2 concurrent VPN connections

ISP: Comast Broadband
LinkSys Wireless Router: SRX200 (WRT54GX2)
PCs: 2 Dell laptops, D410 & D600
PC Connections: Each laptop works wired or wirelessly to access Internet
Problem statement: When my wife an dI both work from home, we can only maintain 1 VPN connection. Upon initiating a VPN connection from the 2nd laptop, the 1st laptop's connection is disabled.
Goal: We would like to be able to connect to our work VPN and work remotely concurrently. Is this possible?

It is definitely possible - we do it all the time.
The first thing I would check for is that each PC gets a distinct IP.
Maybe your DHCP settings only allow for one IP. Like when the first and the last IP in the range are the same number: 192.168.1.100 as an example.
If you do get individual IP's, then it may be something to do with the VPN settings. Do you both connect to the same VPN, or two different ones? If it's the same, it may be that their server only allows one VPN per Internet IP, so that's not a router problem.

Similar Messages

Is there a limit to the number of concurrent L2TP/IPSec VPN connections in Snow Leopard

Hi,
I'm currently running an L2TP/IPSec service from a Snow Leopard server VM running on the latest version of Lion Server ( Had loads of issues with Lion VPN connectivity from outside our network when I first upgraded the physical server to Lion. quickest way to get the service back was to run an S/L VM. I know that there have been some changes to Lion in the VPN area, but this works... sort of;;;)
I've got an IP address pool of 20 addresses confgured as this is only for ICT staff members. Each user has a local userid/password on the S/L server. For me, things just work.
iPhone, iPad, OS X lion client they all work and I've had about 3 simultaneous connections up and running.However, the majority of staff users use Windows 7 client machines and they're been reporting sporadic connection failures where one moment they can get connected and the next they can't. I'm currently wondring if there is some concurrent limit setting they are hitting and are getting slung off because I've got other users using the service. It would be a bit strange if S/L can only support 2 or 3 connections out of the box.
Then again it might be VMWare Fusion (Vsn 4.1.1) thats the problem.
Any help apppreciated
Rgds
Alex

You have to count to have about 30GB at least free on the startup disk, after you have the library loaded.
On the external you have space enough.
As far as I know there is no limit for iPhoto, but I suggest to not let it grow too much, because everything will become sluggish, also making backups. It should be possible to split up in more libraries, one that is really actual and one that is the past. Physical splitting up I mean, not smart collections. You can switch libraries by holding the Alt(option) at startup of iPhoto.

Limited number of 5 concurrent VPN (ipsec/l2tp) connections to OSX Server

We've configured OS X 10.6 Server on XServe to accept VPN connections either via PPTP or via IPSEC/L2TP using a PreSharedKey.
When multiple clients try to connect using IPSec/L2TP, we experience problems as soon as 5 users are connected. No additional ipsec/l2tp connections can be created until one of the 5 existing connections is terminated, but then a new connection can start immediately.
Sniffing with tcpdump, the following can be seen on the server side:
09:24:45.349541 IP clientIP.isakmp > serverIP.isakmp: isakmp: phase 1 I ident
09:24:45.354978 IP serverIP.isakmp > clientIP.isakmp: isakmp: phase 1 R ident
09:24:45.358233 IP clientIP.isakmp > serverIP.isakmp: isakmp: phase 1 I ident[E]
09:24:45.365359 IP serverIP.isakmp > clientIP.isakmp: isakmp: phase 1 R ident[E]
09:24:45.367222 IP clientIP.isakmp > serverIP.isakmp: isakmp: phase 2/others I oakley-quick[E]
09:24:47.365936 IP clientIP.isakmp > serverIP.isakmp: isakmp: phase 2/others I oakley-quick[E]
09:24:50.365799 IP clientIP.isakmp > serverIP.isakmp: isakmp: phase 2/others I oakley-quick[E]
The last lines are repeated several times, until the connection attempt times out.
When using PPTP connections, we don't experience these problems, and in addition PPTP connections can even be created when 5 ipsec/l2tp connections are already established.
Does anyone know if there is some kind of limitation for the number of concurrent ipsec/l2tp connections built into OS X server? So far, we have not seen anything like this in the docs.

