2003 and 2010 Meeting Problem

I have a room with that was scheduled with a recurring meeting every Monday on Exchange 2010.
That same room was scheduled at the same time on exchange 2003. However, this was scheduled before the recurring meeting.
The problem is that the recurring meeting took precedence over the single meeting, even though the single meeting was scheduled first.
The exchange server is 2003.
How do I fix this issue, so that even if a recurring meeting is scheduled, the single meeting that was scheduled before is not canceled?
Is this an issue with 2010 vs 2003?

Hi,
Please run the following command to check the Calendar Attendant configuration on
this room mailbox:
Get-CalendarProcessing Room1 | FL
The ConflictPercentageAllowed parameter specifies the maximum percentage of meeting conflicts for new recurring meeting requests. We can read the results of the command to check it.
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Running Unity with both Exchange 2003 and 2010?

My company is planning to upgrade from Exchange 2003 to 2010. We are
currently using Unity 7.0. We'd like to run the two in parrallel for a bit and take our time switching users over.
Now I've read that Unity can support Exchange 2010, but I haven't found anything about running Unity using both Exchange 2003 and 2010 in parrallel.
Is this something Unity can handle?

We're doing something similar, but we have an in-place Unity 7 and Exchange 2003 environment; we are putting some users from an org we support on an Exchange 2010 server, but do not want that to be the partner server (yet). The instructions seem to point you to making 2010 the partner; I'm wondering why Step 13 (of your link) we are uninstalling the Exchange Server 2003 System Management Tools, if it’s a mixed environment and 2003 will still be the partner server. I also saw somewhere that you don’t have to move the unitymsgstoresvc account to Exchange 2010 if you are in a mixed environment. Is that true? Thank you.

After conecting to SQLexpress 2008r2 using ODBC, access 2003 and 2010 says conection failed.

After conecting to SQLexpress using ODBC MS access 2003 and 2010 says the conection failed with in the app. Not all users are having this issue. Unable to track down the cause. Any help would would be appearated.

With the miniscule of information you have given, it's not really possible to help you. At a very minimum, we need the complete error message you are getting, so that we can tell whether the reach the server and are denied access, or they don't even
come that far.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

Paragraph Alignment and Justification different in Word 2003 and 2010

Hi all,
We are migrating some letter templates from word 2003 to word 2010 for our system and we found a alignment problem in word 2010 (actually, it is not a problem and I think the behavior in 2010 is correct)
In word 2003, the following paragraph alignment will display like this :
"To enjoy your membership in our service center, please remit a payment of US$
123456789.00 per annual"
In word 2010, the following paragraph alignment will show like this
"To enjoy your membership in our service center, please remit a payment of
US$ 123456789.00 per annual"
(US$ 123456789.00 is shown on same line in 2010 but US$ and dollar amount are not
on the same line in 2003)
Although I think the paragraph alignment in 2010 is more reasonable, I still want to achieve back
the look in 2003 such that we can easily to compare results.
As in one post that I asked help in this forum, one expert shows me that there is option to set back the layout
look behavior in 2003, I guess if there are some advance settings to achieve this?
Please kindly advise to me on this.
Thanks in advance for your help,
Ray

There is a difference, but it turns out to be a "2-factor" one. As far as I can tell, "enabling an 'east asian' language for editing" is the other factor. When you create
a document with such a language enabled, wrapping of currency amounts works differently in Windows Word 2007 and later. Once created, the problem seems to occur even on copies of Word that only have (say) English enabled.
In Word 2003, having such a language enabled for editing appears to make no difference.
Whether "enabling of an 'east asian' language is the cause of the problem described by the OP, or the only thing that will result in such a difference, I cannot tell.
Here, I tested roughly as follows:
a. back up normal.dot/normal.dotm
a. open Word 2010 and ensure only English is enabled as an editing language
b. create a new document
c. Type
" $ a"
(space, $, 10 spaces, "a", no quotation marks).
d. Type text + spaces before that, until the "a" wraps onto the next line.
e. save and close that
f. enable (say) one of the Chinese languages for editing.
g. restart Word
h. repeat (b)-(d). This time, I think you will see that the $, 10 spaces and the "a" wrap as a unit.
i. Save that.
j. disable the East Asian language again and restart Word. Open each document and see how the wrapping behaves.
Here, I happen to have Chinese enabled as one of the editing languages in my copy of Word 2003 and I do not see the "wrap as a unit" behaviour in that case, or in either
of the two .doc fiels saved from Word 2010.
Here, the behaviour appeared to be the same whether I used $, £ (UK pound sign) or the Yen character symbol, but not the Euro currency symbol.
I saved my test files (including some created in Word 2003) in 2007 XML format and tried to pin down the significant difference. Per-dcoument compatibility settings
didn't seem to be involved. Changing the w:eastAsia language attribute in the following element in the styles.xml file was enough to change the behaviour:
<w:styles><w:docDefaults><w:rPrDefault><w:rPr><w:lang ...
Peter Jamieson

