2LIS_03_BF standard extractor does not extract records

Hi,
I enabled the standard extractor 2LIS_03_BF (mov.mercancias), I am probrando data extraction through rso2 transaction, and does not draw anything (0registros) and tables sources (msec and mkpf) if data exists I have to make some configuration prior to extractor, to extract data?
This is active in the transaction LBWE.
Greetings,

See response in duplicate thread: [2LIS_03_BF standard extractor extracts data not;

Similar Messages

0CRM_OPPT_H always does not extract field BWSTONESYS4

Hi,
The extractor 0CRM_OPPT_H always does not extract field BWSTONESYS4 BW status. However by transaction CRMD_BUS2000111 I visualize the status E0003 Won.
Can you help me?
Versions:
CRM 5.0
BW 7.0
PS: Sorry about my English. I speak Italian and French

Hi All,
I am facing the same problem..
standard 0CRM_OPPT_H dose not contain the 'STATUS' field, e.g. E0001
I found that maybe we can find that field by join the following three tables and the oppt guid.
                CRM_JEST
     CRM_JSTO
     TJ30T
but it is too suffering....
anyone can help?

Standard Extractors or Generic Extraction

Hi BW guru's,
Because in our environment standard extractors are not working at all. so can i go for generic extraction , by creating view on r/3 tables according to the requirement.
is there any disadvantage in using generic extraction over the "Using Standard Datasources".We are developing reports for PM module.
Srinivas--

Srinivas
No, There are no disadvantages and as you know this is general Practice only. If standard extractors are not suitable obiously we have to go for Generic Extraction method. Another suggestion please see if you could able to use standard extractors with doing enhancements rather than going completly for Generic extraction.
Hope this helps
Thnaks
Sat

Full extractor does not load all the g/l accounts

Hello experts,
I have a empy DataStore Object (ZFI_O02) and I want to load the information (g/l accounts) with a full infopackage. The load have the status of "Green" but when I check the information I have accounts without some documents. I do not know why my full extractor does not load correctly all the information.
I test the DataSources (3FI_SL_K2_SI) with the Tcode RSA3 and the test shows the all the accounts with all the documents.
Others tests -> I used the same infopackage (full mode) and restrict with the 0FISCPER (2010) and 0GL_ACCOUNT (Account Number) checked the PSA and I have the acoount with all the documents.
-> I used the same infopackage (full mode) and restrict only with the 0FISCPER (2010) checked the PSA and I have the account with one document missed.
Please help me.
Regards
Jeanette

Hi Jeanette,
Looks like the data is getting overwritten in the DSO. This usually happens when there are records with same Key Fields and also has certain characteristics that are unique but not key fields.
I suggest, you take a subset of a GL for which the data does not match, then compare the entries in the DSO and the PSA.
For Eg: If Business Area is not the key, then the data for all the same business areas will be overwritten. Thus making the BA key would eliminate the problem.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Gaurav

Master Data load does not extract Hierarchy nodes in BPC Dimension ACCOUNT

Hi Experts,
I am performing master data load through standard DM package with Filter selection as:
1. Chart of Accounts
2. Hieararchy selection has 4 hierarchy names
3. Selected Import Text nodes
4. Selected Set Filters by Attribute OR Hierarchies
I have run this DM package for a set of data and selections a week ago and it worked fine.
However when i run it now, it is giving issues,
It extracts any new GL maintained in the BI system however it does not extract any hierarchy nodes at all! (Have tested this by deleting the hierarchy nodes and tried to run the master data load)
I am running the DM package in Update and have selection as External.
Any sugestions for checks / has anyone encountered this issue earlier?
Regards,
Shweta Salpe

