4402 Upgrade License for Additional Access Points

Can you apply the L-LIC-WPLUS-25 to a 4402 to allow it more access points? Or are the 4402 Models all locked into their designated access point license?
Thanks,
-Con

Hi Con,
Sadly not :(
The number of AP support is "hard coded" on the WLC model and is not upgradable until the 5500 series.
Cheers!
Rob

Similar Messages

  • License for Monitor Access Point

    Dear Friends,
    I have a 5508 controller with 200 access points . I have additional 10 access points to be used as Monitor Mode, as this will be connected to the MSSE. Question here is does the monitor access points requires licenses to configure on the controller or does IPS license of 25 AP's is enough for MSE.
    I think for these 10 Monitor Access Points, we need to have licenses for the controller as well as MSE license for the access point. Am I right in this assumption?
    BR,
    Sid

    Hi Sid,
    the license on the WLC is for "joined APs" whatever is their role. So monitor mode APs count the same as other APs.
    Regards,
    Nicolas

  • IOS to LWAPP for 1130AG Access Points

    We have initially installed IOS-based 1130 APs. If we would be upgrading it to LWAPP mode, could we pushed IOS-to-LWAPP upgrade thru the network? what procedures are required?

    Hi Leopoldo,
    This is possible and fully supported and can be done using the "LWAPP Upgrade Tool". Have a look at the following;
    LWAPP Upgrade Tool Troubleshoot Tips
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_tech_note09186a008072d9a1.shtml
    Access points must run Cisco IOS Release 12.3(7)JA or later before you use the upgrade tool.
    System Requirements
    You can use the Autonomous to Lightweight Mode upgrade tool to install Cisco IOS Release 12.3(11)JX on these access points:
    All 1100 series access points containing MP21G (802.11g) radios
    ***All 1130, 1230, and 1240 series access points
    All modular 1200 series access points running Cisco IOS software and containing these supported radios:
    802.11g: MP21G, MP31G
    802.11a: AIR-RM21A-x-K9, AIR-RM22A-x-K9
    All 1300 series access points in access point mode
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/ios/release/notes/b311jx1.html
    Cisco has released a free tool called the "Autonomous to Lightweight Mode Upgrade Tool" that allows selected Cisco Aironet autonomous access point models to be configured for lightweight mode operation.
    The Autonomous to Lightweight Mode Upgrade Tool supports the following models:
    Cisco Aironet 1240AG Series access points
    Cisco Aironet 1230AG Series access points
    Cisco Aironet 1200 Series access points that contain 802.11g (AIR-MP21G-x-K9) and/or second-generation 802.11a radios (AIR-RM21A-x-K9 or AIR-RM22A-x-K9)
    Cisco Aironet 1130AG Series access points
    **Cisco Aironet 1100 Series Access Points that contain 802.11g radios (AIR-AP1121G-x-K9)
    Cisco Aironet 1300 Series Access Points/Bridges (AIR-BR1310G-x-K9 or AIR-BR1310G-x-K9-R). A Cisco Aironet 1300 Series operating in Lightweight Access Point Protocol (LWAPP) mode only operates as an access point. This series does not support LWAPP bridging mode.
    The Autonomous to Lightweight Mode Upgrade Tool supports a process to migrate an autonomous access point from autonomous mode to lightweight mode. Unlike a VxWorks to Cisco IOS Software upgrade, this process is a Cisco IOS Software upgrade to the existing Cisco IOS Software image-not an operating system "swapout". In converted access points operating in lightweight mode, Cisco IOS Software continues to run on the access point, while LWAPP is used to communicate with a wireless LAN controller. Since LWAPP supports automatic access point configuration, there is no need to retain or convert the original autonomous Cisco IOS Software access point configuration.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns340/ns394/ns348/ns337/networking_solutions_white_paper0900aecd804f1a23.shtml
    Cisco Aironet Access Point Support for Lightweight Access Point Protocol
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6521/prod_bulletin0900aecd80321a2c.html
    Upgrading Autonomous Cisco Aironet Access Points to Lightweight Mode
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/prod_technical_reference09186a00804fc3dc.html#wp157147
    Hope this helps!
    Rob