Ok, IMAP server almost universally allow multiple connections. Thunderbird as you would have observed uses 5 if they are available. As Airmail suggested, iphones just use more and more until they exhaust the available connections. There is no set maximum option.
However there are other things that can consume connections and some may surprise you.
Anti spam tools such as mail washer
Anti virus programs in their anti spam or anti phishing roles
Web mail.
The wife sharing the same account on her laptop.
That is from the top of my head. So could any of those apply.

Mac Pro refuses to establish a vpn connection

Hello out there...
I have a 6 month old Mac Pro. Unfortunately this computer refuses to establish a reliable vpn connection to my office. All the other gear I have (powerBook, iPad and iPhone) does it.
The Mac Pro is erratic. Sometimes he connects but then all of a sudden after two or three minutes the vpn connection is beeing closed. The other day it works for hours....
He did so before the system upgrade and does it now after the upgrade to 10.6.8
I am realy desperate to get a solution for that....
All the best
Peter

Hi Kris,
The ASA supports different kinds of VPN, i.e. SSL (aka SVC for Ssl Vpn Client), IPsec or L2TP/IPsec.
For IPsec it suports both IKEv1 and IKEv2 (as of version 8.4).
On the client side,
the legacy Cisco VPN client uses IPsec with IKEv1.
Anyconnect 2.x uses SSL.
Anyconnect 3.x can use either SSL or IPsec/IKEv2.
So the Cisco clients do not use L2TP, but L2TP functionality is built-in in some OS's, like Windows and Android.
Personally I have not had the opportunity yet to lay my hands on an Android device to try this out, so I hope Michael or the people in the other thread can help you out if you need more details.
As to what's different, that's a short question with a long answer
One important difference between SSL and IPsec is that at some places IPsec may not work because the network provider blocks UDP500, while SSL uses TCP443 which is usually not blocked because it's the standard port for HTTPS.
Another one is that for Anyconnect, you need a license on the ASA (it does include a free license for 2 concurrent users).
Just a few pointers:
And probably Wikipedia is a good place to start reading as well if you want the full picture
hth
Herbert

Hi there, I am trying to connect to my server at work from home using a vpn connection. It connects fine and the time ticks along, but when i click go - connect to server, it comes up with connection failed. Please help!

Hi there, I am trying to connect to my server at work from home using a vpn connection. It connects fine and the time ticks along, but when i click go - connect to server, it comes up with connection failed. Please help!

... when i click go - connect to server, it comes up with connection failed.
If you're trying to connect to a Bonjour server on the remote network, that won't work over a layer 3 VPN. Use something like Hamachi or one of the SSH-tunnelling Bonjour proxy apps for that.

Window 8.1 system unable to access network shares via VPN connection

Is there something inherent to Windows 8.1 that prevents it from accessing shares on a domain?
I know that it cannot join a domain, but does that also mean that it cannot access shares which are on a domain?
My problem is that I have several user that are running windows 8.1 that are connecting to our network via a VPN.
The users have domain accounts but their computers as windows 8.1 cannot joined to the domain.
So to access network shares they have to use their domain credentials to create a VPN connection.
Once connected the user can RDP to systems on the domain using their domain accounts, so I know that their user names/passwords and permissions are correct. They can access these systems using the computer name, so I don't feel that I have a DNS issue.
They can see the shares on our file server, but when they try to access their departments shared file, they receive an access denied message. There are a few shares that are completely wide open, shared to all users and all departments but they cannot access
those shares either.
You can ping the file server, from the the client when they are connected to the VPN but you just cannot access any of the shares.
So...
I am thinking that it has something to do with windows 8.1 and not being able to join a domain, but I cannot find anything to explicitly support this thought.
Other users running a variety different OS (windows 7, OSX, Linux) can all access the shares without any problems via the VPN, so I am a little stumped.

I have done some more testing and oddly enough I can map a drive if I use the IPaddress, but not the computer name, when checking the check box "connect using different credentials"and providing they users domain credentials.
This seems to point to a DNS issue, one would think, but I can hit the file share server by name \\fileserver.dev.lan
I can see all the shares, so dns seems to be fine right?
So I don't understand why I can map a drive using do the IPaddress and not the machine name, but yet I can see and ping the server by name?
When I try to create a mapped drive by machine name I receive the following message:
Windows cannot access \\fileserver.dev.lan\all
You do not have permissions to access \\fileserver.dev.lan. contact your network administrator to request access.
But if I use the \\x.x.x.x\all using the very same user and password I get connected with no problem.
This only seems to happen on windows 8.1, which leads me to think that has something to do with OS.
I am thinking about upgrading to windows 8.1 pro, but I don't want to go though the hassle and expanse is the OS is not the problem.

