2 x 4400n

Hi,
I have 2 x 4400N's configured exactly the same but when I search for wireless networks - 2 wireless networks show up.
If the SSID and all the other settigns are configured the same shouldnt only 1 SSID wireless network show up?
Am I missing something?
Thanks

What shows up depends on the software you use. If it only shows you the SSID it will show you only a single network SSID. If it shows you the mac addresses of the access points it will show you two access points with the same SSID.
The best way to set up two WAPs which connect to the same physical LAN is identical wireless settings (SSID, wireless security, passphrase, etc.) except the channels. Channels should differ to avoid interference. This will create a roaming wireless network.

Similar Messages

  • WRVS-4400N no IPv6 on WAN Interface

    Currently the WRVS-4400N will only support IPv6 limited.
    Is there a time line when this device will support IPv6 also on the WAN Interface? I want to move over to IPv6 complete and get rid of IPv4.
    PLEASE!!! START TO SUPPORT IPv6 FULL ON EVERY DEVICE!!
    Best regards,
    Torsten

    In the meantime I have seen that the RV220W will full support IPv6.
    I think about to trash the WRVS and move over to RV220W.
    EDIT:
    http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=11973&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30
    Check out the last posting pls.
    I don't understand why CISCO support will give such comments. From my point of view this will say everything about the future of the WRVS device.
    Thanks!

  • Linksys/Cisco WRVS-4400N.v2 - WAN dual-pptp(l2tp) setup?

    Good day.
    I've recently received a WRVS-4400N v2 and I'm having the following problems:
    I don't see any way to set it up to work with my provider, as it works with so-called by Dlink "dual-access pptp (or l2tp). So, I'v got a static IP I receive, when I connect to L2TP server, but first I receive a dynamic, which let's me into their network. Did anyone try configuring wrvs4400n under such conditions?
    Second problem is that you cannot set it to access pptp/l2tp server by name, only by IP, which is not acceptable - access servers do change their ips from time to time.
    Are there any solutions\ideas? OpenWRT/DD-WRT don't support this model. Can I hope for a firmware upgrade, which will allow the aforementioned, or should I just get rid off this model?
    Thanks for your attention.
    Andrei

    Good day.
    I've recently received a WRVS-4400N v2 and I'm having the following problems:
    I don't see any way to set it up to work with my provider, as it works with so-called by Dlink "dual-access pptp (or l2tp). So, I'v got a static IP I receive, when I connect to L2TP server, but first I receive a dynamic, which let's me into their network. Did anyone try configuring wrvs4400n under such conditions?
    Second problem is that you cannot set it to access pptp/l2tp server by name, only by IP, which is not acceptable - access servers do change their ips from time to time.
    Are there any solutions\ideas? OpenWRT/DD-WRT don't support this model. Can I hope for a firmware upgrade, which will allow the aforementioned, or should I just get rid off this model?
    Thanks for your attention.
    Andrei

  • OID of Cisco WRVS 4400N Router

    Hi,
    Can any one help me with this. Which OID is used for getting the CPU and Memory usage of Cisco WRVS 4400N wireless router?
    Regards,
    Ejaz

    Hi,
    Can any one help me with this. Which OID is used for getting the CPU and Memory usage of Cisco WRVS 4400N wireless router?
    Regards,
    Ejaz

  • WAP 4400N

    Hi guys
    I am TOTALLY incompetent in setting up wireless connections. I have a ADSL 512k connection via a Linksys WAG 300N modem router on the ground floor and it is linked by an ethernet cable to a WAP 4400N on the first floor.
    Recently the internet connection on the first floor has started to become erratic.
    Hence my questions
    how do I correct the problem?
    If I try a reset, how long do I have to push the button?
    could it be that the access point needs an update of its firmware? How do I check which firmware is currently operating? I suppose that I have to connect my laptop to the WAP and then type some url like 192.168.1.1. ????
    How do I activate the Power over Ethernet facility? So far I have always used a power cable.
    the helpline number here in Dubai which links to an operator in India is unable to help becuase this WAP is a business device....
    Many thanks.
    Piet Bekaert
    Dubai

