2TB TC Version 7.5 DNS Proxy to Local Server - How?

Ok, so TC Proxies DNS. Great. That means that DHCP clients get the TC IP (10.0.1.1) in my case as their DNS server. Here's the problem, I don't want TC to proxy to the ISP DNS, nor to OpenDNS,
nor to Google DNS, but to 10.0.1.2 which is my brand new mac MINI server providing DNS services.
The trouble is it will not allow you to set a local service as the primary DNS IP, only as the Secondary IP.
The problem is that aside from leaking internal network lookups to your upstream DNS service, it doesn't fail over to the secondary, so is essentially useless.
Apple, we need a way to point TC to an internal network DNS server.

Ok, Definitely this is a bug.
I decided to look into it again last night, and here's the findings.
First off, I decided to switch from google DNS to OpenDNS and so went
and change the DNS entries from 8.8.8.8 to the appropriate OpenDNS IP's.
Saved, rebooted, and the TC still had 8.8.8.8 as the DNS entry.... ***?
So, reset to factory settings.
Config everything again, and this time set the DNS to the internal 10.0.1.2/3
IP's. Voila, works great, kept the internal DNS and proxies to it just fine.
Enabled guest network, which hands out the TC as the DNS server, rather than
the servers on the internal network.
You should not have to reset to factory settings to reset the DNS entries.
Also, it would be better/desirable if the GUI allowed setting the DNS servers
for the primary and guest network individually. That way you can set the guest
to use something other than your ISP (eg. openDNS) and set the primary to use
the internal DNS server on say a mac-mini.
BTW, the reason that you want to do this is, is that you can then setup an internal
network (eg. home.net) and put devices on it, named in the local DNS server.
Anyway, it now works, but Apple pls fix, and document better.

Similar Messages

  • DNS Issues with Time Capsule - DNS Proxy periodically dies

    hi all .... looking for some suggestions
    I have a time capsule 1TB, connected to a linksys adsl modem in bridge mode, with the TC acting as DHCP server for my local clients. In the PPPoE settings I also enter the primary and secondary addresses for DNS that my ISP supplied.
    I am able to successfully connect to the internet, and all clients successfully pick up an IP address, and each client picks up the TC as the DNS proxy. Everything works perfectly as it should.
    Usually once per day, there seems to be a slight hickup with the internet connection (hard to tell whether I am losing the PPPoE or some other issue). When this happens, the PPPoE connection remains active, as I am able to access anything on the internet from an IP level. However, the DNS proxy service on the TC seems to die and as a result, all internet browsing fails. If I reboot the TC, everything comes back to normal. If I dont reboot, the only way to get browsing working is to manually enter the DNS IP address from ISP into the client PCs. However, this is a manual fix that I should not have to perform.
    Looking for advice and guidance. Seems like a bug but I cant tell. If I was able to set the DHCP server to pass out the ISP supplied addresses that would also work, but I cant.

    Just got off the phone with support for this very same problem. DNS Proxy is definitely dying in the TC, looks like a firmware issue to me.
    This is the 3rd TC I'm on. First was a 500GB, had this problem, replaced it under warranty at Apple's direction, replacement did the same, just upgraded this weekend to 1GB, and same issue still. All on 7.3.2 firmware.
    TC 1TB, PPPoE to my ISP, ISP's DNS Servers listed in the PPPoE config in the TC.
    When a host gets DHCP from the TC the only DNS returned is the TC itself, since it proxies the ISP DNS servers.
    Once every day or two, the DNS proxy dies. local network works, and I can add my ISP's DNS addresses in my host config and I have DNS again, but this is definitely something dying in the DNS proxy in the TC.
    Just for kicks trying to switch from my ISP's DNS servers to OpenDNS now since someone said that worked for them, but I am not hopeful... I don't see this as a host DNS issues at all.
    The dead proxy is very clear:
    $ nslookup apple.com. 192.168.1.1 # that's the TC
    Server: 192.168.1.1
    Address: 192.168.1.1#53
    ** server can't find apple.com: SERVFAIL
    $ nslookup apple.com. 208.67.222.222 # that's OpenDNS
    Server: 208.67.222.222
    Address: 208.67.222.222#53
    Non-authoritative answer:
    Name: apple.com
    Address: 17.149.160.49
    I replaced a linksys router with the TC and am kind of unhappy that a $500 router dies every couple of days. My cheapo Linksys router never needed to be restarted, it only ever got rebooted once every year or so when the house lost power long enough for the UPS to run out of battery.
    Help us out here Apple, I replaced a $50 router with a $500 because I like the flavor of your kool aid, and this thing dies every day or two. Even if you can't fix why the proxy is dying every couple of days, can you please at least update the firmware to maybe restart the proxy if it quits working?

