2LIS_02_SCL field appended code missing

Hello experts,
There is a datasource 2lis_02_scl.
Now in its extract structure a field is appended named YYAMFEXWD.
Also it is not there in any standard table on which the extract structure is created.
It is of type dats length 8.
Its component type is blank.
ALso it is marked as field only.
But no code is written for that field in R/3 exits and though when i extract data i am getting values in that field.
Can anyone tell me from where are the values coming?
I will assign full points.

Hi Mansi,
Datasource 2lis_02_scl picks up data from table EKET, EKKO, EKPO. This is a purchasing data related to schedule lines in purchase orders. Now, the question remains how data coming to field YYAMFEXWD, this filed would have been populated via datasource enhancement in CMOD. check/find for a code giving datasource name and subsequently there will be code for this field.
So on checking code if u did not found any relevant code in datasource enhancement(CMOD) for populating this field. Then cenrtainly this field is not of any use.
If your client has any practise of mainting dataflow documentation, then u may find relevant details in that document. Other wise just skip this field.
Assign the points if it helps you.

Similar Messages

PO : Invoice value in ME23N is not matching with 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO

Hi Expert,
              1) Invoice value in ME23N tcode is not matching with datasource 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO in item level
for few item BWGEO field contain the data with tax but for few item the value is not coming correctly.
2) The value is not matching for that particular item which has same material document in other Item level.
eg. PO(eg 60000XXXXX) if item 1 has invoice value with tax is 1300+52 and its material doc is XXXX1234. if same material doc XXXX1234 is present in
item 2 for another invoice of same material invoice value with tax is 1200+48. In that case the value which is coming in
BWGEO field is 1300 only.
I am working in 7.0 system for AFS specific. My whole transaction is in INR.
Thanks and Regards
Lalit Kumar

Please review the information below from one of our deverlopers
- it may explain the behaviour you are seeing on your system:
When posting a GOODS RECEIPT for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will
have the information regarding the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG
and XMCEKET-WEWRT) and not the invoice values (XMCEKET-REMNG and
XMCEKET-REWRT).
When posting an INVOICE for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will
have the information regarding the INVOICE values (XMCEKET-REMNG
and XMCEKET-REWRT) and not the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG and
XMCEKET-WEWRT).
The DELTA INIT process is different, because for this process, all
information about posted documents against a purchasing order need to
processed again and this means that all documents related to an order
(invoices, goods receipt, deliver costs, goods issue, etc)
are read from database and rebuild one by one in the same process, and
of course this information in available.
When posting an invoice, the goods receipt information is not
available because of the following reasons:
1 - System standard fields.
In datasource 2LIS_02_SCL, there is only
fields BWMNG - that represents quantity, BWGEO and BWGEO that
represent values. The information under these fields are dependent
from the information of field BWVORG (BW transaction key). This field
determines whether these values are from a purchasing order, goods
receipt or an invoice. You never have a missing information, but when
you want to get goods receipt values, you need to check where the
BWVORG correspond to goods receipt process and not invoice.
2 - Performance
There are documents as purchasing orders and schedule agreements that
are opened for years in some customer system (it may not be your case),
where goods receipt and invoices have been posted during all this time.
Every time that a new document is posted in order to built the
cancellation sentence (ROCANCEL = X) and in order to add the new
value in the old, system need to process all previous posted documents,
and this means processing time. For this reason when posting invoices
only previous documents that are invoices are taken into account and
not goods receipt.
The delta fields, DBWMNG and DBWGEO, are the difference between the
purchasing order quantity and values and the goods receipt quantity
and values, then is natural that this information is only available
when processing a goods receipt and not when processing an invoice.
I'm sorry if this is not the system behavior that you are expecting,
but this is the normal standard behavior and this is really necessary
because of the system performance when dealing with documents that
have a long order history.
Hope this information is useful for you
Best Regards
Barry

We are Not able to Add, approved A/P invoice - Error - Tax code Missing

Dear Experts,
In A/P -> A/P service Invoice
When We are going to Add Approved Invoice ,system can not allow . This
invoice is go through a approval process ,system can not allow to change any
of document row during approval process or after approval process.
we are unable to add tax or remove line item after approval.
We are Not able to Add, approved A/P invoice - Error - Tax code Missing
[A/p Invoice Row -Tax code] Line 3 [Message 3513-14]
I think ,It should allow the system to edit the row tax or amount after or during
approval process

Don't worry,AP invoice is not get posted,it will be saved as draft only,
Default tax code for purchase documents using tax code determination.
Create new ap invoice with tax code and send it for approval.
Orginator should ensure all mandatory fields in document are entered correctly before
sending it for approval.