    Dear Edgard
    Many, many thanks for your offer to help. But please, consider I am a total ignorant in these matters ( I am a medical doctor!), so if you don't mind, can you help me step by step?
    To answer you point 1: yes, the WAP is connected to the WAG by ethernet. But what do you mean by Make sure the Gateway and Primary DNS on the WAP4400n is pointing to the WAG300N (192.168.1.1) ? If you mean thatm each unit's antenna point to the other, the answer is yes.
    You say set the wireless tab with a SSID differently from any wireless devices, but can use the same security mode and password. Can you elaborate on that? I have a few internet radios around the house and this is precisely also why I was advised to buy the WAP 4400N.
    Point 2: I have done a soft reset by pressing for 1 second as advised on the cisco's website. It seems to have improved the connectivity quite a bit. Do I still need to do a hard reset?
    Point 3: I have downloaded the latest sofware as you recommended. You say: This is accomplished by typing in the address bar: 192.168.1.245.
    But how do I enter the 192.168.1.245??? I have tried to connect my laptop via an ethernet cable directly to the WAP 4400N, and entered the DNS but it was not accepted. Do I need to enter it via the WAG 300N which in turn wil tranmit it by itseld to the WAP?
    Point 4: it is precisely the WAP that I want to power via the PoE. But when I remove the power supply, it just goes blank, and the LED of PoE on the unit does not light up. Why not?
    Many thanks for your help and patience. My big problem in Dubai is that opur helpline is only for lome units from Linksys, and the guys say that they are not trained to answer questions about the business unit. The 800 number for Saudi Arabia, but this is another country, and the number is not accessible from Dubai.
    Kind regards
    Piet

  • 4400N - WPA2 - bug

    We are using 2 of these with WPA2 authentication/encryption - intended for use on our corporate network. AP is not configured to route/PORT FORWARD or anything fancy. DHCP is disabled as we have a DHCP server on the same subnet the LAN and Wireless interfaces are configured for on the AP. I simply want these to authenticate my hosts via WPA2 and allow us to roam between 2 or 3 of the APs.
    Anyway, this setup works great for a couple days (users can connect wirelessly, authenticate via RADIUS and WPA2) AND roam between Access Points. Then, after 2 days or so the layer 3 connectivity between laptops and the AP suddenly stops. Rebooting laptops and APs has no effect. When roaming between APs I see my Mac-address showing up on the appropriate ports on the Catalyst switch these are connected to -- I also see the authentication retry show up and process appropriately on the RADIUS/DHCP servers. I never lose connection to the different APs -- except for the problem that I am no longer connected at layer 3. Can no longer ping gateways, APs DHCP/RADIUS servers etc.
    Problem seems to be that the ARP/MAC tables on the APs flake out after 48-72 hours. VERY IRRITATING. If I reset to factory defaults and then reconfigure the EXACT same settings - it works great again for 2-3 days...
    Packet captures on the DHCP/RADIUS servers etc. all show up fine -- which clearly puts the problem with these APs...
    Message Edited by 32423SE on 06-20-2007 12:57 PM

    Hi Helm
    I've tried all the combinations:
    PSK-Personal : TKIP
    PSK-Personal : AES
    PSK2-Personal : AES
    PSK2-Personal : TKIP or AES
    Have also tried to tweak the Advanced Wireless Settings for the different comboes with no luck. The wireless connection will only stay on for a while and then suddenly drops
    The funny thing is that the pc looks like it's still connected but there's no "hole" through to the Internet/network. I'm also not able to ping the router. To get online again I have to run a ipconfig release/renew of the IP-address.
    FYI: I have 5 different laptops (with newest updates/drivers) that has the same problem. So it's not a driver/network card issue.
    The only way I can get the router stable is to set it to WEP/128 bit encryption.That's why I'm suspecting that there might be a bug in the WPA/WPA2 mode.

  • WRVS-4400N Firewall

    Hello ! In FIREWALL/INTERNET ACCESS POLICY Since there are up to 20 entries you can set as a "Forbidden Domains" or "Forbidden Keywords" and I would like to protect my network by adding some more, I created a brand new policy (pull down menu " Internet Access Policy"), I set the same IP RANGE where I would like it have effect, 24h schedule and I've enabled it. I saved the rule, and I've restarted the router. Then I tested it and I've noticed the firewall doesn't care about the second rule. In other words: I can't have access to the URLs listed in the first policy (right) I can have access to the URLs listed in the second policy (wrong) My FW version is: 1.00.15 Did I something wrong ir this is another bug ? Thanks and regards. Luca

    It is not a bug. It is just a limitation like many others you find in web-based consumer and SMB routers. If you need more extensive or more complex blocking/filtering you need a better router which allows you to freely configure the filter. But then you are looking at a far more expensive devices which is far more difficult to configure.
    Why do you want to block so many URLs and keywords anyway? Are you aware that those blocking lists won't keep people from accessing those places? That's why those blocking lists are often completely useless because they are not very effective.