  • LRT214 DNS Proxy stops working

    Hi,
    I have been using the LRT214 for a few months now. I have a few hostnames in the 'Internal DNS list' for internal devices. So I set DHCP to use 'DNS Proxy' and then set the LRT214 to use google dns.
    It works well most of the time - clients can resolve internal dns that I configure on the LRT and they are proxied to google dns for everything else.
    However about once a month the DNS proxy/server on the LRT stops working and doesn't resolve anything anymore.  The only way to get it back is to reboot the LRT and it then starts working immediately.
    This is very frustrating for my users and I am considering replacing the device.  Does anyone have any suggestions?
    Thanks
    Rob

    What firmware version are you running?
    An option would be to run a DNS Server on your LAN.
    Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
    Linksys
    Communities Technical Support

  • SRP541w DNS Proxy issue

    I'm running FW 1.02.01 (23) and I'm having problems with the DNS proxy.  I have DNS Proxy enabled for my DHCP server on the router and I have my dns server programmed into the global dns location.  I cannot ping any DNS names for my IPSEC VPN tunnel.
    Thanks,
    Adam De Lay

    Hi Adam,
    Could I first recommend that you upgrade to version 1.2.4.  This is available for free download, just go to www.cisco.com/go/srp500 and look for the link on the right.
    If you are still seeing the issue after upgrade, could you please grab the device status file (Administration > Remote Support) and send to me please. [Don't post it here]
    Regards,
    Andy

  • Full NAT dns proxy is not working in Windows 7

    Back in XP, I can activate the Windows full blown NAT service via RemoteAccess and IpNat (I turned off SharedAccess as it's not compatible with RemoteAccess) and use netsh to configure it. I activated the dns proxy via 'netsh routing ip dnsproxy' context.
    It works very well all these years.
    Now using Windows 7, I can't make it work anymore. I have copied over both ipmontr.dll & ippromon.dll from Windows 2K8 R2, and install those helper to my Windows 7 netsh. I can access 'netsh routing ip dnsproxy' context. But enabling the the DNS proxy
    doesn't do anything. DNS Request (UDP port 53) coming form the client in the private LAN served by this PC just sinked in, no response. I don't see any DNS request attempt on the public network interface of this PC.
    From 'netstat -na', I don't see UDP port 53 on private network interface is opened. In XP, I can see it's opened and closed as I enable or disable the DNS proxy on 'netsh routing ip dnsproxy' context. I enable the firewall log to see if the firewall block
    it, but I see absolutely nothing related to the DNS request.
    Is there a missing step to enable a full blown NAT service in Windows 7 that I missed? Pls help.
    Thx

    Thank you all for replies, but ICS is NOT an option. It can only handle 1 private network and limited to 192.168.0.0/24. In our test framework we need 2 private network and use 172.20.0.0/14. Using Windows Server is way too expensive, we have so many test
    benches that each having their private network the above for test isolation. We only need NAT functionality, not the whole Windows Server functionality.
    I also found out, despite netsh manage to configure the NAT, but actually no NATing is taken any place. Not only the DNS proxy, but the whole NAT just not happening.
    IMHO, removing it from Win7 is a mistake, not every one need the whole server functionality. We have decided to use linux instead. So we cancel the plan to upgrade to Win7 and go linux. Microsoft could have got some license fee from the Win7 we plan to puchase,
    but this is a deal killer for us as NAT is the core of our test framework based on. Not ideal for us as we have many win native based tools, but since we are already moving to python, I guess moving to linux is the answer for us.
    Had Win7 still has the full NAT capability as in WinXP, I do prefer to stay on windows, but we have to move on as WinXP is no longer supported.
    I consider this thread is close. Thank you all.

