3Dmark scores please post

Please Post 3dmark2001/2003 scores if you have them.  Im trying to get a sence of where the rig im working on places.
K8V deluxe
Athlon 64 (3200+) 2Ghz
2@512meg Mushkin black high perf 2-2-2
ATI 9800Pro 256meg
Antec 550TP PSU
Antec Sonata case
As of now the rig is running 3Dmark2001 at 19,577
And 5,832 in 3Dmark2003
In my opinion the rig is not running what it should be.  I know its not A MSI board but they wanted an asus board for some strange reason    I just need some info on the 64s performance by users not reviews, thanks

No I didn't have dynamic overclocking on. Will re-run the test with it enabled.
Update: Ok, just re-ran on my home PC with dynamic overclocking enabled.
Result was a slight improvement of 6480. Test breakdown
Game Tests
 GT1  Wings of Fury         : 213.4 fps
 GT2  Battle of Proxycon  : 45.6 fps
 GT3 Trolls Lair               : 38.8 fps
 GT4 Mother Nature         :36.5 fps
CPU Tests
 Test 1 : 82.7fps
 Test 2 : 10.9 fps
Feature Tests
 Fill Rate Single   : 1846.2 Mtexels
 Fill rate Multi      : 2850.1 Mtexels
 Vertex Shader   : 20.0 fps
 Pixel Shader 2.0: 52.8 fps
 RagTroll            : 29.0
Sound Tests
 No sounds  : 51.0 fps
 24 sounds  : 39.6 fps
 60 sounds  : N/A
Out of interest I also ran it on my work pc, whose specs are
P4 800FSB  2.8Ghz
ASUS P4P800 m/b
1Gb Ram
ATI 9600 (catalyst 3.9)
WinXP Pro SP1
On Board Sound codec
3DMark03 (build 340) : 3315
Game Tests
 GT1  Wings of Fury         : 128.5fps
 GT2  Battle of Proxycon  : 20.5.fps
 GT3 Trolls Lair               : 18.8 fps
 GT4 Mother Nature         :19.5 fps
CPU Tests
 Test 1 : 60.9fps
 Test 2 : 10.6 fps
Feature Tests
 Fill Rate Single   : 855.0 Mtexels
 Fill rate Multi      : 1528.9 Mtexels
 Vertex Shader   : 10.4 fps
 Pixel Shader 2.0: 29.0 fps
Sound Tests
 No sounds  : 55.6 fps
 24 sounds  : 47.2fps
 60 sounds  : N/A
I'm surpised the score dropped that much considering the rest of the h/w is comparable with my home unit. Whats also interesting is that the sound test on my work machine have better scores than my home PC. I suppose this shows that the audio codec on the P4P800 is better than the Realtek on the K8T NEO, or the drivers are better. A bit surprising all the same.
Craig

Similar Messages

  • 3dMark05 Score - please post

    Post your 3dMark05 score in this tread and please include your computer spesifications!

    Quote
    Originally posted by cool'n'quiet
    Grommit,
    You still haven't even remotely explained why the 9600XT should score far better than the 5950U
    Correct.  Instead, I pointed out some supporting evidence for 3dmarks "accuracy".
    I posted the shadermark results to point out the relative performance of a 9800XT vs a 5950U - and how it corresponds to performance under 3dmark05.  Shadermark shows the 9800XT with 70% better performance than a 5950U - which matches the gap in 3dmark05.  Therefore it's reasonable to assume that the 9600XT's 3dmark05 score is in  line with what's being tested.
    Quote
    but if the benchmark doesn't reflect any game, what point is the benchmark?
    Right - I know of no available game that runs 70% faster on a 9800XT than a 5950U.    However, I'm sure you can read futuremarks marketing claims without needing me to reiterate them.
    IMO, the free edition is good for making sure your system setup performs in line with similar setups.  As a synthetic benchmark, the Pro version looks very useful for reviewers trying to identify strengths and weaknesses of cards.
    I do find it amusing that despite your own reservations, you went to the trouble of trying it under three different driver revisions  
    BTW, the shader model discussion was meant to illustrate why ATI and Nvidia cards should NOT be compared using 3dmark05.  And for your reference, I suggest you check out the 3dmark white paper.
    [edit] Here are some 9600XT shadermark results to chew on.

