400 & 800 displays

Are 400 & 800 displays interchangable?

Hi, cpoul. The experience of users posting here has been varied, and it's generally impossible to gauge how much of the variation has to do with their own differing levels of care and expertise. For the most knowledgeable advice, put the question to one or more (or all) of the following Powerbook parts vendors:
http://www.pbparts.com (parts and repair work)
http://www.dttservice.com (parts and repair work)
http://www.powerbookresq.com (parts and repair work)
http://www.powerbookmedic.com (parts and repair work)
http://www.tekserve.com (parts and repair work)
http://www.ifixit.com (parts and excellent, illustrated online take-apart instructions)
Find phone numbers on their web sites.

Similar Messages

  • Is a WD My Book Studio Desktop 3TB Hard Drive - FW 400/800, USB 2.0, Apple Time Machine Ready external hard drive bootable with my Powerbook G4 12" PPC 10.5.8?

    Sirs or madams,
    Is my Powerbook G4 12” PPC 10.5.8 'bootable' with a Western Digital My Book Studio Desktop 3TB Hard Drive - FW 400/800, USB 2.0, Apple Time Machine Ready external hard drive? Western Digital says officially no, but that it MIGHT be. I primarily live in China and bought a datastorage.com.cn Clearlight s400+ external hard drive enclosure with a 320GB disk drive a few years ago in China. My computer 'boots' fine from it, but since I got it in China all the paperwork, etc. is in Chinese; my Chinese isn't quite sufficient enough yet to read it. But there are references to something called "SATA", whatever that is.
    My level of computer 'under the hood' knowledge is extremely low. I've been told that SATA has some relationship as to whether or not an external hard drive will boot a computer via the Firewire connection, something relating to 'interface', which I assume is how separate electronic gadgets work, or don't work, with each other.
    I frankly don't care much for computers, the internet, or their related gadgets such as all these fancy phones. I longingly reminisce about the days when there were no such things. I use a computer & the internet because I have to, and unfortunately unlike a car where one doesn't have to have 'under the hood' knowledge to operate it, just knowledge of the steering wheel, brake, gas, etc., one seemingly must know a ridiculously great amount of 'under the hood' knowledge, including jargon, to operate computers.
    So, please try to respond accordingly; thank you.
    If this particular external hard drive won't, for certain, be bootable with my computer, can you advise as to what readily available brand/model would be in the 3TB range for a similar price, roughly $150ish??
    Thank you very much.

    Mr. BGreg,
    Thank you very much. "...under the covers...". I think you meant "under the hood", as in a car. I suppose "under the covers" would be man/woman interfacing, which I am familiar with!
    Actually, I'm back in the US now for a few months. I looked at the OWC web site, but only cusorily so far. I'll contact them; they appear knowledgeable about Apple computers.
    As to what you wrote about Western Digital's cases, I certainly wouldn't want a poor case. In China I had over time gotten 3 different external drive cases, 3 different Chinese brands, and separately bought Hitachi brand disk drives that 'simply' plugged into the cases. The drives are roughly 80GB 120GB and 320GB. The two larger ones are in cases that have Firewire plugs/jacks, which are bootable with my computer.
    So my understanding, as you wrote, has been that my Powerbook will boot from an external hard drive, provided it connects via Firewire, and the disk drive itself is 'normally' formatted with however my computer's own disk drive is formatted, (HFS OS extended (journaled) or some such??). So I was left wondering why Western Digital would indicate that even though their such-and-so external hard drive case/drive was Firewire capable, that they would then say it would not be bootable with my Apple PPC computer......
    Well, anyway, since you indicated Western Digital's case quality is suspect, then I'll try OWC and disregard Western Digital.
    Naturally, OWC should be able to address this, but your thoughts are also welcome. You mentioned the OWC cases are good with Apples. Would the disk drives OWC supplied with the cases also be of relatively dependable quality?? From my so far only cursory look at their web site they appear to have various options, including case only options where I could insert my own or their own drives. These sorts of options seem preferable, also along with quality components. 
    My Powerbook has been in use since 2004. In China I put in a 1.25 memory 'chip' in the bottom and installed the 10.5.8 operating system, which I understand are the maximum workable with my Powerbook. When I inquired with Chinese friends if my 1.33 GHz processor could be taken out and a more powerful one put in, they said it wasn't feasible because in my particular computer my processor was, as I recall them saying, soldered/'permanently' connected with the 'motherboard', that it would just be easier to get a new computer.
    I would be with them and they would nonchalantly open it completely up showing me all its tightly arranged 'innards' while at least giving it a good internal dust/dirt clean job for cheap lunch and a beer (& so much dirt/dust/lint there was!)...these are the same folks who build the things of course...fast moving hands with tiny screws flying everywhere, but everything 100% all back in place when finished.
    My Chinese friends also said that nowadays Apples are not as well built as when my Powerbook was built, that nowadays an Apple's life expectancy was considerably lower, so I fear that when I get a new computer that, though it will be more up-to-date and powerful, etc., it most probably won't last near as long as my Powerbook has. They also said that in an older computer the fan was often the first component to go bad, and if a new one couldn't be easily found, as they said was my case, then you're just left with having to get an entirely new computer.  Part of why I dislike electronic computer gadgets generally is that they are obsolete so quickly.
    So, anyway, thanks very much for your information.

