4 ETQ399 ... current release too low ( 2002_1_31I)

HI,
I am running an upgrade in modus PREPARE from 4.6C to ECC 6.0 and I get the message that: current release too low (< 2002_1_31I).
I downloded the Add-Ons 2002_1_46C (SAPKIND76A).
I extract it to \usr\sap\trans\EPS and the file is ...\EPS\bin
I logon to the the system and uploaded it and I see it is installable.
Problem: When I want to install it the system tells its already installed.
Why I see it its installable? Why PREPARE ask for it when its installable?
ADDONCHK.LOG is:
................................................................1 ETQ201XEntering upgrade-phase "ADDON_CHK" ("20080915234114")
2 ETQ367 Connect variables are set for standard instance access
4 ETQ399 System-nr = '00', GwService = 'sapgw00'
4 ETQ399 Environment variables:
4 ETQ399 dbs_ora_schema=SAPSR3
4 ETQ399 auth_shadow_upgrade=0
4 ETQ399 Range check for Add-on CA-JVA 462 ...
4 ETQ399 ... current release within range (41B - 462)
4 ETQ399 ... ==>> OK
4 ETQ399 Range check for Add-on PI 2001_2_46C ...
4 ETQ399 ... current release too low (< 2002_1_31I)
4 ETQ399 ... ==>> TOO LOW
4 ETQ399 Range check for Add-on SAP_NOTES 46C ...
4 ETQ399 ... Add-on not ranged
4 ETQ399 ... ==>> OK
4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20080915234114
Any Idea?
Thanks in advance
HanseAtik

Hi Markus,
All I have now is:
PI                    PI 2001_2_46C Installation
                        SAPKIPZE41    imported
                        SAPKIPZE42    imported
                        SAPKIPZE43    imported
                        SAPKIPZE44    imported
                        SAPKIPZE45    imported
                        SAPKIPZE46    imported
                        SAPKIPZF41    not imported
                        SAPKIPZF42    not imported
                        SAPKIPZF43    not imported
                        SAPKIPZF44    not imported
                        SAPKIPZG41    not imported
                        SAPKIPZG42    not imported
                        SAPKIPZG43    not imported
                        SAPKIPZG44    not imported
                        SAPKIPZG45    not imported
And the upgrade says:
The version 2001_2_46C of the Add-on PI is too low for this upgrade (< 2002_1_31I).
You need to upgrade the Add-on first before you can proceed with PREPARE.
Thanks in advance.
HanseAtik

Similar Messages

Warning: PROCESSES may be too low for current load

Hello,
I have 64 bit centOS Server and have oracle 10g installed on it.
We have 8GB RAM and 64 bit Server but we were able to install oracle on 2GB SGA only.
From few days I am facing following error:
Warning: PROCESSES may be too low for current load
shared servers=114, want 8 more but starting only 1 more
Warning: PROCESSES may be too low for current load
shared servers=114, want 8 more but starting only 1 more
Warning: PROCESSES may be too low for current load
shared servers=115, want 8 more but starting only 0 more
I have executed following commands:
ALTER SYSTEM SET max_shared_servers=200 SCOPE=MEMORY;
ALTER SYSTEM SET circuits=300 SCOPE=MEMORY;
But I am still getting the same error,and server average load goes too high and needs a oracle restart.
Please let me know in case any one has solution for this problem. Its urgent.
Thanks in Advance.

