432 4.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver; Agent transient failure during message resubmission

I am having an issue where emails to specific users internal to internal are being successfully delivered, but [a duplicate is?] also getting stuck in the "SMTP Delivery to mailbox" queue, with the sender getting a "Delivery is delayed to
these recipients or groups:" "Remote Server returned '400 4.4.7 Message delayed" This only happens with emails to specific people in the organization, they get the email immediately after being sent, and everyone else works fine. This issue
started after we migrated the users mailboxs from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013 CU5, we did not notice the issue until we finished moving all user mailboxes to 2013.
Delivery Report of email to affected user:
Delivered
6/30/2014 11:20 AM mail.domain.com
The message was successfully delivered.
Pending
6/30/2014 11:20 AM
The message has been queued on server 'mail.domain.com' since 6/30/2014 11:20:15 AM (UTC-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). The last attempt to send the message was at 6/30/2014 11:21:09 AM (UTC-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada) and generated the error
'[{LRT=};{LED=432 4.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver; Agent transient failure during message resubmission[Agent: Mailbox Rules Agent]};{FQDN=};{IP=}]'.
-Strange time stamp 
Original message headers:
Received: from mail.domain.com (172.22.220.68) by
 mail.domain.com (172.22.220.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 15.0.913.22; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:36:34 -0500
Received: from mail.domain.com ([fe80::1554:6e6f:4ca5:85be]) by
 mail.domain.com ([fe80::1554:6e6f:4ca5:85be%12]) with mapi id
 15.00.0913.011; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:36:34 -0500
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
From: T S <[email protected]>
To: M M <[email protected]>
CC: D M <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Migration Complete
Thread-Topic: Migration Complete
Thread-Index: Ac+UAzn/W6u8OF7qRG2V93cDeqU24wACDqXL
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:36:33 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [71.170.174.74]
Return-Path: [email protected]
Update 7/2/14:
Checked event viewer, and found that event ID 1051, erroring multiple times per second with message:
"Agent 'Mailbox Rules Agent' caused an unhandled exception 'StoreDriverAgentTransientException: Store Driver Agent was unable to send email.' while handling event 'OnDeliveredMessage'"
Ran Test-MailFlow on my mailbox, and the two know non-working mailboxes, For me it returned as successful, but showed as a Failure on the two other accounts. 
The test emails were actually delivered to the user mailboxes even though it shows as a Failure with the Test-MailFlow command:
From Exchange Queue viewer you can see the test emails stuck in retry, with the following information:
Identity: mail\3112\1395864371267
Subject: Test-Mailflow 8f33ae76-fdd9-4528-8e73-5b9f2481a333 66c7004a-6860-44b2-983a-327aa3c9cfec
Internet Message ID: <[email protected]>
From Address: SystemMailbox{658b82cc-efc2-4407-8c92-8303213c63e2}@domain.com
Status: Retry
Size (KB): 8
Message Source Name: SMTP:Default mail
Source IP: 172.22.220.68
SCL: 0
Date Received: 7/1/2014 9:52:12 PM
Expiration Time: 7/3/2014 9:52:12 PM
Last Error: 432 4.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver; Agent transient failure during message resubmission[Agent: Mailbox Rules Agent]
Queue ID: mail\3112
Recipients:  [email protected];3;3;[{LRT=};{LED=432 4.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver; Agent transient failure during message resubmission[Agent: Mailbox Rules Agent]};{FQDN=};{IP=}];0;CN=Mailbox Database 2111459242,CN=Databases,CN=Exchange Administrative
Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT),CN=Administrative Groups,CN=LCS,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=com;0

Hi S Calkin,
According to the error messages, I find following information for your reference:
1. About Event ID 1051
This warning event indicates that the transport agent referenced in the event description has encountered an unhandled exception while handing the event.
More details in the following article:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/support/ee/transform.aspx?ProdName=Exchange&ProdVer=8.0&EvtID=1051&EvtSrc=MSExchange+Extensibility
2. About "432 4.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver; Agent transient failure during message resubmission[Agent: Mailbox Rules Agent]"
I suggest double check whether you have enough space. I find a similar case that caused by the low space, please see this:
432 4.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver; Agent transient failure during message resubmission[Agent: Mailbox Rules Agent]
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/750d89fb-1832-4aaf-b095-c2b9defec977/432-420-storedrvdeliver-agent-transient-failure-during-message-resubmissionagent-mailbox-rules?forum=exchangesvrgeneral
Thanks
Mavis
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Single Mailbox receiving 432-4.3.2 STOREDRV; mailbox server is too busy error emailing distribution group

