2 iMac & 1 Mac Pro render a job of Maya

Hi all!
I have a LAN with 3 machines: 2 iMac 2GHz - 2GRam and MacPro 2.4GHz - 2GRam. And I'm use QMaster2 to render a small project Maya( This project, if batch render with 1 machine just take 1min).
My setting:
first iMac have been setting with: Services and cluster controller.
second iMac and MacPro have been setiing with: Services only.
So, I'm rendered. It is successful.
But i have some problems.
1. How to distribute batch. It seem not distributes in my job.
2. Time to render is very slowly. something wrong??????
3. Just MacPro submit a job to cluster, second iMac didn't add job in QMaster. Why that ???
please help me !!!!!!!!!!
Thank.
Thanh.

An i7 3.9GHz would do if you had 32GB RAM, an SSD boot drive, and 2TB hdd.
The sweet spot today on Mac Pro is $1800 4-core special and DIY to W3690 or W3680 6-core 3.33 or higher with 32-48GB RAM. And lots of SSDs and disk drives.
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/mac/mac_pro
Refurbished 27-inch iMac 3.4GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/mac/imac/27
The Mac Pro line is at a - not ready to ship the new 2013 6,1 model / not ready with 10.9 that it will need / and current configuration is really 2010 3 yrs old (but also how well they hold up and mature).
You do not want to give up GHz for more cores. MHz still rules. Only reason would be if you planned to replace the processors for the fastest expensive (use to be, though changing) 4 or 6-core 3.4GHz for total of 8 or 12-cores, but never the 2.4GHz, no way.
The 2009 4,1 used is cheaper and can be found for $1000 and upgraded to 6-core and everything else (dual core upgrades are harder and not good to plan for.
And http://www.barefeats.com has done some tests on iMac and Mac Pro.
Graphics on Mac Pro, RAM and PCIe and SSD, hdd are easy upgrades.
This site has some great tips
http://www.macperformanceguide.com

Similar Messages

From iMac to Mac Pro for the good of my Pro Tools 10...

hey guys,
here's the deal : it seems I'm at a turning point with my iMac (27", 3.1 Ghz i5, 4GB memory, 1TB hard drive, lion, PT10) and I'm thinking of buying a mac pro. Problem is, I'm not sure which model is best for my needs. I do postproduction work for television and I often have to work with pretty heavy projects.
My pro tools 10 keeps giving me the same 2 errors --
1- DAE can't get audio from the drive(s) fast enough. Your drive may be too slow, or fragmented, or a firewire drive could be having trouble due to the extra firewire bandwidth or cpu load. (-9073)
2- A CPU overload error occurred. If this happens often, try increasing the "H/W Buffer Size" in the Playback Engine Dialog, or removing some plug-ins. (-6101)
I might add, my Playback Engine's maxed out and I'm barely running any plugins (some 5 or 6 EQ3s, maybe 1 or 2 L2 and a Dorrough).
I have a MOTU Audio Express which is plugged in firewire and I'm running an external drive with my SFX on it, which is also plugged in firewire. The iMac having only one firewire plug (downsizing from the earlier iMac, for some obscure reason), I have a firewire hub.
I get the first error whenever I get too deep into a project and I start having a lot of SFX and I'm looking to add more and I get the second error whenever I try to run Dolby Media Meter.
I'm pretty aware I'm overrunning my iMac, so I'm willing to pay big bucks to get a computer that's best fitted to my needs and which I'll be able to upgrade every once in a while. Now, I'm just wondering what I actually need in a computer.
It's either the 3.2 GHz quad-core intel xeon, 6GB memory, 1TB HD or the two 2.4GHz 6-core intel zeon, 12GB memory, 1TB HD. I gotta say the second one seems kind of a lot... but I don't want to spend so much money and get a tiny upgrade from where I'm at right now.
So please! All of you mac wizards and other knowledgeable folks, HELP!

