280x x2-x3 performance drops

my system is i7 4770k, giga z87-hd3, 16gb ram, win 7 x64 and msi gaming 280x
Some time ago i saw, what i have big performance drops time by time after loading new levels in game, or reloading save, or just alt-tab in windows and comeback in game (game not important - it can happy in any 3d game). Its happen randomly and can be fixed with just another loading, or alt-tab in win and comeback in 3d game. Other words - every time in game, after im switch to 2D and back in 3D im have chance of very slow mode or all can be again work as it should. Its not deadly but annoying
Im monithor this by GPU-Z and afterburner - and im not saw no any drops of clock of gpu or gpu loading. No any themeprature problem (all stay cool). No any problems with free memory or something. Im also chek in GPU-Z when game runing in - PICE mode is stay 16x 3.0 both in "normal" and "slow" mode.
Not sure its just two "mode" - subjectivly, it can be "normal-fast as it should", "slowly then it should" and "slow as hell"
one thing im remember - several months ago on this forum i requested and received new bios for my 280x (fixed high vcom temperature issue). Im not sure, but maybe this random performance start after this bios. MAybe it have new bios? Or any help how i can fix this problems. thanks.

Quote from: Nichrome on 13-July-14, 19:07:12
Gaming App - it's MSI's software. Unless your graphics card is more of "standard" rather than Gaming edition?
If possible, try your card in different computer and see if there are loss of performance too.
Also, contact Gigabyte asking for newest BIOS for your board.
And make vBIOS request here for your GPU, providing Serial Number (you can dismiss last 3 characters) and copy of current vBIOS (use GPU-Z to make copy, upload it to some file hosting service and give a link here).
Im tryed gaming apps and afterburner - not effect, of curse.
My bios is up to date but my motherboard have a bug with random BSODs. This bsods very rare - about 1 in the week and absolutly random, so i cant show this problem in service center of shop for immidatly replacing.
Im dont sure this perfromance problem from motherboard as BSOD too. But it possible.

Similar Messages

SQL performance drops after 20 mins

Hello,
I am using Oracle Version 9.2.0.5
I have an SQL query that starts off fast but the performance drops after running for 20 mins. It continues to drop till a point where it becomes painfully slow.
The query is as attached below:
SELECT      /*+ INDEX (abe ASR_I_BID_PRD_TOD_5FAX)
INDEX (aae ASR_I_AE_RC_BR)
INDEX (ab ASR_UK_BASES)
INDEX (aaac ASR_I_AFAC_SP)
+*/aae.f8_code
||','||     aae.sector
||','||     aae.ouc
||','||     aae.rule_type
||','||     aae.base_ref
||','||     aae.prodlist_ref
||','|| aaac.L101
||','|| aaac.L201
||','|| aaac.L301
||','|| aaac.L401
||','|| aaac.L501
||','|| aaac.L601
||','|| aaac.L701
||','|| aaac.L801
||','|| aaac.L802
||','|| aaac.L830
||','|| aaac.L850
||','|| aaac.L870
||','|| aaac.L901
||','|| aaac.L1001
||','||     LTRIM(TO_CHAR((aae.disaggregated_amount*abe.percentage*aaac.chain_perc)/10000,'999999999999999.99'))
FROM asr_owner.asr_account_entries aae
, asr_owner.asr_base_elements_5fax abe
, asr_ff_audit_chains aaac
, asr_owner.asr_bases ab
WHERE aae.run_code = '5fax'
AND ab.run_code = aae.run_code
AND ab.base_type = aaac.base_type
AND ab.base_id = abe.base_id
AND ab.base_ref = aae.base_ref
AND aaac.base_type = 'L'
AND aaac.business <> 'R'
AND aae.trans_type IN ('A','C','D')
AND abe.base_id = aae.base_id
AND 100*(abe.exhaust_level)+abe.exhaust_sub_level = 101
AND aaac.start_prod = abe.product
AND ABS((aae.disaggregated_amount*abe.percentage*aaac.chain_perc)/10000) >= 0.01
It has huge number of records. I have checked all join conditions and they are all fine.
asr_owner.asr_account_entries - 3.6 millions rows
asr_owner.asr_base_elements_5fax - 1.8 million rows
asr_ff_audit_chains - 5.8 million rows
asr_owner.asr_bases - 0.5 million rows
The autotrace and plan are as follows
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
5264 consistent gets
3522 physical reads
0 redo size
525 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
456 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
5 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
0 rows processed
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 83 | 13529 | 12465 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ASR_FF_AUDIT_CHAINS | 83 | 6225 | 617 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 83 | 13529 | 12465 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 88 | 11848 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2201 | 113K| 3044 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ASR_BASES | 774 | 13158 | 722 |
| 6 | INDEX FULL SCAN | ASR_UK_BASES | 104K| | 104 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ASR_ACCOUNT_ENTRIES | 3 | 108 | 3 |
| 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ASR_I_AE_RC_BR | 8 | | 1 |
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ASR_BASE_ELEMENTS_5FAX | 1 | 35 | 4 |
| 10 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ASR_I_BID_PRD_TOD_5FAX | 1 | | 3 |
| 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ASR_I_AFAC_SP | 8241 | | 9 |
Note: cpu costing is off, PLAN_TABLE' is old version
19 rows selected.
I have also tried without the hints and the plan looks like
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 83 | 13529 | 679 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ASR_FF_AUDIT_CHAINS | 83 | 6225 | 617 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 83 | 13529 | 679 |
| 3 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 88 | 370 |
| 4 | HASH JOIN | | 2201 | 113K| 208 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ASR_BASES | 774 | 13158 | 16 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ASR_ACCOUNT_ENTRIES | 12125 | 426K| 191 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ASR_BASE_ELEMENTS_5FAX | 18325 | 626K| 161 |
| 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ASR_I_AFAC_SP | 8241 | | 9 |
Note: cpu costing is off, PLAN_TABLE' is old version
16 rows selected.
I have tried increasing the hash_area_size parameter to 20MB (it is currently 10MB).
I have tried setting the tuning parameters like optimizer_index_cost_adj but to no success.
Could you please help.

