2 clients of 1 apo system connecting to 2 clients in same ECC system

Hi
We have a requirement at our end as below-
1)We have 2 clients in our APO Developement system and they are using BW functionality of APO
2)These 2 clients need to talk to 2 different client in our ECC System for ex:- APD has 2 clients(100 & 200) and ECC has two clients(101 and 201).
We need APD 100 to talk to ECC client 101 and APD client 200 talking to ECC client 201.
The query is - Is this possible to do the same .
If yes,can anyone guide me with some required documents

Hi sunny
One more query :-
The scenario is we want to connect 2 APO systems to 2 different clients of same ECC box
For Ex:-
ECC 100 ---> APD100
ECC 200 ---> APT200
There is only 1 ECC box with 2 clients.
I am not sure if we have some restrictions with regards to BW of APO connecting to 1 ECC box.
Do you have any idea if there are some issues while doing it as we will have 2 APO-BW client talking to 2 clients in ECC
Thanksbasisadmin

Similar Messages

Connecting multiple ECC Clients on same ECC system to BW system(s)

Hello.
We are considering connecting our Dev BW system to multiple clients on the same Dev ECC system. This connection would be for a limited time. We are wondering what the effect would be on the ECC system after we 'disconnect' our BW system from one of the clients.
Another thing we are considering is to create a seperate BW sandbox system and to connect that to a client on our Dev ECC system. The Dev ECC system will, at the same time, have a connection to a client on our existing Dev BW system. For example, having DEVBWcnlt100 -> DEVECCclnt100 and SNDBWclnt200 -> DEVECCclnt200 where DEVECC is a system and DEVBW and SNDBW are systems of their own. Our Sandbox BW system will have a limited life and at some point be taken down and no longer be a valid source system for the DEVECC system. We are concerned about what the impact would be to the DEV ECC system's client independent data once the Sandbox BW system is disconnected and taken down permenantly. Is 'residual' client independent data something we need to be concerned about? Is having two different BW systems connected to ECC clients on the same ECC systems a 'bad practice'? Any and all comments are welcome as we have not yet acted on our ideas yet.
Thanks very much for whatever comments you might provide,
Geoff.

We are considering connecting our Dev BW system to multiple clients on the same Dev ECC system. This connection would be for a limited time. We are wondering what the effect would be on the ECC system after we 'disconnect' our BW system from one of the clients.
No impact on the BW system. The only thing that you will have to take care of is that any process chains which fetch data from this DEV ECC system should not be put on periodic cycle because after disconnecting the ECC system, these would start failing.
Another thing we are considering is to create a seperate BW sandbox system and to connect that to a client on our Dev ECC system. The Dev ECC system will, at the same time, have a connection to a client on our existing Dev BW system. For example, having DEVBWcnlt100 -> DEVECCclnt100 and SNDBWclnt200 -> DEVECCclnt200 where DEVECC is a system and DEVBW and SNDBW are systems of their own. Our Sandbox BW system will have a limited life and at some point be taken down and no longer be a valid source system for the DEVECC system. We are concerned about what the impact would be to the DEV ECC system's client independent data once the Sandbox BW system is disconnected and taken down permenantly. Is 'residual' client independent data something we need to be concerned about?
Again no impact on ECC system. As for the client connected earlier to sandbox system, just clear all the queues in RSA7, LBWQ
Is having two different BW systems connected to ECC clients on the same ECC systems a 'bad practice'?
No its not at all a bad practice

Checking system connected to SOLMAN or Not from Satellite system

Hi ,
How to check system connected to SOLMAN or Not from Satellite system.
thanks in advance..
Rgds,
BBR.

All connections via SM and satellite system are view RFCs.
In SM, you will have 3-4 RFCs trusted/read/ etc pointing to satellite sm.
in satellite, you will have one RFC to SM called back RFC generally with name - Solution Manager created during SMSY configuration in SM.
Do a test for Connection/Authorization etc for all the RFC's which if fine then the connection is good..
Regards,
SS.

