2 gwia's 1 Post office

Hello all:
Our ISP, Verizon Business, can be unreliable at times. The T1 circuit seems to go down during heavy rain storms, before heavy rain storms, and once every 3 months.
For fault tolerance, the plan is to add another gwia to our Post Office via another ISP . We are thinking that if the first line goes down, the MX record will point to the second gwia and we should be ok for email.
We are still on GW7.03. Are there any hicups to note with this setup? Any pointers (other than moving to Unix or GW8) to offer?
Thanks

Originally Posted by EBSR_PARAMEDIC
Hello all:
Our ISP, Verizon Business, can be unreliable at times. The T1 circuit seems to go down during heavy rain storms, before heavy rain storms, and once every 3 months.
For fault tolerance, the plan is to add another gwia to our Post Office via another ISP . We are thinking that if the first line goes down, the MX record will point to the second gwia and we should be ok for email.
We are still on GW7.03. Are there any hicups to note with this setup? Any pointers (other than moving to Unix or GW8) to offer?
Thanks
It depends... Is your current GWIA on "the inside" or directly connected to the internet?
if you are NAT'ing an outside address from your providers to the GWIA, there is not a direct need to add a second GIWA. Just make sure the outside IP of you second internet connections has a NAT for the SMTP port pointing to your GIWA.
Make sure they add the second ip record to the outside MX record of your mail exchange domain, and that should be set.
You can setup your GWIA to smart relay to more than one address. Just add the two outgoing addresses (a space to separate them) on the GWIA's outbound host. That should let the GWIA use the first one until if fails and then fall back to using the second one. (As found here : Novell Documentation)
One thing to watch could be the outside IP on your second internet line and if it matches the FQDN name your GWIA is reporting. If those two don't match up according to the internet DNS records, your mail might be dropped as it is seen as possible spam attempt. So I'd advise to give the failover a good test before counting on it fully working when needed.
Cheers,
Willem

Similar Messages

  • Clean up after post office deletion

    I deleted a post office from a GW 8.02 server running mta, gwia, and one other post office. When it asked me if I wanted to delete file system for that po, I said yes. However when it attempted to delete the files it gave an error saying they would have to be cleaned up manually. The objects deleted fine and the system is otherwise ok but when I run rcgrpwise status I still see the old post office listed there as unused. My assumption is that I need to clean up gwha.conf by removing the old post office from the list and then remove the file system for the old post office. Is that all there is to it?
    Thanks for any assistance.
    Dan

    Hey Dan,
    Originally Posted by dlietz
    The hypervisor is esxi 5.1. I just built the groupwise server vm, so right now it just has SLES 11.3 on it - I was planning to go away from OES since Groupwise no longer uses eDir objects. My plan was to go with ext3 for the file system.
    Sure, that's a valid reasoning and ext3 should work fine. One could probably debate using XFS over ext3 when looking at native Linux filesystems for GroupWise.
    One thing I normally do set when using ext3, besides the notaime parameter, is the time dependent check. I usually set that to 12 months. It's very annoying (and time consuming) to have the disk check kick in during a planned reboot.
    Originally Posted by dlietz
    ... What I've read so far seems to indicate I can copy the entire Groupwise system to the new VM and point the upgrade process to the domain and post office and it will upgrade it. Is that correct?
    Yes, correct. It is important to make sure the basic agent configuration is in working order (meaning the http pages for the agents have been enabled and LDAP server configuration and eDirectory sync is all set correctly and in working order before doing the upgrade). Even when moving from eDir, it's nice to have the upgrade routine be able to reconfigure those LDAP and sync bits correctly for 2014 before moving to a new directory.
    Originally Posted by dlietz
    So I'm thinking:
    1. Patch current Groupwise to 8.03
    You could do, but I don't see the need. You'll be moving to the 2014 anyway... 8.03 does nothing extra for that upgrade process.
    Originally Posted by dlietz
    2. Upgrade Datasychronizer server from sles11sp2 to sles11sp3
    3. Upgrade Datasychronizer software to Groupwise Mobility Server 2.0 (At this point I would have to reconnect to old post office?)
    Sure, though I'd not 2.01 can be applied directly as upgrade on your current 1.x Mobility system. Do make sure you set a snapshot on the VM before the upgrade (with the VM tunred off) and leave it long enough, a week or so, until you have checked and double checked all is working on the 2.01 system. That way it's easy enough to roll back to 1.x if needed.
    Originally Posted by dlietz
    4. Copy Groupwise system to new server using db copy in multiple passes with a final pass when groupwise is offline and run upgrade process.
    Yep, and if the current filesystem is NSS... make sure to run it with the migrate (-m) option so the lowercase conversion runs with it.
    Originally Posted by dlietz
    I was also considering separating Webaccess and Calendar Publishing to separate server since Webaccess is no longer part of the Groupwise server install.
    Absolutely, and I'd also place that Webaccess/Calendar Publishing server in a DMZ if you have it. All that's needed with the 2012/2014 version is access to the SOAP port on the POA(s).
    Cheers,
    Willem