Thanks a lot for all the help.
Here is another query that is running quite slow. Any help on this might be helpful
EXPLAIN PLAN SET statement_id = 'auditextract' FOR
SELECT /*+NO_INDEX(aaac)
       NO_INDEX(aae)
       NO_INDEX(abe)
       NO_INDEX(ab)
       NO_INDEX(agp)+*/
     aae.run_code
,     aae.f8_code
,     aae.sector
,     aae.ouc
,     aae.rule_type
,     aae.base_ref
,     aae.prodlist_ref
,     aae.trans_type
,     aaac.base_type
,DECODE(NVL(aaac.exhaust_chain,'NULL'),'NULL',',',NULL)||aaac.exhaust_chain||
DECODE(NVL(aaac.exhaust_chain,'NULL'),'NULL',NULL,',')||LTRIM(RTRIM(aaac.final_prod))||
            RPAD(',',14-DECODE(aaac.final_level,1001,14,901,13,870,12,850,11,830,10,802,9,801,8,701,7,601,6,501,5,401,4,301,3,201,2,101,1),',') exhaust_chain,
     aaac.final_level     ,
     aaac.business ,
     L101,
     L101_TOD,
     L201,
     L201_TOD,
     L301,
     L301_TOD,
     L401,
     L401_TOD,
     L501,
     L501_TOD,
     L601,
     L601_TOD,
     L701,
     L701_TOD,
     L801,
     L801_TOD,
     L802,
     L802_TOD,
     L830,
     L830_TOD,
     L850,
     L850_TOD,
     L870,
     L870_TOD,
     L901,
     L901_TOD,
     L1001,
     L1001_TOD,
     (aae.disaggregated_amount*abe.percentage*aaac.chain_perc)/10000 money
FROM   asr_owner.asr_account_entries aae
,      asr_owner.asr_base_elements_5fax abe
,      asr_owner.asr_bases ab
,      ASR_FF_AUDIT_CHAINS aaac
WHERE aae.run_code    = '5fax'
AND    ab.run_code = aae.run_code
AND    abe.run_code = ab.run_code
AND    ab.base_type = aaac.base_type
AND    ab.base_id = abe.base_id
AND    aaac.base_type = 'L'
AND    aaac.business = 'R'
AND    ab.base_ref = aae.base_ref
AND    aae.trans_type IN ('A','C','D','G','J')
AND    abe.base_id     = aae.base_id
AND    abe.exhaust_level = 1
AND    abe.exhaust_sub_level = 1
AND    aaac.start_prod = abe.product
AND    NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
                    FROM asr_group_prods agp
                    WHERE agp.product_group IN ('SW500','SR500','G176')
                    AND (aaac.L101 = agp.product OR
                              aaac.L201 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L301 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L401 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L501 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L601 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L701 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L801 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L802 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L830 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L850 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L870 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L901 = agp.product OR
                                 aaac.L1001 = agp.product))
AND    abs((aae.disaggregated_amount*abe.percentage*aaac.chain_perc)) >= 100
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation             | Name                   | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |                         |   571 |   112K| 5586 |
|* 1 | FILTER               |                         |       |       |       |
|* 2 |   HASH JOIN           |                         |   571 |   112K| 5586 |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN          |                         |    53 | 5406 |   370 |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN         |                         | 2974 |   177K|   178 |