  • Wrt300n and wap 4400n for network in iraq

    Here is what i want to do and what i have.  I need to know what else i need please:
    I am in iraq trying to setup a wireless network with 2 parts.  I have the wrt300n that will be connected to the internet to setup up wireless internet and the wap4400n so that i can setup a local network.  the internet goes up and down so often that i need the local network to chat with others.  from the router to my location is about 75ft with 15ft tall concrete barriors in the way.  the wap4400n will be setup at my location.  the computers that i want to communicate with for both internet and chat are aprox 175ft in a triangle from my location to two locations with concrete barriors periodically placed.  i have not been able to test the system yet. 
    Question #1:  what range extenders can I use that will allow me to extend both systems.
    Question #2  what do these extenders need to be connected to(power) and are these antennas able to be placed outside?
    Question #3:  can the wap4400n be used as one of the extenders for the router to boost the internet signal? 
    Question #4:  what is the reccomended distance before you need to get an antenna booster.  I know this varies based on situation.
    Thanks in advance.
    Ray from south of baghdad.....

    i don't think that the WAP4400N is capable of repeating the wireless signals..it can function only as an Access Point...so the only way to use it would be to run an ethernet cable between the WRT300N and WAP4400N...
    if u want more range , better set up would be
    WRT300N -->> WAP54GP( AP Mode)   ~~~~~~ WAP54GP ( Wireless Repeater )

  • WRVS 4400N

    I am trying to add a WRVS4400N into an existing 172.xx.xxx.xxx network.
    I have created a reservation for this in DHCP and add this IP into the Router.
    I have setthe router to not do DHCP, since it is done from my server.
    My problem is:
    1) I can connect to the wireless fine, but can never get to the internet.
    2) Once I make the changes to the router for the above, I can't get back into it.
    What steps should I follow to get this up and running?
    What should the WAN and LAN settings be on the router?
    Basically, I am using this to allow 24 laptops access to our existing network resources.
    Thanks,
    Scott

    Dave,
    Thanks for the reply.
    Yes, this will be plugged into one of the LAN ports on our network and it's sole purpose is to be an access point for 24 netbooks.
    Basically, it is being used in a high school. The goal is to be able to roll a netbook cart (with this attached), be able to plug this into any network port in the building and have it work as an access point in that classroom. It's doesn't need to do anything else, really. All of the routing is handled by the buildings router.
    Scott

  • Pages '08 Arabic doc prints in Tiger, not Leopard

    I have a Pages '08 doc that is a mix of Arabic and English characters which will not print fully in Leopard but prints fine in Tiger (on either a Xerox Phaser 4400n or an HP LaserJet 4200n). The printer prints a blank page or, occasionally, a PostScript error. It seems that the trouble is specific to the characters in this doc, as other Arabic docs print fine, even under Leopard. I've been able to get parts of the unprintable doc to print by selectively deleting text, but I wasn't able to narrow down exactly what the offending characters or strings were.
    Deleting and re-adding the printer and updating the HP printer drivers didn't help. Any suggestions on where I could look for error logs, fixes, further troubleshooting?

    I have a Pages '08 doc that is a mix of Arabic and English characters
    Pages often messes up Arabic text, especially when mixed with English, and it is normally recommended to use a different app for such things (Mellel is the best). Is your text known to be correct?

  • Help NEEDED!! WSVR4400N VPN & QuickVPN setup

    I have the 4400n router. I want to connect to my office using the VPN & QuickVPN setup. Office: Small Biz server 2003 set to a "workgroup" network setup only. WSVR4400N router and Comcast internet Router: I setup the VPN Client Name and password. It is active. Home computer or laptop from work: I downloaded the latest QuickVPN software. Put in info and logged in. Results: Enter required info & connect. It starts but hangs at "Verifying Network". No connection is ever made. The office router states I am "online" but I can't do anything and the box at the lower right has a red line thru it. No port forwarding setup. I have tried setting the port forwarding to the server and to the router as well with no luck. What the heck do I do??? Thanks in advance. Chris

    Do you have two routers? You wrote something about a comcast router. Can you please describe the exact setup of the routers you have, starting from the modem including the IP addresses. In particular: does the WRVS have a public IP address?
    Moreover, please check the log on the WRVS. It should contain information about VPN connection attempts.
    Which port forwardings did you try exactly?
    Did you have the "online" status without any port forwardings?
    It would definitively help to know whether it works while the client is not behind a router, i.e. the client computer has a public IP address. NAT is a killer for IPSec. IPSec makes sure IP packet are not modified. NAT must modify packets.
    Message Edited by gv on 04-18-2008 11:56 PM

