2 AIM Bugs (crlf & message order)

Phone: Curve 8300
OS: 4.5.0.52 (Platform 2.7.0.66)
AIM: 2.1.37
I've noticed 2 bugs in the AIM software.
The client does not support multi-line messages. So single messages like the following...
line 1
line 2
line 3
appear as...
line 1line 2line 3
Also, messages received by the client at the same time often display out of order.
These two bugs have been giving me problems when communicating with AIM bots. I haven't seen these bugs in the other AIM clients for the bb.
For now I have switched to using instango as an alternative, but I would prefer to use the RIM software whenever possible.

Hi,
The AIM is in the 2821 router running 12.4 AES T train IOS.
CUE will allow me to installed the zero ivr port package but not the 2 or 4 port.
CUE config :
se-10-2-1-2# show software packages
Installed Packages:
- Installer (Installer application) (7.0.2.0)
- Thirdparty (Service Engine Thirdparty Code) (7.0.2)
- Bootloader (Primary) (Service Engine Bootloader) (2.1.14)
- Infrastructure (Service Engine Infrastructure) (7.0.2)
- Global (Global manifest) (7.0.2)
- Service Engine license (License for the Service Engine) (2.1.2.0)
- Auto Attendant (Service Engine Telephony Infrastructure) (7.0.2)
- Voice Mail (Voicemail application) (7.0.2)
- Bootloader (Secondary) (Service Engine Bootloader) (2.1.14.0)
- Core (Service Engine OS Core) (7.0.2)
- GPL Infrastructure (Service Engine GPL Infrastructure) (7.0.2)
Installed Plug-ins:
- CUE Voicemail Language Support (Languages global pack) (7.0.2)
- CUE Voicemail US English (English language pack) (7.0.2)
se-10-2-1-2# show software licenses
Installed license files:
- voicemail_lic.sig : 25 MAILBOX LICENSE
Core:
- Application mode: CCM
- Total usable system ports: 6
Voicemail/Auto Attendant:
- Max system mailbox capacity time: 840
- Default # of general delivery mailboxes: 10
- Default # of personal mailboxes: 25
- Max # of configurable mailboxes: 35
Interactive Voice Response:
- Max # of IVR sessions: Not Available
Languages:
- Max installed languages: 2
- Max enabled languages: 2

Similar Messages

Message order in Papyrus sequence diagram xmi file

Dear all,
I would like to ask you if you could help me by explaining me how message ordering information of Papyrus sequence diagrams is represented in the corresponding xmi files.
For each lifeline, I would assume that the order of messages is shown in the xmi file in the coveredBy attribute of the respective lifeline element.
If yes, I have observed that the order there is not shown correctly. Adding a message seems to be always appended at the end of the messages list, instead of being inserted inbetween its neighbouring messages.
If no, then how can I get from the xmi file the message order for a single lifeline?
I am using just two simple lifelines exchanging messages, without any combined fragments or complex notation. My Eclipse version is Luna, and I just downloaded the Papyrus 1.1.0 version, the one that Mars uses.
Thank you a lot in advance. Any information you could provide me regarding this issue would be extremely useful.
Best regards,
Alkis

Since I haven't still got any answer, let me rephrase the question and make it more general:
Do Papyrus sequence diagrams store message order information?
As far as I have understood, they should, but I believe that it is a Papyrus bug that, when creating a new message, order of MessageOccurrenceSpecification fragments in XMI file is most frequently not respected. The same can be seen from the MessageOccurrenceSpecification fragments in the Model Explorer for the respective interaction in Papyrus IDE, order of them frequently seems random.
Another thing which I strongly believe is a bug is that, when creating a new combined fragment sometimes the lifeline information of message events in the XMI file gets lost (attribute 'coveredBy' of each lifeline, and attribute 'covered' of each MessageOccurenceSpecification fragment get blank).
In any case, I would be really grateful if someone could answer my initial question so that I know that these assumptions are correct, find a way to temporarily circumvent the problem and file a bug report about that.
Best regards,
Alkis

