350 Bridge thinks it is a 340

I upgraded my 350 series Wireless Bridges to 12.03T, one of them is working fine, the other says:
**PCMCIA Card in Socket 0 is not recognized
**Failed to load driver for device entry #2
when it boots up and the wireless interface is not showing up under Network ports or the setup page. Also in the bottom left area it says "Cisco BR340 12.03T" instead of "Cisco 350 Series 12.03T" like my other one. unfortunately I dont have a service contract on it, so I am hoping it is easy to troubleshoot.

Can anybody help?

Similar Messages

350 bridge

I've got got 1500's deployed with a controller. What I need is bridge set-up over at a construction sight with a camera. I have a left over 350 bridge and repeater. So far I have not been able to get them to attach to the 1500. They will attach to a 1200 with noproblem.
I've entered the Mc in the controller, in same sub-net, and checked the encryption.
Looked around for info on this, but time is short as always.

Hi Thomas,
I think that you are running into the following;
Q. Are the Cisco Aironet 1500 Series Mesh APs interoperable with other Cisco Aironet APs? What are the Cisco devices that are compatible with mesh APs?
A. No. The Cisco Aironet 1500 Series is Lightweight Access Point Protocol (LWAPP)-based and does not interoperate with Cisco IOS Software-based Cisco Aironet Wireless Bridges or APs that exist. However, it does interoperate with all LWAPP-based APs and WLAN controllers.
From this good Q&A doc;
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/products_qanda_item09186a0080094d01.shtml#aps
Q. Is the Cisco Aironet 1500 Series compatible with the Cisco Aironet 1400 Series and Cisco Aironet 1300 Series?
A. The Cisco Aironet 1500 Series is LWAPP-based and will not interoperate with autonomous Cisco Aironet wireless bridges or access points such as the Cisco Aironet 1400 Series and the Cisco Aironet 1300 Series in autonomous mode. In addition, it will not bridge to the Cisco Aironet 1300 Series in lightweight mode because in lightweight mode, the Cisco Aironet 1300 Series operates only as an access point (and not a bridge). The Cisco Aironet 1500 Series will, however, co-exist in the same WLAN as a Cisco Aironet 1300 Series in lightweight mode (for example, within the same wireless LAN controller or across multiple controllers within the same mobility group), allowing a wireless client to roam seamlessly between the Cisco Aironet 1500 Series and 1300 Series Access Points.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6548/products_qanda_item0900aecd80364a30.shtml
Hope this helps!
Rob
Please remember to rate helpful posts.....

Associate 350 Bridge with 1242 acting as Bridge

Is it possible for a 350 Bridge configured as a non root bridge to associate with a Cisco 1242 acting as a root bridge?

FYI.. 350 ans 340 series are EOS/ EOL
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps458/prod_end-of-life_notice0900aecd805fee16.html
is 350 running VXvorks or IOS?? I guess we can, hvnt tried though.. if it runs.. then 350 bridges works on 11 mbps...b radio...so for it to work with 1240...1240 needs to set basic rate to 11 mbps that is b radio..
lemme know if this answered your question..
Regards
Surendra
====
Please dont forget to rate the posts which answered your question and mark it as answered or was helpfull

Aironet 350 Bridge associations

Hi,
I have 2 aironet 350 bridges that keep disassociating and then reassociating constantly. Is there any way to stop this form happening?

Parent is "Root Bridge", end station is "Non-root bridge w/out clients." Thanks for pointing me to the Express setup page--that's the one I had in mind, but I haven't been there since day one. Now I need to figure out why, with those settings, it's allowing client connections...
The only MAC address filtering I see is (per documentation) "allow or disallow the forwarding of unicast or multicast packets either sent from or addressed to specific MAC addresses." When I look at the actual Address Filters page, it only allows me to specify "Dest Address." Not much help if I don't want to allow other connections *to* the bridge...
When I'm not in Express Setup, and go to the Setup page, I have the option at the bottom of the page (Network Ports | Bridge Radio or Network Ports | Root Radio) to go to an Advanced page. While there, I see a field called "Radio Cell role." The Root Radio Advanced page shows the Radio Cell role as "Access Point / Root." The other options would be "Client/Non-root" and "Repeater/non-root." The Bridge Radio Advanced page shows the role as "client/non-root." I am *assuming* that the Root radio here, although called an "access point" is not an access point for clients (i.e., its role is that of the access point for the far end(s) of the bridge).
I can't find anyplace to stop broadcasting the SSID...
Thanks for the help!
t