|* 5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL| ASR_BASES               |   770 | 15400 |    16 |
|* 6 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL| ASR_BASE_ELEMENTS_5FAX | 26178 | 1048K|   161 |
|* 7 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL | ASR_ACCOUNT_ENTRIES     | 17739 |   710K|   191 |
|* 8 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL | ASR_FF_AUDIT_CHAINS     |   126K|    12M| 5215 |
|* 9 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL   | ASR_GROUP_PRODS         |     1 |    10 |     2 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter( NOT EXISTS (SELECT /*+ */ 0 FROM "ASR_GROUP_PRODS" "AGP" WHERE
              ("AGP"."PRODUCT_GROUP"='G176' OR "AGP"."PRODUCT_GROUP"='SR500' OR
              "AGP"."PRODUCT_GROUP"='SW500') AND ("AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B1 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B2
              OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B3 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B4 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B5 OR
              "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B6 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B7 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B8 OR
              "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B9 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B10 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B11 OR
              "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B12 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B13 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B14)))
   2 - access("SYS_ALIAS_14"."START_PROD"="ABE"."PRODUCT")
       filter(ABS("AAE"."DISAGGREGATED_AMOUNT"*"ABE"."PERCENTAGE"*"SYS_ALIAS_14".
              "CHAIN_PERC")>=100)
   3 - access("AB"."BASE_REF"="AAE"."BASE_REF" AND
              "ABE"."BASE_ID"="AAE"."BASE_ID")
   4 - access("AB"."BASE_ID"="ABE"."BASE_ID")
   5 - filter("AB"."RUN_CODE"='5fax' AND "AB"."BASE_TYPE"='L')
   6 - filter("ABE"."RUN_CODE"='5fax' AND "ABE"."EXHAUST_LEVEL"=1 AND
              "ABE"."EXHAUST_SUB_LEVEL"=1)
   7 - filter("AAE"."RUN_CODE"='5fax' AND ("AAE"."TRANS_TYPE"='A' OR
              "AAE"."TRANS_TYPE"='C' OR "AAE"."TRANS_TYPE"='D' OR "AAE"."TRANS_TYPE"='G' OR
              "AAE"."TRANS_TYPE"='J'))
   8 - filter("SYS_ALIAS_14"."BASE_TYPE"='L' AND "SYS_ALIAS_14"."BUSINESS"='R')
   9 - filter(("AGP"."PRODUCT_GROUP"='G176' OR "AGP"."PRODUCT_GROUP"='SR500' OR
              "AGP"."PRODUCT_GROUP"='SW500') AND ("AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B1 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B2
              OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B3 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B4 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B5 OR
              "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B6 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B7 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B8 OR
              "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B9 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B10 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B11 OR
              "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B12 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B13 OR "AGP"."PRODUCT"=:B14))
Note: cpu costing is off
47 rows selected.