Online / offline, read/ unread status, message order

Kind of exhausting dealing with the UTTER JUNK skype software on a daily basis. As I sit now with my Mac and iPhone Skype in front of me, talking to the same person: * One of these devices says the person is online, the other says they are offline. * Message order is different between the different devices. * My iPhone is missing the last several messages sent for an hour now, even though I reboot, reconnect etc. * Unlike things like FB messenger, you can't tell for sure when they read the message. * Messages got stuck in the system for hours today (leading me to great personal strife). Why oh why do we use this junk when FB messanger has so far lifted the bar of good design, reliability and user interface over Skype which seems stuck in the 1990s, Skype can't release anything that isn't full of bugs, they don't release even basic new features, and it hasn't even been as reliable as it used to be 5 years ago for a long time. Just junk, that's all.

Hi, Don't wanna use the GMail app (don't like it really).Besides, this used to work perfect before the update, so it's clearly a bug. On other issue I found:When deleting a message which is open (using the trash can symbol at the top), sometimes the mail reappears when the app goes back to the inbox.When deleting using a swipe action, this never seems to happen.

Message Ordering or Singlton Service in SOA Suite 11g

In SOA Suite 10g, JMS Adapter could behaviors as Singleton instance by setting the properties "XclusterGroupId".
In addition, set Routing Service to be Synchronous execution, therefore only one instance consuming the Target message queue sequentially.
Does this properties still take effect in SOA Suite 11g, as I didn't find this properties being mentioned through Adapter Technology documentations?
Otherwise are there any other solutions for the Message Ordering?
Thank you in advance.
-Simon
Edited by: user8408910 on Jul 13, 2009 1:31 AM

Is it the same answer for JMS topic listeners? i.e. each new message on the topic should be processed once and only once by a Composite deployed to a cluster with >1 server instances.
Thanks for info,
Todd

AIM IM The message "Hello" could not be delivered. The other person appears to be offline. The user is not accepting offline messages. How do I change this setting?

AIM IM The message “Hello” could not be delivered. The other person appears to be offline. The user is not accepting offline messages. How do I change this setting?

HI,
The simple shortest answer is that you can't (Change a Buddy's settings)
From your own end you can reply to the first Off Line IM you get on an AIM login (an accompanying IM for AIMSysMessage asks if you want them to Continue - replying No stops them)
IF you have stopped Off Line IMS than you can reset this at AIM Settings
You can log in here with AIM and Apple IDs that end in @mac.com and @me.com (iCloud issued @me.com name are an Exception)
In addition the Setting in iChat > Preferences > General Section that refers to setting the Status to Off Line on Quit stops the App starting up if iChat is not launched but the computer is ON
8:16 PM Friday; March 23, 2012
Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"
 iMac 2.5Ghz 5i 2011 (Lion 10.7.3)
 G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
 MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
 Mac OS X (10.6.8),
"Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images."  No, Seriously

AIM account on Messages keep going offline

Hello,
I recently installed Mountain Lion on my iMac (iMac10,1) and added my AIM account to Messages.
When I am using Messages, my AIM account frequently goes offline by itself (and sometimes reconnects again).
I was wondering if this has happened to anyone else and if there is a fix.
Thank you,

Ive had this problem as well. I have four accounts two of which are yahoo accounts, 1 gmail, and 1 icloud. I have found that when you go to system preferences and then mail,contacts... and you click on details and retype your password it usually works. If that doesn't work though go to your email providers page and log in there and make sure your proxy settings are correct. Step two solved my issue. Hope this works for ya!

