3000 J115 7387 - Current BIOS 2NKT31A doesn't support 4gb RAM

I have a Lenovo 3000 Desktop J115 7387-26u and the current BIOS, just downloaded and tested from Lenovo's "support" site, doesn't support 4gb of RAM properly. I have dual 2gb DIMMs, for a total of 4gb, and both Lenovo's PC-Doctor diagnostics and another memory scanner report to me that I have 4gb. See this screen print showing PC-Doctor's RAM report compared to what Windows "sees".
When I boot the system, the BIOS only reports 3006mb RAM is present. Clearly it's recognizing both DIMMs. I've swapped the DIMMs and the results are the same.
Lenovo, PLEASE RELEASE A BIOS that properly supports what the system claims to support!
Message Edited by GeoApps on 04-06-2009 03:00 PM

dhaj1964 wrote:
just to let you know....32 bits systems....can only read 3gigs of memory....64 bits system can read more .....
Two things. First, "just so you know", the Lenovo 3000 J115 7987 is an Athlon 64 X2 (which you would know if you checked the system specs),and second, I'm talking about the BIOS failing to recognize the RAM that the system specs claim it should be recognizing. This is regardless of OS.

Similar Messages

Unable to install Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit on Lenovo 3000 J115 7387-26U

Hi Everyone,
I am unable to install Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit on my Lenovo desktop. Model : 3000 J115 7387-26U.
When I try to boot my DVD, the systems makes a loud whirring noise.. as if trying to read from DVD, the screen goes blank couple of times and then Windows XP starts up (from my HDD).
I have a Windows 7 32 bit DVD and it successfully started up and I could see the install screen (though I didn't install it. I want to install 64 bit version of the software).
Anyone else seen this problem? Is there some workaround available?
Thanks for your help.
Swam

Hi:
The Intel link you posted doesn't work, so I don't know what you have tried.
See if this works...
Download the drivers from this link below (first file listed -- 64 bit).
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=Y&ProdId=2101&DwnldID=23060&keyword=Intel+Rap...
Extract (copy) the files onto a usb flash drive without any folders.
With the flash drive and W7 installation media plugged into the machine, boot from the W7 installation media.
After you select the install now option, select the Drive Options - Advanced menu, then select the Load Driver option.
You should now see the storage driver files listed.
If you check the box, it will only include the compatible driver.
Follow the prompts and hopefully, W7 will install.

Blue screen after upgrades - 3000 J115 7387-A32

I recently upgraded the graphics card and memory on my Lenovo 3000 J115 7387-A32. After the memory upgrade I noticed that when the computer booted it would 1) go to the blue screen, 2) automatically reboot, 3) boot normally to windows vista.
I upgraded the Graphics Card from an onboard Nvidia 6100 to an Nvidia 8500 GT pci expressI completed this upgrade a couple days prior to the memory upgrade and noticed no issues when booting the computer.
I upgraded from 1 gig (2 x 512 mb) of memory to 4 gigs (2 x 2g) ddr2I did notice that the bios system summary notes the memory as 2.5g while the vista - control panel - system notes 4g, but based on the other posts that seems to be a 32-bit OS limitation and should not be causing the blue screen.
After the computer boots normally, it acknowledges that it did not boot properly and offers to find a solution. It notes that the problem is due to the NVIDIA nforce serial ATA driver (which as far as I can tell is not related to either graphics card?) and takes me to the NVIDIA site. I scan my system for both graphics and motherboard, and the results of both scans are that I have the most up to date drivers available.
I did update my bios through this process.
It does eventually boot up and seems to be working fine, but the blue screen shouldn't occur and I would like to prevent it if I can. I would appreciate any help on this issue.

what are you specs cause i also had some bluie screen errors b4 ( didnt upgrade anything at that point)..and btw i am also looking for an upgrade on a graphics card...i found couple but i have no clue how much my lenovo 7387 can handle (in terms of power supply) can you please help me out here...
Thanks
DjAquarain
AMD Athlon 64 x2 3800+
2gb ram
windows xp
500 gb hd.
Nvidia 6100 (integrated)

