3.1.3 is much faster than 4.0 why?

I have conducted several speed tests. Its very disappointing. The only time 4.0 is faster is when multitasking and when the Apps are already open and eating battery. Why is 4.0 firmware soooo much slower?

kesajen wrote:
Does anyone know how to go back to 3.1.3? I have 16GB 3GS, running iOS4, and my phone runs VERY slow!! It's so frustrating. I don't really care about multi tasking, or any other goodie that came with 4. I want to go back to the old OS.
Any help out there?
I know how but can't say

Similar Messages

  • Why is my iMac 450/128 much, much faster than my Powerbook 333/512?

    Hey boys and girls,
    I'm sort of new to the Mac world, but I'm working hard to become clever.
    So, here's the story. I have a Powerbook Bronze 333MHz with 512MB of RAM and the Toshiba 6GB drive it was born with and 10.3.9. I have a Bumbleberry (I think that's the "official" colour) iMac at work with a G3 at 450MHz and only 128MB of RAM also running 10.3.9.
    The iMac runs much, much faster than the Powerbook, despite barely meeting the minimum RAM requirements of 10.3. What are some possible reasons for this? I understand that this ain't no speed machine, but the Powerbook is so slow that there is a second or two second typing delay in an Adium chat window for heaven's sake.
    OK, so the iMac is technically faster, but I feel as though there is something wrong with the performance of the Powerbook, especially with all the RAM I've thrown at it (the Activity Monitor says that the PB has roughly 140MB of free RAM right now). I have a newer 40GB 5400 RPM drive that I'm tempted to install, to see if the 6GB drive is just old and tired (it whines a bit, so I'm sure it is to some degree) -- am I wasting my time?
    Thanks for any help in advance.
    Ugli
    PB Bronze   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

    ugli:
    Welcome to Apple Discussions.
    You are well on the way to becoming clever. Really. Just by logging in and posting here you have started a process of learning that can go on until you are really clever.
    There are a number of reasons your iMac seems faster that the Lombard. One is that it has a faster processor. Secondly, even with more RAM your Lombard has a small, slow HDD. I don't know how much free space there is on your HDD, but 6 GB fills up quite quickly these days. I am sure the larger (and faster) HDD will make a difference. I had maxxed out the RAM on my Pismo, but it was when I installed a larger, faster HDD that I noticed the difference. And, of course, when I upgraded the processor I noticed the biggest difference. Still not match for the newer faster machines, but then, I'm not as fast as I used to be either.
    Good luck in your quest.
    cornelius
    PismoG4 550, 100GB 5400 Toshiba internal, 1 GB RAM; Pismo 500 OS X (10.4.5) Mac OS X (10.4.5) Beige G3 OS 8.6

  • Sun Studio 12 is still much faster than the newest express 11/08

    I gave the newest Express 11/08 a try on my laptop. I found that Studio 12 is still
    much faster than the express version at least on my laptop. See the old messge below.
    http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5321607&tstart=15
    I think poor performance is a bug for a compiler. Sun should fix it.

    I think poor performance is a bug for a compiler. Sun should fix it.Thanks for noting :)
    This has already been filed as a bug - http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6735472.
    And as you can see it is even already fixed.
    Unluckily it missed Express 11/08 integration time slot (by a mere week or so).
    It is reasonable to expect it to be available at the next Express/whatever release happens next.
    regards,
    __Fedor.

  • If i export my project, it runs much faster than in the canvas. How can I fix that?

    If i export my project, it runs much faster than in the canvas. How can I fix that?
    I'm from germany, sorry for my english!