How can i use an existing vpn connection without using the option "Send all traffic over vpn connection"?

I have been trying to get my computer (os x.7) to astablish a remote desktop connection to my work computer via a vpn tunnel. In fact I have just discovered that it works fine if i select to "send all traffic over vpn connection" from the options in the advanced setup of the vpn.
If the option is selected microsofts "Remote desktop connection for mac" works just fine. However without selecting the option it is not taking advantage of the tunnel but tries to connect as if the tunnel would not exist.
Now the question is how do I get program to use the vpn tunnel without checking the above option?
Thanks for any hints and pointers.

Then can her computer be authorized to both accounts?
Absolutely. You can authorize any given computer to up to five iTunes Store accounts.
If purchases are made on her account, to a computer authorized to my account, can I put those songs on my iPod?
If you connect your iPod to her computer, yes. Tracks download only to the computer from which they're purchased, regardless of which iTunes Store account is used for the purchase. Or you could copy the tracks from her computer to yours and then authorize your computer to her iTunes Store account. But that's sort of defeating the original purpose, it would seem to me.
is it better to buy music through Amazon downloads and/or actually purchasing CDs to avoid the security features iTunes puts on its music?
That's certainly an option. If it's an entire album I want, I buy CDs. That way I can import them at the quality I want and to whichever of my systems I want. Amazon or one of the other download stores that offer tracks as MP3 are also an option, though for me download stores are best when you just want a couple of tracks off a given CD.

Warning: Lenovo system update 5.1 corrupts VPN connection

In MS Windows 8 networking forum are discussed many VPNs problems, when installing 3rd party software.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w8itpronetworking/threads
After installing Lenovo system update 5.01 my VPN connection stopped working. Returning to restore point helped not.
Jiří Cvrk
TP YOGA S1 .. X220, X61, T22, ms w8nd8ws

It was quite simple.
I was connected to VPN.
I upgraded Lenovo system update in two steps.
I can´t connect to VPN anymore.
Jiří Cvrk
TP YOGA S1 .. X220, X61, T22, ms w8nd8ws

Copy from AFP share to AFP share (via VPN-Connection) - stupid?

Hi there
We set up an OS X server in a remote facility and are connecting to it over a VPN connection (Netgear Firewall).
Everything works fine, there's only one annoying issue: if I want to copy a file from a mounted AFP share (share1) to another mounted AFP share (share2) - both of them residing on the same server - it seems to me that the files are being copied first to my local client and then back to the server again - instead of being copied directly from and to the server...
Is there anything I can do about this issue or am I wrong? Is this a so called "feature" of the Finder itself?
Thanks for any suggestions and regards
Roman

Thanks for your thoughts about higher vs. lower latency networking - I totally agree. It might be a quite uncommon setup; as the server is being "housed" in a datacenter with quite tough restrictions: not only do they charge us for the power consumption, but also for the traffic being generated - which is 250 GB a month. They're providing an uplink with 10mbps (guaranteed), burstable to 100mbits.
Anyway, we're interested in keeping traffic low - hard to do if we cannot let end users do "common" tasks like moving files from one folder to another (of course, its a sharepoint - but they don't care).
What I'm looking for? Well, I think it will take hours to find out which part of the setup (AFP implementation of the server, AFP on the local machines, either of them on a particular version, the Finder in general...) actually might be responsible for this behavior. And maybe there's a "solution" (if you agree that this is actually a problem" buried somewhere
Regards
Roman