MacBook Pro late 2011 Battery Performance drop dramatically

MacBook Pro late 2011 Battery Performance drop dramatically
9 months 94 cycles and its health is now at 89%

Does the system still run off the battery only? Does it run for a few hours off the battery only? Then No it is not defective and no Apple will do nothing for you and No Applecare does not cover Consumable items which the battery is one of those.
The only time Apple MAY, and that is BIG MAY, replace the battery is within the first year and only if Apple Deems the battery to be defective. Fat chance of that as long as the system runs off the battery for any length of time.

Performance drop after new hardrive,

the performance dropped drasticly after a I superdupered yje old Hardrive to the new disc.
not only in Pro logic but also in Ableton Live....?
any ideas....
thx Daniel

What I meant was that many hard drives come formatted for Windows and need to be reformatted for Apple machines, but you've certainly found the answer in your drive's speed.

Unexpected performance drop/temperature rises

Mid 2012 Macbook Pro
2.3Ghz intel i7
4GB 1600MHz DDR3
Intel HD Graphics 4000 1024MB
Non retina (1440x900)
I have windows 8 installed (using bootcamp)
Using osx Yosemite
The issue:
Recently, my mac has been overheating to the point of it being far too hot to touch, and while using demanding applications I have experienced large performance drops. I have been using these applications for a long time, and this is only a recent development. I've tried running diagnostics, but for some reason was unable to connect to the internet via wifi or cable. In an attempt to increase ventilation, I've had the back of my macbook (where the fan exits are) propped up slightly on a book. This has done nothing to reduce operating temperatures. The performance drops have also impacted less demanding applications, such as chrome. I think that there is an issue with the cooling system, but I'm not sure if that's the issue. Does anyone have any idea what might be causing this, and if I can fix it? Also, my mac is still covered by my AppleCare extended warranty.

nickp7 wrote:
Also, my mac is still covered by my AppleCare extended warranty.
Great! Make an appointment at an Apple store genius bar.
In the mean time I suggest that you open the MBP and see if there is dirt and debris inside. Look especially at the fan. If so clean it out. You will need a #00 PHILLIPS driver.
You might also consider installing iStat menus and see exactly what temperatures you are experiencing:
http://bjango.com/mac/istatmenus/
Try on start up OPTION+D and see if that will engage the Apple Hardware Test.
Ciao.

Performance drop around 20% after adding an index

Hi,
I have an xml file (around 300 Kb, 3500 Nodes), the application internal works with dbxml handles but for display purposes I need xpaths for each node. First I was calculating them on request, but for requests with a lot of nodes it just takes too long (also memory usage was a big issue). In order to improve the performance I'm building a kind of metadata file after the import of the original document. The structure of this metadata file is:
<data>
    <node idx:id="<berkeley dbxml node handle>">
        <xpath>...here some xpath...</xpath>
    </node>
</data>That improved significantly the memory usage, but the response time is still a little bit below acceptable. Now I've thought, that adding an index to that metadata file would do it, BUT it doubled the response time. In the shell (with a much simpler query) the performance drop is around 20%.
Query in the shell:
doc("container.dbxml/test.xml.metadata")/data/node[@idx:id="BgIBBQAO"]/xpathQueryPlan without index:
<XQuery>
<DbXmlNav>
    <QueryPlanFunction result="document" container="container.dbxml">
      <OQPlan>D(node-metadata-equality-string,name:http://www.sleepycat.com/2002/dbxml,=,'test.xml.metadata',U)</OQPlan>
    </QueryPlanFunction>
    <DbXmlStep axis="child" name="data" nodeType="element"/>
    <DbXmlStep axis="child" name="node" nodeType="element"/>
    <DbXmlFilter>
      <DbXmlCompare name="equal" join="attribute" prefix="idx" uri="http://www.xyz.de/dnb/index" name="id" nodeType="attribute">
        <Sequence>
          <AnyAtomicTypeConstructor value="BgIBBQAO" typeuri="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" typename="string"/>
        </Sequence>
      </DbXmlCompare>
    </DbXmlFilter>
    <DbXmlStep axis="child" name="xpath" nodeType="element"/>
</DbXmlNav>
</XQueryQueryPlan with index.
<XQuery>
<DbXmlNav>
    <QueryPlanFunction result="document" container="container.dbxml">
      <OQPlan>D(node-metadata-equality-string,name:http://www.sleepycat.com/2002/dbxml,=,'test.xml.metadata',V(node-attribute-equality-string,@id:http://www.xyz.de/dnb/index,=,'BgIBBQAO'))</OQPlan>
    </QueryPlanFunction>
    <DbXmlStep axis="child" name="data" nodeType="element"/>
    <DbXmlStep axis="child" name="node" nodeType="element"/>
    <DbXmlFilter>
      <DbXmlCompare name="equal" join="attribute" prefix="idx" uri="http://www.makrolog.ag/dnb/index" name="id" nodeType="attribute">
        <OQPlan>V(node-attribute-equality-string,@id:http://www.xyz.de/dnb/index,=,'BgIBBQAO')</OQPlan>
        <Sequence>
          <AnyAtomicTypeConstructor value="BgIBBQAO" typeuri="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" typename="string"/>
        </Sequence>
      </DbXmlCompare>
    </DbXmlFilter>
    <DbXmlStep axis="child" name="xpath" nodeType="element"/>
</DbXmlNav>
</XQueryChanging query to
doc("container.dbxml/test.xml.metadata")//node[@idx:id="BgIBBQAO"]/xpathslows down the query more than adding the index.
In my application I've also tried setIndexNodes(true) on my container, the response time increased by factor 10... Am I doing something wrong?
Please tell me, if you need more information.
Best regards,
Wadim
Berkeley DBXML 2.3.10 (Patches 1-9, Patches 1-2 Berkeley DB)
Java 1.6
WinXP Pro SP2