    When you export your project, it is "compiled" into video format. Any player will play it at its frame rate.
    Motion is a compositing application. It has to make many more times the calculations needed to animate everything and 90% of the time, it's just not possible for Motion to keep up with "real time".  It's to be expected. Learning to live with that fact will make life a lot easier for you, I promise.
    There are a few things you can do to help speed up Motion:
    Reduce temporary play ranges to no more than about 5 seconds at a time. You can move the Play Range In and Out markers from section to section. Motion does all of its real time rendering in RAM. The longer the play range, to more it has to work managing that memory.
    Remove Preview Icons from the Layers list ( View menu > Layers Columns > Preview will toggle the views)
    When you play your animation, turn off on screen guides: (command - / will toggle onscreen guides)
    In Motion 5, reducing the quality of playback from the Render menu does not make a lot of difference anymore, so you might as well keep the default settings of Dynamic, Full and Normal on. However, Motion Blur, Frame Blending, Field Rendering, as well as the lighting options will affect playback, sometimes by quite a lot. So if you have Lights, turning off Lighting, Shadows, and Reflections will get back a lot of real time playback speed (just remember to turn on all that you need before rendering, or these things will be left out of the export!)
    HTH

  • 3G much faster than WiFi now?

    Ever since I purchased the 3G iPhone my 3G performance is MUCH faster than my WiFi connection. My old iPhone was very fast on my WiFi connection but the new 3G iPhone is MUCH slower using the WiFi connection. It's so much slower that I have permanently turned WiFi OFF. My WiFi network is exactly the same. The only thing that has changed is the phone. I thought it would get better with the latest update but it hasn't. Anyone else experiencing this??

    Here are the results from my speed tests.
    3G TEST:
    262 kbps (Latency probe response is 300ms)
    317 kbps (Latency probe response is 300ms)
    572 kbps (Latency probe response is 300ms)
    293 kbps (Latency probe response is 300ms)
    589 kbps (Latency probe response is 300ms)
    AVERAGE SPEED IS 406kbps
    WiFi TEST:
    1763kbps (initial latency probe is 35976ms, rest are roughly 140ms)
    1543kbps (initial latency probe is 36095ms, rest are roughly 140ms)
    2239kbps (initial latency probe is 441ms, rest are roughly 140ms)
    CRASH (Had to restart Safari)
    1780kbps (initial latency probe is 22810ms, rest are roughly 140ms)
    1656kbps (initial latency probe is 29863ms, 28364ms, rest are roughly 140ms)
    2084kbps (initial latency probe is 411ms, rest are roughly 140ms)
    AVERAGE SPEED IS 1844kbps
    The problem with my WiFi is the initial connection takes forever. Once it gets going it is much faster. Looks like I have massive turbo lag. Since the initial WiFi ping takes longer than the entire 10 pings of the 3G test the WiFi connection “appears” much slower. Not good.
    Anyone have any idea how I can fix this? Should I try and return the phone?

  • Why is Chrome so much faster than Safari?

    I'm an Apple and Safari lover, but love goes only so far. I have tried everything with Safari in Yosemite, but it's really in a sad state when it won't even open my Google account page, or my own website. Sadly, I have found so many pages that either load so slowly that I give up, or don't open at all in Safari, yet Chrome always works, and fast. In fact, Firefox and Opera, both of which I have never used regularly are much better than Safari right now.
    Does anyone have a clue as to why Safari has turned into such a poor browser in Yosemite? But please don't suggest I go to safe mode. I only want a decent browser, which I would prefer was Safari and not Chrome, but I do not want to deconstruct or rebuild my Macbook Air OS installation.

    Funny. I'm finding exactly the opposite to be true. I've used Chrome since it came out, and it used to be far superior to Safari. Lately I find it to be very buggy--lots of jittery, time consuming page loads and crashes. Frustrated, I imported all of my stuff to Safari where loading times, scrolling, and navigation are like butter. No crashes and no loading issues on my MB Pro. So far so good.
    I do wonder if it has something to do with the "baggage" I developed on Chrome over the years. I kept things pretty tidy--purging history, cookies, etc-- but it still just kept getting worse.
    I guess Firefox is an option, but one thing is certain: I will not be returning to IE ****.

  • New Mac Pro 8-core / D700 not much faster than an iMac... in PPro CC.

