2LIS_02_SCL extractor is giving 0 records

Hi,
I tried to load data in BI and I am getting 0 records
I checked the extractor in RSA3 and the extractor gave me 0 records but when I checked it in RSA7 in R/3 and I saw lots of records.
what could be the problem
thanks

Hi Vaidya,
Check the Job control in LBWE whether it is maintained or not.
If you don't maintain the job control it won't get data to the DS.
I mean you cannot get deltas and all.
Regards,
Ravi Kanth

Similar Messages

How to track the blocked POs in 2LIS_02_SCL extractor

Hi Gurus,
We have field ROCANCEL in 2LIS_02_SCL extractor which sets to X and R for cancelled and deleted records. On ECC side we either delete the PO (at Item level) or block the PO.
For deleted POs the ROCANCEL flag is setting to R and we are OK with this but how can we track the blocked orders?
The business requirement is to report on blocked orders too.
Thanks,
Anil

Hi,
In Bw thre is always confusion about following Dates.
Posting Date (0PSTNG_DATE)
Schedule Line Delivery Date (0SCL_DELDAT)
Statistics Date (0STAT_DATE)
So ask Functional Consultants and Business USers and Identify the corretc Date in ECC and then Change the Mapping In UPdate Rules in BW. i.e. What date USer is wanting and accordingly we nee dtgo change the mapping in UPdate Rules in Time Char Tab in UpdateRules.
Thanks
Reddy

2LIS_02_SCL extractor is delivering wrong document currency amount

Dear all,
We are currently trying to get the invoiced amount of a purchase order in the document currency (of the invoice). While extracting the Purchasing Orders via the 2LIS_02_SCL we discover that the invoiced amount in document currency (BWGEOO) is wrong (if document currency is not matching local currency). However the invoiced amount in local currency (BWGEO) is correct.
It seems that the BWGEOO is calculated from the local currency field by using the PO header exchange rate (EKKO-WKURS). If we take the exchange rate (RBKP-KURSF) from the invoice header and apply it on the extracted invoiced amount in local currency, we get the correct value.
- Does anyone have some information how the extractor is working (which source table is taken into account)?
- Why is the local currency matching and the document currency not?
- Do you have experienced the same issue? Do you have any solution for this problem?
Thank you.
Regards,
    Michael

Hi,
There are several Notes around this issue, but none of them is solving our problem:
     856004 Invoice value and GR value in extractor 2LIS_02_SCL
     838670 Net value for BWGEO and BWGEOO
     833209 BWGEO and BWGEOO values
The field BWGEOO is delivering a cost based value in document currency out of the PO. This means it is calculating it (quantity * net price). But we needed the actual invoiced amount out of FI.
We found a work-around for this System Design issue. We are going to extract the exchange rate out of the invoice header and apply it to the invoiced amount (REWERT) out of the 2LIS_02_SCL extractor.
Logic to extract it is:
Join the Document Header: Invoice Receipt (RBKP) with the Document Item: Incoming Invoice (RSEG) on Invoice document number (BELNR) and Fiscal Year (GJAHR) key fields. Out of the Item table the purchase order document number (EBELN) and the PO item number (EBELP) can be derived. The exchange rates need to be loaded out of the header (KURSF).
Does anyone of you have additional documentation/information on how the LO extractors (e.g. 2LIS_02_SCL) are working and especially the details of the values (and the definition) out of the extractor?
Thank you.
Regards,
    Michael

How to check at what time the extractor has picked records from r3 tables

Hi experts ,
If we want to know exactly at what time the Extractor has picked up the records from r/3 tables .
or if we want to know the time stamp of extractor picking the records from r3 tables after r3 entries
Regards ,
Subash Balakrishnan

Hi,
The following are few function modules which will give you the information you need based upon the area you are working in.
SD Billing: LOG_CONTENT_BILLING
Delivery: LOG_CONTENT_DELIVERY
Purchasing: LOG_CONTENT_PURCHASING etc...
See if the above FMs help you in any way...