  • 3dMark Scores

    Right then - lets get this one started
    3dmark scores please for system benching comparisons?
    Mine is as follows:
    No ocing at all:
      24281 - 3dMark 2001SE
      11299 - 3dMark 2003 - Build 340
      4027 - 3dMark 2005 - Ver1
      62,746 - Aquamark
      4,873 -  PCMark04
    with ONLY my GT graphics card clocked to Ultra speeds (which it has been since day one) - for those that dont know - 350/1Ghz to 400/1.1Ghz ;>
    25780 - 3dmark2001SE
    12,668 -3dmark2003 - Build 340
    5085   - 3dmark2005 - Ver 1.1.0
    67,527 - Aquamark
    4915 - PCMark04

    Quote
    Originally posted by OafyC
    Quote
    Originally posted by RexB
    Quote
    Originally posted by phrozin
    shouldent this be over at benchmarks ? oh well
    a64 3500+ neo2 x800pro
    3d 01 29560
    3d 01 14089
    aqua 3 75k
    a64 3500+a8v x800pro
    3d 01 30532
    3d 03 14490
    aqua 03 77231
    doom 3 1024x768  88.7
    a64 3200+ 1 mb neo 1 x800pro
    3d 01 29700
    3d 03 13780
    aqua 3 72k
    a64 3400+ 1mb neo1 x800pro
    3d 01 29570
    3d 03 13349
    aqua 3 71k
    Holy Shmoly phrozin! You running a NOS in those rigs?
    Those score are a bit high.  About what I get on my comparable 3400 system if I force null ps 1.x
    How so?? all you haft to do is flash with xt bios to open 16 pipes then flash it back then volt mod it easy null px shader lol don’t thinks so! all scores are with fm approved drivers and whql
    03
    01
    aqua
    stock card o/c system runs 26500 01  13089 03
    I finally get my fx 53 and vapour chill next week so im looking for mid 16k in 03 1 interesting point is the difference between k8n neo 2 and the asus both were running same clocks and same mem timings (I though at least 1 of you would have picked that up instead of craping on about null shader aint thats a nv thing anyhow) some what disappointing i had high hopes for the neo2
    The same old story I cant do so it's impossible  instead of asking how!

  • 3DMark Scores!! (Post Yours!)

    I decided to make a thread for all the MSI forum users, to post their 3dmark scores!! Also once enough people have posted, I can make a list of who is leading in 2 categories, of AMD and Intel cpus.  
    3dmark01=16800
    3dmark03=5445
    (At 400mhz for my ram, it wont remember the fps in 3dmark01 )
    (PS. Can we move this to the "Anything Under the Sun" forum. I meant to post there)

    Here is a thread i started about 3dmark scores in 64bit forum and Here hope this helps in your testing the last link was when i was trying to see what ATI drivers didn't like K7N2 but is obsolete now.

  • Suggestions please low 3dmark scores & neo2

    Hi everyone.
    I just did a system build w/ specs in signature.  Bios ver 1.4.  Bios is running at stock speed, mem @ 2-2-2-10 1t.  agp aperature=128.  Fast writes=disabled.
    I installed winxp w/ slipstream sp2, then mobo drivers including gart driver then nforce driver 67.02.
    My 3d mark score averages 3843.  I was getting at least 5100 with same setup except with my via 939 boards (soltek and asus a8v).
    I have network installed and am using the nvidia ethernet.  Do you think I should use this or the real tek driver.  Might this be holding back my performance?
    Please help with suggestions to improve my performace.  I am at my wits end!  I've done numerous searches and cannot find anything to help me!
    thanks.