Hi Guyz,
Thanks.
I found that the issue was with the transformation file where i was maintaining the RATETYPE.
When i removed the mapping of RATETYPE this works fine. (Pulls the nodes of hierarchies)
however now i do not have Ratetype populated in the system.
my rate type mapping is:
RATETYPE=*IF(ID(1:1)=*STR(C) then *STR(TOSKIP);ID(1:1)=*STR(H) then *STR(TOSKIP);ID)
and in conversion file i have TOSKIP *skip
I have to skip the ratetypes for the hierarchy nodes and my hierarchy nodes start with C and H.
So now that i have removed the mapping for RATETYPE can anyone suggest me a correct way to achieve this? (Note the above mapping formula was skipping all of the hierarchy nodes starting with C and H)
Regards,
Shweta Salpe

How to notify in case SQL query(JDBC sender adapter) does not fetch records

hi,
How can we notify(by alerts or something) in case SQL query(JDBC sender adapter) does not fetch records? In channels logs it only says processing started & finished(no message is created for same).
Thanks,
Mayank

Hi,
1 ) What is exact audit log message ?
2) Try fetching the count in SQL statement if there are any valid records it will give the count.
May for testing you can use <TEST> in update statement.
3) Have you used taskTimeout parameter ?
4) Are multiple channels polling on same table ?
regards
Ganga

Web Start does not extract native library

Hi there,
we�ve been deploying our application through web start for about a year, yet. And we are in the "lucky" situation, that all customers are running windows and indentical JREs.
A few weeks ago we switched from 1.4.2_08 to 1.5.0_03. Our customers (pre-)install our application by using the -import option of web start, which downloads fine. But recently, we receive more and more error reports, that a call to a native library fails, when the application is first run.
Thus we inspected the users' web start cache and found out, that though the jar containing our native lib was downloaded into the cache, but the contained dll is not extracted.
The extracted dll usually resides in a directory RM*.jar in the cache. And of course, as it isn't there, the call to the library fails.
But the question is, why web start does not extract the dll in some cases? Unfortunately we were not able to reproduce this situation locally, so we're limited to our customers' reports.
Btw. the dll is in the jar's root directory and the jar itself (as well as all other application jars) is signed.
Any suggestions?
Clearing the cache and donwloading again solves the problem, but might not be suitable for users that repeatedly need to download 10 megs with an isdn dial-up connection... :-/
Thanks in advance!
tdecem

To try to reproduce the original problem, remove the deployment.properties file from the <application data>\Sun\Java|Deployment directory, then run 1.4.2 with you app. The upgrade to 1.5.0.
The cache will only be upgraded if deployment.properties file indicates that it has never been run with 1.5.0, so if you have had 1.5.0 insalled on a system, and then you remove it, the cache may never be upgraded unles the deployment.property file is removed and then used with 1.4.2.

2LIS_03_BF standard extractor extracts data not

Hi,
I enabled the standard extractor 2LIS_03_BF (movement of goods), I am testing the data extraction through RSO2 transaction, and does not draw anything (0 records) and tables sources (mseg and mkpf) if data exists I perform some configuration prior to extractor, to extract data?
This is active in the transaction LBWE.
Greetings,

Hi,
Please check whether the following settings were maintained under
SBIW - Settings for Application-Specific Data Sources (PI) - Settings:
Inventory Controlling - Determine Industry Sector and Stock
initialization.
Maintain the Industry sector as "Standard" and Initialize the stocks
under stock initialization 2LIS_03_BX.
Also maintain the Application Indicator for BTE under transaction "BF11"
view: TBE11 in R/3.
Fill the setup tables for material movements 2LIS_03_BF and
revaluations 2LIS_03_UM
Set up tables for Inventory can be seen under SE11.
1. MC03BX0SETUP
2. MC03BF0SETUP
3. MC03UM0SETUP
Make sure after carrying out the above activities these tables should
display records.
Then start the extraction using 2LIS_03_BF, and 2LIS_03_UM data sources.
Santosh
Edited by: Santhosh Nagaraj on Nov 2, 2009 10:20 PM