K8 T Neo Does Not Support Acpi 2 With Current Bios.. No Chance Of Cool N Quiet

Hi guyz
If you read the Readme that comes with the Athlon64 driver from AMD, let me quote: "This driver supports processor performance control via the processor objects defined in the ACPI 2.0 specification."
Well check ACPI verstion in Sandra, the current BIOS and board only support verstion 1.. no wonder the CPU is not speed stepping as it should with CoolNQuiet.
Any one here ever see there CPU speed step? If so give us all the specs and details.
Hope MSI will fix this, I don't get it.. they have a page http://www.msi.com.tw/html/e_service/techexpress/tech_column/6702/page11.htm where they show how to enable it.
BTW don't try to tell me I have a CPU that doesn't support it cause I do.. checked today, gt an AO ending on the model string and that one supports CoolNQUiet.
Simon
Simon

Good find!
New bios please.

Satellite A100-906 - BIOS see 4GB RAM but OS only 3GB

The [manual|http://eu.computers.toshiba-europe.com/innovation/jsp/SUPPORTSECTION/discontinuedProductPage.do?service=EU&PRODUCT_ID=1 20569&DISC_MODEL=1] says that the laptop supports 4 gigabytes of memory and the BIOS displays them, but the operating system (x86_64) sees only 3 gigabytes.
~$ cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 3093996 kB
~$ uname -a
Linux satellite 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 03:40:32 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
What me do?
Thanks.

> {quote:title=PauPau wrote:}{quote}
> Did you check this using Windows 64bit OS?
No, I do not use Windows.
I tested with different versions of the Linux operating system and Unix (opensolaris, openindiana).
> Fact is that BIOS has recognized the full 4GB RAM. The chipset seems to support the 4GB RAM as well.
Yes, even the technical documentation on the chipset is confirmed, but nevertheless, 1 gigabyte had disappeared. : (

Lenovo 3000 J115 Memory/RAM Problem

Hi everyone. According to the Lenovo website, the Lenovo 3000 J115 machine type 7387 is capable of 4GB of RAM. It has two DIMM slots and supports single or dual channel DDR2 memory. I really wanted to run with 4GB of RAM and it was a deciding factor when I bought the machine.
I purchased two 2GB DDR2 memory sticks, put them in the machine, and the BIOS only shows 2.5GB. The machine runs fine like this, its just not using the memory. There doesnt seem to be anything in the BIOS to help me out with this. I saw some other people had similar issues with other manufacturers machines, but they only needed to enable something called Memory Remapping in the BIOS to fix the problem. There isnt this feature in my BIOS. I installed the latest BIOS hoping that it would help, but it didnt. I also tried a 2GB and a 1GB memory stick just to see what happens and it still shows 2.5GB even with 3GB of RAM installed.
Does anyone know how to get this machine to recognize 4GB of RAM, or even 3GB of RAM. I called support and at first they were trying to tell me it was a problem with Windows XP. Hmmm....I already told them I was running Windows Vista Home Premium. Which wouldnt matter anyway. If the BIOS doesnt see the memory, the OS wouldnt have anything to do with that. So how anyone could think it could be a problem with the OS is beyond me and flat out wrong. After explaining this and getting the team lead on the phone, they sent me out a new motherboard even though I was quite certain that wouldnt fix the problem, which it didnt. And now they are trying to tell me that it wont support 4GB of RAM after they cant think of anything else. The website says it does and that is why I bought the machine and the new memory, both of which I cannot return for a full refund.
Is there anyone else out there that ran into this? Anyone that has more than 2.5GB in their Lenovo 3000 J115? If yes, did you need to do anything special or did it just work.
Message Edited by akz28 on 02-22-2008 04:22 AM
Message Edited by akz28 on 02-22-2008 04:24 AM
Message Edited by akz28 on 02-22-2008 04:25 AM
Message Edited by akz28 on 02-22-2008 04:26 AM

