4.7 x 2.00 Support Pack Question

Hello,
I am attempting to apply upgrade from PI_BASIS 2004_1_620 to PI_BASIS 2005_1_620 on an R/3 Enterprise 4.7 x 2.00 System.
Using the SAINT tool, I am bringing in the SAPKINBB7A OCS package. I have tried the following queues:
SAPKINBB7A by itself
SAPKINBB7A with follow-up patches SAPKIPYJ51 to 3
SAPKINBB7A with follow-up patches SAPKIPYJ51 to 7
Each time, I get an IMPORT_PROPER failure:
Error in phase: IMPORT_PROPER
Reason for error: TP_STEP_FAILURE
Return code: 0012
Error message: OCS Package ALL, tp step "N", return code 0012
The error has the symptom of notes 794802 and 751864. However, the 751864 code is already present in the system before I begin.
If anyone has seen this particular set of circumstances, I would appreciate the input.
Regards,
John

Hello,
My SPAM/SAINT is updated to the latest level (patch 20). My Kernel is patched up to level 129.
I tried the Extras >> Ignore generation errors. However, this simply returned the message, "No generation errors found".
After further review of the logs, etc. I came across note 903242 which described the problem perfectly. After applying the suggested solution, the support packs proceeded to the next step.
Thank you for your help.
Regards,
John

Similar Messages

Support Pack General Question:- IMPORT_PROPER phase

Hi All,
Is there any command at OS level to complete IMPORT_PROPER phase of SPAM transaction (support pack import)?

Hi ,
Is there any command at OS level to complete IMPORT_PROPER phase of SPAM transaction (support pack import) in My QAS system............. ?
I tried the following command in my DEV & QAS System.but not solved.
C:\>tp cleanbuffer qas pf=myprofile.pfl
This is tp version 320.56.89 (release 620)
E-myprofile.pfl could not be opened.
EXIT
Error in myprofile.pfl: transdir not set.
tp returncode summary:
TOOLS: Highest return code of single steps was: 0
ERRORS: Highest tp internal error was: 0208
tp finished with return code: 208
meaning:
error in transportprofil (param missing, unknown,...)

Issues with POWL action buttons and row selection after Support Packs

We recently applied ECC 603 Support Stack 16 to our environment and are having problems with some SAP standard POWL lists (example is KYKOP-OPS-MM-PO-W: Purchase Orders for Goods Receipt). In fact all of the POWL lists that we are using are behaving the same way. There are 2 changes that have happened after moving to this stack.
1. In order to select a row in the list, we now have to press ctrl + click, previously, just clicking the the row would select it and fire the OnLeadSelection
2. All of the Action Buttons in the POWL lists are disabled.
I have debugged the Feeder Class /KYK/CL_MM_FEEDER_PO and see in th GetActions method and see that the ls_actions-enabled is getting set to true, but for some reason the buttons are disabled when the list is rendered.
I've checked a side-effects report from OSS and have come up empty handed. Has anyone else run into this?
Eric

I have found an OSS note that addresses this problem. This problem will effect anyone who is using ALV for ABAP WebDynpro after applying BASIS Support Pack 20 for 7.0. The OSS note is 1363334. Question Answered.

Pre-requisites for Support Packs in BI 7.0 System

Hello Everyone,
We are planning on applying support packs to our BI 7.0 system where we currently are at SP13 and we are not applying any support packs in ECC 6.0 system.
The question is,
Do we have to clear out the delta queues in ECC system before we can apply the support packs in BW system.
We will clear out the RSA7 in BW system.
So, the concern is do we need to have downtime in ECC if so....would it have to be through out the support pack process in BI system.
Please let me know would data be corrupted in ECC if we do not clear out the delta queues.
Because technically, we are not applying any changes in ECC system. All the support pack activities will be performed in BI environment and the RSA7 within BI will be taken care of. So, am not sure why would we have to clear out the delta queues in ECC when applying support packs in BI system which does not change anything on ECC side.
Any input would be appreciated.
Thanks
Dharma.

I am not sure about first two questions that you have asked.
Whenever you applying support packages in your BI system, no trasaction code should be executed. otherwise you would short dumps in your BI system.
you should lock all the userids before you go for upgrade. And no need of downtime in ECC but you should not do any load extraction from R/3.
Morever best thing is upgrading ECC as well. it is better to have both systems upgraded and in same level.
Hope my reply would help you in some extent.