  • Looking for an Access Point with 2 Ethernet ports and powered via PoE

    Hi Gurus,
    I am looking for an Access Point with 2 Ethernet ports and the access point can be powered via PoE. I have been assigned with a requirement where the rooms need to have access point as well as an Ethernet Cable provided from the Access Point as a backup for connectivity.
    The room only has one data cable coming from the main IT room as well does not have a spare power socket to power the Access Point. Will be good if it can be centrally controlled or controller based.
    Any recommendations?
    Regards
    J

    For the backup plan, the cheapest solution may be to just run a couple new cat5e drops to the room(est cost $250). If not then purchase a small Cisco POE switch for the room(est cost $2k). For wireless I would purchase a POE enabled Cisco AP. But you will need to verify the POE switch/blade you will be connecting the AP to can power the AP you buy. I got burned by that issue when we purchased some Cisco 1251 AP's with dual radios and they needed more power than our 4500 POE blades could handle. We were told we would need to purchase new 48 port 10/100/1000 blades or power injectors. Our Cisco sales vendor took the heat for that mistake.
    Posted by WebUser Steven Kinney from Cisco Support Community App

  • QOS config 4500 switchport for Lightweight access point

    What is the best QOS configuration what needs to be applied on a 4500 switchport for Lightweight access point.

    Hi,
    If you are asking about Layer 2 QoS configuration for switch-port then it is global command, which will apply on all switch-ports, not for any specific switch-port. 
    As far as switch-port mode is concern which in connected to LWAP then yes it is better you keep it in default mode.

  • API for setting Access points with PEAP programmatically

    Dear Godly developers,
    Would like to find out if there is any APIs for setting Access points with PEAP programmatically?
    Regards
    hAoZ

    Thanks for your response. We don't have the Wireless LAN Controller installed and have only configured directly through the AP's, which don't seem to have any configuration changes regarding Aironet IE's. Is there a config change that needs to be made just on the AP's? Or is the Wireless LAN Controller software necessary to make this change?
    Thanks again.

  • Need Information For Connecting Access point to WLC 4402

    Hi Friends
    I need Some information for Connecting  my New Access point ( Cisco AIRLAP 1242AG) with WLC(4402) Controller
    In our network set up we have two WLC(4402) we needs to Connect this New Accesspoint To one of our WLC
    My Access point is brand New. I need to Know what all i have to do inorder to connect this AP to the controller (from Acesspoint perspective & WLC perspective)
    I need to Know  what I need to do in AP to connect to the Controller
    Do i need to Assign Static IP Address forAP or after connecting to the switch it automatically gets ip from DHCP and regsiter with controller??
    Do i Need to Configure my AP with default gateway(the switch to which is connected ?) & DO i need to configure the AP with  Controller Ip address ??
    Pls Assist
    Regards
    Safwan