The 3GB vs 4 GB limitation is actually a x86 issue, not operating system. A 32-bit system can only address 32 bits (4,096). There are a number of articles concerning this - Google 3GB vs 4 GB ram. Here is a link: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000811.html
The issue is basically a 32 Bit system can only address 4,096 of memory adressing. However in simple layman terms, the system must address all items on the bus like sound card, video, bios, pci bus, etc. (and the addressing of these items is like using memory).
Anyone familar with the old dos days remembers the software and memory managers we used to move the video, bios, etc above the 1 GB limitation, that way we had 640 KB Memory available for the applications.
Now several years later, we have hit the limit again, the 32-bit architectural now puts the addressing of items above the 3 GB level, leaving the lower 3 GB for memory use. So if 4 MB is installed, the 32-bit system addresses the computer components, then allocates what is left in the addressing range to the memory, thus why some systems with 4 GB do actually get 3.5 GB.
So on systems with 4 GB, with large memory video card and several other addressable items, it is percievable to only be able to use 3 GB. In fact, the recommendation with 32 Bit systems is to install 3 GB memory.
However, I do not know why the system wont recognize the installation in 3 GB mode only (have you installed only 3 GB total and see what it does?) My K100 system has 3 GB ram, (3) 1 GB sticks in 3 of the 4 memory slots. The system does recognize all 3 GB.
In fact, this addresses the reason Lenovo only put 3 GB in my system (I thought 3 GB was weird), because 4 GB would not all be addressed and the additional ram would be a waste of money.
Additional comments from users indicates that applications typically can only use the lower 2 GB anyway, thus leaving the last 1 GB for the OS (Vista). Unless you have applications that can use more Ram, the difficulty in getting the system to address the Ram differently wont gain you much.
And even a 64 Bit OS may not fix the issue, because some chipsets are only 32 Bit, thus addressing the components in the same method, which maybe why your system only see 2.5 GB at the bios level.
How much video memory you have? What do you have the allocation to the video memory set at in the bios?

3000 j115 A11 stopped working after installing new graphics card

I thought i would be slick and install a new graphics card (asus GEForce 8500GT) after i put it in my 3000 j115 A11 everything stopped working. I can turn the tower on and it gives two beeps. Nothing displays on the monitor (it doesn't leave powersaving mode). It is also very quiet like it is not even trying to work. Did I just destroy my computer? Is there anything I can do?
PS. I did take the asus card back out, so I'm not that lucky
PSS. Got back to being able to boot but now I can't get back into bios to switch from PCI back to original built in card. If I try it just hangs after pressing enter to interupt normal setup
Message Edited by Lazlo420 on 06-27-2009 12:05 PM
Note from Moderator: Gave it a more descriptive subject.
Message Edited by JaneL on 06-28-2009 01:36 PM

I find this thread very interesting. I am assuming this system (3000 j115 A11) is the same as one I mentioned in a post from June 12 (7387A11... Graphics upgradeable?).... and is still hanging out there. Perhaps if Lenovo, or anybody else for that matter, could/would provide SPECIFIC upgrade instructions we could all be enlightened. (In my case I do not own a Lenovo computer but I am hoping to help my sister-in-law with her Lenovo and don't look forward to a major meltdown if the systems are not capable of this, otherwise, simple upgrade.)
Niether of the 2 previous posters mentioned if they upgraded the PS in thier respective systems prior to the graphics card installation (although ala17 "recently" did.). One had issues and the other didn't. If that should be the first step toward the upgrade, it would be helpful to know beforehand.
Thanks and good luck. Post back if you get to the bottom of it.

I am trying to hook up my Airport Express to my current network and AirPort Extreme but keep getting the same error message: "This version of AirPort Utility doesn't support this base station. Go to AirPort Service and Support for more information."

I am trying to hook up my Airport Express to my current network and AirPort Extreme but keep getting the same error message: "This version of AirPort Utility doesn’t support this base station. Go to AirPort Service and Support for more information." Any thoughts?

This sounds as if you have an older AirPort Express that is no longer supported by the newer Mavericks operating system.
To check and see if that might be the case, locate the model number on the side of the AirPort Express. It will start with an "A" followed by four numbers. Hard to see in the faint print.....so you may need reading glasses or a magnifying class to see the model number clearly.
Model numbers A1084 and A1088 of the AirPort Express are no longer supported by AirPort Utility in Mavericks.
You will need to use a Mac running Leopard, Snow Leopard, or a PC to be able to administer the older AirPort Express.

