2 Modems on the same ADSL line?

I have a NetComm NB5Plus4W ADSL2+ modem router through which I can connect wirelessly to my iMac, MacBook and iPhone. There also another iMac at the other side of the house which rarely gets enough signal strength to connect to the internet. And due to our building type it is not realistic to establish a wired connection.
My question is this - Is it possible to connect 2 separate modems to the same phone line to piggyback the ADSL, or do I need to use a wifi range extender? Any recommendations ...

You could look into the line of products that use the electrical wiring to create a wired network. It's a UK site but it'll give you an idea of the products possibly available to you. Here is the link.

Similar Messages

On a MS Vista platform I just "upgraded" to Firefox 10.0.2 and now cannot connect. My wireless devices go throught the same DSL line and work. fine. 9.0.1 (previous version) worked fine. Suggestions?

I just "upgradd" to Firefox 10.0.2 and now cannot access the internet. This is an MS Vista platform. Wireless devices, through the same DSL line, are still fine, suggestions?

Did you try to view this article? [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Cannot%20connect%20after%20upgrading%20Firefox Problems connecting after Firefox Update]
You should also try using Firefox in [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Safe%20Mode Safe Mode]
Thanks,
Borian

102 combines all the GR qty for the same part # line item in the PO

I had a question on the behavior of movement 102 in SAP
In earlier versions, SAP combines all the GR qty for the same part # line item in the PO both in MIGO & in MB01.
Is a change in functionality in ECC which combines all the qty or is there any config that we are missing?

Hi,
Check your PO item details....is there GR based IV active in your current PO? I know, it should have effect on LIV only but, still trying to see a possibility if it has any impact on GR reversals too....
Regards
Message was edited by:
Gopala Turaga

Using an Internal 3G Modem along with an external 4G USB MOdem on the same computer

I have a Sony Viao running Windows 7 Professional. I have an internal Broadband card on the machine and an external 4G Modem. My old computer did not have an internal modem, and I was able to use both a 3G external modem and the 4G modem on the same computer. Depending on the area I was in, I would just plug in the proper modem, VZAccess MGR would ask if I want to configure to this modem, I would say "Yes" and I was on my way.
With this new computer, and it's internal card, plugging in the 4G modem does not cause the computer to ask me to reconfigure. In addition, since the 3G modem is internal, I would not be able to "plug in" the 3G when I am done using the external 4G modem. I am afraid I would lose the internal card's "set up" if I force it to work.
Is there a way to get the computer to operate both of these cards without causing issues?
Thank you in advance for your help!

I am sending you a private message to request additional information so we may troubleshoot your issue in further detail.
Thank you
KinquanaH_VZW

How do I add mult emails in the same To: line field?

Hello, I'm running Thunderbird 31.5.0. I was previously able to send multiple emails in a single To: line field, but now the text turns red and it won't allow me to add contacts from my address book after the 1st contact was added. I figured out after one address is added, you need to press enter key and it creates a second To: field row below the 1st one. This new change isn't ideal and quite cumbersome. How can I go back to the original settings where I can continue to add mult emails in a single line? Thanks!

Red is just a stupid color who ever choose that should think again.
You can add more on the same line with a comma (, ) between each address.
If one entry in address-book has more than one address then you can put all in, they will be comma-separated.
Warning don't put 2 commas after each other.
"MoreFunctionsForAddressBook" can help you with "one entry-many addresses"

I am moving and she has a tc and I do can I hook mine up to the same cable line

I am moving into my friends apt and she has a TC hooked up her cable but I have one too that I want to use and tore my info on. Can it be done that two tc share one cable line?

You can connect your TC to your friend's TC using an Ethernet cable and share the same Internet connection from the cable service.
Do you plan to configure your TC to provide another wireless network for your use only?
Or, do you plan to use your TC for backups only and use the existing wireless network at the apartment?

Is it possible for me to put my Norton toolbar on the same display line as the Firefox Bookmarks toolbar?

I would like to recover one line of my display area. My Firefox Bookmarks Toolbar and my Norton Toolbar are both short enough to fit on one line. I'd like to combine them.

Thanks for your response. I'm sorry to be so dense... but all I see in the referenced "how to" section is how to add function icons to the navigation bar. I don't see how to move an existing toolbar onto the same line as the existing Firefox Bookmarks toolbar. Can you please elaborate?
Thank you.

On board program does not run the motor to new positions yet commands to state of digital I/O in the same program line.