An i7 3.9GHz would do if you had 32GB RAM, an SSD boot drive, and 2TB hdd.
The sweet spot today on Mac Pro is $1800 4-core special and DIY to W3690 or W3680 6-core 3.33 or higher with 32-48GB RAM. And lots of SSDs and disk drives.
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/mac/mac_pro
Refurbished 27-inch iMac 3.4GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/mac/imac/27
The Mac Pro line is at a - not ready to ship the new 2013 6,1 model / not ready with 10.9 that it will need / and current configuration is really 2010 3 yrs old (but also how well they hold up and mature).
You do not want to give up GHz for more cores. MHz still rules. Only reason would be if you planned to replace the processors for the fastest expensive (use to be, though changing) 4 or 6-core 3.4GHz for total of 8 or 12-cores, but never the 2.4GHz, no way.
The 2009 4,1 used is cheaper and can be found for $1000 and upgraded to 6-core and everything else (dual core upgrades are harder and not good to plan for.
And http://www.barefeats.com has done some tests on iMac and Mac Pro.
Graphics on Mac Pro, RAM and PCIe and SSD, hdd are easy upgrades.
This site has some great tips
http://www.macperformanceguide.com

Imac vs mac pro for FCP?

Hello folks,
Well, my G5 apparently needs a new logic board. I could cry, or be happy at the excuse to get a new computer... I chose the latter!
Bottom line, what is the consensus regarding imac vs mac pro.
I will be using FCP a lot, that's what I do for a living. However, I rarely run other applications at the same time. Occassionally LiveType or Photoshop, but that's about it. No Motion, no After Effects, etc.
I feel that an imac will suffice nicely and that the mac pro is overkill in both cost and amount of computer. It's like getting an Indy car and driving 40 MPH!
Thoughts? Thank you.
Eric P

hmmm, interesting. Of course the mac pro would be better, no doubt. But for my purposes I still wonder if it's worth the cost.
As for Kevan D's inquirey for more info, yes I work with FCP for a living, at least 50% of my work week maybe more is editing. However, silly little ol' weddings have become the vast majority of my work and they will continue to be for at least a few more years I believe. In that time I do not see HD being a factor in my area. So for the forseeable future I expect to be working soley with SD. That bit of info may change some of your minds to thinking that an imac will suffice.
I admit, that's my hope because I would have to take out a loan for the mac pro, and again, I'm just not certain it's worth it for my purposes. On the other hand, I didn't ask the question so that I could hear what I "wanted", I do want honest opinions from other professionals like yourselves. If the experience is that an imac just isn't worth it then so be it.
As far as expandability (is that anything like drinkability??), I understand that, but again for my purposes I suspect that by the time I need to expand to HD or to using the full benefits of a mac pro, a new computer (and equipment) will be in the order anyway. Does that make sense?
Thanks again,
Eric

Imac verses mac pro - for Adobe Creative suite

Reguesting input: Which is better for operating Adobe Creative Suite 6.0 on a professional level, imac or Mac pro?

The raw compute power of today's iMac is more that the reasonably-priced Mac Pro models. But that is not the complete story.
The Mac Pro has:
• replaceable graphics cards and additional PCIe slots
• Error-Correcting Code memory, large memory sizes are attainable and will not be a headache.
• Four internal drive bays as opposed to one internal laptop bay. (except, the Fusion drive option in the iMac is fast and large-capacity)

Relative Noise Output of Intel iMac and Mac Pro

I run a computer based recording studio. I have been using a Powerbook for the last two or so years and I am thinking of upgrading to an iMac or Mac Pro.
However, noise is a sensitive issue for me. I have enjoyed near silence with the Powerbook, which enables me to hear into every aspect of my sound. I would like to continue enjoying that experience with an iMac or Mac Pro and wondered whether you could tell me how quiet these machines are? And whether there are any stats on the noise output of the Mac range?
Regards,
Stuart

I'm sure there were some noise figures published once for the G5 and MacPro but I've had a quick look and can't find them on the Apple site anymore.
In my experience the G5 is actually quite quiet compared with say a PC Workstation - that is until the Fans ramp up during heavy processing at which point it does get quite noisy. I expect the MacPro is similar in this respect.
Hope that helps a bit.
Rik

IMac or Mac Pro for iPhoto albums and home movie editing?