ASA 5505 VPN Connection Issue

Good morning everyone,
At my last position I was IT Director whose area of expertise was database and application development. All of the company's networking planning and maintainence I entrusted to my sysadmin, Salvadore. Back in 2004 we began implementing major changes in the network. Salvadore recommended SonicWALL firewalls. He did a fantastic job of securing our valuable server assets. Among the many improvements Salvadore established VPN access to the datacenter assets for mobile employees. What I remember especially well was the ease-of-use: start the VPN Client then RDP to a server or connect with SQL Server, in addition to connecting to all devices on my home network. It was absolutely beautiful!
Fast forward to today. I have since retired. I do a little bit of daytrading on the side for entertainment. I leased a dedicated server to run an application that runs continuously 24 hours a day, 5 days a week. I contacted Salvadore to do a security audit on the server. As expected the server was under constant assault by bots trying to hack the RDP port. Salvadore recommended a firewall. The datacenter host offered us two choices of Cisco firewalls, one of which we chose: ASA 5505.
Today I have a secure server which pleases me. The one thing that bothers me however is that I lose access to my home network devices while the VPN Client is connected. Here are the symptoms:
I cannot send an email with Outlook as I normally do by relaying off of my Internet provider's SMTP server.
I cannot connect to the TradeStation servers with my TradeStation application using login credentials that are authorized for my home network only.
I cannot access my Seagate network storage drive.
This is what I discovered:
My wireless adapter (which I use from this laptop) identifies itself as "Wireless LAN adapter Wireless Network Connection" in IPCONFIG. IPv4 address is 192.168.0.5. Default Gateway: 192.168.0.1.
After I connect the VPN Client, IPCONFIG reports a new adapter: "Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2". IPv4 address is 10.0.10.4. Default Gateway: 10.0.10.1.
When I launch Windows Task Manager and click on the Networking tab, I see those two adapters.
When launch IE and go to bandwidthplace.com to run a test, I see all of the network traffic going over "Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2".
When I disconnect VPN and then rerun the bandwidth test, I see that all of the network traffic now goes over "Wireless LAN adapter Wireless Network Connection".
This explains all of the symptoms:
My Internet Provider will only allow me to relay off of their email servers if I am connected to their network.
TradeStation refuses connection to their network because my credentials do not match my network address.
There is no Seagate network storage device on the remote server network.
My questions to the Cisco Support Community are:
Is this the best I can hope for?
Must all traffic be routed through the VPN connection?
Is there any way to route traffic destined for 10.0.*.* through VPN and everything else through the default connection?
Thank you everyone for your help. I would be happy to provide additional detailed information.

Hi Brian,
you can route traffic destined to 10.0.*.* over the VPN and keep normal internet traffic unencrypted over the default connection - this setup is known as VPN Split Tunnelling.
This doc shows how to setup the access control list and apply this to the tunnel policy.
Hope this helps
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080702999.shtml

How can I use VPN connection to access my Outlook email?

My company doesn't support iPhone's so I can't get any help from them -- here is my problem:
We run Outlook 2003 and they won't tell me the server name for Outlook. I have been able to connect to our Cisco VPN and access internal webpages, etc. Is there anyway I can use this VPN connection to retrieve my Outlook email?
Or is there anyway I can identify the server name I need to allow the iphone to connect to my Outlook?
Any help would be much appreciated.

Yes, it is possible to connect via VPN. However,if IT hasn't set up ActiveSync on the internal Exchange server, this won't work anyway.
The server name for your Exchange server is in the configuration of Outlook, so you can find it and use that to connect. But that doesn't mean that things are set up correctly to have this work.
To find your server name, (this is for Outlook 2007), Tools->Options and double-click on the account under the Email tab. The server name is next to "Microsoft Exchange server" on that screen.

ASA 5510 Anyconnect VPN question-"Hairpin" vpn connection on same external interface

I have a Cisco ASA 5510, I want to allow a VPN connection to be established by a client on one of the inside interfaces(10.20.x.x) to be able to go out the single External interface and get authenticated by the ASA to create a VPN tunnel to the other inside interface (10.0.X.X) and access resources on that subnet.
Basically want clients on a WLAN to be able to VPN back in to the LAN with the ASA in the middle to get to company resources,
Is this possible?
Thanks,
Tommy

When we connect any VPN on a device then it is always a TO THE DEVICE connection and I am afraid we can connect only to the local / nearest interface where user is connected in a network with respect to ASA.
I have seen this scenario working though earlier with one of my clients wherein he has configured his DNS server accordingly so that depending upon the source of the DNS request an appropriate IP address was provided for same DNS name. For example if user from IP address range 192.168.0.0 range connects to abc.com then it will get IP address 192.168.1.1 and if a user from range IP address10.0.0.0 connects then it will get 10.1.1.1.
If we configure the same scenario as well then your requirement will be fulfiled with same name however VPN has to be enabled on wireless interface again. If not, then as you have described configuring a new domain name for VPN connection only for wireless users should do the deal.
Regards,
Anuj