    I have a user who is trying to email a distribution group with approximately 185 recipients, 183 internal, and 2 external.
    The user is recieving message delayed/pending for some (but not all) of the recipients. Approximately 15 recipients have recieved the mail including the external recipients and did so shortly after the mail was sent, however, 168 recipients have not recieved
    the email and when I search for the mail in Message Tracking on the server, the pending recipients have the following error:
    Submitted
    04/12/2013 11:56 BTSDCAEXCMDB02.one.local
    The message was submitted to btsdcaexccas02.one.local.
    Group Expanded
    04/12/2013 11:56 btsdcaexccas02.one.local
    The list of members of the group "All TCP Users" was expanded so that the message can be delivered to each recipient.
    Pending
    04/12/2013 11:56 btsdcaexccas02.one.local
    The message has been queued on server 'btsdcaexccas02.one.local' since 04/12/2013 11:56:48 (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London. The last attempt to send the message was at 05/12/2013 12:08:22 (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London and generated the error
    '432-4.3.2 STOREDRV; mailbox server is too busy 432 4.3.2 STOREDRV.Deliver.Exception:StorageTransientException.MapiExceptionNotEnoughMemory; Failed to process message due to a transient exception with message Cannot set search criteria in SearchFolder. Try
    using fewer keywords at the same time, reducing the number of users in the From, To, Cc, and Bcc fields, and reducing the number of mailboxes that are searched at the same time. 16.55847:42000000, 17.43559:0000000090020000000000000000000000000000, 255.23226:2B0A0000,
    255.27962:30000000, 255.17082:F0030000, 0.27745:80030400, 4.21921:F0030000, 255.27962:FA000000, 255.1494:00000000, 255.1238:31000000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000,
    4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000,
    4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.7155:F0030000, 4.6131:F0030000, 4.7728:F0030000, 0.59311:F0030000, 4.8112:F0030000, 255.1750:00000000, 0.26849:00000000, 255.21817:F0030000, 0.30353:00000000, 4.19089:F0030000, 0.18065:0E000000, 4.26257:F0030000'.
    05/12/2013 12:08 btsdcaexccas02.one.local
    Message delivery is taking longer than expected. There may be system delays. For more information, contact your helpdesk.
    Can anyone help as to what is going on here? This only seems to be affecting a single user, and it is intermittent as some recipients received the email, whilst others have not.

    Hi Leo,
    From your description, I recommend you refer to the following blog to set the values of MaxMailboxDeliveryPerMdbConnections and RecipientThreadLimit.
    Store Driver Fault Isolation Improvements in Exchange 2010 SP1
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/04/11/store-driver-fault-isolation-improvements-in-exchange-2010-sp1.aspx
    What's more, here is a thread for your reference.
    4.3.2 432 STOREDRV.Deliver; recipient thread limit exceeded
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/3b097117-6eb7-4368-b45a-62a4cddf871b/432-432-storedrvdeliver-recipient-thread-limit-exceeded?forum=exchange2010
    Hope it helps.
    If there are any problems, please feel free to let me know.
    Best regards,
    Amy
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Reviecing Error 532 5.3.2 STOREDRV.Deliver

    At our site we had this problem before we upgraded to Exchange 2013 CU6 after was installed problem was fixed.  About one month ago we applied some Windows Updates to the Exchange Farm 1 CAS Server, 2 Mailbox Server running in a DAG, all servers
    are Windows 2012.  After the windows updates were applied the
    Remote Server returned '532 5.3.2 STOREDRV.Deliver; Missing or bad StoreDriver MDB properties'Remote. 
    error has come back.  Is there a known issue with a windows update that would cause this?  Would upgrading to CU7 fix the issue again?