I have a Mac Pro OS X 10.6.8 with iPhoto 7.1.5. This system is now obsolete for ordering iPhoto albums. I need to upgrade to iPhoto 9.5.1 to buy a Mac produced photo album. To upgrade iPhoto I need to buy a new Mac as my 2004 Mac Pro with 2008 Snow Leopard can't be upgraded. I will use the new Mac for email, web surfing, iPhoto, and weekend video editing. I use Final Cut Express on my current Mac Pro. I will also need to transfer videos and about 20,000 photos from my current Mac to a new one.
So, here's the question: For my needs (listed above) which is better,
(1) iMac 27" or (2) new Mac Pro? Then, with the one chosen, how should it be configured to do my basic video editing? I have 100 hours of family video on Hi8 and VCR tapes and will edit these on Final Cut and burn them to DVD's. (I understand both iMac or Mac Pro now require an external DVD set-up.) So, which computer and how should it be configured. Looking to pay between $2500-$3500. Thanks for your help!

What video formats are you talking about? DV, HDV, etc?
Mac Pro is a better solution, regardless. Here's why: Simply upgrading an iMac HD is not enough. You do not want to capture your video to the boot drive. It's too much to ask the drive to manage the OS, your editing software, AND your media. This scenario might work - but is certainly prone to dropping frames. Ideally, you want one drive for OS + editing software & a separate drive to capture media to.
Now, since you can only have a single HD in the iMac, you're demoted to using external capture drives. So let's say you get yourself a FW800 drive for capture and then hook up your camera/deck to an available FW400 port. You'd think you're safe - and again, you may be. But the problem now is that the iMac has ONE and only ONE FireWire bus. So in theory these 2 devices: HD & Camera are battling for the same bandwidth. So you've still got a bottleneck happening.
So DV only would probably work. But it may have issues that the expandability of the Mac Pro can conquer. Hope this helps.

I opened my account on the MacAir and have the new Mountain Lion showing i purchased. When I open my account on my other two machines it does not show. Any suggestions on why or how to fix? iMac and Mac Pro Thanks

I opened my account on the MacAir and have the new Mountain Lion showing i purchased. When I open my account on my other two machines it does not show. Any suggestions on why or how to fix?
iMac and Mac Pro
Thanks

SADLY not as i downloaded an upgrad to my original PAGES/
i have in the meantim had to open www.icloud. then from there import the file that i am working on and then check on ipad if it uploaded/ yes it did.
but what a waste of time as it doesn not save any changes done automatically back in the cloud....
i am now downloading the new LION and hope that it will fix the problem
i cant find any other way. I was lead to believe that you wrote, it saved automatically, on to the cloud, you then opened anohter device in anotother country even, and the new file was there, waiting, in its latest version.......
and the same magic was supposed to happen in reverse.
It doesn't/
if i have to open a browser, go to www.icloud....why on earth did they not just leave us an icon to drop it in in that case?
I hope the new lion will help resolve the isssue/
any other ideas> keep em coming...thank you so much.

HT201380 keep having scrolling problems with Maverick on both iMac and Mac Pro despite downloading mail software update

Have scrolling problems with Maverick despite downloading mail update on both IMAC and Mac Pro
Have to reboot and it helps for awhile then stalls again

The Mac OS X 10.4.7 Update introduced connection issues as a result of (according to the documentation) "Mail now supports connecting to mail servers through a SOCKS proxy". This probably has nothing to do with your problem, but it'd be worth going to System Preferences > Network and making sure the SOCKS Proxy is not enabled in the network configuration used to connect to the Internet.
Also, it looks like the crashes you're talking about are actually freezes, i.e. Mail becomes unresponsive rather than quitting unexpectedly. In Mail, open Window > Activity Viewer, and see whether Mail displays there what it's doing when it freezes. Actually, you may be able to avoid having to force quit Mail by canceling whatever it's doing (by clicking on the red stop icon of the activity).
Reinstalling Mail will probably accomplish nothing, but it might be worth reinstalling the Combo Update for the type of machine and the version of Mac OS X you're using (which you would have to do anyway if you wanted to reinstall Mail):
Mac OS X 10.4.7 Combo Update for Intel
Take a look at the following articles for guidelines on how to properly install system updates:
Troubleshooting installation and software updates
Installing software updates
Basically, you should verify/repair the startup disk before installing the update, and no applications should be running while installing it.