ASA 5505 vpn connection issues

Hello I am having some issues with getting my vpn connection working on a new site. I get no internet connection when hooking up the asa. My current config is below. I have included a packet trace from my remote site to my main site. Any help would be appriciated, I am not very experanced in coniguring the devices.
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name .com
enable password w3iW.W8jLtqmhFnt encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 72.xxx.xx.xx 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
interface Ethernet0/1
interface Ethernet0/2
interface Ethernet0/3
interface Ethernet0/4
interface Ethernet0/5
interface Ethernet0/6
interface Ethernet0/7
ftp mode passive
dns server-group DefaultDNS
domain-name .com
access-list NONATACL extended permit ip 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.1.1.0 255.2
55.255.0
access-list VPNACL extended permit ip 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.1.1.0 255.255
.255.0
access-list OUTSIDEACL extended permit icmp any any
pager lines 24
logging asdm informational
mtu inside 1500
mtu outside 1500
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
asdm image disk0:/flash
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 0 access-list NONATACL
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
access-group OUTSIDEACL in interface outside
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
http server enable
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside
http 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.255 inside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
crypto ipsec transform-set ESPDESMD5 esp-des esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
crypto map VPNMAP 13 match address VPNACL
crypto map VPNMAP 13 set peer 68.xx.xxx.xxx
crypto map VPNMAP 13 set transform-set ESPDESMD5
crypto map VPNMAP interface outside
crypto isakmp identity address
crypto isakmp enable outside
crypto isakmp policy 13
authentication pre-share
encryption des
hash md5
group 2
lifetime 86400
telnet 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 inside
telnet 192.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 outside
telnet timeout 5
ssh timeout 5
console timeout 0
dhcpd dns 192.1.1.6 192.1.1.4
dhcpd wins 192.1.1.6 192.1.1.4
dhcpd ping_timeout 750
dhcpd domain .com
dhcpd auto_config outside
dhcpd address 10.10.10.10-10.10.10.40 inside
dhcpd enable inside
threat-detection basic-threat
threat-detection statistics access-list
no threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept
webvpn
tunnel-group 76.xxx.xxx.xx type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group 76.xxx.xxx.xx ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *
tunnel-group 68.xx.xxx.xxx type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group 68.xx.xxx.xxx ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum 512
policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect dns preset_dns_map
inspect ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect h323 ras
inspect rsh
inspect rtsp
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect skinny
inspect sunrpc
inspect xdmcp
inspect sip
inspect netbios
inspect tftp
service-policy global_policy global
prompt hostname context
Cryptochecksum:229af8a14b475d91b876176163124158
: end
ciscoasa(config)#reciated

Hello Belnet,
What do the logs show from the ASA.
Can you post them ??
Any other question..Sure..Just remember to rate all of the community answers.
Julio

Dual Remote VPN Connection

Hello Guys
i created three different Remote VPN connections with three different networks . i can make them one but for some reasons i don't mix all.
and iam using Cisco asa 5505 with Shrew Soft VPN software , so my problem is
- i connected Shrew soft remote vpn , if i try to connected another remote vpn connection this will not accept the second connection , so please can any one give me a remote vpn connection software that accepts more than one connection

Hi,
Since you mention the ASA and the VPN I presume you are trying to connect by VPN Client to the same ASA?
Why would you want to have several VPN client connections at the same time? (Though I think that isnt even possible)
What are you trying to accomplish by these 3 different VPN Client configurations configured on the same ASA?
Isnt it just possible to configure one VPN Client connection to the ASA that would handle all the traffic of these 3 VPN Client connections?
- Jouni

