4-4-5-Error-Financial year variant periods K5 are not in increasing order

Hi,
As per the client requirement I have to configure the Posting Periods in the Calender Year
Month     Posting Period     Days in the period          From     To
January     1     31     1                                  1-Jan-09     31-Jan-09
February     2     28     2                                  1-Feb-09     28-Feb-09
March     3     35     3                                  1-Mar-09     4-Apr-09
April     4     28     4                                  5-Apr-09     2-May-09
May     5     28     5                                  3-May-09     30-May-09
June     6     35     6                                  31-May-09     4-Jul-09
July     7     28     7                                  5-Jul-09     1-Aug-09
August     8     28     8                                  2-Aug-09     29-Aug-09
Septem     9     35     9                                  30-Aug-09     3-Oct-09
October     10     28     10                                   4-Oct-09     31-Oct-09
Novem     11     28     11                                   1-Nov-09     28-Nov-09
Decemb     12     33     12                                  29-Nov-09     31-Dec-09
As per this requirement I have configured the following
1. Copied F/Y variant K4 to K5
2. Made the following settings
month     Days     Period
1     31     1
2     28     2
3     31     3
4     4     3
4     30     4
5     2     4
5     30     5
5     31     6
6     30     6
7     4     6
7     31     7
8     1     7
8     29     8
8     31     9
9     30     9
10     3     9
10     31     10
11     28     11
11     30     12
12     31     12
When I save this setting the following error is given
Financial year variant periods K5 are not in increasing order
Message no. FGV555
Diagnosis
The posting periods are not in ascending order.
Procedure
Specify the posting periods with the calendar year in ascending order
Request you to please let me know if there is a solution.
Regards,
Ambuj
+919739976912

Ambuj,
In your settings for fiscal year variant K5, you do not need the following entries:
3     31     3
4     30     4
5     31     6
6     30     6
7     31     7
8     31     9
9     30     9
10     31     10
11     30     12
Please try removing these entries and see if that resolves the error.
You only need to account for the last day of the calendar year (12/31/xxxx). You do not need to account for the last day of every calendar month. As a result, you do not need entries for the last days of January - November, unless the last day of the month is also the last day of the period, as is the case for your periods 1 and 2. That is why the entries for the entries for 1/31 and 2/28 are OK, but the other calendar month end entries should be removed.
Regards,
Shannon

Similar Messages

Error while saving FYV : Gaps in financial year variant periods

Hello Experts,
We are getting an error while saving a new FYV as:
Gaps in financial year variant periods XY
Message no. FGV556
Diagnosis
The period specification has gaps. The periods must be sequentially numbered without any gaps.
System Response
Only a correctly defined period assignment can be saved.
Procedure
Define the periods with consecutive numbers.
Details: The new FYV has 52/53 weeks as posting periods depending on calendar year.
For example, we are trying to define Fisc 2009 as follows. (Fiscal year 2009 = Nov 01 2008 to Oct 31 2009).
Month-Day-Period-Yearshift
11     ---     7     ---     1     ---     +1
11     ---     14     ---     2     ---     +1
11     ---     21     ---     3     ---     +1
11     ---     28     ---     4     ---     +1
12     ---     5     ---     5     ---     +1
12     ---     12     ---     6     ---     +1
12     ---     19     ---     7     ---     +1
12     ---     26     ---     8     ---     +1
12     ---     31     ---     9     ---     +1
1     ---     3     ---     9     ---     0
1     ---     10     ---     10     ---     0
1     ---     17     ---     11     ---     0
1     ---     24     ---     12     ---     0
1     ---     31     ---     13     ---     0
2     ---     7     ---     14     ---     0
2     ---     14     ---     15     ---     0
2     ---     21     ---     16     ---     0
2     ---     28     ---     17     ---     0
3     ---     7     ---     18     ---     0
3     ---     14     ---     19     ---     0
3     ---     21     ---     20     ---     0
3     ---     28     ---     21     ---     0
4     ---     4     ---     22     ---     0
4     ---     11     ---     23     ---     0
4     ---     18     ---     24     ---     0
4     ---     25     ---     25     ---     0
4     ---     2     ---     26     ---     0
5     ---     9     ---     27     ---     0
5     ---     16     ---     28     ---     0
5     ---     23     ---     29     ---     0
5     ---     30     ---     30     ---     0
6     ---     6     ---     31     ---     0
6     ---     13     ---     32     ---     0
6     ---     20     ---     33     ---     0
6     ---     27     ---     34     ---     0
7     ---     4     ---     35     ---     0
7     ---     11     ---     36     ---     0
7     ---     18     ---     37     ---     0
7     ---     25     ---     38     ---     0
8     ---     1     ---     39     ---     0
8     ---     8     ---     40     ---     0
8     ---     15     ---     41     ---     0
8     ---     22     ---     42     ---     0
8     ---     29     ---     43     ---     0
9     ---     5     ---     44     ---     0
9     ---     12     ---     45     ---     0
9     ---     19     ---     46     ---     0
9     ---     26     ---     47     ---     0
10     ---     3     ---     48     ---     0
10     ---     10     ---     49     ---     0
10     ---     17     ---     50     ---     0
10     ---     24     ---     51     ---     0
10     ---     31     ---     52     ---     0
The above entries cover all the dates in calendar year 2009, that is, Jan 2009 to Oct 2009 is covered by periods 10 to 52 and Nov 01 2009 to Dec 31 2009 is covered by period 1 to 9 of the following fiscal year 2010.
Inspite of making sure that all the days of 2009 are covered by periods 1 to 52. We are still unable to save the FYV.
Please help!
Susan

