2LIS_04_P_ARBPL ISSUE

hI ,
i AM USING standard datasource 2lis_04_p_arbpl ,i am facing some issue with data
In transaction COOIS in R/3 i am taking one production order and able see six records in an order
But in BI it is only picking five lineitems
I tried doing a full repair but still it is picking 5 record not the sixth record
Is there any kind of indicator need to be set ? to get all confirmation in an order to be transferred to BW
Regards
Karan

First of all, I am not sure whether this is the right forum where you get suitable suggestions.  Anyway, you can have a look at the following notes which may help you
1)  Note 536326 - No display in COOIS
2)  Note 563830 - 2LIS_04_P* extractors return additional rows
3)  Note 585960 - BW initial data upload, detailed setup (2)
4)  Note 760517 - COOIS: Selection of materials/components not correct
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

  • Posting date in AFRU and 2lis_04_p_arbpl data source is not matching

    Hi Experts,
    We are facing an issue with 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL data source, posting date in AFRU table and in data source is not matching.
    For example: we booked an activity confirmation of value 100 on 01.01.2015 posting date, Counter 1, Operation 10
    For the same operation another counter is confirmed on 01.02.2015 posting date.
    So, in AFRU table:
    Prod Order     Operation     Confirmation Number     Counter     PostingDate     Activity
    1001               10               8001                             1              01.01.2015       100
    1001               10               8001                             2              01.02.2015       0
    In 2lis_04_p_arbpl data source, counter field is missing due to which only 1 record is coming which is:
    Prod Order     Operation     Confirmation Number     Counter     PostingDate     Activity
    1001               10               8001                             1              01.02.2015       100
    In data source, activity of value 100 is coming on 01.02.2015 date instead in AFRU table it is booked on 01.01.2015 posting date by which we are unable to match the value in query which is based on posting date.
    Please help on this.
    Thanks,
    Sameer

    Hi Sameer,
    Please check on which date the production order has status as "completed".
    It could be on 01.02.2015.
    Thanks,
    Vimal

  • Issues with 0PP_C03 delta loads

    Hi,
    I loaded the data from 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL & 0PP_WCCP to 0PP_C03. Initialization of the data load went fine. Did the delta loads to BI and observed that I am not getting any of the Key figure data in the cube. All the values are showing as Zero.
    When I observed the in the PSA table and in the RSA3 , I observed that for every order 2 entries got created, One is with +ve values and another with u2013ve. So at the end while updating to cube its nullifying the values. Because of this reason I am not able to view the latest data which is updated as Deltas.
    I am not sure what settings I missed. Could some one please help me to fix this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Shanthi.

    Thanks Francisco Milan and Shilpa for the links. Itu2019s very useful. But still I didnu2019t able to find the cause of the issue.
    My data source 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL is of ABR type and the update mode for KF is Summation. In the data source level, I am getting the values with before & after image (same entries one with +ve & another with u2013ve) and as I am using the u201CSummation as my update type for KF its getting nullified.
    Because of this reason I could not able to get the values in my report. Could any one pls help me on this as I am reaching the go-live date. I need to address this issue immediately. Thanks for all your inputs.
    Regards,
    Shanthi.

  • Cube 0PP_C03 consists DS 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL(with int. delta), 0PP_WCCP(full)?

    Hi,
    i have an cube 0pp_c03 having DS 2lis_04_p_arbpl have option full and int. delta update for info package AND 0pp_wccp with full update.
    what type of updation for each data source will be ideal?
    Is it possible to set delta for DS other than LO - ex: 0PP_WCCP?
    Best regards,
    dushyant.

    Thanks Francisco Milan and Shilpa for the links. Itu2019s very useful. But still I didnu2019t able to find the cause of the issue.
    My data source 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL is of ABR type and the update mode for KF is Summation. In the data source level, I am getting the values with before & after image (same entries one with +ve & another with u2013ve) and as I am using the u201CSummation as my update type for KF its getting nullified.
    Because of this reason I could not able to get the values in my report. Could any one pls help me on this as I am reaching the go-live date. I need to address this issue immediately. Thanks for all your inputs.
    Regards,
    Shanthi.

  • Changes in orders arenu2019t updated in 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL datasource

    Hi experts;
    Iu2019m having a problem regarding the delta of datasource 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL.
    The problem is that some fields assign to the operations arenu2019t updated (fields like BMSCH u2013 standard from the datasource u2013 and VGW01/VGW02u2026/VGW06 u2013enhancements in the INCLUDE ZXRSAU01)
    Looking at PSA, the data assign to these fields doesnu2019t have minus in the records assign to u2018Reversal Indicatoru2019. Also, these key figures get
    double entries (the news and the originals).
    Other fields like MGVRG or PSMNG are correct.
    Looking to SNOTE 787807, we have our customization like this (OPL5):
    The Shop floor info flag as u201CUpdateu201D.
    The options for Release Version arenu2019t marked.
    Can any one help?
    Regards;
    Ricardo

    Hi Ricardo,
    Could you resolve your problem??
    I´m facing the same issue. I hope you can tell me what I have to do.
    Regards.
    Adriana AP.

