2 users can access the same record

Hi all,
I have 2 users: Sale person and his assistant, they are given the same role as Sales. Both have ability to create a new record and access each other record.
How do I create such type of user and which privillege should grant for them?
Thank you
HP

Hi HP,
You can achieve this by creating the groups. You can add user to the group and whenever any user from that group will create a record; all other user by default will get full access to the records. you can have more then one group. But one user can be added to one group only. This grouping will not only allow them to share the records but also allow them to share their calendar by default, hence better synchronization while working together.
Below are the steps of creating the Groups
1. Go to Admin - Company Administration - Enable "Group sharing" feature
2. Go to admin - User Management - Public sharing group - create group
3. Create group and add users to the group
Note -
1. the records was created before enabling group will not add users of group to the record team
2. one of the group user should be the owner of the record
3. After enabling group feature, if you want to remove any of the user from team of any particular record, you can do that. Or if you want to add any user, you can also add to the team of that particular record.
If you find any problem in that, Please feel free to ask
All the best
Nisman

Similar Messages

What is the "best" way to configure iTunes on an iMac with personal user acounts so each user can access the media library but sync devices on their personal user account?

I am trying to determine the best way to set up our imac so each user account can access the same media (songs, movies etc.) through itunes and also back up and manage their personal devices under their own personal user account. There are 4 users on our iMac. Me, my wife, and our 2 children. We have built an extensive library of music/media together using the same iTunes store account. I would like to establish a seperate apple id and iTunes store account for each of us going forward but have the ability for each of us to share our purchases. What is the best way to configure our system and devices in order to allow shared access to media and at the same time allow for individual management of devices including contacts, apps, photos, etc. Please help, I would like to do this once!
Thank you in advance!

OK, seeing as no-one replied (presumably because a lot of this information is on the forums in bits elsewhere) here's how I've got on so far.
Applications - just went through them. About the only one I needed was my media server app. Just downloaded and re-installed, had a quick look back though my email to find the license key and it all went on fine. Installation never seemed quite right on my old machine so solved that problem too.
Movies - New iMovies just copied across the clips and projects into their respective folders. Seems to have worked but haven't checked it all that thoroughly. Some duplicate footage here but I can trim this out at some point when I get a chance to go through here.
Documents - Just copied these across.
Photos - used an app called iPhoto Library Manager. You can download for free but have to pay to use the part that consolidates your libraries. Possibly if I was willing to spend a bit more time I could have got away without using this but given I didn't know the state of my different libraries and just how many duplicates I had this was too much of a convenience to ignore. Also got my library into a state where I can now spend a few hours organising it a bit better with Faces / Events etc.
Not attempted Music or iPhone sync yet as been stuck trying to solve a problem with my power adapter.

I am not able to access the App Store on my Iphone 3GS with IOS 6.01, however i can access the same on my laptop when i connect my phone to my PC. Any suggestions on this.

I am not able to access the App Store on my Iphone 3GS with IOS 6.01, however i can access the same on my laptop when i connect my phone to my PC. Any suggestions on this.

varunsharmaapplefan
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5209 might help you. An iPhone 4 can airplay content from apps that support airplay and iTunes but it cannot mirror. If your game does not have airplay in the app you cannot mirror it to the apple TV so I don't know if you can play just the music. You should have no problem playing your iTunes over airplay though.
This may also help http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4437
Regards
Jules

Can you share bridge so other designers in the office can access the same files?

Can you share bridge so other designers in the office can access the same files?

Just to bring this into context, it helps to keep in mind Adobe's reluctance add any functionality to its software that would encourage working over a network. The following can be read in many archived messages at the Photoshop forum:
This is the boilerplate text often used in connection to saving to a network in the Photoshop forums. Please NOTE the part where it explains that normally, it does work, but that it is impossible to troubleshoot someone else's network remotely, and that's why it's not supported by Adobe:
If you are opening files over a network or saving them to a network server, please cease and desist immediately in the event you are currently experiencing problems with one or more files. Working across a network is not supported.
See:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/406/kb406793.html
Copy the CLOSED file from your server to your local hard disk, work on it, save it again to your local hard disk, close it, and copy the closed file back to the server.
Of course, the fact that Adobe does not support working across a network does not necessarily mean it won't work. It should.
Adobe's position is that there are too many variables in a network environment for them to guarantee that everything will work correctly in every network, especially given the fact that if something does not work properly, it's probably the network's fault, and Adobe has no way of troubleshooting your network.
If you can't work locally, you are on your own, and if something happens, you're on your own. If you must work from a server, make sure your network administrator is a competent professional.
When problems arise, a lot of valuable work can be lost.