IMac or Mac Pro

I have asked this question before and I'll be honest - I was sorta confused with some of the responses so I am back with what I hope are better thought out questions. I am torn between the iMac 3.06 and the Mac Pro 2.66 4-core.
I am not a pro but think of myself as a prosumer. I do a lot of Photoshop stuff, editing in iMovie and Final Cut Express - shoot a lot of stills and HD Video. NEVER DO GAME STUFF.....
Here is my dilemma...
On the Apple store site I created 3 machines with 8GB of Ram, AppleCare, Wireless Mouse, 1TB Hard Drive.
(iMac 3.06 - Mac Pro quad 2.66 - Mac Pro 2.66 8-core)
The iMac comes in at $3,388 with the extra 4GB of Ram. What is with $1,000 for an extra 4GB of Ram. Why so much higher than Mac Pro Ram????? Do I really need 8GB????
The Mac Pro 2.66 Quad comes in at $4,067 with the extra 2GB of Ram (seemed too reasonable not to add more Ram) and the 24" Monitor. Is this worth the $679 more since neither one can have more than 8GB of Ram?????
The Mac Pro 2.66 8-core comes in at a whoping $6,097 with the extra 2GB of Ram and the 24" Monitor. This kinda makes the choice between the 1st 2 since the difference of $2,709 appears a bit rediculous between the iMac and the 8-core Pro......WHY THIS MUCH MONEY?? ARE THESE REALLY COMPETITIVE WITH THE DELL ETC??? DO OTHERS EVEN BUILD A MACHINE AT THIS PRICE?
I know this is long and with a few concerns - thank you for indulging.
Thanking you in advance for any input I receive.
Wally

First of all, don't buy apple RAM. It is extremely overpriced. DO, however, keep the RAM that apple gives you. They won't service your Mac if it has 3rd-party RAM. If you need to have your mac serviced, remove the 3rd-party RAM until they're done servicing it. I would stick with the iMac though, You get more space (no tower). You have the screen built into the price as well. The applications you use don't even recognize the 8-cores of the Mac Pro. Adobe CS4 doesn't take advantage of the better GPU in the Mac Pro either. If you have A LOT of accessories that you connect to your Mac, you might want to consider the cheaper Mac Pro. USB hubs are a pain and they stop working if you use too many. Also, the Mac Pro has MANY FireWire ports, all backwards compatible. The Mac Pro is also more expandable. Overall, I would make it a choice between the 1st Mac Pro and the iMac. Media work will also render faster on the Mac Pro, so the better graphics isn't totally a waste. Also, with Snow Leopard coming up, multiple cores will be utilized more. If you have the money, I would go with the cheaper Mac Pro. If you are buying speakers, I would personally recommend the Bose Companion 2 speakers. They're only $99 so they're not much of a hole in your pocket.

New imac vs mac pro

Apologies if this is going over old ground.
I'm finally ready to upgrade/replace for Power Mac G5. It's been a loyal and reliable servant (apart from a blown graphics card this year) for 7 years, but it's time to retire.
I mainly use FCP & DVDSP with HD footage and increasingly Motion to produce short promos and corporate videos.
Although, my G5 does the job - it's now very slow rendering HD footage and Motion is almost a non-starter. Running concurrent applications is a painful and nosy experience.
So to new investment. With the obvious upgrading limitations of an imac, how long will it last before needing another upgrade? I'd be happy with 4 years
Or is the added expandability of a Mac Pro worth the extra cash?
I dare say either will blow me away at first.
imac
2.7GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5
4GB 1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x2GB
1TB Serial ATA Drive
AMD Radeon HD 6770M 512MB GDDR5
£1399 incl vat
mac pro
One 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon “Nehalem”
3 GB (3 x 1 GB)
1TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB
One 18x SuperDrive
£2041 incl vat
(Obviously also need a good monitor)
Ae there benchmark tests available to compare these two machines?
What say others in a similar position? Which would you go for?

New iMac has Thunderbolt, so you'll be able to edit from super fast Thuderbolt drives then they start shipping in about 3 more months. For now you're stuck with FW800 drives which really aren't ideal for HD work. But don't expect Thunderbolt drives to be cheap, not nearly as cheap as internal SATA drives for a tower.
Mac Pro allows you to install better, more powerful grahics cards that will let Motion, Color (and soon FCP X) run better, and you can get more CPU cores (which will impact FCP X, and the next version of FCStudio in beta testing). You'll also be able to add much less expesive internal drives (2TB for not much), which will be fast enough for working with FCS apps.
Either way, you want the most number of CPU cores, fastest CPUs, 8GB RAM, and two 7200rpm drives. You need a second drive as your scratch drive for sure. Best graphics card you can afford.
While I was at NAB, a few companies said they were looking into developing a Thuderbolt PCI card for the current Mac Pro towers. But I'm sure those will be some time before we see them.
Hint, don't get RAM and drives from Apple, go to OtherWorldComputing (.com) and get them much cheaper. Super easy to install, and they'll give you clear directions for doing so. Top notch customer support, also.