Connecting multiple C4C tenants to same HCI system

Hello Experts,
Please note that we already have a Cloud For Customer (C4C) system connected to our HCI system which is connected to our ERP system.
How can I connect another new C4C system to the same HCI system as above which connects to the same ERP backend system QEC.
Would this new C4C system use the same tenant/worker nodes or will there be a separate new one be created for this new C4C system.
Please let us know what is the best possible approach.
Regards
Indrasish

Hi Indrasish
THere are probably a couple of options. One is to adjust HCI to send to two receivers. We'd need to look more at how the data needs to flow.
The other is to have duplicate setup -the following is what we do for a training environment with mutliple C4C's connected to one HCI and one ERP:
* C4C tenants have the communication system for ERP that points to HCI
* If you will have the same iflow from the ERP to each tenant, e.g. material master from ERP to C4C tenant1, material master from ERP to C4C tenant 2 - then you need to do the following:
*** HCI import the iflow, rename the iflow and the manifest. When you deploy you will also need a unique name. for example: /cxf/ERP/COD/ADR3MAS03_TR99 - deploy the service with the extension
*** in ERP in the RFC destination to HCI you need to also adjust the RFC dest, for example, /cxf/ERP/COD/ADR3MAS03_TR99 so that the deployed iflow name matches.
*** the deployed iflow also has the updated URL for the related C4C tenant.
In this situation you have duplicate iflow for each C4C tenant. The other option is to use one iflow and have two receivers, this would assume everything always goes to both tenants.
Does this make sense or is it confusing?
-ginger

XI and PI connecting to the same ECC system

I had read this thread XI and PI
Currently, our ECC is connecting to XI. In Integration Engine config of ECC, role of business system is "Application System". In XI, role is "Integration Server". If we need to add a PI and connect to ECC, what should be done or what is the workaround that can make XI and PI connecting to ECC at the same time?
Thanks.

Hi Mark,
Thanks for the suggested blog, I need some time to study this. I do not understand why 'standard' integration server is defined as 'Application System'.
I also need to study the limitation of SPROXY on SAP application server refer to only one XI/PI system. May be the issue of my scenario is not just connecting multiple XI/PI to ECC system.
The scenario:
Maximo MEA 6.2 <-> XI 3.0 <--> ECC (current)
Maximo MEA 7.5 <--> PI 7.x <--> ECC (to be added)
Any input or experience sharing? Thanks.
Regards,
Donald

Can two different SRM clients systems connect to one R/3 Back-end system?

Hello,
Trying to developing SRM Co-Exist/Global strategy, based on the following scenario:
1. Two different SRM client systems, each at DIFFERENT SRM Version/Release Level. SRM system "A" runs in Stand-Alone and Extend Classic Scenario mode. SRM system "B" runs in Classic Scenario mode
2. Two different R/3 back-end systems, each with SAME R/3 4.7 Version/Release Level.
Question 1: Can the two (2) different SRM client systems be connected to one (1) of the R/3 back-end systems?
Question 2: Are there any Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) issues/difficulties to consider from either the SRM client or R/3 back-end side?
Question 3: Does each SRM client need it own unique transaction document type(s) and number range(s) definitions?
Question 4: Are there any other difficulties, for example, with RFC and Partner Profile related definitions and what are the steps to address/resolve difficulties?
Please advise and thanks in advance for your feedback!
Regards,
Ed
Edited by: Ed Shigo on Mar 16, 2009 6:40 AM

Question 1: Can the two (2) different SRM client systems be connected to one (1) of the R/3 back-end systems?
They can be connected
Question 2: Are there any Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) issues/difficulties to consider from either the SRM client or R/3 back-end side?
Make sure that you have unique consumer entries for Middleware for Material replication, RFCs etc
Question 3: Does each SRM client need it own unique transaction document type(s) and number range(s) definitions?
Yes you need to have them.
Question 4: Are there any other difficulties, for example, with RFC and Partner Profile related definitions and what are the steps to address/resolve difficulties?
Don't see any difficulties as long as the a structured approach is followed.

