32-bit VST plugins in CS5 - here's a solution

For all people who want to use their old VST plugins in Premiere CS5 but could not use them because they are programmed for 32-bit hosts - here's a solution:
There is a little program called jBridge (jstuff.wordpress.com/jbridge) which works as a bridge for 64-bit hosts and 32-bit plugins. It's simple to use, install it and run the configurator. Here your are guided through the few stepps that have to be done: Choose directory of the 32-bit vst plugins and choose the destination directory (premiere vst directory) that's all. Remember to start the configurator with administrator rights because it have to write files in Premiere-VST directory).
Now I can use my old VST plugins as good and fast as in CS4. jBridge is shareware, you can test it as demo which fully runs for 20 minutes. The full version costs 15 Euro which seems to be a very good investment.
Just an information, hope it will help s.o.
spreeni

Good to know.
Hope that it solves problems for a lot of users.
Hunt

Similar Messages

How to run 32-bit PS plugin on CS5 in 64-bit Mac processor?

Hi...
I have developed an automation plugin for PS CS 3,4 & 5 using CS4 SDK in 32-bit Mac processor. I wanted to have a single build for all the three versions. I am unable to run my plugin on CS3, it loads, but no dialog comes up on clicking the menu item. I have used ADM suites for the dialog. I am unable to spot a solution, please guide me...
Also, another problem with this is that the plugin works for CS5 in 32-bit mode, but the plugin doesn't load when tried with CS5 on 64-bit mode. I made changes in the PiPL, but still no change. I referred the steps mentioned in the documentation for creating a 64-bit plugin, but in the "Step 3: Fix entry point and PiPL", it says that the entry point needs to be changed. But, the entry point mentioned is different from the Automation plugin entry-point. Can you please suggest a way to overcome this problem?
Thanks!

Update on the plugin compatibility with CS3.. It looked like an ADM compatibility issue.. I changed some suites versions.. Now, I am able to display the dialog, but now I have spotted a bigger problem.. that is, that the plugin aborts when it encounters an "sSPBasic->AcquireSuite" statement. I can't see why.. The error code is 1394689636 which points to "S!FD", i.e., Suite not found.. How can this be? Please guide... Its urgent..
Thanks..!

Why wont my .vst plugins work in cs6 on win 7 pro 64 bit

why wont my .vst plugins work on my new os ,win 7 pro 64 bit, i have cs6 and cc installed, they worked fine when it was on xp pro.. even if it finds them and you can bring them up it crashes cs6, any advice is helpful, thanks!!

awb5151 wrote:
But i really want them to work in cs6, i heard you have to use j bridge to use .vst's in cc, is this true..
Yes.
I just dont understand why they wont work in win 7 pro 64 bit , is it an os problem or is it a cs6 problem, when i had cs6 in win xp pro, was it installed as a 32 bit program, if thats the case can i load a 32 bit version of cs6>>>??? thanks!!
It's not the OS - W764Pro can run 32-bit software fine in emulation. Your problem is that there is no 32-bit version of CC. It was widely circulated before release that this was going to be 64-bit only, and that you would need bridging software to run old 32-bit VST plugins.
Apparently, jbridge works fine once you've got it installed and everything in the correct place. I wouldn't know though, because I don't use it - I only use a small number of 64-bit plugins directly. On those few occasions that I want to use a 32-bit plugin, I run it in CS6 Audition (which isn't the CC version, but is 32-bit). So yes, if you have the 32-bit program you can run them in that. Both versions of the software will co-exist quite happily on the same machine, and won't interact at all - except that you have to be careful with your sound device settings.

How to use VST Plugins from Premiere Pro CS5 in Adobe Audition 3.0 ?

I have tried to use VST plugins from Premiere Pro CS5 into Adobe Audition 3.0, but could not use it.Is any method to use them ?

Unless I'm mistaken, you can't do this at all - Adobe lock all their VST effects so that they only work with the app they were intended for. Which also means, of course, that you can't use Audition VST plugins with any other software either. Since Audition isn't currently in the CS, there isn't even an exception there, I suspect.

Using VST plugins and ASIO for everything?

