2.4GHz or 2.5GHz MacBook Pro?

Is the extra couple hundred dollars worth the extra 100MHz?

wjosten wrote:
Ah:
BS ALERT
The 2.5G is an older model, current production is the 2.2 and the 2.4, Shootist is quite correct.
Did you not post that? That is flat wrong.
Well it can be or it may not be. The early 2011 13" came with an i5 2.5. the late model came with an i5 2.4.
But as you posted I think the OP is talking about the custom choices for the 2.4 15" and 17" late 2011 models. Which you can upgrade to the 2.5. Big deal.

Similar Messages

13'' 2.5GHz MacBook Pro (non Retina) - Still worth getting?

I'm looking into getting a new Mac.
My thinking at the moment is that the SuperDrive will be much more useful to me than the Retina Display, so I was thinking of getting the older 13'' 2.5GHz MacBook Pro. But I hear this model is being phased out; would I be stupid to get this now instead of one of the newer models?
What other sorts of things should I be thinking about?
Thanks for all replies.

Little Endian,
it depends on what you need to do with a new Mac. My “new” Mac (bought last year) was a used Mid 2010 model; it suffices for my needs. If you require the higher resolution built-in display, then the non-Retina model can’t compete. I’m not sure which model has the longer battery duration per charge. Physically, the non-Retina models have socketed RAM, so their RAM is user-replaceable; the Retina models have soldered RAM, so their RAM isn’t user-replaceable. The non-Retina models take industry standard 2.5-inch form factor, 9.5-mm high SATA drives; the older Retina models take Mini-SATA SSDs, and the current Retina models take PCIe SSDs, both of which have far fewer choices available if an upgrade is desired. The non-Retina models have Ethernet and FireWire 800 ports; the Retina models require Thunderbolt adapters if either of these is needed. As you’d noted, the non-Retinas model have a SuperDrive; the Retina models would need an external drive. The non-Retina models have a Kensington lock slot; the Retina models don’t. If out-of-warranty repair would be an issue for you, the non-Retina models are easier to repair than the Retina models.

2.4GHz vs 2.7GHz MacBook Pro Retina?

What is the performance difference? The 2.4 only comes with 256GB of flash memory and the 2.7 doubles it and the RAM too. It's about £420 difference. I was thinking if I get the 2.4 I could buy an external SSD if I run out which I'm sure I will..

The difference is speed. The 2.7 runs at a higher clockspeed and is therefor faster. The processor is not upgradable though,so you have to choose wisley when you purchase your Mac.

Today I found a gaping hole and bend on the sueprdrive of my MacBook Pro.

I open up my macbook pro neoprene sleeve today to reveal a bulge on the superdrive corner. There was no disc in the drive for weeks. The aluminum is actually bending outwards. There is a huge gap on the side where the aluminum meets with the grey plastic bezel.The lid is not flush with the system when closed now it has a gap and is uneven with the undamaged side. I can see the side inside of the laptop slightly:complicated plastic groves and such. I cant fathom how this could happen. I have no camera for pictures. I am still in warranty what are my options? The optical drive accepts and ejects discs but its difficult and seems like it will fail at anytime now because of the pressure of the drive casing. I read that this could be from daily wrist pressure. Also I sometimes hold the laptop and walk around with it holding that corner, that probably contributed to this. I have researched and found this to be the most venerable part of the macbook pro. If apple will not repair this, how much does this affect resale value? This is a multitouch 2.5GHZ macbook pro ( like the last non unibody they made) Now I see the purpose of the unibody. They moved the optical drive to the side and made the chasis much stronger. This is my only computer, which I need daily for online college so needless to say im pretty upset about this. This laptop has been so well taken care of its not even funny. No scratches except one near the bottom battery area. Never dropped also put in a sleeve then a briefcase. Note the below are close examples to what my issue is (but not my pics).
Lid gap looks like this:
http://www.notquiteleet.com/mbp4.JPG
The bezel gap looks like this but mine is only 1/4 as long and not as open (i closed the gap as much as I could it looks a lot better now then it did original but its a temp fix and still bad imo):
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/1176/img0042x.jpg
Message was edited by: pallotta2
Message was edited by: pallotta2
Message was edited by: pallotta2
Message was edited by: pallotta2
Message was edited by: pallotta2

Yes I have apple care for a few more months. If apple fixes this I will totally renew the warranty as well. Never thought something like this could happen. I wont be able to go to the apple store for another 3 days (traveling).