Public folders are not in sync after settting up Replicas between Exchange 2003 and 2010

I have setup Public Folder replicas between the 2 Exchange servers and I can see all the top and sub level folders.
For those mailboxes that were migrated over to Exchange 2010, I have noticied a lower number of item contents in these fodders when views from an Outlook client whose mailbox had been migrated over to Exchange 2010.
On Exchange 2003 System Manager, if I properties one of the Public Folders, under the Replicataion tab, I can see the old and new server there. On the Exchange server 2003 box, I can see the last update reviced was a few weeks ago.
I did see an option to synchronize content but I am not sure which server to run this one from. The Exchange 2003 or 2010 server.
There is also a Resend Changes... option. Should I use this instead?
Can anyone advise?

Hi,
The "Resend changes" and "Synchronize content" options in Exchange 2003 ESM are used to initiate hierarchy and content replication.
To update public folder hierarchy and content from Exchange 2010 side, you can use the following commands.
Update-PublicFolderHierarchy
Update-PublicFolder
Please run the Get-publicfolderstatistics cmdlet to get public folder details such as item count, this information will help you compare content replicated between the source and destination servers.
Besides, here is a blog about public folder replication troubleshooting for your reference.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2006/01/17/417611.aspx
Hope this is helpful to you.
Best regards,
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2003 and 2010 Co existing mode

Dear all
I migrated users from exchange server 2003 to 2010.
I can send mail to external domain but i does not receive from external domain and users receive error as 550 5.1.1 users unknown.
Please do the needful
Parthiban selvaraj

Dear all
I migrated users from exchange server 2003 to 2010.
I can send mail to external domain but i does not receive from external domain and users receive error as 550 5.1.1 users unknown.
Please do the needful
Parthiban selvaraj
Users unknown? That doesnt make any sense. Is the 2010 and 2003 server in the same forest? How did you migrate these users? What server is reporting the NDR? Please post the exact NDR ( and cover up the server and domain name if required)
Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

Need to use Office 97, XP, 2003 and 2010 on the same PC

Hello there,
I need to use different versions of office product on my PC, a winXP Sp3 box. I used Office 97, XP and 2003 so far without any trouble.
Now I installed Office 2010, taking care of the "leave previous Office versions" enabled during installation and to place the 2010 files in a "Office10" folder rather than the default one. Each Office suite has its own folder too.
From now I have this problem: starting any XP or 2003 application will show up the windows installer reconfiguration window, and this takes a lot of time until the application effectively starts. If then I wish to use a 2010 app, launching it will show
the office 2010 setup-reconfiguration window, so another couple of minutes of elaboration is needed until I can use my app.
Please someone can help me with this issue?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Multiple versions of Microsoft Office software can be installed, if you install earliest version of Office first. Following order of installation should allow error free usage of multiple Office software versions.
First - Microsoft Office XP
Second - Microsoft Office 2003
Third - 2007 Office suites and programs
Fourth - Microsoft Office 2010 suites (32-bit versions only)
Above order applies to installation of whole Microsoft Office suite and also individual Office programs on single Windows PC.
In your case, you have installed these apps successfully, but Windows Installer Appears Every Time when you start office XP or 2003, try this:
Open the Group Policy Editor by selecting Run from the Start Menu, and typing
gpedit.msc. (If the file is missing, run mmc.exe instead. Then, select
Add/Remove Snap-in from the Console menu, click
Add, and double-click Group Policy. Click
Finish, then Close, then Ok.)
Expand the following branches:
Local Computer Policy \ Computer Configuration \ Administrative Templates \ Windows Components \ Windows Installer
Double-click Disable Windows Installer to your right, click
Enabled, and choose Always from the list. Click Ok when you're done.
The change will take effect immediately. If you added a snap in, as described above, you don't need to "save changes to the console."
Note: If you encounter an error about the Administrator Policy the next time you try to install an application, you'll have to re-enable the Windows Installer temporarily.
Also you said "If then I wish to use a 2010 app, launching it will show the office 2010 setup-reconfiguration window". To work around this issue:
Open Run (Press Windows key + R) copy and paste the following commands one at a time and then press ENTER.
reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Word\Options /v NoReReg /t REG_DWORD /d 1
reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Excel\Options /v NoReReg /t REG_DWORD /d 1
reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Access\Options /v NoReReg /t REG_DWORD /d 1
NOTE: You should back-up the registry using the steps given
here before modification.