  • Before image and after image is not updating correctly with 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL

    Hello BW gurus
    I am facing problem with the posting date extraction from the extractor 2lis_04_p_arbpl. I am getting incorrect before image and after image. Please let me know how to solve this problem.
    Thanks and regards
    kiran.

    Hi,
    It is difficult to check this in the Source System and there is no direct method. I can give you a workaround which we did analysed for some of delta datasources.
    Steps to be followed sequentiall once the step is successful:
    1. Create a Production order or something.. Note down the number.
    2. Check the datasource whether you get the same Production Order as delta
    3. Now do whatever confirmation etc . for the same Production Order
    4. Check the datasource (RSA3) and see wat it extracts.. might be multiple records..
          In that case just see the sequence of records.. and the changes each record has brought in.. hope this way we can simulate the delta datasource realtime..
    And if you find the sequence or somthin is correct and in BW is not updating properly then it is our fault to dig and find out further.. If the issues is at the RSA3 itself, then u can raise an OSS Message as a Bug.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Chathia.

  • 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL - Incorrect scheduled dates

    Hi All,
    I'm using the 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL enhanced with the Scheduled Start/Finish Dates from MCAFKO communication structure. After extracting, I see that the dates are not matching with the dates I see in the AFKO table. This is not for a delta load, just the init (with a setup table fill).  I confirmed that this is not a timing issue.
    Any one else faced this problem?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sree

    Mapping errors. Solved on own.

  • 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL - how this extractor fetching data from which all tables??

    Hi
    We have one DataSource 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL and we want to know all the tables of origin.
    Actually the problem is: this datasource is extracting a blank workcenter
    Suppose we have one Process Order 100000 for which this DS is giving us 4 records: out of this 4 records, 1 record is having blank workcenter and that's why we want to know how  this DS 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL is extracting data from the tables.
    I tried to run RSA3 in debug mode but it couldnt help me out much
    Also I ran trace ST05 and tried to find out tables involved,,but this method also failed
    I searched in help.sap.com but again I ended up with disappointment:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6c/61117e6c3911d3b6df0000e8359890/content.htm
    As its logistics data source so i used LBWE but at last this mehtod also not worked out.
    Request you all to help me out on this issue.
    Thanks
    Alok

    well if it was such a simple things then our extractor will give only 1 record as AFKO/AFPO table returns only 1 record for the given Process order but here we are getting 4 records.
    u can try in yr system as well. run RSA3 for same DS and pick any Process order . u will definately find more than 1 entry but AFKO/AFPO will give u one entry , especially the header table AFKO

  • 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL Delta not captured from extraction queue

    I am using datasource 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL to load 0PP_C03 cube. I have setup init selections as follows
    0PRODORDER     AUFNR     Order Number     6000000000     6999999999
    0COORD_TYPE     AUART     Order Type     ZCP1
    0PLANT     WERKS     Plant     1010
    In short I have the selections for entire range of production orders for a given plant and order type.
    I have populated setup tables, did init load with data transfer, activated the update in LBWE, scheduled V3 job, no issues here.
    When we create new production orders they are available in extraction queue MCEX04, when V3 job runs it makes it to delta queue, available in RSA7, loads into BW when delta load is done.
    Ths issue is when we TECO a production order (status marked complete) to same production order which we just loaded as delta, it does makes it to extraction queue MCEX04, but when V3 job runs it is not available in delta queue, RSA7. May I please know if this is standard behavior of this extractor or I am missing something? Why the same production order is now getting filtered by V3 job?
    Any help will be appreciated.

    Hello
    I am also facing same issue.
    but in my case, I not mapped 0recordedmode with rocancel in transformation.  
    My scenario : DS(2LIS_04_P_ARBPL) ---->DSO(Stranded DSO) ---> Info Cube. DSO and Cube is Z object.
    In cube I am having 2 records: 1 is Correct and 2nd is bad(Minus or 0 values) record.
    That bad records fetch in report with Minus or 0 values not correct one.
    Please let me know if have any concern on this.
    Thanks is advance.