  • Need help with load balancing and DNS proxy

    Hi,
    I need help on how to configure my router so it will work with my DNS proxy and load balancing.
    I have a Linksys LRT224 router. I have two broadband connections from two separate ISPs,500Mbps each (WAN1 & WAN2). WAN1 has a static IP and WAN2 is dynamic assigned. I use Unlocator (www.unlocator.com) so I can access geographically restricted sites (Pandora, Netflix, etc.).
    The problem I have is that unlocator registers only one IP address (WAN1 address) and since I am doing load balancing I have no way of knowing if the DNS request will go through the registered IP (WAN1) or through the other (WAN2). I am not an expert in routing or networking but I'm guessing I have a way of configuring the router so all the DNS requests go out through WAN1, right?
    In the router's Dual WAN config page there is a section for Protocol Binding. I tried to configure but only managed to screw up the internet at home. I used:
    DNS[UDP/53-53]->192.168.1.1-192.168.1.254(0.0.0.0-0.0.0.0)WAN2
    Any help or suggestions are appreciated.
    Alex

    Good solution though. That's probably the only way you could do true Load Balancing anyway.
    Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
    Linksys
    Communities Technical Support

  • Need help with load balancing and DNS proxy -Repost

    Hi,
    I need help on how to configure my router so it will work with my DNS proxy and load balancing.
    I have a Linksys LRT224 router. I have two broadband connections from two separate ISPs,500Mbps each (WAN1 & WAN2). WAN1 has a static IP and WAN2 is dynamic assigned. I use Unlocator (www.unlocator.com) so I can access geographically restricted sites (Pandora, Netflix, etc.).
    The problem I have is that unlocator registers only one IP address (WAN1 address) and since I am doing load balancing I have no way of knowing if the DNS request will go through the registered IP (WAN1) or through the other (WAN2). I am not an expert in routing or networking but I'm guessing I have a way of configuring the router so all the DNS requests go out through WAN1, right?
    In the router's Dual WAN config page there is a section for Protocol Binding. I tried to configure but only managed to screw up the internet at home. I used:
    DNS[UDP/53-53]->192.168.1.1-192.168.1.254(0.0.0.0-​0.0.0.0)WAN2
    Any help or suggestions are appreciated.
    Alex

    Good solution though. That's probably the only way you could do true Load Balancing anyway.
    Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
    Linksys
    Communities Technical Support

  • Best way to replace DNS Proxy

    I've always run BorderManager's DNS Proxy for our internal DNS server. It works great due to it checking the hosts file first before forwarding the DNS request to the Internet. So, I'd put all of the servers and their internal IP address in the hosts file and point all the workstations at the BorderManager server for DNS.
    Now, I need to replace that same functionality with something else. Preferably something that will run on SLES 11 or OES2.
    I'm not experienced with BIND or any other DNS server. Do other products reference the local hosts file first or was that something unique to BorderManager?
    All suggestions greatly appreciated!
    -Farren

    farren,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://support.novell.com/forums/

  • E3000 - no dns proxy feature?

    I just purchased a E3000 and it appears that there is no DNS proxy feature with this router.   Is that true?  If so, any suggestions on how to use static IP addressing without having use static DNS as well.   I've always set my router as DHCP and then point all my computers to resolve DNS through the router.  This works great and I can't believe the E3000 doesn't support it?