Access 2003 and 2010 Side-by-Side App-V 5

I have an issue here where I have Access 2003 sequenced and Access 2010 sequenced but they will not install alongside each other.
Both deploy (using CM2012) individually OK. But when deploying side-by-side I find that only one can be installed at once.
If Access 2003 is installed, when I select to install 2010 via the CM Software Centre it removes Access 2003. If Access 2010 is installed first, when installing 2003 it removes 2010.
I would like both installed at the same time but this behaviour is puzzling me. Has anyone else experienced this type of behaviour?
Cheers

Do your packages all have the same Package GUID? Perhaps your sequencer snapshot was saved with the machine turned on so that all packages you are creating have the same GUID? If so, always start from a snapshot with the machine in a shut down state.
Dan Gough - UK App-V MVP
Blog: packageology.com
Twitter: @packageologist
LinkedIn

Are there any known issues with speed between excel 2003 and 2010 when using WAAS?

Request asked by customer. Thought I would run this by the forum first.
Can you please raise a ticket with Cisco TAC asking why Excel files in 97-2003 file format cannot be fully optimized when compared to the same file being saved in the latest file format?
When using the latest file format, the user experience is amazing and up to 100x faster to open and save files. Our testing has identified an issue with the older file format.

I deployed WAAS about 3 years ago. Part of the deployment was before and after testing. When the users used Office 2010 the results were good. When they used Office 2003 the results were terrible. Some files took minutes to open, some never opened. Solution was to upgrade to O2010.
Hope this helps.

Exchange 2003 to 2010 SP3 migrate system PF

Hello.
We on the road to move to Exchange 2010 and i have a question
Which system PF i need to replicate to Exchange 2010
I have:
Offline address book:
/o=orgname=cn addrlists/cn=oabs/cn=Defaul Offline Address Book (which replicated between exch 2003 and 2010) and subfolders there:
OAB version 2 (replicated between 2003 and 2010)
OAB version 3a (replicated between 2003 and 2010)
OAB version 4 (replicated between 2003 and 2010)
EX:/o=sovbank/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT) (don't have any replica at all)
EX:/o=sovbank/ou=First Administrative Group (replicated between 2003 and 2010)
Shedule and Free Busy folder which contain subfolder:
EX:/o=sovbank/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT) (don't have any replica at all)
EX:/O=SOVBANK/OU=EXTERNAL (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT) (don't have any replica at all)
EX:/o=sovbank/ou=First Administrative Group (replicated between 2003 and 2010)
Question is - did i add all replica right?
Can i execute MoveAllReplica.ps1 or i miss something?
P.S. We don't use EFORM so i don't repicate it at all