  • Posting Date in 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL not always filled

    Who knows a solution to the following issue:
    The posting date (BUDAT) is used for assigning production order data (work center view) extracted with 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL to reporting periods in BW reporting.
    When testing the extraction with 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL, the field "BUDAT" is only rarely filled. (AFRU-BUDAT is filled for the concerned orders). Therefore period reporting is not possible.
    What could be the reason for the missing BUDAT, i.e. when does the extract structure MC04P_0ARB  provide a posting date? What are the conditions which need to be fulfilled in ECC system before extraction?
    Any hint for resolving the issue will be appreciated!
    Edited by: Elisabeth Liberda on Oct 9, 2008 2:39 PM

    Hi,
    Most of the times data won't fill in the base tables, because the reason is, at the time of data entrry by users, there are certain conditions , so until and un less all that conditions fullfill, then only all feilds will fill in the base tables. I faced the same problem for 2lis_04_p_matnr datasource, I'm not getting Batch, so I enhaced teh datasource. So better add ZZ feild to datasource and enhace the ds based on AFUM table (Based on the process order)
    Thanks
    Reddy

  • Actual GR Qty in 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL error

    Dear All
        I use <b>2LIS_04_P_ARBPL</b> for <b>delta</b> loading, I found error in <b>Actual GR QTY</b> when I <b>cancel confirmation</b> of Process Order. As you can use this link to display <a href="http://www.uppic.net/showpic.php?picid=acabc77f3f7b274ff1f64a821aa44e61">Result</a>
        Did someone face this problem before, and please help me how to solve this problem.
    Best regards,
    Therdsak C.

    Hi -
    Were you able to solve your issue with Delta of ARBPL extractory?

  • FIscal Period Issue

    Hi All,
      I need to create variable for fiscal year/period but in my data source  don't have fiscal period field. my data source is 2lis_04_p_arbpl. So please could anyone  tell me how to solve this issue it's urjent.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rajesh.

    Hi Rajesh,
    Create variable on the top of Fiscal year/period -- this holds the fiscal period only.
    You said you are having Fiscal year/period field right which is nothing but fiscal period.
    if you want to extract the data for fiscal period follow the below steps...
    if fiscal period is not part of you data source -- you can add the Fiscal year/period field in DSO/IC and map the date field from the source the conversion will be taken care automatically while loading the data.
    enter fiscal variant as constant - V3 or 01 -- as this is not used in your reports ....
    You can use 0ACT_START -- actual start date ... or check with functional team...
    Regards
    KP

  • New DVR Issues (First Run, Channel Switching, etc.)

    I've spent the last 30 minutes trying to find answers through the search with no luck, so sorry if I missed something.
    I recently switched to FIOS from RCN cable in New York.  I've gone through trying to setup my DVR and am running into issues and was hoping for some answers.
    1.  I setup two programs to record at 8PM, I was watching another channel at the time and only half paying attention.  Around 8:02 I noticed a message had popped up asking if I would like to switch channels to start recording.  I was expecting it to force it to switch like my old DVR, but in this case it didn't switch and I missed the first two minutes of one of the shows.  I typically leave my DVR on all day and just turn off the TV, this dual show handling will cause issues with that if I forget to turn off the DVR.  Is there a setting I can change that will force the DVR to choose one of the recording channels?
    2.  I setup all my recordings for "First Run" because I only want to see the new episodes.  One show I setup was The Daily Show on comedy central, which is shown weeknights at 11pm and repeated 3-4 times throughout the day.  My scheduled recordings is showing all these as planned recordings even though only the 11pm show is really "new".  Most of the shows I've setup are once a week so they aren't a problem, but this seems like it will quickly fill my DVR.  Any fixes?
    Thanks for the help.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I came from RCN about a year ago.  Fios is different in several ways, not all of them desirable.  Here are several ways to get--and fix--unwanted recordings from a series recording setup.
    Some general principles. 
    Saving changes.  When you originally create a series with options, or if you go back to edit the options for an existing series, You MUST save the Series Options changes.  Pretty much everywhere else in the user interface, when you change an option, the change takes effect immediately--but not in Series Options.  Look at the Series Options window.  Look at the far right side.  There is a vertical "Save" bar, which you must navigate to and click OK on to actually save your changes.  Exiting the Series Options window without having first saved your changes loses all your attempted changes--immediately.
    Default Series Options.  This is accessed  from [Menu]--DVR--Settings--Default Series Options.  This will bring up the series options that will automatically be applied to the creation of a NEW series. The options for every previously created series will not be affected by a subsequent modification of the Default Series Options.  You should set these options to the way you would like them to be for the majority of series recordings that you are likely to create.  Be sure to SAVE your changes.  This is what you will get when you select "Create Series Recording" from the Guide.  When creating a new series recording where you think that you may want options different from the default, select "Create Series with Options" instead.  Series Options can always be changed for any individual series set up later--but not for all series at once.
    Non-series recordings.  With Fios you have no directly available options for these.  With RCN and most other DVRs, you can change the start and end times for individual episodes, including individual episodes that are also in a series.  With Fios, your workarounds are to create a series with options for a single program, then delete the series later;  change the series options if the program is already in a series, then undo the changes you made to the series options later; or schedule recordings of the preceding and/or following shows as needed.
    And now, to the unwanted repeats. 
    First, make sure your series options for the specific series in question--and not just the series default options--include "First Run Only".  If not, fix that and SAVE.  Then check you results by viewing the current options using the Series Manager app under the DVR menu.
    Second, and most annoying, the Guide can have repeat programs on your channel tagged as "New".  It happens.  Set the series option "Air Time" to "Selected Time".  To make this work correctly, you must have set up the original series recording after selecting the program in the Guide at the exact time of a first run showing (11pm, in your case), and not on a repeat entry in the Guide.  Then, even it The Daily Show is tagged as New for repeat showings, these will be ignored. 
    Third, another channel may air reruns of the program in your series recording, and the first showing of a rerun episode on the other channel may be tagged as "New".  These can be ignored in your series if you set the series option "Channel" to "Selected Channel".  Related to this, if there is both an SD and HD channel broadcasting you series program, you will record them both if the series option "Duplicates" is set to "Yes".  However, when the Channel option is set to "Selected Channel", the Duplicates Option is always effectively "No", regardless of what shows up on the options screen.  
    As for you missing two minutes,  I have sereral instances in which two programs start recording at the same time.  To the best of my recollection, whenever the warning message has appeared, ignoring it has not caused a loss of recording time.  You might have an older software version.  Newest is v.1.8.  Look at Menu--Settings--System Info.  Or, I might not have noticed the loss of minutes.  I regularly see up to a minute of previous programming at the start of a recording, or a few missing seconds at the beginning or end of a recording.  There are a lot of possibilities for that, but the DVR clock being incorrect is not one of them.  With RCN, the DVR clocks occasionally drifted off by as much as a minute and a half.