My new MacBook Pro thinks it's an iBook G4.

Okay, so, this is weird.
I'd been using a 14" 1GHz iBook G4 for about four years, and just recently upgraded to a 15" 2.5GHz MacBook Pro. When I got it, I used the Migration Assistant (during the initial setup) to transfer all my files. I connected both computers via FireWire.
Since then, my computer thinks it's an iBook G4. For instance, the "Computer Name" screensaver says "[my name]'s iBook G4." At the OS X user login screen, it says "[my name]'s iBook G4." My phone reads the paired Bluetooth Device as "[my name]'s iBook G4." You get the idea.
It's not really a big deal, and it's in no way affecting functionality, but if there's an easy fix, I'd like to do it.
I'm using the 15" 2.5GHz MacBook Pro model with 2GB RAM and 512MB vRAM. I don't know if this has any effect, but I'm using Boot Camp to dual boot Windows Vista Ultimate OEM, and the disk is partitioned half Mac/half Windows.
Thanks all!
Ninja edit - I reset the PRAM the other day to fix an unrelated problem, and this problem still persists.

Hi There
In System Preferences select the sharing pane and at the top of this window you will see that you can change the name of the computer. When you transferred over everything it obviously transferred over the Computer Name as well.
Hope this helps
J.C

Which version macbook pro is this? and how much ram?

Hi Everybody!
I just bought this 2.4ghz core 2 duo macbook pro 2nd hand:-)
It's probably the mid 2007 version. It's annonced with a max RAM upgrade of 3 gb, but it's to cheap to buy 4gb (2x2)!!
How does it work? Does OSX used the last gig of ram from 3-4gb? or it is just a waste of money?
I use my macbook pro for normal use, and production in logic pro.
Thanks!
Kasper

Yes, it's the Santa Rosa chipset. And yes, you have an LED backlit display and the faster frontside bus (that will read 800 MHz in System Profiler).
The MBP chipsets are:
• Core Duo - clock speeds of 1.83, 2.0 or 2.16 GHz
• Core 2 Duo - clock speeds of 2.16 or 2.33 GHz (2.0 GHz C2D chips are only in MBs, not MBPs)
• Core 2 Duo "Santa Rosa" - clock speeds of 2.2, 2.4 or 2.6 GHz, with a 4 MB L2 cache
• Core 2 Duo "Penryn" - clock speeds of 2.4, 2.5 or 2.6 GHz, with 3 or 6 MB L2 cache
+Feel free to tune out for this part, the info you need is above.+
I'm using the terms "Santa Rosa" and "Penryn" as they are commonly used on these boards. "Santa Rosa" actually refers to a combination of the Merom-refresh CPU chip with other chips for graphics/wireless (i.e. it's a platform, not a chip, and thus was technically never in an MBP because only the Merom-refresh chip was used, not the whole platform - but the original C2Ds were Merom-based, and "Santa Rosa" sounds better than "Merom-refresh", I suppose). Merom chips (like the Yonah Core Duo chip) were made with the 65 nm process, whereas Penryn is the successor to Merom and is made with the newer 45 nm process.

MacBook pro 330m freezing randomly during 3d intensive games

I have a 2010 2.4ghz 15" Core i5 MacBook pro with the high res screen. Recently I noticed that the MBP may randomly freeze when 3D games are run under bootcamp. By random I mean ranging from 30 min to 2 hours into the game. The screen would distort into vertical lines and a buzzing/static noise could be heard coming from the speakers. However, I've also noticed that while the keyboard and mouse seem unresponsive, Skype calls would sometimes still be audible and connected despite the rest of the system freezing. I have yet to experience this in OS X as I rarely play any 3d game in OS X. I have updated both the OSX and Windows drivers to the latest version. The problem is persistent and happened in star craft 2 and red alert 3. What seems to be causing this?

Timothy I'd recommend reposting in the Boot Camp forum as that seems to be where the issue is occurring.
It also seems like you might be having issues with Skype too, are you using that in Windows or OS X? Again if the issue is occurring in Windows the Boot Camp forum is probably where you want to start or even in forums that are specific to Skype.
Boot Camp's forum is locate at: http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=237
Roger

Macbook Pro recently started lagging

I got my Macbook Pro 15" i7 in Sept 2010 and its been fine until this past week when all of a sudden I noticed that while scrolling through webpages and applications the graphics were not smooth as they use to be and would scroll in chopped segments instead of a constant flow. Also, when I use spacebar to preview items, the animation of the preview expanding is choppy and not smooth. As of now, my mac seems like its getting worse; it lags when I have a few applications running and sometimes the trackpad takes a while to respond.
I tried scanning the mac for any viruses, found that there was malware and removed it but the problems still existed. I repaired my hard disk after realizing that it was damaged, reinstalled Lion and still there are lag issues.
Any ideas what else could possibly cause this problem?