Which one is better for playback/performance - iMac or Mac Pro?

I'm getting a new mac and I don't care that much about the render time as I do about being able to play back my effects in real time. I know that both the $1500 iMac and the Mac Pro would work with Premiere and I'm pretty sure I won't have any problems with the Mac Pro but obviously I'm on a budget so my question is - will the iMac be able to handle effects in real time without the need for me to render first?

It makes no difference whatsoever.

IMac versus Mac Pro

Hello all,
I think the time has come for an upgrade. I have a Mac Pro that is about 6 years old. When I got it I was doing editing with FCP, 3D work with Poser, Vue Cinema 4D, etc. and graphics with Adobe Production Suite with After Effects. Now I don't do any video editing, but I still do the rest. The Mac Pro has gone as far as it can with operating system updates (10.7.4) though it still runs like a dream.
I want to know is, with what I mentioned above, should I upgrade to another Mac Pro tower or would a new iMac be as good or better. Money is sort of an issue, but so is expandability, reliability, etc.
I'd appreciate any advise
Thanks
Brian

"Have you already invested in a pair of 5355 Xeon? that gives you 8-core."
I didn't know that I could upgrade my processor power. All I can tell is that I have a Dual-Core Intel Xeon. You're saying I can add more or relace it with a more pwerful chip?
"Max out RAM to 32GB? 8x2GB can now be done for $132 @ Amazon which I recently did."
I already have all my RAM slots filled with 2gb chips so it's maxed out at 16gb. Can I take it to 32gb?
"What about ATI 5770 or something else?"
I just replaced the old card with a new 5770
10.8.2 and 10.7.5+
I just upgraded to 10.7.5. I must've spaced on that. I tried upgrading to Mountain Lion, but I'm told my machine is not compatible.
I'm interested in upgrading the processor and RAM so I could at least use this machine as part of a render farm. these things are possible?
Thanks
Brian

What do you recommend for me: MacBook Pro, iMac or Mac Pro?

I haven't decided what Mac I should buy. It's pretty hard for me. I'm fascinated with the iMac, MacBook Pro and Mac Pro. But I'm not sure what Mac is good for me. For now, I use my laptop for web browsing, sometimes photoshop and writing stories on notepad. But I'll probably do more later on such as developing 2D games and making music on GarageBand. I might make my own website with podcasts and possibly take advantage of Mac OS X's DVD creation software. I will also dual boot (Windows & Mac OS X which I'll use the most) and play games on it.
Money isn't a real problem. I only have $1,000 at the moment. But I'm going to get a job soon. I won't buy a Mac until the job is stable.
I don't know what to buy and not sure which one is the best for me. I like all 3 of them! I really like portability because I can take it anywhere. But I already have a notebook (not a Mac). I need a Mac that will last me a couple of years. Again, I'm afraid that newer stuff will come out and my computer will be inferior. lol.
So I'm hoping someone can help me come up with a decision. You guys/gals know more about computers than me. I'm new to Macs too. I became interested in Macs last year when I saw the Power Mac G5. I thought the tower looked awesome and then I started playing around with it.

I've never had an iMac wear out. My last one lasted four years and the guy who bought it from me on eBay reports that his is doing fine. It got HEAVY use in a dusty environment.
And Apple has been refining the iMac for years now. I keep hearing you emphasize durability, so that is why I am pushing it for you. No laptop will last as long. They operate at higher temperatures and take a beating. My Mac Book Pro already lost its back-lighting and has something wrong with the DVD eject feature. All repairable for free with Applecare, which I recommend. But my iMac will outlast my desire to own it, this I know for certain. I have the 20 inch and wish I had gotten the 24. If you're interested in my new 20", I will sell it to you for 1/3 off what I paid for it, and it comes with a transferable 3 year Applecare warranty. This way I could purchase the 24". It hadn't come out when I got the 20".
But first, come to the conclusion that you don't need an Apple laptop. That's the threshold decision.
Best of luck to you.