Datasource 0WS_TAROBJ_ATTR does not extract any record

I am using the datasource 0WS_TAROBJ_ATTR to get data from CRM to infoobject 0WS_TAROBJ. However, this extractor is not loading any record.
According SAP information and some forum discussion, I have found that the datasource WS_TAROBJ_ATTR loads data from the table CRM_SVY_RE_TAOBJ.
There is no data into this table, even in production environment.
I have found the SAP Note 785261 (CRM survey: Missing entries in table CRM_SVY_RE_TAOBJ) that describes a similar situation. I have applied it and after that I have provide a full repair from 0SVY_DATA_1 in order to fill out this table. However it did not work properly and the table still empty.
Could you please, someone helps me on this issue?
Thanks in advance,
Silvio Messias

No comments!

Function Module not extracting records when InfoPackaged is executed

Hi,
I'm using a Function module for extracting data. The DataSource is working fine in RSA3 with a selection criteria. But when i schedule the infopackage with the same selections in the data selection tab, Its not getting me any records into BW. In the Details Tab i get the message "Error occurred in the data selection" . I guess there is a problem with the data selection. Pasted below is the code i'm using for extraction. Can anyone please let me know if there is any issue with the code.
Also how do we pass on the value of I_MAXSIZE into the function module, the remaining parameters get the values from BW. And can anyone please explain me the concept of the "s_counter_datapakid" and when it should be incremented and where it should be located in the code?
Thanks,
AM
Auxiliary Selection criteria structure
DATA: l_s_select TYPE srsc_s_select.
Maximum number of lines for DB table
STATICS: s_s_if TYPE srsc_s_if_simple,
counter
          s_counter_datapakid LIKE sy-tabix,
cursor
          s_cursor TYPE cursor.
Initialization mode (first call by SAPI) or data transfer mode
(following calls) ?
IF i_initflag = sbiwa_c_flag_on.
Initialization: check input parameters
                buffer input parameters
                prepare data selection
Check DataSource validity
    CASE i_dsource.
      WHEN 'XXXXX'.
      WHEN OTHERS.
this is a typical log call. Please write every error message like this
        log_write 'E'                  "message type
                  'R3'                 "message class
                  '009'                "message number
                  i_dsource   "message variable 1
                  ' '.                 "message variable 2
        RAISE error_passed_to_mess_handler.
    ENDCASE.
    APPEND LINES OF i_t_select TO s_s_if-t_select.
Fill parameter buffer for data extraction calls
    s_s_if-requnr    = i_requnr.
    s_s_if-dsource = i_dsource.
    s_s_if-maxsize   = i_maxsize.
Fill field list table for an optimized select statement
(in case that there is no 1:1 relation between InfoSource fields
and database table fields this may be far from beeing trivial)
    APPEND LINES OF i_t_fields TO s_s_if-t_fields.
ELSE.
Data transfer: First Call      OPEN CURSOR + FETCH
               Following Calls FETCH only
First data package -> OPEN CURSOR
    IF s_counter_datapakid = 0.
      g_first = 'X'.
Fill range tables BW will only pass down simple selection criteria
of the type SIGN = 'I' and OPTION = 'EQ' or OPTION = 'BT'.
      LOOP AT s_s_if-t_select INTO l_s_select WHERE fieldnm = 'BWLVS'.
        IF l_s_select-low <> '101' AND
           l_s_select-low <> '109'.
          RAISE invalid_movement_type.
        ELSE.
          MOVE-CORRESPONDING l_s_select TO r_im_bwlvs.
          APPEND r_im_bwlvs.
        ENDIF.
      ENDLOOP.
      LOOP AT s_s_if-t_select INTO l_s_select WHERE fieldnm = 'BEGDA'.
        MOVE-CORRESPONDING l_s_select TO r_im_begda.
        r_im_begda-low0(4) = l_s_select-low6(4).
        r_im_begda-low4(2) = l_s_select-low0(2).
        r_im_begda-low6(2) = l_s_select-low3(2).
        APPEND r_im_begda.
      ENDLOOP.
      LOOP AT s_s_if-t_select INTO l_s_select WHERE fieldnm = 'ENDDA'.
        MOVE-CORRESPONDING l_s_select TO r_im_endda.
        r_im_endda-low0(4) = l_s_select-low6(4).
        r_im_endda-low4(2) = l_s_select-low0(2).
        r_im_endda-low6(2) = l_s_select-low3(2).
        APPEND r_im_endda.
      ENDLOOP.
*Select from table ltak into internal table i_ltak the following fields.
*Condition: where bwlvs = import bwlvs & endat is >= import begda and
<= import endda.
      READ TABLE r_im_begda INDEX 1.
      IF sy-subrc NE 0.
        RAISE blank_date_invalid.
      ELSE.
        IF r_im_begda-low IS INITIAL.
          RAISE blank_date_invalid.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
      READ TABLE r_im_endda INDEX 1.
      IF sy-subrc NE 0.
        RAISE blank_date_invalid.
      ELSE.
        IF r_im_endda-low IS INITIAL.
          RAISE blank_date_invalid.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
      IF NOT r_im_endda-low IS INITIAL
        AND r_im_begda-low > r_im_endda-low.
        RAISE invalid_date.
      ENDIF.
      r_endat-sign = 'I'.
      r_endat-option = 'BT'.
      r_endat-low = r_im_begda-low.
      r_endat-high = r_im_endda-low.
      APPEND r_endat.
*-- Get data from the tables
      PERFORM get_data.
*-- Populate the extract structure with data
      PERFORM write_data.
*-- Fill Export able with the extracted data
      e_t_data[] = i_zbipicprd2[].
    ENDIF.                             "First data package ?
    IF g_first EQ 'X'.
      CLEAR g_first.
    ELSE.
*-- This is important to prevent endless loop.
      RAISE no_more_data.
    ENDIF.
s_counter_datapakid = s_counter_datapakid + 1.
ENDIF.              "Initialization mode or data extraction ?
ENDFUNCTION.