Permissions Metadata User for System Connection in CE 7.2

Hi,
I want to create a system connection in NWA to an R/3 system with WSIL as service source. The Metadata User has SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW. But when I ping the system, following error is displayed: u201CUser credentials are valid but user does not have valid access rightsu201D
In Log Viewer following exception is listed:
[EXCEPTION]
com.sap.engine.services.webservices.jaxrpc.exceptions.InvalidResponseCodeException: Invalid Response Code: (403) Forbidden. The requested URL was:"Connect to http://XXHOST:xxPORT/sap/bc/srt/wsil?sap-client=030, used user to connect: XXUSER, used sap-client: 030"
at com.sap.esi.esp.service.server.query.discovery.WSTransportSettingsResolverSoa.resolveEntity(WSTransportSettingsResolverSoa.java:432)
at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.espbase.query.WSQueryImpl.initialize(WSQueryImpl.java:351)
at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.espbase.query.WSQueryImpl.findWSInterfaces(WSQueryImpl.java:282)
at com.sap.esi.esp.wsquery.ui.wsquerycomp.WSQueryComp.searchByPhysicalSystem(WSQueryComp.java:744)
at com.sap.esi.esp.wsquery.ui.wsquerycomp.WSQueryComp.search(WSQueryComp.java:372)
at com.sap.esi.esp.wsquery.ui.wsquerycomp.wdp.InternalWSQueryComp.wdInvokeMethod(InternalWSQueryComp.java:458)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.generation.ExternalControllerPI$ExternalInterfaceInvocationHandler.invoke(ExternalControllerPI.java:339)
If I open the WSIL-URL in browser with the metadata user, the xml-structure with the services is displayed.
We are on CE 7.2 SP3.
Hope, anybody has an idea.
Kind Regards,
Gerhard

Hi
Have you defined the HOST file entry? and , try with user having admin rights.
Best Regards
Satish Kumar

CALL_FUNCTION_OPEN_ERROR in CRM while trying to connect to ECC system

Hi All,
We are having issues while connecting to ECC system from CRM at specific point of time.
It occurred only once yesterday . Since it is a production system, we need to investigate the cause of the issue.
Upon checking the logs, I can see dumps in ST22 stating CALL_FUNCTION_OPEN_ERROR while trying to connect to ECC.
This issue has been faced by multiple users at the same time.
Both CRM and ECC are in the same server . There are no errors in ECC system ,
The error description says
Error opening RFC connection
Error text........... "Group USER not found"
Description.......... "LgIGroupX"
The response time is fine for the system and during the time when the error occurred.
Both the systems are in kernel 720 patch level 416.
There are no errors in dev_rd and dev_ms as well.
The errors in trace file also give information that ECC system cannot be reached.
However our ECC system was available , up and running and there were no issues at that time with ECC.
I have attached the dump, kernel and patch level details , work process trace files and the response times.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Sowmya.

LB: Hostname or service of the message server unknown#DEST =PUCCLNT220#MSHOST
=puc.apps.eon.com#R3NAME =PUC#GROUP =USER"
disp+work information
kernel release 720
kernel make variant 720_EXT_REL
compiled on Linux GNU SLES-11 x86_64 cc4.3.4 use-pr121116 for linuxx86_64
compiled for 64 BIT
compilation mode UNICODE
compile time Feb 16 2013 02:50:12
update level 0
patch number 416
source id 0.416
Error from work process trace file
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
A reached MAX_RUDILOCKS for (user: L13526      , ta:                     ), sending RUDILOCK_RESET
M
M Mon Apr 20 15:48:09 2015
M ThPlgTimeout: ThPlgTimeout for plugin T144/U17974
A
A Mon Apr 20 15:58:59 2015
A *** ERROR => RFC Error RFCIO_ERROR_SYSERROR in abrfcpic.c : 2825
LB: Hostname or service of the message server unknown
DEST =PUCCLNT220
MSHOST =puc.apps.eon.com
R3NAME =PUC
GROUP =USER
[abrfcio.c    9213]
A {root-id=441EA15C8F181ED4B9E4168F16E66417}_{conn-id=441EA15C8F181ED4B9E416A941234417}_1
A TH VERBOSE LEVEL FULL
A ** RABAX: end RX_GET_MESSAGE
A
A Mon Apr 20 15:59:02 2015
A *** ERROR => RFC Error RFCIO_ERROR_SYSERROR in abrfcpic.c : 2825
LB: Hostname or service of the message server unknown
DEST =PUCCLNT220
MSHOST =puc.apps.eon.com
R3NAME =PUC
GROUP =USER
[abrfcio.c    9213]
A {root-id=441EA15C8F181ED4B9E4168F16E66417}_{conn-id=441EA15C8F181ED4B9E416A941234417}_1
A *** ERROR => RFC Error RFCIO_ERROR_SYSERROR in abrfcpic.c : 2825
LB: Hostname or service of the message server unknown
DEST =PUCCLNT220
MSHOST =puc.apps.eon.com
R3NAME =PUC
GROUP =USER
[abrfcio.c    9213]
A {root-id=441EA15C8F181ED4B9E4168F16E66417}_{conn-id=441EA15C8F181ED4B9E416A941234417}_1
A *** ERROR => RFC Error RFCIO_ERROR_SYSERROR in abrfcpic.c : 2825
LB: Hostname or service of the message server unknown
DEST =PUCCLNT220
MSHOST =puc.apps.eon.com
R3NAME =PUC
GROUP =USER
[abrfcio.c    9213]
A {root-id=441EA15C8F181ED4B9E4168F16E66417}_{conn-id=441EA15C8F181ED4B9E416A941234417}_1