Cpu load on 350 bridge

Hi,
any idea to monitor the cpu load on a 350 bridge? (snmp, telnet, ..)
Regards
Alex

The following URL may give you a better idea,
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wireless/airo_350/350brdgs/brscg/br350ch2.htm#1015862

350 Bridges VOIP Setup

Can someone tell me if this setup will work and give priority to Voice?
Building A
350 Bridge
3550 Switch
Building B
350 Bridge
2924 Switch
I will want to prioritize voice over the link between the 2 buildings. The customer will be using an Avaya IP phone switch. There are only about 10 users in building B. If I configure VLANS and QOS on the bridges and the 3550 switch, will this solution work? Thanks

Take a look t the following document tht talks about configuring QoS for Voice on 350 devices, my be this will give you a better idea.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps458/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008007f770.html#26726

350 Bridge WEP Security

I have a 350 Bridge to Bridge configuration.
Root Bridge & Non-Root Bridge W/O Clients
I want the communication between these (2)
bridges to be secure.
How do I configure WEP?

Here is where I would suggest starting
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wireless/airo_350/350brdgs/brscg/index.htm for wireless bridge configurations
to set up wep look under security setup section
best of luck It should be pretty straight forward
PS
make sure you have bridge's set to root without clients and non-root without clients if only using wep in a point to point

Bridge think photoshop is busy with a task - CS6/Window 7

Bridge keeps telling me that photoshop is busy with a task and asks if a wish to queue the request. Photoshop is not busy. I can go to photoshop and open and close items, run batch process, ect. I even tried closing and opening Photoshop. Bridge still thinks photoshop is busy.
Any suggestions.

Just updated to Mavericks and running CS6. Thoughts anyone?
First try this link because it solved problems with Mavericks before:
http://helpx.adobe.com/bridge/kb/acr-84-bridge-cs6-metadata.html
Can you specify the action you have selected that is causing the busy message?

Aironet 350 Bridge

Can you configure Bridge to work in a full duplex mode?

... or gang 2 or 3 350s together and load balance.
each one will still be half-duplex, but the potential for 2 or 3 to be tied up transmitting without receiving at the same time will be reduced.
Plus the aggregate pipe is 22 or 33Mbps nominal.

Monitoring Aironet 350 Bridge Link Signal Strength

Hello,
Does anyone have ideas/examples on using SNMP to query 350 series bridges to obtain running data on signal strength & quality? I would like to use something like MRTG to monitor signal strength, along with link usage.
Looking through the MIB files (especially ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/AWCVX-MIB.my)
it looks like awcDot11TpFdbLatestRxSignalStrength is what I'm after, however I cannot see how to properly reference this. When I walk the tree from 1.3.6.1.4.1.522.3.12 it doesn't seem to list the relevant values.
Any help/advice most appreciated!
Thanks,
Ben Trigger

PS - when I walk the tree i get the following:
snmpwalk -c public 172.16.0.2 1.3.6.1.4.1.522.3.12
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.1.0 = INTEGER: 10
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.3.0 = INTEGER: 2
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.5.0 = INTEGER: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.7.0 = INTEGER: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.8.0 = INTEGER: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.9.0 = INTEGER: 1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.10.0 = INTEGER: 1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.11.0 = INTEGER: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.12.0 = INTEGER: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.13.0 = INTEGER: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.14.0 = INTEGER: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.15.0 = INTEGER: 1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.1.16.0 = INTEGER: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.1.0 = INTEGER: 8192
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.2.0 = Gauge32: 300
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.3.0 = Gauge32: 28800
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.4.0 = Gauge32: 1800
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.5.0 = Gauge32: 1800
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.6.0 = Gauge32: 1800
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.7.0 = Gauge32: 28800
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.8.0 = Gauge32: 28800
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.9.0 = Gauge32: 28800
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.10.0 = Gauge32: 28800
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.11.0 = INTEGER: 1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.12.0 = INTEGER: 2
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.13.0 = INTEGER: 30
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.522.3.12.2.14.0 = INTEGER: 2

350 Bridge vs 1200 AP

We have a simple setup of one 350 connected to another 350 at a remote site. We then replaced the 350s with 1200 aps. Data works fine over the access points, but the voice (7940s) wont work at all. In reading some of the other posts, it seems that you have to configure the voice vlan on the AP and associate it with the SSID. What I dont understand is that the 350s had no form on VLAN configuration at all so why would the 1200 AP need VLAN configuration?
If the AP do need VLAN configuration, do you then create two SSIDs, one for data (one VLAN) and then another for voice (voice vlan). Then do you associate each SSID with that VLAN? If this is correct, then how will the computers know to use the data VLAN?
I then read on another way where you put the data on the native vlan and then the voice on one vlan. You still have to associate the native vlan with a SSID and then the voice vlan with another SSID though, correct? Again, why do you have to do all this on the 1200 APs and not the 350s?