HT3775 I am downloading a Final Cut Pro x project directly to Quicktime. The movie will not play, stating Quicktime doesn't support the codec. I currently am using Quicktime 10.1 on my Mac OS X Lion

I am downloading a Final Cut Pro x project directly to Quicktime. The movie will not play stating Quicktime doesn't support the codec. I currently am using Quicktime 10.1 on my Mac OS X Lion

Wow. Okay...
I'll let the real veterans in this forum tackle your issues one after the other. But, I can tell you, all will be well.
My only comment would be re: your computer specs:
BJReis wrote:
. This may be due to somewhat older equipment:
GHz Intel Core Duo MacBook Pro with a 4GB memory computer with Ddr3 running OSX 10.8.4
To be completely honest, FCPX is a RAM hog. It just is. But, RAM is relatively cheap, and the pay-off is good.
4GB is right on the edge, IMHO. 16G is ideal.
I wish you luck, hang in there, and standby for more help.

Brand new iPhone 4, and speakers doesn't work, did restore back to factory settings, not luck, any suggestions. This iPhone was purchased in US, currently in India, will Apple support in India?

Brand new iPhone 4 (unlocked), got it activated yesterday, and speakers doesn't work, did restore back to factory settings, not luck, any suggestions. This iPhone was purchased in US, currently in India, will Apple support in India?

There are many threads on this forum regarding speaker not working issues. You might try searching them. Hopefully you'll find the answer you need.
BTW, the iPhone only has ONE speaker.

UEFI BIOS request - S/N and current BIOS link included

Hi!
Could you provide me an UEFI for my R7950 Twin Frozr 3GD5/OC?
The serial number on the box is: 602-V277-11SB1211041344.
I've hosted a copy of the current BIOS here (on the image - the forum does not allow me to post hyperlinks on this post...
Thanks!

Tecra A10 - BIOS updater doesn't work on Windows 7

Upgrading BIOS for TECRA A10/M10 and Satellite Pro S300/S300M to version v1.90 using P0065v190.exe (bios-20090304141534) fails with message:
"[Error] BIOS Update is not supported OS. Unsupported OS or service pack is installed."
Note: Executing as an Administrator returns the same error.
Probably Windows 7 is not supported but, it must be an explicit protection since the Vista version should work in 7. There's any updater parameter to skip this protection?

BIOS update is designed and tested for certain OS. Win7 is not on the market and at the moment Toshiba offers tested BIOS updated for Vista only.
Sorry but what else to say. You probably know how sensible BIOS update is and how dangerous it can be. So don't play with this and don't make not-tested experiments with this stuff.
In few months Win7 will be on the market and Toshiba will start official support. You can wait few more weeks isnt it?

Lenovo J115 7387 9HU memory upgrade to 4 GB fails

I've been running Linux Etch amd64 with 512 MB stock RAM for a while without any problems. 512 MB is just not enough RAM for what I'm doing, so after upgrading to an additional 2 GB RAM (identical spec'd RAM 5300U-555 667 Mhz) along with the stock 512 MB, my system became randomly unstable with disk corruption and other weirdness such as running apps suddenly exiting. Switching back to the 512 MB solved the problem. Switching to just the 2GB RAM causes the problem to reappear so it's not a combination problem. I tried another 2GB RAM chip with the same results, and I ran an overnight memtest that reported no memory problems. I also checked the HD and it's fine - this is clearly a memory problem.
I checked for a BIOS update and indeed there is one that specifically addresses a 2GB RAM issue, so I installed the BIOS update without any trouble.
After the BIOS update my system no longer has disk corruption problems (that's at least an improvement), but instead it reports "bad page state in process" errors and it will sometimes get a kernel crash.
In addition to the instability problem, if I put in 4 GB RAM (supposedly the maximum supported limit for this machine), the BIOS only displays 3006 MB of RAM, yet the OS (which is 64-bit) does display all 4 GB of RAM and reports that it is making use of the full 4GB of RAM (I load up a whole bunch of things that will take up the full amount before swapping to disk).
I tried 2 x 512 MB RAM giving me 1GB of RAM and it all works perfectly, so it seems that there's still a 2GB memory problem and the BIOS update only improved the situation but did not fully solve it as was claimed.
Well to say the least I'm not at all impressed
The BIOS has no tweaking options to try out, so it looks like I'm stuck unless Lenovo addresses the problem with another BIOS update, but that seems unlikely for this machine.
Does anyone know of a solution to this problem, or should I just trash the MB and buy something else? Any recommendations as to what mobo will fit into the existing case?