Sir ,
please see the output of the below query .
this error had found today early morning when rman backup get start .
SQL> show parameter process
NAME TYPE VALUE
aq_tm_processes integer 0
db_writer_processes integer 1
gcs_server_processes integer 0
job_queue_processes integer 10
log_archive_max_processes integer 2
processes integer 500
SQL> select count(*) from v$process;
COUNT(*)
93
SQL> select count(*) from v$session;
COUNT(*)
94
the error msg in the alert log file is
Warning: PROCESSES may be too low for current load
shared servers=1, want 1172 more but starting only 405 more
Edited by: user9353210 on Jan 4, 2011 9:30 PM

X-fi Xtreme Music soundcard PROBLEM: Microphone volume too low(unusab

Hello, I've spent a while?sifting through these forums and?can't find any solution to this problem. Many people have been asking this same question and?aren't getting any solutions. When I say the microphone is?too low, I mean it's at the lowest possible volume it could?run at,?so it's unusable and?might as well not be functioning at all. Keep in mind every volume setting on the computer has been set to max.
Is their anyone?that?owns a X-fi xtreme music sound card?using a?microphone that does work?If so, what microphone are you using?I'm only?suggesting that theirs some odd settings with this card that only allow a certain kind of microphone to work with it. I'm using an old mic that works perfectly with my sb li've and that I've had for 3 years now. I'll echo the same basic details I've already checked over. They can be found in other customers' posts who are having this?same problem.) Microphone works - tested on other systems and other cards2) Microphone volume is on max - both in recording and playback (although playback is muted)3) Gain is enabled - Ticked +20dB box4) Drivers are current - tried shipped drivers, current stable, and beta release?Here are more links to this problem, which has not been solved yet:
http://forums.creative.com/creativel...ssage.id=49623
http://forums.creative.com/creativel...id=29980#M4984
I?suspect no one?has?the answer to this problem?yet. But could someone please tell me if they are using this soundcard with a mic that is working. If so please tell me what microphone you are using.

I don't know if this is the latest thread but it seems to be. Obviously this is a big prob for a lot of pee
ps.
I have Just built a new machine and included a X-Fi Extreme audio for the 8 channel sound capabilities for movie viewing etc, but .. I also run Teamspeak servers for several games ( WoW , UT , CS etc) and find myself unable to communicate using said card. problem is mic boost is available in playback mode but not in record mode. If you activate mic boost in playback it does actually increase volume in output mode also (don't ask me why) ...but not by much . Not enough for peeps on the other end to hear you while gaming. So... if you can boost mic on playback , why not on record ? which is where it is suposed to be in the first place. there are a LOT of frustrated gamers out there that have paid good money for the surround experience but are unable to do what previous cards have done well .... and that is allow communication between players . please don't ignore this as this is not an operating system problem.... i have installed this card on Vista and XP (both X64 and 32)? and still no mic boost from the software available. you know the problem .. at least acknowledge it and give an update. thank you?Fly

Volume too low on album purchased on iTunes

I purchased an album on iTunes and when I burn to CD the volume is too low. I have done all suggest things to "enhance" the sound. All other items I have purchased are fine. It just seems to be this one album. Any suggestions. Is there a way to "repurchase-download" without paying.
Jenean

Craw4dm,
If you go to iTunes menu, select preferences and click on "playback" button you'll see a check box called "sound check". This enables the computer to adjust the volume of each track so that they all sound similar in volume. So no, you don't have to go through each track! Its a global setting of your music player.
I have it switched off at all times. I also have sound enhancer switched off at all times.
These features have no effect on volume (or anything for that matter) when you burn CD's.
As to the original poster, if the CD sounds quiet then that is how its supposed to be. If buy the CD in the shops it will sound the same. Note that there is big trend at the moment to make albums sound very loud using special processing at the mastering stage (when audio is prepared for album release). It is a trend that most "audiophiles" (or IMHO anyone with ears!) detest. Look up "loudness wars" or similar, on google.
Indeed the "sound check" facility in itunes is there to counteract the fact that CD's sound different in volume - a fact that is made all the worse by the record company practise I have just outlined!
I suspect the "quiet CD" just sounds more like it should do and its being compared to a CD thats been mastered overly loud.

