340 bridge traffic between two non root bridges

I have a deployent with a 340 series bridge acting as root bridge and two 340 bridges acting as non-root remotes. The hosts hanging off the non-root bridges can communicate with the hosts hanging off the root bridge but i cannot get communication to work between hosts on the two non-root bridges. Is there some sort of split horizon type setting I need to configure on the root-bridge to allow traffic back out the radio interface.

There isn't anything in the bridges that would block traffic between the two sites. Is this one large subnet, or are there two subnets? If there are two, how are you routing between the two?
Can one non-root bridge ping the other non-root?

Similar Messages

  • 1310 Root with two non-root bridges

    I have a Cisco 1310 root bridge and a 1310 non-root bridge . it worked fine for a year, I then installed one more 1310 as a non-root bridge now I?m seeing both of my non-root bridges dropping offline more and more. I checked my first non-root bridge today and the radio is down and I can?t seem to bring it back up. I have recently upgraded the tar to see if that would fix the problem. This problem started when I added my second non-root bridge. Did I miss some setting or something

    Make sure the spanning tree protocol is disabled on Vlan interfaces

  • 7920 associates to root bridge but not to non-root bridge

    I have 7920s using open authentication with WEP128 cipher. I have two 1300 root AP's (with client support) and three non-root AP's (also client support) in the same lab area. The root AP's and non-Root AP's associate and link to each other no problem. However, the 7920's will only associate with the Root APs. If I power down the root APs, the 7920s show "no AP found". I've verified SSID and WEP128 keys. I've also noted that the root AP does have a channel specified under dot11radio0 but the non-roots do not. Do the 7920's just scan for any channel until it finds an association or do I need to specify a channel in the non-root bridges?
    Thanks,
    Mike.

    With static WEP, the authentication is happening at the AP level. Will want to ensure non-root is associated to a root though otherwise the interface may be in "reset" state.
    The 7920 will look at these 2 as individual APs regardless of channel. Non-roots should have the same channel as the root, otherwise will not be able to communicate.

  • Non-root bridge 1242AG with root 340 bridge series

    I have a configuration with a root bridge 340 series and about 5 non-root bridge 340 series. I want to add a 1242 non root bridge, but the new device can't see the others, and neither the others can see the 1242.
    Is there an issue in connecting these two devices in this configuration?

    Hi, first, thanks for the help.
    Second, this incompatibility is only valid
    for RFC1042 or it is valid for 802.11g?
    Third, If I configure my 1242 as Acess Point, and the 340 series as Client or Brigde_only, they should not talk too?
    Sorry for the bad english...

  • Can one Root Bridge support multiple non-root bridges?

    Hey gang,
    I have a pretty simple question here I think
    I have a wireless bridge currently setup to support a separate office building on our property about 200 yards away from the main building.  The wireless bridge has been working great and was a much cheaper solution when compared to the cost of making a fiber drop to this building.  The needs of our business have changed (go figure), to include a warehouse building also on the backside of the property.  It's not feasible to run a cable between these two building either.  So I need to create another wireless bridge to this back warehouse as well.  My question is can I just use another non-root bridge to link to the root bridge already in place, or does each wireless bridge require one root bridge and one non-root bridge?
    I have good LoS to both buildings from where the current root bridge is, so if two non-root bridges can talk to one root bridge I should be able to just an additional non-root bridge and be good to go.  But if wireless bridges are meant to be a one to one setup, then I'll need to setup an additional root bridge to link to the new non-root bridge?
    It seems like you should be able to have one root bridge link to multiple non-root bridges but I haven't been able to find any clear examples of this being done.
    Thanks in advance for the help!

    That was just too easy.
    I copied the configuration from the working non-root bridge to my laptop.  I changed out the ip address of the BVI interface.  I uploaded the configuration to the new 1300 bridge.  I plugged it in and pointed the yagi antenna in the general direction of the original root bridge and started pinging the new 1300.  Success!
    I'll use my spare 1300 to get service up and running in the warehouse by the end of the week and I'll just need to order one more 1300 to make sure I have spare on hand if needed.
    Thanks again!