    Hi Scot...
    We tried Connecting the Access Point yesterday, but it failed....
    We are using Cisco 3500 Access point ...
    when we connected , first it automatically got an ip address using DHCP but following error occurred
    P70ca.9bd5.77c6#
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
    Not in Bound state.
    *Mar  1 00:13:56.539: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Invalid event 38 & state 2 combination
    *Mar  1 00:13:56.555: %DHCP-6-ADDRESS_ASSIGN: Interface GigabitEthernet0 assigne
    d DHCP address 10.50.11.26, mask 255.255.0.0, hostname AP70ca.9bd5.77c6
    *Mar  1 00:14:04.564: %CAPWAP-3-UNSUPPORTED_WLC_VERSION: Unsupported version 6.0
    .182.0 on WLC USSTLController01
    *Mar  1 00:14:14.564: %CAPWAP-3-UNSUPPORTED_WLC_VERSION: Unsupported version 6.0
    .182.0 on WLC USSTLController01
    *Mar  1 00:14:24.564: %CAPWAP-3-UNSUPPORTED_WLC_VERSION: Unsupported
    version 6.0
    .182.0
    version 6.0
    .182.0
    on WLC USSTLController01
    version 6.0
    .182.0
    Then I COnfigured Ap with  Static ip address & default gateway & controller Ip but tht too didnt work...
    .182.0 on WLC USSTLController01
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
    *Mar  1 00:13:40.908: %CDP_PD-2-POWER_LOW: All radios disabled - NEGOTIATED WS-C
    3750X-48P (e05f.b907.9a20)
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>en
    Password:
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
    *Mar  1 00:13:48.033: %CAPWAP-3-DHCP_RENEW: Could not discover WLC using DHCP IP
    . Renewing DHCP IP.
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
    P70ca.9bd5.77c6>
    *Mar  1 00:13:40.908: %CDP_PD-2-POWER_LOW: All radios disabled - NEGOTIATED WS-C
    3750X-48P (e05f.b907.9a20)
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6>en
    Password:
    AP70ca.9bd5.77c6#
    *Mar  1 00:13:48.033: %CAPWAP-3-DHCP_RENEW: Could not discover WLC using DHCP IP
    . Renewing DHCP IP.
    I also  Need to Know Cisco Access point 3500 can be associated with WLC 4402 ( version 6.0.182.0) ??
    Pls Advice How to proceed further

  • Upgrading license for more context cisco asa 5580

    Hi guys:
    This is the situation I got to firewalls with failover and I need to upgrade the license so I can get more context (right now I have 5 context and I need 10) so I was looking at the procedure and I'm not sure If I need to restart the device or not. I was looking at this procedure:
    Upgrading the License for a Failover using ASDM (No Reload Required)
    Use the following procedure using ASDM if your new license does not require you to reload. This procedure ensures that there is no downtime.
    •1.       On the active unit, choose Configuration > Device Management > High Availability > Failover > Setup, and uncheck the Enable Failover check box. Now click Apply. The standby unit remains in a pseudo-standby state. Deactivating failover on the active unit prevents the standby unit from attempting to become active during the period when the licenses do not match.
    •2.       Choose Configuration > Device Management > Licensing > Activation Key, and enter the new activation key that you obtained with the active unit serial number. Now click Update Activation Key.
    •3.       Log into the standby unit by double-clicking its address in the Device List. If the device is not in the Device List, click Add to add the device. You might be prompted for credentials to log in.
    •4.       Choose Configuration > Device Management > Licensing > Activation Key, and enter the new activation key that you obtained with the standby unit serial number. Now click Update Activation Key.
    •5.       Log into the active unit again by double-clicking its address in the Device List. Choose Configuration > Device Management > High Availability > Failover > Setup, and re-check the Enable Failover check box.
    •6.       Click Apply. This completes the procedure.
    link: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a00806b1c0f.shtml#norelasdm
    But then I checked on the cisco web page that there are some license that need to reload I see this:
    All models
    Downgrading any license (for example, going from 10 contexts to 2 contexts).
    Note If a temporary license expires, and the permanent license is a downgrade, then you do not need to immediately reload the security appliance; the next time you reload, the permanent license is restored.
    link: https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa81/license/license81.html
    So I just want to know if I'm UPGRADING from 5 to 10 context the reload applies to my situation or not?
    Regards

    No reload is required when you are upgrading from 5 to 10 security context license.
    Reload is only required on the following feature:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/configuration/guide/license.html#wp1361750
    Hope this helps.

  • Question about using "dumb terminals" for multiple access points

    For both home and a small busniess setting I have been trying to find info about the possibility of using some form of dumb terminal to provide multimple acces points to a single computer rather than a network of multiple computers.
    I would like to use my LCD TVs, (which have AV and PC inputs) as monitors. I am going to purchase a new mac soon, and it seems it would make sense to spend more on 1 mac with more capability rather than 5 mac-minis (yes, I am trying to have 5 access points, with one one mac).
    I have CAT5 running to all the locations I want to use, I also have airport.
    For the most part I'm expecting only one user at a time, but occasional two. OS X is multi user, but can it support simultaneous users?
    I have searched the discussions/forums and some google searching. Maybe I'm asking the wrong questions. But, I can't imagine that I am the only person who has thought of this.
    If you have any thoughts or suggesting for further searching I would appreciate it. Thanks