Required field, UPC, is missing. Please add UPC to the listing and retry the operation.

What to do about this: "Required field, UPC, is missing. Please add UPC to the listing and retry the operation." ? We sell cassette tapes and sometimes they are are of a vintage that predates upc codes.

forester_studios wrote:OK thanks for the input; but selecting 1 item leaves the other 4 or 5 unsearchable I would think. Seems like a typical ebay answer (which is not much better than no answer as far as problem solving goes). I have to wonder if ebay thought this new requirement through. Often upc codes on Canadian items are not in ebays system at all. So are these items which have upc codes un-listable since ebay does not acknowledge they exsist? In that case, here is what I intend to do.... List the most important item's UPC in the actual required UPC field and then create as many other 'custom' item specific UPC fields as are allowed. You need to be on the long form selling form to do it. Call them Other UPC and Even More UPC or something. And then, just to be sure, I'll list all the UPCs in the item description. Buyers probably won't search for UPC (unless they're standing in a retail store with their smartphone in hand and looking for cheaper pricing online) but search engines do. When I look for the products that I sell on google, I get amazon results 19 times before I see one from eBay. I'm certain that's the UPC talking there. We do need Product Identifiers on eBay. Implementing them is the difficulty. Ebay is aware that the UPC for Canadian packages may be different than the exact same in an American one. I've raised it and was told they were looking into it. Use the MPN identifiers too. Pretty much nothing I list can be found in the product catalogue on ebay.ca (is there one?) so I don't know what to expect for resolution there if and when the Catalogue version of the Product Identifiers are shown to be clearly wrong but I know it happens, here and elsewhere. The last order that I placed with Amazon had a new UPC pasted over an old, similar product. It was not what I ordered. Close but no cigar. Hopefully, when all of this becomes 'official' in two weeks, there will be a timely manner to address item misinformation within the Product Catalogue. In the meantime, I would state all the item properties in the Item Description area to cover my butt.

Service po created with reference to preq , in po some fields data was miss

i was created preq with item type D and account assignment category = network , uploading point data and recipient data.
after that i was created po with reference to that preq , in that po uploading field , recipient field data was missing , how to get that data in service po

Hi,
In service documents and blanket PO's the "goods recipient" can not
be used. Please read the information from the note 118008:
The system does not display the goods recipient and unloading point
fields in the account assignment block for a service line even though
they are set as input fields in Customizing.
You cannot display fields 'Unloading Point' and/or 'Goods Recipient' in
the R/3 system. The reason for this is that every account assignment
object for each service specification can have several unloading points
and/or goods recipients.
In particular, only one cumulation for each account assignment object is
possible and useful at purchase order item level.
As of Release 4.0, user fields are available in external services
management.
You can name these user fields, for example, 'Unloading Point' and
'Goods Recipient'.
A user field belongs to the service line and is purely informative.
Regards,
Edit

Some fields value goes missing while hitting backspace

While hitting backspace on a page the previous page that opens does not hold all the data that was filled in. Some of the field values goes missing. I think it is a browser cache problem. The browser should always rememeber the field values while reloading a page. In some of the cases it does not(specially when backspace is being pressed). Is there any suggestion? Please help me out.

Hey.. I have encountered the same problem too. Actually if I have some text field elements and if we implement some kind of Javascript or Jquery validation on it and then after moving to next page when we press backspace we do not get previous input values in the previous page. Not only that some times if we do not implement any validation still the values lost while coming back to the previous page by pressing backspace or browser back button. Any suggestion please..

Java.lang.RuntimeException: Uncompilable source code - missing method body

Hi,
I am getting the following error at runtime
java.lang.RuntimeException: Uncompilable source code - missing method body, or declare abstractwhen I try to instantiate a class using reflexion as following:
MyInstance = MyClass.newInstance(); I have tried to find some explanation using Google, but could not find any that fit my case. MyClass's implementation has a public constructor with no parameter. There is no error at compile time when cleaning and building all code.
Anyone has tips about what could cause this error?
Thanks.

