4.3 Multi User Mode; Where?

According to Samsungs Official Site and the 4.3 Upgrade it talks about having us have "Multi User Mode" Which means you can pass your smartphone to someone else, they can log in and have access to all their stuff (emails Im thinking)
But I cant seem to find it on my cell phone. How bout you?
So then a Samsung Agent said it wasnt currently available on my device and gave me a list of what did change.
It said "Updated Interface: Home/Apps/Lock/Notification Panel" So I asked....what changed on Lock screen...perhaps the Multi User ability?
She said "No, a signature lock screen" I said "Hmmm" Yeah you have the ability to use your signature to lock unlock your device.
I said ....."I didnt get that update"
So I'm here asking the rest of you...how do I access the Multi Users function...where is it and also did anyone else get a "signature" option for lock screen?
Thanks

Sorry it took so long to respond; been busy.
Okay well what I viewed was off of Samsung's website so I know Verizon has nothing to do with it; just kinda sucks that its advertised and I'm mis-informed by the creator of my phone LOL
Providing Verizon will let me provide a link to a 3rd party site heres the link I got the info off of:
http://m.samsung.com/us/article/premium-suite-update-for-galaxy-devices?marsLinkCategory=mphone:mphone&MKM_RID=0130085086&MKM_MID=4289732&CID=eml-mb-cp-1013-499
Note at the very top of that page (link I provided) it says this: Our latest software update opens up a new world for your Galaxy S® 4, Galaxy Note® II and Galaxy S® III with Android 4.3, Galaxy Gear compatibility and an emphasis on security and privacy (no mention of the word Tablet, unless one of those words is implied?....myself I own a "Galaxy Note 10.1" tablet)

Similar Messages

Can't boot in to multi user mode

After a reboot, Arch went blank before launching gdm - it wouldn't respond to C-A-Backspace or anything. So I booted in to single user mode, and changed the runlevel to 3 and rebooted. When I try to log in from the CLI, the computer hangs, and never prompts for a password. Does anyone know what might cause this, and how it can be fixed? Until then it fixed, I'm stuck with my damn iBook running YDL
Thanks!

You could lave the machine off for a while, start it, let it freeze, shutdown, wait some more, then post here everything with a relavent timestamp from the logs. Assuming you can shutdown without messing up your filesystem that is - if you have to press the power button to turn off I wouldn't do too much of that.
Also, what did you do before the reboot? any upgrades?
Jack
PS: now going home, won't be back till tomorrow

Running Designer in multi-user mode on Citrix

We have multiple developers accessing DS 3.1 Designer via Citrix. Each time a developer logs in and launches Designer, they see the previous developers db log in information. We have since implemented the RunDSDesignerMU.bat script, but we're still having the same issue. Any ideas?

I think this is not possible as debugger attaches to the java process over a
specific port specified during wls startup.
Now if a debugger session is already active (read using the port) how can
others attach to the same port
Wondering why your are encountering this limitation. Ideally debugging is
done on development environments where each developer has a dedicated instance
to play with. Even in the event you go for a single installation, you could
create multiple server instance, one for each developer
Thoughts
anand
In article <3f0c3b90$[email protected]>, Dan wrote:
>
The problem we are facing is that starting WebLogic in the debug mode only allows
a single user to debug at a time. It does not allow multiple users to remotely
debug. Also, when a user is debugging, the WebLogic instance cannot be used by
other users - even for normal execution.
Supporting Information:
1. We have installed BEA WebLogic 7.0 on a Dual Xeon Processor machine with 1GB
RAM and deployed our J2EE application on this server.
2. The development is being done using JBuilder 8.0 Enterprise edition. All team
members have JBuilder 8.0 installed on their local workstations.
3. When we need to debug the application, we have to start the WebLogic server
using "StartRemoteWebLogic". This allows us to remotely debug the application
from our local workstations.