In my application, without fetching the metadata a query for 10 nodes takes 6ms, with fetching the metadata 6s (so around 1000 times slower).
I could go down to 4.5s after changing:
declare variable $METADATA := doc(concat($CONTAINER,'/',$DOCUMENT,'.metadata'))/data;and then in the function:
distinct-values($METADATA/node[@idx:id = $id]/xpath)to:
declare variable $METADATA := concat($CONTAINER,'/',$DOCUMENT,'.metadata');and in the function:
doc($METADATA)/data/node[@idx:id = $id]/xpath I've also seen dbxml:lookup-attribute-index function, but calling ist like this
dbxml:lookup-attribute-index($CONTAINER,"id")[1]results in:
# An unexpected error has been detected by Java Runtime Environment:
# EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=0x1038d7d4, pid=976, tid=3664
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.6.0_03-b05 mixed mode, sharing)
# Problematic frame:
# C [libdbxml23.dll+0x7d7d4]
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
#   http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp
--------------- T H R E A D ---------------
Current thread (0x00386c00): JavaThread "main" [_thread_in_native, id=3664]
siginfo: ExceptionCode=0xc0000005, reading address 0x00000054
Registers:
EAX=0x00000000, EBX=0x103e7894, ECX=0xbcfa7f2b, EDX=0x65860002
ESP=0x003eeaf4, EBP=0x1086580c, ESI=0x10732c70, EDI=0x00000000
EIP=0x1038d7d4, EFLAGS=0x00010206
Top of Stack: (sp=0x003eeaf4)
0x003eeaf4:   bcfa7f7b 00000000 10736a18 003eec08
0x003eeb04:   10747248 104d87d8 109110b4 120ace18
0x003eeb14:   120ad55c 107c0ffc 10732c70 bcf812d7
0x003eeb24:   10732c70 003eec3c 003eec9c 00000040
0x003eeb34:   103e226c 00000000 00000000 00000000
0x003eeb44:   00000000 00000000 10880c01 00000000
0x003eeb54:   00000000 00000000 00000000 1089af01
0x003eeb64:   10880c68 10747c20 00000001 00000000
Instructions: (pc=0x1038d7d4)
0x1038d7c4:   24 40 8b e8 e8 33 23 fc ff 8b 84 24 b0 00 00 00
0x1038d7d4:   8b 4f 54 6a 00 8d 54 24 44 52 50 c7 84 24 b4 00
Stack: [0x003a0000,0x003f0000), sp=0x003eeaf4, free space=314k
Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
C [libdbxml23.dll+0x7d7d4]
Java frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code)
j com.sleepycat.dbxml.dbxml_javaJNI.XmlResults_next__SWIG_0(J)J+0
j com.sleepycat.dbxml.XmlResults.next()Lcom/sleepycat/dbxml/XmlValue;+4
j de.makrolog.dbxml.DBXMLDao.processQuery(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String;+139
j de.dnb.edith.DBXMLIndicesTest.testIndices()V+183
v ~StubRoutines::call_stub
j sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Ljava/lang/reflect/Method;Ljava/lang/Object;[Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;+0
j sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Ljava/lang/Object;[Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;+87
j sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Ljava/lang/Object;[Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;+6
j java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Ljava/lang/Object;[Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;+161
j junit.framework.TestCase.runTest()V+108
j junit.framework.TestCase.runBare()V+7
j junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect()V+4
j junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(Ljunit/framework/Test;Ljunit/framework/Protectable;)V+1
j junit.framework.TestResult.run(Ljunit/framework/TestCase;)V+18
j junit.framework.TestCase.run(Ljunit/framework/TestResult;)V+2
j junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(Ljunit/framework/Test;Ljunit/framework/TestResult;)V+2
j junit.framework.TestSuite.run(Ljunit/framework/TestResult;)V+37
j org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.junit3.JUnit3TestReference.run(Lorg/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/runner/TestExecution;)V+40
j org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run([Lorg/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/runner/ITestReference;)V+17
j org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests([Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Lorg/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/runner/TestExecution;)V+61
j org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(Lorg/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/runner/TestExecution;)V+10
j org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run()V+70
j org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main([Ljava/lang/String;)V+14
v ~StubRoutines::call_stub
--------------- P R O C E S S ---------------
Java Threads: ( => current thread )
0x02d6c800 JavaThread "ReaderThread" [_thread_in_native, id=1080]
0x029cdc00 JavaThread "Low Memory Detector" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=3816]
0x029c9000 JavaThread "CompilerThread0" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=3152]
0x029c8000 JavaThread "Attach Listener" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=2304]