Hello, I am getting this error while saving the FSV. My FSV is based on Weeks. Below is what I am inputting for this. Other details are Calender Year - 2017, No. of posting periods - 53, checked year dependent. Also, I have FSV for previous years also where weeks are 52 but configured as 53. So, hope that this is not creating this issue. Solicit your early response.
Month
Day
Period
Year Shift
1
7
1
0
1
14
2
0
1
21
3
0
1
28
4
0
2
4
5
0
2
11
6
0
2
18
7
0
2
25
8
0
3
4
9
0
3
11
10
0
3
18
11
0
3
25
12
0
4
1
13
0
4
8
14
0
4
15
15
0
4
22
16
0
4
29
17
0
5
6
18
0
5
13
19
0
5
20
20
0
5
27
21
0
6
3
22
0
6
10
23
0
6
17
24
0
6
24
25
0
7
1
26
0
7
8
27
0
7
15
28
0
7
22
29
0
7
29
30
0
8
5
31
0
8
12
32
0
8
19
33
0
8
26
34
0
9
2
35
0
9
9
36
0
9
16
37
0
9
23
38
0
9
30
39
0
10
7
40
0
10
14
41
0
10
21
42
0
10
28
43
0
11
4
44
0
11
11
45
0
11
18
46
0
11
25
47
0
12
2
48
0
12
9
49
0
12
16
50
0
12
23
51
0
12
30
52
0
12
31
1
+1
Thanks
Deepankar

Gaps in financial year variant periods IW

Hi All,
how to fill the Gaps in financial year variant periods IW. i am not able to finish these!!!
we have 52 weeks, when i am posted i am facing the above error.
thanks and regards
Prathap

Hi..
When you go to in T.code OB29, you will find 'number of posting period' based on your posting period you change the number of posting period and maintain the numbers.
And your problem could be solved by going into OB29, select the Fiscal Year Variant, then click on Shortened Fiscal Year and enter the year where you get the error message. Then click on New Entries and enter 52, if for the year in question you only have 52 periods, which can absoluteley be fine, depending how the weekdays fall in a calendar year. Save and record on transport. Check if the error message you were getting still appears in your period definition screen.
And also Please check the SAP Note 849016 - OB29: FGV556 (period gaps) incorrect.
Hpoe it will helps
Thanks.

BEX Error: SYST: Period 053 is not valid in financial year variant M2

Hi All,
We have a merchandising report which bring the data for current year and previous year. While I execute the data for Fiscal Year/Period - 011.2011, I get the output. But when I execute the report for Fiscal Year/Period - 012.2011, I receive the below error.
SYST: Period 053 is not valid in financial year variant M2
We have variants M4 and M2.
M4 is month wise where are M2 is weekly.
In table T009B, we have a record for week 053 for year 2011 whereas we don't have a record for week 053 in year 2010. This is obvious as there are only 52 weeks in 2010 but 53 in 2011.
I'm not able to track the exact reason for this error.