My mid-2010 2.4ghz core 2 duo MacBook Pro with Lion installed started to have similiar issues. It slows down and lags to the point where it takes a couple minutes to catch up. I build websites so have an FTP, Dreamweaver, and Photoshop all open ,and thats when it usually starts the lag. Im outside of my warranty so I'm not able to get any hellp. Wish I could find a fix.

MacBook Pro 4,1 8GB Ram Snow Leopard

Hello, i have a 15" 2.5GHz MacBook Pro Penryn Early 2008.
It has snow leopard 10.6.6 64-bit installed on it. Currently i am running it with 3GB DDR2 667mhz ram.
I am curious, can i upgrade it to 8GB of DDR2 800MHz ram? Will it be accessible/useable? Wikipedia says i can only upgrade to 6GB, but i think thats due to 10.5, 10.6 being x64 i would assume it should be able to address 8GB of memory. Thanks!

Hmm, well even if i go with 6GB ram, i would still rather go with 800MHz being that the systembus is 800MHz. i have 4GB 800Mhz in my White MacBook tied with a hybrid solid state hard drive. thing is fast as ****. kinda upsetting that my macbook is faster than my pro.
i can deal with 6GB, i mean 8 is kinda overkill but if i was able to do it, why the **** not lol.
i have 3GB 667mhz and a 5200rpm hard drive in my pro, i can definitely see it choking some times, the ram wont make much of a difference but i know for a fact the hard drive will.

8gb RAM upgrade for 2012 13" MacBook Pro?

I have a 2012 13" i5 2.5GHz MacBook Pro with 4GB of RAM running Yosemite. I'm considering upgrading to 8GB and was wanting to ask how much difference will it make to my computer's performance. The apps I use most are safari, iPhoto for RAW photo editing, iTunes, Xcode, Mail, Calendar and Pages. I'm also going to be using GarageBand soon. I would like to be able to use several of these programs at the same time. Would you say it is worth the upgrade?

About OS X Memory Management and Usage
Using Activity Monitor to read System Memory & determine how much RAM is used
OS X Mavericks- About Activity Monitor
Adding RAM only makes it possible to run more programs concurrently. It doesn't speed up the computer nor make games run faster. What it can do is prevent the system from having to use disk-based VM when it runs out of RAM because you are trying to run too many applications concurrently or using applications that are extremely RAM dependent. It will improve the performance of applications that run mostly in RAM or when loading programs.

Buying a new Macbook Pro. Deciding b/w this add on: 2.4GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7 vs. 2.5GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7? Is it worth the extra $250?

Buying a new Macbook Pro. Deciding b/w this add on:
2.4GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7 vs.
2.5GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7?
Is it worth the extra $250?
What's the big difference? Thanks.

Upgrade RAM yourself through macsales.com for $60. Use the remaining $140 of Apple's mmeory price and upgrade for $150 to hi-res (1680x1050) and anti-glare. I never regretted that upgrade on mine.
My humble opinion.
Sorry ... I just did the math and that puts you $10 out of pocket ...

Boot up time of MacBook Pro 13" 2.5GHz i5 vs MacBook Pro 13" with Retina display with 2.4GHz i5

Hello
Does anyone know
"the boot up time of MacBook Pro 13" 2.5GHz i5 vs MacBook Pro 13" with Retina display with 2.4GHz i5?"
Thanks

A bit simplifying :
there are two parts in boot process - one-before spinning thing, other - spinning thing to desktop.
First part is hardware inits, you can not speed it up. It is for sure longer for your MBP than for her - its normal, more hardware and it is more sophisticated so longer init.
Second part depends on HD (SSD) speed.
Say so - I have M4 SSD and second part is 1 to 2 spins until login window. Should be more or less same for you.
If it is not so - probably something is not good with filesystem and some config files, most probably due to cloning instead of install. Reboot from recovery, repair drive (first - drive as a whole, second - boot partition), then reboot permissions. reboot two times as normal. see what'll happen with timing.