  • Error 8f03 starting post office

    I created a new post office on a SLES10sp3/OES2sp3 server already running the primary domain, gwia, another po and webaccess. But I'm having a problem getting it to start using the poa startup file. Here's the text from the console:
    srv1:/opt/novell/groupwise/agents/bin # ./gwpoa --show --home @hsstudpo.poa &
    [1] 12179
    Warning: Running as root
    srv1:/opt/novell/groupwise/agents/bin # An invalid configuration option was detected (8F03).
    Command Line Option: media/nss/VOL1/grpwise/hsstudpo
    A required file or directory is missing (DF10).
    home/wphost.db.
    [1]+ Done ./gwpoa --show --home @hsstudpo.poa
    The home switch in the hsstudpo.poa file looks like this:
    --home /media/nss/VOL1/grpwise/hsstudpo
    The POA will start just fine if I use the command:
    srv1:/opt/novell/groupwise/agents/bin # ./gwpoa --show --home /media/nss/VOL1/grpwise/hsstudpo &
    I've tried shortening the path to the post office thinking maybe it was some weirdness with the 8 character issue, but that didn't make a difference.
    I'm stumped.
    The only thing I can think of that may be causing this is when I first created the PO object in C1, I forgot to change the POA type from Netware to Linux. I have since fixed that however. Would a domain rebuild be required?
    Thanks for any assistance.
    Dan

    dlietz,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://forums.novell.com/

  • Configuring Contacts (External Domain/Post Office/User)

    We're starting a migration to another mail system. I'm looking for some help to properly configure our GW8sp2hp2 system to send mail to external recipients, whether the mail is sent from an internal GroupWise user or from an Internet sender somewhere outside our network. All external recipients will have the same SMTP domain name. The TIDs I found (7004434, 3230787) for creating an External Domain, External Post Office, and External User to create "Contacts" in the GroupWise system address book that point to external Internet e-mail addresses did not work. I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong, the instructions are incomplete, or the process has changed for GW8.
    We have GW8sp2hp2 with the exception of a WebAccess and GWIA that are both at 7sp4. There are two GWIAs, one for inbound in the DMZ (7sp4) and one for outbound (8sp2hp2). One TID I read said to link the External Post Office to the domain holding the GWIA using the Link Configuration tool. The inbound GWIA has a Gateway Alias Type of "GWIA", but the outbound GWIA did not have one defined. I made its Gateway Alias Type "GWI2". I can go to GroupWise|Gateway Aliases in the properties of the External User and add a gateway alias for either GWIA, however I cannot see GWI2 in the Gateway Link drop-down in the Link Configuration tool to select the second GWIA as the Gateway link (per TID 3230787).
    Are there GroupWise 8-specific instructions for configuring this?

    I added a Gateway Alias of [email protected] to the user and now the inbound GWIA accepts mail to that address and immediately forwards the mail through the outbound GWIA to the address configured in Internet Addressing. My remaining issue is that I want it to work for Internet mail addressed to [email protected] AND [email protected] I created a second External User and gave it a gateway alias of [email protected] but the same Internet Address, and that appears to work, but is complicated. GroupWise documentation says nicknames are not the solution, as mail cannot be addressed to [email protected]
    It appears I've found a solution, albeit a slightly complicated one. But if Gateway Aliases are deprecated and nicknames aren't the answer, what is the supported solution for making this work?