Jrm wrote:
It is not my code originally... You are making far too many unchecked assumptions about the reality of this situation to even get close to what that reality it is... Get over patronizing, it would improve your social/people skills... Thanks !It is your own problem that you perceive something as patronizing, while in fact it was only an honest and straight to the point attempt to help you. This forum does not deal in sensitivity, it gets in the way of helping people to see the error of their ways.

Performing filter for field Tax Code (MWSKZ) in the Purchase Order

Hello Experts,
We have to perform a filter for field Tax Code in the purchase order (ME21N / ME22N / ME23N). We've tried to use SH SH_T007A and SSH_T007A with search help exit (e.g. F4_TAXCODE_USER_EXIT) but it is not working. The ABAP programmer has performed a debug and the standard does not check any line code in this function (the ABAP programmer has set a breakpoint into function F4_TAXCODE_USER_EXIT after assigning it for mentioned search helps)... it sounds like this program / search help is not called by standard program of ME2* transactions...
I've tried to look for some other object and other function called FI_F4_MWSKZ has been found... I've set a breakpoint there and when I open the search help for field tax code into transaction ME21N it works... but as I could see this function FI_F4_MWSKZ is a standard one which we can not change...
Have you ever had the same problem?
We are currently in the SAP 4.6C version. I've found lots of OSS notes but only valid for 6.0.
Maybe someone can help me on that.
Best regards,
Nilmar

hi,
goto gs01 transaction,give some name to ur step.
give the table name and field name.
then u can create a specific value set for that field.
save.
now u can use this set to define conditions for ur fields in obbh transaction.

Problem: Not able to change Signature field reason code Dynamically using signatureSetSeedValue

Problem: Not able to change Signature Settings Dynamically.
What I want: Need to change the Signature Field Reason code Dynamically upon selecting Radio Button.
Here is My Code:
var mydoc = xfa.resolveNode("FormData.P3_443.signature[2].ePadSignatureField3");
mydoc.signatureSetSeedValue(
reasons: ["Advisor"],
flags: 8
Error Message:
TypeError: mydoc.signatureSetSeedValue is not a function
9:XFA:FormData[0]:P3_443[0]:signature[2]:ePadSignatureField3[0]:validate'
   Source Code: Acrobat Code for Signature.
   // Obtain the signature field object:
var f = this.getField("mySigFieldName");
f.signatureSetSeedValue(
{ reasons: ["This is a reason", "This is a better reason"],
flags: 8

Problem: Not able to change Signature Settings Dynamically.
What I want: Need to change the Signature Field Reason code Dynamically upon selecting Radio Button.
Here is My Code:
var mydoc = xfa.resolveNode("FormData.P3_443.signature[2].ePadSignatureField3");
mydoc.signatureSetSeedValue(
reasons: ["Advisor"],
flags: 8
Error Message:
TypeError: mydoc.signatureSetSeedValue is not a function
9:XFA:FormData[0]:P3_443[0]:signature[2]:ePadSignatureField3[0]:validate'
   Source Code: Acrobat Code for Signature.
   // Obtain the signature field object:
var f = this.getField("mySigFieldName");
f.signatureSetSeedValue(
{ reasons: ["This is a reason", "This is a better reason"],
flags: 8

Inbound IDoc: Field BVTYP is missing

Hi,
I am new to IDoc I need help with a scenario. We have an interface wherein AP documents are transported to SAP. When we are viewing these IDocs in SAP field BVTYP (Partner Bank Type) is missing
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Are you dealing with inbound or outbound IDoc for sales order?
I am a bit confused ... you mentioned the IDoc successfully posted (inbound IDoc?) however outsource EDI team reported that field ZEILE is missing (outbound IDoc?)
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Additional field post code 2 in search in webui

Hi,
I am new to crm webui.I need to add the additional field post code to search this field is not available in the context node but is a standard feature.Please tell me step by step.
P.S points will be awarded.