    Hi,
    Before upgrading to CU7, I suggest try following method.
    In the multi-tenant document Microsoft says that one should not use the "hide from addresslist" attribute on the users. I guess this is because of the Routing Agent.
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=36790 
    More information, please refer this similar thread:
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-us/69a3e303-f848-4729-b818-ea1acaeb43d2/exchange-2013-address-book-policy-routing-agent-issue-with-mailboxes-hidden-from-the-address-lists?forum=exchangesvrsecuremessaging
    Thanks
    If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • #550 5.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service reported an error.

    Hi, 
    I created a mailbox few days before, everythign was working fine and suddenly when some one tried to send email on that mailbox it bounced back with following error:
    There's a problem with the recipient's mailbox. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
    Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 
    Diagnostic information for administrators:
    Generating server: Mail01.abc.com
    [email protected]
    #550 5.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service reported an error. The following information should help identify the cause of this error: "MapiExceptionNotFound:16.18969:9A000000, 17.27161:00000000CC000000000000000600000000000000,
    255.23226:00000000, 255.27962:FE000000, 255.17082:0F010480, 0.26937:94000000, 4.21921:0F010480, 255.27962:FA000000, 255.1494:00000000, 255.26426:FE000000, 4.7588:0F010480, 4.6564:0F010480, 2.17597:00000000, 2.25805:00000000, 4.8936:0F010480, 4.14312:0F010480,
    4.2199:0F010480, 2.25805:00000000, 4.8936:0F010480, 2.22957:00000000, 2.19693:00000000, 2.17917:00000000, 2.27341:00000000, 4.8936:0F010480, 4.17097:0F010480, 4.8620:0F010480, 255.1750:0F010480, 0.26849:0F010480, 255.21817:0F010480, 0.26297:0F010480, 4.16585:0F010480,
    0.32441:0F010480, 4.1706:0F010480, 0.24761:0F010480, 4.20665:0F010480, 0.25785:EC030000, 4.29881:0F010480". ##
    Original message headers:
    Received: from Mailbox.abc.com ([fe80::892d:93d6:b1ac:b70a]) by mail01
     ([10.72.0.95]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:04:55 +0500
    Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    From: Anwar Amjad <[email protected]>
    To: All-HEC <[email protected]>
    Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:04:53 +0500
    Subject: FW: Suggestions & New Arrival in HEC Library
    Thread-Topic: Suggestions & New Arrival in HEC Library
    Thread-Index: Ac3vHgwR50OLs2BnQuOzo9jWg4e1gQAvJtUw
    Message-ID: <[email protected]>
    References: <[email protected]>
    In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
    Accept-Language: en-US
    Content-Language: en-US
    X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
    X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <[email protected]>
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, OOF, AutoReply
    After this error, i treid to send email again and there is no error and email was delivered. What was the cause of this error?
    Hasan

    Hi,
    I tried to start seeding again but it is at same status. I will try again and hopefully it will get resolved.
    But, yesterday i ran in to the most complex issue i have ever seen with Exchange.
    There was a unexpected power cut at our datacentre due to which both the nodes went down.
    After that both the nodes came up. But the all 3 databases were dismounted.
    Therefore, i ran Eseutil /mh resulting dirty shutdown.
    I was able to repair 2 databases.
    But the 3rd one was not mounting with below error.
    Microsoft Exchange Error
    Failed to mount database 'Mailbox Database'.
    Mailbox Database
    Failed
    Error:
    Exchange is unable to mount the database that you specified. Specified database: XXXXX\First Storage Group\Mailbox Database; Error code: MapiExceptionJetErrorAttachedDatabaseMismatch: Unable to mount database. (hr=0x80004005, ec=-1216).
    I was able to mount database somehow. There are 7 User mailboxes (Tier 1) on this database.
    All emails sent to the users in this database are bouncing back with the below error.
    This storage groups holds the mailboxes of my Senior Managements. And their mailboxes are down for almost 20 Hrs. I am spinning my head since yesterday but not able to find any fix. Can you please guide me in this concern.
    Best Regards
    K2
    Kapil Kashyap

  • #550 4.4.7 QUEUE.Expired; message expired ## With LastError "A storage transient failure has occurred during content conversion." In submission Queue. (Exchange 2013)

