2 Column Label side to side in Pivot Table

Dear Gurus,
I have this pivot:
2 Column
2 Row Dim 4,Dim 5
Dim 1, Dim 2 Measures Dim 6, Dim 7
The question is, I can't arrange Dim 4 and Dim 5 side by side, but it only can arrange line this: Dim 4
Dim 5
How to arrange it to Dim 4 || Dim 5?
Please Help
Regards
Maria

Hi,
Thank you for reply, I mean how to arrange 2 column side by side in pivot table
like this:
Dim A Dim B (in column pivot)
I can drag 2 column in column pivot table but the display look like this:
Dim A
Dim B
(I can't drag Dim B next to Dim A but only can put it under Dim A)
I use OBIEE 11.1.1.3
Any help will be appreciated
Thank you
Maria

Similar Messages

How to display the column into the narrative or section from pivot table

I have a report. I have the basic number displayed in the pivot table, but missing one column and I need move one column to the top. The column missing (% of tested) should be calculated by column c /column F's last number, ie, F7=48. My desired column would be H3=c3/F48 9/48, H4=c4/F488/48.... But I could not get the number 48 into my formula, because it is the running total of the all column E. These data is in Pivot table.
I also need display No of Students 74 in the top of the report. I am not able to get this number from pivot table. It is count distinct on student key from the repository.
I appreciate any help.
A     B     C     D     E     F     G
2          # of Questions     Average # Correct     % Correct     Running total no. of test items     No of students
3     PATTERNS, FUNCTIONS, AND ALGEBRA     9     4.68     51.95     9     74
4     PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS     8     3.97     49.66     17     74
5     MEASUREMENT AND GEOMETRY     11     6.11     55.53     28     74
6     NUMBER AND NUMBER SENSE     8     4.16     52.03     36     74
7     COMPUTATION AND ESTIMATION     12     8.2     68.36     48     74
Edited by: user7315022 on Feb 3, 2010 2:28 PM