The good news is that the field is in the underlying search function module used by Business Partner Search.
All you need to do is the following:
Add the field
POST_CODE2 data element AD_PSTCD2 to the structure CRMST_HEADER_SEARCH_BUIL.
This should magically make the element available for search and you will only need to configure your screen to have the element bound beyond the context node config.
I believe this should work, based on looking at the code used for the BP search.
Good luck,
Stephen

While doing vl03n i get error balancing field profit center missing

while doing vl03n i get error balancing field profit center missing in line item 001

Hi,
Please check whether the Inheritance option is selection while activating the document splitting.
SPRO> Financial Accounting (New) > GL Accounting (New) > Business Transaction > DOcument Splitting > Activate Document Splitting
Regards,
SDNer

Inactive field Company code in production

Hello all,
in the production system and in transaction PPOME I can change the value in field Company code (folder Account assignment) for the parent org. unit. If I select an org. unit which hangs from the parent, then the field is inactive and I cannot change the value. This is the same story for any other org. unit in deeper levels. This does not happen in development and test system.
I guess that this is a customizing topic but where exactly can I make the field Active ??
Thanks.

Please check the following switches in table T77S0
PPOM INHIC
PPOM INHIH
PPOM INHS
Regards
Ravikumar

Java script code missing' comes up in a window when I try to batch process my images in photoshop.

I have an imac version 10.9.4, Photoshop cs5.1. I'll select file-script-image processor and that is when the 'java script code missing' pops up. It used to work before I upgraded to the version 10.9.4. I called Apple and they don't know what to do. Now I'm here on the community site hoping someone can help. Not being computer savvy I don't understand anything I try to read about it.

I finally found out that my 'McAfee SiteAdvisor' add-on was causing the problem for me. You can either disable it from your add-ons by clicking on tools, then add-ons and then disable it from your list of add-ons, or if you still wish to use it like I do, you can unistall it from your add-on list, and then download it from the official McAfee web site and then simply reinstall it... Since I've done this my firefox been loading faster, no annoying pop-up window when I launch or open a new tab. It was also crashing quiet often before I did this and that seemed to be fixed now.
here is the link for the McAfee SiteAdvisor download from the official McAfee web site if anyone needs to download it again like I had to.
http://us.mcafee.com/root/product.asp?productid=sa

Thiefs! Field Value is missing.

Hello,
I have a RFC -> XI -> Email Szenario and built a function modul in SAP
to test the RFC. But SXMB_MONI don't receive all field values or the values
are in wrong fields. First I thought my mapping is crashed, but the it seems
the RFC delivers wrong information. In Moni the payload looks like this

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:Z_RFC_CALL_XI xmlns:ns0="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">
- <GS_REASON>
<REASON1>Reason1</REASON1>
<REASON2>Reason3</REASON2>
<REASON3 />
<REASON4 />
</GS_REASON>
..
In RFC I filled it like this:

<REASON1>Reason1</REASON1>
<REASON2>Reason2</REASON2>
<REASON3>Reason2</REASON3>
<REASON4>Reason2</REASON4>

So what happend? The result screen of my RFC tells me that all
fields were filled and send successfully.
How can I debug this?
thanks
chris

No, but I can only see the payload after my first mapping and not the stuff direct send from SAP. But it is only a 1:1-mapping to an abstract interface.
The payload there is crashed. Interessting is that my RFC function moduls
uses structures and tables which are send to XI, but only the structures
with the field MANDT are wrong.
Example:

GS_SC_DATA>
<MANDT>001</MANDT>
<ISOSID>0715-2006-0000000173 GO</ISOSID>
<ACTION />
<TYPE />
<SID>OTN20DT113083 USRI32365 0</SID>
<DEVNAME>TEXTTEXTEXT</DEVNAME>
<USERID />

The ISOSID should look like <ISOSID>LI20715-2006-0000000173</ISOSID> so the first three character of the field MANDT are missing in next field and so on.
Tables (even with MANDT field) are transfered correct like this dummy values:
- <GT_SERVICE>
- <item>
<MANDT>444</MANDT>
<ISOSID>444</ISOSID>
<ITEM_COUNT>444</ITEM_COUNT>
<SERVICECODE>444</SERVICECODE>
<SERV_CLUSTER>444</SERV_CLUSTER>
<SERVICE>444</SERVICE>
<SERVICEOPTION>444</SERVICEOPTION>
<SERVICEOWNER>444</SERVICEOWNER>
<COUNTRY>444</COUNTRY>
<BU>444</BU>
<PRICE>444</PRICE>
<PRICEUNIT>444</PRICEUNIT>
<LOCATION>444</LOCATION>
</item>
</GT_SERVICE>
It really looks like a bug

2LIS_02_SCL field appended code missing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for