    Greetings,
    We seem to be having a problem with some users who are attempting to send e-mails from within the organisation to an external domain. Not all users are affected, and not all outgoing e-mails have this issue.
    Some e-mails get stuck in the submission queue. This is the error message in Last Error : "A storage transient failure has occurred during content conversion."
    Days later, the internal user who send the message gets a #550 4.4.7 QUEUE.Expired; message expired ## NDR.
    We did have some initial configuration issues, but these were fixed more than a week ago :
    - The external FQDN during EHLO was set to the wrong address, now pointing to the correct one.
    - SPF record was updated with new IP adress.
    Here is some additional information on the issue :
    - Not on any blacklists - checked using dnsbl.info
    - Telnet to remote servers works from exchange server, connections are accepted and can send mail.
    - Outbound SMTP test ran using Microsoft Remote Connectivity Analyser : Passed with both External (Static) and Smarthost IP.
    - This seems to happen only with emails that have an attachment and that are transfered, but only for the affected users. 
    - If content from these e-mails is manually copied over to a new email, email is sent to destination without problem.
    Configuration information :
    - Exchange 2013 running on Windows 2012 Datacenter with all latest updates.
    - Outgoing e-mail is sent via smarthost. Only one outbound transport rule is active.
    - Using internal DNS server.
    - There is only one mailbox database.
    Thank you for taking the time to read this!

    On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:31:14 +0000, Ipigi wrote:
    >Sorry, I often get some terms mixed up when I explain things as our users use the French version of outlook.
    >
    >E-mails are not transferred, but forwarded manually from their outlook. Message format in outlook is set to HTML and not Rich Text when they foward the e-mail.
    Do they forward the message as an attachment?
    >When forwarded internally, this is in the internet headers :
    >
    >Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    Within your organization I'm prety sure that messages will use TNEF.
    What does the message contain at the external recipient's side?
    >It really seems to me that Exchange is not converting RTF to Plain Text. The first link you provided states in it's final paragraph that Exchange should be doing this conversion.
    If you can, try creating a mail-enabed Contact for one of the external
    recipients and set the message format on that.
    >If I disabled TNEF as that link suggests, offending messages will get stuck in the submission queue again.
    >
    >I thank you for your help so far. This is not an issue I've had with any previous installations/migrations of Exchange that I have done.
    >
    >Please let me know if you need any additional information.
    Have you tried UNsetting TNEF on the remote domain?
    Set-RemoteDomain Default -TNEFEnabled $null
    That should leave it up to the client to determine the format. It's
    probably not what you're after, but see it makes a difference in the
    format.
    Rich Matheisen
    MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
    --- Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP

  • A storage transient failure has occurred during content conversion

    Hi,
    I have Exchange 2010 SP3 installed on Windows server 2012.
    External invites are not processing, and return with Source Contex "StorageTransientFailureDuringContentConversion".
    This is cause a great problem in our enviroment...
    Some suggests?
    Att
    Paulo Nunes

    What version of Exchange 2010 SP3 do you have?  RU4 for Exchange 2010 SP3 has been released -
    KB2905616 .
    RU3 is supposed to fix this particular issue, RU4 includes that fix as well. 
    Previous support forum question on this -
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/fd7ef80e-f80b-47ed-883b-a34511c6233c/a-storage-transient-failure-has-occurred-during-content-conversion?forum=exchangesvrsecuremessaginglegacy
    JAUCG - Please remeber to mark replies as helpful if they were or as answered if I provided a solution.

  • Query works in Test mode but fails with transient failure

    Hi,
    I have a query that works well while testing with input json data. However, when the job is started the query fails with transient failure.
    I have two eventhub input sources input1 and input2. I also have a reference data source in a blob, ref.
    The query is 
    WITH nameone AS(
    SELECT ref.field1 as field1,ref.field2 as field2,MIN(input1.datetimestamp) AS datetimestamp,avg(input1.value) as value FROM input1 TIMESTAMP BY datetimestamp JOIN ref ON ref.field1 = input1.field1 GROUP BY ref.field1,tumblingwindow(second,30)
    ), nametwo AS(
    SELECT ref.field1 as field1,ref.field2 as field2,MIN(input2.datetimestamp) AS datetimestamp,avg(input2.value) as value FROM input2 TIMESTAMP BY datetimestamp JOIN ref ON ref.field1 = input2.field1 GROUP BY ref.field1,tumblingwindow(second,30)
    SELECT field1, field2,datetimestamp,value from nameone
    UNION
    SELECT field1, field2,datetimestamp,value from nametwo
    Thanks

