4 cores or 8 cores and which video card to choose

My father and I are presented with a dilemma. Should we get 8 core model or the 4 core model at several hundred dollars cheaper?
I have never actually bought for myself a computer, and I want to make this one last. At the moment, 8 cores is completely top of the line, and assuming I choose such a model, I will probably have an exceptionally well computer that will last be many, many years.
I am most likely going to at all times be running Windows and Leopard side by side using Parallels and have a game running in Windows and developing, browsing, chatting, watching movies, ventrilo, etc. in the other space.
For this reason, would it be wise to purchase the 8 core model? It is considerably cheaper to add the extra quad core with Apple as it is nearly half the price of one found on newegg or a dell configuration. I really want this computer to last and use it for a long time and play the most top of the line games with my friends such as Age of Conan, Crysis, etc. Also, I will have a 24 inch monitor that I will also need my computer to power.
My current computer cannot even run Age of Conan at the lowest quality settings. I figure if I want to be able to run this game at 1920x1200 resolution in Parallels while running applications on Leopard, shelling out the extra three or four hundred dollars would be worth it. Seeing as I will be using this computer for years, even though most applications do not use 8 cores now, they will then.
I believe that the 4 core model of the Mac Pro does not allow for an additional xeon quad core, so if I did buy the single quad core model, I would not be able to add another quad core, thus limiting me. Also, even if there were, it would void my warranty.
Also, I have heard of the 8800 GT causing some problems in the Mac Pro, typically in the first generation ones, however, I had seen cases of people noting problems in the January edition. I want to do a lot of gaming in this rig, and the 8800 is the de facto card of choice for most gamers, at a reasonable price. However, will it give me problems? I have heard of some people having 0 problems at all with this card. Will it give me those occasional blue and green lines through my monitor? Has Apple fully developed the drivers for this card? Will I have problems with it?
Thanks for any help and I await your responses.

Fromethius,
you cannot assing CPUs to the VM in Parallels. In VMware you can select 1 or 2 virtual CPU for the guest OS, though that doesn't neccessarily translate 1:1 with your physical CPUs.
As for games, neither VM nor Parallels with run most later games well; remember, shader support is only experimental right now, so your results will vary.
I play games on Mac natively, but it depends on which ones you are after.
The is no problem with the 8800 card. The issues talked about - which is valid - is it's subpar CORE performance. That hopefully will be addressed in a driver, but won't affect you.
As for the system - get all you can afford. Don't wait for 'upgrades' - you'll never buy s system otherwise as something new is always on the way.
I work with a lot of video so I have an 8 core 3.2 with 16GB or RAM - and would never want less. Does that mean you need that? Or someone else doesn't even need more? Not at all - you just need to see what you really mean to do. 4 cores and the 8800 should be just fine for you. IF you can afford the 8 core, in case you will do a lot of work at the same time, great. Otherwise, rather not skimp on memory. Anything under 4GB, IMHO, ain't good enough.
Cheers,
dan

Similar Messages

  • Which Video Card To Choose?

    I am looking to buy a Mac Pro and I'm not sure about what video card to buy. Looking at the Apple onlinstore I can configure with either a NVIDIA GeForce 7300 or the ATI Radeon X1900. My main use will be to run Final Cut Pro and other graphics programs like Flash and Photoshop. Which card is better to have? Also, Why is there an option to buy up to 4 of NVIDIA 7300 cards, but only 1 of the ATI Radeon? What is the advantage of buying multiple NVIDIA 7300 cards? Can you use multiple ATI Radeon cards?
    Any help would be great. Thanks!