The load is running successfully but its not fetching any records into BW.
In the Status tab, Step by Step Analysis the following three steps are red:
Does selectable data exist in the source system? (Red)
Data selection successfully started ? (Red)
Data selection successfully finished ? (Red)
and the below is the Analysis
Diagnosis
    The data request was a full update.
    o   In this case, the corresponding table in the source system does not
            contain any data.
    o   System Response
            Info IDoc received with status 8.
            Procedure
Check the data basis in the source system.
But i have data in R/3 and i'm able to extract it using RSA3

Sales order does not extract plant information from material master data

Hi experts,
I have created a sales order. However, the plant in the shipping tab can only be manually entered.
I have made the check:
the customer material master data does not have the plant info.
the customer master data does not have it either.
It is defined in the material master data: sales:general/plant
But the sales order did not extract this information. Why does this happen?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Fan

Hello Friend,
As right stated by you,
The Plant will be copied from the master data to the sales order, if not it should be manually entered
The Sequence System will search for the Plant is as follow..
1. Customer material infor record, If it was not maintained then it will search in
2. Customer master, if the entre was not maintained in the SHIPPING TAB
3. Finally it will search in the Material master in the Sales organisation data 1 in the field DELVERING PLANT field.
So please search whether the entry was maintained in that field at the sales:sales organisation data 1.
This might be the issue.
Please revert if you want further details
regards,
santosh

Makepkg does not extract anything before trying to make [SOLVED]