  • FireWire 400&800 (IMAC Core2) NOT WORKING after Upgrading to SNOW LEOPARD!

    My FireWire 400&800 (iMAC Core2) are *NOT WORKING* after Upgrading to SNOW LEOPARD!
    Any Solutions?
    Thanks!
    --Frank Strallents
    www.SHOCKPROOFX.com

    I'll try your suggestions....Thanks!
    Recently, I try to Re-install Snow Leopard, unfortunately, still unsuccessful.
    The Mybook Icon only appears if it is connected via USB.
    After using Firewire and getting used to the speed...USB 2.0 is like a Corvette racing a Veyron...lol
    I am not upset on these issues, it is normal for new OS to have these problems...unfortunately, even OSX is not invincible.
    I'm sure Apple/Steve is on every Programers A*s for a solution.
    I still think APPLE'S OSX will still be the future of Operating system!
    For now, still waiting for the patch and hopefully soon.
    Suggestions are still Welcome for a Solutions:-)
    Frank
    SHOCKPROOFX.COM

  • Daisy-Chained G-Tech 400/800 and Mini

    I've got a Mini that I use as my entertainment system (all music, video, TV, etc.)... I use a lot of harddrive space and currently have a G-Tech 500gb Firewire 400/800 drive that has one firewire 400 and two firewire 800 ports. I use this drive to store all my music, movies, TV shows, etc... and a second one to backup my Mini, my media external hard drive, and my MacBook Pro...
    My question is as follows:
    I know that with Firewire I can daisy chain the drives... however, my Mini does not have an 800 port... So, can I do the following without running into problems:
    Mac Mini connected to "Media Drive" via Firewire 400 - connected to "Backup drive" via Firewire 800?
    Basically my question is can some devices in a daisy chain be connected via 400 and others via 800 or does a daisy chain need to remain consistent using only 400 or only 800 throughout?
    Otherwise, I guess I'll just use a hub... though this option rubs me the wrong way for some reason... it seems like I'd be sacrificing something by going through a hub... is this unfounded?
    Mac Mini   Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

    That's what I thought you meant. The issue is whether the drive in the middle has a cross-connection between FW 400 and 800 ports, and that is not likely (though technically possible despite the different specifications).
    I would check with the manufacturer of the drive you intend to use in the middle of the chain to see if there is such a cross-connection on the FW 400 and 800 interfaces, but FW 400 and 800 aren't like USB 1.1 and 2.0 with their backwards compatibility.

  • DVD DL fail to burn AND Firewire 400/800 problems

    I have had several months of intermittent DVD burn fails. Most recently today burning from the finder and it is now reporting "The disc can’t be burned because because communication between the computer and the disc drive failed (error code 0x80020022)."
    That error is new, previously it was always
    Sense Key - Hardware Error
    Sense Code - 0x03
    The first time this cropped up was on 10.5.x and when I reported it to apple they had me take it to get the drive replaced since it was still covered by applecare.
    After the DVD replacement and while still in the shop it burned a few DVD DLs ok. A few weeks later the same 0x03 errors. (it always burns CDs just fine)
    After another phone conversation with applecare, they now suggest that the logic board needs to be replaced. (This was after I mentioned I frequently have problems with Firewire 400 or 800 external drives showing up...sometimes they work sometimes they don't. The same drives always show up when connected via USB)
    I was walked through resetting the PRAM, which cleared up the Firewire 400/800 temporarily, but it did not help the DVD burn problem.
    So on the eve before the appointment, this crazy MBP (2,2, 2.33 ghz) burns a DVD DL after blowing compressed air thru the DVD slot. But the second DVD DL fails to burn with the ""The disc can’t be burned because because communication between the computer and the disc drive failed (error code 0x80020022)."
    I was hoping that the upgrade to 10.6.x would solve both issues, but not so much.
    Anyone else with the DVD DL problem experiencing FW problems?