Just a thought. Oh how much I'd like this!
To be able to use universal VST plugins and ASIO for everything directly from Windows would be ideal. To put this simply, making the Creative Windows "mixer" a true equivelent of a pro-software mixing app (Ableton, ProTools, Sonar, Cubase, or any other) in terms of absolute control for all Audio effects and I/O.
If Creative won't ever do this even on their next gen cards, somebody or some company that knows a decent mixer setup should write such a replacement mixer soon offered at a fair price (if not free) that will do so with easy, complete, reliable integration.
Long and specific
VST related:
- Use X-Ram to cache inserted VST plugins. Now theres a potential great reason for it since it obviously doesnt use any to cache the I/O bus like ALL OTHER periphials that have Ram caches. Its use is dictated by software, so why not?
- Allow setting some tiny but likely necessary amount of X-Ram as an additional plugin audio I/O buffer. This should be much less than what mixing software needs for this setting since that would all have to pass the CPU.
- Use Creative's processing hardware directly instead of the CPU so VST plugins won't increase CPU usage (within reason of course).
- Yield overhead when using lots or higher-demand plugins if set in bit-match mode. Why waste all that power for SRC when Voxengo R8Brain or plenty of other pro software can do that a million times better and way faster in non-real-time? OK, only Creative could work this one in.
- Why VST plugins? I'd trust my favorite EQ, digital limiter or whatever that has 64-bit float internal precision and oversampling vs. a 24-bit (rounding-error heaven) with no oversampling like the built in Creative ones.
- If Creative has confidence in the quality of their own propriety effects, doesn't have to be VST but simply making them usable as a ReWire bridged devices into most any host with parameter automation controls and all. Obviosly these could have much lower latency than VST that normally relies on CPU processed software code.
- The only argument against this is that some VST plugins have huge latencies. Optional latency delay to keep tracks
- Allow Creatives hardware to insert as a ReWire slave or otherwise bridged device to ASIO-based apps so VST's can be outsourced from demanding more CPU when mixing. I could also add MIDI plugin effects as well.
ASIO related:
- Allow changing any and all audio I/O routing for individual channels on the fly for Windows and ANY software (not just ASIO compatible stuff). Just like in Ableton, Pro Tools, and every other WELL designed "mixer".
- Treating XP itself and any software that normally goes through DX/MME/etc to use this ASIO mixer by making it appear as an insert send/return in the mixer so it can get routed and processed individually to my liking.
- Can insert send/return signals for any DX/MME/etc program to/from any track or #tracks in any combination up to some reasonable limit with pre/post gains. At least several send/returns slots per channel.
- A game that uses ASIO would be sweet. 0% FPS drop. IMO DX/MME/wave-mapper sound sucks. No control, many wasted CPU cycles, and horrible latency.
- Ability to save/load PROGRAM-specific routing chains. Having it so simly running a certain program will automatically insert it how/whereever I specified, if not default, with all relevant I/O settings, including plugins and related settings that were put in the insert send/return path series to that program of course.
- Put real-time SRC, compression encoding/decoding, or any Creative effects as well whereever I want in the signal chain, whether universal to a track I/O or program insert send/return I/O.
- Ability to record tracks or the master likewise.
- No digital feedback possible caused by monitering/recording/routing configs that would be possible in any decent mixing software. Surely not ever from a default setting or made sometimes impossible to prevent like on the Audigy series. Well unless I do something stupid that SHOULD cause feedback. Speak of a truly worthless mixer, this BTW is the ONLY reason I couldn't just go the manual route and run my host all the time, forcing ALL sounds through it for real-time playback with my Audigy. I'm assuming XiFi's Audio-Creation Mixer doesn't have this horrible problem.
- Imagine putting any combination of sounds in 7.1 surround, monitering specific channels to any physical output, or up/downmixing 5.1 as it plays in real-time, etc. any thing like this possible instantly with a few mouse clicks! This would be SO EASY and completely possible to implement, most of the above right onto existing XiFi's as is.
It's not like it would be competing with pro-interface rackmount products so no harm to Creative. I sure as h*ll wouldn't record with any soundcard's analog pre's or unbalanced connections for that matter. Guess I just love the interface and control of a REAL mixer that can do it all.