Performance degradation in Data Integrator Designer with Multi-user mode

Post Author: ccastrillon
CA Forum: Data Integration
We are developing an information system based on a DataMart populated with data using ETL processes built with Data Integrator. We are three people developing and when we work at the same time we begin to have problem of performance with Designer. Designer seems freeze sometimes and development process becomes painful.
Where is the problem? accessing repository? Is any known bug?
Job Server? but it happens even when we don't launch any job. Only building ETL processes manipulating objects (Dataflows, workflows,...etc).
We would appreciate any help. Thanks in advance.
Carlos Castrilló

Post Author: bhofmans
CA Forum: Data Integration
What do you mean with 'working at the same time' ? You need 3 different repositories if you want to work with 3 developers, so there should be no impact at all when working simultaniously...
-Ben.

Multi User Mode Won't run Program

I have Route 66 USA running with the windows gps device which came with the program. Originally I installed Route 66 as an administrator. Since then I have changed my account to a standard user and added an administrator account and a third user account.
Route 66 only works with my original user account or any user I setup with administration status. It will not allow the program to run from a second standard user. Why? I don't need admininstration account to run it using the original user account.
Apple Care will not help me figure out how to change the permissions and ownership to allow this second user to run the program because its 3rd party software even though I asked for help figuring out what the ownership/permissions stuff is all about or what they mean.

1. It is possible to do this in the Finder, but will
likely be more reliable and convenient to do it in
the Terminal.
2. You can run that command from any admin account on
the machine, and it will have the same effect from
any admin account.
3. Not for a third-party application, as the receipt
for that application inside /Library/Receipts isn't
consulted if it exists at all.
4. See here and <A
HREF=http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/R
eference/ManPages/man1/chmod.1.html>here for
information.
(16550)
Perfect! Thanks big time! Printing it out and will check out the info!

Multi user mode in windows & itunes library sync

I moved my itunes music from my personal folder to shared documents folder & can not sync my ipod anymore. All my music is on my ipod as well as on the shared folder itunes library but itunes now opens with no music & I can not sync automatically.
What should I do?

Hi, olivier.
This article in the Apple Knowledge Base describes the steps you should have taken in changing the location of your iTunes Music folder.
Is it possible for you to backtrack the steps you took and then follow those instructions?

Problem with mode switching/Volume Panel in multi-user environment?

As above - using Windows 7 64-bit with an X-Fi Titanium Fatalty card.
All works well as long as I'm the only person logged in, but if my wife logs into the computer (using Windows 7's built-in multi-user mode...'fast user switching', which is enabled by default), and then I log back in...well, the volume panel app doesn't seem to work. In fact, even using the control panel app, I can't regain control of the soundcard enough to switch modes.
Logging her off doesn't resolve the issue, so it seems like something about her logging on (another user logging in, two volpanlu.exe running, something) is causing my instance to go haywire. [FWIW, I'm a 'standard' user on the PC, and her login is a 'limited' user]
Note that 'killing' the task volpanlu.exe in task managed, then going to the Windows services control panel and stopping and re-starting the 'Windows Audio' service, and finally re-launching volpanlu.exe from the start menu DOES always work to resolve the problem (regardless of if she's logged in or not...this always fixes it).
Still, that's a kinda annoyingly large set of steps to always have to go through whenever I want to change audio mode after she's logged in.
Is there any way to fix this? Any setting I could be missing to optimize the X-Fi control panel for multi-user environments? Any of the X-Fi mod dri've packs handle fast user switching better? Any other ideas?