    The problems with some external FW burners under SL are fairly common, Robert. With some earlier drives (like my Pioneer 109 in an external box) often one can't even "see" the drive at all (though the bridge in the external box will show up under System Profiler) through FW, though it works fine under USB. With some later ones things like PRAM resets, or simply disconnecting and reconnecting the drive, will get them working. See http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=10070281 or some discussion of these issues and possible "workarounds".
    As far as the general disc burning issue goes, other things that are worth considering include problems with a "fullish" hard drive with fragmented free space, and the actual media being used. What brands of DVD have you tried?
    DL discs, generally seem much more finicky about dust and dirt than single layer when it comes to burning (and , of course, need much more free HD space) . Will it burn a single layer DVD or a CD without problems?
    Cheers
    Rod

  • Firewire 400 & 800 not working together

    I have two 800 firewire external drives connected to my Macbook Pro. They're plugged into wall outlets. I also have my DVCAM deck connected via a 400 firewire cable. If the 400 is connected, one or both of the 800s disappears and vice versa. How can I have both the 400 and the 800s connected at the same time? I must have them connected simultaneously.
    Thanks,
    miss2z

    Okay. So, changing the FCP FW device didn't do anything noticeable right now. But I'm keeping it at that setting. I daisychained the old 400/800 drive to the 800 drives, using the 400 cable from my hub, which holds my printer and my deck, and the drive didn't like that--it didn't show up. So I plugged the deck directly into that drive, and voila! all three drives show up, and FCP is recognizing my deck. Great! Now I'm going to find out if there's room for another firewire card in the Macbook Pro. I'll let you know.
    miss2z

  • Migrating from mac pro to mac mini firewire 400 - 800 cant find computer

    hi there
    am trying to use migration assistant to move from old mac pro to new mac mini using firewire 400 - 800 cable but one computer cant see the other - any ideas anyone? have lots of large files so don't want to use wifi
    cheers
    Maria

    Did t d this?
    Make sure both computers are connected via FireWire or ThunderBolt before starting. If you connect the cables after Migration Assistant is already running, the source computer may not be properly detected.
    Restart the source (original) Mac while pressing and holding the "T" key.
    You can use ethernet too:
    Make sure that the source Mac and target Macs are connected to the same network, either wirelessly or via Ethernet. (You can directly connect the two Macs via an Ethernet cable if both are Ethernet capable. To make MacBook Air Ethernet capable, connect using the Apple USB Ethernet Adapter.)
    from:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4889

  • Audio Interfaces for Classical Music, Firewire 400/800?

    In the near future I will be getting a new MacBook or MacBook Pro, and I am looking to record classical music (brass, solo and ensemble, chamber groups, etc). Is getting the Firewire 800 port necessary or recommended for hooking up to a good audio interface? I am a bit confused as to how the bus power works and whether it has to be a 400/800 port.
    I am looking at a MOTU Traveler and a Fireface 800. Any other suggestions?

    I have read and experienced lots of driver issues with the MOTU stuff lately as well as many of others.
    I currently own both a M-Audio Firewire 410 and 1814 both are fantasic interfaces. Both are firewire 400 and bus powered.
    I personally don't see a need for a interface at 800...I have had no problems with my interfaces at 400

  • External Harddrive ethernet vs Firewire 400/800

    What would be better to invest in a ethernet harddrive or a firewire 400/800
    I do need an external harddrive for video editing, mainly 1080i Hi-Def video as I have a Sony HVR A1 and am shooting hi-def.
    Thanks
    Justin
    Durban South Africa

    Firewire 800. Ethernet hard drives are very unlikely to provide an uninterrupted flow of video.
    For what it's worth, your camera records HDV which has the same data rate as DV.
    x