  • [9505] Your Post Office is Unavailable.

    Recently migrated Groupwise 2012 services from a single box to a split system with PO, Domain, and Monitor on one box and the GWIA, Webaccess & secondary domain on the second box. All seems well, except *some* users (not all, only a handful) are receiving the following message when logging into webaccess:
    [9505] Your Post Office is Unavailable. The Post Office Agent might not be configured for SOAP. Please contact your system administrator.
    Checking the webaccess logs reveals the following error:
    8:11:43, <SOAP>, -, INFO, [username], Login
    8:11:43, <SOAP>, -, INFO, [username], Unable to connect to the POA @ http://10.1.10.35:7191/soap
    10.1.10.35 is the IP of the previous POA - the new POA is 10.1.10.135
    SOAP appears to be configured properly and other users are not having any problems. Why just these users?
    Thanks!

    IP is correct in the webacc.cfg file - though not sure why the last line is commented out. Again, only some users are affected.
    Provider.SOAP.1.ip=10.1.10.135
    Provider.SOAP.1.port=7191
    #Provider.SOAP.1.url=/soap
    Checked the TID 7012354. There was no garbage character that I could see, but the Display Name in the General Options was entirely blank. I put the user's Display Name in the field and restarted Webaccess and that user can login now. Wow. Weird.
    I then tried another user that was getting the same error - turns out that user's Display Name is blank as well (I didn't make any changes), but it didn't matter - they could log in to webaccess fine - so now wondering if restarting webaccess was all that was needed in the first place? It's not making much sense. Why is this only happening to a few users? Why do some users have a blank display name under those general options? I only enabled the POP3 & IMAP online settings for those specific users and then checked via their client for the Account settings. Looks to be a tough setting to verify for 2000+ users if it can only be accessed via the user's client login.
    I went back and unchecked the POP3 & IMAP Online setting for those users and restarted webaccess... everything still appears ok. so just weird.
    Will have to monitor for additional user complaints - otherwise, looks now.
    Thanks!