I wish it was this easy. I must not explain it right. All the score from each student and each question for each subject and each test is stored in database. The number of question for the subject is the max of the questions for each subject. Basically, it needs 'parittion by'... But in the OBIEE, it would not let me add any 'partition by' in the column formula. Is this true? ie, can you use partition by in the column formula? Here are the query from trace file.
RqList
TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME as c1 GB,
REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR as c2 GB,
MAX_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.MAX_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] as c3 GB,
STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER as c4 GB,
DIVISION_TOTAL_TESTS:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.DIVISION_TOTAL_TESTS by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] as c5 GB,
RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME as c6 GB,
RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME as c7 GB,
TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME as c8 GB,
SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME as c9 GB,
SUM_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.SUM_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] as c10 GB,
SUM_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.SUM_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] / nullif( COUNT_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.COUNT_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] , 0) as c11 GB,
MAX_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.MAX_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] as c12 GB,
(SUM_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.SUM_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] / nullif( COUNT_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.COUNT_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] , 0)) / nullif( MAX_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.MAX_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME, STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER] )] , 0) * 100 as c13 GB,
STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY as c14 GB,
STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.STUDENTS_KEY as c15 GB,
max(SUM_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.SUM_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] )] by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] at_distinct [ ] ) / nullif( max(COUNT_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.COUNT_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] )] by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] at_distinct [ ] ) , 0) as c16 GB,
(max(SUM_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.SUM_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] )] by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] at_distinct [ ] ) / nullif( max(COUNT_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.COUNT_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] )] by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] at_distinct [ ] ) , 0)) / nullif( max(MAX_TEST_SCORE:[DAggr(STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.MAX_TEST_SCORE by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] )] by [ REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR, TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME] at_distinct [ ] ) , 0) * 100 as c17 GB
DetailFilter: RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS.TEST_LEVEL_NAME = 'GRADE 5' and SCHOOLS.SCHOOL_NAME = 'GLASGOW MIDDLE' and TEST_SCORE_TYPES.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME = 'RAW SCORE' and TEST_YEAR_SEASONS.TEST_SEASON_NAME = 'SPRING' and REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS.SCHOOL_YEAR = '200102' and TESTS.TEST_ID = 'SOL' and TEST_DEFINITIONS.PARENT_TEST_SUBJECT_NAME = 'MATHEMATICS' and STUDENT_TEST_SCORES.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER < 900
OrderBy: c1 asc, c2 asc, c4 asc, c6 asc, c7 asc, c8 asc, c9 asc, c14 asc, c15 asc
+++azadams:320000:32001b:----2010/02/03 16:48:36
-------------------- Sending query to database named tacdev (id: <<51109>>):
select distinct D1.c5 as c1,
D1.c4 as c2,
D1.c9 as c3,
D1.c14 as c4,
D1.c12 as c5,
D1.c6 as c6,
D1.c7 as c7,
D1.c15 as c8,
D1.c8 as c9,
D1.c11 as c10,
D1.c11 / decode(D1.c10 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c10) as c11,
D1.c9 as c12,
(D1.c11 / decode(D1.c10 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c10)) / decode(D1.c9 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c9) * 100 as c13,
D1.c13 as c14,
D1.c16 as c15,
D1.c3 / decode(D1.c2 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c2) as c16,
(D1.c3 / decode(D1.c2 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c2)) / decode(D1.c1 , 0 , to_number(null), D1.c1) * 100 as c17
from
(select max(D1.c1) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c5, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c8) as c1,
sum(D1.c2) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c5, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c8) as c2,
sum(D1.c3) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c5, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c8) as c3,
D1.c4 as c4,
D1.c5 as c5,
D1.c6 as c6,
D1.c7 as c7,
D1.c8 as c8,
max(D1.c1) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c16, D1.c5, D1.c13, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c15, D1.c8) as c9,
sum(D1.c2) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c16, D1.c5, D1.c13, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c15, D1.c8) as c10,
sum(D1.c3) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c16, D1.c5, D1.c13, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c15, D1.c8) as c11,
sum(D1.c12) over (partition by D1.c4, D1.c16, D1.c5, D1.c13, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c15, D1.c8) as c12,
D1.c13 as c13,
D1.c14 as c14,
D1.c15 as c15,
D1.c16 as c16
from
(select max(T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER) as c1,
count(T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER) as c2,
sum(T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER) as c3,
T33435.SCHOOL_YEAR as c4,
T34232.TEST_SEASON_NAME as c5,
T52429.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME as c6,
T52429.TEST_LEVEL_NAME as c7,
T59709.SCHOOL_NAME as c8,
count(T36922.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY) as c12,
T36922.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY as c13,
T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER as c14,
T56693.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME as c15,
T36922.STUDENTS_KEY as c16
from
SCHOOLS T59709,
TEST_DEFINITIONS T58733,
TEST_SCORE_TYPES T56693,
RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS T52429,
TEST_YEAR_SEASONS T34232,
REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS T33435,
TESTS T34149,
DETAIL_TEST_SCORES T33341,
STUDENT_STANDARD_TEST T36922,
TEST_SCORES T56699
where ( T33341.TEST_SCORE_TYPES_KEY = T56693.TEST_SCORE_TYPES_KEY and T36922.ADMIN_SCHOOLS_KEY = T59709.SCHOOLS_KEY and T34232.TEST_YEAR_SEASONS_KEY = T36922.TEST_YEAR_SEASONS_KEY and T33435.REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS_KEY = T36922.REPORTING_SCHOOL_YEARS_KEY and T34149.TESTS_KEY = T36922.TESTS_KEY and T36922.TEST_DEFINITIONS_KEY = T58733.TEST_DEFINITIONS_KEY and T33341.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY = T36922.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY and T33341.TEST_SCORES_KEY = T56699.TEST_SCORES_KEY and T33435.SCHOOL_YEAR = '200102' and T34149.TEST_ID = 'SOL' and T34232.TEST_SEASON_NAME = 'SPRING' and T36922.RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS_KEY = T52429.RPT_TEST_DEFINITIONS_KEY and T52429.TEST_LEVEL_NAME = 'GRADE 5' and T56693.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME = 'RAW SCORE' and T58733.PARENT_TEST_SUBJECT_NAME = 'MATHEMATICS' and T59709.SCHOOL_NAME = 'GLASGOW MIDDLE' and T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER < 900 )
group by T33435.SCHOOL_YEAR, T34232.TEST_SEASON_NAME, T36922.STDNT_STNDRD_TEST_KEY, T36922.STUDENTS_KEY, T52429.TEST_SUBJECT_NAME, T52429.TEST_LEVEL_NAME, T56693.TEST_SCORE_TYPE_NAME, T56699.TEST_SCORE_NUMBER, T59709.SCHOOL_NAME
) D1
) D1