I have a puzzeling problem with my makepkg. When trying to install any package from the aur (with or without yaourt) I get an error similar to this:
[chris@cow ~]$ wget http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera/opera.tar.gz
--2009-09-14 16:55:28-- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera/opera.tar.gz
Resolving aur.archlinux.org... 208.92.232.29
Connecting to aur.archlinux.org|208.92.232.29|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 2724 (2.7K) [application/x-tgz]
Saving to: `opera.tar.gz'
100%[=====================================================================================================================================================================================================>] 2,724 --.-K/s in 0.001s
2009-09-14 16:55:28 (2.87 MB/s) - `opera.tar.gz' saved [2724/2724]
[chris@cow ~]$ tar -xzvf opera.tar.gz
opera
opera/opera.desktop
opera/PKGBUILD
opera/opera-qt4-theme.patch
tar: Record size = 18 blocks
[chris@cow ~]$ cd opera
opera/ opera.tar.gz
[chris@cow ~]$ cd opera
[chris@cow opera]$ makepkg
==> Making package: opera 10.00-3 x86_64 (Mon Sep 14 16:56:23 PDT 2009)
==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies...
==> Retrieving Sources...
-> Downloading opera-10.00.gcc4-qt4.x86_64.tar.bz2...
--2009-09-14 16:56:24-- http://ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/linux/10 … 64.tar.bz2
Resolving ftp.opera.com... 195.189.143.122
Connecting to ftp.opera.com|195.189.143.122|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 9262414 (8.8M) [application/x-tar]
Saving to: `opera-10.00.gcc4-qt4.x86_64.tar.bz2.part'
100%[=====================================================================================================================================================================================================>] 9,262,414 79.7K/s in 23s
2009-09-14 16:56:47 (399 KB/s) - `opera-10.00.gcc4-qt4.x86_64.tar.bz2.part' saved [9262414/9262414]
-> Found opera.desktop in build dir
-> Found opera-qt4-theme.patch in build dir
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
opera-10.00.gcc4-qt4.x86_64.tar.bz2 ... Passed
opera.desktop ... Passed
opera-qt4-theme.patch ... Passed
==> Extracting Sources...
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting build()...
/home/chris/opera/PKGBUILD: line 24: cd: /home/chris/opera/src/opera-10.00-4585.gcc4-qt4.x86_64: No such file or directory
sed: can't read usr/share/opera/defaults/pluginpath.ini: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: Build Failed.
Aborting...
[chris@cow opera]$
With the good help of irc people I discovered that makepkg was not extracting archives before it tried to use them to make a package. (An example in this case would be it not extracting opera-10.00.gcc4-qt4.x86_64.bz2 and then trying to use what would have resulted from its extraction to actually make the application.) This is why it would give the "No such file or directory" error.
I havn't the slightest clue why packages aren't extracting. Any ideas?
Last edited by opothehippo (2009-09-23 03:14:19)

I edited my makepkg as follows:
642 # fix flyspray #6246
643 local file_type=$(file -bizL "$file")
644 echo "FILE TYPE: $file_type"
645 local cmd=''
646 case "$file_type" in
647 *application/x-tar*|*application/zip*|*application/x-zip*|*application/x-cpio*)
648 echo "CASE TAR"
649 cmd="bsdtar -x -f" ;;
650 *application/x-gzip*)
651 echo "CASE GZIP"
652 cmd="gunzip -d -f" ;;
653 *application/x-bzip*)
654 echo "CASE BZIP"
655 cmd="bunzip2 -f" ;;
656 *application/x-xz*)
657 echo "CASE XZ"
658 cmd="xz -d -f" ;;
659 *)
660 # Don't know what to use to extract this file,
661 # skip to the next file
662 echo "CASE SKIP"
663 continue;;
664 esac
665
I ran makepkg again and received this:
==> Extracting Sources...
FILE TYPE: application/x-tar; charset=binary compressed-encoding=application/x-bzip2; charset=binary; charset=binary
CASE SKIP
FILE TYPE: text/plain; charset=utf-8
CASE SKIP
FILE TYPE: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CASE SKIP
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting build()...
/tmp/yaourt-tmp-chris/aur-opera/opera/./PKGBUILD: line 24: cd: /tmp/yaourt-tmp-chris/aur-opera/opera/src/opera-10.00-4585.gcc4-qt4.x86_64: No such file or directory
sed: can't read usr/share/opera/defaults/pluginpath.ini: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: Build Failed.
Aborting...
Error: Makepkg was unable to build opera package.
I have a limited understanding of this, I'm guessing makepkg does not recognize the binary and so it skips it?
@iBertus: Thanks for veryifying it works on you 64 bit arch. However I've had this problem on 32 bit arch also.