ITS 6.20 connect to another client doesn't work

We have an ITS 6.20 .
Glabal service belong the caracteristics of connection to SAP server (login, pasword, client, systemnamme, systemnumber).
I want to connect to another client but all the others parameter stay the same as in global service definition.
The idea I have is to put the client in the URL as parameter but it doesn't work
example of the URL:
http://[server]/scripts/wgate/ZAXB18W/!?client=300&record=1&templatelanguage=EN&username=zzz&cdealer=80023456&sessionid=493460714&~check=7ED3B4B75260C2ABA6EA4EF77706770F
The connection doesn't hold in count the client parameter. It is connected with the client of global parameter.
Is there anybody who can help me ?.

Hello Eric,
You'll need to remove the ~client value in the global.srvc file (and service file of the service being called). Than the ~client parameter in the URL should work.
Edgar

Source System Connection Problem - RSAR 371

We are attempting to create source system connections in our newly created NW2004s Dev system (sapdvbd1/BD1). We also have an existing NW2004s Dev system (sapsvbd1/BD1) which already contains the same source system connections. The old Dev system was on a virtual machine but due to performance issues we have built another Dev system on a real server. Is there any way to create these source system connections on both servers until everything has been moved from the old to the new? The same source systems need to exist on both. Thanks.

Hi ,
Please check with basis or if you can ,then try to restore the source system in BI/BW.This should correct the inconsistencies between the two systems which is being caused by different Idoc types
Also check the table RSBASIDOC in the BI system and compare this to R/3 system ,the "basic type" field should be same.
A restore should work,it has always worked for me.
Regards
Amit

ME 5.2 connection with two ECC systems

Hi Sergiy/Experts,
Need to connect ME 5.2 system with two ECC & SCM systems for a scenario. Is it possible to connect?
During SAPMEINT standard interface we get connection credentials point for only one ECC system.
How I can meet the scenario for ECC system?
will appreciate your help.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Yes, it is possible. See my answer here:
http://scn.sap.com/message/14408145#14408145
There is a design limitation: plants must be unique across the different ERPs connected to the same SAPMEINT.
Regards,
Sergiy

Provider Webservice in Backend ECC system (NW 7.0, Enp1) and PI /XI 7.0,

Hello
Our backend ECC is on EnhP4 (there by NW 7.0, EnhP1), As I understand, since NW 7.0, SP 14, webservices runtime has been changed significantly to support asynchronous webservices (through WS-RM).
This ECC system is connected to our PI 7.0 system. In the back end ECC system, when I create ABAP server proxy for a synchronous interface from SPROXY, the generated proxy is also visible as a service in SOAMANAGER. However, when I do the same for asynchronous interface, the service is not visible in SOAMANAGER.
Is this an expected behavior? Does this mean, we can only expose 'out side in' approach webservices in synchronous mode if the ESR is of version 7.0? The reason I say this is when I connect the same ECC system a PI 7.1 system, I am able to expose asynchronous services that are generated out of SPROXY.
The intent here is to design the interfaces in XI 7.0, expose them as web service in ECC and consume the webservice using another EAI tool that supports WS-RM.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks
KK