Microphone level too low

It seems like the microphone input level on my wife's iPhone 4 is too low. People have trouble hearing her during her calls. Using the headset, speakerphone, or Bluetooth doesn't increase the volume, nor does covering up the noise-cancelling input on the top.
Using the voice recorder app, I used the same headset the same distance from my mouth to compare the meter volume against my 1st gen iPhone, and the input comes in at least 6dB lower.
Is this a defective model that needs to be returned? Or is this expected as part of the new design? My wife says she can't use it as a phone, it may have to go back.
It would be great if a future iOS update allowed us to adjust the input level.

My wife's iPhone 4 has the same problem concerning the person that she is talking to can't hear her very well at all. It sounds like she is down in a well or the microphone is far away from her mouth.
We have confirmed that signal strength does not appear to be an issue as it does the same thing with 2 bars or 4 bars. I have had her call me on my office landline, so we don't have the issue of two cell phones to cloud the issue.
She also has one of the vinyl or silicon covers that AT&T sold us the day we bought the phone.
She is right-handed, so some of the issues mentioned concerning problems covering up the antenna by left-handers is not a factor.
We are on the latest software revision - v4.0.1 (I believe that was the release we download to iTunes and installed onto her iPhone 4.
The only thing else we have noticed is that the volume of her call approaches a normal level after about 30 seconds into the call.

Headset volume too low

I just bought an iphone for wife, she said the earphone volume is too low, I have set the volume to max, any idea? Thanks Alex

The volume issue WAS a problem. Apple fixed it for most people a number of software releases ago. Most of the volume complaints stopped a long time ago after the fix. Now, with the 3G iphone, my volume is very loud and much better than even the fixed first version iphone. I think if you read the many initial reviews of the 3G version, most mentioned how much better the handset, speaker and speakerphone quality and loudness is. I know this is not solace for someone with a problem now, but I don't think it is widespread. You could just have a defective phone. Take it in the Apple Genius bar and see if they will get you a new one.

Sound Recorded Too Low

Hoping someone can help!
On my recent shoot, the recording volume settings were too low (I think) and after capturing to FCP the average reading is around -50 and peaking at -12.
Even upping the sound bar by the max 12dB isn't enough really to repair it. I'm a pretty basic user of FCP so don't know a lot of the technical stuff. I have Soundtrack Pro and don't know if that can help me as I don't know how to use it.
Any help would be hugely appreciated folks as stand to lose an awful lot of material..
Thanks!

The quick solution is to double your audio tracks
The quickest way to do that is to hold down the Option key while dragging the audio clip to a new track ... before releasing the clip, press the Shift key (while still holding down the Option key). This will create a duplicate clip in perfect sync with the original clip.
You can also use the Dynamic Processor filter to add more gain.
-DH

Photo print at too low of a quality

Hi
I am trying to make a book, and have all my pictures set, but since they are from the computer and not my personal pictures, they each have that yellow warning that says photo may print at too low of a quality. I am wondering if Mac can change it, since I don't want to spend the money to have the book printed with blurry pictures. They are all zoomed out the most they can be, and I tried everything else.. PLEASE HELLLLP! email me at [email protected]
Thanks

sgatling:
Welcome to the Apple Discussions. What are the pixel dimensions of the photos you're using? Which theme are you using and which frames do you get the warning sign, i.e. full page layout, 2 photos per page, etc.
iPhoto will give that warning when the dpi of a picture in a particular frame is below 180 dpi. So for a full page photo you'd need pixel dimensions of about 1600 x 2070 or greater to avoid the warning flag.
Unless the photo is way below that minimum size I don't think it will be significant enough to be objectionable. But that's just based on my experience. No matter what size you use the photo will not be as sharp as you can get by printing them yourself on glossy photo paper at equivalent sizes.
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 08 libraries and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

Help needed to install Flash Player : 'Non-Current Release' problem!