GA little bit more tinkering around this, and I have some more information:
- Once I "seize control" (the kill of volpanlu, restart 'Windows Audio' service, re-launch volpanlu), if my wife logs back in, now *she* can't change the audio mode

Trying to access Lion server remote using multi-user access, but from a legacy Leopard system

Just purchased a mini server running Lion, and got screen sharing working fine from my legacy system (32-bit so Leopard only). However, I would like to run in multi-user mode, so someone can use the Lion system and another person can access their own account, from the older Leopard system, at the same time. Using multi-user rather than screen sharing. But Leopard does not have the option on the Finder/Share Screen command, the pop-up window to select screen sharing or new virtual session. So, is there a way still to run a new virtual session from a remote client running Leopard? Since the multi-user capability resides on the Lion server, it should be possible, but how, without the pop-up menu?
Message was edited by: Kurt-Syracuse

Hey. I suggest you check out http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9839785#9839785, where there are a couple solutions posted in regard to the error code -36 when connecting to a samba share. Good luck!
Jeremy A.
Tekserve Intern

Single User Mode : Read Only Filesystem

I can't edit files in single user mode as Root. When I try to edit them I get a msg saying "Read Only Filesystem".
I have tried chmod with no evial. I want to change my .profile as root so cls='clear'.
Any ideas?
Also when I try to login to my account in single user mode it says that account does not exist. However I'm in that accunt right now!
Thank You.

When you boot up into single user mode, there is a single recognized user -- root. That's why they call it single-user mode and not multi-user mode.
When you boot up into single user mode, the disk mounts as read-only. You have to make it writeable in order to do anything to it. I forget the actual command but it displays on the monitor nearby where it gives the "fsck" command syntax when you first boot into it. It's something like "mount -uw /" or something to that effect. It is saying to mount the root drive ("/") with user write privileges.
Then just "pico /Users/Mephux/.profile" (although I profess that I don't understand why you have to edit this file as root).
(if you find that this solves your problem, or is actually helpful towards arriving at a solution to your problem, please consider clicking on either the "helpful" or "solved" buttons above)

Smf / sometimes does not configure network interfaces in single-user mode?

From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/14785
When booting into single user mode, I often get a message
on the console
t_optmgmt: System error: Cannot assign requested addressand only the loopback interface is configured (lo0 inet, and lo0 inet6).
The system's dnet0 interface is not plumbed any more. Configuration
for the dnet0 network interface is via a static ip address; hostname
in /etc/hostname.dnet0, and and ip v4 address for that hostname in
/etc/hosts. This was a Solaris 10 x86 system, but the same problem
has also been observed on Solaris 10 sparc, and the hme0
interface.
svcs -x in single-user mode reports no problems.
Changing to multi-user mode by typing Ctrl-D still does not
configure the real network interface.
One thing that I've noticed is that smf's log file
/etc/svc/volatile/network-physical:default.log
is missing, when the nic interface was not configured.
It seems that the problem with unconfigured network interfaces
does not happen when I boot directly into multi-user mode.
Why isn't the physical interface plumbed and configured when
booting into single user mode on S10 b69?