When you need to segment your network into data and voice n/w you have to create one SSID for each network and use VLANs. One SSID can be associated only with one VLAN.

Bridge 350 root and no root security ?

Hi,
i have 2 point to point bridge 350,
and only wep is active,
i know how to make radius with AP 1100 and client (pcmcia)
I want to know how i can secure my point to point connection. root --> no root
Is possible to set root on radius serveur and to set the no root for authentification on the root ?
Please help me.....

Dear Sir
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wireless/airo_350/350brdgs/brscg/br350ch8.htm#1053765
Above url shows how to configure bridge link for leap .
I hope this helps .
On Non root you can enter username and password which will be authenitcated by ACS on on root side
On 350 bridge runs vxworks so we do not have radius
build in .
Regards

Upgrading Older 340 Access Points

I have 7 AP in my organization, one is a Aironet 4800, one is a Cisco 350, and the rest are Cisco 340s. I'm a bit puzzled because the outside of each 340 is the same, basically. But the OS is different, 3 of them show as Aironet BR500E V8.24 and the other two show as Cisco AP340 11.23T. I'm getting both of these numbers from the top left of the browser when I access them from IP address. I'm imaging the BR500E is the older Aironet OS where as the AP340 is the new Cisco one. Well my question is this, can I change the BR500Es to be the same as the Cisco AP340s through a firmware upgrade or some other means? I'm wanting to setup Cisco ACS product so I can use LEAP and Dynamic WEP. But I don't think these BR500Es will work with Cisco LEAP, or will it??
Thanks

Unfortunately you do not have 7 AP's. The ones that have BR500E are actual wireless bridges. These bridges are going to have the basic same shape as the AP's but they are a little bit bigger in size. If you look on top of these devices you should see the label stating that it is a bridge and if you flip the device over, you should see the tag with the serial number and part number under it that says AIR-BR340, AIR-BR341, or AIR-BR342There is no way to upgrade them to an Access Point or to the 11.23T code. These bridges do not do Leap.

Need help on Aironet 1300 bridges

Greeting,
We have just upgraded two Aironet 1300 bridges (from cisco 350) on two buildings about 100 yards apart. They are only running as bridges. One is set up as root bridge and another one is setup as non-root bridge. Root bridge is in the main building direct connect to Cat 4506. For some reason the root bridge has some intermittant problem connect to the network. We are running the IOS 12.3(8). We changed the cable but the problem still occured. Everytime we have to reboot the root bridge in order to get it back. but all the interfaces in the root bridge show " up / up" prior to reload. The "show tech" looks fine on the root bridge. Any suggestion? Shall I change root bridge to workgroup bridge?
really appreciate for any helps,
Gene

Hi Steprodr,
I just need to clearify that the power injector is on the non-root bridge? I think the power are fine on both bridges when the problem occured. We used cisco 350 bridges before the upgrade. So the cable and port are still remain the same. The problem is more going towards from root bridge come back to Cat 4506 because both root and non root bridges can ping each other when the problem occured.
thanks,
Gene

Bridging with C350 series & C1200 series

Hello all,
I have a Cisco 350 series bridge that is currently the Root for 4 other bridges. 2 of which are 350series and 2 which are 1200series.
Within the past 2 weeks I added in the 2nd 1200 bridge on to this particular network.
Over the past 2 days I have noticed that the 350 Root has been having trouble remaining authenticated with the other 2 350 bridges.
My two questions are:
1. What is the maximum number of bridges that may be associated with a 350 series bridge configured as a root?
2.Would the addition of the 2nd 1200series bridge cause something like what I have been experiencing?
Please note that the 1st 1200 series bridge implemented has been running for the past year or so with no problems whatsoever.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated as this bridges are used to connect buildings with a large number of users.....so this is pretty urgent.
Thank you.

1. Does wireless work similar to half duplex?
Yes.
2. If there is more than one client bridged to the root then is the bandwidth eg 11Mbps shared amongst along the bridged clients? eg. 2Mbps each on full duplex?
Yes.
Think of a wireless link as a hub, shared media, shared bandwidth, etc.

350 Bridge thinks it is a 340

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for