2LIS_02_SCL and 2LIS_02_ITM missing records

Hi,
We have a problem with DS: 2LIS_02_SCL and 2LIS_02_ITM. We load data in 0PUR_C01 throu Bi content standard objects (0PUR_C01 2LIS_02_ITM / ...SCL). ... there seem to be problem with DS because In infocube 0PUR_C01 we don't get consigment records (consigment records - possition on PO). I have already checked DSs in RSA3 and those records are missing?
Any ideas?
JN.

Hi,
are you sure you have PO's for your consignments? I would recommend to check the source tables EKKO, EKPO and EKET first. Once you are sure to have PO's there for consignments you can run RSA3 for the DS with the EBELN (PO Number) and confirm that the extractor does not extract them. One thing to watch out for the RSA3 does not pull from the delta queue but from the setup tables. So you need to make sure that the Consignment Document you are missing are the setup tables.
Hope that helps,
Michael
PS the extractor also pulls BSTYP Document Category K (Contracts) and L (Scheduling agreements)
Edited by: Michael S on Jul 14, 2009 12:20 PM

Starling lines with the 2LIS_02_SCL extractor.

Hi expert.
I have got a problem with the schedule line purchasing extractor, 2LIS_02_SCL.
I noted that the extractor extract many more lines that those present in a purchasing order. In particular, it extracts also deleted items and the corresponding starling items. When I speak of deleted items, I am not referring to those items whose fields LOEKZ is evaluated (these items appears in the order), but I am speaking of lines which does not appear in the order.
Now, I need to filter out these items. I saw that the deleted lines can be recognised through the field ROCANCEL.
The problem is: How can I distinguish the starling lines?
Can someone help me?
Thanks in advance
Andrea

Thanks Jain, but what you are suggesting does not resolve my issue. I try to explain me better.
The estractor estract one line, which is deleted (ROCANCEL = X). THis line has NETW = X and another fields, let us say AA not evaluated. Then I Have a starling line, which will have NETW = -X and AA not evaluated. Then I Have the right item, with NETW = Y and AA opportunely evaluated. Now, only the right line is the one that I have to carry in my DSO. In the PSA I have all the three lines, but unfortunately the last one (the one which goes in the DSO) is not the rigth one (but, almost ever, is the starling line for which the field AA, which is the field I am interested in, is not evaluated).
Very strange, isn't it?
Some ideas?

Filling the 2LIS_02_SCL extractor.

Hi experts,
I am an abap programmer but i am now starting working on a BW project to become a junior BW consultant.
I am now trying to fill the extractor 2LIS_02_SCL. Qhen i go to the RSA3 transaction on the R3 sistem, i see that it is now empty. How can i fill it on the r3 system? it is the first time i'm doing this, excuse me if the quation is too basic.I'll later charge this data to the BW system.
Thank you very much!

Hi
Please have a look at the below url..it gives an idea how to go with LO extraction
LO step by step procedure
Hope it helps
Thanks,
Teja

0FI_AR_4 extractor bringing zero records

Hi,
We are using extractor 0FI_AR_4 as delta. At times it is bringing zero records but the next time it brings data along with the daata missed the previous day.
For ex
Monday it brought records until previous week
Tuesday it brought zero record
Wednesday it brought more records i.e including records created on Monday and Tuesday
We could not figure out a situation when can this happen. But our observation is that there is no entry for tuesday in the table BWOM2_TIMEST.
BWOM_SETTINGS
BWFILOWLIM     19910101
BWFINSAF         3600
BWFISAFETY     1
BWFITIMBOR      020000
DELTIMEST         60
OBJCURTYPE    10
Regards
Vijay

check http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/af/16533bbb15b762e10000000a114084/content.htm
it states :
In delta mode, data requests with InfoSource 0FI_AR_4 and InfoSource 0FI_AP_4 do not provide any data if no new extraction has taken place with InfoSource 0FI_GL_4 since the last data transfer. This ensures that the data in BW for Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable Accounting is exactly as up to date as the data for General Ledger Accounting.
you can check this...de link gives details about the delta methods for FI extractors

CS6 windows extractor keeps giving me errors when trying to create a destination folder.