    Get the ATI Radeon X1900 by all means.
    See http://www.apple.com/macpro/graphics.html and
    http://www.barefeats.com/quad05.html
    Quoting: …Apple's Mac Pro GRAPHICS page shows the X1900's specs and performance so close to the $1650 Quadro FX 4500 and so far above the GeForce 7300 GT that the choice is a no-brainer for most consumers and professionals.…
    12" PB G4/1.2GHz- Mac Book Pro 17" - 12" iB G3/500 MHz - Mac mini G4 as server   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

  • Which video card to buy for Mac Pro and AE CS3

    I am about to purchase a new Mac Pro and am curious which video card to buy - particularly when it comes to rendering speed.
    Apple offers the ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT with 256MB of GDDR3 as a standard option, with the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT with 512MB of GDDR3 as a $150 BTO option.
    I primarily use AE CS3 using adaptive resolution in lieu of Open GL. The projects are very 3d intensive. My initial thought is that the NVIDIA card has more VRAM and would be a better pick - but would my $$$ be better off toward more RAM? Does using CS4 make a difference?
    Any thoughts would be appreciated. And yes, I have searched the forums but have not found anything definitive.

    Personally, I'd buy more RAM. The standard display card supplied with the Mac Pro will have perfectly good specs for AE and Prem Pro.
    Yes, CS4 should render faster than CS3.

  • Which video card is best to preview in 2 monitor

    hello all,
    please I need help with video card and advice me with which video card shall I buy for this system I have.
    I also need to preview 2 monitor in adobe after effect and adobe preimere. like i need to work with timeline and the secound monitor i get preview the video.
    My system:
    GIGABYTE Motherboard P35-DS3R
    processor intel core 2 Qaud
    8 GB DDR2 Ram
    SATA hard drive 500 GB
    thank you very much
    best regards,
    imam

    I like the ATI 4890
    make sure you have 2 slots open since it wide.
    And it has: OpenGL 3.0 support
    One more space to get that hot air out.
    Also:
    500 Watt or greater power supply with two 75W 6-pin PCI Express® power connectors recommended (600 Watt and four 6-pin connectors for ATI CrossFireX™ technology in dual mode)
    make sure you have 2 power connectors to run the dual monitors:
    Glenn
    Message was edited by: poweredbydeign

  • Which Video Card??

    I am sure this has been asked many times, but I could not find previous discussions regarding my question:
    I will be ordering a new iMac soon. I plan on purchasing the 2.93 or 3.06 - leaning towards the 3.06 just to get the most I can afford. 1 TB HD. 4 GB RAM (moving to 8 GB when I can afford).
    Here is my question:
    What video card to choose: the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 512MB OR the ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB
    I mainly do:
    photo editing using PhotoShop CS4, Lightroom, Aperture, Bridge.
    HD video editing: Final Cut Express (moving to Studio soon), and I might eventually try 3D editing.
    I rarely game, but might more in the future.
    Thanks in advance for any advice, recommendations, etc!!
    And if you need more info to determine which card would fit my needs better, let me know!
    rob

    Look at the data.
    http://www.MarketingTactics.com/Speedmark/
    See Barefeats.com
    http://www.barefeats.com/imac09.html
    http://www.barefeats.com/imac09b.html
    http://www.barefeats.com/imac09c.html
    http://www.barefeats.com/imac09d.html

  • I have an older Power Mac G5 Quad, and my video card just went out. I am trying to find a video card that will work for my Power Mac. I have duel screens but I can't seem to find the appropriate video card

    I have an older Power Mac G5 Quad, and my video card just went out. I am trying to find a video card that will work for my Power Mac. I have duel screens but I can't seem to find the appropriate video card. The serial number on my computer is: RM620603R6W. Apple won't help me because the computer is older than suggested. Please give me the exact video card that will work best for my computer.

    Hi Mike, make sure the card has Mac ROM, or is a PC card with Mac ROMs flashed to it...
    G5 PCIe options are listed here:
    http://www.jcsenterprises.com/Japamacs_Page/Blog/71BBF3EF-9713-4C53-8B80-26771F8 A4087.html

  • Virtualbox on windows host: which video driver to choose ?

    Hello all:
    i have installed archlinux on my vista box through vbox
    well next step is to install X
    but i dont know which video driver to choose
    when i do lspci |grep VGA
    i get
    VGA compatible controller: InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH VirtualBox ...
    so which driver does this correspond ?
    my laptop has a ATI card

    thanks but can you tell me how to install that guest additions ?
    i noticed there's a menu item for that
    but nothing happens when i click it

  • I have an early MiniMac with OS X 10.4.11.  Can I get a free OS upgrade and which version should I choose?  Do I just download and over ride the current OS system or what?