  • Post Office exiting on glibc error

    My Post Office keeps unloading unexpectedly. We are running GW 2012 SP1 on Suse 10 SP3 and OES 2.0.3. Nothing gets written to the logs, but it crashed when I had an active SSH session open and it wrote the following to the console.
    *** glibc detected *** /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/bin/gwpoa: free(): invalid next size (normal): 0xe86ca830 ***
    ======= Backtrace: =========
    ../lib/libc.so.6[0xf60caa51]
    ../lib/libc.so.6(__libc_free+0x84)[0xf60cc124]
    /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6(_ZdlPv+0x21)[0xf628b2b1]
    /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6(_ZdaPv+0x1d)[0xf628b30d]
    /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/lib/libinetpack.so(_ZN11NgwRmWriterD1Ev+0x37)[0xf66e59ed]
    /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/lib/libinetpack.so(_Z14GetSMTPMessageP19ngwgwia_contex t_recP16POP3_INFO_RECORDjj+0x648)[0xf6602b5c]
    /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/lib/libinetpack.so(_Z22NgwGwiaCheckConversionP19ngwgwi a_context_recjjjjPP7MM_VOID+0x81c)[0xf6621e06]
    /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/lib/libinetpack.so(_Z11ImapDoFetchP16imap_context_recP 15WRITE_BUFF_INFOPhPS3_jS3_P13svTCP_CONNBLKP17itcp _gets_context+0xc94)[0xf65edc4a]
    /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/lib/libinetpack.so(_Z18Imap4HandlerThreadP19ngwgwia_co ntext_recP13svTCP_CONNBLK+0x2d27)[0xf65fbd8f]
    /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/lib/libinetpack.so(NgwGwiaIMAPWork+0xd9)[0xf65fd289]
    /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/lib/libpoa.so(XmapHandler+0x5b3)[0xf75dd4a2]
    /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/lib/libpoa.so(TcpAXmapThrdHandler+0xb68)[0xf76bea65]
    /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/lib/libsvrtk.so(_NgwThrdCreate+0x40)[0xf69c5036]
    ../lib/libpthread.so.0[0xf605535b]
    ../lib/libc.so.6(__clone+0x5e)[0xf6126d1e]
    ======= Memory map: ========
    08048000-0809d000 r-xp 00000000 68:03 114288 /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/bin/gwpoa
    0809d000-080a8000 rwxp 00054000 68:03 114288 /opt/novell/groupwise/agents/bin/gwpoa
    080a8000-0a74d000 rwxp 080a8000 00:00 0 [heap]
    e1300000-e133a000 rwxp e1300000 00:00 0
    e133a000-e1400000 ---p e133a000 00:00 0
    e1500000-e1700000 rwxp e1500000 00:00 0
    e1700000-e1900000 rwxp e1700000 00:00 0
    e1900000-e1a00000 rwxp e1900000 00:00 0
    e1b00000-e1bff000 rwxp e1b00000 00:00 0
    e1bff000-e1c00000 ---p e1bff000 00:00 0
    e1d00000-e1f00000 rwxp e1d00000 00:00 0
    e1f00000-e2100000 rwxp e1f00000 00:00 0
    e2100000-e2300000 rwxp e2100000 00:00 0
    e2300000-e2400000 rwxp e2300000 00:00 0
    e2500000-e2600000 rwxp e2500000 00:00 0
    e2700000-e2900000 rwxp e2700000 00:00 0
    e2900000-e2a00000 rwxp e2900000 00:00 0
    e2b00000-e2d00000 rwxp e2b00000 00:00 0
    e2e00000-e2f00000 rwxp e2e00000 00:00 0
    e2f00000-e3100000 rwxp e2f00000 00:00 0
    e3100000-e3200000 rwxp e3100000 00:00 0
    e3200000-e32fe000 rwxp e3200000 00:00 0
    e32fe000-e3300000 ---p e32fe000 00:00 0
    e3300000-e3400000 rwxp e3300000 00:00 0
    e3500000-e3700000 rwxp e3500000 00:00 0
    e3700000-e38fe000 rwxp e3700000 00:00 0
    e38fe000-e3900000 ---p e38fe000 00:00 0
    e3900000-e3aff000 rwxp e3900000 00:00 0
    e3aff000-e3b00000 ---p e3aff000 00:00 0
    e3b00000-e3c00000 rwxp e3b00000 00:00 0
    e3d00000-e3f00000 rwxp e3d00000 00:00 0
    e3f00000-e3fff000 rwxp e3f00000 00:00 0
    e3fff000-e4000000 ---p e3fff000 00:00 0
    e4000000-e4100000 rwxp e4000000 00:00 0
    e4100000-e4300000 rwxp e4100000 00:00 0
    e4300000-e43ff000 rwxp e4300000 00:00 0
    e43ff000-e4400000 ---p e43ff000 00:00 0
    e4400000-e44ff000 rwxp e4400000 00:00 0
    e44ff000-e4500000 ---p e44ff000 00:00 0
    e4500000-e45fe000 rwxp e4500000 00:00 0
    e45fe000-e4600000 ---p e45fe000 00:00 0
    e4600000-e48f9000 rwxp e4600000 00:00 0
    e48f9000-e4900000 ---p e48f9000 00:00 0
    e4900000-e4cfc000 rwxp e4900000 00:00 0
    e4cfc000-e4d00000 ---p e4cfc000 00:00 0
    e4d00000-e4f00000 rwxp e4d00000 00:00 0
    e4f00000-e5100000 rwxp e4f00000 00:00 0
    e5100000-e5300000 rwxp e5100000 00:00 0
    e5300000-e53fd000 rwxp e5300000 00:00 0
    e53fd000-e5400000 ---p e53fd000 00:00 0
    e5400000-e54ff000 rwxp e5400000 00:00 0
    e54ff000-e5500000 ---p e54ff000 00:00 0
    e5500000-e55fe000 rwxp e5500000 00:00 0
    e55fe000-e5600000 ---p e55fe000 00:00 0
    e5600000-e56fe000 rwxp e5600000 00:00 0
    e56fe000-e5700000 ---p e56fe000 00:00 0
    e5700000-e57fd000 rwxp e5700000 00:00 0
    e57fd000-e5800000 ---p e57fd000 00:00 0
    e5800000-e5900000 rwxp e5800000 00:00 0
    e5900000-e59fd000 rwxp e5900000 00:00 0
    e59fd000-e5a00000 ---p e59fd000 00:00 0
    e5a00000-e5b00000 rwxp e5a00000 00:00 0
    e5b00000-e5c00000 rwxp e5b
    Anyone have any ideas what is happening here.
    Thanks,
    Dan