    The issue is that since I can't use the e3000 as a DNS proxy I have to enter my ISP's DNS explicitly on all my computers.  I don't like to do this since my ISP can change/has changed DNS in the past and it requires me to touch all my computers.  I run lots of VM's (40 or so) and it requires me to change each one individually.   If I can point DNS @ the router then when the ISP makes any changes it is automatically picked up by the computers. I also perform some other voodoo with the VMware network settings which allows my VM's to move from office network to outside network with minimum config changes and this relies on the existance of the DNS Proxy feature.
    I know that I can use DHCP on the endpoints but for several reasons this is not an option in my environment.  I need to use static ip for my computers.
    This is enough of a hassle that I might need to return the router.   Any recommendations of a gig wireless N router that has DNS proxy functionality?

  • Disable dns proxy

    How can I disable dns proxy on my wrt54g router?
    Thanks in advance
    Theo

    hi...there is no DNS proxy in the linksys router's as such....
    if you have any problems let me know the issue in detail ..

  • DNS Issues - Can ping server name and IPs but not FQDNs.

    Hi All, 
    Hopefully some one can help me here, I am having an issue where one of my domain attached servers cannot ping any FQDNs in the environment but it can ping the host names and the IPs and look up the host names from a reverse look up. 
    We have done the following troubleshooting:
    Flushed and registered DNS cache.
    Restarted the DNS client and net logon services on the effected server
    Preformed standard checks and commands such as:
    Checked the event logs and found there were warnings for DNS registration.
    Compared the DNS settings in the network adapters across the rest of the servers in the environment and found that they were all the same. DNS Suffixes are added in the correct order and are set to register.
    Pinging FQDNs which is not giving any results.
    Tracert FQDNs which is also not giving any results.
    Nslookup which is querying the DNS server directly and giving results as expected
    Ran the command which reported successful: dcdiag /test:registerindns /dnsdomain:sub.domain.net /v
    Checked and updated the permissions on DNS for the affected server to give the server full control of its own DNS entry. 
    Replaced the DNS Client service DLL with one from a server that is working as expected. 
    Also worth noting is that the affected server (as well as every other server in the environment) has 2 NICs, one that communicates with DNS and AD and the other does not have any DNS IPs set. 
    Not this is not the first time this happened, a reboot fixed the issue before but it seems to be a reoccurring problem now. 
    If any one can shed some light on this issue I would be grateful.
    Regards,
    Steve. 

    Hi Steve,
    First, we should confirm if this issue is caused by DNS.
    When you ping the FQDN, does the server show the correct corresponding IP address?
    If no, there should be some error messages. If it is possible, please post the screenshot of this issue.
    To check the process about how does server resolve the FQDN, please follow the steps below:
    clear local DNS cache with command ipconfig /flushdns
    perform the network capture
    ping the specified FQDN
    Check the DNS traffic
    To download Network Monitor, please click the link below:
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-hk/download/details.aspx?id=4865
    Besides, have you tried to update the NIC driver to the latest version?
    Best Regards.
    Steven Lee Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • DNS Fails for NFS Server Shares

    When I boot, I get a message that DNS has failed for the NFS server mounts, and the shares do not mount. The message says, "mount.nfs: DNS resolution failed for server: name or service unknown." I have to mount the shares myself. Then when rebooting, I get the same error saying it can't unmount the shares.
    this is /etc/resolv.conf:
    $ cat /etc/resolv.conf
    # Generated by dhcpcd from eth0
    # /etc/resolv.conf.head can replace this line
    nameserver 208.67.222.222
    nameserver 208.67.220.220
    # /etc/resolv.conf.tail can replace this line
    this is /etc/conf.d/nfs:
    # Number of servers to be started up by default
    NFSD_OPTS=8
    # Options to pass to rpc.mountd
    # e.g. MOUNTDOPTS="-p 32767"
    MOUNTD_OPTS="--no-nfs-version 1 --no-nfs-version 2"
    # Options to pass to rpc.statd
    # N.B. statd normally runs on both client and server, and run-time
    # options should be specified accordingly. Specifically, the Arch
    # NFS init scripts require the --no-notify flag on the server,
    # but not on the client e.g.
    # STATD_OPTS="--no-notify -p 32765 -o 32766" -> server
    # STATD_OPTS="-p 32765 -o 32766" -> client
    STATD_OPTS=""
    # Options to pass to sm-notify
    # e.g. SMNOTIFY_OPTS="-p 32764"
    SMNOTIFY_OPTS=""
    Do I need to add some option to rpc.statd, or is there some other misconfiguration there? AFAIK it is the default. What else should I look at to fix this? I can ping the server by name, and log in with ssh by name, just fine. It's only the nfs that is failing with DNS.