    I have an early MiniMac with OS X 10.4.11.  Can I get a free OS upgrade and which version should I choose?  Do I just download and over ride the current OS system or what?

    First what model Mini do you have? That will determine how high y can go.
    How to identify Mac mini models
    In any event you will have to pay

  • Mac pro 8 core 3.1 randomly freezes after video card upgrade

    Hi,
    I just installed an ATI 5770 as a video card upgrade, plugged my new LED cinema display 27 and everything seems to work fine.
    Sometimes though, while working with Aperture I noticed the Mac Pro just freezes, although the mouse works, I cannot do anything and I'm forced to press and hold the power button for a reboot.
    This happended randomly 5 or 6 times in a couple of weeks and only while working with Aperture.
    Any thoughts? Anyone having the same issue?
    Thanks for your reply.
    Guido

    Running Lion or SL?
    Tried holding Shift key down and do a safe boot after those freezes.
    Use Disk Utility from another boot media to repair your drive.
    Do you have enough RAM? is Aperture library on non-boot drive? Does it have 30% or more free? more is better. Same for the boot drive which sholdk be small and 50% free.
    Corrupt library. Corrupt preferences (if there were none before, there likely are now after those hard restarts, to data files and to the disk directories).

  • Which video card for Aperture and dual monitors?

    I have a G5 dual 2.0 with a GeForce FX 5200 video card that is driving one 23" Cinema display. I need to upgrade my card per the specs to run Aperture. I have also been thinking of getting a second 23" display. Can someone recommend the best video card for me. I know very little about video cards and have been reading a lot this morning. Thanks,
    Dave

    Hi Dave;
    No. PCIx and PCIe or PCI Express are not the same thing.
    PCIx is an extended or slight sped up version of PCI. While PCIe is a switched bus structure instead.
    Hence they are not the same. That is what all of the big news is about Apple has made the leap over to PCI Express.
    Allan

  • Can anyone recommend an OS and/or video card upgrade?

    Dear experienced video editors!:
    I am currently trying to send a 1080p (Pro Res 422-encoded) Final Cut Pro 6 sequence to Motion 3 to do some effects work and the following message (from Motion 3) arose when I tried the "Send to Motion" command:
    "This project is too large to render with these settings.  Your hardware cannot support a project of this size.  Try reducing the resolution of the project."
    My questions for anyone able to help me are:  What 'settings' are they referring to?  Which 'hardware' cannot support my project, exactly? and What can I do to do my effects work in Motion 3 without reducing the resolution? 
    I have an early 2007 model Mac Pro desktop with the following specs...
    2 X 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
    Mac OS X (ver 10.5.8)
    6 GB 800 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM memory
    ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT graphics card
    The footage I am editing was shot with a Canon T3i at 24p at 1920x1080 res.  Before bringing the footage into Final Cut Pro 6, it was transcoded from H.264 to Pro Res 422.
    Any advice is appreciated!
    Shaun M

    Hi Shaun, here's some video card choices, but check which Mac Pro they work on, might even ask OWC for Motion details...
    http://eshop.macsales.com/Search/Search.cfm?Ntk=Primary&Ns=P_Popularity|1&Ne=5000&N=7418&Ntt=video+cards

  • Which Video Card for MDD - Nvidia or ATi Radeon?

    Mac nVidia GeForce 4 Ti 4600/Ti4600 128MB Video Card G4
    BRAND NEW
    I saw this item on eBay, and it looks like a good deal, but elsewhere on this forum someone said the ATI Radeon 9800 Pro was preferred for the Mirror Drive Door model.
    The NVidia seems to have the best price. Assuming either are compatible (need AGP) which would be recommended, and why?
    My present card is 64MB. I would hope that one with 128MB would improve performance with my Final Cut Express and 3D programs, such as Carrara and SketchUp, and give better results with an LCD monitor (and the card supports dual monitors, I think)
    many thanks,
    K.