An update:
My system seems to be working OK with the 4GB RAM upgrade for a few days now since the BIOS upgrade. The BIOS still does not report the correct amount of RAM, but this does not seem to matter and my OS appears to be making use of all of it. The page errors may have been due to an unrelated problem (software not hardware). If I have any further problems with this machine I'll post in here.

X220 BIOS/Firmware - does it support "Secure Boot" under Windows 8?

I am getting ready to install W8x64 Pro. I have a X220 with the latest BIOS (1.36 if I recall correctly) using Windows 7x64 currently. I have run the Upgrade Assistant and it says: "Secure Boot isn't compatible with your PC." "Your firmware doesn't support Secure Boot so you won't be able to use it in Windows 8."
Assuming when I install W8x64 bit I have "Boot to UEFI First" and "UEFI BIOS Only" set in the BIOS - and the SSD formatted as a GPT SSD - should Secure Boot work?
The 1.36 BIOS is not listed as Windows 8 compatible. I see there is a BIOS for the X230 that is W8 compatible but I am not going to install it.
At any rate - for any of you X220 users - you can click on "System Information" in W8 or type in "msinfo32" in the run script and it will say whether "Secure Boot" is Unsupported or On.
Here is a Lenovo link for installing W7 using UEFI but it does not mention whether you would be able to be in "Secure Mode" at the end.
http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/downloads/detail.page?DocID=HT051844
Kent

Latest firmware is supposed to support Windows 8. But I don't know what support is supposed to mean... I'd say that if you've installed under UEFI and still doesn't enable, it doesn't.
Thou now that I think of... After I installed using UEFI, I had to go back to the BIOS and change some setting. Reset-some-key or something. I can't restart the computer now but whenever I restart it I'll let you know which setting it was. (it can be several days)
Good luck.
If I helped you, please give me some kudos! ^^

Iwlist scanning gives: Interface doesn't support sc [solved]