  • Upgrade MultiOrg 10.7 on Tru64 for 400-800 conc users

    I have 8 HP-UX 10.20 servers with Apps 10.7 (no MultiOrg) & RDBMS 7.3.3.x, I am planning to migrate them ?? to one HP Tru64 server with MultiOrg 10.7 & RDBMS 7.3.4 with 400-800 concurrent users.
    My idea is to set 8 different organizations in my MultiOrg 10.7 and a nine organization for GL consolidation purpouses and to handle Corporate AR Receivables Invoices and PO purchase orders. I plan a Master Inventory and subinventorires for each organization in order to receive/shipping from each organization.
    I plan to make operation stress benchmark for testing the 400-800 concurrent users against MultiOrg 10.7 server. My concern is the latency of the network and the waiting time of users (TELNET connections).
    Do you recommend me NCA MultiOrg 10.7?
    UPGRADE TO 11i IS NOT AN OPTION. I really appreciate any hint, comment, white paper, project plan, worksheet, etc?

    I would follow that note
    Apart from that it's impossible to give a recommendation about parameter settings, we don't now anything about your system and the load you have on it.
    Markus

  • WARNING! Firewire 400/800 usage precaution of all Mac mini

    I just found one vital notice about using FireWire 400/800 (IEEE 1394a/b) in any Mac mini. Please be careful and read this notice before you buy any External FireWire 400/800 Hard drive enclosure/paddock.
    I believe in FireWire. FireWire is faster and more stable than USB 2.0/3.0. I love FireWire, but industry these days are terrible poor making its peripheral devices, related chips, etc.
    Beware there are many FireWire devices such as 3.5 inches Hard drive Dock and enclosure they claimed to be used with FireWire 400 or even FireWire 800 with options like USB, eSATA. THESE ARE POOR PCB design and POOR chips inside and even POOR Power Supply, DO NOT BUY or USE THESE so-called FireWire HDD Dock or enclosure, it will hurt your Hard-drive definitely, it will make a lot of BAD-Axle (or bad sector) on your HDD. It's nothing wrong with Mac Mini FireWire Chips, it caused by Third-Parties' poor design and tactless attitude, there are lots of brands out there with the same POOR design and inconsiderate issues there.
    The best way to protect your HDD is put them in a dock-able slot with Active 500W above Powered PC, link with FireWire, no Bad-Sector will occur.
    These are real test and real experience from I myself.
    I have tested lots of brands of 3.5 inches HDDs and docks and enclosures, I just save lots of time for you, if you love your data and your HDD, DO NOT USE THESE DOCK or Enclosure.

    The big problem with those Docks or enclosures has a common poor cause, it's the Power Supply, if your 3.5 inches HDD is plugged in a Good 500W powered PC (Such as the brand Enermax Power Supply), the bad-sector will never happen. But it will happen when you use those Docks or Enclosures even with External Power supply. Because those external power current and voltage are not power enough, they didn't test it fully before putting them in market. They thought it was OK if they can boot up the disk, but they are dead wrong. You can boot a HDD doesn't mean the current and the voltage is power enough, it should have supplied with full power to those Standard 3.5 inches HDD, Seagate, Hitachi, Toshiba, they have rules about how many voltage and current a HDD should be supplied in operating, but those lousy industries didn't consider these rules, they thought just making their products as long as they can boot it up(power up), but the current and voltage is near the minimum level, a normal current and voltage is needed without margin, it should be at least full 5V or 12V, actually, 5V with 0.5A~1A current and 12V with fully 2A current to safely using a single HDD. But they didn't apply those rules.
    You get the picture. When the current and voltage is not power enough, the HDD will sound alarm and make a big noise, then the surface gets hurt badly and it WILL NEVER be RECOVERED by any means of software or hardware.
    When a HDD has a bad sector, it is a very bad for the future usage, because one bad sector could possibly cause another new bad sector and there is NO WAY to prevent this fate and its course, it is the way HDD works, a bad sector is a sign of short-life warning.
    A fully 5.5V with 1A and 12V with 2A current is the most important thing when you decide to use your HDD in an external way by plug the lousy external power supply. NOT to mention those without external power supply, most of them are 2.5 inches USB-powered external HDD.
    Who's to blame? blame to those lousy third-party industries who care nothing but their short term profit strategy. They just don't care about you. As long as a HDD could boot in the first place, they though it will work well. Lame and irresponsible.
    DO NOT take chances to use a lousy External Dock or enclosure. You will regret anyway.
    Put your 3.5 inches HDD into standard PC slot and cable with GOOD powered supply, at least 500 Watt above and the Power Supply must be Active model (expensive but worth).

  • Logic songs won't open or are corrupted - FW 400 - 800 problem!