I am controlling a stepper motor position via a PIC-7342 board. This part of the program has worked in the past. I have another program that does almost the same thing and it works as always.
The program sets the speed and accelerations, then sets a position and tell the motor to run to the position. Then it sets a communication bit through the MCS register. Then it sets a new position and command the motor to run to the new position. It then delays a short time and commands an output to turn on. Then it sets a new position and commands the motor to run to the new position. After each command to run there is a wait for motion complete. The code used to work correctly. Now the motor runs to the first position and proceeds no further. The finial position is sometimes a couple of steps past the setpoint, which is very unusual. The digital output is fired like the second position has been reached, even though the motor has not moved to the position. The actual path for the motor is clear, so there is not mechanical reason for the problem. How would you troubleshoot an on board program?

ITElearner,
What has changed since you last ran your system? Can you move the motor in Measurement & automation explorer? Are you getting any errors? Is this program written in LabVIEW? You may also find the following useful:
Configuring a Motion Control System
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3126
Configure and Test a Stepper Motor
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/9675C83F037811F68625727C0002A4A5?OpenDocument
Regards,
Sam K
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
www.ni.com/support

Process Chnage over on the same production line

Hi PP Gurus,
I am having a scenario in process industry as below. The process line is used for producing different grades of chemicals.
When they change from one grade to another, the mateial from the pipe line is considered as a semifinished product. it is salable. How do we handle this on both Production and costing point of view.
Thanks and regards
Murugesan

Posted in CRM thread instead of PP thread

Getting two computers to run on the same internet line but to far to use wireless router.

i have my main computer in the house using westell 6100 and linksys wireless, but it will not reach, (distance wise) to the garage, where I have a phone line and want to use my laptop. Can i hook up another router to that phone line?

In order to avoid board clutter, we ask that you post your topic on one board only.
Please look ---> HERE for replies to your topic. Thank you.
If a forum member gives an answer you like, give them the Kudos they deserve. If a member gives you the answer to your question, mark the answer that solved your issue as the accepted solution.

Multiple text fields on the same line

Hi
Is it possible to have multiple text boxes on the same form line? I'm trying to replicate a form I've created usng Acrobat X Pro but can't seem to figure how to do it with FormsCentral?
Apologise if I'm missing something obvious!

We now support multiple fields on one line. This post provides a brief overview.
Give it a try and send us your feedback.
Sorry it took so long.
Randy

How to vertically align Prompts on the same line in OBIEE

Can we vertically align "Product Line (Owned)" and "Product Line(Not Owned)" in this Prompt on same vertical line?
so that "Product Line(Owned)" can start from the same vertical line where "Product Line(Not Owned)" starts
we tried few options by adding a text element in dashboard and playing with td.GFPFilter
but couldn't find a solution to it.
we were looking into this thread
Dashboard Prompt Alignment
Currently we have it like this, alignment is not same due to "Not Owned" text being longer than "Owned" text
"Product Pillar (Owned)"--------------"Product Line (Owned)"---------------------"Product (Owned)"
"Product Pillar (Not Owned)"--------------"Product Line (Not Owned)"---------------"Product (Not Owned)"
we want to have it like this,
"Product Pillar (Owned)"--------------"Product Line (Owned)"-------------"Product (Owned)"
"Product Pillar (Not Owned)"---------"Product Line (Not Owned)"--------"Product (Not Owned)"

Hi Rupak,
I just tried it and it the solution is pretty easy. Just add a text-box to your dashboard holding the following:
<style>td.GFPFilter {width: 200px}</style>You need to check "Contains HTML markup"
Regards,
Stijn

Filling line capacities for different products for the same line

Hi,
I have a filling Line PL1. Capacity is 24 hours.On this we can process products A and B.I have defined rate routing and assigned to the production versions in the respective Material master. Now my requirement,
If the product A is processed on PL1,maxmum run length is for 24 hours and the machine must be stopped for cleaning after this time for 2 hours.If the product B is processed on PL1,maximum run length is for 36 hours and the machine must be stopped for cleaning after this time for 4 hours.A and B can be planned on the same filling line back to back without a major change over and the filling line can be used continuously for 36 hours.But B and A cannot be planned on the same filling line back to back without a major change over and change over is required.
How do we map in the routing and where we maintain the conditions of 24 hous max run lentgth if product is A and 36 hours max run length if product is B....
Thanks
Hemanth

Hi Suresh,
Thanks for your quick reply. In my rate routing i maintain base qty 1000L and production time 1 hour tear down 2 hour for filling line FL1 with capacity 24 hours for Product A and maintain base qty 500L and production time 1 hour tear down 4 hour for filling line FL1 with capacity 24 hours for Product B.
Is it correct?
But where we are giving max length of run as 24 hours if product is A and Max lenght of run 36 hours if product is B...
Thanks in Advance
Hemanth

Taking over a line - Will I get the same problems?