  • Wireless Root Bridge - Non Root Bridge

    I've been reading a lot about bridge configuration for wireless AP but i cannot make it work the following scenario:
    PC -- ethernet port --> Non-Root-Bridge -----------> Root Bridge ---------> Switch
    vlan111                     native 18 - vlan111           native 18 - vlan111      vlan native 18,111
    Its pinging fine between switch and Non-Root. But when i put vlan111 on Non-Root the two AP's stop responding to the network.
    What am i doing wrong? Plz i need some help!! I have two 1242.
    ------------------------ Root Config ----------------------
    dot11 syslog
    dot11 vlan-name JGS111 vlan 111
    dot11 vlan-name JGS18 vlan 18
    dot11 ssid WGB
       vlan 18
       authentication open
       guest-mode
       infrastructure-ssid
    username Cisco password 7 047802150C2E
    bridge irb
    interface Dot11Radio0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    ssid WGB
    station-role root bridge
    infrastructure-client
    interface Dot11Radio0.18
    encapsulation dot1Q 18 native
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface Dot11Radio0.111
    encapsulation dot1Q 111
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 111
    bridge-group 111 spanning-disabled
    interface Dot11Radio1
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    shutdown
    dfs band 3 block
    channel dfs
    station-role root
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    interface FastEthernet0.18
    encapsulation dot1Q 18 native
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0.111
    encapsulation dot1Q 111
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 111
    bridge-group 111 spanning-disabled
    interface BVI1
    ip address 10.1.8.50 255.255.255.0
    no ip route-cache
    ip default-gateway 10.1.8.254
    ip http server
    no ip http secure-server
    ip http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
    bridge 1 route ip
    ------------- Non-Root-Bridge -------------
    ot11 syslog
    dot11 vlan-name JGS111 vlan 111
    dot11 vlan-name JGS18 vlan 18
    dot11 ssid WGB
       vlan 18
       authentication open
       guest-mode
       infrastructure-ssid
    username Cisco password 7 14341B180F0B
    bridge irb
    interface Dot11Radio0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    ssid WGB
    station-role non-root bridge
    infrastructure-client
    interface Dot11Radio0.18
    encapsulation dot1Q 18 native
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface Dot11Radio0.111
    encapsulation dot1Q 111
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 111
    bridge-group 111 spanning-disabled
    interface Dot11Radio1
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    shutdown
    dfs band 3 block
    channel dfs
    station-role root
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    interface FastEthernet0.18
    encapsulation dot1Q 18 native
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0.111
    encapsulation dot1Q 111
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 111
    bridge-group 111 spanning-disabled
    interface BVI1
    ip address 10.1.8.51 255.255.255.0
    no ip route-cache
    ip default-gateway 10.1.8.254
    ip http server
    no ip http secure-server
    ip http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
    bridge 1 route ip

    Try this:
    interface Dot11Radio0.18
    encapsulation dot1Q 18 native
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface Dot11Radio0.111
    encapsulation dot1Q 111
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 111
    bridge-group 111 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 111 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 111 source-learning
    no bridge-group 111 unicast-flooding
    bridge-group 111 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0.18
    encapsulation dot1Q 10 native
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 1
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0.111
    encapsulation dot1Q 111
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 111
    no bridge-group 111 source-learning
    bridge-group 111 spanning-disabled
    Make sure your switchort is setup similar
    interface GigabitEthernet0/7
    description 1242 AP Bridge
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport trunk native vlan 18
    switchport trunk allowed vlans 18,111
    switchport mode trunk
    Thanks,
    Scott
    Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"

  • Root Bridge+Clients with Non-Root Bridge+Clients Howto?

    Hi, i have two 1242AG access points. I would like to setup a bridge between the two to bridge ethernet lan segments, furthermore i would like to be able to connect wireless clients to either of the access points so i can get maximum range.
    I did what i thought was correct, created the first access point a 'root bridge with wireless clients', and assigned the ssid.
    I set the second access point to 'non-root bridge with wireless clients' amd set the same ssid as the first access point.
    I cant even get the root bridge to work, i turn it on, it brings the radio interface up but i cannot connect with my wireless clients, infact i cannot even see the SSID!
    Do i need to 'Set Single Guest Mode SSID' for the radios? What does that command do?
    Any ideas? A link to config example would be much apreciated.
    Thanks,
    Chris

    Hi, first, thanks for the help.
    Second, this incompatibility is only valid
    for RFC1042 or it is valid for 802.11g?
    Third, If I configure my 1242 as Acess Point, and the 340 series as Client or Brigde_only, they should not talk too?
    Sorry for the bad english...

  • N bridge between two 1252an in bridge mode at 5GHz

    I've read in some of the cisco documentation on the 1250 series that root bridge or non root bridge modes are "not tested". They don't say "not supported". I have a client that could use a high bandwidth link between two buildings that are 100' or so apart. The fiber link has already been busted twice. Heavy heavy trucks kill the ground concrete. I have configed a 54Mbps solution with two 1242G's and some cisco yagi's. But, if an N bridge is possible with two 1252AG's, and go faster than the 54Mbps..I'd go with that setup.
    Cisco documentation says the bridge modes show up in the 1252 webgui and are selectable. They just end it with "not tested".
    Any thoughts?