Hi everyone,
I too have internet connection problem
I have installed Solaris 10 on my Compaq Presario M2000 series
Solaris Management Console Details:
Hostname: HOME
Host ID: 116c4141
Model: i86PC
no of CPUs: 1
CPU: 0
Type: Genuine Intel 6.13.8
Clock Speed: 1,500 MHz
Usage: 1%
Status: Online
Software SunOS 5.10
Physical Mem: 222 MB
Virtual Mem: 729 MB
Virt MEM used: 41 % (298/729) 413 MB available
IP address: 172.19.16.96
Network Connection rtls0: Sending & Receiving Packets
When running WinXP in my laptop before for same IP:
IP address: 172.19.16.96
Subnet mask: 255.255.240.0
Default Gateway: 172.19.31.254
while booting the OS said NFS+ version 4 was detected and the router IP is automatically configured or there is no specific individual router IP, says something like this
# ifconfig -a:
lo0: flag = 2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK, RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL>mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
rtls0: flags = 1000843<UP, BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4>mtu 1500 index 2
inet 172.19.16.96 netmask ffff0000 BROADCAST 172.19.255.255
ether 0:c0:9f:8c:c9
lo0: flags=2002000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL>mtu 8252 index 1
inet 6 :: 1/128
rtls0: flags = 2000840<RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4>mtu 1500 index 2
inet fe80::2c0:9fff:fe9a:8cc 9/10
ether 0:c0:9f:9a:8c:c9
I have modified the files and checked them:
1. etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 local host
172.19.16.96 HOME loghost
2. etc/hostname.rtls0
HOME
3. etc/hostname6.rtls0
HOME
4. etc/netmasks
172.19.16.255 255.255.240.0
I don't know the network IP so i just write this, can anyone tell me how to find the network IP
5. etc/defaultrouter
172.19.31.254
I made this file and wrote the default gateway IP address, can anyone tell me how to find default router IP since the NFS+ version 4 auto detects or auto assigns router IP
6. etc/resolv.conf
domain myhost.com
nameserver: 172.19.16.12
nameserver: 172.19.16.13
still domain name has't been set, i just wrote this, can anyone tell me how to find the domain name or create one. also the name server is just a fake, but how to find one. If i will be connecting my laptop to various IP whereever i go, so do i need to configure network setting again and again ? isn't there any auto network configuration so that i can connect internet where ever i go and let the system auto configure network settings like in windows XP auto IP configuration detect.
7. etc/nsswitch.conf
in this i can't see "hosts: files" but i could see rest of the details. so I inserted "hosts: files dns" in the third line and saved.
I ran the following command in the terminal to find the details:
#ypmatch host-name hosts
ypmatch: the domainname hasn't been set on this machine
(how to set domain name can anyone tell me?)
#move/etc/netmasks: not found
#uname -n
HOME
#cat/etc/nsswitch.conf
cat/etc/nsswitch.conf: not found
#domain name
domain: not found
#ypwhich
ypwhich: the domainname has'nt been set to this machine
#nismatch nameserver-name hosts.org-dir
hosts.org-dir: Error in accessing NIS+ cold file.......is NIS+ installed?
actually during installation i selected DNS type for network giving a wrong nameserver and domain got skipped later
#getent ipnodes dns (no response)
so all these things i did and found by seeing the forum guidelines. I can see the network connection has receivinh and sent packets seems to be working but can't browse internet, also can't ping a website.
if anyone had the same problem but found the answer than kindly let me know. I am new to solaris but i am trying my best.
awaiting reply from gurus
bye for now.................

Post install problem. Changes to the state or options of DB SUSDB can't be made at this time. DB Is in single-user mode.

Hi,
Have you ever come across this problem before.
Changes to the state or options of DB SUSDB can't be made at this time. DB Is in single-user mode and a user is currently connected to it.
It's preventing the post WSUS installation task from completing.
I opted to use the WID Database option and it created the SUSDB.
How can I resolve it?
Thanks

this sounds similar to some issues that occurred when KB2720211 was first release (the update does put the DB into single-user mode, to perform some tasks, then switches it back into multi-user mode. sometimes, that switch-back was not performed, and the
DB was left in single-user mode).
You can refer to this thread, the steps are buried in there.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/531d576b-eeaf-40dc-9057-b3adbde6186f/kb2720211-debacle-is-this-acceptable-microsoft-quality?forum=winserverwsus
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

Restore DB from backup with move - need to set to single user mode first and then reset to multiuser?

Im going to restore a recent backup from a production server DB to a test server DB and I want to do it through tsql. The DB already exists on the test server, I just want to overwrite it with a fresh copy. There may or may not be some activity
on the test server that is connected to the database, but its not important and can be abandoned/discarded.
This is what Im getting ready to do
First, get an idea of what the file paths are specified in the backup file
RESTORE FILELISTONLY FROM DISK = 'file_back_to_backup here .back .dat etc'
Then, set the DB to singleuser mode, and discard any connections/transactions currently started
ALTER DATABASE MyDBName
SET SINGLE_USER WITH
ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE
Then, do the restore, specifying the paths to the mdf/ldf files that already exist.
RESTORE DATABASE MyDBName
FROM DISK
WITH MOVE 'db logical name' TO 'new data path .mdf', MOVE 'log logical name' TO 'new log path.ldf';
Questions:
(1) If I specify the data and log file paths as ones that already exist, will they be overwritten? This is what I want, as I just want to copy the prod db over to the test server.
(2) Do I need to explicitly reset the DB back to multiuser mode, or does this happen after the restore?
(3) Anything missing from the above script(s) ? Suggestions?