Each time you create a new user mailbox, the user account receive the LegacyExchangeDN property.
This property is set only once and will match the administrative group that the mailbox server belong to.
In a Exchange 2003/2010 migration, your old user will have a legacyDN strting with EX:/o=sovbank/ou=First Administrative Group[..] while the user recently created in E2010 will have EX:/o=sovbank/ou=Exchange
Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT) [...]
So what is the link between this and the PF? The answer is outlook.
When an outlook client, with a mailbox hosted on E2003, create a meeting request with other users and check for the availability, that query is against the public folder Schedule freebusy folder of each users.
That folder is updated, by outlook, each time you create an appointement or accept a meeting request. In the background outlook "push" your free/busy status to his "local"public folder. see here
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996946(EXCHG.65).aspx
In E2010 native, the query are handled by the availability service however that service is not reachable by E2003, or outlook 2003, therefore for backward compatibility any outlook client (even outlook 2010) connected to an E2010 mailbox will also
"push" the free busy data to the local PF.
If you see "unable to read FREE busy data" when creating a meeting,between E2003 and E2010, that is because your local PF does not have a replica of that information for this user.
So to answer the question, yes the folder Shedule and Free busy -EX:/o=sovbank/ou=Exchange Administrative Group
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT) need to be replicated on all servers.

Migrating Users 2003 to 2010

We are currently running Exchange 2003 and 2010 in Co-Existence. I have been moving users from 2003 to 2010 and users from a particular Database (2003) are Completing With Errors. Users from every other store are moving successfully. The
comment of the move request is
Warning: Failed to clean up the source mailbox after the move.
Error details: MapiExceptionNotFound: Unable to delete mailbox. (hr=0x8004010f, ec=-2147221233)
The original error mailbox is marked for deletion on Exchange 2003 and the user is able to access on Exchange 2010.
I have researched this error and i believe Exchange 2003 will clean up the mailboxes after 30 days but i just want to try and confirm it. Also is there any maintenance i can run on the 2003 Store to stop this from happening?
Thanks

As long as you can access the new Exchange 2010 mailbox and mails are being received\sent, this error can be ignored. The source mailbox being left behind won't do any harm. It becomes a disconnected mailbox, which will be cleaned
up by the store after a while (the default is 30 days).
There is a known issue with Exchange 2003 and need to install a hot-fix
KB940012 so try after installing it.
OM (MCITP) | Blog

Migration Exchange 2003 to 2010 routing connector

Hello
At least we deside to migrate from 2003 to 2010 Exchange now i'm preparing and stuck around one question.
In our Exchange 2003 organization we have couple backend servers and one frontend on which OWA is installed.
OWA server placed to second routing group others backend server in first routing group.
Roitung group connected to each other by connector.
So the question - when i install CAS Exchange 2010 he asked me with which Exchange 2003 server i want to create connector - which server i should choose? Backend or Frontend which placed in different RG?

It doesn't really matter, it is a connector between your 2010 and 2003 servers.
You can choose the backend servers as it will reduce one hop in your case. Do make sure that you make the connector redundant by adding atleast two 2003 and 2010 servers as source and target servers in both connectors.
There will be two connectors - one from 2003 to 2010 and another from 2010 to 2003.

Exchange 2003 to 2010 Migration Active-Sync & OWA

I am in the process of migrating from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. I have a co-existence running currently. I have moved 1 mail box over to the new exchange server (a test account I created). I have 2 questions, one about OWA and the other about Active-Sync/Mobile
access.
1. When I log into my internal OWA site I can access the webmail just fine. However when I try to go to my external OWA site I get a HTTP Error 404. I have setup the weblink https://webmail.company.com in my external DNS record. However the internal link
says it is https://webmail.company.com/owa. Is there something additional that needs to be setup in IIS for the external site to work or only after the migration is completed?
2. I tried adding the account I migrated to my cell phone for mail but I just get a "Connection to server has failed" message. The internal and external link for mobile access is both the same and setup in external DNS https://mail.comapny.com.
Is this a feature that only works after the migration is completed? I have ports 80,443,143,25,993 open in my sonicwall for e-mail services. However the IP is still set to my old exchange server. Is it possible to have 2 settings the same in sonicwall with
2 different IP's? Last time I tried it with migrating my VPN neither VPN server worked after that.
Any help and insight would be greatly appreciated. I am new to systems administration and this is my first exchange migration