I moved into new premises last Friday. I knew the previous occupant and I had already ordered my new BT line with infinity prior to my chat with him about HIS connection.
He told me he upgraded to Infinity 2 and was quoted 65D and 15U but had never got more than 40D and 10U. He had an engineer out and was told thats the max the line could handle, and until he moved out was stuck with a max profile of 43.3D and 20U.
Anyway I explained this situation to the sales rep when I ordered my new line and broadband and was assured this would NOT be the case in my situation. I was told that athough they could not give me specifics (aparently they are not allowed), but my line was coming out of a different "part" of the cabinet.
I explained to the rep that I understand what he was saying but the previous tennant had been told by openreach that they were getting 80MB at the cabinet and the speed was reducing between the cabinet and the premises, and the new line they are installing was just a "take over" and not a new physucal line so therefore I am worried I might inherit the same issue.
The sales rep told me this would definately not be the case and they get lots of calls like mine and its quite normal to expect things to be the same when you take over the line but this isnt how it works.
So my question, is, does it sound like im being fobbed off or, is there really a chance that suddenly the line might be better if its coming out of a different part of the cabinet even though its the same physical line and the original connection was getting 80MB at the cab end.
I was also promised that if i DIDNT get the expected speeds that BT would install a completely new physical line, which would be nice for customer options to listen into if things go pearshaped. I was also told that If i didnt get the estimates speed then I would only be charged for infinity 40/10??
How much of this is waffle?
CK

Infinity installed...
Same issues!!! Going to cancel and move to Sky's up to 40MB package for half the price. Being given the guff about waiting 10 days though.
CK

Strange issue - unable to establish PPP with Cisco 887 VAG router on one particular ADSL line

I have a strange problem that I’m struggling to get to the bottom of with my ISP and wondered if anyone could help.
We have a site with an older Cisco 877 ADSL router which was working happily until a few weeks ago when the connection dropped suddenly (out-of-hours at 2am if that’s of any significance – made me think most likely something carrier/ISP related?)    When connectivity was lost, the router could sync with the BT exchange (we are in the UK) but could not establish PPP.
We logged fault with our ISP – after some to’ing and fro’ing, they passed it onto BT and their engineers visited site, they fixed “a line fault” (we don’t get much detail on what was actually fixed) but we still could not establish connectivity – same thing, solid CD light but no PPP.
So, we replaced the router with another 877 – same again, solid CD but no PPP. We replaced all the cables and microfilter etc but no difference.
We tried a different Cisco router (a newer Cisco 887VAG) which, as I understand, uses a different modem chipset but no matter – PPP could still not be established. We tested this router on another ADSL line with the same ISP and it worked without issue, using the same ADSL account details, it was able to establish connectivity. So we figured this must still be a BT/ISP issue.
Since then we’ve had BT out again twice but they say there is no fault. The ISP say there is no issue with them. But we still cannot establish ADSL connectivity on this line, despite having tried 3 different ADSL routers and despite the fact the routers work with the same account details on another ADSL line.
The 887VAG router we have currently connected has 3G backup so that is keeping us going in the meantime and also means I can login to the router remotely to check on the ADSL status.
But I’m struggling to pinpoint where the problem may lie.   Strangely, if I turn on PPP negotiation and authentication debug then I’m not actually seeing any output from it at all?
Yet, the ATM interface is up and shows packets being sent and received:
ATM0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is MPC ATMSAR, address is bc16.6596.9b00 (bia bc16.6596.9b00)
MTU 1600 bytes, sub MTU 1600, BW 704 Kbit/sec, DLY 520 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ATM, loopback not set
Keepalive not supported
Encapsulation(s): AAL5
4 maximum active VCs, 1024 VCs per VP, 1 current VCCs
VC Auto Creation Disabled.
VC idle disconnect time: 300 seconds
Last input 00:00:28, output 00:00:07, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 6d23h
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: Per VC Queueing
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
     23886 packets input, 1676964 bytes, 0 no buffer
     Received 0 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
     0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
     56469 packets output, 4418592 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 6 interface resets
     0 unknown protocol drops
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
Does anyone have any ideas on where the problem may be and what more I can do to troubleshoot and provide the relevant evidence to our ISP (assuming it is an ISP/BT issue though the fact the same router works ok with the exact same details etc would seem to indicate it must be their issue!)