    Hi Keith-
    The biggest problem with the Geforce4 Ti is lack of Core Image support. This is of major importance in OS X, important to some graphics/video editing applications and is indicative of a GPU that is more powerful than the cards that don't support Core Image.
    The Radeon 9800 Pro is a card that supports Core Image, and does so with ease.
    For applications, Quartz Extreme is a given, but Open GL is also of concern. The Radeon 9800 Pro scores higher in Open GL benchmarks than the Geforce4 Ti.
    As for 3D, shaders are of importance. The Radeon cards often offer better shader support than the Geforce cards. This is true when comparing the Geforce4 Ti and the Radeon 9800 Pro.
    Not only is the architecture of the Radeon 9800 Pro better, 8 pixel pipelines vs. 4, but the drivers for the Radeon are superior. In fact, it is a gamers secret in some applications, to use Radeon shader drivers to get better performance out of their Geforce cards.
    Not to be overlooked, but the amount of VRAM is not as important as the GPU clock speed, and the memory (VRAM) speed. The Geforce4 Ti has a GPU of 300mhz, and DDR VRAM at 325mhz (effective 650mhz).
    The Radeon 9800 Pro has a GPU clocked at 378mhz, and DDR VRAM clocked at 337.5mhz (effective 675mhz).
    Again, the Radeon 9800 Pro is superior in architecture.
    Both cards can support dual displays, both having a DVI and a VGA port. A big difference is if you use OS X Leopard. Again, the Radeon card stands supreme, with many OS 9, or "legacy" Geforce cards loosing dual display ability in Leopard. This problem is often reported here.
    If, however, the majority of your work is in OS 9, the Geforce4 Ti is a better card, with better native support +in OS 9+. The Radeon 9800 Pro came much later than the last OS 9.2.2, so it doesn't have the benefit of native 3D drivers. It works fine as a basic graphics card in OS 9, but doesn't support accelerated 3D as well as the Geforce4 Ti.
    As for price, since we're comparing flashed cards, the Radeon 9800 Pro costs the same (as the Geforce4 Ti) from a very competent, reliable seller, though you have an extra $10 in shipping.

  • VFX Workstation: Which Video Card to get? GTX680 or Quadro4000?

    May I have some advice on Video Cards for my dual Xeon-E5 workstation?
    PC Specs:  SR-X Classified Mobo. Dual Xeon E5-2670 (32 simulated cores at 3.1Ghz Turbo)
    64GB memory, 4x 2TBCavBlacks in raid 0 (one raid0 for Content Drive, another raid0 for Render Drive)
    and 2x SSDs (one for OS, another for scratch or Apps)
    Main App: AE CS6 / Secondary: Premiere Pro CS6 / Want to Practice: Cinema4D 
    GTX 680
    Pros: 4GB Memory. 1500 cuda cores & Certified for AE CS6 by Adobe.
    Cons: Premiere CS6 has not certified it... yet. 
    Quadro 4000.
    Pros: Comparable performance to the GTX 680 + Certified Pro Card. Allegedly has cleaner performance. i.e. when GPU memory fills up on GTX it can get mad sluggish.
    Cons: Hasn't been updated in 3 years. 1/6th of the Cuda (256 cores). 1/2 the memory (2gb). Twice the Price.
    All specs considered...  I'm inclined towards a single GTX 680 (upgrade to SLI in future).
    Any practical advice on which route to go based on my Main Apps? Which has performed better in your experience?
    PS: Keep in mind, currently using 7D footage in .264, requiring conversions etc. Eventually will switch over to BlackMagicCinema 4K footage primarily.
    PSS: Budget is getting somewhat tight. Rather keep it between $500 and $1000. Not much cash left after all the expenditures so far - I wanted to focus my budget on mobo/chips/memory first. Figured by around Black Friday is a good time to snag a Video Card? or are these not likely to get price cuts?
    Thanks in advance!

    Upon further research, I'm feeling like the best option would be to save my money for a Quadro K5000 when it (hopefully) releases on PC eventually (MacPro Exclusive right now it seems).
    In the meanwhile, maybe I'll just nab one or two super cheap  GTX 580 on Black Friday (which are certified for AFX and Premiere Pro apparently)
    Opinions and considerations?