When I'm trying to scan for all available networks I get:
# iwlist eth1 scanning
eth1 Interface doesn't support scanning : Operation not supported
My wireless card works fine if I set every parameter manually. I'm currently using the orinoco drivers that came along with ArchLinux.
It seems like that the version of the orinoco drivers installed doesn't support the scan stuff. But building the new orinoco drivers failed with
/usr/local/download/orinoco/orinoco-0.15rc2/orinoco_pci.c: In function `orinoco_ pci_suspend':
/usr/local/download/orinoco/orinoco-0.15rc2/orinoco_pci.c:330: error: too many a rguments to function `pci_save_state'
/usr/local/download/orinoco/orinoco-0.15rc2/orinoco_pci.c: In function `orinoco_ pci_resume':
/usr/local/download/orinoco/orinoco-0.15rc2/orinoco_pci.c:347: error: too many a rguments to function `pci_restore_state'
make[2]: *** [/usr/local/download/orinoco/orinoco-0.15rc2/orinoco_pci.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_module_/usr/local/download/orinoco/orinoco-0.15rc2] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.11.3-ARCH'
make: *** [modules] Error 2
So I did try the wlan-ng26 driver downloaded and installed with pacman.
I remove the orinoco modules with
[root@ArchThinkpad orjanp]# modprobe -r orinoco_pci
But when I try to insert the prism2_pci module, it doesn't exist. Why?
[root@ArchThinkpad orjanp]# modprobe prism2_pci
FATAL: Module prism2_pci not found.
Any heads up on what to do?
This is iwconfig before removing the orinoco modules.
[root@ArchThinkpad orjanp]# iwconfig
lo no wireless extensions.
sit0 no wireless extensions.
eth0 no wireless extensions.
eth1 IEEE 802.11-DS ESSID:"" Nickname:"Prism I"
Mode:Managed Access Point: 00:00:00:00:00:00 Bit Rate:11 Mb/s
Tx-Power=15 dBm Sensitivity:1/3
Retry min limit:8 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
Encryption key:off
Power Management:off
Link Quality=0/92 Signal level=-68 dBm Noise level=-122 dBm
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0
This is lspci
[root@ArchThinkpad orjanp]# lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge (rev 04)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 04)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 02)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 02)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 02)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI Bridge (rev 42)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801CAM ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 02)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801CAM IDE U100 (rev 02)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM SMBus (rev 02)
00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Audio (rev 02)
00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Modem (rev 02)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500]
02:00.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1250 PC card Cardbus Controller (rev 01)
02:00.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1250 PC card Cardbus Controller (rev 01)
02:02.0 Network controller: Harris Semiconductor Prism 2.5 Wavelan chipset (rev 01)
02:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82801CAM (ICH3) PRO/100 VE (LOM) Ethernet Controller (rev 42)
This is lsmod before removing orinoco.
[root@ArchThinkpad orjanp]# lsmod
Module Size Used by
radeon 78336 1
ohci_hcd 23048 0
ehci_hcd 36488 0
irtty_sir 7552 0
sir_dev 18636 1 irtty_sir
irda 144184 1 sir_dev
crc_ccitt 2432 1 irda
parport_pc 29252 0
parport 38600 1 parport_pc
rtc 13260 0
pcspkr 4044 0
eepro100 32528 0
orinoco_pci 7552 0
orinoco 44172 1 orinoco_pci
hermes 9472 2 orinoco_pci,orinoco
yenta_socket 23560 0
rsrc_nonstatic 11648 1 yenta_socket
pcmcia_core 51488 2 yenta_socket,rsrc_nonstatic
snd_intel8x0m 19396 0
snd_intel8x0 34624 0
snd_ac97_codec 79224 2 snd_intel8x0m,snd_intel8x0
snd_pcm_oss 56224 0
snd_mixer_oss 21120 1 snd_pcm_oss
snd_pcm 98564 4 snd_intel8x0m,snd_intel8x0,snd_ac97_codec,snd_pcm_oss
snd_timer 27268 1 snd_pcm
snd 59492 7 snd_intel8x0m,snd_intel8x0,snd_ac97_codec,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_timer
soundcore 10848 1 snd
snd_page_alloc 10244 3 snd_intel8x0m,snd_intel8x0,snd_pcm
i2c_i801 8972 0
i2c_core 23296 1 i2c_i801
usbhid 47744 0
uhci_hcd 33424 0
usbcore 125560 5 ohci_hcd,ehci_hcd,usbhid,uhci_hcd
shpchp 100996 0
pci_hotplug 34760 1 shpchp
tsdev 8256 0
joydev 10560 0
evdev 9984 0
cpufreq_powersave 2176 0
cpufreq_userspace 5680 0
p4_clockmod 6164 0
speedstep_lib 4868 1 p4_clockmod
freq_table 5008 1 p4_clockmod
e100 37760 0
mii 5760 2 eepro100,e100
nls_cp437 6144 1
vfat 14976 1
fat 41884 1 vfat

orjanp wrote:
Thanks.
I installed the 0.15RC1 version of the Orinoco drivers found here.
I rebooted but I still had the 0.13 version. I did a make and make install as the readme file said.
What do I have to do to update the driver?
do you use a PKGBUILD?
update the driver: if it was copied to the right place and the kernel knows about it (depmod -a) it should work
for a start, check under
ls -la /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/
that your module is installed under the correct location (the orinoco files should be newer than the other ones)
if this is so, make sure you are depmod -a (as root) ... and if even this is ok, then either you are running the new modules or something strange happened

3000 J115 7387 - Current BIOS 2NKT31A doesn't support 4gb RAM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for