Huge bug in messages in iOS6

Anyone noticed the massive bug in messages since iOS6? If you select any of your previous message threads that were there pre-update that show as coming from a name rather than a number, eg banking, companies, etc - the preview is there but then when you touch it to drill down it shows blank, go back and hey presto the entry has completely disappeared. Force close messages and it comes back - but only to do the same thing.
I don't think the messages are being cleared as they come back when you quit i think it is just a bug in showing the messages - but this really needs fixing quick!!!!
Pretty poor bug to introduce this really.
Edit: Actually already posted/spotted by other people https://discussions.apple.com/message/19635920#19635920
This needs fixing pronto!!!!!!!

Perhaps this is a stupid question, but I don't see anywhere that you said you saved the file anywhere. You just said you opened Pages, worked on a document for a while, then closed Pages. Did you ever, at any point, save the document you were working on to the desired folder on the external drive, or were you just expecting Pages to do that for you? If the latter, note that Pages cannot know where you want to save a file, and though it will do its best not to lose your changes to a document that has not yet been saved to a specific location, that document can only be saved temporarily to the system drive.
If you did save it to the external drive, but you either didn't see the document in that location at all when you got home or you saw it but it did not contain your changes, the only possibilities I see are user error or a serious problem with your system.
Also, note that you're getting some bad information here. The .DocumentRevisions-V100 is not stored on the "root drive" (whatever that is supposed to mean). It is stored at the root level of whatever drive the document in question is stored on, assuming that volume is formatted as HFS+. (If it isn't, there's a problem that applies to Versions, but not to the specific problem you have described. See Beware Lion’s Versions Bug on Network and Non-HFS+ Volumes.)
So, if the document has, in fact, been saved to the external drive, and that drive is not formatted as HFS+, then you will be unable to use Versions with that document, but autosave will still work just fine, and you should see your latest changes in the document regardless of where you are.

JMS destination key used for message ordering not working

Hi there,
i'm using Weblogic 10.3. I've been trying to implement ordering of messages using a destination key assigned to a JMS message queue. The default ordering is FIFO (it uses the JMSMessageID in ascending order for this).
According to documentation (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/ConsoleHelp/taskhelp/jms_modules/destination_keys/ConfigureDestinationKeys.html) one can also configure the queue to behave in a LIFO manner by creating a destination which sorts on the JMSMessageID in a descending order.
I have tried this, it does not work. I have also played with different message priority settings and tried to sort on the JMSPriority field of the messages in ascending and descending order, it changes nothing. Messages keep being processed in a FIFO manner.
Has anyone been able accomplish message ordering other than FIFO? Am I missing something?
Any assistance would be highly appreciated!

Why not try
if (_key.keyPressed(TAB)) then
-- DO WHATEVER CONDITION
end if
im not sure if that is the correct way of telling the system
to use the TAB key but this works for RETURN when the user hits the
enter key, so if u substitute the TAB for the command to use the
TAB key im sure it will work
im sorry if it doesnt tho, but its worth a try if your still
struggling

About Message ordering in reliable web services..

Hi,
I am new to WebServices and right now I am handling the reliability of the webservice. I want to know what exactly is message ordering?
What the receiving RMP (Reliable Message Processor) should do if I send the message with the order of sequence nos like 2,9,4,7,1, etc..?
In which order the receiving RMP will send the messages to the WSDL , if I enabled Message Ordering in my request?
Any help regarding this will be highly solicited..
Reg,
BRKP.

Are you asking about "WS-ReliableMessaging" specifications?
If so that is a pretty big discussion which might fill up the forum disk space.
SOADevelopers
http://SOADevelopers.com

AIM account in Messages for osx 10.8

AIM account in Messages for osx 10.8 is connecting and disconnecting in Messages for Mac.

Thanks for the suggestion, tried that empty the trash rebooted the system but no change… messages still connects and disconnects continuously every couple of minutes more or less :-(. What is baffling is that on a MacBook Pro using the same network connections messages as solid as a rock but my new iMac isn't. Tried to reinstall mountain lion using the recovery partition but no success either.