It gives me three error pop ups. The first says I should check my diskspace and check the destination folders write privileges. I know it is not my diskspace because I have 847 GB free. I tried running it as an administrator and saving it to program files x86, program files, my documents, desktop, C-drive, but none of them are working.
The next error that pops up is telling me to try redownloading it. I have done this and it has not worked.
The last error messege changes based on the destination i am trying to put it in.
I am running windows 8.1 on a brand new HP Envy notebook, it has a x64 bit OS with a Intel I7-4700 MQ processor. I didn't have any problems running it on my old gateway laptop, it was about 7 years old and could run it just fine but it recently died on me. It had a better OS though, Windows 7, and I am wondering if having windows 8.1 is causing a problem with this install.
Anybody have any suggestions?

The trial installer is identical to the installation files which are located at the link discussed in message #3.
Blob5 you may want to try running a trace route for the server which is hosting the CS6 files. The server in question is going to be trials2.adobe.com. This should help you determine if there is any packet loss or servers between you and the download server which may be causing your current difficulties. You can then contact your ISP so they can report the issue.

Deleted records problem w/ 2LIS_02_ITM

hi,
i had always thought that the queued delta method would record changes in sequence of their entry in the system. i discovered that it might not be the case, as in the problem i have below:
i have a PO ODS wherein i don't like to retain entries that have been deleted. my approach was to manage the correction via the recordmode/rocancel fields. however, i just found out that it doesn't hold true for all PO document types - in my scenario, i have a sequence of entries like so:
1- create po
2- flag po item as delivery completed
3- delete po
but, when i load it into BW it comes in as:
1- create po
3- delete po
2- flag as delivery completed
what happens now is that my ODS retains the last entry, since it comes in after the deletion. how do i work around this scenario?
btw, i don't have the deletion indicator in my extractor anymore - took it out as i wanted to rely on the queued delta management for the end result i wanted to achieve.
hoping for some quick responses! =)
ryan.

hi! many thanks for the quick reply...
i didn't tamper with the way the extractor is giving me the records in any way - they are stored there as they are given to me. so for the most part it's standard, except for the fact that i already took fields out of the standard extractor (retained only what i thought i'd need). i also checked the note you mentioned, and unfortunately, we're way beyond that patch level already...
of course the end-all i'm thinking of to solve my problem is to just include the deletion flag, and after everything is loaded and activated, postprocess the ODS to remove all entries that have a non-empty deletion flag.
hoping for more answers from everyone around, before i give up and just serve my head in a platter for my superiors to mangle (what with the requests and all)... :-O
ryan.