  • WRVS4400N Won't allow L2TP traffic to passthrough

    The latest in a series of issues with the WRVS4400N:
    As any Mac user knows, you cannot connect to this device with QuickVPN, as there is no Mac version of QuickVPN.  That leaves us with one of two options:
    1)  Obtain iPSecuritas and configure an IPSec tunnel with it.  Problematic for many, but it can be done.  I've been doing it for two years, but recently learned that with this configuration, you can't route all network traffic over the VPN (email, web browsing, etc), which is sometimes a security concern when on public wifi.  This leaves you with solution 2:
    2)  Get some other VPN device and put it behind the Linksys Router and setup the Linksys to passthrough VPN traffic, and/or forward the necessary ports.
    I am running both a PPTP and L2TP server on Mac OS X server behind the WRVS4400N.  I have the 4400N setup to passthrough all VPN traffic (select the enable circle for IPSec, PPTP, and L2TP on the VPN Passthrough tab).
    After forwarding the appropriate port (1723) to the OS X server's ip address, PPTP goes through just fine.
    L2TP is a problem, though.  Nothing I try gets through this 4400N.  As stated above I have L2TP passthrough enabled.  I have also forwarded ports UDP 500, UDP 4500 and even tcp/udp 1701 to the L2TP server's ip address.  No go, no traffic gets through.
    Suspecting it was something wrong with my L2TP server or client settings, I put the L2TP server into a DMZ zone.  Voila!  L2TP traffic connects as expected.  This proves it is the WRVS4400N not doing its thing.
    I have checked the logs on the WRVS4400N and nothing appears at all.  I thought maybe that it is reading the L2TP traffic as IPSec traffic destined for its internal IPSec server, even though I don't have any IPSec tunnels or QuickVPN accounts setup on the WRVS4400N, but with the lousy logging and no ipconntrak tables in this version of the firmware, i don't know what else to check. 
    I am using Firmware v1.0.16 because v1.1.03 is not stable on my router.  Using that firmware leaves the router in a corrupted state requiring a power cycle to reset it after any IPSec connection is shut down.
    Can anyone suggest what I am missing or doing wrong in getting the WRVS4400N to actually passthrough my L2TP traffic to the working L2TP server?
    /rant:  I have to say I am begining to hate the WRVS4400N.  This temperamental beast has a lot of frustration and long hours over the past two years;  in hindsight, considering the hours (in excess of 100, seriously) I have put in to trying to get various forms of VPN working on it, I should have just moved on to a more stable and flexible router.  