Error message "order currently being processed" in print order thru IW37N

Hi,
I am getting error messages "order currently being proceesed by same user" & " material reservation for order being processed" when i am trying to take print of work order using t-code IW37N putting multiple orders. But I am able to take print then also. I am not able to understand why this message is coming before print comes out..I have not opened any more same transaction also on the screen.
I am getting this error message very frequently for other open orders also.
Plse suggest what can be the reason ?
Regards,
Vivek

Apart from standard shop papers selection 2010, 2020, 2030 if you define new like 3030 or 4040 and assigned with any custom program to print server system will issue this message.
Please check the standard config via transaction OIDF
Thanks
S.N

Web services and message ordering

i am a newbie to Rest services and camel. please help me. message(xml)will be sent from services at endpoint 1 to services exposed @ endpoint 2. i am not going to use queue or anything in between. but i want message ordering for few instances. so how is it possible. is there any option available. thanks

thanks for the response.
I dont wait for response 1 before sending request 2 and thats why am asking qn on how to preserve order. communication is not synchronous. i send multiple messages to different threads and i will not know the order across the whole message stream as each thread will process messages concurrently.
For example i will be sending message 1 and message 2 which should go in order. For some reason if message 2 goes before message 1 my whole requirement will fail. if i use queue in between i can preserve the order but am not going to use queue. so is there anything i can do to ensure that message 1 goes before message 2?

AIM account in Messages for osx 10.8 problems

AIM account in Messages for osx 10.8 is continually connecting and disconnecting in Messages for Mac. I have Mountain Lion 10.8.2 installed on a MacBook Pro 15 inch (10.8.2 installed over 10.7.4) with messages connections to AIM always working without a hitch, however, brand-new iMac 27 inch AIM and migrated home folder (using the same network connections) is continually connecting and disconnecting every 30 seconds or so. I have tried to delete the preferences, reinstall Mountain Lion using the recovery partition, erasing the disc and re-migrating but no success either. The only way I can get any use out of this AIM account is to keep the messages references open on the desktop and continually change the server settings between with and without SSL. All suggestions would be welcome.

Thanks for the suggestion, tried that empty the trash rebooted the system but no change… messages still connects and disconnects continuously every couple of minutes more or less :-(. What is baffling is that on a MacBook Pro using the same network connections messages as solid as a rock but my new iMac isn't. Tried to reinstall mountain lion using the recovery partition but no success either.

JMS Message ordering

What does the JMS specification (in J2EE version 1.3) say about queues having to support message ordering for messages of the same priority?
Is this a requirement or not....?
Thanks for your help.
Brent Miller
Chicago, IL

Hi,
About the order of message receipt, JMS1.1 specs say that Messages consumed by a session define a serial order. JMS defines that messages sent by a session to a destination must be received in the order in which they were sent. However, JMS does not define order of message receipt across destinations or across a destination's messages sent from multiple sessions.
However, an important point to note here is that several things can affect this order:
1) Messages of higher priority may be received before previous lower priority messages sent.
2) A client may not receive a NON_PERSISTENT messages due to a JMS provider failure.
3) If both PERSISTENT and NON_PERSISTENT messages are sent to a destination, order is only guaranteed within delivery mode i.e. a later NON_PERSISTENT message may be received before an earlier PERSISTENT message. However, it will definitely arrive ahead of an earlier NON_PERSISTENT message with the same priority.
Manish

Message Ordering with Message Listeners

          We have three Message Listeners listeners listening to JMS Queue
          for processing messages sent to the queue. Let us assume the listeners as L1,L2
          and L3. And lets says there are three
          messages that have been submitted to the queue in the order M1,M2 and M3. M1 goes
          to L1,M2 to L2 and M3 to L3. Everything is fine. When L2 finishes processing M2
          faster than the other two listeners, M4 which is submitted later does not get
          processed
          by L2. Instead it gets processed by L1. This is a very bizarre
          behaviour as it does not utilize the available lsitener L2.
          Is there any configuration setting which can change this behaviour??Or is this
          a Weblogic 7.0 Bug. Any help on this greatly appreciated.
          Thanx,
          Sankas