Hi All,
Thanks for the reply.
I have tried maintaining entry for week 053 against year 2010 in T009B but this didn't work. I checked the 'Check Table' button for any dependencies and I saw T009 table.
I maintained the entry as below in T009 table and it worked. Can someone explain how this work?
Earlier entry for which I received the error:
Fi.Year Variant    Year-dependent     Posting period    Special        Periods Description
M2                            X                      052                     00              Retail Calendar Weekly
Changed entry for which the error stopped appearing
Fi.Year Variant    Year-dependent     Posting period    Special        Periods Description
M2                            X                      053                     00              Retail Calendar Weekly
Please help me understand so that if I transport the entry to Production, I don't face any serious issues.
Regards,
Murthy

Error in AS01 E003 SYST: Period 000 is not valid in financial year variant

Hello SAP Gurus,
I am encountering an error when creating an asset for a certain CC. Upon saving, error message 'E003 SYST: Period 000 is not valid in financial year variant' appears which prevents me creating the asset. My FY Variant K4 is already assigned in the correct company code. Not sure if this has something to do in period control, posting period or FY variant.
Can someone help me explain the root cause of my error?
Thanks in advance.
Carlo

Basically, period control will determine the depreciation start date. For 02, it is Pro rata upto mid-period at period start date.
This is means that for asset value date after mid month, depreciation will be start from next month.
As an example,
asset value date from 01.01.2012 to 15.01.2012 -> Depreciation start date is 01.01.2012
asset value date from 16.01.2012 to 31.01.2012 -> Depreciaiton start date is 01.02.2012
etc

Customer Exit Variable Period 000 is not valid in financial year variant Z2

Hi all,
I am trying to get the week number from a particular posting period. But I get this error when I execute the Query:
Error Group
RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE
Message
SYST: Period 000 is not valid in financial year variant Z2
I checked in "FIRST_DAY_IN_PERIOD_GET" FM and it is not accpting period 000 for PERIV Z2. It works fine for all other periods.
Does anyone have an idea on this?
Thanks.

Simon,
So do you think that there is a problem in my Query restrictions? You ask me to restrict from 0 - 12, but this period is calculated based on the SY_DATUM in a cust. exit variable. And this period is being used to pull week number. So, do I need to change the code?
But I already have another query which is similar to this, only ready for input options are missing in the new one. The older one is working fine but the I have problem with this.
Any more ideas?
Thanks!!

FGV003 - SYST: Period 000 is not valid in financial year variant K4

Hello,
I am getting the error below when trying to bring Period 000/2008 from our BCS cube into a basic cube. I've run the "Transfer Global Settings" for our R/3 system but am still getting this error. The BCS does have Period 000 Yr 2008 with FYV K4 and is showing in the master data for fiscal period. Any ideas??
SYST: Period 000 is not valid in financial year variant K4
Thanks,
Senthil

Dear colleagues:
The same problem is appearing to me. I am trying to run a job in background but the following error appears to me>
SYST: Period 000 is not valid in financial year variant 36
Do you know what I have to do to suprime the error?
The job I am trying to run is for creating an evaluation in order to run the report S ALR 87012167
Your Sincerely
Leonardo López
FI Consultant

SYST Period 012 is not valid in financial year variant R2 Msg no;FGV003

Hi SAP Gurus,
I have encountered with an error as following :
SYST: Period 012 is not valid in financial year variant R2
Message no. FGV003
Our client following calendar year till December 2009. They want to change to April to March , from April 2010 . So we need to define a shortened fiscal year for January to March 2010 for 3 months.
One important thing is Depreciation should be calculated only for 3 months ie., from January 2010 to March 2010 for year 2010. For year 2011 u2013 April 2010 to March 2011 be calculated.
I have done the following settings :
Current fiscal year variant = K4, i.e. the standard variant with 12 periods (calendar year)
-the current fiscal year must be closed on 31.12.2009
-this change have to be done in the next month, i.e. on 01.01.2010
-on 1.1..2010 starts the new fiscal year 2010
-the fiscal year 2010 ends on 31.03.2010 and have 3 posting periods
1) Create a new Fiscal Year Variant for the shortened fiscal year u2013 e.g. "R2" (OB29).
2) R2 to be made Year Dependent. Current Period Configuration
Month Days Period Year Shift
1 31 1 0
2 28 2 0
3 31 3 0
4 30 4 0
5 31 5 0
6 30 6 0
7 31 7 0
8 31 8 0
9 30 9 0
10 31 1 +1
11 30 2 +1
12 31 3 +1
3) Company Code assignment (OB37): K4 to be replaced with R2 .
4) Controlling Area (OKKP): K4 to be replaced with R2.
5) Fiscal Year to be shortened for Depreciation Areas in Asset Accounting customization (OAYP).
6) Table T093C to be viewed to check whether the field XRUMPF (Shortened Fiscal Year) has been activated with u201CXu201D..(SE 11 Check Table) Done manually
Other Problem : 1. The system calculates deprecation for period 3 ( Full year deprecation) as seen from AW01n for one asset.
2. When I run AFAB for 2010 period 1 the error is displayed
SYST: Period 012 is not valid in financial year variant R2
Message no. FGV003
Please anybody help me in this issue .
Subbu