Group Used as LOV does not return records

Have:
1. A header table called Claims
2. A detail table called ClaimLines
3. The Claims Table has a foreign key called emp_no which refers to an employee table ( Claims for an employee)
4. The ClaimLines table has a foreign key called mem_id which refers to an employee family members table that also has emp_no as a foreign key (family members for an employee)
5. A JHS group for Claims that shows the employee name and employee id. An LOV populates the employee name and employee id
6. A details group fro CalimLines that shows family member name. An LOV populates the member name and member id. (The idea is to pull family members for the employee selected in the header section in 5 above.
Problem:
The calims LOV populates the employee name and employee id correctly.
When I move to the calimlines (details), the members who should be restricted to the employee selected in the Claims group does not return any records.
The LOV for the members is based on a VO called DependentsofEmpolyee that has a where clause emp_no=:p_emp_id (:p_emp_id is a bind parameter)
The LOV group for the members has an EL expression in the Query Bind Parameters
p_emp_id=#{bindings.ClaimsEmpId.inputValue}. The expression is to restrict the members to those who belong to the employee selected in the Claims section of the page.
Debug gives the following information:
-ViewObject DependentsOfEmployee1: bind parameter values have not changed, NO Requery performed.
It seems that the p_emp_id is not being populated with the emp_id from the header section(Claims)
The same EL expression works if applied to a dynamic LOV. The drawback of the dynamic LOV is that is only populates two fields, the value attribute and the meaning attribute. In our case we need to populate more than one attribute.

Thanks for the input.
I tried the following
1. Create a managed bean in faces-config.xml.
<managed-bean>
<managed-bean-name>FamiliyLovContext</managed-bean-name>
<managed-bean-class>FamiliyLovContext</managed-bean-class>
<managed-bean-scope>session</managed-bean-scope>
</managed-bean>
2. Updated the skeleton class FamilyLovContext.java to:
public class FamiliyLovContext {
Number empId;
public void setEmpId(Number empId) {
this.empId = empId;
public Number getEmpId() {
return empId;
3. Copied tableLovItem to tableLovItemFamily and added the following to the section
<af:selectInputText
<af:setActionListener from="#{bindings.ClaimsEmpId.inputValue}"
to="#{FamilyLovContext.empId}"/>
4. Used the the new template for the lov item in the claimlines group.
5. set the query bind parameters of the lov group to #{FamilyLovContext.empId}
I gor the following error
16:38:08 ERROR (ApplyRequestValuesPhase) -java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: argument type mismatch
javax.faces.el.EvaluationException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: argument type mismatch
     at com.sun.faces.el.ValueBindingImpl.setValue(ValueBindingImpl.java:248)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.taglib.listener.SetActionListener.processAction(SetActionListener.java:50)
     at javax.faces.event.ActionEvent.processListener(ActionEvent.java:77)
     at oracle.adf.view.faces.component.UIXComponentBase.broadcast(UIXComponentBase.java:548)
     at oracle.adf.view.faces.component.UIXEditableValue.broadcast(UIXEditableValue.java:243)
     at oracle.adf.view.faces.component.UIXSelectInput.broadcast(UIXSelectInput.java:170)
The ClaimsEmpId attribute is Number(4,0)

MDX command does not generate records: "NO RECORDS GENERATED"