cusis wrote:
But would it be possible to somehow use the power of the card to take on some of the load of the cpu, users would surely then see alot more benifits from these cards.
I don't see why this isn't possible with enough X-RAM. Why no host apps support offloading VST plugin cache buffers and rendering threads to it? I'm probly returning my XiFi and sticking with my old Audigy 1 until either I blow it up or Creative makes a REAL upgrade with most the aforementioned features that literally COULD'VE been implemented in XiFi's current hardware.
If they do, they'll have my business and many others I'm pretty sure. Creative, if your listening and you want to like triple your sales - PLEASE get a clue and get the software end right. Microsoft or any audio host software developers, heres your (fat) chance if Creative wont do whats really their responsibility.
If ALL apps were forced to pass through ASIO as I mentioned, this could force all apps and games to use part of X-RAM as an I/O buffer no matter what specific support is. The same way a video card can offload ALL video including Windows, not just when running certain games, or even worse, certain audio apps lol that specifically support video RAM and DX performance controls! That would be the stupidest, most worthless idea and why Video Cards don't waste their hardware this way. And yet this is what XiFi currently does regarding audio. Somebody change this SOON.
This would be SO cheap and easy for Creative toss together and implement and would solve EVERYONE's problems and make ALL games at least get SMOOTH AUDIO. He!! Creative could charge $30 extra for it or just push out a new line of cards and itd still be worth it. Creative, did you read that part? More profit$$$ Like a video card upgrade, I EXPECT a night vs. day improvment but as it stands, XiFi is simply a glorified Audigy that costs more but much LESS likely to work right.
More importantly, its use of ASIO (the real deal) remains no less limited than an old Creative card from way back when. If Creative wants their soundcard to integrate with software better, learn from Nvidia/Ati and deliver the goods as they've done it all along.

After Installing Logic Pro X, my Logic Pro 9's 32-bit AUs don't work. The 32-bit bridge doesn't open and run either in my Logic pro 9. My 32-bit AU plugins are crossed out. Help?

After Installing Logic Pro X, my Logic Pro 9's 32-bit AUs don't work. The 32-bit bridge doesn't open and run either in my Logic pro 9. My 32-bit AU plugins are crossed out. Help?

michaelvee wrote:
As an overworked professional, I simply have to consider the very viable options out there. Never thought I'd be seriously considering a Cubase product.
It's a Steinberg product, not a Cubase product.. in case you haven't been paying attention Steinberg developed the virtual instrument for use in it's programs way back in Cubase 3.55.. the plethora of virtual instruments and the advent of low-latency drivers can be directly traced to Steinberg/Cubase development.. Logic also borrowed Cubase's arrange page format back in the 1980's. Cubase has borrowed from Logic to be sure but Steinberg has long been an innovator for many of the things we take for granted today. It was Logic/Emagic who licensed the VST technology and ASIO low latency format to use in Logic 4.xx. It was Apple who adapted VST to it's own AU format. Also, Cubase and Nuendo have undergone a lot more innovation over the past three years, Yamaha has been good as a parent company. Cubase is not Nuendo's little brother by the way, they are very close, same exact audio engine, same robustness, they can exchange files, the only difference being Cubase doesn't have some of the high end post features that Nuendo has. I use both Cubase and Logic and occasionally Nuendo at the University here.. I know both programs fairly well, believe me, both Cubase 6 and 7 can hold their own with any DAW out there, they just don't come with a bunch of ready made loops and preset instruments.
LogicX will never be able to use 32-bit instruments without a third party solution, nor will it ever include the Bridge. At least according to the people I know.

Is AA3 not compatible with all VST plugins?

Or am i the only one that saves a setting in the master rack (effects rack) and to go re-call it later, a plugin or 2 will be missing from the chain and adobe audition says "One or more of the transforms in this preset could not be opened"
This includes Sonars Sonitus FX (all of them), all of The antress modern plugins and even some Waves plugins, the only ones adobe seems to like are the crappy free vsts and of course all of the adobe plugins. And some of the antress modern plugins will cause aa3 to crash when i try to select them, only certain ones, why is this? does anyone else have problems with vsts and dx fx in aa3? and for the majority to clear things up, most of my plugins load in the rack, but when i save the session and go back to open it the effect is gone (im not sure if this holds true while the track is frozen then i think adobe audition gives an error message like "an error occured while trying to load the plugin xxxxxx"
any ideas?