Have you maintained the Year Shift Properly in OB29
For e.g if Financial Year is from July to June, year shift will be as follows:
Month      Days        Period       Year Shift
1     31     7     0
2     29     8     0
3     31     9     0
4     30     10     0
5     31     11     0
6     30     12     0
7     31     1     +1
8     31     2     +1
9     30     3     +1
10     31     4     +1
11     30     5     +1
12     31     6     +1
Check also FI period and aseet periods are open through OB52 and AJAB

SYST: Period 012 is not valid in financial year variant V3 Message no. FGV0

Hi!
While I am going to create Asset it is giving me following error :
SYST: Period 012 is not valid in financial year variant V3
Message no. FGV003
I checked in OB29, I have maintained 12 period,
can you please tell me what will be the problem.
Rakesh

Have you maintained the Year Shift Properly in OB29
For e.g if Financial Year is from July to June, year shift will be as follows:
Month      Days        Period       Year Shift
1     31     7     0
2     29     8     0
3     31     9     0
4     30     10     0
5     31     11     0
6     30     12     0
7     31     1     +1
8     31     2     +1
9     30     3     +1
10     31     4     +1
11     30     5     +1
12     31     6     +1
Check also FI period and aseet periods are open through OB52 and AJAB

"SYST: Period 012 is not valid in financial year variant Z4"

Hi
Iam getting this error "SYST: Period 012 is not valid in financial year variant Z4"
in Asset accounting when using the shortend fiscal yr with 9 periods in 2010.
Generated the period control OA84 for this variant Z4 but still getting the error.
Please advise.
Thanks in advance

Srini,
Our FY is Apr 2 march.
For 2010 , i put below and in shortend fiscal yr tab i put 9. still having this error.
1     31     10     -1
2     28     11     -1
3     31     12     -1
4     30     1     0
5     31     2     0
6     30     3     0
7     31     4     0
8     31     5     0
9     30     6     0
10     31     7     0
11     30     8     0
12     31     9     0
Please help
Thanks,
Heera

Period 012 is not valid in financial year variant V3

Hi all
i already posted this issue on ASSET ACCOUNTING two weaks ago ....but still waiting for your responce .............
Can any one pls help me out ..........its an urgent ...........
when i check dep. thro' t.code AW01N/AS02 i am getting an error like "SYST: Period 012 is not valid in financial year variant V3".....
i don't know why the system is throwing this type of error and where i have to do changes...........
i am in 4.6c and the dep has not been run for long time . i suppose the last time the dep may be in year 2003......
Can u guide how to rectify his error........ and bring all the assets upto date and run the dep in the SAP system.
Presently my clients are posting the manual JV's for every Quater.
Any help in this would be highly appreciated....
Revert
Regards
Praveen

Hi,
Posting periods are controlled by two ways.
one is technical point of view - OB52 (see here are you maintain account type wise or *)
second is FI-MM point of view go for OMSY. You can see what are current period open for your company code. You can use T.code MMPV- for close the posting periods and MMRV to open or allow the period for posting.
Hope this is fine, If yes assign points,
Regards,
Sankar

SAP BW DTP error: Fiscal year variant is not maintained for calendar year

Hi experts,
Running DTP for loading 2LIS_12_VCITM results in following error "Fiscal year variant A2 is not maintained for calendar year 2012".
I have already done following checks:
- the fiscal variant A2 exists for the fiscal year 2012 in the BW system (T009 tables)
- the DTP does only give this error for 2 company codes, and works fine for other company codes
- in our R3 system, the fiscal year variant A2 is assigned to all the company codes, how or where can I check this assignment in the BW system ?
Kind regards, Guy Verschueren

Hi
Please check the following threads
"Fiscal year variant V3 is not maintained for calendar year 2011" (OAOB)
Error FGV002: Fiscal year variant & is not maintained for calendar year &
Hope it helps.
Thanks,
Rajesh.
Please assign points to answers if you find them heplful

I made the mistake of resetting my iPod to factory defaults. Now it will only partially sync to my music library. I continually get an error message saying that certain songs are not authorized for my computer. Any ideas?