    Been having all sorts of problems not being able to open songs, or they say they are damaged and when I repair them they're empty.
    Worked out, through trial and error, it had to be a hard drive problem, then realised I'd just changed the cable on the 'song' drive from a 400 - 400 going to a PCI card, to a 400 - 800 going to a built-in port.
    Changed the cable back - problem solved. I would have thought using a built-in port would be better than a PCI one, but clearly not in this instance.
    On a similar topic, I recently fixed a problem where Spectrasonics Stylus RMX wouldn't read my User Library from an external HD formatted as 'case sensitive'. Once re-formatted it worked fine.
    I hope this helps someone.

    Thank you! I ran Windows Update and bam! Problem solved. I would never have thought of it.
    I was missing 320 songs overall! So thanks a lot.

  • MacBook Pro 3,1 - Firewire Bus(ses?), 400 & 800 at the same time

    Hi All,
    I'm using an RME Fireface 800, which is a FW800 audio interface, but I also have a Maxtor FW400 hard drive.
    I know if I daisy-chain the hard drive off the audio interface, then I will drop the bus speed to 400 Mbit/s, but will the same happen if I plug the hard drive into the FW400 port?
    I know if I plug something into the FW400 port on my iMac this happens, so everything there is Firewire 800. Should I aim for the same with my MacBook Pro?
    Cheers,
    Alex

    buy something like this:
    http://www.siig.com/ViewProduct.aspx?pn=NN-EC2012-S1
    they make all different kinds (FW 400, 800, etc.)
    plug your camera in either that adapter or your internal FW port
    plug your FW drive into the other
    capture your video to the EXTERNAL drive.
    edit your footage.
    you don't say what software you are editing in (FCP, iMovie)

  • Firewire 400/800 and Iomega connectivity in the Latest Mac Book Pro?

    Hi,
    I am awiting my Mac Book Pro to arrive. I have no experince with a Mac Book Pro.
    I have a Mac version Iomega External Portable Hard Drive. This Iomega has USB2, Firewire 400 & Firewire 800 connectivity.
    I do not think Firewire 400 or Firewire 800 cable came with my Iomega.
    Is this Iomega connectable through Firewire 400 or Firewire 800 to a latest Mac Book pro? If so do I connect it to the Thunderbult port in my Mac Book Pro?
    Is there especial cable avaiable for these purposes?
    Regardsa

    Connection is with the FW800 port using a FW800 to FW800
    cable.  The ones I've purchase came with USB and FW800
    cables.  The Thunderbolt port is only for Thunderbolt devices
    or some displays via a Display Port adapter.
    If for some reason you no longer have any cables, FW800 cables
    are readily available either online or at any store that handles
    Apple computers, and some that don't.

  • Firewire 400/800 Questions

    Hello -
    I recently upgraded to a new 24" iMac and noticed that there is only one firewire 400 port (as opposed to my previous G5 which had two.) In my old configuration I had an external drive connected to one of the firewire 400 ports and all of my peripherals (DV camera, card reader, etc.) in the other port.
    Now that there is only one port, and I must daisychain with the hard drive, will I run into a problem when I try to import footage from the DV camera to that external firewire drive? From what I've read only one firewire device should be used at at time and this would obviously be using two.
    I am considering buying a firewire 800 drive as a potential solution and wondered if it would, in fact, be a solution. Also, would a firewire 800 port be that much faster to notice a difference? If so, I might buy one anyway.
    Thank you in advance for your responses and my apologies for not really knowing much about this stuff.

    I have a Core Duo, so I have two FW 400 ports. Thus I'm answering this based on theory, not experience. FW 800 is supposed to support 400 Mbps connections. So you can use the 800 port by getting a cable that has an 800 connector on one end and a 400 on the other. You can definitely use more than one FW device at the same time. However they will share the bandwidth. If they are not designed well, they might possibly interfere, but that shouldn't happen.
    A typical disk drive will deliver about 35 MB/sec. A FW 400 port can handle that. However I've seen some reviews suggesting that with the most recent fast drives (particularly the big ones that bundle several physical drives into one) you may see some performance advantages to FW 800.
    A lot depends upon how you use the drive. If you copy one drive to another, or use large files, you'll get very high speeds. But in normal use, the drive spends most of its time moving the heads around, and you won't see much difference between FW 400 and 800.
    I would be inclined to start by getting a FW 400 to 800 adapter cable and splitting devices across the two ports as you did before.

Maybe you are looking for