Stefan
Thanks. Your answer makes sense with what we are observing. Do you know if this is documented somewhere in help documentation or some note.
On another note what doesn't make sense to me is why this limitation? Not sure what I am missing. Doesn't the webservice runtime in NW 7.0 support WS-RM from SP14. Why should it be dependent on the version of PI in case of point to point webservice. Unless you say we can use WS-RM in back end NW 7.0 through PI 7.1's WS adapter only.
For me this sounds like a limitation on the NW 7.0/SP14 side. What do you think?
KK
Edited by: Krishnakumar Ramamoorthy on May 31, 2009 5:50 PM

Dynamic Interface Determination Using the same Business System

Folks...
Does anyone have any good ideas on how to build a scenario where the same business system is used, but the interface mapping needs to be dynamic? I have a single JMS sender and 40 different message types on one side, and 40 ABAP Proxies on the other. The two solutions I see are as follows:
1. Create 40 separate JMS Senders with 40 different sender agreements
2. Create 40 Business Services for the same ECC system and utilize XPath expressions to support conditionally selecting an interface mapping
Neither of these in my mind is a great solution, does anyone have any others?
Mahalo,
Jonathan

Hi, I came cross the same problem on my current project, now I have following solution:
Create a number of JMS sender adapters, they all connect to same queue, but each JMS sender adapter only pick up particular type of message based on one JMS message property value. The message provider will be responsible to set the property value when they send message into the queue.
In JMS sender adapter, Parameter Tab -> Advanced Tab ->check Set Adapter-Specific message Attributes ->check Specify Additional JMS Message Properties (Maxmum of 10) -> Add Property name, e.g. "MsgType"
->Processing Tab -> Input Value in "JMS Message Selector", e.g. MsgType='WorkOrder'
after above setup, this adapter will only pick up messages that with "MsgType" Property value "WorkOrder"
For each type of adapter, you will create a JMS sender adapter and repeat the steps above, just put on the different Property value.
This approach will have number of Integration Scenarios, hence will have number of Sender Agreement.
I have tested the approach and it works.
Liang

Two Tracks for the same Runtime System?

Hello,
can you please tell me if it is allowed to connect two tracks to the same runtime systems?
We have already a track connected to our systems. Now we have created a new track to deliver different content to those systems. We wanted to connect the new track to the same runtime systems. Our basis team told me that a where-used message came up that told them "The following runtime systems are already used elsewhere in the CMS domain".
Can you tell us if we will get problems because of this?
Thanks in advance,
Br,
Michael

Hello again,
ok now, thats something completely different CRM modification is always special.
To be honest i cannot tell for sure what will happen. As far as i know the default deploy strategy of NWDI is "deploy any version" which means NWDI will order SDM to just deploy not regarding any SDM Version (you are on a 7.0x System right?)
So it should be possible if everything else, excelt those 2 DCs is the same things should work. But if not the last deplyoed version of the shared DCS will be active. Which might lead to problems then.
As far as you described, the setup is as the CRM modification guides mentioned.
My first thought is that you are not forced to use CUSTCRMPRJ as SC name for the projects as far as I know. OS maybe the leanest thing would be to just use CUSTCRMPRJ_light (.o)) for the second track.
Hmmm not sure if this is a good idea or thought to the end. I don't have the CRM modifications guide at hand at the moment. But I guess there was a part where something was mentioned similar to this.
After all I have to say:Sorry. I can't give you solid, reliable tip/advice for this case. Maybe my thought will help you.
Or maybe someone else knows better.
Have a good time
Jan

Regarding mountain lion server: clients experience intermittent service connections. the server system log has the following error- Client handshake failed (6):113: Server not accepting client connections (any ideas???)

regarding mountain lion server: clients experience intermittent service connections. the server system log has the following error- Client handshake failed (6):113: Server not accepting client connections. any suggestions would be greatly appreciated - thank you

Hi Jason
I was getting the same behavior after Apple support had me delete some plist files to get Airplay going. I was also getting the following error:
the error occurred while processing a command of type 'writesettings' in the plug-in 'server vpn'
I went into ~/Library/Preferences/ and /Library/Preferences/ and deleted every plist contating the word server. I had to re-set up my server (meaning walk through some intial steps) but all of my settings were still there after that and everything started working again.
Just a thought, obviously try at your own risk but it worked for me.
Kellen

2 clients of 1 apo system connecting to 2 clients in same ECC system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for