    airman99 wrote:
    Yahoo! Good news, I've finally solved the problem on my laptop. The message I was receiving turned out merely to be a network timing issue.
    The error I was receiving was exactly correct and informative. When /etc/rc.d/netfs ran and executed a 'mount -a -t nfs...' the network was indeed NOT reachable. I am running networkmanager, and apparently during bootup, networkmanager gets loaded, but there is a delay between when networkmanager is loaded and when the network is available. In other words, networkmanager allows the boot process to continue before the network is available.
    My daemons are loaded in this order (rc.conf):
    DAEMONS=(syslog-ng hal dhcdbd networkmanager crond cups ntpdate ntpd portmap nfslock netfs)
    Consequently, if I add a delay to /etc/rc.d/netfs to allow time for the network to come up, then when the NFS shares are mounted, the network is up. In my case I had to add a 3 second delay.
    sleep 3
    I'm sure this isn't the best way to solve the problem, by editing the system file /etc/rc.d/netfs, because the next upgrade where changes occur to netfs, my fix will get overwritten. But I'll keep it until I figure out the "right" fix.
    The real solution is to not load networkmanager in the background, but to force startup to wait for the networok to be up before continuing.
    there is the _netdev option you can use in fstab, but that doesn't always work:
    http://linux.die.net/man/8/mount
    _netdev
        The filesystem resides on a device that requires network access (used to prevent the system from attempting to mount these filesystems until the network has been enabled on the system).
    Alternatively, you could just add a cronjob to do a mount -a with a sleep 20 in there or something. You might have to play with the sleep value a little to make sure it's long enough