IMac vs Mac Pro

I am stuck on a decision for which computer is best for me. I am a camera operator and filmmaker. I use my mac very strenuously dealing with 4k raw footage. I am running programs live Avid Davinci Resolve and AE so having a good computer is important and not breaking the bank is also important.
Right now I am running a Mac Pro 3,1. Shes on her death bed but was curious if I could upgrade her to meet 4k standards. So my first question is what can I do to make this machine usable for 4K video editing? Give me a list of products I could put into her to make her a beast again.
My other option is to upgrade to a maxed out iMac 27inch. I like this option because of the design and all in one is nice for my desk but Im not sure if the longevity of this device is good and if she can handle 4K very well.
My last option is a base line 2013 Mac Pro. I dont know much if anything on this mac.
So what would you pick? I would love a list of upgrade parts for my Mac Pro 3,1 so I can get an estimate on how much that would cost.
Thanks Guys

I feel that an iMac with the newer Pegasus thunderbolt RAID enclosure will do exactly what you want.
What you need is a fast data storage system and not much else for 4K editing.
And even if it's not Pegasus you will get some sort of RAID for the Mac Pro since there are zero options to expand the internal drive to something that will suit your needs.
Yes the iMac won't have the dual graphic cards the Mac Pro has but my guess is you won't really need them.
So instead of investing money on the Mac Pro I would spend that difference on a good RAID system.
I would even say it might be worth a look to see if you can find a way to fit your current MacPro with a really fast RAID system.
There are options to also upgrade the graphics card for your machine and also your CPU.
The old Mac Pros are really capable machines so try also to see what you can do with it.
I regret selling my 2006 MacPro and I had fewer upgrade options than you have.
With 300euro I could upgrade the CPU to the exact same render speed of the late 2012 iMac I have at the moment.
So check all the different options and see what makes sense for your needs.

Lion designed for MacBooks and iMacs, not Mac Pros?

Seems to me that most of the major features of Lion only benefit folks using trackpads, which means mainly MacBook and iMac users. If you're a mouse-user all that built-in swiping and tapping is useless. To some degree, the same is true with Air Drop,great if you're mobile, but not so necessary otherwise. So, since I do 95% of my serious computer work on a Mac Pro, I see no benefit in upgrading to Lion. The only features that seem relevant are some of the lesser touted features like auto-save and maybe Mission Control, although that seems a bit meh to me.
Anyone care to tell me why I should invest $29 in this alleged upgrade?

Nostatic1
I upgraded, had a look and then decided to go back to Snow Leopard. Lion was a bit buggy for a start, but like you I have a Mac Pro, and do a lot of design type work, not as a profession though. Auto save worries me, as I want full control over when I save when designing stuff. To have to go back through lots of saved versions to get to the one I want to keep would seem to me to just be creating more work for me. As I understand it, it only works in apps that are adapted to use it, so my old CS3 would not do it, but that direction worries me if I don't have control over it.
A lot of the new features can be switched off if you don't like them, which is what I did, so why upgrade? The new iCal and Address Book are horrendous looking too!!! Gaudy is the term that comes to mind. So is the full screen version of Photo Booth. Those types of apps look OK on the iPhone, but look horribly out of place on a Mac, where they have already taken all the colour out of the program window borders to leave a pale grey. I couldn't bear to look at them, and had to replace those bits of the apps with graphics of my own.
My advice is not to do anything for at least a while. It seems that an awful lot of posts in this forum are people wanting to know how to alter Apple's defaults and to switch things off. I am hoping Apple is watching and taking notice.
It seems to me that Apple has taken the success of the iPhone and iPad as its inspiration to change the Mac. I have an iPhone and I find the apps like address book that reopen where you closed them a pain. Usually I don't want that same person again, and I have to navigate back to my groups, then out again to get to the right person. It would be much simpler to always start at groups. I cannot imagine doing serious design work with my finger on an iPad. The two should remain separate entities.
This is the first upgrade that I have reverted from in 18 years as a Mac user, and the first time I am really getting worried that Apple is going off in the wrong direction - and the first time that Steve Jobs is not at the helm. I don't have a good feeling for the future.

2 iMac & 1 Mac Pro render a job of Maya

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for