    gv wrote:
    1. Never ever forward L2TP port 1701. That's a security risk. Port 1701 is not supposed to be accessible from the internet.
    2. Running an IPSec server behind a NAT gateway is a very bad idea and is either very difficult or impossible depending on the server software and kernel version on the server machine. In particular you usually see a lot of problems if the client as well is behind a NAT gateway.
    3. Turn off the L2TP and IPSec passthrough options. Passthrough is difficult because NAT will modify the packets passing. When you disable the passthrough options the VPN client and server should switch to encapsulation through UDP port 4500.
    Thanks for the reply.  Comments/follow-up on each of your numbered responses:
     1)  Port 1701 is off.  Plenty of sites insist it must be open, so I tried it out of desperation.  Lots of bad information on the internet, as we all know.
     2a)   My IPSec server has always been the NAT gateway itself (the WRVS4400N).  That's not the problem.  My issue with leaving the setup that way is that Linksys has ZERO support for Mac OS X to connect to the WRVS4400N's IPSec VPN.  QuickVPN is only offered for Windows OS, and Cisco VPN Client for OS X will not connect with the WRVS4400N.  THis leaves me with having to use 3rd partyclient  solutions which work flawlessly and completely with other hardware but not with the WRVS4400N.  
    I'd actually be happy with that solution if I could route all traffic (web and email especially) over the VPN tunnel.  THis won't work with the only solutions I have to using IPSec on a Mac to connect to the network.  I've considered establishing SSH tunnels binding the various ports, but proxies, slower performance and other issues make that less than desirable.  Very frustrating.
    I guess since L2TP uses IPSec, your point is relevant, but I don't understand why, if IPSec behind a NAT gateway is such a bad idea, EVERY router on the market offers IPSec passthrough in its specs.  
    If it's so problematic, and such a bad idea, why allow it?   Especially on devices marketed to SOHO consumers who are bound to have less networking savvy?  In fact, the Linksys products ship with these options ENABLED by default. 
    3)  I've done all that.  
    Here are log entries from the WRVS4400N for a few combinations of passthrough and port forwarding:
    Passthrough disabled, ports forwarded
    Dec 7 07:38:40 - Drop by Port Scan UDP
    Dec 7 07:41:25 - UDP Packet - Source:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx,500 Destination:192.168.2.11,500 - [Firewall Log-IPSecPass Fail]
    Dec 7 07:41:30 - [VPN Log]: shutting down
    Dec 7 07:41:30 - IPSEC EVENT: KLIPS device ipsec0 shut down.
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: Starting Pluto (Openswan Version cvs2006Jan12_11:29:56 X.509-1.5.4 PLUTO_SENDS_VENDORID PLUTO_USES_KEYRR; Vendor ID OE@ECqImzhFD)
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: @(#) built on Aug 2 2007:11:09:37:
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: Setting NAT-Traversal port-4500 floating to on
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: port floating activation criteria nat_t=1/port_fload=1
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: including NAT-Traversal patch (Version 0.6c)
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: ike_alg_register_enc(): Activating OAKLEY_AES_CBC: Ok (ret=0)
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: starting up 1 cryptographic helpers
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: started helper pid=11543 (fd:5)
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: Using KLIPS IPsec interface code on 2.4.27-star
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: Changing to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts'
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: Changing to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts'
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: Changing to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts'
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: Changing to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/crls'
    Dec 7 07:41:32 - [VPN Log]: Warning: empty directory
    passthrough enabled, ports not forwarded
    Dec 7 07:47:28 - [VPN Log]: shutting down
    Dec 7 07:47:28 - IPSEC EVENT: KLIPS device ipsec0 shut down.
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: Starting Pluto (Openswan Version cvs2006Jan12_11:29:56 X.509-1.5.4 PLUTO_SENDS_VENDORID PLUTO_USES_KEYRR; Vendor ID OE@ECqImzhFD)
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: @(#) built on Aug 2 2007:11:09:37:
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: Setting NAT-Traversal port-4500 floating to on
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: port floating activation criteria nat_t=1/port_fload=1
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: including NAT-Traversal patch (Version 0.6c)
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: ike_alg_register_enc(): Activating OAKLEY_AES_CBC: Ok (ret=0)
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: starting up 1 cryptographic helpers
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: started helper pid=12590 (fd:5)
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: Using KLIPS IPsec interface code on 2.4.27-star
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: Changing to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts'
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: Changing to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts'
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: Changing to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts'
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: Changing to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/crls'
    Dec 7 07:47:31 - [VPN Log]: Warning: empty directory
    passthrough enabled, ports forwarded
    BLANK LOG!  Not a single entry in the WRVS4400N's log files.
    Remember, there is nothing wrong with my client or server software, as demonstrated by bypassing the WRVS4400N.  L2TP connections work fine until the WRVS4400N is in the mix. 
    So, I'm back to the same original question:
     How do I enable L2TP traffic to an L2TP server behind a WRVS4400N in a manner that actually works...? 
    Message Edited by DistortedLoop on 12-07-2008 08:02 AM

  • Connecting a WRVS4400N to a Dell Swtich

    Good Morning,
    I want to buy a WRVS4400N, but I need to know something before.
    The router will serve as an access point for 10 wireless station, 6 of them will run over Terminal server, the router will also serve 20 computer for the internet, so I want to Link aggregate the four LAN port to my swtich, I know how to do it on my Dell Powerconnect, but I want to know if the WRVS4400N will support it, there will be a lot of traffic going through the router so linking the 4 port in LAG mode to my Powerconnect swicth will speed up the communication !
    Thank you,
    P,S: Sorry for the multi post, I was lost in the cisco support site !
    Sylvain

    Sylvain,
    I wouldn't go with the WRVS4400N in the scenario you specified. the router doesn't do LAGS (any router in SBSC product line doesn't support LAGS) next if you're using an internal DHCP server , DHCP request will get sent to all Vlans on the 4400N which only cause problems when the router isn't handing out DHCP.
    That being said i would invest in a layer 3 switch ( SG300-10) would work fine. It supports LAGS - Vlans and capable of layer 3. ITS DOESN'T"t GIVE OUT DHCP so you'll need that. For the wireless clients i would get a actual AP (AP541N or Aironet series). This would be a better solution.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps10898/data_sheet_c78-610061.html
    You can draw us out a topology and we can give better solution, but from your post above this is the way i would go. Also if you want to give us a call @ 1-866-606-1866 and speak with next available engineer; we can assist in recommending devices that would work best for you. They can consult with a (SME) if needed.
    **Knowledge is power**
             Jasbryan