Hi Jody,
thanks for the suggestions. Here's what I see from the ppp debugs (but I'm not sure how to interpret?)
Jan 6 14:50:22.838: pppoe_send_padi:
contiguous pak, size 74
00 01 09 00 AA AA 03 00 80 C2 00 07 00 00 FF FF
FF FF FF FF BC 16 65 96 9B 00 88 63 11 09 00 00
00 10 01 01 00 00 01 03 00 08 0C 00 00 01 00 00
04 A3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ...
Jan 6 14:50:22.878: PPPoE 0: I PADO R:0030.8810.000b L:bc16.6596.9b00 0/38 ATM0.1
contiguous pak, size 71
BC 16 65 96 9B 00 00 30 88 10 00 0B 88 63 11 07
00 00 00 33 01 03 00 08 0C 00 00 01 00 00 04 A3
01 02 00 1F 62 72 61 73 2D 72 65 64 37 2E 6C 73
2D 62 61 73 2D 42 32 32 36 45 34 37 30 39 45 30
31 34 5A 01 01 00 00
Jan 6 14:50:24.885: OUT PADR from PPPoE Session
contiguous pak, size 85
00 01 09 00 AA AA 03 00 80 C2 00 07 00 00 00 30
88 10 00 0B BC 16 65 96 9B 00 88 63 11 19 00 00
00 33 01 03 00 08 0C 00 00 01 00 00 04 A3 01 02
00 1F 62 72 61 73 2D 72 65 64 37 2E 6C 73 2D 62
61 73 2D 42 32 32 36 45 ...
Jan 6 14:50:35.125: OUT PADR from PPPoE Session
contiguous pak, size 85
00 01 09 00 AA AA 03 00 80 C2 00 07 00 00 00 30
88 10 00 0B BC 16 65 96 9B 00 88 63 11 19 00 00
00 33 01 03 00 08 0C 00 00 01 00 00 04 A3 01 02
00 1F 62 72 61 73 2D 72 65 64 37 2E 6C 73 2D 62
61 73 2D 42 32 32 36 45 ...
Jan 6 14:50:45.364: OUT PADR from PPPoE Session
contiguous pak, size 85
00 01 09 00 AA AA 03 00 80 C2 00 07 00 00 00 30
88 10 00 0B BC 16 65 96 9B 00 88 63 11 19 00 00
00 33 01 03 00 08 0C 00 00 01 00 00 04 A3 01 02
00 1F 62 72 61 73 2D 72 65 64 37 2E 6C 73 2D 62
61 73 2D 42 32 32 36 45 ...
Jan 6 14:50:55.603: OUT PADR from PPPoE Session
contiguous pak, size 85
00 01 09 00 AA AA 03 00 80 C2 00 07 00 00 00 30
88 10 00 0B BC 16 65 96 9B 00 88 63 11 19 00 00
00 33 01 03 00 08 0C 00 00 01 00 00 04 A3 01 02
00 1F 62 72 61 73 2D 72 65 64 37 2E 6C 73 2D 62
61 73 2D 42 32 32 36 45 ...
Jan 6 14:51:05.843: OUT PADR from PPPoE Session
contiguous pak, size 85
00 01 09 00 AA AA 03 00 80 C2 00 07 00 00 00 30
88 10 00 0B BC 16 65 96 9B 00 88 63 11 19 00 00
00 33 01 03 00 08 0C 00 00 01 00 00 04 A3 01 02
00 1F 62 72 61 73 2D 72 65 64 37 2E 6C 73 2D 62
61 73 2D 42 32 32 36 45 ...
Jan 6 14:51:16.114: OUT PADR from PPPoE Session
contiguous pak, size 85
00 01 09 00 AA AA 03 00 80 C2 00 07 00 00 00 30
88 10 00 0B BC 16 65 96 9B 00 88 63 11 19 00 00
00 33 01 03 00 08 0C 00 00 01 00 00 04 A3 01 02
00 1F 62 72 61 73 2D 72 65 64 37 2E 6C 73 2D 62
61 73 2D 42 32 32 36 45 ...
Jan 6 14:51:26.353: [0]PPPoE 0: O PADT R:0000.0000.0000 L:0000.0000.0000 0/38 ATM0.1
contiguous pak, size 74
00 01 09 00 AA AA 03 00 80 C2 00 07 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 88 63 11 A7 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ...
Jan 6 14:51:46.576: pppoe_send_padi:
contiguous pak, size 74
00 01 09 00 AA AA 03 00 80 C2 00 07 00 00 FF FF
FF FF FF FF BC 16 65 96 9B 00 88 63 11 09 00 00
00 10 01 01 00 00 01 03 00 08 0C 00 00 01 00 00
04 A3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ...