GI quantity Delta issue with 2LIS_02_SCL

Hi Friends !
We are facing delta issue in the BI Prod. Hence to look into the issue, performed few steps in Test environment to check whether delta is performing or not. Mentioned below are the steps which are carried :
1. BW Setup
a. Deletion of queues for Purchasing data in ECC
b. Data collection of purchasing documents for March 1 u2013 March 31 in ECC
c. Deletion of source system initialization in BW
d. Loaded collected data into SAP as delta initialization
Result - OK
2. ECC data entry
a. Created PO #5052422, intracompany STO from DDP1 to USC1
i. 1 line item (qty 5) with two schedule lines (qty 2 & 3)
3. First delta run
a. BW brings over 2 schedule lines for PO #5052422
Result - OK
4. ECC data entry
a. Created PO #5052423, intercompany from DDP1 (USC1) to IRP3 (BV11)
i. 1 line item (qty 5) with two schedule lines (qty 2 & 3)
5. Second delta run
a. BW brings over 2 schedule lines for PO #5052423
Result - OK
6. ECC data entry
a. Posted partial delivery for schedule line 1 of PO #5052422 with a quantity of 1
7. Third delta run
a. no records brought over (change to GI quantity should trigger delta)
Result - FAIL
8. ECC data entry
a. Posted partial delivery for remainder of schedule line 1 of PO #5052422 with and a partial delivery for schedule line 2 with a quantity of 1
9. Fourth delta run
a. no records brought over (change to GI quantity should trigger delta)
Result - FAIL
10. ECC data entry
a. Modified delivery date of both schedule lines of PO #5052422
11. Fifth delta run
a. Both schedule lines of PO #5052422 brought over with updated delivery dates and goods issue quantities
Result - OK
12. ECC data entry
a. Modified delivery date of both schedule lines of PO #5052423
13. Fifth delta run
a. Both schedule lines of PO #5052423 brought over with updated delivery dates
Result - OK
Ques :
1) When modified, GI quantity is not triggering delta. Please advise.
2) 2LIS_02_SCL extractor is build on which delta field.
3) How delta works & behaves with 2LIS_02_SCL extractor?
With Regards
Rekha

Good afternoon Rehka,
I believe that it is correct that the GL change you mention will not trigger a delta on the BW side. This functionality appears to be missing.
If you check in LBWE you will see that the EVENTS for 02: Purchasing -> MC02M_0SCL include the following:
MA: Purchase order
MB: Goods receipt
MC: Invoice receipt
MD: Scheduling agreement
The event associated with a Goods Issue is ML and not included in the list of events for this structure. This is the standard behavior.
I checked and I was unable to find a datastructure that does handle event ML. From what I see the only way to do this is through a custom datasource.
Kind Regards,
Des

Generic Extractor: enriching GL Data with Purchasing Data

Experts,
This is my first time with Generic Extractor.
Requirement:
We have a requirement to enrich GL data with Purchasing data via the Material Document Number.
I need to provide this upto to the datawarehouse layer wherein another team will take over.
Solution idea:
Material Document is not part of the datasource 2LIS_02_SCL.
a. Should I enhance this datasource to include material number OR
b. Develop a concept to create a generic delat enabled extractor that pulls data from EKBE, GR and IR information.
In EKBE multiple material documents can exist per PO. The extractor returns 2 record per PO (before and after image) with the updated information.So if we have the first GR with Material document 901 and then a second GR with material doc 902 the extractor loads 3 records. New record, Before image and after image and the only one stored in BI is the after image. material doc would have value 902 if enhanced.
For the generic extractor approach the the ability to load deltas is crucial, since the EKBE table is very big. Maybe
"CPUDT-Day On Which Accounting Document Was Entered" and "CPUTM-Time of Entry" can be leveraged as delta hook.
Any ideas???
Thanks,
Jain

No one answered

Record level lock on SAP ABAP table editing

Hello All,
I have a requirement wherein I need to give users ability to be able to update contents of a table. Currently, there are using maintenance view on the table for adding/editing contents of this table. However, this prevents other users from being able to enter the table and edit contents of other records within the table.
Can anybody please guide me how do I go about giving record level edit lock on the table instead of entire table edit lock.
Appreciate all responses.
Thanks and Regards,
Samta.