  • E51 Wlan Hidden SSID

    We have lately purchase a couple of N95 and a couple E51 handsets. At the office we have a Linksys 4400N Access Point configured for 802.11G with WPA and hidden SSID.
    The N95 handsets are able to connect with no problems whatsoever. The E51 however simply won't connect.
    I tried taking the E51 home and connect it to my Airport Extreme 802.11G/N with the same results. At home I also have a hidden ssid so I tried to unhide it, with the ssid visible the E51 connects immediately. Hiding the ssid again (and changing the setting to hidden on the e51) and the handset is again unable to connect!
    How is it that the N95 is able to connect and the E51 fails so miserably? I'd really prefer NOT to have to change the WiFi settings just because of a couple of handsets. Or simply say that for E51 users it just won't work.
    This issue is really bugging me, searching the net has only resulted in few hits on this specific issue. Here's hoping that it is I who's making some kind of mistake (I doubt that however since I configured the N95 and the E51 side by side).

    I was able to connect nokia e51 to WLAN with hidden SSID (I use WPA-PSK with AES).
    Just define the access point first and choose "Network status" as hidden.
    Here is short instruction from the manual:
    "Connection > Access points.
    2. Select Options > New access point to create a
    new access point, or select an existing access point
    from the list and then Options > Duplicate access
    point to use the access point as a basis for the new
    one.
    3. Define the following settings.
    • Connection name — Enter a descriptive name
    for the connection.
    • Data bearer — Select Wireless LAN.
    • WLAN network name — To enter the service
    set identifier (SSID), that is, the name that
    identifies the specific WLAN, select Enter
    manually. To select the network from the
    WLANs in range, select Search for networks.
    • Network status — Select Hidden if the network
    you are connecting to is hidden or Public if it is
    not hidden.
    • WLAN network mode — If you select
    Infrastructure, devices can communicate with
    each other and with wired LAN devices through
    a WLAN access point. If you select Ad-hoc,
    devices can send and receive data directly with
    each other, and no WLAN access point is needed.
    WLAN security mode — You must select the
    same security mode that is used in the WLAN
    access point. If you select WEP (wired equivalent
    privacy), 802.1x, or WPA/WPA2 (Wi-Fi protected
    access), you must also configure the relevant
    additional settings. See the device help for more
    information.
    • WLAN security settings — Edit the security
    settings for the selected security mode.
    • Homepage — Enter the web address of the page
    you want to display as the home page when you
    use this access point."
    BR,
    W.

  • WRV200 lockup worse with 1.0.39

    The WRV200 would lock about every 24 hours. Flash to 1.0.39 and I will be lucky to get this thread out before it requires a power cycle.  The DHCP function seems to be part of the issue. One look at the table and it seems this part was damaged in the new firmware.  The column for system name has the DHCP lease expiration time. Also the table rarely updates. It clears on each reboot and will not update until the lease is up.
    Quick VPN seems to be non functional on all my platforms now (WRV200 and the 4400N).
    Anyone else with these issues?

    Do a hard reset on the router.

Maybe you are looking for

  • New Itunes wont work!!! :-(

    I dont know whats going on, when i opened itunes it said that there was a new update and i was all like ya!!!....Not any more!!! When i was downloading the quick times part there was some errar and it said i could debug. so i did and everthing was fi

  • How do you change the Print Products Store from USA to UK like you can do in IPhoto?

    How do you change the Print Products Store from USA to UK like you can do in IPhoto?

  • Out of memmory with Sound object

    Hello, I have 2k+ of mp3 files and i need form playlist based on id3 tags. When i create air.Sound object in JS I run load() method and get ID3 tags in COMPLETE event handler. After that i create new Sound object for next file and all looks fine but

  • Initial view 2-up spreads with single cover page

    I hope I have this wrong and i'm missing something obvious but elusive: It seems like there is no way in the newest version of Acrobat to modify a generated multi-page PDF via preferences>page display so that on initial view it will show as spreads a

  • Ordering an iPhoto album from Macau

    Apparently I can't order an iPhoto album as I live in Macau. Used to have a Canadian CC so it wasn't a problem previously. Anyone know of a work-around?