    It became supported in recent versions of the 1250 IOS.
    |With this feature, the Cisco Aironet 1140 and 1250 Series can be configured for both access point and bridge functions. Bridging support on 802.11n access points offers added performance, reliability and throughput for basic wireless LAN coverage, wireless LAN coverage with wireless backhaul, and more traditional bridging applications.|
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps6087/product_bulletin_c25-560118_ps6973_Products_Bulletin.html
    Nicolas
    ===
    Don't forget to rate answers that you find useful

  • Network Design - Root and Non root bridges

    Hi,
    We have a network set-up as the below image. Where the switches have STP enable to handle the muliple paths for the data to flow.
    What I would like to know is should the 2 bridges plugged into the same switch e.g Switch A (Bridge A and Bridge B) both be root bridges and (Bridge C and Bridge D) both be non root.
    Or should for example, Bridge A be a root and Bridge C a non root and Bridge B a non root and Bridge D the root?
    Similarly with the rest of the other bridges E, F, G and H
    Thanks

    Disclaimer
    The  Author of this posting offers the information contained within this  posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that  there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.  Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not  be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In  no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,  without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out  of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author  has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    Ah, I think I understand.  So the wireless bridges are "transparent" to the rest of the network.  They just convert wired to wireless and back again.
    If I have that right, we can ignore them and just consider your switches.
    In that case, it appears you have two L2 loops, those formed by the dual paths between switches A and B and between switches C and D.  From a topology standpoint, it doesn't seem to matter what switch you select as root and secondary root.  However, as switches B and C are the interior switches, I would suggest those as your root and secondary root switches.

  • 1310 Root Bridge will not Authenticate with 350 Non Root Bridge

    I've exhausted myself solving this issue.
    I have a 1310 set as a root bridge using WEPS. I have a 350 set as a non root bridge/without clients, also using WEPS (they both use the same SSID)
    The 350 will not authenticate to the 1310. After doing a Carrier Busy Test, it is clear the 350 see's the 1310 with signal strengh of 100 percent.
    (I have a test lab setup in my office)
    If I make the 350 the Root Bridge and the 1310 the Non Root, The 1310 will authenticate to the 350.
    I hoping someone else has seen this problem and can enlighten me.
    Thank you.

    I have successfully configured a 1310 Bridge as a Root Bridge and a BR350 Bridge and a Non Root Bridge/with Clients. I also had to force the 1310 to operate at 11MB only.
    As soon as I make the BR350 Bridge a Non Root Bridge/without Clients, the authentication is dropped between the two.
    I was hoping I could transition to the 1310 one unit at a time since I have over a dozen 350's to replace.

  • SAP 1602 Wireless bridge issue. Non root bridge loses it's configuration

    Hi guys,
    Today I tried to configure wireless link between two autonomous AP 1602 APs.
    There is a problem with Non-root bridge. I configured it with this command:
    AP2(config-if)#station-role non-root wireless-clients
    Non-root bridge successfully joins the root bridge (root AP). Anyway, this configuration does not work, if I reload my non-root bridge. Even without reload, If I check my non-root bridge configuration it looks like this:
    interface Dot11Radio1
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    encryption vlan 1 mode ciphers aes-ccm
    ssid WiFi-Bridge
    antenna gain 0
    stbc
    beamform ofdm
    Command "station-role non-root wireless-clients" is missing here. But I just configured it few seconds ago... Does anyone know, where could be a problem?

    Okay... Everything works with OPEN ssid. Not with my WPA 2 configuration.
    On both APs configuration looks like this:
    dot11 ssid Private
       vlan 10
       authentication open
       authentication key-management wpa version 2
       guest-mode
       wpa-psk ascii 7 01100F175804575D72
    interface Dot11Radio0
    encryption vlan 10 mode ciphers aes-ccm
    ssid Private
    infrastructure-client ( on Root AP)
    station-role root bridge wireless-clients ( on Root AP)
    Few debugs:
    *Mar  2 09:57:30.554: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station  9c02.986d.9675 Reassociated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2 PSK]
    *Mar  2 09:57:30.938: dot11_auth_client_abort: Received abort request for client 9c02.986d.9675
    *Mar  2 09:57:30.938: dot11_auth_client_abort: No client entry to abort: 9c02.986d.9675 for application 0x1
    *Mar  2 09:57:30.938: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station 9c02.986d.9675 Reason: Sending station has left the BSS
    *Mar  2 09:57:30.986: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station  9c02.986d.9675 Reassociated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2 PSK]
    *Mar  2 09:57:31.350: dot11_auth_client_abort: Received abort request for client 9c02.986d.9675
    *Mar  2 09:57:31.350: dot11_auth_client_abort: No client entry to abort: 9c02.986d.9675 for application 0x1
    *Mar  2 09:57:31.350: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station 9c02.986d.9675 Reason: Sending station has left the BSS
    *Mar  2 09:57:31.398: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station  9c02.986d.9675 Reassociated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2 PSK]
    *Mar  2 09:57:31.766: dot11_auth_client_abort: Received abort request for client 9c02.986d.9675
    Everything works with android device and WPA2 if I change configuration to this:
    dot11 ssid Private
       vlan 10
       authentication open
       authentication key-management wpa version 2
       mbssid guest-mode
       wpa-psk ascii 7 01100F175804575D72
    interface Dot11Radio0
    encryption vlan 10 mode ciphers aes-ccm
    ssid Private
    station-role root
    mbssid