  • Pension issue Mid Month Leaving

    Dear All,
    As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00.
    Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
    Please suggest.
    Ashwani

    Dear Jayanti,
    We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
    RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
    /111 EPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /139 VPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00             509.00 
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00          12,600.00 
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010                    0.00              96.25 
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00 
    /3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010                    0.00             541.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    1BAS Basic Salary           01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
                                                                                    /111 EPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /139 VPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00             628.00
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           8,822.00
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009                    0.00              99.18
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    1BAS Basic Salary           07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem  ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
    With Regards
    Ashwani

  • Open PO Analysis - BW report issue

    Hello Friends
    I constructed a query in BW in order to show Open Purchase Orders. We have custom DSO populated with standard
    datasource 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item). In this DSO we mapped the field ELIKZ to the infoobject 0COMP_DEL
    (Delivery completed).
    We loaded the data from ECC system for all POs and found the following issue for Stock Transport Purchase orders (DocType = UB).
    We have a PO with 4 line items. For line items 10 and 20, Goods issued, Goods received and both the flags "Delivery
    complete" and "Final delivery" checked. For line items 30 and 40, only delivery indicator note is issued for zero
    quantity and Delivery complete flag is checked (Final delivery flag is not checked) in ECC system. For this PO, the
    delivery completion indicator is not properly updated in the DSO for line items 30 and 40. The data looks like the
    following:
    DOC_NUM     DOC_ITEM       DOCTYPE     COMP_DEL
    650000001       10     UB        X
    650000001       20     UB        X
    650000001       30     UB
    650000001       40     UB      
    When we run the Open PO analysis report on BW side this PO is appearing in the report but the same is closed in ECC
    system.
    Any help is appreciated in this regard.
    Thanks and Regards
    sampath

    Hi Priya and Reddy
       Thanks for your response.
                         Yes the indicator is checked in EKPO table for items 30 and 40 and delta is running regularly for more than 1 year and no issues with other POs. This is happening only for few POs of type Stock Transport (UB).
                        I already checked the changes in ME23N and the Delivery completed indicator was changed and it reflected in EKPO table. Further, i checked the PSA records for this PO and i am getting the records with the Delivery completed flag but when i update from PSA to DSO the delivery completed indicator is not updating properly.
                       In PSA, for item 30 i have the following entries. Record number 42 is capturing the value X for ELIKZ but after that i am getting two more records 43 and 44 with process key 10 and without X for ELIKZ. I think this is causing the problem.
    Record No.    Doc.No.                    Item              Processkey         Rocancel     Elikz
        41               6500000001            30                    11                            X           ---    
        42               6500000001            30                    11                            ---           X
        43               6500000001            30                    10                            X           ---
        44               6500000001            30                    10                            ---         ---
    (Here --- means blank)        
    Thanks and Regards
    sampath

Maybe you are looking for