How many users can view the same report at the same time in obiee answers

Hi All,
How many users can view the same report at the same time in obiee answers..?
What is max and minimum number of users.
Do we need to increase any system configuration.
Thanks,
Jagadees.

Hi,
Many users can view report at same time.It depends on the server if it can accept those many users at same time.If number of users increases OC4J may not work properly.
Refer : http://www.artofbi.com/index.php/2009/10/what-is-oc4j-an-oracle-application-server-distribution-really/
Regards,
Srikanth

The Windows SMB feature has file locking if multiple users are accessing the same file. Does Snow Leopard Server File Sharing (AFP) provide similar features?

The Windows SMB feature has file locking if multiple users are accessing the same file. Does File Sharing (AFP) on Snow Leopard Server provide similar services?

Were you ever able to solve this problem. I'm having similar issues since upgrading to snow leopard. Four macs connect to a Windows Server 2003 for shared files. Each user has full permissions & when we "get info" it shows read & write permissions. Two of the computers were running 10.4, two were running 10.5. Everything worked properly until upgrading to snow leopard. Some files let me copy, move, delete. Others either just hang up or we get a "no permission" error. Also getting a "pdf is in use" error, even when the file/folder doesn't contain a pdf. We had our IT rep check the server who said everything is in working order. They don't represent macs any longer but feel that it's a mac problem. I would have to agree since this problem only started after the upgrade, and the one machine that was not upgraded (still running 10.5.8) is not dealing with these problems.
Lastly, I would install 10.5 back on all of the computers if I could, but the leopard disk that came with one of the computers wouldn't work with the 2 machines running 10.4 and I didn't see it available at the apple store. I'll buy it if it's still available, but why wouldn't the disks that I have work?
Thanks for any help

Multiple User Accessing the same record issue

I am planning to design an app where we have the following use case requirement.
If a user who is logged into the system is accessing a record(plan in this case) anyone else who is logged into the system at the same time should be locked out of that same plan but should still be able to access other plans in the system. A plan has many things associated with it so the 2nd user should be locked out of everything associated to the plan being accessed by the first user.
What is the best way to implement this at the application or the database level?
Here are some options we have been bouncing around.
1. When the first user logs in and accesses the first plan we lock the plan at the app level using a singleton class which has one and only one instance on the app server. The plan_id can be put as an entry into a hashtable which can be in the session and is created if one does not exist. When the 2nd user tries to access the same plan, since the plan_id is still in the hashtable he would be locked out. However we somehow need to timeout the first user after 30 mts of inactivity or so so that others can access the plan and are not locked out for ever if the first user walks away from his PC or does not close his browser, thus keeping his session alive indefinitely.
2. In the database in the plan table we add a column for 'locked'. When the first entry is created in the plan table locked column is marked as 'yes' or 1 and when the user closes the browser we use some javascript to trigger an event which changes that 'yes' or 1 to 'no' or 0 thus unlocking the plan. However the big issue we see in this concept is that we will have to put a javascript onUnload method in all jsp pages in the app because the user could be anywhere in the app after starting his plan access after login.
Conceptually the 2 options are the same but one is done at the app whereas the other is at the database level.
Is there a better way to handle this scenario using transactions or some other technological option.
Thanks

Another solution involving no modification of the database structure:
As soon as a user want to access a plan, try to UPDATE the plan record... if it fails, the record was locked
by another user before. When the user has finished with the plan, you can COMMIT or ROLLBACK the changes, which will free the lock for other users.
An advantage of this solution is that if program crashes unexpectedly, there will automatically be a ROLLBACK.
Of course, you need a transaction for this... and perhaps more if you want to separate the 'locking transaction' (virtual update just for restricting access) from the 'operating transaction' (in which you will
do the DB stuff: inserts, updates, deletes, etc.)
Hope this helped,
Regards.

Check User Can Access the site collection Are Not?

Hi All
I have some requirement to check user can access site are not through powershell?
Recently we done migration from 2010 to 2013 SP after that i got some problem some users can not access site but this user have permission in sp 2010 site .
Regarding this i need to check specific user can loing or Access the site collection are not. using powershell
Some one said impersonate user we can check user can open the web are not but i don't know this impersonate.
Please help me guys....

Hi,
You can check the permission for specific user with powershell. Here is the link. Hope this will help.