    So.... my very preliminary testing with our new Mac Pro using the plugin I use most (filmconvert -FC) anyway, shows that Premiere CC needs more optimization for the dual GPUs. In fact, I'd say the CPU utilization is not up to snuff either.
    I know FC only uses one GPU presently from the developer. That will change. In the meantime, using a couple of typical projects with that plugin as an example, I'm only seeing 25-45% speed up in renders over our maxed out iMac (late 2012, 27") exporting the same project. That's significant of course but not the 100%+ one would think we would be seeing at the least given the MacPro config of 8 cores and dual D700s. Premiere Pro CC seems in fact to never maximize CPU (never mind GPUs). I have yet, in my very limited testing, see it "pin the meters" like I did on the iMac.
    Of course that's just testing now two short (under 5 min) projects, and it depends on what one is doing. Some stuff is much, much faster like Red Giant's Denoiser II or Warp Stabilizer VFX. The improvement there can be 3-4x faster anecdotally.  I used to avoid them for speed reasons unless absolutely needed a lot of the time but now they are fast enough to rely on quickly. Other stuff unrelated top PPro CC like DxO PRIME noise removal on RAW stills is much faster too, as is Photoshop CC.  Some effects like blur, sharpening, resize there are nearly instant now even on giga pixel files in Photoshop CC.
    And of course FCPX is much faster on it but I hate the whole editing paradigm. The timeline is just horrid on it; simple things like replacing a word in someone's dialogue is a multi click, multistep process that is nearly instant in Premiere and most every other NLE. Just to try to see your whole timeline is a chore, to see what your edits and sound are in detail are problematic, trying to keep things in sync is a chore, and you can't even zoom your timeline window to full screen! If anybody has edited for any amount of time, I do not understand how they use FCP X. If they start with that program, for example if they are young, then that is a different beast.
    I'm sure Adobe will improve over time. They have to to stay competitive. In the meantime I'll take my 45%... but I wish I saw much more improvement given the cost and hardware differential. Unfortiunately, for now, the mainstream reviews I have seen regarding PPro performance on this machine were right.

    That statement about 4k/5k in Premiere CC with the nMP is false, insofar as performance goes.
    I just tested 5K Red raw files just dragged into Premiere Pro CC (latest version). I expected this to be slow, given my HD experience. However, on my 8 core/D700, I can play 1/2 just fine, full speed. And I even can also do that with a very streneous plugin/filter attached - FilmConvert (in OpenCL mode), also at 1/2 which is quite impressive. I can even add a bunch of other Premiere filters and SG looks and it still stays at full speed at 1/2.
    Ironically, this is quite faster than FCPX which can't seem to play back 5K at all with that filter attached (it doesn't stutter, but it's not smooth... low resolution at "best performace" and reduced frame rate). Even if I remove all filters FCPX plays back Red 4k (again not transcoded) about the same as CC at 1/2, but with a seemingly lower resolution to keep it smooth.  It's a head scratcher. It's like Adobe's Red handling is much better coded than Apple's in this case.
    Or... it has to be attrituable to that particular plugin (other FCPX motion-based plugins don't suffer the same fate and are fast). But either way, filter or no, Premiere Pro CC is definitely and sharper looking at 1/2 when cutting Red 4k/5k with no transcode, playback in real time, than FCPX which needs to bump it down to what looks like a 1/4 or less rez to keep it smooth. So I have no idea what is going on.
    This experience is the opposite with HD, where FCPX is significantly faster (using the same filters/plugin, using C300 Canon XF for HD and 4 and 5K RedRaw alternatively).  Premiere seems slower in HD than FCPX by a good amount in HD and signficantly faster with Redraw 4k. Go figure.

  • Calling a library function node much faster than labview code?