SAP R/3 4.6 B Support pack level for AIX 5.2

Hi,
We have upgraded O.S version from AIX 4.3 to AIX 5.2. Here our environment is SAP R/3 4.6B and DB oracle 8.1.7.
My question: Do we apply any support pack to the system after support pack upgrade. Please find the below support pack level for our current system.
SAP_BASIS      46B           0054    SAPKB46B54
SAP_ABA         46B           0054    SAPKA46B54
SAP_APPL       46B           0054    SAPKH46B54
SAP_HR           46B           0000        -
ST-PI            2005_1_46B    0003    SAPKITLQC3
Please request the feedback.
Thanks & Regards,
Narayana Murthy.

Do we apply any support pack to the system after O.S upgrade ?
( Correction for the below posted mail)

Support pack level issue in Standard Finance Program.

Hi Everyone,
                i have an issue which is related to Finance. Actually, Finance People are Using a Standard Report (FS10N) - GL Account Line item display. There,Vendor and Customer Details are not displayed (Customer/Vedor Filed is empty) for the normal GL Account. But for the Reconsalation GL accounts they are able to see.
               For this issue SAP released an SNOTE 1107639 and correction delivered in SAP_APPL support pack 12.And we already applied it in the system and our current SAP_APPL level is 14. Though it is already available why the problem is still persist. Another thing is, for the same issue there is another SNOTE 1034354 which guides to enhancement thro' some BADI work in standard program.
              My question is that if the correction is available in a patch and that is imported as well in to system without any error then it should resolving the problem.but in this case why it does not work out or what could be the reason behind this. As a Basis admin i would like to know.
Thanks&Regards,
Siva

Hi Siva,
Your query is obsolutely acceptable...
After supportpack update some times database will not be synchronised with the new updates.
and more over it seems there is a complete issue with SAP side.... there is only one option in u r hand now just restart the system.but please make sure to take the down time...and check whether the correction is working or not..if not then no luck u need to contact SAP global team and ask them why the corrections are not working properly..
Regards,
Srini

ABAP + Java Support Pack installation

When updating support packs in an ABAP+Java environment (ECC 6.0), is there any reason why one could not do the Java Support Packs first, followed by the ABAP support packs? We are trying to update our support packs as efficiently as possible, and would like to update our java support packs first, followed by the ABAP stack a few days later.
In regards,
Michael

Hi!
There can probably not be a general answer to that question. There are some functionality where ABAP and JAVA are closely linked and where you'll most likely run into problems if the levels do not match.
Technically there is no problem as applying the SP-Stack for Java and applying SPs for ABAP are independent (technical) tasks, but you will have to VERY carefully check the dependencies and carefully test this in a QA-environment.
If you want my advice: Try to find a 'big shot' solution where you do all in one move.
Regards,
Jörg

Short dump in every transaction during support pack import - Solution Mgr

I am in the middle of applying support packs SP13 and SP14 for Solution Manager. In SPAM, during the import, I received short dumps. I get short dump for all transactions. The error message is 'Syntax error in program "SAPLWB_CUSTOMIZING", Field "G_DC_TABSTR" is unknown in INCLUDE LWB_CUSTOMIZINGDEV'.
Please help. Thanks !

Hi
My first question, would be, why are you performing other activities while importing patches?
This is not recommended.
Rahul

Applying Support Packs at GRC Access Control 5.3 overall solution level

Hi All
I recently noticed something at a customer, that GRC Access Controls 5.3 launch pad shows a different SP level e.g. version8, while the components, Compliant User Provisioning shown SP10, RAR shown SP12 etc.
My questions are;
1. Should SP updates be applied at a component level i.e. at RAR, CUP, ERM, and SPM level?
2. Would this customer scenario cause an issue in the future, when for example RAR is sitting on a different SP level than CUP etc.?
3. If GRC Access Controls launch pad shows SP level/version, does this SP level/version represent the SP level/version that applies to all components? or does this represent SP level/version of the launchpad only?
4. Are the Support Packs required to be applied on the ABAP stack as well?
Thanks
Odwa

Hi Odwa,
Please see my replies below.
1. Should SP updates be applied at a component level i.e. at RAR, CUP, ERM, and SPM level? NO, Just apply them to the entire GRC-AC from the JSPM
2. Would this customer scenario cause an issue in the future, when for example RAR is sitting on a different SP level than CUP etc.? Yes, one of these days there is going to be a problem becuas eof this
3. If GRC Access Controls launch pad shows SP level/version, does this SP level/version represent the SP level/version that applies to all components? or does this represent SP level/version of the launchpad only?
4. Are the Support Packs required to be applied on the ABAP stack as well? Yes they need to be applied on all the ABAP stacks as well, it is very omportant that support packs remain in sync everywhere.
Thanks!
Chinmaya
Edited by: chinmaya prakash on Dec 6, 2010 4:10 PM