    On each of these 'dumb terminals' I assume you are looking to access the complete Mac desktop from the central Mac?
    Unfortunately, this can't be done.
    In the past, the setup you describe first was used on mainframes where each end node was a dumb terminal. But it was just text.
    Next came X11 which does mostly what you are asking about, but each end node is basically a full computer in itself. You can remotely log into a central server and get a complete desktop session. This would take using a central computer that is running full X-Windows and then you'd need a PC running Linux, or running Windows and a X-Terminal package like Exceed or a Mac with X11 installed (not sure if you can make the Mac X11 do a full-blown desktop X session.) Note that as the central server, you'd need a computer running an OS with full-blown X-Windows (Linux, Solaris, HP-UX, etc.) -- OS X is UNIX but it doesn't run full X-Windows as its window manager.
    Finally, there is what are called 'thin clients' ... a good example is Sun Microsystems' SunRay... it's enough hardware on the client side to provide display, keyboard and mouse. They boot off a central Sun Solaris server and work just like X-Windows clients. The difference here is that the SunRay unit can't work on its own; it has no disk, and has to boot from the SunRay server.
    And of course there's Windows Terminal Services, which lets you do the same thing with Windows. I think that takes Windows Server edition software on the central computer, and then a regular PC as a client.
    Sounds like your only option is to use Mac minis as you suggest. But then there's no need for a central computer to share, obviously.

  • E2500 as an additional access point will not connect

    Hello,
    I have AT&T Uverse which provides Internet for my home.  The wireless capability of this router is pretty bad, I don't get good/reliable wireless reception upstairs in my office.  The solution was to buy a Cisco E2500 and add it as an access point upstairs.
    I have the E2500 LAN port connected to the LAN port of my uverse router downstairs.  DHCP is turned off on the E2500.  I have my office PC wired into the E2500.  The home PC works fine, its getting DHCP from the uverse router downstairs and connects and good speeds.  The problem comes with my wireless devices trying to connect to the E2500. 
    I should mention that yesterday when i bought this, all worked fine.  This morning when I came into my office none of the wireless devices would connect to the E2500 at all.   But as soon as I remove the cable that connects the E2500 to the uverse router downstairs they will connect via wireless but of course not get an IP address since that is disabled.  No idea what is going on here.
    I have factory reset the E2500 and uverse router several times and am getting no where.   Any ideas what could be causing the wireless devices to not connect at all?

    I think you are having problems because you didn't give the E2500 an appropriate static IP address outside of your Uverse gateway's DHCP range.
    A better option would be to reset the E2500 to factory defaults and then follow these bridge mode intructions:
    http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/GetArticle.aspx?docid=28cee6a2fb0d4176a2210942d1d5836c_Setting_up_the_...
    You should give the E2500 seperate (different names) SSID's and make sure your wireless channels are different on AT&T gateway and E2500.  Use 1, 6, or 11
    The best option, however, would be to reset the E2500 to factory defaults and use the IP passthrough feature on your AT&T gateway.  If you use the IP passthrough feature on the  AT&T gateway, you would use internet connection type DHCP on the E2500 and it would be functioning as a NAT router.  The IP passthrough feature on you AT&T gateway allows your E2500 to receive a public IP address and you will be able to avoid the AT&T gateway's NAT.  So you will just be using the E2500's NAT.  You will need to change the MTU to manual and you can ask AT&T what the appropriate mtu is for Uverse.

  • Mail for Exchange - Access Point question

    Hello,
    When setting up Mail for Exchange, you need to input the Access Point.  I cannot find an option to select "Ask for Access Point" or something along that line.
    I use wireless access points and when I go from one spot to another I have to change my settings just to sync.
    Does anyone know of an option, if not how could I file for a feature request?

