also disables the PCIe and other sleep states.  When I disable CPU throttling, DPC latency goes back to normal.  However, the CPU is then running full-speed all the time so your battery life basically goes to nothing and the laptop gets *very* hot. Clearly that is not necessary because the laptop runs fine from the SATA SSD.  HP needs to fix the latency problem associated with the PCIe drive. The next logical step is to provide a BIOS update that provides a way to disable the PCIe sleep states without disabling CPU throttling, like on many desktop systems.  The bad news is that HP tech support is not very technical, so it takes forever for them to figure out what I'm talking about.  It took a couple months for them to start using the DPC Latency checker. Hopefully there will be a fix at some point... in the meantime, I hope that HP sends me a check for spending so much time educating their techs on how computers work.  And for countless hours lost re-installing different OSes only to show that the performance is exactly the same as shown in the DPC Latency checker. rgames

  • Poor performance when using kde desktop effect

    Hey,
    I'm having trouble when using kde effet (system settings -> desktop -> desktop effects).
    I have a dual core E5200 3 ghz, 2 GB memory pc8500 and an HD4850 using fglrx driver, but I got incredible bad performance when using desktop effect and watching video, I can barely watch a 800x600 video in full screen mode without having bad performance, X getting up to 40% cpu usage.
    Its really like my graphic card isnt handling the rendering stuff but 3D acceleration is working, I can play 3D game without problem so far (as long as the deskstop effect arent enabled cause the cpu have like a hard time handling both for recent game)
    So I guess its some trouble with 2D acceleration or something like that, I read that some people had such issue, but I didnt figure a way to fix it.
    Here is my xorg.conf, in case something is wrong with it :
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "X.org Configured"
    Screen 0 "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0" 0 0
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
    Load "dri2"
    Load "extmod"
    Load "dbe"
    Load "record"
    Load "glx"
    Load "dri"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Keyboard0"
    Driver "kbd"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "Monitor Vendor"
    ModelName "Monitor Model"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
    Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
    Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
    Option "DPMS" "true"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    ### Available Driver options are:-
    ### Values: <i>: integer, <f>: float, <bool>: "True"/"False",
    ### <string>: "String", <freq>: "<f> Hz/kHz/MHz"
    ### [arg]: arg optional
    #Option "ShadowFB" # [<bool>]
    #Option "DefaultRefresh" # [<bool>]
    #Option "ModeSetClearScreen" # [<bool>]
    Identifier "Card0"
    Driver "vesa"
    VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc"
    BoardName "RV770 [Radeon HD 4850]"
    BusID "PCI:8:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
    Driver "fglrx"
    BusID "PCI:8:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen0"
    Device "Card0"
    Monitor "Monitor0"
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 1
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 4
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 8
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 15
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 16
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "aticonfig-Screen[0]-0"
    Device "aticonfig-Device[0]-0"
    Monitor "aticonfig-Monitor[0]-0"
    DefaultDepth 24
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Thank you for any help.

    Section "Device"
    ### Available Driver options are:-
    ### Values: <i>: integer, <f>: float, <bool>: "True"/"False",
    ### <string>: "String", <freq>: "<f> Hz/kHz/MHz"
    ### [arg]: arg optional
    #Option "ShadowFB" # [<bool>]
    #Option "DefaultRefresh" # [<bool>]
    #Option "ModeSetClearScreen" # [<bool>]
    Identifier "Card0"
    Driver "vesa"
    VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc"
    BoardName "RV770 [Radeon HD 4850]"
    BusID "PCI:8:0:0"
    EndSection
    and
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "Monitor Vendor"
    ModelName "Monitor Model"
    EndSection
    I see no reason for those to be there.
    make a backup of your xorg.conf and remove / comment those lines.

Maybe you are looking for