    Hi,  I wrote a labview routine to perform a multiple tau autocorrelation on a large array of integers.  A multi tau autocorrelation is a way to reduce the computation time of the correlation but at the expense of resolution.  You can taylor the multitau correlation to give you good resolution where you need it.  For instance, I require good resolution near the middle (the peak) of the correlation, so I do a linear autocorrelation for the first 64 channels from the peak, then I skip every second channel for the next 32, then skip every 4th channel for 32 more, then skip every 8th for 32 channels... etc.
    Originally, I wrote my own multitau calculation, but it took several hours to perform for just 1024 channels of the correlation of around 2million points of data.  I need to actually do the the correlation on probably 2 billion or more points of data, which would take days.  So then I tried using labview's AutoCorrelation.vi which calls a library function.  It could do a linear autocorrelation with 4 million points in less than a minute.  I figured that writing my code in C and calling it using a call library function node would be faster, but that much faster?
    Finally, I wrote some code that extracts the correlation data points that I would've got from my multitau code from the linear correlation function that I get from the AutoCorrelation.vi.  Clearly this is not optimal, since I spend time calculating all those channels of the correlation function just to throw them away in the end, but I need to do this because the final step of my procedure is to fit the correlation function to a theoretical one.  With say 2million points, the fit would take too long.  The interesting thing here is that simply extracting the 1024 point from the linear autocorrelation function takes a significant amount of time.  Is labview really that slow?
    So, my questions are...  if I rewrite my multitau autocorrelation function in C and call it using a call library function node, will it run that much faster?  Can I achieve the same efficiency if I use a formula node structure?  Why does it take so long just to extract 1024 points from an array?
    I've tried hiding indicators and this speeds things up a little bit, but not very much.
    I'll attach my code if you're interested in taking a look.  There is a switch on the front panel called 'MultiTau'... if in the off position, the code performs the linear autocorrelation with the AutoCorrelation.vi, if in the on position, it performs a multitau autocorrelation using the code I wrote.  Thanks for any help.
    Attachments:
    MultiTauAutocorrelate.vi ‏627 KB

    Hi,
    The C routine that AutoCorrelation.vi is using is probably a higly optimised routine. If you write a routine in LabVIEW, it should be less then 15% slower. But you'd have to know all ins and outs of LabVIEW. How data is handled, when memory is allocated, etc. Also note that the AutoCorrelation.vi has years of engineering behind it, and probably multiple programmers.
    It might even be possible that the c code uses an algorithmic improvement, like the Fast Fourier Transform improves speed on the Fourier Transform. I think the autocorrelation can be done using FFT, but that isn't my thing, so I'm not sure.
    For a fair comparation, posting the code in this forum was a good idea. I'm sure together we can get it to 115% or less of the C variant. (15/115 is just a guess, btw)
    I'm still using LV7.1 for client compatibility, so I'll look at the code later.
    Regards,
    Wiebe.
    "dakeddie" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    Hi,&nbsp; I wrote a labview routine to perform a multiple tau autocorrelation on a large array of integers.&nbsp; A multi tau autocorrelation is a way to reduce the computation time of the correlation but at the expense of resolution.&nbsp; You can taylor the multitau correlation to give you good resolution where you need it.&nbsp; For instance, I require good resolution near the middle (the peak) of the correlation, so I do a linear autocorrelation for the first 64 channels from the peak, then I skip every second channel for the next 32, then skip every 4th channel for 32 more, then skip every 8th for 32 channels... etc. Originally, I wrote my own multitau calculation, but it took several hours to perform for just 1024 channels of the correlation of around 2million points of data.&nbsp; I need to actually do the the correlation on probably 2 billion or more points of data, which would take days.&nbsp; So then I tried using labview's AutoCorrelation.vi which calls a library function.&nbsp; It could do a linear autocorrelation with 4 million points in less than a minute.&nbsp; I figured that writing my code in C and calling it using a call library function node would be faster, but that much faster?Finally, I wrote some code that extracts the correlation data points that I would've got from my multitau code from the linear correlation function that I get from the AutoCorrelation.vi.&nbsp; Clearly this is not optimal, since I spend time calculating all those channels of the correlation function just to throw them away in the end, but I need to do this because the final step of my procedure is to fit the correlation function to a theoretical one.&nbsp; With say 2million points, the fit would take too long.&nbsp; The interesting thing here is that simply extracting the 1024 point from the linear autocorrelation function takes a significant amount of time.&nbsp; Is labview really that slow?So, my questions are...&nbsp; if I rewrite my multitau autocorrelation function in C and call it using a call library function node, will it run that much faster?&nbsp; Can I achieve the same efficiency if I use a formula node structure?&nbsp; Why does it take so long just to extract 1024 points from an array?I've tried hiding indicators and this speeds things up a little bit, but not very much.I'll attach my code if you're interested in taking a look.&nbsp; There is a switch on the front panel called 'MultiTau'... if in the off position, the code performs the linear autocorrelation with the AutoCorrelation.vi, if in the on position, it performs a multitau autocorrelation using the code I wrote.&nbsp; Thanks for any help.
    MultiTauAutocorrelate.vi:
    http://forums.ni.com/attachments/ni/170/185730/1/M​ultiTauAutocorrelate.vi

  • Firefox seems/is faster than Safari but why?