Webiste shows Temp. Unavailable on my Mac but I can access the same webiste on my iPhone

I am trying to access a website that I have accessed many times before. Now it shows "site temporarily unavailable" . I am able to access this site from work as wellas from my iphone. Not sure what changed. Can anyone help me with this?

Using Safari ??
From your Safari menu bar click Safari > Preferences then select the Privacy tab.
Click: Remove All Website Data
Now empty the Safari cache.
Safari > Preferences then select the Advanced tab.
Select: Show Develop menu in menu bar
Now click Develop from the menu bar. From the drop down menu click Empty Caches.
Quit then relaunch Safari then try that website.
If that didn't help either, since you can access the site on our iPhone, restart your router.

I downloaded a song from an iTunes on my iPod Touch, and I want to know if I can access the same song from my computer to make a playlist?

I downloaded/bought a song from an iTunes app on my iPod Touch, and I want to know if I can access the song on my home computer to make a playlist and cd?

I added the song "Let Me Take You Home Tonight" by Boston by going to the iTunes Music Store and purchasing it as a ringtone. If you do it from your computer you have to sync it to your iPod Touch. Then in the alam sounds panel there is a place for "purchased" Your song should appear there.

How many instances can access the same queue at the same time ?

Hi,
In my application I am cloning a VI n times and these n instances are accessing the same queue. Is there any restriction on this 'n' for successful operation.
Regards,
Runjhun

Runjhun,
If the accesses are to enqueue data, then no limit (beyond the number of VIs which will fit in memory). If you are dequeuing, then n =1. Dequeue removes data from the queue and you would have no way to know which of the n VIs got which element from the queue. Read the deteiled help for the queue functions. If you need to read the same data in multiple places, you need some other mechanism.
Please tell us more about your application. What kind of data and how much data are in the queue? How fast is the data being generated? How long must the data persist (be availabel after it is generated)? Do you need to guarantee that all the VIs get the data?
Lynn

More than one Thread accessing the same records in the database

Hi, I have more than one thread accessing a synchronized method called getMinPrimaryKey() which gets the lowest of the primary key frm the table based on the a flag which is set to true. once it is retrieved the same method also sets the flag as false so it is not retrieved the second time. so next time a different thread calls this method it should retrieve the next available lowest primarmy key.
but even when i have the method as synchronized different threads keep returning the same primary key instead of getting the next sequence. can some one let me know where I might go wrong and what could be the solution. is it because when once i retrieve the record and set the flag as false, i also need to commit it?, which could be the reason the select query still picks up the same primary key. please help me out on this.
thanks,
Harish

Correction. If different threads always return the same key then your table isn't getting up dated. If different threads sometimes return the same key, then either the database is committing lazily, or else the threads are calling getMinPrimaryKey on different objects and so are not executing atomically with respect to each other.

We have two users that access the same mailbox but want separate user profiles when they respond to e-mails.

We have two users who want to use the same inbox. For example, when one user sends an e mail, it appears to be from the other user. We want to change this situation. How can we make that happen?

Firefox doesn't do email, it's strictly a web browser.
If you are using Firefox to access your mail, you are using "web-mail". You need to seek support from your service provider or a forum for that service.
If your problem is with Mozilla Thunderbird, see this forum for support.
[http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/support/] <br />
or this one <br />
[http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=39]

Mac on Windows SMB Share- IDLK files disappearing allowing several users to access the same file

Hi,
We have a volume licensing agreement with Adobe and have around 16 Adobe CS6 licenses all used on Macs. The network is based around Windows servers and shares which the Macs connect to via an SMB connection to the server. The issue we're having is that when an InDesign file is opened, sometimes it will not create an IDLK file (or sometimes it will create one but it will disappear seconds later) and it allows several people to view the same file at the same time. Obviously two or more people working on the same file can, will and has caused issues with overwriting documents without knowledge of doing so.
Has anyone else encountered this or have any ideas as to what might help us resolve this issue?
Thanks

When you open a file from a previous version (you'll see converted in
the file name) there is no CS6 file in existence, yet. Once the file is
saved as a CS6 file, the lock file is created. The whole procedure is
designed so that you must make a fully conscious decision to overwrite
the old version file with a new one.
This is no different than creating a new document that hasn't been saved
yet.

Setting Time of Day users can access the system

This has probably been asked and answered before but please bear with me, I'm new ...
Is there a parameter that can be set to limit the time of day that users can login to the system?

Hi,
an option is to shutdown the user related services (like the report processing servers) using O/S scripts for a given time period.
Regards,
Stratos

2 users can access the same record

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for