0x029c7000 JavaThread "Signal Dispatcher" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=3244]
0x029c2000 JavaThread "Finalizer" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=2824]
0x029bdc00 JavaThread "Reference Handler" daemon [_thread_blocked, id=2248]
=>0x00386c00 JavaThread "main" [_thread_in_native, id=3664]
Other Threads:
0x029bc800 VMThread [id=1528]
0x029d8400 WatcherThread [id=3836]
VM state:not at safepoint (normal execution)
VM Mutex/Monitor currently owned by a thread: None
Heap
def new generation   total 960K, used 268K [0x228e0000, 0x229e0000, 0x22dc0000)
eden space 896K, 23% used [0x228e0000, 0x229138d0, 0x229c0000)
from space 64K, 96% used [0x229c0000, 0x229cf7a0, 0x229d0000)
to   space 64K,   0% used [0x229d0000, 0x229d0000, 0x229e0000)
tenured generation   total 4096K, used 572K [0x22dc0000, 0x231c0000, 0x268e0000)
   the space 4096K, 13% used [0x22dc0000, 0x22e4f0a8, 0x22e4f200, 0x231c0000)
compacting perm gen total 12288K, used 1342K [0x268e0000, 0x274e0000, 0x2a8e0000)
   the space 12288K, 10% used [0x268e0000, 0x26a2f840, 0x26a2fa00, 0x274e0000)
    ro space 8192K, 62% used [0x2a8e0000, 0x2ade14a8, 0x2ade1600, 0x2b0e0000)
    rw space 12288K, 52% used [0x2b0e0000, 0x2b727278, 0x2b727400, 0x2bce0000)
Dynamic libraries:
0x00400000 - 0x00423000      C:\Programme\Java\jre1.6.0_03\bin\javaw.exe
0x7c910000 - 0x7c9c7000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll
0x7c800000 - 0x7c907000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll
0x77da0000 - 0x77e4a000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\ADVAPI32.dll
0x77e50000 - 0x77ee1000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\RPCRT4.dll
0x7e360000 - 0x7e3f0000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\USER32.dll
0x77ef0000 - 0x77f37000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\GDI32.dll
0x76330000 - 0x7634d000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\IMM32.DLL
0x7c340000 - 0x7c396000      C:\Programme\Java\jre1.6.0_03\bin\msvcr71.dll
0x6d7c0000 - 0x6da0a000      C:\Programme\Java\jre1.6.0_03\bin\client\jvm.dll
0x76af0000 - 0x76b1e000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\WINMM.dll
0x6d310000 - 0x6d318000      C:\Programme\Java\jre1.6.0_03\bin\hpi.dll
0x76bb0000 - 0x76bbb000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\PSAPI.DLL
0x6d770000 - 0x6d77c000      C:\Programme\Java\jre1.6.0_03\bin\verify.dll
0x6d3b0000 - 0x6d3cf000      C:\Programme\Java\jre1.6.0_03\bin\java.dll
0x6d7b0000 - 0x6d7bf000      C:\Programme\Java\jre1.6.0_03\bin\zip.dll
0x6d570000 - 0x6d583000      C:\Programme\Java\jre1.6.0_03\bin\net.dll
0x71a10000 - 0x71a27000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\WS2_32.dll
0x77be0000 - 0x77c38000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\msvcrt.dll
0x71a00000 - 0x71a08000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\WS2HELP.dll
0x719b0000 - 0x719f0000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\mswsock.dll
0x66710000 - 0x66769000      C:\WINDOWS\system32\hnetcfg.dll
0x719f0000 - 0x719f8000      C:\WINDOWS\System32\wshtcpip.dll
0x13000000 - 0x1301e000      C:\dbxml-2.3.10\libdb_java45.dll
0x03410000 - 0x034e4000      C:\dbxml-2.3.10\libdb45.dll
0x78130000 - 0x781cb000      C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.VC80.CRT_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_8.0.50727.762_x-ww_6b128700\MSVCR80.dll
0x7c420000 - 0x7c4a7000      C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.VC80.CRT_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_8.0.50727.762_x-ww_6b128700\MSVCP80.dll
0x10270000 - 0x102f8000      C:\dbxml-2.3.10\libdbxml_java23.dll
0x10310000 - 0x1043f000      C:\dbxml-2.3.10\libdbxml23.dll
0x12000000 - 0x121cf000      C:\dbxml-2.3.10\xerces-c_2_7.dll
0x10460000 - 0x106a5000      C:\dbxml-2.3.10\xqilla10.dll
VM Arguments:
java_command: org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner -version 3 -port 2476 -testLoaderClass org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.junit3.JUnit3TestLoader -loaderpluginname org.eclipse.jdt.junit.runtime -classNames de.dnb.edith.DBXMLIndicesTest
Launcher Type: SUN_STANDARD
Environment Variables:
JAVA_HOME=C:\Programme\Java\jdk1.6.0_03
PATH=C:\Programme\Java\jre1.6.0_03\bin\client;C:\Programme\Java\jre1.6.0_03\bin;C:\WINDOWS\system32;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;C:\Programme\Gemeinsame Dateien\GTK\2.0\bin;C:\Programme\Java\jdk1.6.0_03\bin;C:\dbxml-2.3.10;
USERNAME=wadim
OS=Windows_NT
PROCESSOR_IDENTIFIER=x86 Family 15 Model 6 Stepping 5, GenuineIntel
--------------- S Y S T E M ---------------
OS: Windows XP Build 2600 Service Pack 2
CPU:total 2 (2 cores per cpu, 1 threads per core) family 15 model 6 stepping 5, cmov, cx8, fxsr, mmx, sse, sse2, sse3
Memory: 4k page, physical 2095520k(701180k free), swap 4194303k(3631216k free)
vm_info: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.6.0_03-b05) for windows-x86, built on Sep 24 2007 22:24:33 by "java_re" with unknown MS VC++:1310