    Hi,
    Looks like its blowing up processing a POP / IMAP request. Usually the GWIA will bite it, unusual to see the POA die.
    Obvious advice: apply latest Gropwise 2012 code ( SP2 )
    Questions: Are you doing IMAP and POP via the GWIA or via the POA directly? How frequently are you seeing this?
    -- Bob

  • IMAP Issue connecting Archiver to Post Office

    I am running a GroupWise 8 sp2 hp2 system. I am trying to connect our new Barracuda Message archiver to all of my 30 post offices. Most run on Windows 2003 servers, but I have to that run on Linux. One is SLES 10 sp4, the other is SLES 11 sp 1. The one on 11 connects to the message archiver correct, as well as all 28 windows server post offices. The one that I have on the sles 10 box doesn't . This box also runs my primary domain, and gwia and webaccess on it. The msg archiver uses imap an soap to connect to the poa. All are turned on the poa. IMAP is not running on the gwia located on the box, so it shouldn't be a conflict. When I try to connect to the poa from the message archiver I see the following message in the poa log:
    10:16:41 016 New IMAP session initiated from ::ffff:10.2.1.124
    10:16:41 016 Return from IMAP [890F]
    10.2.1.124 is the address of the message archiver. Any ideas on what could be causing this issue?

    This is what I see with the poa being in diagnostic mode:
    11:02:42 896 IMAP command:[AUTHENTICATE] requested from ::ffff:10.2.1.124 User session()
    11:02:42 392 Resetting read descriptors
    11:02:42 392 Dispatched message for connection #3 protocol (IMAP)
    11:02:42 896 IMAP command:[XGWTRUSTEDAPP] requested from ::ffff:10.2.1.124 User session()
    11:02:42 392 Resetting read descriptors
    11:02:42 392 Dispatched message for connection #3 protocol (IMAP)
    11:02:42 896 IMAP command:[] requested from ::ffff:10.2.1.124 User session()
    11:02:42 896 Return from IMAP [890F]
    11:02:42 896 *** PHYSICAL PORT DISCONNECTED, Tbl Entry=3, Socket=94

  • GW Post Office Server Recommendation ...

    Hi everyone,
    Need to decide on a new server platform for our primary Post Office, currently running GW 8 on NetWare but will move to Linux with this new hardware (bare metal install of SLES 11 sp2 with OES for NSS filesystem). Have the following choices:
    Option A - HP Proliant DL380 G6, Qty 1-2.8GHz QC Xeon (X5560), 16GB RAM, Qty 4 600GB 15K SAS (raid 5), 512MB RAID cache
    or
    Option B - HP Proliant DL380 G6, Qty 2-2.5GHz QC Xeon (E5540), 16GB RAM, Qty 4 600GB 15K SAS (raid 5), 512MB RAID cache
    As you can see, the only real difference is in the CPUs with one unit providing 4 cores but higher clock speed and the second unit providing 8 cores but slower clock speed. Now, given that a GW PO is disk intensive, I am wondering whether the CPU options here really make that much difference. And, is 8 cores overkill in this situation? Any thoughts? Thanks.