I've never had the problem - and judging from the stunning lack of replies, nor has anybody else. Doesn't mean it's not real - just that nobody else here recognises it.
I would say though that Audition is a bit picky about VST plugins, and generally only works with ones that have been correctly coded (by no means all of them). The others (and this is generally the free ones) have been known to screw up big time. Last time I heard, Waves plugins worked fine. As for presets not being saved, you have to be a bit careful to make sure that you've saved them in the appropriate place; with a lot of plugins they can store their own, and there's a good chance that Audition won't be having any of that when you reopen the session - you have to store them as a set of values in Audition that it can send to the VST to have any chance of working at all, as far as I'm aware.

CS 5.5 VST plugins

Several 32-bit plugins that worked in AA 3 now show as disabled in CS 5.5. Additionally, CS 5.5 identifies these plugins as 7.1 plugins. They work with stereo tracks and should be enabled under the stereo grouping. Is this a bug, or does CS 5.5 have different requirements for VST plugins?
Thanks,
Steve

Hi Nahravka,
I contacted Voxengo for their response and I was told that they have notified Adobe that Voxengo's multichannel plugins do not work with CS 5.5. While this response might suggest that the issue is related to how Audition has changed, I am not willing to conclude this yet. It would be helpful if some Adobe staff who are viewing this forum can comment and offer advice so that potential purchasers of CS 5.5 can understand what they are getting into. It sounds like you are fine with the latest Waves plugins. Regarding Waves, could you comment about your feelings about specific ones as far as your results with Audition? While I am well aware of Waves, I have been trying to resist buying a dongle just so I could test drive their products.
Regarding Voxengo's plugins, the ones that are not multichannel - that is, they are just "stereo" are said to work. Regarding the multichannel plugins and let's use GlissEQ as an example... from the Effects Rack, it looks like one can invoke the GlissEQ plugin and one can even tweak its settings. However, when one closes the plugin window, the plugin does not show in the Effects Rack.
Having mentioned GlissEQ as an example, it seems like the new Audition EQ could be an improvement over that in AA 3. And this is not to say that the AA 3 parametric EQ is bad. I simply had been using Ozone.
Steve

Adobe Audition CC doesn't recognize VST plugins.

Hello there,
I've been searching and searching through countless blogs and YouTube videos online but I have yet to find an answer to my question. I plan to use VST in the near future and have been downloading a few sample VST plugins. To answer the question I have checked all of them and they are all 64-bit which is how my system is set up, but when adding the folders where my VST files are found; the program scans (and reads them- as the percentage bar loads it displays each files name) but then doesn't display any of the effects. My question is: what is wrong? And if there's anything I can add it would be that, I don't know much about VST but the files are (.dll), is this the right/readable format for Audition?
The VST files are piano effects meant to be utilized with a MIDI device.
Thanks!

Are they actually VST effects. If they are to do with musical instruments and MIDI they could be VSTi (VST Instruments) that Audition doesn't support. Can you tell us the name of one that you have tried unsuccessfully?

CUEAC 9.1.1.10 and CUCM 7.1(5) 64 bit TSP Plugin

Hello,
I have a customer with CUCM 7.1(5) who has purchased CUEAC 9.1.1.10 and wants to run it on Windows Server 2008 R2 (64 bit).
According to the data sheet this should be supported but when I go through the CUEAC server installation process it tries to download the 64 bit TSP plugin from the CUCM server.
This is a problem as CUCM 7.1(5) does not have the 64 bit TSP plugin - it only has the 32 bit version.
The exact message I get is
Error occured while downloading Cisco TSP.
Path: https://10.80.20.12/plugins/CiscoTSPx64.exe
I have obtained the 64 bit TSP from a later CUCM and done a manual installation hoping that the installer would see the TSP is already installed and skip the step but it does not do so.
Can anyone suggest how to resolve this?
I know I could use a 32 bit version of Windows Server or upgrade CUCM but these options are not available.
Thanks

Update
I built a CUCM 9.x server as a virtual machine and integrated CUEAC with that. The 64 bit TSP downloaded and installed ok and I was hoping that I could then reconfigure the TSP CTI manager addresses and the CUEAC CUCM server to point to the version 7.1 CUCM server.
Unfortunately this did not work as I got a message complaining about version incompatibilities between the CUEAC server and CUCM.
I do not think there is any workaround for running CUCM 7.1 with CUEAC on a 64 bit Windows Server.
Luckily for me the customer found an old Windows 2003 32 bit server that they used to run Cisco ACS on. CUEAC installed without a hitch on this server and is running fine.
If anyone manages to get this working I would be interested to know how.
Lesson here is do not believe Cisco data sheets