Big performance drop migrating to Kodo 4.1 (Why would Kodo refuse to batch inserts in certain tables)

Hello,
While migrating from Kodo 3.4 to Kodo 4.1, I noticed significant drop in
insert performance. I traced it down to some strange batching behavior.
While most of the PCs were committed with batched inserts one particular
class refused to batch and would insert row by row resulting in 10 times
performance drop.
There is nothing special about the class. Its hierarchy is mapped on base
its table except for one of the lowest members which is mapped vertically.
Thank you very much
Alex Roytman
Peace Technology, Inc.
301-206-9696x103

See my post "My experience migrating Kodo 3.4 to 4.1"
"Stefan Hansel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Abe White wrote:
This case is being handled elsewhere, but for the benefit of others:
Kodo 4 works around a date/timestamp batching bug in some Oracle drivers
by not batching rows with date/timestamp columns.-------------
Abe could you get a bit deeper into it ?
It sounds like kodo 3 was batching that rows and had no problem with it ?
We only ship with the suggested oracle driver 10.2.0.1.0.
50% of our customers use oracle, so it would be a pity if performance
drops.
Alex ... it sounds like you successfully migrated to kodo4.
Could you give a short summery on how 'difficult' it was in the end ?
From the docs it sounds very easy (except the sentence 'Many
confniguration
properties and defaults have changed.') but from the newsgroups it sounds
as if
you'd struggle a bit.
I'm about to schedule our migration for the first quarter of 2007 and any
hint
helping use to estimate the time will help us.
If you compare with migration from kodo 2 to 3 ... is it easier or worse ?

HT201364 Is ther any performance drops once OS X Mavericks is installed on Late 2008 Macbook (Aluminum Unibody)?

Is ther any performance drops once OS X Mavericks is installed on Late 2008 Macbook (Aluminum Unibody)?

I just installed it on mine last night and noticed that the fans basically don't stop running when I have any programs running...Pretty disappointed in that, but hoping something will make it go away.

Any performance drop with a retina display?

Hi!
I'd love to buy a Macbook Pro 15" Retina Display but knowing that retina renders a very higher resolution, is there any performance drop in comparison with a normal Macbook Pro?
I'm a developer and I wonder if a Retina display would be a good idea? Is it softer for the eyes?
Thanks!

I use my 4-month old, 2012 Retina Macbook Pro for music applications, presentations, and graphic design.
This computer is leaps & bounds above the competition in performance and convenience. I expect it to last me a very long time!
On that note, keep in mind some of the new Oct. 2013 15" rMBP's do not have an NVIDIA Graphics Card. In my opinion, having this component in the computer is crucial as a developer!
If I were you, I'd shop for a refurbished 15" rMBP, as I did. As I see it, I saved $500+ getting a brand new state-of-the-art computer in a different type of box.

Wifi performance drops after connecting dualshock 3 via bluetooth

As the title says, when i sync my dualshock 3 control via bluetooth to my sgp321, wifi performance drops from 50 mbps to 8 mbps or less....
I've tried all the common "solutions" given, from pccompanion restoring to put the router in the fridge with a potato nailed on the wifi antenna during a week, starting on Halloweens night...
Could i have a sony expertise answering about this issue???
Regards.

Could it be that you have your WiFi and Bluetooth in same frequency band? Any chance you can try WiFi on the 802.11n band? or try changing channels of your WiFi router? I don't think you can change your Bluetooth. Frequencies... I believe WiFi on "n" operates at 5 ghz as opposed to bluetooth operating in 2.4 ghz band... that way less chance of interference

Does daisy chained firewires make performance drop?