For Video/Audio: Macbook Pro (2009-17" 2.66Ghz i7) vs. Macbook Pro (Current 2011-15" 2.4Ghz i7))

So I currently have a MacbookPro 6,1 - I believe a late 2009 model, 17" 2.66Ghz i7 Dual-Core Processor, 8gb Ram (updated), NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M. I started doing video and even noticed this when I normally do my audio work - that my video doesn't look like it should (noticed when a client looked at my computer screen and noticed that colors, brightness was off and extra grainy as compared to other computers he has seen his work on. I also noticed I sometimes get a lag when playing video causing me to have sync issues (off by a couple frames or so -- which completely ***** when I'm trying to do my job right).
So I found a sweet deal on the newer Macbook Pros. Seller told me it retails for around $2400 so I'm assuming it's the Quad-Core 2.4Ghz 15" with some minor upgrades. Let's just say it's this particular model - am I better off selling my older model for this one? I would just hate to part with my 17" although it would help take off some travel weight.
I'm not good with specs which is why I'm here, but apple store says it has:
Intel HD Graphics 3000
AMD Radeon HD 6770M with 1GB GDDR5
And I think that might help solve my problems, on top of the Quad-Core addition which I believe my current macbook6,1 doesn't have right?
Thanks!

thebigother wrote:
Thanks. At this point, portability isn't that important which is why I'm thinking of the upgrade. How do you figure that the iMac is better. The specs on my MBP are still superior with the i7 at 2.5GHz vs the iMacs i5 at 3.5GHz.... hm.. isn't the i7 faster than the i5?
Not in this case. The iMac has a "Haswell' CPU whereas the MBP has a 'Sandy Bridge' CPU, two different generations of processors. To graphically illustrate the performance differences between the two options look at the respective machines in this link:
https://browser.primatelabs.com/mac-benchmarks
Note that the iMac registers a score of 3893 vs the MBP score of 2700. In real world terms, differences of a couple of hundred points often is inconsequential, but here we are dealing with a very significant difference of over a thousand points.
If portability is not a requirement and the bank account is fat, the iMac is by far the better choice. A larger and better display combined with much superior CPU and GPU.
Ciao.

New Macbook Pro reluctant to connect to Airport Extreme at 5ghz

I brought the latest 17" 2011 Macbook Pro back in April this year, to replace an older 15" MBP. I'm mostly happy with the new machine, but have noticed one frustrating problem.
When waking from sleep, and perhaps even from booting cold, the Macbook Pro always connects to my Airport Extreme at the slower 2.4ghz speed. My old Macbook Pro was always keen to jump onto the same network at 5ghz unless it was too far away to get a good quality signal. I still have the old MBP and it still behaves this way, correctly. The new Macbook Pro is meant to have more ariels in it for wifi (albiet unlikely to be present in my year or two old Airport Extreme) but I would expect it to behave at least as well as its older sibling.
The thing is if I disable Airport and re-enable it will then mostly lock on at 5ghz, its just frustrating having to do so. It's not even helped by locality, I'm currently in the same room 1m away from the Airport Extreme and it still wakes up onto 2.4ghz.
I've yet to upgrade to Lion, so am running on Snow Leopard. I've heard friends have niggling problems with Wifi waking from sleep anyways, so I look forward to seeing how this problem alters when i do upgrade.
Any suggestions, or anyone else experiencing the same behaviour? Thanks
Cheers
Jim

Delete the connection information for the 2.4 GHz connection and it won't be able to connect at 2.4 GHz.

E8350 5GHZ Band and Macbook Pro

I saw another thread like this but really this should be brought to Linksys attention. The 5GHZ band is extremely slow with my Macbook Pro Retina (2012). It takes around 30 seconds to load any webpage if it loads at all. No other device has a problem and my macbook works with every other router at 5GHZ. The 2.4GHZ works fine. The strange thing is, the problem even happens when going straight to the router to make changes in the menu, not even outside the local network. It will take 30+ seconds to load any page in the router settings (sometimes it doesn't load at all). Oddly enough, it will load the login page instantly, anything other than that takes forever. The wifi networks aren't overlapping channels with each other, or my neighbors either. Any help would be appreciated.