    I always found Safari to be faster than Firefox. Safari 4 compared to Firefox 3.5 seems slower. Some pages take forever to respond in Safari and don't in Firefox. I also think the screen now refreshes faster in Firefox. I've looked at the specs and Safari is supposed to be much faster but I don't seem to be experiencing it as so.
    Although Firefox is nicer for the Mac in its 3.5 iteration, I'm used to Safari having used it since I returned to the Mac in 2003. Also, Firefox doesn't support the same level of services as Safari. In Safari, I'm constantly using services to grab info to SOHO Notes folders.
    Any idea why Safari might be performing like this.

    Greetings,
    The reasons behind your experience could be many, but try this to see if it improves things:
    Quit Safari if it's running and open System Preferences>Network.
    In the DNS Server tab, make sure IPv6 is turned off, and enter these two DNS servers to replace the ones you currently have:
    208.67.222.222
    208.67.220.220
    click Apply Now and quit System Preferences.
    Next, do these things in order:
    1. Go to Home/Library/Cookies and delete the Cookies.plist file.
    2. Go to Home/Library/Caches/com.apple.Safari and delete the contents of that folder.
    3. Go to Home/Library/Caches/com.apple.Safari/Web Page Previews and delete the contents of that folder.
    4. If you don't want to use the Top Sites feature, open Terminal and paste in this command:
    defaults write com.apple.Safari DebugSnapshotsUpdatePolicy -int 2
    5. Go to Home/Library/Caches/Metadata/Safari and delete the contents of that folder.
    6. Go to Home/Library/Caches/Safari and delete the contents of that folder.
    7. Go to Home/Library/Safari and delete these files (if you have them):
    Downloads.plist
    History.plist
    Form Values
    LastSession.plist
    WebpageIcons.db
    Repair Disk Permissions, then restart Safari and see if the speed is improved.

  • I have been a user of Firefox for a long time but it seems to have gotten really slow. IE will open web sites much faster than firefox on all 3 of my computers. Is there something wrong, boged down or do I need to reinstall it?

    It seems that it is taking twice as long for firefox to open the same websites as ie. I run updates but seems to just be taking a long time for it to open sites and I can open with IE in much less time?
    == URL of affected sites ==
    http://

    These issues are usually a result of many extensions. Try [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]]

  • Premiere Pro CS6 still much faster than Premiere Pro CC

    I am currently editing videos that were captured using screen recording software. The files have subsequently been converted to .WMV clips with a data rate of exactly 4.4 MB/sec (that's Megabytes/second). This data rate includes both video and audio.
    There is no problem editing these clips in Premiere Pro CS6. Playback and scrubbing are fine at any quality setting and at any magnification size. Unfortunately, this is not the case with Premier Pro CC2014. This "new" version of Premier Pro chokes to death with attempting to play back or scrub the exact same clips. Even at 1/4 resolution, CC2014 struggles along. I can improve things a bit by turning off CUDA acceleration (which makes even less sense to me), however, CC2014 just can't do what CS6 does.
    I introduced this issue a few months ago, but it obviously has not been resolved by Adobe. They are bringing new feature into CC2014 all the time, but I'd much rather they focus on getting the software to work properly, like CS6 does.

    Totally agree!  C'mon on Adobe...let's fix the performance and the memory leakage!

  • Using trace response time much faster than without tracing

    Oracle 10.2.0.3 64bit for windows 2003
    one very simple statement, "delete from taba where id=**"
    when run it without tracing, took about 2 mins
    when adding 10046 trace, the response time is less than 2 seconds
    repeated this dozens times, all the same problem.
    anyone has this problem before?
    appreciate your input.