Cisco ASA 5505 Remote Access IP/Sec VPN Connectivity Issues

We have a Cisco ASA that we use just for Remote Access VPN. It uses UDP and was working fine for about 2 months. Recently clients have had intermittent issues when connecting from home. The following message is display by the Cisco VPN Client :
"Secure VPN connection terminated locally by the Client. Reason 412: The remote peer is no longer responding"
Upon looking at a client side packet capture, I notice that no response is being given back to the client for the udp packets sent to the ASA on udp 500. If I login to the ASA from the LAN and send a single ping FROM the ASA, then the client can connect without issue. I don't understand the significance of the needed outbound ping since ping is not used by the client to test if the ASA is alive.
Once again this is a remote access udp ip/sec VPN. I set most of it up with the VPN wizard and then backed up the config. The issue started happening at least a month after setup (maybe two) and I restored to the saved config just in-case, but the issue remains.
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
I'm using IOS 831 and have tried 821 and 823 as one thread that I found recommended downgraded to 821.
Thanks much,
Justin

Javier,
I logged into the ASA last time the VPN went down. I issued the following commands:
debug crypto isakmp 190
debug crypto ipsec 190
capture outside-cap interface outside match udp any any
I then used a remote access tool to access the client and tried to connect. I got absolutely nothing from debugging. So I issued the following command:
show capture outside | include 500
and also got nothing. So I issued the following command:
ping 4.2.2.2
Upon which my normal deug messaged began to showup, so I issued the show capture outside command again and recieved the expected output below:
   1: 15:44:18.570160 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 868
   2: 15:44:18.579269 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1151: udp 444
   3: 15:44:18.703866 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 172
   4: 15:44:18.706567 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1151: udp 76
   5: 15:44:18.831499 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 92
   6: 15:44:19.024061 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1151: udp 76
   7: 15:44:19.111963 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 60
   8: 15:44:19.517185 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 204
   9: 15:44:19.521350 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 92
10: 15:44:19.522723 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1151: udp 252
11: 15:44:42.121957 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 868
12: 15:44:42.130822 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 444
13: 15:44:42.228397 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 172
14: 15:44:42.231036 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 76
15: 15:44:42.329557 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 92
16: 15:44:42.521091 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 76
17: 15:44:42.610167 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 60
18: 15:44:42.649258 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 204
19: 15:44:42.653790 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 252
20: 15:44:42.789342 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 1036
21: 15:44:42.792119 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 92
22: 15:44:42.800846 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 188
23: 15:44:42.892120 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 60
34: 15:44:54.446220 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 92
35: 15:44:54.447913 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 92
70: 15:45:01.825000 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.10000 > REMOTE_IP.10000: udp 100
174: 15:45:03.417764 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.10000 > REMOTE_IP.10000: udp 500
377: 15:45:07.881500 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.10000 > OFFICE_IP.10000: udp 100    1: 15:44:18.570160 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 868
   2: 15:44:18.579269 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1151: udp 444
   3: 15:44:18.703866 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 172
   4: 15:44:18.706567 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1151: udp 76
   5: 15:44:18.831499 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 92
   6: 15:44:19.024061 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1151: udp 76
   7: 15:44:19.111963 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 60
   8: 15:44:19.517185 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 204
   9: 15:44:19.521350 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1151 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 92
10: 15:44:19.522723 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1151: udp 252
11: 15:44:42.121957 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 868
12: 15:44:42.130822 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 444
13: 15:44:42.228397 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 172
14: 15:44:42.231036 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 76
15: 15:44:42.329557 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 92
16: 15:44:42.521091 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 76
17: 15:44:42.610167 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 60
18: 15:44:42.649258 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 204
19: 15:44:42.653790 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 252
20: 15:44:42.789342 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 1036
21: 15:44:42.792119 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 92
22: 15:44:42.800846 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 188
23: 15:44:42.892120 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 60
34: 15:44:54.446220 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.1155 > OFFICE_IP.500: udp 92
35: 15:44:54.447913 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.500 > REMOTE_IP.1155: udp 92
70: 15:45:01.825000 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.10000 > REMOTE_IP.10000: udp 100
174: 15:45:03.417764 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 OFFICE_IP.10000 > REMOTE_IP.10000: udp 500
377: 15:45:07.881500 802.1Q vlan#2 P0 REMOTE_IP.10000 > OFFICE_IP.10000: udp 100
It would seem as if no traffic reached the ASA until some outbound traffic to an arbitrary public IP. In this case I sent an echo request to a public DNS server. It seems almost like a state-table issue although I don't know how ICMP ties in.
Once again, any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Justin

2 concurrent VPN connections

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for