How to Sort Dimension in Pivot Table via Order Column which is changing like Factual values

Hi,
Recently in of our product offerings we got stuck on this following question:
How to Sort Dimension based on the Order Value which Keeps Changing with Factual Values??
We have a data source laid out as (example)
In the above the “Order” columns are changing per
Company/(DimensionA) for DimesnsionB.
Instead what we want is: (But only if we can get the following result without putting the “Order” Column in the “Values” Section.
If there are any configurations that we can make to our power pivot model for the similar data set so that the
DimesnionB in this case can be sorted by the Order column, would be greatly helpful to us.
Sample File:
http://tms.managility.com.au/query_example.xlsx
Thanks
Amol

Hi Amol,
According to your description, you need to sort dimension members in Pivot Table via order column, and you don't want the order column show on the Pivot table, right?
Based on my research, we can sort the data on the Pivot table based on one of the columns in that table, and we cannot sort the data based on the columns that not existed on the Pivot table. So in your scenario, to achieve your requirement, you can
add the column to pivot table and hide it.
https://support.office.com/en-gb/article/Sort-data-in-a-PivotTable-or-a-PivotChart-report-49efc50a-c8d9-4d34-a254-632794ff1e6e
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Percentage of Total Count of Category in Raw Data Column in Pivot Table

I have normalized my data in Excel and I have a column: "question 1" and then a column for "gender" which has values as "female" and "male". I have created a pivot table for these two variables, "Gender" and
"Question 1". My values for Females and Males from the Gender data are presented within my pivot table. I want to present these numbers as percentages of Total "Females" and "Males" that are in the "Gender" column in
my master dataset. Pivot tables will only allow me to do %'s of data already in the pivot table
I am attempting to use Calculated Fields within Pivot Tables to resolve this. I do not want to create a separate column in my master data set, but rather, complete all calculations within the pivot table

Thank you very much,
The steps you provided use the total "gender" within the pivot table as the "grand total".
If I have a binomial variable, "gender" with "male" as one of the variables, I need the grand total be the total male in the raw data.
Example: if there are 100 total males in the raw data for the column "gender"
and I construct a pivot table with a dependent variable which is a survey question and "gender" and 30 males "agreed" with the survey question and 20 females "agreed" with the survey question, your instructions for % of grand total would show 60% for
males who agree [males + females who replied to the survey question],
when, what I need is the total males in the raw data, 100, used as the total so that the percentage of males who answered "agreed" to the survey question is 30% of all males.
Thank you very much

Variance between 2 columns in a Pivot Table

Hello,
We have an analysis that is a Union of 2 analysis. It has two result columns in the Union, each column have a value of one month. We have to create a third column with the variance between the second and first column.
We are using a Pivot Table and creating a New Calculated Item in the month column with difference between the columns ($2 - $1). But this results in four different columns - The 2 original ones and the difference repeated (for each month).
Pls. is there a way to build the pivot table the way we need it ? with just the 3rd column as a variance result.
Txs for any help.
Antonio

You may get the logical query as below
SELECT saw_0, saw_1, FROM (
(SELECT A saw_0, B saw_1 FROM "SA" )
UNION
(SELECT C saw_0, D saw_1 FROM "SA" )
) t1 ORDER BY saw_0
I would suggest to create another column at first line of SELECT so that you can use those saw_0, saw_1 columns to get another column something like
SELECT saw_0, saw_1, saw_0+saw_1 FROM (
(SELECT A saw_0, B saw_1 FROM "SA" )
UNION
(SELECT C saw_0, D saw_1 FROM "SA" )
) t1 ORDER BY saw_0
This is just a hint you need to put in your requirements
if make sense mark :)
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on May 14, 2013 10:35 AM