IXOS workflow template 4.7 support pack stack 24 problem

We are upgrading to the above support pack. Using a customized workflow template created by IXOS we have uncovered a problem. When an entry is put into the sap inbox we have option of REJECT EXECUTION after which a menu is displayed with other actions.
The REJECT EXECUTION no longer works. In debugging the workflow we get to RH_TASK_ATTRIBUTES_RUNTIME but not to RH_GET_TASK_START_EVENTS.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Jean Wright

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

Downloading and installing a support pack

Hi,
I was wondering how I can download and install BI support pack 11 GUI 15?

Hi David,
Do you have your Satellite system configured in SMSY? Are you getting EWA reports generated under transaction DSWP for this satellite system in question? If so, then you are connected to SOLMAN. You can also do RFC testing via either transaction SMSY or SM59 or SDCCN within SOLMAN or the Satellite system.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Mark

Difference b/w support pack ,plugin nd path level nd how to recognise them

Hello Experts,
I have one question?
How to recognize Wt is Support package, wt is add on or Plug in ,and wt is patch level , what is the difference between them all and how to trace them and where from to apply them .
Requestd to revert at earliest,my email id is [email protected] .
Regards,
Somya

Hi Somya,
Support packs are the corrects to the SAP objects , we have to apply through SPAM where as SAINT will be used to install plugins and Add-ons. where are the patch level never play in your SAP.. it play between your operating system and SAP system.. that means the binary level fix.
I just tried to differentiate all the three things.
Please award points if i answered your question.
kind regards
Balamuralikrishnan.A

Objects are locked in open change requests during support packs update

Hi All,
We are applying support packs in the ECC Dev system. Its giving error in phase OBJECTS LOCKED..? after that i checked with ABAP consultant he given requests which i unlocked the objects from SE03. Still the same error Objects are locked in open change requests is coming.
If i checked requests which are not released, those are in hundreds which we can not release. How can i find a specific object which i need to unlock or any chance to skip the phase and continue. Because 15 days back i have updated the support packs without any of the issue.
Please suggest me whether i can find the specific objects to unlock or any other process.
Thanks & Regards,
Sreekanth

sreekanth jd wrote:
Still the same error Objects are locked in open change requests is coming.
>
Hello,
Normally when we double click on that error message 'objects are locked', system takes us to the transport requests containing those objects in question.
And did you try SE03 --> Objects in Requests --> Search for Objects in Requests/Tasks ?
Thanks

Support Pack upgrade path

We recently upgraded from ECC 6.0 support pack 9 to support pack 15. At the same time, we installed EHP4 support pack 5. A few questions:
1. Will we upgrade our ECC 6.0 support pack 15 system to the next support pack, for example to support pack16 or 17, OR will our support packs follow the EHP4 support pack update path, for example upgrading our current environment by moving from EHP4 support pack 5 to support pack 6?
2. We have not yet enabled any of the new EHP4 functions in our landscape. Is it recommended that if we upgrade EHP4 support pack 5 to support pack 6 we do a full integration test? If we haven't enabled any EHP4 support pack 5 functions, I wasn't sure if an integration test was needed.
thank you,
Jonathan

Hello Jonathan,
I hope you are aware of SPDD/SPAU.
Point to be notes is support package will not overwrite your own customizing (Z, Y).
and if you modified any Standard object for your purpose and its been overwritten by the Support package then you will definately get a prompt in SPDD and SPAU and you have a chance to take decision how would you like to go. whether you want to keep your customizing to the standard objects or you want the new standard code to overwrite it.
So, you will not need to do integration testing for complete things in your system.
Let me know if you need more clarifications.
Best Regards
Niraj

Support pack upgrade

BW gurus,
This morning Basis applied support pack 24 to our BW 3.1 systems. They said everything was ok. But the transactions in BW are taking way too long. for example rsa1 transaction is taking about 5 mins, and while this transaction is getting processed, I am getting messages at the bottom like "compling "<b>some prog name</b>"...in a separate task.
Does anyone know what might be the problem so that i can ask the basis the right questions??
Thanks
Ashwin

Hi Ashwin,
yes. thats common. The reason is that all the programs are mostly classes and they need to get compiled and their objects need to get generated. So this activity would occur one time for each transaction.
Bye
Dinesh

4.7 x 2.00 Support Pack Question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for