    Do you have trigger for DELETE statement on this table ?yes, 4 of them behind it
    Do you have some dependent object like materialized view using this table ?no
    Is this a single instance database or RAC database ?single instance
    Do you have concurrent DML running on this table when runnnig this tests ?no
    below if the tkprof
    TKPROF: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on Thu Jan 6 12:31:57 2011
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
    Trace file: pacs_ora_5800.trc
    Sort options: default
    count    = number of times OCI procedure was executed
    cpu      = cpu time in seconds executing
    elapsed  = elapsed time in seconds executing
    disk     = number of physical reads of buffers from disk
    query    = number of buffers gotten for consistent read
    current  = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)
    rows     = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call
    error connecting to database using: rpt3/rpt3
    ORA-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
    EXPLAIN PLAN option disabled.
    delete TABLEAs
    where
    id=:"SYS_B_0"
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.01          0          3         13           1
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.00       0.01          0          3         13           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Misses in library cache during execute: 1
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36 
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          1  DELETE  TABLEAS (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=706 us)
          1   INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_TABLEA_ID (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=39 us)(object id 23307)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      SQL*Net message to client                       1        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                     1        3.60          3.60
    INSERT INTO TMP_TABLEAS_TRIGGER
    VALUES
    (:B1 )
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          1          7           1
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.00       0.00          0          1          7           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 1)
    SELECT DISTINCT ID
    FROM
    TMP_TABLEAS_TRIGGER
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        2      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           1
    total        4      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          1  HASH UNIQUE (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=158 us)
          1   TABLE ACCESS FULL TMP_TABLEAS_TRIGGER (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=37 us)
    UPDATE TABLEAS SET SUPERCEDES = 0
    WHERE
    ID IN (SELECT ID FROM TABLEAAA WHERE AAID IN(SELECT AAID FROM
      TABLEAAA WHERE ID=:B1 ) ) AND SUPERCEDES=:B1
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.12       0.11          0      50411          2           1
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.12       0.11          0      50411          2           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          0  UPDATE  TABLEAS (cr=50411 pr=0 pw=0 time=117980 us)
          1   NESTED LOOPS  (cr=50411 pr=0 pw=0 time=117906 us)
      16731    VIEW  VW_NSO_1 (cr=217 pr=0 pw=0 time=17208 us)
      16731     SORT UNIQUE (cr=217 pr=0 pw=0 time=17206 us)
      16731      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLEAAA (cr=217 pr=0 pw=0 time=33524 us)
      16733       NESTED LOOPS  (cr=71 pr=0 pw=0 time=58 us)
          1        INDEX RANGE SCAN PK_TABLEA_AA (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=30 us)(object id 23313)
      16731        INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_TABLEAAA_AA_ID (cr=68 pr=0 pw=0 time=44 us)(object id 23316)
          1    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLEAS (cr=50194 pr=0 pw=0 time=90408 us)
      16730     INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_TABLEA_ID (cr=33464 pr=0 pw=0 time=45248 us)(object id 23307)
    UPDATE TABLEAS SET SUPERCEDEDBY = 0
    WHERE
    ID IN (SELECT ID FROM TABLEAAA WHERE AAID IN(SELECT AAID FROM
      TABLEAAA WHERE ID=:B1 ) ) AND SUPERCEDEDBY=:B1
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.10       0.11          0      50411          2           1
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.10       0.11          0      50411          2           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          0  UPDATE  TABLEAS (cr=50411 pr=0 pw=0 time=117770 us)
          1   NESTED LOOPS  (cr=50411 pr=0 pw=0 time=117660 us)
      16731    VIEW  VW_NSO_1 (cr=217 pr=0 pw=0 time=17251 us)
      16731     SORT UNIQUE (cr=217 pr=0 pw=0 time=17250 us)
      16731      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLEAAA (cr=217 pr=0 pw=0 time=33528 us)
      16733       NESTED LOOPS  (cr=71 pr=0 pw=0 time=63 us)
          1        INDEX RANGE SCAN PK_TABLEA_AA (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=38 us)(object id 23313)
      16731        INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_TABLEAAA_AA_ID (cr=68 pr=0 pw=0 time=53 us)(object id 23316)
          1    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLEAS (cr=50194 pr=0 pw=0 time=90462 us)
      16730     INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_TABLEA_ID (cr=33464 pr=0 pw=0 time=45175 us)(object id 23307)
    DELETE FROM TABLEAAA
    WHERE
    ID = :B1
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          3         10           1
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.00       0.00          0          3         10           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          0  DELETE  TABLEAAA (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=626 us)
          1   INDEX RANGE SCAN PK_TABLEA_AA (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=39 us)(object id 23313)
    INSERT INTO TMP_TABLEAAA_RECORDS (AAID, STATUS,TABLEAID)
    VALUES
    (:B3 , :B2 ,:B1 )
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          1          7           1
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.00       0.00          0          1          7           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 2)
    SELECT DISTINCT AAID, STATUS,TABLEAID
    FROM
    TMP_TABLEAAA_RECORDS
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        2      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           1
    total        4      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 2)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          1  HASH UNIQUE (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=162 us)
          1   TABLE ACCESS FULL TMP_TABLEAAA_RECORDS (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=35 us)