    The specific problem can be resolved. How did you hard reset your phone? You should hard reset your phone (some key combination which I cannot remember, press four keys simultaneously). Then format mass memory. Reinstall the firmware. Otherwise let Nokia Care reflash your phone. I had issues with freezes when I hung up a call, but that was resolved when Nokia Care reflashed my phone. 
    My phone is currently broken, so I cannot help you further.
    Erik

  • Problems probing for rogue access points

    Hello,
    I have a situation where I am trying to locate a rogue AP in one of my office buildings. When I bring a laptop over there with NetStumbler or Inssider, I get no response from any access points or clients. Its like that throughout the entire building. However when I leave the building, the AP start to come up but I cant get near them.
    I have another build that we have as well and the probing works just fine. Would there be a controller template or access point template that would be causing this problem?
    Here is what I am running:
    Cisco 4400 controller with firmware 4.2.130.0
    Cisco 4400 controller with firmware 5.0.148.0
    Cisco WCS 5.1.64.0
    The access points that are connected to the controller with a firmware of 4.2.130.0 is the one that seems to be stopping my attempts with probing. So far my searching for causes has not turned up anything=(
    Any help would be greatly appreciative.

    What are you seeing in the logs? Are the two controllers being used as primary and secondary? You should keep the code the same, just in case ap's move to the other controller?
    When you see a rouge ap, it will also state which ap's are hearing that rouge ap and the signal strength. If you see it -86db or worse, then it is outside of your building most likely.

  • Does Cisco Prime have support for HP Access Points?

    I am trying to sell a solution to a client with dozens of large warehouses with a large existing HP wireless solution.  I want to sell them on a Cisco wireless solution involving Prime to manage/monitor their current HP Access Points while we do a phased replacement to Cisco WLC and APs.
    I cannot find listed in the documentation whether Cisco Prime has support for the HP access points though.  I see it has 'some' support listed for some Aruba controllers, but not anything else.

    I am trying to sell a solution to a client with dozens of large warehouses with a large existing HP wireless solution. I want to sell them on a Cisco wireless solution involving Prime to manage/monitor their current HP Access Points while we do a phased replacement to Cisco WLC and APs.
    Prime will only support products with a "Cisco" logo.  
    Note:  Prime 2.2 will start supporting Meraki product.

  • Poe for 1524 access points

    Hi,
    I had a basic question about PoE operation on 1524 ap's. They have two Poe ports; poe out and poe in.
    If the 1524 will be connected to a PoE supported switch like 3750, which port should the UTP cable be connected from 1524 towards the switch port, PoE OUT or PoE IN?
    lastly, if the 1524 is connected via UTP to a PoE supported switch, does it need power injectors.
    Appreciate all help.

    Hey,
    The access point supports an Ethernet uplink port (POE-In) and a downlink port (POE-Out). The access point's Ethernet uplink port uses an RJ-45 connector (with weatherproofing) to link the access point to the 10BASE-T, 100BASE-T, or 1000BASE-T network. The Ethernet cable is used to send and receive Ethernet data and to optionally supply inline 56-VDC power from the power injector. The minimum length of this cable must be not less than 10 feet (3 meters).
    The access point's downlink Ethernet port uses an RJ-45 connector (with weatherproofing) to provide LAN connectivity and IEEE 802.3af power to a peripheral customer device, such as a camera or sensor gateway. The BVI MAC addresses are printed on the label on the side of the access point
    To provide inline PoE, you must use the 1520 series power injector. Other power injectors, PoE switches, and 802.3af power sources cannot provide adequate power, which may cause the access point to malfunction and cause over-current conditions at the power source. You must ensure that the switch port connected to the access point has PoE turned off.
    Hope This Helps.

  • AP 1231G: Two listing in Netstumbler for Cisco access point

    Hi
    We are having problems with an Access Point deployed in our infrastructure. An anominally, we are experincing, is our access point shows two listings in netstumbler. One shows the SSID and channel, the other shows the MAC of the lan connection, the host name of the AP and the IP assigned to the AP.
    How do we disable the lan side from showing up? We have twelve deployed and this is the only one showing this anominally.
    thanks you

    Are you associated to that AP by any chance?

Maybe you are looking for