I been encountering problems while trying to install Flash Player on my laptop running Windows 7.
Originally Flash Player does not work as I understand it is not supported on 64-bit Internet Explorer.
After installing 32-bit IE, the following issue of 'non-latest version' arises and all installation were aborted by the application :
The below were steps I had taken to no success.
1. Via the 32-bit browser, downloaded flash player un-install program and did the uninstallation with success.
2. Rebooted the laptop.
3. Via the 32-bit browser, downloaded the flash player version 10.0.45.2 from http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer.
4. After downloading it automatically did the installation with 100% completion.
5. The program proceeded to activate the flash player with a webpage saying if the flash player is working properly, I should see a video and Flash Player's logo.
6. Before anything was displayed, an error message popped up to say I was trying to install a non-current version and that I should go to same webpage to download the latest version. The activation was then aborted.
Tried many times but always encountered same problem and hence cannot proceed to use the flash player.
Need assistance to diagnose the problem and to get Flash Player working on my laptop. Appreciate any help to get it working.
Regards.

Thanks to efforts of eidnolb and Bob, the installation of flash player into my laptop is now working .
Bob's installer enabled the download successfully.
Eidnolb's link in post 6 trigggered me that I may have previously installed the pre-release version 10.1, thereby leading to the 'non-current-version' problem too. Post in that link adviced to uninstall 10.1 using the pre-release uninstaller.
I suggest others who had encountered this non-current release to uninstall first using that specific uninstaller, before attempting to install the most current release. I may have installed the 10.1 pre-release in desperation after failing numerous times trying to figure out why flash player does not install in browser not knowing its currently-non-support of 64-bit browser.
Once again thanks for support, eidnolb and Bob.
Cheers.
Kelvin

Radio(FM) sound is too low comapred to music playe...

hi
have anybody has ame problem..
"Radio(FM) sound is too low comapred to music played on phone"
the phone has strong speakers which which are loud enough but when you play Radio(FM) the volume is too low.
any suggestions on this

I`m totally agree with you kklot, volume level of 5530 xpressMUSIC (?) is a shame ... despite the terrible quality earphones provided with this model.
I feel cheated by nokia, i bought an XPRESS MUSIC because of my great love for music ... but i cant access my music from earphones, cant rewind or change a song .. (!)
I really hope Nokia release a firmware improving
* a higher volume level ......... ----> URGENT ....!!!
* bugs related to listening music meanwhile you try to do basics like answering a call !!
why the phone has to freeze or restart??
I had always used Samsung, ok, no symbian but great, powerful and rich sound..
i`m regreting right now about this nokia cell ....
...by the way, i cant access youyube, maybe someone can help me? is it possible? i didnt find any app for 5530.

Volume level too low on SoundBlaster X-Fi Extreme Au

[size="2" face="Helv">?I installed a SoundBlaster X-Fi Extreme Audio in the new higher-end system that I just got. It's a Intel Core2 Duo with plenty of dual memory on a fast bus; the 700W PS is currently only driving the base system and one Radeon 2600XT, so there should not be a power problem. I've disabled the?motherboard sound components. It's running Vista32 and I've (cleaned and) updated every driver possible. I've been through all the Knowledge Base and Forums, and have?checked out most everything that seemed potentially applicable.
?The main problem is that the volume is really too low. Even though I have every output setting at 00, the sound is just audible. I am configured only for 2. output. This is true whether I direct the output through headphones or into my analog home stereo (to get listenable levels, I have to take the gain to about 3x of any other component and get the expected associated hum from doing so); the same is true if I direct through digital system connections for HDMI to my HP w22087h monitor (also set at max)?or to my LCD TV.
?Whether part of the problem, or a result of having all the volume settings max'd, there is often a moderate 'pop' when output is started and there seems to me a "ramp up" in the volume (only about a second in length) that keep me from hearing?some of the shorter Windows 'systems sounds'. I hate to be a bother (I readily admit to not being an expert on any of this), but the loudest sound these days is from banging my head against the wall trying to fix this problem. ;-)
Thanks

When you play music from iTunes can you play it at full volulme? If so, it is not the MBP it is either something to do with the MP4 player (what are you using for that) or the conversion.