  • G5 Quad and dual video card question

    I purchased the Quad with the 7800 GT..I originally had 2 monitors on the one card. In doing so you are splitting the Vram into 125 meg per monitor..I don't want that since my CGI demands require more screen redraw from my working monitor..so I purchased another card for my pallet monitor..the 6600LE but some (core image effect not sure) don't work..i.e...the ripple effect
    is there something about the 6600 LE that doesn't allow all of apples desktop eyecandy to work?
    G5 Quad   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    That's interesting. The 6600 should support core image and everything else that it needs to. That's one of the cards Apple ships with the G5s. You have the 6600 in the eight lane slot right?
    Perhaps it is something screwy with the way multiple video cards are handled?
    If you want to try an experiment you could swap the 7800 and the 6600. Put the 6600 into the 16 lane slot and put the 7800 in the 8 lane slot. See if the 7800 then won't show the ripple effect.

  • [Solved] Well-supported and powerful video card?

    I'm sick of dealing with Catalyst updates breaking my system and crashing Starcraft 2, so I'm thinking I'll buy a new card for my rig. I want to get something that'll work better and make my life easier.
    So I'm looking for a desktop (PCI-e) video card, probably nVidia, that can replace my current Radeon HD 5770. I'd like something relatively quiet and not too power-greedy (this PC is right next to my bed and on 24/7) but powerful enough to support my two monitors, play back 1080P h.264 easily, and do some occasional gaming, the most extreme of which would be SC2 in WINE (I don't need to max out the settings, but a good framerate with more-than-minimum settings would be nice.)
    My price range is flexible. Maybe around $200, preferably less, but I'd spend a bit more if it's justified.
    So: what are you guys using that's working well for you? Anyone have any recommendations on what card to buy?
    EDIT: I ended up getting a GTX 460. It's everything I wanted - quiet, powerful, good driver support. Well, I haven't confirmed yet that Starcraft 2 runs without crashing (as it had a habit of doing under my 5770) but at least it runs unlike under the most recent ATI drivers.
    Last edited by mDuo13 (2010-09-10 04:46:14)

    My card (the aforementioned GTX 460) arrived. I installed it today with no hitches. Everything worked great except it took me a couple tries to get Starcraft 2 to run (it initially crashed because it couldn't resize my Twinview desktop). I fixed it by creating a Metamode in the nvidia-settings utility where I turned my secondary monitor to "Off". Just switch metamodes, open SC2, and switch metamodes again when done. I may come up with an even simpler solution eventually, but in general, I'm super-happy with how effortless it was getting everything installed, set up, and configured.
    And as to the comments on the size of the card - this card is not small at 9.5" or something, but that's comparable to the 5770 I had before and like I said, my case is HUGE. I had like 6 inches to spare behind the card. XD That said, people with ordinary cases probably should measure.
    Last edited by mDuo13 (2010-09-10 04:51:08)

Maybe you are looking for

  • Share Data between Pro and Designer Form

    Good evening, Old Form: I recently inherited an adobe pro form created a few years ago. The naming conventions are horrible, and they refuse to replace the form to spit out an xml file. But they want the data to fill into an access database. New Form

  • JBoss 4.2.0 does not contain need folders and files inside default server

    Dear, In the Virtual Appliance you provided, you will find under the /home/livecycle/jboss-4.2.0/server/default ONLY: log folder and tmp folder. When you start jboss like: ~jboss4.2.0/bin>./run.sh -c default It will give this error: Failed to boot JB

  • Why do my music files show as MPEG 4 in Itunes

    Why do my music files show as MPEG 4 in Itunes

  • Rename oledb command parameters

    Hi i am updating nearly 200 columns in oledb command.but it is showing param_0,1,2,3, etc i want makes sure those are not mis matched ,can i rename param0 as customer id Please urgent thanks in advance ADKR

  • Folder action plug in not working

    Hi, Using Automator I created a workflow that filters .avi files, then opens tubitunes to convert them to .m4v When I run a test it works perfectly, but when I save it as a plug-in to the folder and drop an item in that folder, nothing happens. any h