  • 1300 Root-Bridge and Non-Root Bridge setup

    I have two 1300s that I am trying to set up as Root Bridge and Non-Root Bridge, however, everytime i specify one of them as a Non-Root bridge, the radio0 interface becomes disabled. The only option that i am able to pick that enables the radio0 interface is "Access Point", which is what am trying to avoid it being.
    Can anybody help me figure out how to go about this

    A non-root's radio will show as disabled if it cannot find the root AP to associate to. Make sure you have "infrastructure-ssid" configured under the SSID on both the root and non-root bridges. Also depending on code versions you may have to configure the distance command under the radio interface on the root.

  • 1230AG non-root bridge not associating

    Hello everyone,
    I am new at setting up root and non-root bridges. I am trying to set-up three 1230ag devices.
    One as the root and the othe two as non-root, I copied the config txt from the root and
    copied that into the two I am going to use for the non-root. That way the ssid's are the
    same. When I set the role to non-root the radio is not enabled and I get a message saying
    Interface Dot11Radio0,cannot associate:No Response
    Does any know what I am doing wrong, and how to fix it
    Thanks

    The radio interface will go down in response to being configured as a non-root bridge, so that much is working.  But there must be a configuration error if it won't associate.  Can you post the configs so we can review them?
    Are the bridges mounted, or are they on your desk?

  • Non-root bridges associating with each other.

    We have a point to multi-point bridge setup with 3 BR1310s. One is set to be a root bridge and the other two are set to be non-root bridges. From past experience (not to mention Cisco documentation) I would expect the 2 non-roots to associate to the root. What is happening is that one of the non-roots associates with the root and the other non-root associates with the first non-root. The good bit is that everything still works, the puzzling bit is why this is happening, the bridges are physically in a V pattern so there's no reason for the second non-root to behave as it is, even if we force it off the first non-root it just jumps right back in there again. Bridges are all running 12.3.4-JA.

    Configurations of both non-root bridges attached. I've just found out that the customer has mounted the second non-root bridge in such a way that there is probably no line of site to the root bridge (failing to follow clear instructions!) which explains why we can't get it to associate with the root bridge but doesn't explain how it can associate with the other non-root. The only thing I can think of is that both are "non-root with clients" and the second bridge is being accepted as a client rather than a bridge.

  • Aironet 1262N - Access Point behind Non-Root Bridge possible?

    Hi,
    I want to connect two buildings. Let's call them Building A (main) and Building B.
    „A“ is the main building and provides a wired LAN to an AAA server (192.168.1.2) and the WAN gateway (192.168.1.1).
    There I placed a 1262N with the IP 192.168.1.3 connected to the wired LAN and configured it as Root-Bridge. Let's call it AP01.
    „B“ is a pretty large building and has a wired LAN from one end to the other end.
    So I placed two 1262N there, each at one end.
    The first 1262N is configured as non-root Bridge (AP02) and connects to the Root Bridge (AP01).
    The IP address of AP02 is 192.168.1.4.
    The second 1262N is configured as Access Point (AP03) and connects to the non-root Bridge (AP02) via the wired LAN.
    The IP adress of AP03 is 192.168.1.5
    My Questions:
    1. Do I need tell AP02 about the AAA Server in Building A or acts AP01 like a AAA Proxy for AP02 because of it Root Bridge functionality?
    2. How Do I tell AP03 that it should use AP02 as a gateway to building A?
    I attached a diagram.

    Hello  Mr. Vogl,
    Thank you for your question.
    However, the Small Business Support Community is limited to Cisco Small Business Products, and the Aironet products are considered as a Enterprise level devices.
    I recommend you to post this question on the on the correct forum, in order to get a better response.
    You can move your post using the Actions panel on the right.
    Best regards,
    Diego Rodriguez
    Cisco Small Business Community Engineer

Maybe you are looking for