Dear Experts,
I am testing MDX command we are going to use in Cashflow calculation. Although I am aware this is not typical way to do this (usually account-based calculation business rule does the job) but there are some other factors and we really want to do that in script.
I created a very simple script:
// CASHFLOW TEST
*XDIM_MEMBERSET TIME = 2014.JAN
*XDIM_MEMBERSET ENTITY = DK10
*XDIM_MEMBERSET CATEGORY = ACTUAL
*XDIM_MEMBERSET CONSOSCOPE = G_NONE
*XDIM_MEMBERSET AUDITID = IMPORT_LPM
[ACCOUNT].[#12220_F220] = ([ACCOUNT].[12220],[FLOW].[F220])
*COMMIT
but the script does not behave as I am expecting it to behave. Basically no single record gets generated by the script.
I am attaching the log. I have triple-checked the data region in question for the account 12220 and it is populated with the value.
Am I doing someting wrong?
Thank You!
Marek

Hello Marek,
I understand. If you need any documentation on MDX and Script Logic please let mw know.
You should take a look at this Performance Analysis and Optimization for BPC 10 , in particular to this part:
MDX and RSDRI query
As already recommended for BPC 7.5 splitting the report into MDX and RSDRI(SQL) queries has an positive impact on performance. By using one MDX query (as small as possible) and one RSDRI query (as large as possible) the best performance improvements were achieved. RSDRI queries are much faster, but can only be used for base level members (without aggregation). For the examples mentioned above the best performance was achieved with a split into two reports and Europe rows and 2012-Total columns as Local Members. The DB query time was reduced from about 20 seconds to 2.3 seconds while the client rendering time doubled from about 1 second to nearly 2 seconds.
Figure 10: Measurements of split reports
Thank you.
Best regards,
Raquel

Does not fetch records

The following trigger first fetch the record from paymaster. It will put the paymst_list cursor in loop, if transaction exists in the transaction(tran_list) file for the given period (form variable month) it will update the transaction file by calculating salary (variable sal),Conveyance (variable conv) etc based on number of days absent ( i.e. proportionate ). If transaction does not exists in transaction file it will take the basic from paymaster and calculate the rest.
Where as the following trigger does not work properly, it inserts the record correctly but, but will not update. I think the cursor tran_list does not fetch any record. Can any one help me Please.
DECLARE
CURSOR paymast_list IS SELECT empcode,empname,basic FROM paymast;
CURSOR tran_list(emp_id varchar2) IS
SELECT month,absent from tran where empcode = emp_id and month = :month;
tmp_empcode paymast.empcode%type;
tmp_basic paymast.basic%type;
tmp_name paymast.empname%type;
tmp_month tran.month%type;
tmp_absent tran.absent%type;
cal_sal number(12);
cal_pf number(12);
cal_conv number(12);
cal_proftax number(12);
cal_present number(4);
BEGIN
OPEN paymast_list;
LOOP
FETCH paymast_list INTO tmp_empcode,tmp_name,tmp_basic;
OPEN tran_list(tmp_empcode);
FETCH tran_list INTO tmp_month,tmp_absent;
IF tran_list%NOTFOUND THEN
cal_sal := ((tmp_basic/:total_days)*(:total_days - tmp_absent));
cal_pf := tmp_basic * 10 / 100;
cal_conv := 800;
cal_proftax := 200;
:proce_desc := tmp_name;
INSERT INTO tran (empcode,month,sal,conv,pf,pt) VALUES
(tmp_empcode,:month, cal_sal,cal_conv,cal_pf,cal_proftax);
IF tran_list%FOUND THEN
---ELSE
cal_present := :total_days - tmp_absent;
cal_sal := tmp_basic/:total_days * cal_present;
cal_pf := tmp_basic * 10 / 100;
cal_conv := 800;
cal_proftax := 200;
UPDATE tran SET sal = cal_sal,conv = cal_conv,pf = cal_pf
WHERE empcode = tmp_empcode and month = :month ;
END IF;
END IF;
CLOSE tran_list;
EXIT WHEN paymast_list%NOTFOUND;
END LOOP;
COMMIT;
CLOSE paymast_list;
END;
null

hi,
you are checking the tran_list%FOUND within the tran_list%NOTFOUND checking. You have commented the ELSE part. You should comment before tran_list%FOUND and one ENDIF. You should try once.

2LIS_03_BF standard extractor does not extract records

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for