SAP Offline Player - Screen Resolution is too low

I have a customer that has the SAP offline player 6.02_5 and is working from two monitors. He appears to have his monitors configured identical from my dual monitor setup in which I have no issues but he is getting a pop-up that reads:
This computer does NOT meet the minimum requirements (Current 1024x640/ Required 1024x768+) Your screen resolution is too low.
Could this possibly be a video card issue? Everytime that he tried to launch the SAP Offline Player the message above pops up on the users pc. Any ideas?
Your response is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Matt
Edited by: Matt Marion on Aug 14, 2009 4:29 PM

One person reported he found an app with a simular problem. Unfortunatly there is no real fix. Yell at the maker of the app for not supporting something as basic and trivial as 720p.

Vibrating intensity too low for BB Z10

Hi Team,
Any idea on how to increase vibrating intensity for BB Z10 ?
Currently the vibrating intensity is too low to feel and missing the calls.
OS: 10.0.10.90
Thanks,
Ravindra Dolas

I don't think there is a way to increase the intensity or the number of vibrations on the Z10; another failure by the developers of taking away existing functionality.

How to block an order if the price is too low?

Hello,
My problem is :
How to block an order if the price is too low?
I created a new type of condition ZMIN and an access by material.
When the net price is below the minimum price the system must position the order on incomplete document for error of price.
Thank you in advance.
Frédéric Blaise
e-Kenz S.A.

Hello,
you can enter a lower limit in the condition record:
Lower limit of the condition rate/amount
Indicates whether, during document processing, the system checks if manual changes fall short of the lower limit allowed for the corresponding condition record.
Use
When you maintain the scales in a condition record, the system checks whether the scale value falls below the lower limit.
Or you can use the flag 'conditon update'.
Condition update
Controls whether limit values are relevant for pricing.
E.g.: you can make the use of a particular condition record in the document dependent on a specified total value.
This total value can be specified in the condition record.
I hope that the information are helpful.
With best regards
Claudia Neudeck

Price too low - Invoice is not blocked...

Dear,
Probably you all know that invoices can be automatically blocked for payment based on the tolerances set up in customizing. When the price is too high, the system acts like expected, but when the price is too low, we don't get the preferred result. You get a warning message, but no payment block. It would be nice if the invoices with a "price too low" are blocked too.
We don't like to park them, because we work with a scanning procedure, so all invoices have to be posted immediately in the finance department, otherwhise it's very difficult to follow - up...
The purchasing and stock department are solving all the issues (qty and price differences) based on the list in MRBR. If the invoices with incorrect contracts are not in the list, this can give some problems. I've asked the finance people to block the invoices with a lower price manually, but for them this way of working is a little bit annoying...
Does anyone know how to solve this problem? Is there a BADI or user exit (or customizing parameter)?
Thanks in advance!
Kind Regards,
Lien

Please note the following:
The system will check the lower tolerance limit but an invoice will
never be blocked if the LOWER limit is exceeded. The system will only
display a warning message. In the standard system invoices will only be
blocked if the UPPER limit is exceeded because normally one wants to
prevent to pay more than expected.
In SAP Library: MM-Invoice with Variances-Tolerances you will also
find the following explanation:
".. If the variance is outside the tolerance limit, the system displays
this in a warning message. If you do not adjust your entries, you can
still post the invoice. If, however, the upper tolerance limit is
exceeded, the system automatically blocks the invoice for payment."
If this is an issue, message M8084 and M8085 can be customized as
error messages, as a work around. Please transaction OMRM
(spro -> materials management -> logistics invoice verification ->
Define attributes of system messages here you can set message 084 to
error)
You may also want to see the user exit exit_saplkont_002,
enhancement MM08R002 for blocking.
I hope this information will answer your query.

4 ETQ399 ... current release too low ( 2002_1_31I)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for