    Set the AGP Aperture to 256, you have that much ram on the video card, I have the exact same card and I get 3dmark scores of about 5500...
     And try the beta 70.90 drivers out, they work very well.
    http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=925
     Also, make sure Vertical Sync is set to Application Controlled, you may have it turned on right now, which is rather bad for benchmarking.
    Good luck

  • My 3dmark scores are a joke need advice please

    Hello, well I cant understand why my 3dmark scores are so bad, 6494.
    my pc
    MSI KT3 Ultra
    512 Corsair cas2 PC 2700
    80 gig barra 7200 (OS running on it)
    40 gig barra 7200
    30 gig WD    7200
    Win XP Pro
    Leadtek GF4 4200 64meg
    I have configured my bios according to the settings guide on http://www.amdforums.com/showindex.php?s=&threadid=124482
    Hard drive have also been defragged
    I have also used River Tuner and have changed my settings from default to Core clock 279 Memory clock 567 that gave me an increase of around 400 points. But its still not what I had expected. what would be a safe limit to reach ?
    I have the FSB set to 148x10.5
    I would have thought my scores would have been around the 10,000 mark.
    Anyone have any ideas as to why the score is so low or any ideas on how to improve performance.
    I am so dam disapointed, it seems no matter what i try with this board it doesnt work.

    hey Grandad,
    try closing/disable PC Alert 4 AND Cooler XP,
    and don't forget the programs running at the background, such like anti-virus programs (McAfee/Norton). Those services must not running while benchmarking.
    TIP: the time of benchmark is also important.
    After starting WinXP/system your processor is cold.
    And a much better cooling is very recommended.
    10 degrees celcius colder means 1000 points more.
    ATTENTION: Don't adjust the PCI reserved megabites (for DirectX/OpenGL) at the display (drivers) properties.
    I did that once, i had a lack of 40 fps at every benchmark test.
    i hope this is usefull for you.
    Thats why i got 10025 points with my GF4 Ti 4200 XP  )

  • 2011 iMac Boot Camp 3DMark Scores

    So I got my new iMac a few days ago with intent of running Boot Camp for gaming in Windows 7, and all day to day computer operations in OSX. I am slightly disappointed in its performance so far when running games like Crysis 2 at higher settings. Some of this may improve with driver updates but according to AMD driver updates when using boot campy have to come from Apple, so GPU driver updates may be few and far between.
    I was interested in seeing what everyone else running the new 2011 iMac's are getting in 3DMark06 and 11 when using boot camp.
    Computer:
    2011 27" iMac
    3.4 Ghz i7
    8GB Ram
    AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2GB GDDR5
    Scores:
    3DMARK06 - 20915
    Width: 1280
    Height: 1024
    Anti-Aliasing: None
    Texture Filtering: Optimal
    VS Profile: 3_0
    PS Profile: 3_0
    3DMARK11 - 3139
    Used basic edition, only option that comes with trial version
    Screen Height720
    Msaa Sample Count1
    Texture Filtering ModeTrilinear
    Max Af Anisotropy1
    Tessellation Detail5
    All 3DMARK tests were run using the free trial version so all the settings were default. You can get 3DMARK06 and 11 from the link below.
    http://www.3dmark.com
    - Just click on benchmark in upper right and corner and you can select which one you want to download the trial to.
    If anyone else has run these tests, or would like to, please post your scores here! Don't forget to include what hardware your running on your computer.
    Thanks

    The Hatter,
    Which driver are you talking about specifically? Are you talking about the Catalyst Software Suit here:
    http://sites.amd.com/us/game/downloads/Pages/radeon_win7-64.aspx
    I have downloaded multiple drivers from AMD saying they are for the AMD Radeon HD 6970m but they each either don't apply at all or say that no compatible hardware was found? When i called AMD they told me that any support and driver updates for graphic cards used in Apple computers would have to come from apple? Have you had success from drivers downloaded from the AMD website?