Porting of CS4 Plugin into CS5 on Mac 10.6

Hello All,
I am new to Photoshop and I am trying to Port the CS4 Plugin into CS5. On Mac OS 10.5 it gets compiled properly without any major changes but the menus does not load into Photoshop menus. On Mac OS 10.6 I am facing the proplem comiling the code itself.
Can any one help me on this. What wrong I am doing or have I missed anything. I also tried to compare my code with Outboud Sample project. There is no major difference. Still why is it not getting loaded?
Thank you all in advance.
Regards
Farzana.

What platform are you compiling to and what platform is your machine?
Check your .r file and your PiPL resource and your configuration.
Are the the CS5 SDK projects working when you run them on Photoshop CS5?
You should have something like this in your PiPL resource.
#ifdef __PIMac__
          #if (defined(__i386__))
                    CodeMacIntel32 { "PluginMain" },
                    /* If your plugin uses Objective-C, Cocoa, for UI it should not be
                       unloaded, this flag is valid for 32 bit plug-ins only and
                 should not be used in any windows section */
                    // off for now as this plug-in has no Objective-C Cocoa {},
          #endif
          #if (defined(__x86_64__))
                    CodeMacIntel64 { "PluginMain" },
          #endif
#else
          #if defined(_WIN64)
                    CodeWin64X86 { "PluginMain" },
          #else
                    CodeWin32X86 { "PluginMain" },
          #endif
#endif

VST Audio for CS5 SDK question

I have a couple of old audio plug-ins that ran on CS4. I just recompiled my old VST library for 64 bit and built my plug-ins. Everything went okay, but CS5 does not see them. Is there a new VST library for CS5 or should I be doing something else?
Thanks,
Gee

Hi,
Can you post the .cpp file that Zac made for you?
It’s kinda hard to help you if I can’t work out what sort of callback you were trying to make.
Btw,
Based on your original post...
>In the examples you gave me years ago, I made following declaration:
>AEffect *main (audioMasterCallback audioMaster) { ...
>}
>In CS4 it complained so I made the following change:
>int *main (audioMasterCallback audioMaster) { ...
>}
>
...I just grep'ed for the "audioMasterCallback" in all CS3|4|5 SDKs for AE and Premiere and it's not there.
I'm wondering how you compiled at all when there is no definition for it in the headers?
D:\My Downloads\Adobe\SDK>dir /ad
Volume in drive D is MEDIA
Volume Serial Number is E20D-79C1
Directory of D:\My Downloads\Adobe\SDK
09/10/2010 07:34 AM
09/10/2010 07:34 AM
01/24/2010 04:52 PM
Adobe After Effects CS3 SDK
09/10/2010 07:34 AM
Adobe After Effects CS4 SDK
09/10/2010 07:34 AM
Adobe After Effects CS5 Win SDK
01/24/2010 04:52 PM
Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 r1 SDK
09/10/2010 07:31 AM
Premiere Pro CS4 r1 SDK Win
09/10/2010 07:32 AM
Premiere Pro CS5 Win SDK
0 File(s) 0 bytes
8 Dir(s) 125,591,977,984 bytes free
D:\My Downloads\Adobe\SDK>
grep audioMasterCallback . -rn
D:\My Downloads\Adobe\SDK

Optional Plugins for CS5

Has anyone successfully installed the optional plugins in CS5 running in 64bit under Snow Leopard 10.6.3?

Hi,
It's best to check directly with Epson, but I think Canon is one of the few so far that have posted 64 bit drivers for their scanners.
See this post for a bit more info:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/2888087#2888087
You might get an answer from PDFerguson on how to tell if the driver is 32 bit or 64 bit compatible.
regards,
steve

Is there a way to install just the 32 bit version of Photoshop CS5 on a Windows 7 64 bit machine?