    SELECT COUNT(*)
    FROM
    TABLEAAA WHERE AAID = :B1
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1      0.01       0.00          0         68          0           1
    total        3      0.01       0.00          0         68          0           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 2)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          1  SORT AGGREGATE (cr=68 pr=0 pw=0 time=2936 us)
      16730   INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_TABLEAAA_AA_ID (cr=68 pr=0 pw=0 time=8 us)(object id 23316)
    UPDATE TABLEAS SET SUPERCEDES = 0
    WHERE
    ID IN (SELECT ID FROM TABLEAAA WHERE AAID IN(SELECT AAID FROM
      TABLEAAA WHERE AAID=:B2 ) ) AND SUPERCEDES=:B1
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.29       0.29          0     121996          0           0
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.29       0.29          0     121996          0           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 2)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          0  UPDATE  TABLEAS (cr=121996 pr=0 pw=0 time=295237 us)
          0   HASH JOIN SEMI (cr=121996 pr=0 pw=0 time=295234 us)
          0    TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLEAS (cr=121996 pr=0 pw=0 time=295131 us)
          0    VIEW  VW_NSO_1 (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
          0     MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
          0      TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLEAAA (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
          0      BUFFER SORT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
          0       INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_TABLEAAA_AA_ID (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)(object id 23316)
    UPDATE TABLEAS SET SUPERCEDES = 0
    WHERE
    ID=:B1
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           0
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 2)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          0  UPDATE  TABLEAS (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=33 us)
          0   INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_TABLEA_ID (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=30 us)(object id 23307)
    UPDATE TABLEAS SET SUPERCEDEDBY = 0
    WHERE
    ID IN (SELECT ID FROM TABLEAAA WHERE AAID IN(SELECT AAID FROM
      TABLEAAA WHERE AAID=:B2 ) ) AND SUPERCEDEDBY=:B1
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.26       0.29          0     121996          0           0
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.26       0.29          0     121996          0           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 2)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          0  UPDATE  TABLEAS (cr=121996 pr=0 pw=0 time=290701 us)
          0   HASH JOIN SEMI (cr=121996 pr=0 pw=0 time=290697 us)
          0    TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLEAS (cr=121996 pr=0 pw=0 time=290563 us)
          0    VIEW  VW_NSO_1 (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
          0     MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
          0      TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLEAAA (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
          0      BUFFER SORT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
          0       INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_TABLEAAA_AA_ID (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)(object id 23316)
    UPDATE TABLEAS SET SUPERCEDEDBY = 0
    WHERE
    ID=:B1
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           0
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 2)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          0  UPDATE  TABLEAS (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=42 us)
          0   INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_TABLEA_ID (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=40 us)(object id 23307)
    SELECT CLASSIFICATION
    FROM
    TABLEAS WHERE ID=:B1
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           0
    total        2      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 36     (recursive depth: 2)
    rollback
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          2         31           0
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.00       0.00          0          2         31           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Parsing user id: 36 
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      log file sync                                   1        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message to client                       1        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                     1       14.18         14.18
    alter session set events '10046 trace name context off'
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        2      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Parsing user id: 36 
    OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        3      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      3      0.00       0.01          0          5         44           1
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        6      0.00       0.01          0          5         44           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Misses in library cache during execute: 1
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      SQL*Net message to client                       3        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                     3       14.18         24.44
      log file sync                                   1        0.00          0.00
    OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse       12      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute     13      0.79       0.82          0     344825         28           5
    Fetch        6      0.01       0.00          0         77          0           3
    total       31      0.81       0.82          0     344902         28           8
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
       16  user  SQL statements in session.
        0  internal SQL statements in session.
       16  SQL statements in session.
        0  statements EXPLAINed in this session.
    Trace file: pacs_ora_5800.trc
    Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
    Sort options: default
           1  session in tracefile.
          16  user  SQL statements in trace file.
           0  internal SQL statements in trace file.
          16  SQL statements in trace file.
          16  unique SQL statements in trace file.
        1066  lines in trace file.
          18  elapsed seconds in trace file.Edited by: OracleExplorer on Jan 21, 2011 8:40 PM