Hi,
Here are my answers you can refer to :
1. To deploy OWA in the Exchange 2003 and 2010 coexistence, we need a legacy namespace for the Exchange 2003 server.
For more information, you can refer to the following article:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2009/12/02/3408921.aspx
Additionally, for the 404 error, I recommend you check the IIS log to find the root cause:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943891
2. I recommend you deploy Exchange 2010 in the "Internet Facing AD Site" and Exchange 2003 server in the "Non-Internet facing AD site": set the external URL in CAS 2010 and point mail.company.com to Exchange 2010 server IP address.
For more information, you can refer to the following article:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2009/12/08/3408985.aspx
thanks,
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Unity 8.0 and Migrating Exchange 2003 to 2010

In the coming months I hope to be upgrading from Exchange 2003 (sp2) to Exchange 2010 (sp3) running on Windows Server 2012. I currently have Unity 8.0(3.1) running on Server 2003. We hope to be upgrading to Exchange 2013 at the end of the year if that is supported.
Before I contact my Cisco partner about this upgrade I would like to know what to expect. Any advice and suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Nick

The integration is completely different than with legacy Unity. High-level: Unity leverages MAPI integration and is completely dependent upon AD and Exchange to function properly. Hence, the schema extensions, Permissions Wizard (and associated permissions), and etc. Unity Connection leverages web-based APIs for integration. Specifically it uses WebDav for Exch 2003 and EWS for Exchange 2007/2010. It is a dual message store synchronization architecture, which means that 1) it can function independently without AD and/or Exchange integration and 2) no schema extensions and 3) less complicated permissions requirements. With Unity Connection, the users have a mailbox on the server and then a copy of that message is synchronized into the user's corporate Exchange mailbox. You get MWI synchronization between phone and email and etc (hence, you get Unified Messaging). Another nice thing is that you can handle requirements for voicemail only scenarios locally on Unity Connection without having to create dummy or "resource" AD/Exchange accounts in the corporate systems. You can read up more on this integration here and hit me back up if you have questions. I'll be glad to help if I can.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/unified_messaging/guide/85xcucumg010.html
As for the fax part, OK - that's a problem in your scenario. Personally, I've never been a big fan of using Unity for that (and don't) but then again, I don't really like "fax" anyway. Personal opinions aside, I'll go with relay of facts. Unity Connection supports integration with 3rd-party fax systems. You can take a look at that here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/design/guide/8xcucdg080.pdf
In terms of Unity though, the reality is that it's days are (and have been) numbered. See below:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6789/ps5745/ps6509/end_of_life_notice_c51-681593.html
Hailey
Please rate helpful posts!

Can not open multiple excel 2003 and excel 2007 files in excel 2010 - message says they may be a security risk and wants to do a scan

We use about 20 excel files to build a consolidated financial statement for our company. Some of the files were built when the computers were running 2003 and some when we had 2007. We are being upgraded to Windows 7 with Office 2010. In
2007, we would simply highlight all the files in a folder, right click, and open. Once they had all refreshed for new data, we would close them all. Now with Excel 2010, we've highlighted all the files, but when we right click, we get a message
that says some files may present an internet security risk. Then it ask if we want to open anyway. If we say yes, we get a box that asks us to scan the files. We've done a scan, but at the end it still doesn't open the files. If we
say no, it does nothing. Either way, we're not getting the files open except to open them 1 by 1. We're not sure how to get rid of this...any suggestions?

In Excel 2010 setting those documents as trusted documents, or adding the folder containing as a trusted location may do the trick for you. There's a full description of what it does here
http://blogs.technet.com/b/office2010/archive/2009/09/28/trusted-documents.aspx but if you go into File, Options, Trust Center, Trust Center Settings..., and then Trusted Locations, you'll see the list of currently configured file paths that are considered
trusted on your machine.
At the bottom of that window you can check the option to allow trusted locations on the network (so you can trust the files that I assume are stored on a network location) and then add the location of those files to the list.
Note, this setting is done per machine profile, so if it does the trick for you then each person needing these files would need to do this. Also, keep in mind that by doing this you're removing some of the protections added into Excel, so you should only
go adding locations you know you can trust (not just the root of a network path where anyone and everyone might go saving spreadsheets they've downloaded form the internet).

2003 and 2010 Meeting Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for