    I solved the problem. 
    The issue was in conversion of incoming data to write into an SQL db.
    Query failed to convert 
     System.Int64 (incoming data format) to  System.Double ( SQL column data format)
    I solved it by changing SQL column format to int, but I think this casting should be done automatically by the query. I can also CAST the data I guess but sometimes using CAST on everything is kind of a pain.
    Another issue I faced was the failure messages. I checked the logs for last 12 hours. Sometimes the failure will point to the Writing Error (conversion of int to double) but sometimes the failure will simply be transient failure. So it was difficult to pinpoint
    the error exactly.
    Thanks anyways.

  • The job is experiencing a transient failure and processing may be delayed

    Hi,
    I get the following error (in the management services operation logs) every 10-15 minutes.
    What does it mean?
    Thanks.
    "The job is experiencing a transient failure and processing may be delayed"
    Correlation ID:
    340f6e80-8559-4892-b61a-84bad23f947a
    Message:
    The job is experiencing a transient failure and processing may be delayed.
    Message Time:
    01/31/2015 19:56:07 UTC
    Microsoft.Resources/EventNameV2:
    controller
    Microsoft.Resources/Operation:
    Information
    Microsoft.Resources/ResourceUri:
    /subscriptions/b4104220-ea0c-4a63-b0c2-a3c80ba30e23/resourceGroups/StreamAnalytics-Default-West-Europe/providers/Microsoft.StreamAnalytics/streamingjobs/soiotbesajob
    Janiv Ratson. Technology and Development Expert. | BL: http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/janiv/ | LI: http://www.linkedin.com/in/janiv | TW: http://twitter.com/janiv http://about.me/janiv

    Hi Janiv,
    Below is a query that I believe should work for you. This query will do a sum when Type is 10 and an average when Type is 11:
                SELECT
                deh.name as NAME,
                deh.type as EventType,
                SUM(value) as EventCount,
                COUNT(*) as Occurrences
                FROM input as deh
                WHERE deh.type = 11
                GROUP BY deh.type, deh.name, TumblingWindow(minute,5)
                UNION
                SELECT
                deh.name as NAME,
                deh.type as EventType,
                AVG(value) as EventCount,
                COUNT(*) as Occurrences
                FROM input as deh
                WHERE deh.type = 10
                GROUP BY deh.type, deh.name, TumblingWindow(minute,5)
    Concerning Device_Id, currently, we do ask that the fields be consistent and explicitly provided for each and every event. We cannot look at a previous event and get a field value from there.
    I hope this answers your question,
    Thanks

  • ERROR "An exception has been raised that is likely due to a transient failure. ..." when connecting to Always on Availability Group Listener with ApplicationIntent=ReadOnly

    Application team is receiving the following error message when applications try to connect through the Availablity Group Listener using readonly
    parameter:
     "An exception has been raised that is likely
    due to a transient failure. If you are connecting to a SQL Azure database consider using SqlAzureExecutionStrategy."
     Already using latest .net framework. Using the
    Extended events I can trace the read_only_route_complete event as well. However, they get this message when trying to open the read only database.
    If I try to simulate the connection to ReadOnly replica from management studio, it is working successfully. But not from the application:
    Note:
    -verified firewall is disabled. (this is development environment)
    -SQL Server 2012 SP2 is installed.

    Hi IbrahimMehdi,
    I suggest you read this
    blog to check the SNAC provider and connection string in client application.
    1. Make sure that SNAC provider is installed properly where your client application runs.
    2. Please note that when using SQL Native Access Client SQL OLE DB, the application intent connection string should be specified with a space: 'Application Intent'. However, when connecting using SQLClient or ODBC specify 'ApplicationIntent' with
    no space.
    There is also a blog about configuring AlwaysOn read-only routing for your reference.
    http://scottless.com/blog/archive/2012/01/25/sql-server-2012-configuring-alwayson-read-only-routing.aspx
    Thanks,
    Lydia Zhang
    Lydia Zhang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Workflow Agent login failure

    Hi Everybody,
    I m following KFI process for Invoice Processing.The document image is successfully loaded into UCM and display in IPM search criteria.But the thing is that when ever i m watching Documentrouting in EM ,there is no instance created .
    IPM logs:Workflow Agent login failure
    Please guide me how to solve this one.
    With Regards
    Jyoti