  • Writing Speed Much Faster than Transcoding Speed

    Hello,
    I'm creating an image for future DVD burning and it is taking quite a while for my 11 minute film to go through this process.  (it's been over 30 minutes so far, and as you can see from the screen shot below, I've got a ways to go!!)
    I've noticed that the "transcoding" seems to be going  lot slower than the "writing", per the screen shot below.
    Is this typical?
    Thanks!  Matt

    Thanks Stan, pretty nice mac pro transcoding from h.264... it looks like i did not have all my little ducks in a perfect row in my original source file.... testing that hypothesis now, it think that is the likely culprit.
    thanks for helping!
    Matt

  • Why is Chromium so much faster than Safari?

    Safari is starting to drag its feet when launching just about any site. Does Chromium have something Safari doesn't?

    HI,
    Empty your Safari cache more often. Command + Option + E
    Why use Google Chrome?
    Carolyn

  • After updating to iOs 6.0.2 my iPad mini battery seems to drain much faster than before :(

    I updated my iPad mini to iOs 6.0.2 a couple of weeks back and I am suffering from battery drain issues.
    Although apple mentioned there, it is supposed to fix wifi issues, I never had any issue with wifi.
    But a black line was appearing when playing youtube videos in safari or chrome, which is fixed in this update.
    But my battery life of the iPad mini is considerably decreased.
    Is apple going to provide another update, which ll fix the battery drain issue?

    I am having the same issue. Hopefully they will have a fix soon.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Question : illustrator CS6 (for PC) in my new iMac ??

    Can I install my illustrator CS6 (for PC) in my new iMac ?

  • FDF in browser without toolbar

    Hi, The following link shows another with a similar problem. http://adobe.groupbrowser.com/t100813.html I apologize if this isn't posted in the right place. I have set the #toolbar=0 parameter in the /F parameter of the FDF document. Eg. /F(http://lo

  • Trying to Compile CVSRenderer.java in Apps Server

    Hi, I wanted to do some changes to CVSRenderer.class in oracle.apps.asf.html. Hence i took the .class file from the server and i decompiled it and did the changes to the .java file and when i wanted to push it back to the server and compile this CVSR

  • PR 1.1 & Social 1.3 update

    Hello, I have an N8 registered on the Orange network in the UK. I have yet to receive OTA updates for Social 1.3 or PR 1.1. Any others on Orange with this situation? Many thanks. Solved! Go to Solution.

  • Total Area Coverage below 200?

    Is there anyway to change the total area coverage to be below 200% in the output preview window? We recently changed newspaper stock and I need to be able to see ink density warnings for 165% or higher. 200% seems to be all that Acrobat allows- Any w