  • GWIA doing DNS lookup for local address

    Hello,
    I am running GW8.0.2 on Netware 6.5sp8. I have a server that our recreation department uses to send out confirmation emails when a customer signs up for a class. The recreation server and the GWIA are on the same subnet.
    Here's the problem: When the Rec server sends out the first email confirmation, it gets sent out successfully. Subsequent emails after that fail. After about twenty minutes the next email will go out OK again but subsequent emails will fail.
    The verbose logs on the GWIA don't tell me much but the diagnostic logs show what looks like a reverse DNS lookup happening at the GWIA for my local IP address of 10.0.0.3 (the Rec server). This reverse DNS lookup fails (probably a timeout) and subsequent emails from this local Rec server get dropped by the GWIA without the DNS lookup.
    DNS is being done by DNS proxy on Bordermanager 9.2. I've bypassed the Bordermanager DNS and the same thing happens. I've made entries for the local Rec server into a route.cfg file but the GWIA seems to want to ignore these entries and keeps doing the DNS lookup.
    The wierdest part of the puzzle is that if I restart the proxy on the Bordermanager the next email will go out with, of course, subsequent emails failing. I've looked at the proxy dns cache and can't even find an entry for my Rec server.
    Attached are the entries from the Diagnostic logs of the GWIA. Novell tech support has assured me that the GWIA and the BM are working fine. I am also having this problem with a scanner that scans then emails but all other email and Bordermanager are functioning fine. This server and scanner were not having this problem before upgrading to GW8.0.2.
    I don't understand why GWIA is doing DNS lookups for a local address and I don't know what I can do to stop it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    This is a successful transfer right after restarting the proxy: 10.0.0.3 is the Rec server, 10.0.0.130 is the GWIA and 10.0.0.1 is the Bordermanager.
    16:04:13 D15 NgwResQuery(3.0.0.10.in-addr.arpa, 1, 12)
    16:04:13 D15 Querying server (# 1) address = 10.0.0.1
    16:04:13 D15 HEADER:
    16:04:13 D15 opcode = QUERY, id = 17615, rcode = SERVFAIL, flags: qr aa rd
    16:04:13 D15 query = 1, answer = 0, authority = 0, additional = 0
    16:04:13 D15
    16:04:13 D15 QUESTIONS:
    16:04:13 D15 3.0.0.10.in-addr.arpa, type = PTR, class = IN
    16:04:13 D15
    16:04:13 D15 rcode = 2, ancount=0
    16:04:13 D15 NgwResQuery failed
    16:04:13 D15 DMN: MSG 2000909 Accepted connection: [10.0.0.3] ()
    16:04:13 D15 Successful login with client/server access: 10.0.0.130:1677
    16:04:13 D15 DMN: MSG 2000909 Receiving file: ECMAIL/SYS:\PROGRAMS\GRPWISE\WPGATE\GWIA\3RD\receive\df30 fad4.221
    16:04:13 D15 DMN: MSG 2000909 SMTP session ended: [10.0.0.3] ()
    This is an unsuccessful transfer:
    16:06:08 D04 timeout
    16:06:08 D04 NgwResQuery: send error
    16:06:08 D04 NgwResQuery failed
    16:06:08 D04 DMN: MSG 2000933 Accepted connection: [10.0.0.3] ()
    16:06:08 D04 DMN: MSG 2000933 SMTP session ended: [10.0.0.3] ()
    Then the successful email comes back into the system:
    16:06:26 AA8 MSG 2000909 Processing inbound message: ECMAIL/SYS:\PROGRAMS\GRPWISE\WPGATE\GWIA\receive\DF30FAD4 .221
    16:06:26 AA8 MSG 2000909 Sender: [email protected]
    16:06:26 AA8 MSG 2000909 Recipient: [email protected]
    16:06:26 AA8 MSG 2000909 Queuing to MTA
    16:06:26 AA8 MSG 2000909 File: ECMAIL/SYS:\PROGRAMS\GRPWISE\WPGATE\GWIA\wpcsin\4\4daf048 2.8m1 Message Id: (4DAF66F2.B67:244:35687) Size: 163.3 Kb

    Thanks Massimo. I could have swore I already did that but when I did it again just to make sure it solved the problem. Appreciate the help. Have a good one.
    Originally Posted by mrosen
    On 02.05.2011 21:06, avanrav wrote:
    >
    > Hello,
    >
    > I am running GW8.0.2 on Netware 6.5sp8. I have a server that our
    > recreation department uses to send out confirmation emails when a
    > customer signs up for a class. The recreation server and the GWIA are on
    > the same subnet.
    >
    > Here's the problem: When the Rec server sends out the first email
    > confirmation, it gets sent out successfully. Subsequent emails after
    > that fail. After about twenty minutes the next email will go out OK
    > again but subsequent emails will fail.
    >
    > The verbose logs on the GWIA don't tell me much but the diagnostic logs
    > show what looks like a reverse DNS lookup happening at the GWIA for my
    > local IP address of 10.0.0.3 (the Rec server). This reverse DNS lookup
    > fails (probably a timeout) and subsequent emails from this local Rec
    > server get dropped by the GWIA without the DNS lookup.
    >
    > DNS is being done by DNS proxy on Bordermanager 9.2. I've bypassed the
    > Bordermanager DNS and the same thing happens. I've made entries for the
    > local Rec server into a route.cfg file but the GWIA seems to want to
    > ignore these entries and keeps doing the DNS lookup.
    >
    > The wierdest part of the puzzle is that if I restart the proxy on the
    > Bordermanager the next email will go out with, of course, subsequent
    > emails failing. I've looked at the proxy dns cache and can't even find
    > an entry for my Rec server.
    The reverse DNS done by GWIA is normal, and can't be stopped or tricked.
    That it fails in such odd ways must be a bug with the reverse DNS proxy
    of Bordermanager though. Apparently on the second lookups, it doesn't
    answer in a timely manner (the type of answer is irrelevant, just it
    *has* to answer). Use a different, "real" DNS server for your GWIA.
    CU,
    Massimo Rosen
    Novell Product Support Forum Sysop
    No emails please!
    Untitled Document