    Hi Everybody,
    Actually imaging.ear was missing.It has solved with the patch installation for soa suite 11.1.1.3 in linux machine.
    Thnx for co-operation.
    With Regards
    Jyoti

  • Data Guard Agent, Authentication Failure

    I'm working with two Windows 2003 servers, attempting to use one as a standby and one as a primary database use Data Guard. However, I'm having a bit of trouble when trying to get one server to communicate through the Management Agent and Management Service. I've done Management Agent installs on about 20 XP workstations and they've also worked wonderfully with the Oracle Grid Control.
    When the agent on my would-be standby database instance starts up I'm receiving the following errors in emagent.trc:
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN main: clear collection state due to OMS_version difference
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN command: Job Subsystem Timeout set at 600 seconds
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN upload: Upload manager has no Failure script: disabled
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN upload: Recovering left over xml files in upload directory
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN upload: Recovered 0 left over xml files in upload directory
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Metric RuntimeLog does not have any data columns
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Metric collectSnapshot does not have any data columns
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 ERROR engine: [oracle_bc4j] CategoryProp NAME [VersionCategory] is not one of the valid choices
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 ERROR engine: ParseError: File=D:\oracle\product\10.1.0\dg\sysman\admin\metadata\oracle_bc4j.xml, Line=486, Msg=attribute NAME in <CategoryProp> cannot be NULL
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Column name EFFICIENCY__BYTES_SAVED_WITH_COMPRESSION__AVG_PER_SEC_SINCE_START too long, truncating to EFFICIENCY__BYTES_SAVED_WITH_COMPRESSION__AVG_PER_SEC_SINCE_STAR
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Column name ESI__ERRORS__ESI_DEFAULT_FRAGMENT_SERVED__AVG_PER_SEC_SINCE_START too long, truncating to ESI__ERRORS__ESI_DEFAULT_FRAGMENT_SERVED__AVG_PER_SEC_SINCE_STAR
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Column name SERVERS__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__REQUESTS__AVG_PER_SEC_SINCE_START too long, truncating to SERVERS__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__REQUESTS__AVG_PER_SEC_SINCE_STA
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Column name SERVERS__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__LATENCY__MAX_PER_SEC_SINCE_START too long, truncating to SERVERS__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__LATENCY__MAX_PER_SEC_SINCE_STAR
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Column name SERVERS__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__LATENCY__AVG_PER_SEC_SINCE_START too long, truncating to SERVERS__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__LATENCY__AVG_PER_SEC_SINCE_STAR
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Column name SERVERS__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__OPEN_CONNECTIONS__MAX_SINCE_START too long, truncating to SERVERS__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__OPEN_CONNECTIONS__MAX_SINCE_STA
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Column name SERVER__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__REQUESTS__MAX_PER_SEC_SINCE_START too long, truncating to SERVER__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__REQUESTS__MAX_PER_SEC_SINCE_STAR
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Column name SERVER__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__REQUESTS__AVG_PER_SEC_SINCE_START too long, truncating to SERVER__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__REQUESTS__AVG_PER_SEC_SINCE_STAR
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Column name SERVER__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__OPEN_CONNECTIONS__MAX_SINCE_START too long, truncating to SERVER__APP_SRVR_STATS__SERVER__OPEN_CONNECTIONS__MAX_SINCE_STAR
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Metric Wireless_PID does not have any data columns
    2005-11-01 15:16:54 Thread-3836 WARN metadata: Metric numberOfAppDownloadsOverInterval_instance does not have any data columns
    2005-11-01 15:17:00 Thread-4172 WARN vpxoci: OCI Error -- ErrorCode(1017): ORA-01017: invalid username/password; logon denied
    SQL = " OCISessionBegin"...
    LOGIN = dbsnmp/<PW>@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=MY_DATABASE)(PORT=1521))(CONNECT_DATA=(SID=CPD2DB)))
    2005-11-01 15:17:00 Thread-4172 ERROR vpxoci: ORA-01017: invalid username/password; logon denied
    2005-11-01 15:17:00 Thread-4172 WARN vpxoci: Login 0xe8c220 failed, error=ORA-01017: invalid username/password; logon denied
    2005-11-01 15:17:00 Thread-4172 WARN TargetManager: Exception in computing dynamic properties of {MY_DATABASE, oracle_database },MonitorConfigStatus::ORA-01017: invalid username/password; logon denied
    2005-11-01 15:17:01 Thread-4172 WARN vpxoci: OCI Error -- ErrorCode(1017): ORA-01017: invalid username/password; logon denied
    I've already toggled the Local Security Policy (Log On As Batch Job) setting in Windows, unlocked the Monitoring Profile account, etc. I've also tried to set the Preferred Host Credentials for the database, but it doesn't seem to want to authenticate the Windows 2003 Administrator user.
    Anyone have any other suggestions?