    We are running our 3700 mailbox setup on a G7 version of this. You want more cores. Things like document conversion, webaccess, gwia, ... all can use additional cores. You neglected to mention the scale of your setup and what other agents you will be using.
    Raid 5 = REALLY BAD. For that array, it can take days to rebuild, your disk performance will be horrendous, impacting service, and meanwhile if another drive fails you are hosed. Get more smaller disks and use RAID 1. A larger write cache on the controller is helpful. More memory is helpful. But it would be useful to know how big your setup is.
    ( Depending on how critical performance is, placing OFUSER and OFMSG on SSD will greatly increase performance as well as prevent the "rot" caused by fragmentation of the databases that occurs over time. We have about 1TB of e-mail, and about 100GB of databases. So a pair of 128 / 256 GB enterprise SSD will do it. Wear leveling and predictive on the HP will heep you out of any of the hypothetical troubles you may hear rumors bout when using SSD. )
    -- Bob

  • The version of GroupWise you are using cannot access this post office

    I built a new Server and added it to my PCSD Tree. The new server name is
    GroupWise and has an IP Address of 10.10.0.13.
    I followed the GroupWise 7 Installation Guide and installed GroupWise to
    this server. At no point did I find any place to enter the GroupWise
    License.
    During the install I discovered that 4 of my long time employees were not
    able to be assigned to this new GroupWise server. It appears that a one
    time (Long time ago) these 4 employees were part of an old GroupWise Mail
    server that must have been removed. I can not find any reference to this
    old GroupWise server. My thought is to delete the accounts for there 4
    users and recreate the accounts.
    However the larger problem is this: I can not login to the GroupWise
    Server. Below are two screen shots of what I’m getting when I
    launch the GroupWise 7 Client. When I look at the .NLM loaded on the
    Server for GroupWise MTA 7.0 it shows Domain Total=1 Closed=0, Post
    Offices Total=1 Closed=1, Gateways Total=0 Closed=0.
    On the Client, when I launch GroupWise, The Novell GroupWise Startup has a
    message in the message window “The version of GroupWise you are
    using cannot access this post office”. Then after clicking OK three
    times, the following message appears on the screen “GroupWise did
    not initialize successfully, Please run GroupWise Setup, or contact your
    system administrator. Unspecified error OLE Error 80004005

    *During the install I discovered that 4 of my long time employees were not
    able to be assigned to this new GroupWise server. It appears that a one
    time (Long time ago) these 4 employees were part of an old GroupWise Mail
    server that must have been removed. I can not find any reference to this
    old GroupWise server. My thought is to delete the accounts for there 4
    users and recreate the accounts.
    **You need to disassociate these four NDS users from any GW attributes.
    Right-click each user in C1, GroupWise Utilities->GW / eDirectory
    Association->Disassociate GroupWise Attributes.
    *** When I do as instructed I get the following error:
    [username] is missing the following attribute: NGW: Post Office
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    *GroupWise MTA 7.0 it shows Domain Total=1 Closed=0, Post
    Offices Total=1 Closed=1, Gateways Total=0 Closed=0.
    **If the post office is closed, you need to determine why this is. On the
    MTA, hit F10, Configuration Status, highlight your PO and hit enter,
    select details, then look at the last closure reason.
    *** Last Closure Reason= Missing or incomplete address information
    [ When I installed GroupWise, I wanted all the e-mail to be stored on the
    EMAIL Volume. During the install, I Changed the Install Directory to
    \Groupwiseemail. After the install I have two directories in this volume.
    One called DOMAIN and the other called PCAM (PCAM is name of my domain).
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    *On the Client, when I launch GroupWise, The Novell GroupWise Startup has
    a message in the message window 'The version of GroupWise you are
    using cannot access this post office'.
    **What version of GroupWise is on the server and what version client are
    you
    using? Also, if you pull up the properties of both the domain and post
    office in C1 what is the database version listed as?
    *** I installed GroupWise 7 both Server and Client. I'm thinking this is
    due to the Post Office being closed. I only have 1 Post Office.
    Thank You;
    Lewis

  • With Firefox 4 I can't print a shipping label off the post office's website (click 'n ship) like I used to with Firefox 3