  • Horrible 3dmark scores...

    K7N2 Delta Board with latest BIOS
    2 Sticks 512MB Muskin PC2700 Ram "black series" running 1:1 ratio on a 133mhz FSB speed (clocked down to get into windows)
    80gb seagate 7200 rpm drive
    GeForce 4200 TI 128mb ram with 52.16 driver
    3.63 Network Driver
    3.66 nforce IDE
    3.34 AGP controller
    AMD 2800+ Athlon thingie with a volcano cooler running at 1.6ghz so i can write this post
    Windows 2000 SP 4 with Directx 9.0b
    Antec 380W power supply
    1 CDRom
    I downloaded the futuremark 3dmark program to test my system as its been doing sad pathetic things and I'm trying things to make it work better.  I got the new mushkin ram and running at 133MHZ FSB I can actually do things, at 166mhz fsb the system goes to crap and keeps resetting.
    I ran the 3dmark and got 91fps first test then 5, 8 and 2 frames/sec afterwards for a final 3dmark score of ..../sigh ... 882.
    I gotta think my video cards shot cause during game play I keep getting whole screens of garbage, loose game textures and I keep getting STOP 0x1E in the nv4_.dll when i blue screen.
    Are these boards this damm bad or do I simply have a bum one?

    try reinstalling the thingie,s cooler as the rest of your hardware looks ok to me
    be sure its not on backwards,be sure its not sitting on the high top part of the socket
    clean and new fresh grease

  • FX5900 Very Low 3DMARK Score

    With the system below, I get a 3DMARK3 (Build 340) score of 4540 (53.03 drivers) at standard clocks (400/850), which seems to be rather low.  At the highest stable OC (425/925), I get 4791. Any tips, suggestions or comments? Thanks in advance.
    System:
    Intel P4 2.8C 800FSB, HT
    ASUS P4P800 Deluxe UAY
    OCZ 2X512MB PC3200 Dual Channel EL Platinum
    MSI FX5900 VTD128 VIVO
    Detailed Results (at 400/850):
    3DMark Score: 4540 3DMarks
    GT1 - Wings of Fury: 161.8 FPS
    GT2 - Battle of Proxycon: 33.3 FPS
    GT3 - Troll's Lair: 27.1 FPS
    GT4 - Mother Nature: 22.1 FPS
    CPU Score: 568 CPUMarks
    CPU Test 1: 59.6 FPS
    CPU Test 2: 10.7 FPS
    Fill Rate (Single-Texturing): 1365.1 MTexels/s
    Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing): 2835.3 MTexels/s
    Vertex Shader: 11.7 FPS
    Pixel Shader 2.0: 43.0 FPS
    Ragtroll: 15.9 FPS
    No sounds: 50.2 FPS
    24 sounds: 40.8 FPS
    60 sounds: Not supported

    Quote
    Originally posted by The Black Wibble
    I'd be interested to know the 3DMark2003 score when there are fewer programs running in the background.  Use msconfig to disable all the programs under the startup tab except NvCpl and rundll32 nvclock.  Assuming you are running XP try to disable as many *non* microsoft services as you feel safe doing.  Reboot into that environment and redo the benchmark.
    Also, do you know for sure that your pc3200 memory is running at full speed (ie. 400MHz) and is not using some other fsb:mem ratio of 4:3 or 5:4?
    The given score is with every non-essential background process and service diasbled (though it makes very little difference). DRAM is running at 1:1 (ie 400). Tried 5:4 with FSB=230 (max stable at stock voltage). Gains a little (CPU), loses a little (RAM), doesn't make much difference in the end. IOW, everything is running at specs now.
    Also, (to ToxicTaz) it's not a SP.
    I noticed a peculiar thing, though. When I ran Aida and checked video mem speed, it reported, as "actual speed", some odd number quite a bit lower than 850 (something like 736). This is in 2D mode of course (but memory speed should be the same). Anyway, now I cannot duplicate it. Could it be that the memory is stepping down on its own accord? GPU, yes, but I didn't think memory could do that. GPU doesn't get too hot either (~48 deg right after 3dmark3). Is there a way I can check "actual" memory speed during 3D testing, if there is even such a thing?
    Mind you I can OC memory upto 930 OC and it passes nVidia test and seems to be running fine at that. But if it's lowering down behind my back, that would explain it.