I made the mistake of resetting my iPod to factory defaults. Now it will only partially sync to my music library. I continually get an error message saying that certain songs are not authorized for my computer, although they are in the iTunes library on the computer and will play. It's these songs that won't transfer to the iPod. I have deauthorized and re-authorized the computer but no joy. Any ideas?

Hello there DesertRat71,
I was thinking that some of the songs in your library may have been purchased under a different apple id. You have already done the first thing I would have done by de authorizing and re authorizing. To verify this, highlight one of the songs that will not sync over and use File>Get Info. Here is the help menu link for it if you need it help://bookmark='https://help.apple.com/itunes/mac/11.0/help/index.html?localePa th=English.lproj#itns2937'
In the Summary section there will be an Apple ID entry. If it shows something different than what you are currently using then I recommend signing into the Apple ID it shows and authorizing the computer for that one as well.
All the best,
Sterling

ERROR:MapLib:973 - Tri-state buffers are not supported in this architecture.

Hi,
I face a ERROR:MapLib:973 problem with inout port in a pcore component.
I need ton instantiate an inout port at the top level to communicate wih my peripherical.
This inout port is driven by an XPS IP core (pcore).
The .mpd is :
PORT fdata = "", DIR = INOUT , VEC = [31:0], ENABLE=SINGLE, THREE_STATE = TRUE,TRI_I = fdata_I, TRI_O = fdata_O, TRI_T = fdata_T
PORT fdata_I = "", DIR = I , VEC = [31:0]
PORT fdata_O = "", DIR = O , VEC = [31:0]
PORT fdata_T = "", DIR = O
The .vhd is :
fdata_o : out std_logic_vector(31 downto 0);
fdata_i : in std_logic_vector(31 downto 0);
fdata_t : out std_logic ;
I got ERROR:MapLib:973 - Tri-state buffers are not supported in this architecture messages for each
signals of my fdata PORT, while mapping !
Thanks for you help.

What device are you targeting, and what version of the software are you using?
I target a xc7k325t-fbg676-2.
I use ISE 14.3 form platgen to xst and 14.7 from map to bitgen.
What does your top level HDL (verilog or VHDL) file look like (where the IO must be instantiated)?
It is a .vhd in whitch i wrapp my top XPS core, described by .mhs
The problematic IO port is instantiated into the mb_core.vhd (generated by XPS).
If i open it, i could see that the tool correctly infer the corresponding IOBUF's :
component mapping :
fdata_I => FX3_DQ_I,
fdata_O => FX3_DQ_O,
fdata_T => FX3_DQ_T,
One IOBUF infered:
iobuf_1 : IOBUF
port map (
I => FX3_DQ_O(31),
IO => FX3_DQ(31),
O => FX3_DQ_I(31),
T => FX3_DQ_T
Top level port :
FX3_DQ : inout std_logic_vector(31 downto 0);
THEN FX3_DQ signal is dirrectly branched in my upper level (top level) vhd file, with the same name.
What do your constraints file look like (where the pin number and names get declared)?
The port is only constrained in .ucf, like that:
NET FX3_DQ[0] LOC = "B24"| IOSTANDARD = LVCMOS33 ;
NET FX3_DQ[31] LOC = "G26"| IOSTANDARD = LVCMOS33 ;#Bank 14

Error in Installing Netweaver--domain controllers are not supported

When i make the pre-requisite check for installing Netweawer 2004s
I am getting the follwoing error
<b>installation to domain controllers are not supported</b>
Pls help me how to resolve this
Thanks in Advance

hi balaji,
FYI,
You cannot create local users and groups on the host that is used as domain controller. Therefore, we do not support running an SAP instance (including the database instance) on the host where the DNS service is installed.
so try to log with a user, who has administrator rights. and check whtr all the services are up & running. then try to re-install.
for more on this refer the installation manual.
hope this will help you.
with regards,
Rajesh.
<i> plz, award with suitable points </i>

4-4-5-Error-Financial year variant periods K5 are not in increasing order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for