Ok
I have had a request like yours, i.e the users could manage the same table in the same time.
The standard behavior avoids it, because a lock of entire table is set.
This was my solution:
A) I've created a maintenance view for my table, and I set the attibute S (for subset) for all fields will be the key I want to lock.
B) I've generated the maintenance table program for the view above.
In this way if it try to manage the view by SM30, it'll be possible only to indicate the values of the fields for the subset, so not all data of the table will be loaded, but only the records satisfying the key.
C) I've created a program to run SM30 for my view, using the fm VIEW_MAINTENANCE_CALL:
.CALL FUNCTION 'VIEW_MAINTENANCE_CALL'
       EXPORTING
            action      = 'S' "Display mode
            view_name   = <table name>
       TABLES
            dba_sellist = tb_sellist
       EXCEPTIONS
            OTHERS      = 14.
As you can see above, the SM30 is always called for DISPLAY only, in this way no standard lock is set
D) I've use the event 19 in order to change the mode and set my lock:
DATA: BEGIN OF MY_LOCK,
          MANDT       TYPE ZPPTA019-MANDT,
          WERKS       TYPE ZPPTA019-WERKS,
          /TRILOG/SE TYPE ZPPTA019-/TRILOG/SE,
          COD_MOD_TAG TYPE ZPPTA019-COD_MOD_TAG,
        END OF MY_LOCK.
DATA: W_SEL_LIST TYPE VIMSELLIST.
DATA: VARKEY TYPE RSTABLE-VARKEY.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <MY_KEY> TYPE ANY.
LOOP AT DBA_SELLIST INTO W_SEL_LIST
    WHERE VIEWFIELD = 'WERKS'
      OR VIEWFIELD = '/TRILOG/SE'
      OR VIEWFIELD = 'COD_MOD_TAG'.
    ASSIGN COMPONENT W_SEL_LIST-VIEWFIELD
       OF STRUCTURE MY_LOCK TO <MY_KEY>.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
      MOVE W_SEL_LIST-VALUE TO <MY_KEY>.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    IF NOT MY_LOCK IS INITIAL.
      MY_LOCK-MANDT = SY-MANDT.
      VARKEY = MY_LOCK.
      CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_E_TABLEE'
        EXPORTING
          MODE_RSTABLE   = 'E'
          TABNAME        = 'ZPPTA019'
          VARKEY         = VARKEY
        EXCEPTIONS
          FOREIGN_LOCK   = 1
          SYSTEM_FAILURE = 2
          OTHERS         = 3.
      IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
        MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE 'S' NUMBER SY-MSGNO
                WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
      ELSE.
        MAINT_MODE = VIEW_ACTION = 'U'.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
CLEAR OLD_019.
I hope it can help you
Max

2LIS_02_SCL - Purchase Order History

Hi All,
Im working with 2lis_02_scl extractor,and when i executed a report i noticed that in the "Invoice receipt quantity (0INV_REC_QTY)" the extractor takes all the amounts that exists in the "Purchase Order History" Tabsheet in Tx(ME23N), so my question is:
Is there a way to take just the amounts for "Goods Receipts" and "Invoice Receipt" without making an append in the lis structure with the "Short Text" Field?
Thanks a lot

Diego,
Thank a lot !! I've solved the issue !! i really appreciatte your help !!
Regards

Enhancing 2LIS_02_SCL

Hi SDN,
I have enhanced 2LIS_02_SCL with EKKO-AEDAT field.
Steps I have done:
1. Since EKKO is a base table for 2LIS_02_SCL extractor, I have added AEDAT as is directly(with out ZZ append to the field) to the MC02M_1SCL communication structure as a append.
2. Activated the extract stucture (with warnings as expected)
Table is not yet classified
Field AEDAT does not lie within customer namespace
Table ZZMC02M_1SCL is used by table MC02M_1SCL as an append structure
List of tables dependent on ZZMC02M_1SCL
Table MC02M_1SCL
Table MC02M_0SCL
Table ZZMC02M_1SCL was checked with warnings
3.Able to see AEDAT field by generating the datasource in RSA6 and also unchecked HIDE mark.
4. Deleted the setuptable and intialised the setuptables after the enhancement is complete
5 Able to see the historical data in RSA3.
ISSUE:
Data is not populating for AEDAT field even though data exist in EKKO table for the PO I am able to extract in RSA3.
Please suggest what could go wrong in this scenario.

Hi,
Have you solved this issue?
Could u pls tell me how?

2LIS_02_SCL extractor is giving 0 records

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for