  • Higher 3dmark scores threw overclocking on kt4 ultra

    OK i just bought a 2100xp based on the assumption that id overclock it ....the first problem i noticed was my power supply wasent strong enough. so i swaped it out with my other computer and i got the fsb up to 133. When i let fussy logic test out overclocking i come up 139. now my 3dmark scores sould be a little higher like maybe 13600. but i cant even get close withouy that extra 6 mhz on the fsb. So after reading threw posts i heard that if you set it to 166mhz a new driver enguages for the 333 fsb processors but when i do it just like all the other posts i get no post....so i was wondering if it could be  a voltage problem much like from 100 to 133 like alot of people are having or if my processor is stoping it. but i thought the lock was just for the multiplyer and ive been told to lower that to acheve higher fsb speeds. I havent thought of over clocking my radion yet...... and have read that the xps pretty much can hit 2.2 or even 2.1. so im really confused why i cant up my bus....i mean in the end if i unlock my cpu amd i going to raise the mulitpler so i can leave the bus at 139 (cause its stable) or if there was another way. im lookin for a 14500 3dmark score and ill be happy and i didnt want to spend the money on the unlocking kit so really i was looking for other options. when i got the motherboard i was pretty mad about all the so called problems but i got them cleared up and now am looking to see what i can do with it thanks in advance for all the help you guys are great

    your not getting 166 with that cpu without unlocking it
    so you can reduce the multiplier

  • Low 3dMark Scores

    The 3d mark scores thread has me thinking.  
    My post from that thread:
    I'm not really a big benchie, but all of this has me thinking. All-in-all, this machine is not much faster than my 2800= nforce2 setup, in fact my 3dMark03 & 01se scores are much lower. With my 2800 I was getting 17250 in 01se & 6250 in 03, now with the setup below I'm getting 5243 in 03 & 15874 in 01se. Even turning the quality down has little impact on the score. One big difference in the a64's favor is I can run 'lock-on' at much faster framerates with AA & AF turned all the way up. The Vid card and extra HDD came from my old box which was about 6 months old.
    My AGP apature is set @ 128mb, my mem timings are below and my CPU is not OC'd, but my GPU is; it's set to 432/371, but not all of the time. I'm running cat 4.1 drivers. So whats the deal, any guesses?
    Like I said I'm not all that concerned with my 3dMark scores as I am that I may be missing something that is causing my computer to take a performance hit.

    Ok, I managed to get mine fixed. I now get a cpu score of 628. This is with normal windows applications (virus killer, etc) running in the background. Will I tell you how I did it or will I keep you in suspense    jk.
    Ok, I did 2 things at once so I am not sure which fixed it.
    1. Removed my 1G pc2700 memory and put in 512Mb DDR400 generic memory.
    2. Switch off cool n quiet in the bios.
    I suspect it's the cool n quiet but havent turned it back on again yet to check.
    Hope this works for you (hope you havent started installing fresh windows yet).
    Edit.. On a side note since you asked about via drivers. I have them all installed except IDE. I find via IDE drivers to be TERRIBLE. This is my first via board in a long time. I used to have via boards (over 5 years ago) and I had the same problem then. Whenever you put the VIA ide driver in the system goes to Sh*t. The drives become noisy and the performance is poor. My advice is to stick with the microsoft ones - a million times better.
    skooby