Questions:
(1) If I specify the data and log file paths as ones that already exist, will they be overwritten? This is what I want, as I just want to copy the prod db over to the test server.
(2) Do I need to explicitly reset the DB back to multiuser mode, or does this happen after the restore?
(3) Anything missing from the above script(s) ? Suggestions?
1.Just restore the backup with REPLACE command and it will overwrite the current database.
2.No , database will be automatically put to Multi user mode if you are restoring with recovery
3. Single user script is fine .Change restore script like no need to use with move option
restore database db_name from disk='location' with replace
Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers
I think I will still need WITH MOVE, as the files in the backup are using a different path than where they are located on the test server, correct?
RESTORE DATABASE MyDBName
FROM DISK
WITH MOVE 'db logical name' TO 'new data path .mdf', MOVE 'log logical name' TO 'new log path.ldf' WITH
REPLACE;

Several users on a single file issue: Hosting a multi user Quickbooks file on the WD EX4

Hello everyone. This is going to sound like a super specific third party support issue - but there are some universal things going on here that may help others regarding multiple users of individual files on the EX4. My company houses client and billing files on the EX4. It's all been well and good until we recently allowed multi-user access to our Quickbooks company file. Of course the goal is to have multiple employees working on the file at the same time from different computers. We purchased licenses for each - everything is on the up and up. Whereas I could access the company file on the EX4 with no problems on my computer as a single user, now as soon as I turn on multiuser mode in QB to allow others to access the file on the EX4, the file becomes inaccessible. What do you guys think is happening where one user access to a file on the EX4 is fine, but multiuser access causes the file to be inaccessible? How do you fix it? Other thoughts, there doesn't seem to be a limitation on the EX4 relating to multiple people accessing the same file - streaming the same song for example. So why would a billing database file be any different? Especially when the licenses and program allow that access. Here's more info, if I host the file on my desktop computer everyone can access it in multiuser mode over the network. The limitation is the WD EX4. What do you think is going on? (I'd appreciate any insight as I am talking to both tech support teams, QB and WD, this week.)

Thank you so much for your reply. The error shows up when one switches to multi-user mode. It states: Error H101, H202, H303, or H505: when opening your company file When you open a company file in multi-user mode, you see an error:You're trying to work with a company file located on another computer, and this copy of QuickBooks can't reach the server on that computer (H202).You're trying to work with a company file located on another computer, and that computer needs additional installation and setup. (H101, H303, and H505).It appears that the QuickBooks software on computer [server name] is set up to allow shared connections to the company file, but the QuickBooks software on your computer is unable to communicate with it. (H202).Most often it's an H202 error which suggests that the program can't reach the server on that computer (NAS location). Why would the NAS location become invisible / unreachable once multi-user mode is on? I really appreciate your expert brainstorm and ideas.

10.6.2 SMB - QB 2005 PC won't run in Multi User

Hi there,
This is a pretty specific issue but i'll throw this out anyway.
I setup a brand new 10.6.2 server alongside our old 10.4.11 server.
I cloned the contents of the "shared data" from the old box to the new one.
We have had the SMB service running for Quickbooks 2005 running on 2 PCs (Xp Pro clients), shared via QB's "Multi User" mode.
The new server's SMB share, identical in permissions etc to the old one, will not allow QB to open the file in Multi User mode. It gives an error to the effect of "Your company file has been damaged". My attempts to repair the QB file had no effect.
If I copy the same company file back onto our old Tiger Server's SMB share, it works fine. I assume this is simply a difference in Samba versions, but I have no idea how to troubleshoot it.
I obviously have a workaround for now, but it's less than ideal to have an entire Xserve on to share a Quickbooks file.
Any insight would be appreciated.
~p