I have a custom built Java 6 application that doesn't like Photoshop CS5 64 bit edition. The program copies over a file from the network to the local machine and then opens it in Photoshop. The user manipulates the image and saves the changes. The user then completes the image and the application copies the image back to the server. The problem we're having is: When we use Photoshop CS5 64-bit, it takes about 2 minutes for Photoshop to open the image. The file is copied over within 2 seconds and the Photoshop icon on the windows taskbar starts flashing. But then you spend a few minutes waiting for it to open.
Some things that I have tried to isolate the problem:
- I found you can copy the file somewhere else, double click on it and the image will open in Photoshop before the script is able to open the file.
- I tried uninstalling Photoshop and reinstalling just the 64 bit edition without the 32 bit installation. The script just stops working in this situation.
- I tried uninstalling CS5 and installing CS3. The image opens as soon as the file is copied over.
What I would like to try next is to install just the CS5 32 bit version. But the installer is being uncooperative and will only allow either the 64 bit version or both the 64 and 32 bit versions. So, back to my question: Is there a way to install just the 32 bit version of Photoshop CS5 on a Windows 7 64 bit machine?

Do you mean schroot? If so I'm not sure exactly how well that will work out, because the part that depends on python is a deamon that handles communication between the USB dongle and the Tux Droid which may mean hacking the deamon a bit so ether way this does not seem like it will be a easy task.

Using XMP Lib in a plugin for CS5.0 Windows

Hello
I have been able to compile the XMP-Toolkit-SDK-5.1.2 and use it successfully in a plugin for CS5.0 Mac OS X.
Im now trying to do the same on windows, but with no luck. Im using MS Visual C++ 2008 express edition.
There seems to be a conflict between the XML library and msvcprt.lib library. If I try to exclude the msvcprt.lib library I get only one error.
If I try to exclude the msvcprt.lib i get the following problem:
1>PlugInStatics1.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "__declspec(dllimport) public: __thiscall std::locale::id::id(unsigned int)" (__imp_??0id@locale@std@@QAE@I@Z)
I get the following linker problems:
1>XMPCoreStaticRelease.lib(WXMPMeta.obj) : MSIL .netmodule or module compiled with /GL found; restarting link with /LTCG; add /LTCG to the link command line to improve linker performance
1>msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll) : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >(class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > const &)" (??0?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QAE@ABV01@@Z) already defined in XMPCoreStaticRelease.lib(XMPCore_Impl.obj)
1>msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll) : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >(void)" (??1?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QAE@XZ) already defined in XMPCoreStaticRelease.lib(WXMPMeta.obj)
1>msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll) : error LNK2005: "public: char const * __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::c_str(void)const " (?c_str@?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QBEPBDXZ) already defined in XMPCoreStaticRelease.lib(WXMPMeta.obj)
1>msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll) : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >(char const *)" (??0?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QAE@PBD@Z) already defined in XMPCoreStaticRelease.lib(XMPCore_Impl.obj)
1>msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll) : error LNK2005: "public: unsigned int __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::size(void)const " (?size@?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QBEIXZ) already defined in XMPCoreStaticRelease.lib(WXMPMeta.obj)
1>msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll) : error LNK2005: "public: void __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::push_back(char)" (?push_back@?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QAEXD@Z) already defined in XMPCoreStaticRelease.lib(XMPUtils.obj)
1>msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll) : error LNK2005: "public: class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > & __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::assign(char const *,unsigned int)" (?assign@?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QAEAAV12@PBDI@Z) already defined in XMPCoreStaticRelease.lib(XMPCore_Impl.obj)
1>msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll) : error LNK2005: "public: char const * __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::data(void)const " (?data@?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QBEPBDXZ) already defined in XMPFilesStaticRelease.lib(P2_Handler.obj)
1>msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll) : error LNK2005: "public: class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > & __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::operator=(class std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> > const &)" (??4?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QAEAAV01@ABV01@@Z) already defined in XMPCoreStaticRelease.lib(XMPCore_Impl.obj)
1>msvcprt.lib(MSVCP90.dll) : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall std::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >::basic_string<char,struct std::char_traits<char>,class std::allocator<char> >(void)" (??0?$basic_string@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@QAE@XZ) already defined in XMPCoreStaticRelease.lib(WXMPMeta.obj)
Best Regards
/ Pontus Hulin

Hi Pontus.
You're probably mixing static libraries with shared.
Regards
Bartek

32-bit VST plugins in CS5 - here's a solution

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for