    Check the following:
    Does the user have administrative privilege on the system?
    Is the user running this part of ORA_DBA group?
    Does the user have the local security policy "Logon as Batch Job"?
    Have you set the OS Preferred Credential? If you are a domain user, this will be looking for domain\user name instead of just the user name.
    On another note:
    Have you doen any upgrades to the OMS repository?
    If yes, is the new Repository compatible with the EM Console?

  • Agent Connection  failure

    I got a Database Instance and agent down.
    Agent Connection to Instance
    Status Failed
    Details ORA-12505: TNS:listener does not currently know of SID given in connect descriptor (DBD ERROR: OCIServerAttach)
    But Listener is UP
    I check tnsping and ping . all works. I use oracle10g R2 in window 2003
    I try to startup or recovery.
    I enter database sys or dab id/password and remote PC ID/password.
    But I got a error message for my password. Actually, I can use these ID/PW to remote PC and access database.
    I am new.
    What Do I need to do for this condition?
    Thanks
    JIm

    Thanks for you help. plz see copy message.
    1)
    Agent Connection to Instance
    Status Failed
    Details ORA-12505: TNS:listener does not currently know of SID given in connect descriptor (DBD ERROR: OCIServerAttach)
    2)database instance
    Database Instance
    Port 1521
    SID sale
    Oracle Home D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\sale
    3)Listener
    Listener
    Status Up
    Port 1521
    Name LISTENER
    Oracle Home D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\sale
    Location D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\sale\network\admin
    I made ping and tnsping.and lrsnctl. i do not find issue.
    I am waiting for you help in detail.
    Nice day
    JIm

  • Mail not delivered for 4 hours warning message

    I've recently started getting .mac mail bounced back to me from MAIL DELIVERY SUBSYSTEM saying that the message couldn't be delivered for the past 4 hours and would continue trying for 4 days. They never seem to go through.
    This only happens with mail to my parents. I can send them mail from a different ISP account, and my husband can send them mail from his .mac account. I have not changed my preferences and neither have they. I would suspect their ISP, except that my husband's .mac mail goes through.
    Any idea what the problem might be? Here's the relevant information from the warning message:
    <parents' address>...Deferred:Invalid argument
    Warnng: message still undelivered after 4 hours
    Will keep trying until message is 4 days old
    Reporting-MTA: dns; smtpout.mac.com
    Action: delayed
    Status: 4.4.2
    MacBook   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