Bumped into this article; I'll post back after i give it a shot.
http://edoceo.com/liber/network-samba-quickbooks
The gist of it:
"the directories that will be the root of the share must be owned by the group that the users who will access are in and they must be able to write"

Single user mode session lost after backgound processes jump in

We have an application running on SQL server. This application restores DB very frequently using Single user mode. Following are the SQLs that are executed to restore the database in single user mode and to get the database back in multi user mode.
alter database [test-db] set single_user with rollback immediate; --This sql is run using test-db
use master;restore database [test-db] from database_snapshot = 'snapshot_test-db';
alter database [test-db] set multi_user;
After switching the test-db to single user mode some 4-5 background processes of Taskmanager jump in for the test-db kicking off the session that application has taken over in single user mode . These background process are deadlocked between them selves.
Please refer to the output of sp_who2 below at link.
http://social.microsoft.com/Forums/getfile/200625
and following is the deadlock XML.
NOTE: SPIDs in deadlock XML may differ from the output of sp_who2 as spids keeps on changing for these processes.
<deadlock-list>
<deadlock victim="process4bbfc78">
<process-list>
<process id="process4bbfc78" taskpriority="0" logused="10000" waitresource="DATABASE: 5 " waittime="705" schedulerid="1" kpid="1648" status="background" spid="22" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="0">
<executionStack/>
<inputbuf>
</inputbuf>
</process>
<process id="process6d44388" taskpriority="0" logused="10000" waitresource="DATABASE: 5 " waittime="419" schedulerid="1" kpid="5796" status="background" spid="30" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="0">
<executionStack/>
<inputbuf>
</inputbuf>
</process>
<process id="process6d44718" taskpriority="0" logused="10000" waitresource="DATABASE: 5 " waittime="109" schedulerid="1" kpid="3908" status="background" spid="16" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="0">
<executionStack/>
<inputbuf>
</inputbuf>
</process>
<process id="process4bbee38" taskpriority="0" logused="10000" waitresource="DATABASE: 5 " waittime="313" schedulerid="1" kpid="2656" status="background" spid="15" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" trancount="0">
<executionStack/>
<inputbuf>
</inputbuf>
</process>
</process-list>
<resource-list>
<databaselock subresource="FULL" dbid="5" dbname="unknown" id="lock4671600" mode="S">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process6d44718" mode="S"/>
<owner id="process4bbee38" mode="S"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process4bbfc78" mode="X" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</databaselock>
<databaselock subresource="FULL" dbid="5" dbname="unknown" id="lock4671600" mode="S">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process4bbfc78" mode="S"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process6d44388" mode="X" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</databaselock>
<databaselock subresource="FULL" dbid="5" dbname="unknown" id="lock4671600" mode="S">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process4bbfc78" mode="S"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process6d44718" mode="X" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</databaselock>
<databaselock subresource="FULL" dbid="5" dbname="unknown" id="lock4671600" mode="S">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process4bbfc78" mode="S"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process4bbee38" mode="X" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</databaselock>
</resource-list>
</deadlock>
</deadlock-list>
On searching for this problem I found out that people have faced similar problem but I was unable to find out the root cause and debug steps for this problem. Stopping the SQL server is provided as a solution to kick out these background processes but this
is not a feasible in our case as code to restore DB runs very frequently resulting in this problem at a good frequency.
I also made sure that SQL Server Agent is not running. The SQL services running on server are SQL server, SQL Server Browser and SQL Server VSS Writer.
Any help will be appreciated as this is a blocker problem.
Thanks,

Hi Amrita,
We can open a transaction, make data modifications to generate a lot of transaction log, and then run ALTER DATABASE AppDB SET MULTI_USER in the same transaction. You can also refer to the following document:
Getting out of single user mode:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dfurman/archive/2012/01/20/getting-out-of-single-user-mode.aspx
Allen Li
TechNet Community Support

4.3 Multi User Mode; Where?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for