          Zach,
          Thanx a lot for your response. I have been trying to crack this
          for the past few days and does not seem to work. I have tried your suggestion
          of 3listeners and 6 messages. It did not do the trick. I even tried 10 messages.
          Still messages 1,4 and 7 go to the first listener even though it is not ready
          to process them.
          And thanx for the neat explaination on the MessagesMaximum thing. Actually I tried
          setting to 0 and the server does not start up properly.
          To me this issue seems to be pretty big. At least from our
          implementation point of view as the messages are not delivered
          to the available listener. Is'nt there a workaround for this??
          By telling the server that it does not want to be send any more incoming messages.
          I have tried all sorts of closes and stops on the connection and session objects.
          None of them work as the spec says they wait until the Message Listener returns
          and by
          the time it returns messages are already cached on the listener.
          So I would greatly appreciate if BEA can come up with a workaround for this
          as it is very crucial for our deployment. I am little bit surprised if this issue
          hasn't come up before.
          Thanx,
          Sankas
          "Zach" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >When you set the value to 1, there is one message in-flight at all times.
          >That is your listener has 1 message and 1 is on the way. If you have
          >3
          >listeners and send 4 messages then you will still see the behavior you
          >describe. Try sending at least 6 messages for your 3 listeners.
          >
          >In the next release we have modified this to allow you to set the value
          >to
          >zero. No messages are pre-delivered/in-flight.
          >
          >_sjz.
          >
          >"Sankas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          >news:[email protected]...
          >>
          >> Shean,
          >> I tried making the MessagesMaximum=1 change you suggested and
          >> it does not seem to do what you have said. Is there anything
          >> else that need to be changed?If you want to look at my listener
          >> code I can email it to you.
          >> Thanx,
          >> samkas
          >>
          >> "Sankas" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >> >
          >> >Shean,
          >> > Thanx a lot for your prompt reply. I will try the
          >> >configuration change of MessagesMaximum=1. Also is it possible
          >> >if I close the session of the message listener once I receive a
          >> >message. And open it once the listener is ready to process the
          >> >next message.
          >> >
          >> >Thanx,
          >> >Sankas
          >> >
          >> >
          >> >"Shean-Guang Chang" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >> >>For async consumer WLS JMS can buildup a message pipeline for each
          >consumer,
          >> >>which is tunable on the connection factory (MessagesMaximum).
          >> >>In your case you should set the message pipeline to 1 then L2 will
          >get
          >> >>M4.
          >> >>The pipeline is used to speedup message delivery to async consumer
          >and
          >> >>WLS
          >> >>JMS will try to fill up each async consumer's pipeline in round-robin.
          >> >>Thanks!
          >> >>
          >> >>"Sankas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          >> >>news:[email protected]...
          >> >>>
          >> >>> We have three Message Listeners listeners listening to JMS Queue
          >> >>> for processing messages sent to the queue. Let us assume the
          >listeners
          >> >>as
          >> >>L1,L2
          >> >>> and L3. And lets says there are three
          >> >>> messages that have been submitted to the queue in the order M1,M2
          >> >and
          >> >>M3.
          >> >>M1 goes
          >> >>> to L1,M2 to L2 and M3 to L3. Everything is fine. When L2 finishes
          >> >>processing M2
          >> >>> faster than the other two listeners, M4 which is submitted later
          >does
          >> >>not
          >> >>get
          >> >>> processed
          >> >>> by L2. Instead it gets processed by L1. This is a very bizarre
          >> >>> behaviour as it does not utilize the available lsitener L2.
          >> >>> Is there any configuration setting which can change this
          >behaviour??Or
          >> >>is this
          >> >>> a Weblogic 7.0 Bug. Any help on this greatly appreciated.
          >> >>> Thanx,
          >> >>> Sankas
          >> >>
          >> >>
          >> >
          >>
          >
          >

2 AIM Bugs (crlf & message order)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for