  • I have downloaded the latest pages  update on my iPad, but my iMac still has version 4.3 and I cannot find out how to update it only desktop. When I try to send something from my iPad pages to via email to be opened on my desktop in Pages, it won't open P

    I have downloaded the latest pages update on my iPad, but my iMac still has Pages version 4.3, and I cannot find out how to update it on my desktop. When I try to send something from my iPad pages via email to be opened on my desktop in Pages, it won't open in Pages. I get a message that it can't be opened because the version is too old. I sent the document as a PDF and it worked. But I want to be able to use Pages back and forth. HOw do I update the Pages version on my desktop iMac?

    The file format used by the iOS versions of the iWork apps can only be read by the new iWork apps on your Mac - i.e. Keynote 6, Pages 5 & Numbers 3. Those versions for the Mac require Mavericks, OS X 10.9. The "too old" error on a Mac comes if you are trying to open an iWork '08 or earlier file in the newest apps. If you do have the newest apps you can open the files from your iPad.
    If you can't or don't want to upgrade to Mavericks & the newest iWork apps your best option would be to export/share the files from the iPad to a type an older version of iWork can read such as Word, text, Excel, etc.
    Or contact AppleCare. They made this mess, let them fix it.

  • Issue with opening a site in SharePoint Designer 2010 -The version of SharePoint foundation running on the server is more recent than the version of SPD you are using, you need a more recent version of SPD.

    I have a SharePoint site which I am trying to open in SPD 2010, I am getting the following error(some of my team members are able to open)
    The version of SharePoint foundation running on the server is more recent than the version  of SPD you are using, you need a more recent version of SPD.
    These are the ways I tried
    1) Earlier I have MS office 32 bit and SPD 32 bit, I uninstalled them and installed both 64 bit versions
    2) I uninstalled restarted my machine and installed it again still no use.
    3) I installed SPD 2010 Service Pack 2 of 64 bit
    4) I uninstalled the SPD 2010 and opened the site—site actions—edit page in SPD , then it asked me to install SPD 2010, then I installed and tried to open the same site, again same error.
    How to solve this issue?
    I checked permissions also at that site level – I have full control like others. I don’t have access to Central Admin so where else I can check the permission settings?

    Please update us SharePoint version 
    Regards,
    Pratik Vyas | SharePoint Consultant |
    http://sharepointpratik.blogspot.com
    Posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights
    Please remember to click Mark As Answer if a post solves your problem or
    Vote As Helpful if it was useful.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Pressing "Today" on iPhone no longer working in Calendar List view...?!

    Using iPhone 3GS v3.1.2 with MobileMe. Up until a couple of days ago, the iPhone Calendar was working fine. Now, however, when I press Today in >list< view it takes me to >yesterday's< calendar items. (Today button works fine in Day and Month views)

  • Native Window EventListeners?

    I have my AIR app automatically opening at fullscreen: private  function toggleFullScreen():void {           stage.displayState = ( stage.displayState == StageDisplayState.FULL_SCREEN_INTERACTIVE ) ?      StageDisplayState.NORMAL : StageDisplayState.

  • Problem in SALV

    Hello all , I created a report using SALV, the problem is after i exit the ALV unstead of going back to the selection screen , I get an empty screen like list screen with the name of the program as title. When I check the name of the program screen i

  • Problems with Mavericks install - suggestions, please?

    I installed Mavericks, but since then my MacBook Air has been slow and sometimes crashing. There was a problem during installation - a password was not accepted. Any suggestions on how to fix this?

  • Account Factsheet NO_MATCHING_LINK error when using own role

    Hello, we have EP6 and CRM-Business Productivity Pack BPP 60.1.2 I want to use the BW Factsheet for Account. I get it to run when i assign role SAP_PCC_V02_SALES_ASSISTANT for the user in backend CRM system. However i want to use it with our own defi