ping www.yahoo.com: 64 bytes from 206.190.36.45: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=51.218 ms64 bytes from 206.190.36.45: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=52.501 ms64 bytes from 206.190.36.45: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=54.525 ms64 bytes from 206.190.36.45: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=53.394 ms64 bytes from 206.190.36.45: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=54.045 ms ping 192.168.1.1: 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=5.090 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=5.049 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=5.051 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=5.037 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.599 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=403.588 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=5.093 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=2.620 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=2.573 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=4.886 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=4.870 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=66.202 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=5.349 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=5.136 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=5.199 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=2.441 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=5.079 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=4.876 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=2.521 ms64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=176.117 ms traceroute www.yahoo.com: (5GHZ) -traceroute: Warning: www.yahoo.com has multiple addresses; using 206.190.36.105-traceroute to fd-fp3.wg1.b.yahoo.com (206.190.36.105), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 5.144 ms 5.073 ms 2.451 ms 2 * * * 3 host-69-144-234-41.but-mt.client.bresnan.net (69.144.234.41) 13.573 ms 12.240 ms 8.995 ms 4 mslmt001dr5-xe-5-2-0-u0.int.bresnan.net (69.145.247.150) 14.613 ms 14.926 ms 27.741 ms 5 69.144.26.2 (69.144.26.2) 29.179 ms 30.772 ms 48.891 ms 6 lvtmt001cm1-ge-0-2.int.bresnan.net (72.175.110.76) 32.170 ms 29.580 ms 26.752 ms 7 38.104.126.53 (38.104.126.53) 34.154 ms 38.88.252.73 (38.88.252.73) 32.550 ms 38.104.126.53 (38.104.126.53) 33.458 ms 8 be2084.ccr22.sea01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.253) 33.531 ms 30.101 ms be2083.ccr21.sea01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.249) 29.549 ms 9 be2077.ccr22.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.241) 49.943 ms be2075.ccr21.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.233) 50.691 ms 50.415 ms10 be2016.ccr21.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.178) 51.753 ms be2015.ccr21.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.7.174) 49.873 ms 51.046 ms11 te0-0-2-0.agr11.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.98) 52.002 ms te0-0-2-0.agr12.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.62) 49.915 ms 50.915 ms12 yahoo.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.13.190) 58.853 ms 50.280 ms 154.54.14.58 (154.54.14.58) 56.712 ms13 ae-0.pat1.swp.yahoo.com (216.115.110.43) 49.315 ms 50.048 ms 47.520 ms14 216.115.101.109 (216.115.101.109) 52.928 ms 216.115.101.111 (216.115.101.111) 55.749 ms ae-5.pat2.gqb.yahoo.com (216.115.101.197) 56.669 ms15 66.196.67.1 (66.196.67.1) 53.154 ms 66.196.67.5 (66.196.67.5) 56.971 ms 66.196.67.3 (66.196.67.3) 55.908 ms16 98.137.31.133 (98.137.31.133) 55.514 ms unknown-67-195-1-x.yahoo.com (67.195.1.181) 57.360 ms 98.137.31.141 (98.137.31.141) 52.294 ms17 et-17-25.fab3-1-gdc.gq1.yahoo.com (67.195.1.83) 54.626 ms et-18-1.fab3-1-gdc.gq1.yahoo.com (67.195.1.81) 54.123 ms 98.137.31.186 (98.137.31.186) 54.904 ms18 po-11.bas1-7-prd.gq1.yahoo.com (206.190.32.17) 53.385 ms po-10.bas1-7-prd.gq1.yahoo.com (206.190.32.15) 55.489 ms 206.190.32.13 (206.190.32.13) 55.354 ms19 * * *20 * * * This whole process took about 5 minutes to complete. traceroute www.yahoo.com: (2.4GHZ) -traceroute: Warning: www.yahoo.com has multiple addresses; using 206.190.36.45-traceroute to fd-fp3.wg1.b.yahoo.com (206.190.36.45), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 3.379 ms 1.040 ms 0.776 ms 2 * * * 3 host-69-144-234-41.but-mt.client.bresnan.net (69.144.234.41) 12.484 ms 20.470 ms 7.765 ms 4 mslmt001dr5-xe-5-2-0-u0.int.bresnan.net (69.145.247.150) 17.085 ms 18.684 ms 41.053 ms 5 seawafh2cr5-xe-3-3-0-u0.int.bresnan.net (69.144.26.2) 26.609 ms 26.746 ms 24.828 ms 6 lvtmt001cm1-ge-0-2.int.bresnan.net (72.175.110.76) 44.030 ms 28.533 ms 26.841 ms 7 te0-0-0-16.ccr21.sea02.atlas.cogentco.com (38.104.126.53) 28.844 ms 39.352 ms 38.88.252.73 (38.88.252.73) 28.130 ms 8 be2084.ccr22.sea01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.253) 31.601 ms be2083.ccr21.sea01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.249) 29.245 ms be2084.ccr22.sea01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.253) 31.962 ms 9 be2077.ccr22.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.241) 47.697 ms be2075.ccr21.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.233) 48.365 ms be2077.ccr22.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.241) 47.435 ms10 be2015.ccr21.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.7.174) 48.275 ms 50.377 ms 49.250 ms11 te0-0-2-0.agr11.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.0.98) 48.403 ms 49.199 ms 50.759 ms12 yahoo.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.14.58) 49.978 ms 47.774 ms yahoo.sjc04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.14.62) 47.646 ms13 ae-6.pat2.swp.yahoo.com (216.115.100.91) 50.326 ms 47.864 ms 50.907 ms14 ae-7.pat2.gqb.yahoo.com (216.115.101.109) 52.846 ms ae-7.pat1.gqb.yahoo.com (216.115.96.45) 69.071 ms ae-7.pat2.gqb.yahoo.com (216.115.101.109) 53.439 ms15 ae-1.msr2.gq1.yahoo.com (66.196.67.3) 54.056 ms 54.956 ms ae-1.msr1.gq1.yahoo.com (66.196.67.5) 75.433 ms16 xe-1-0-1.clr2-a-gdc.gq1.yahoo.com (98.137.31.133) 53.272 ms unknown-67-195-1-x.yahoo.com (67.195.1.185) 52.265 ms unknown-67-195-1-x.yahoo.com (67.195.1.181) 54.880 ms17 et-17-1.fab3-1-gdc.gq1.yahoo.com (98.137.31.172) 51.487 ms et-18-1.fab7-1-gdc.gq1.yahoo.com (67.195.1.245) 51.412 ms et-17-25.fab4-1-gdc.gq1.yahoo.com (67.195.1.87) 53.990 ms18 po-11.bas1-7-prd.gq1.yahoo.com (206.190.32.17) 71.616 ms po-9.bas1-7-prd.gq1.yahoo.com (206.190.32.13) 64.514 ms po-11.bas2-7-prd.gq1.yahoo.com (206.190.32.33) 50.988 ms19 * * *20 * * * This process took about 10 seconds to complete. netstat -rn: Routing tables Internet:Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expiredefault 192.168.1.1 UGSc 67 67 en0127 127.0.0.1 UCS 0 0 lo0127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 26 lo0169.254 link#4 UCS 0 0 en0192.168.1 link#4 UCS 2 0 en0192.168.1.1/32 link#4 UCS 2 0 en0192.168.1.1 b4:75:e:c1:63:2b UHLWIir 69 143 en0 978192.168.1.122/32 link#4 UCS 0 0 en0192.168.1.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWbI 0 2 en0 Internet6:Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire::1 ::1 UHL lo0fd02:1a5b:2826::/64 link#4 UC en0fd02:1a5b:2826::167:d734:ee1b:422b c8:e0:eb:19:88:87 UHL lo0fd02:1a5b:2826::cae0:ebff:fe19:8887 c8:e0:eb:19:88:87 UHL lo0fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 UcI lo0fe80::1%lo0 link#1 UHLI lo0fe80::%en0/64 link#4 UCI en0fe80::b675:eff:fec1:632b%en0 b4:75:e:c1:63:2b UHLWIi en0fe80::cae0:ebff:fe19:8887%en0 c8:e0:eb:19:88:87 UHLI lo0fe80::%awdl0/64 link#8 UCI awdl0fe80::5c7b:65ff:fe51:6bf4%awdl0 5e:7b:65:51:6b:f4 UHLI lo0ff01::%lo0/32 ::1 UmCI lo0ff01::%en0/32 link#4 UmCI en0ff01::%awdl0/32 link#8 UmCI awdl0ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UmCI lo0ff02::%en0/32 link#4 UmCI en0ff02::%awdl0/32 link#8 UmCI awdl0 [Process completed] I can make a video showing the differenence. It doesn't seem to show here but it happens...

2.4GHz or 2.5GHz MacBook Pro?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for