Hide/remove column in adf pivot table

Is it somehow possible to hide or to remove column (I need to hide agregate column, but is it possible for regular data cell) dynamically when some conditions are met? I've tried getDataFormat and getheaderFormat methods to set width of the columns to 0, but it doesn't work. Also I've tried to set rawvalue of data cell to null/"" and width to 0 but without success to hide column. Problem applies to adf pivot table 11g.
Thank You!

HI,
You have the option for the column as to be suppress or repeat
Go to column properties and go to column format second tab select the option Suppress.
Regards,
VG

OBIEE: Pivot table chart is not proper when GOURL is on Measure Column

Hi All,
I a facing an issue with Pivot table chart drill.
Pivot Table columns:
Row description column in row section.
Column description (Periods) in column section and
A Number format amount column in Measure Section (In BMM it is not defined as a measure column).
GOURL written on the Measure column to enable the drill in Pivot table data.
When I click on chart the pivoted reasults Graph: Vertical Bar, Type: Default, Style: Rectangle.
It shows the row description in X axis but the amount is not shown properly (it just shows 1,2,3..numbers on Y axis instead of the amounts which are in lakhs) on Y axis and alos there is not vertical bars showing up.
Any help in this regard is very helpfull.
Regards,
Sagar Vishwanathwar.

hi Karthikeyan,
use combined with similar request(union report)
In first criteria show all the columns
Second criteria 'Grand total' , year ,month, avg _formula that u have
Thanks,
Saichand.v

Sort Order in Pivot Table

Hi,
I am unable to get sort order in desc , even if I specify the descending order for that measure column in criteria.
The view I'm using is Pivot View.
Thankyou,
Vinay

Assuming the column you want to sort on is not the first column in the rows section of your pivot table, then do this:
1) Duplicate the column that you wish to sort on.
2) Move that column all the way to the left so it is the first column.
3) Apply the sort to this column.
4) Hide the column.
This will sort the pivot table...

DrillDown in Pivot Table - answer

How can I have a column title drill down in a pivot table?
When you create a regular table the user can do a Drill down by clicking the column title or a particular element.. when he click over the column title he get a drill down for all the element...
When I create a Pivot Table I'm getting only the element drilldown and loosing the column title drilldown
Thanks!!!

How about just using a column selector? Would be a lot easier. If you show "Continent" by default as a level of your geo hierarhcy (just an example) and you want to see all "Regions" then you can just switch between levels with the column selector. Add the necessary prompts to the page to be able to constrain the data set retrieved and Bob's you uncle.
Cheers,
C.

Conditional formating in Pivot Table

Hi All,
I have 3 columns Year, Month & Sales in my pivot table. I have applied conditional formatting to sales column as
if sales < 20 million Red
Sales > 30 million green
Sales between 20, 30 yellow
Now,
I have set the drilldown such that, when i drill down the year it drills down to prod categories --> products --> etc
when i have just year, month & sales everything looks good, but when i drill down to next level ie: product category, the conditional formatting is getting carried to the next level which i dont want to.
Is there any way to make sure that the conditional formatting does not carry forward or give a new set of conditions to the next level.
Thanks in Advance,
VNK

With Navigation, you can customize the report that the parent report goes to when a user clicks on a value (or column). Set your child report with all the columns you want and with whatever conditional formatting you want.
On the value you want the user to click on to go to this child report, click on the format properties (finger icon) and click on the Column tab. Set the Value Interaction to Navigation and point to the child report.
In the child report, on the same column (you need to have the same column in the child report), add an "Is Prompted" filter.
This will give you full control of the conditional formatting you desired and the "drill down" effect.