    I go through all the steps to print out a shipping label when I am on the post office's website for click 'n ship, but the website won't communicate with my printer (when I am in firefox 4). So I switched back to Firefox 3 and have no problems.
    This happened before in the beta version and I had to switch back to Firefox 3, so I was happy to switch again to Firefox 4 when the completed version came out, but the problem came up again and after all the steps were done to complete the shipping label and I hit the print label button, my printer connection window never popped up so that I could click on it to command my printer to print the label. I am a registered user of click 'n ship on www.usps.com

    After waiting forever to talk to some jerk at USPS Click and Ship help, he told me it's an Adobe issue. I didn't ask why it just started happening, but I too just updated to Foxfire 4 recently, it must have something to do with it.
    Open your Adobe reader... under programs...mine is called Adobe Reader X
    Go to "Edit" in top left...click "Properties"...
    Uncheck "display PDF in browser",
    Then restart your computer for it to take effect. I am so thankful it worked!

  • How can I get a list of Post Offices?

    Hi,
    I would like to get a list of Post Offices. According to the documentation this should be done this way:
    https://gwserver:9710/gwadmin-service/list/postOffice
    But the result is:
    <apiStatus xmlns:ns2="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <error>true</error>
    <httpStatus>BAD_REQUEST</httpStatus>
    <httpStatusCode>400</httpStatusCode>
    <statusCode>56092</statusCode>
    <statusMsg>No enum constant com.novell.gw.api.domain.DomainObjectType.POSTOFFI CE</statusMsg>
    </apiStatus>
    Listing domains, users, poas works as expected.

    Not sure if the doc is correct or not, but it is /list/post_office not /list/postoffice
    --Morris
    >>> gehorvath<[email protected]> 12/18/2014 8:26 AM >>>
    Hi,
    I would like to get a list of Post Offices. According to the
    documentation this should be done this way:
    https://gwserver:9710/gwadmin-service/list/postOffice
    But the result is:
    <apiStatus xmlns:ns2="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <error>true</error>
    <httpStatus>BAD_REQUEST</httpStatus>
    <httpStatusCode>400</httpStatusCode>
    <statusCode>56092</statusCode>
    <statusMsg>No enum constant
    com.novell.gw.api.domain.DomainObjectType.POSTOFFI CE</statusMsg>
    </apiStatus>
    Listing domains, users, poas works as expected.
    gehorvath
    gehorvath's Profile: https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=329
    View this thread: https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=481067
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
    http://www.avast.com

  • Order stuck at post office (not updating for about a week now)

    I've placed an order last week ( Tales of Xillia ) and it was scheduled to be delivered last Wednesday.
    The parcel has been stuck at the status "Parcel being transferred to local post office" since the 16th.
    This has happened to me before once and basically, the CSR just resent the same product to me.
    I was wondering if someone here could do the same in this case as well.
    Thanks!

    Hello karekano126,
    Lost packages are the worst, aren’t they?  While it certainly doesn’t happen very often, it can definitely ruin someone’s day, and I'm sorry for the disappointment this caused.
    If an online order is reported to us as missing, we reach out to UPS on your behalf to start an investigation to determine where your package may be. This process may take a few days to conclude. I would hate for this to cause further frustration for you than it already has though, and I have sent you a private message so that we may discuss this further. To view it, please make sure you are logged into the forum and click on the envelope in the upper right-hand corner.
    Thank you for posting,
    Alex|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • Reduce/Expire on post office - advice needed

    My organization has (had) an email retention policy of 30 days for
    email and 365 days for appointments.
    We have been on legal hold for the last 3 years so I am looking at
    roughly that amount of data that will need to be removed when we get
    the green light to come off of hold from the legal folks. (I'm told
    that is coming soon)
    My question is how does the expire/reduce run most efficiently? Should
    I just set my 30/365 days settings and let it run or does it run more
    effiently (quickly) if I did something like 365/720 then stepped down
    to the 30/365, which would require 2 passes through the post office.
    I know from observing the initial implementation of the policy, it is
    going to take more than a week to get everthing down to size. Also, I
    will probably have to run this stand alone so I can start/stop it as
    needed. We can't take too much of performance hit if I just start it
    from the server and let it run.
    Once I get the post office trimmed down, I'll be re-enabling the
    nightly scheduled expire/reduce options for maintenence.
    Any advice or recommendations are appreciated.
    Mark