  • HP LaserJet 1022 Printing Problems - Please Post Here

    Sorry, I hate to create a new thread, but tracking so many different threads on this one issue is becoming problematic for me. So with that being said, if you are still having a problem with printing to a LaserJet 1022 after the full uninstall I detailed in the FAQ thread followed by installing version 2.2 of the HP driver package, then let me know here. And specifically I want to know is which device you have, how your device is connected, the print driver version, and what apps are giving you problems. In my own personal testing, here is what I have found:
    USB direct connect - OK, I have yet to run into a problem here.
    USB connected to an Airport Extreme N - OK, I have yet to run into a problem here.
    USB connected to an Airport Express G - Paused problem. I got print job/page out and then the printer paused and would not resume. I don't have a functioning work around here yet, but I'm trying.
    So if I were going to fill out my own form, it would look like this:
    Printer: LaserJet 1022n
    Connection: USB connected to an Airport Express G (Firmware version 6.3)
    Driver Version: 1.1.0.182
    Apps: All
    Problem Description: Printer queue goes into a Paused mode and won't resume
    And to get you started, I have left a blank template at the end of this post.
    Also please make sure to include whether you have the 1022, 1022n, or 1022nw AND how it is connected to your Mac. If users of the 1020, what to chime in on this thread that is OK. Anyone else, please post in the FAQ thread or a different device specific thread. As the 1022 seems to be the most problematic at the moment, I'd like to track this down as quickly as possible.
    Just trying to help.
    Andrew
    =====
    Printer:
    Connection:
    Driver Version:
    Apps:
    Problem Description:

    Printer: LaserJet 1022
    Connection: USB connected to an Airport Express N (latest firmware, etc)
    Driver Version: 1.1.0.182
    Apps: All
    Problem Description: Can sometimes print a single page but then all status lights flash on printer and I have to turn the printer off - other times, nothing happens (printer pauses and will not resume). Have tried connecting via Bonjour and IP address but same problem occurs.

  • Please post the ISO at the same time you post the fast track

    Dear Microsoft,
    Please post the ISO at the same time you post the fast track.  Your update downloads do not always go as planned (you upgrade the whole works, instead of just what changed) and it becomes necessary to wipe and reinstall with the current ISO.  Starting
    with a defunct ISO and then going through the various hoops to get to the current version is a several day job, not to mention that the same mechanism that caused an update to crash also will occur.
    And post it to a web site with a complete list of the various revisions.  List them one on top of another.  Do not have a separate web page with each new preview that has to be Googled to find.  Let us see them all in one place.
    Many thanks,
    -T

    TAM2
    Suggest you use the built in feedback tool.  That is the only way to contact those who are actually working on the OS.
    Wanikiya and Dyami--Team Zigzag
    Directions?
          --->
    How to Send Feedback to Microsoft in the Windows 10 Technical Preview
    Carey Frisch
    Thank you.  Right under my nose!
    And they are not letting me use the tool unless I have one of their idiot account.  Not going to happen.

  • Mac mini Core Duo as HTPC...please post links.

    Pretty self explanatory.
    Thanks in advance,
    SX

    My apologies for not being clear, I guess. I simply wanted people to post links that expand on this issue, as well as any other relevant info.
    -If you use your mini as a Home Theatre PC (HTPC), then please discuss which components you have.
    -If you have articles about using the mini as a HTPC, then please post any links.
    -If you are an audio/visual expert that can write a few words of advice for a novice like me, then please post your thoughts.
    -Ya feel me now?
    : )

  • Can someone please post the password for the following HP Mini 110

      Customer brought in laptop and did remember the bios password.
    We tried the suggested download win32 to submit the halt code and it did not work on xp or win7 in compatibility mode.     Can someone please post the password for the following HP Mini 110. 
        Halt code = CNU937BF2X
    thanks  Andy  Mountain Computers Inc.

    Hi,
    Try:
    e9lofxp874
    e9lofxp87r

Maybe you are looking for