Wrong order in pivot table using Rank function

Hi Gurus,
I have the following query:
SELECT Periods."Year" saw_0, Periods."Month" saw_1, SalesFacts.Dollars saw_2, RANK(SalesFacts.Dollars BY Periods."Year") saw_3
FROM SupplierSales ORDER BY saw_0, saw_3
In table view the order is correct.
However in pivot table for 1998 (year) the order is correct, for 1999 not!
Ordering : 1. Year, 2. RANK
Page: Year, Rows : Months
Measures : Dollars and RANK
( I tried to put the RANK into Rows section, the result is same )
What is the reason of this strange behavior?
Thanks
Laszlo

Try Sort Column and Row properties given in pivot Table Chart...
Maybe your problem will resolve

Can I navigate and drill down in chart and pivot table?

In the fact, the end user want to navigate to a detail report request when drill down to the final level.
I know when use table, I can navigate on data and drill down on column.
But in chart and "pivot table", I do not find the option of interaction to achieve this.
Any suggestion?

You can drill down in charts but I just saw you can't in pivots (strange because I assumed that that must be possible)
However, you can always use guided navigation!

Add additional DESC column at right side of pivot table in bi publisher

ARABIC DESC
India
UAE
Total
English DESC
QUANT_DECIMAL
VALUE_DHS
QUANT_DECIMAL
VALUE_DHS
QUANT_DECIMAL
VALUE_DHS
0
0
0
0
0
0
اجر
4
4
23
5619
27
5623
ABC
اجر
0
0
10
3510
10
3510
CDF
ملابس
0
0
14
772
14
772
XYX
جالية
0
0
25
2020
25
2020
EJB
Total
4
4
72
11921
76
11925
please help me to add another column at right side of pivot table as marked in blue.
1st column indicates in arabic desc and my client want english desc at right side of pivot table
country is group by as INdia and UAE.
Please help me to display the above report in pivot table in BI Publisher;
Thanks
Naveen

Naveen,
Do you have that column in the database?
Thanks,
Sasi Nagireddy..

Sorting Column's Label in Pivot Table

Hi Fellows !!
This is my problem: I have two tables, dates and rates, providing me data for a report. Dates has a DateId (number), Year(number) and Month(varchar2(12)), and Rates has DateId(number) and RateAmount(number). I wrote a quite simple query to obtain report's data:
SELECT DATES.YEAR, DATES.MONTH, RATES.RATEAMOUNT
FROM DATES, RATES
WHERE DATES.DATEID = RATES.DATEID.
I must to show as a pivot each rate by month for each year. Years must be showed as row heading and sorted descending (this already works) and Months must be showed as column's labels. Something like this:
----------|January|February|......|December|
2008 | 737.3 | 372.3 |......| 342.56 |
2007 | 346.2 | 456.6 |......| 678.78 |
The problem is Months always appear in Lexicographical order: April, August, December, ..., September. How can I to define the correct sort for Month ? Thanks in advance for your help.
Edited by: [email protected] on Sep 21, 2009 4:03 PM

Hi Vetsrini, thank you for your answer.
I've included an additional DATES table's field in query, and it contains the number of month, according to your suggestion. Results for query show month's names in proper form, but when I set up the pivot table from template builder and get preview for results (pdf, html, etc), I still get month's names in Lexicographical order. All the examples and documentation tips (sorting tags and others) I've found seems to apply to normal tables, because none of that works in my pivot table. Any other ideas are welcome.

Error in displaying two pivot tables side by side

I am creating two pivot tables. They work fine when one after the other. BI Publisher gives an error if I place them side by side.
One more issue. If i use this "for-eachCOLUMN0end" I get the following:
Balances with Central Bank
Cash and Cash-equivalent Securities
Inter-bank Deposits
Cash
Asset-backed Securities Assets
I want to just display any one of these, say Cash. How do I achieve that?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Varun

The method has to diplay two boxes side-by side, as if they were sitting on the ground next to each other. The first box's character is the number 1. It has a height of 3, a length of 8 and has to sit six spaces from the left side of the page and be completely filled in. The second box sits six paces from the first, it has a height of 8, a length of 5 and the character has to be the number 2. This is filled in as well.
I understand I would have to build on the method. How would I go about formulating a plan to do this. The program is a textmode device, like a printer prints from left to right.
Thanks for reply

2 Column Label side to side in Pivot Table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for