Hi all, just looking for a quick answer by someone who knows what they're talking about. Will daisy chaining firewire 400 drives together on a Mac or PC create a performance drop? I'm editing a project using 2 daisy chained drives at the moment with media on both. My co-worker claims it will slow down the computer's access to the media, I say it won't. Neither of us has any hard evidence and a quick google search doesn't turn up anything substantial either. What I'm looking for is hard engineering evidence. Thanks!

The firewire protocol allows for 63 or so devices to be chained together.
Running two FW400 devices should not be an issue. I've run up to a eight on chain in the past.
Still, be aware that some drives do not play well with other drives on the same chain. I have a G-RAID 500GB drive that tanks when there is another drive connected. It runs fine when it is the only drive on the bus.
If you are curious, go to the AJA website and find the "AJA System Test" app. It is a disk drive throughput test. Connect your drives in various configurations and see what happens.
Good luck,
x

Will I notice a significant performance drop if I run my Imac 8,1(early 2008) direct from an external firewire 800 Harddrive

Will I notice a significant performance drop if I run my Imac 8,1(early 2008) direct from an external firewire 800 Harddrive

I notice quite a difference in two of my externals because of that (the 5400 rpm drive was a warranty replacement and I had no idea it wouldn't be 7200 rpm - but that's another subject.....).

GTX 760 OC 2GB Fps drops and performance drops when reach 2GB

Hey after this problems with the GTX970, I decided to test my graphic card which I received from the RMA because the last one just gone, and when reach almost 2GB of ram used the performance drops a lot like in the 970, In games like Assetto Corsa I'm feeling this problem, sometimes I have drops from 60 fps to 20 fps ..
My model is the GTX 760 OC GAMING 2GB but the last which gone had the difference in the memory chip, using hynix memories instead of this new one which have Elpida.
Any idea?

Quote from: Nichrome on 01-February-15, 19:52:28
>>How to contact MSI.<<
I have a feeling that this last bits of vRAM on all cards is having this issue.... later I will test my gtx770 and will see if it also gets lower speeds
Hum ok. After that share with us that bench...

Discrete graphics card performance drop after overheating

Recently I played Amnesia: The Dark Descent on my pc while overclocking slightly using Sapphire TRIXX. I changed GPU clock from 750 to 84x and memory clock from 900 to 10xx. During a cinematic the com crashed, ctrl at del failed to load up but sound was still coming out. I left it like this for2-5 min before force shutdown. When I turned on my laptop again n tried to play games there was a huge performance drop. Games running at 60 fps turned to 20 plus when using dedicated graphics card only ( I disabled dynamic mode n used fixed mode while playing amnesia also, which means I was purely using the dedicated graphics card.)
My laptop is a hp dm4 3005tx Beats edition, with Intel I5 2.5GHz processor and 8.00 gig ram. I also disabled paging file on my laptop btw, regretting this .
can some1 tell me hw to fix.this problem or can I replace my discrete graphics card? Because my laptop has Radeon hd 7470m and Intel hd graphics

The graphics card is soldered on so no replacement. I would do a wipe and reload of the OS and stop overclocking laptop video cards. They are too sensitive to heat and other issues. You are asking for trouble, and may have already found it. At a minimum run DriverCleaner and remove the video driver until you get back to a low-res screen generic vga hardware and then reinstall the best driver you can find.

Sudden MBP Retina 15" gaming performance drop

Hi there,
I've owned my Macbook Pro Retina since a few weeks after it came out last year, and have generally loved using it. However, I'm starting to worry now as I've noticed a severe performance drop lately in games.
I've not booted into Bootcamp (Windows 8 x64) for about two months now, but today I loaded up Skyrim, and the performance was atrocious. The game was unplayable at 1920x1200 on high, unmodded. It lags horribly - 10FPS at most. I used to be able to play this game heavily modded and achieve a high FPS. I've noticed a performance drop with other games as well, much lower than what I'd expect from this machine.
I've checked out GPU-Z and the 650M GT clocks up to 900MHz when the game launches.
I'm not sure what has caused this but I've done some reading and people have suggested an "SMC Reset" - I've tried this to no avail. If anyone could lend any advice I'd greatly appreciate it.

Well one problem is that bootcamp hasn't been updated to support Windows 8 yet, so there may be driver issues there. I have experienced this problems and so have others in this forum and an smc reset has fixed the majority. Are you sure you are performing the SMC reset correctly? Also, try a PRAM reset and see if that helps resolve the issue.

280x x2-x3 performance drops

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for