    Hi Andy -
    Thanks for the input. My industry (without getting too specific)
    makes the rules but does not need to follow them if you read through
    the lines
    I've had discussions about archiving until I'm blue in the face. I
    would get more traction discussing it with my dog.
    The size of the post office is roughly 500 user at 380GB. I'll have
    to research the lenght of the full contents check that runs on the
    weekend. I like the idea of the three runs.
    On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:49:15 GMT, Andy Konecny
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    >In article <[email protected]>, Mark wrote:
    >> My organization has (had) an email retention policy of 30 days for
    >> email and 365 days for appointments.
    >That's quite short and might get you in legal trouble. It might be very
    >worth your while to investigate archival tools such as GWAVA's Retain.
    >
    >>
    >> My question is how does the expire/reduce run most efficiently? Should
    >> I just set my 30/365 days settings and let it run or does it run more
    >> effiently (quickly) if I did something like 365/720 then stepped down
    >> to the 30/365, which would require 2 passes through the post office.
    >> I know from observing the initial implementation of the policy, it is
    >> going to take more than a week to get everthing down to size. Also, I
    >> will probably have to run this stand alone so I can start/stop it as
    >> needed. We can't take too much of performance hit if I just start it
    >> from the server and let it run.
    >
    >How long does a full Contents analyze/fix take? You'll be in about that
    >time frame. What I would do is start with a pass on cleaning up just
    >trash, then just the appointments, then the mail. How big is this
    >PostOffice? (#Users & GB/TB?) How many CPUs? If virtual, adding some
    >more for this reduction would help.
    >
    >Was that initial implementation done from a stand alone system or agent
    >based? And what that on the current hardware config?
    >
    >
    >Andy Konecny
    >KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto
    >----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >Andy's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75037
    >

  • Post office upset w/separate auto & non-auto postage reports for same job.

    I am new to Business Objects Business Edition.  I am not sure why sometimes I process an automated mailing and get one postage report showing both auto and non-auto, then run another and get two postage reports, one for auto and one for non-auto.  The post office is always complaining that we shouldn't have two postage reports.  Can anyone offer a suggestion?

    Diane,
    When the Postage Statement Type Option is set to "By Mailing" a separate Postage Statement will print for each scheme that qualified for the presort (or for each entry point in Business Edition). By Mailing is the program default.
    In order to print one postage statement for the entire job, change the Postage Statement Type to By Job as follows:
    1.  Select Print > Reports
    2.  Highlight the Postage Statement
    3.  Click Options
    4.  Under Type, choose By Job
    5.  Click Create minimum number of pages (if it is not all ready checked)
    6.  To save as a default click Default
    7.  Click Save current settings as default
    8.  Click OK
    9.  Click OK
    Note: When setting this as a default it will change this job and be the new global default for new jobs. After May 14, 2007 rate case, and using 7.80c or later, the Postage Statement may be on three pages, not just two even when doing a By Job Statement.
    Diane - If you are usng Presort you can make the change to the report by opening up the postage statement block and setting the report to by job instead of by mailing.
    Thanks,
    Kendra
    Edited by: Kendra Vangundy on Dec 10, 2008 3:36 PM

  • Post office reporting in Unknown State

    We have Groupwise Monitor reporting one of our post offices in an
    uknownstate. This message is not sent continuously but when we check the PO
    it is running fine. This PO is being monitored remotely over T1, is there
    anything we can do to correct. We have tried to set up the SMNP monitoring
    for that PO only and cannot get it to work.

    [email protected] wrote:
    > This PO is being monitored remotely over T1
    Was this PO added manually? I have found that agents I add manually will
    always show unknown after a restart of Monitor, and if I delete them and
    readd they start working again. If this is your issue, then there is a bug
    already logged for this.
    Danita Zanre
    Novell Support Forums Volunteer
    GroupWise 7 Upgrade Guide!
    www.caledonia.net/gw7upg.html

Maybe you are looking for