    You are apparently not alone - this from Macfixit today:
    Updated Friday, February 09 2007 @ 09:15 AM PST
    Today's Featured Article
    Late-Breakers
    .Mac outages, problems accessing email (#2): possible fixes
    Users are continuing to report (in droves) problems accessing .Mac services -- particularly mail -- over the past few days.
    Most reports indicate problems accessing .Mac mail from within various clients, including Mail.app. As such, the best stop-gap solution is to simply use the .Mac webmail interface in most cases
    However, some users have also reported problems receiving messages through the webmail interface.
    MacFixIt reader Michael Novelli writes:
    "My .mac mail account stopped working yesterday. I can access it online."
    Another reader adds:
    "Same issue here with .Mac email. If I look at the Activity Viewer I can see my other email accounts connect and finish but .Mac just hangs with the blue and white candy cane progress bar. .Mac has become so unreliable that I cannot use it as my main account and have chosen another email service."
    MacFixIt reader Jim writes:
    "I am also encountering problems accessing .Mac mail with Eudora. Mail is apparently going out using .Mac and Eudora, but the problem is receiving mail."
    Tom James reports issues with other areas of .Mac service:
    "In addition to the problems accessing .mail via Mail, I had a problem today updating my .mac website. The server consistently refused to make changes to the welcome page even though iWeb organiser reported that the site as amended had been published. Deletion of the site in iWeb and creation of a second site initially did not work either but it n ow appears to have been updated. Perhaps there were delays in implementing changes due to the creaky nature of .Mac servers."
    Possible fixes
    Clear caches We've received unconfirmed reports that running the maintenance routines offered by AppleJack can resolve some .Mac connectivity issues -- potentially indicating cache corruption as a cause of problems. Cache cleaning can also be accomplished with tools like Cocktail or Tiger Cache Cleaner.
    Just restart In other cases, a simple restart can have a beneficial effect. MacFixIt reader Tracey writes:
    "I also experienced the .Mac mail connection problem yesterday utilizing Mail.app Version 2.1.1 (752.3). In my case, after a half an hour of being unable to connect, it finally dawned on me to go back to the basics of troubleshooting. After a reboot, and a subsequent relaunch of Mail.app, my .Mac mail became immediately responsive, and has been working without a glitch ever since (24 hours). It was a pretty simple fix in my case (or a serendipitous coincidence of timing)."

  • Dynamic agent rule changement during approval steps

    Hi gurus,
    my question is based on a customer requirement.
    they want a n-step approval with dynamic agent determination: fine.
    then they want to maintain the substitutes: fine as well.
    But what they want to do is to change the workflow path based on the substitute.
    I mean: if the first aprover has set a substitute the first task goes to the substitute, but the following tasks have to follow the substitute hierarchy and not the original workflow path.
    So we don't think the standard system way to use the substitute is not enough, but we need to determinate in the beginning if a substitute was set for some approvers.
    The thing is that the substitute record is dynamic and has a validity end, and could be set after the workflow is started.
    Is it possible at every step recalculate the workflow path and the next approvers (so to discover if a substitute rule has be changed or created or deleted)?
    PS: we are using SRM 7.0 and the process controlled workflow.
    Thank you very much in advance!
    Regards,
    Maria

    Hi Maria
    I mean today the workflow starts and the system calculates the path based on the substitute rules active.
    OK with that.
    But what if the substitute rule change tomorrow?
        How you are saying the substitute rule change tomorrow?.  You should not assume it. You should confirm it.  You cannot implement a work flow for tomorrow's requirement. Always there will be a change even if you implement for tomorrows change. Never do that. Do only for today's requirement.  
    My question is if it's possible to every step of the work flow change the agents.
        I feel that this approach is wrong. simple view i will give u to thing. take only 2 steps
    loop.
    1) for determining the approver based on business logic in one method.
    2) use the expression in the user decision step and send the work item for approval
    endloop.
    This i have explained for simple logic, create you own logic and apply on loop and endloop. It will work.
    Regards
    vijay

  • Get Agent IP Address During Script Execution

    Good Evening,
    I'm looking for a little advice...  I'm trying to develop a method of alerting agents to the fact they are not ready.  I have a script that can dynamically change the wallpaper on an IP phone.  My aim is to add a step to the "Select Resource" portion of a script that will execute if an agent doesn't answer a call presented to them.  However in order for this script to work it requires the IP address of the phone the agent is logged on to.  Can anybody recommend a method of getting this IP dynamically during script execution?  We use EM so statically defining IPs in an XML document wouldn't be appropriate.
    On a similar note I'd also need a method of executing the same script when an agent manually alters their state to ready.  i.e. When they change to ready on the IP Phone Agent I'd like to be able to intercept that process as it takes place and automatically trigger this same script.
    I'm using UCCX 8.5(3).
    Hope that makes sense.  Any suggestions regarding how to achieve this would be much appreciated.
    Much appreciated,
    Ryan

    I don't write enough scripting to know for sure if the agent's phone's IP address would be available anywhere in the UCCX enviornment by default but I'm going to go with 'probably not'. You'd need to obtain this information from CUCM, the most straightforward method would likely be to use CUCM's AXL interface to pull this information. The HTTP Document Step may be able to produce the necessary AXL requests I guess, but I've never tried.
    Cheers,
    Kris

Maybe you are looking for