Jan 6 14:51:46.608: PPPoE 0: I PADO R:0030.8810.000b L:bc16.6596.9b00 0/38 ATM0.1
contiguous pak, size 71
BC 16 65 96 9B 00 00 30 88 10 00 0B 88 63 11 07
00 00 00 33 01 03 00 08 0C 00 00 01 00 00 04 A3
01 02 00 1F 62 72 61 73 2D 72 65 64 37 2E 6C 73
2D 62 61 73 2D 42 32 32 36 45 34 37 30 39 45 30
31 34 5A 01 01 00 00
Provider wouldn't have bumped us from ADSL to VDSL - but here's the output of show controller vdsl 0:
Controller VDSL 0 is UP
Daemon Status: Up
XTU-R (DS) XTU-C (US)
Chip Vendor ID: 'BDCM' 'IFTN'
Chip Vendor Specific: 0x0000 0x71C8
Chip Vendor Country: 0xB500 0xB500
Modem Vendor ID: 'CSCO' ' '
Modem Vendor Specific: 0x4602 0x0000
Modem Vendor Country: 0xB500 0x0000
Serial Number Near: FCZ1111C08V C887VAG 15.2(4)M
Serial Number Far:
Modem Version Near: 15.2(4)M
Modem Version Far: 0x71c8
Modem Status: TC Sync (Showtime!)
DSL Config Mode: AUTO
Trained Mode: G.992.1 (ADSL) Annex A
TC Mode: ATM
Selftest Result: 0x00
DELT configuration: disabled
DELT state: not running
Trellis: ON ON
SRA: disabled disabled
SRA count: 0 0
Bit swap: enabled enabled
Bit swap count: 1 8
Line Attenuation: 54.5 dB 31.5 dB
Signal Attenuation: 54.5 dB 0.0 dB
Noise Margin: 6.7 dB 11.0 dB
Attainable Rate: 2132 kbits/s 888 kbits/s
Actual Power: 16.7 dBm 12.7 dBm
Total FECC: 546 0
Total ES: 6 0
Total SES: 0 0
Total LOSS: 0 0
Total UAS: 486 486
Total LPRS: 0 0
Total LOFS: 0 0
Total LOLS: 0 0
Full inits: 14
Failed full inits: 1
Short inits: 0
Failed short inits: 1
Firmware Source File Name (version)
VDSL user config flash:vdsl.bin-A2pv6C035d_d23j (10)
Modem FW Version: 110802_1752-4.02L.03.A2pv6C035d.d23j
Modem PHY Version: A2pv6C035d.d23j
Vendor Version:
DS Channel1 DS Channel0 US Channel1 US Channel0
Speed (kbps): 0 1664 0 704
SRA Previous Speed: 0 0 0 0
Previous Speed: 0 1600 0 736
Total Cells: 0 2786872 0 0
User Cells: 0 68 0 0
Reed-Solomon EC: 0 546 0 0
CRC Errors: 0 9 0 0
Header Errors: 0 10 0 0
Interleave (ms): 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00
Actual INP: 0.00 1.12 0.00 1.28
Training Log : Stopped
Training Log Filename : flash:vdsllog.bin
And here's the output from the ATM and dialer interfaces:
interface ATM0
no ip address
ip flow ingress
no atm ilmi-keepalive
end
interface ATM0.1 point-to-point
ip flow ingress
pvc 0/38
pppoe-client dial-pool-number 2
end
interface Dialer2
description OUTSIDE
ip address negotiated
ip access-group firewall in
ip mtu 1492
ip flow ingress
ip nat outside
ip inspect DEFAULT100 out
ip virtual-reassembly in
encapsulation ppp
dialer pool 2
dialer-group 2
ppp authentication chap callin
ppp chap hostname ###removed###
ppp chap password ###removed###
no cdp enable
crypto map dcvpn
end
As I say though, config-wise, everything should be correct - the same router works fine on another line (which should also confirm the authentication details are correct - at least in as far as it matches what the ISP have on their RADIUS)
Any further thoughts?

2 Modems on the same ADSL line?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for