5760 WLC compatability with 887 routers in unified mode

Hi,
I was wondering if cisco 5760 WLC is compatible with APs in 887 router when switched to unified mode? It seems like WLC is rejecting it says unsupported AP
Cheers

Not supported.
Here is the supported AP list as of IOS-XE 3.6.0 (1700 & 1570 series support added in 3.7.0E)
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/technology/5760_deploy/CT5760_Controller_Deployment_Guide/Supported_Features.html#pgfId-1071753
HTH
Rasika
**** Pls rate all useful responses ****

Similar Messages

New MacBook Pro compatibility with 2Wire routers

Just saw another member posted a topic regarding about the new MBP's kernel panic error with specific routers.
I have a 2Wire 1000SW series and wanting to know if the newer generations (2.33 or 2.4GHz models) will be compatible while connecting to it via WIFI.
Currently I am still on a PB, and often time there's signal problem with the 1000SW, like for example it will not able to connect to internet after system startup or wake up even though the indicator shows full bar. All my other PC notebooks connected to the same router do not have this problem.
If anyone currently have the newer generations (2.33 or 2.4) and with a 2Wire router (especially the 1000 series). Do you see any kernel panic problem?
Thanks

I find the creative suite to be painfully slow on my MBP (17" C2D 2.33Ghz, 2GB RAM). Of course it does depend how heavy you are using it. But basically I cannot use photoshop or AE under mac OSX, it drives me nuts. FOr light projects I just switch to parallels, they usually work smoother running under parallels with only 1GB RAM allocated to windows. ANd for serious stuff I switch to bootcamp so they get the full 2GB... cant wait for CS3!

USB drive compatibility with Airport Routers. Help make database.

Please HELP.
Everyone who has a USB drive plugged into the airport directly and working, I want to assemble a database of those that work and those that fail.
And if you could not get it to work but it is ok on a powered USB hub please also give that info.
I see the question over and over about failure of the USB drive to work on a Time Capsule or Extreme (Express is not compatible).
The drive must be formatted correctly. FAT32 or Mac OS Extended (Journaled). (HFS+) are the only formats that work.. and really only the later is recommended.
Yet when people plug their drive into the airport, all correctly formatted it does not work.
There are obvious considerations..
1. Format and partition is correct.
2. Power consumption.. self powered drives may not get enough power.. actually I would not recommend using self-powered drives with any of the older version TC.. the power supply is underrated.. and even the AE power supply is far from excessive. The new version AC models have a far more powerful supply, so self powered drives should not be a problem.
3. USB chipset.. I think the problem is here. A USB drive can work fine on the Computer.. it has huge number of drivers available but the AE/TC has limited firmware space and limited number of drivers. So what I want is to find those that work and those that don't.
Info I would like.
1. Make and model.. as much info as required that a person could go out and buy that same one. ie versions maybe important.
2. Does it work directly on the AE/TC?.. yes or no.
3. Does it work via a powered hub? yes or no. Leave this blank if the answer to 2 is yes.
4. Can you please plug it into the Mac, open the system information and give me this info.
Touro Desk Pro:
Product ID:          0x1013
Vendor ID:          0x4971
Version:           0.00
Serial Number:          31001304180002200312
Speed:          Up to 480 Mb/sec
Manufacturer:          HGST
Location ID:          0xfa130000 / 5
Current Available (mA):          500
Current Required (mA):          8
Capacity:          1 TB (1,000,204,136,448 bytes)
Removable Media:          Yes
Detachable Drive:          Yes
BSD Name:          disk1
Partition Map Type:          GPT (GUID Partition Table)
S.M.A.R.T. status:          Not Supported
It will be more useful as a copy and paste.
But here is the screenshot. So you know where to find it.
5. Comments
You might want to tell us if it is terrible or slow.. or cheap and excellent.. recommend to others or stay away.
The last bit I want is to work out if any of the technical id stuff helps.
What is the USB chipset? You do not need to add the info.. I can search for it.. but when I google the Vendor ID: 0x4971 I discover this is JMicron.
If you are interested then please you can add it as well.
There is a lot of info around the web.. look for reliable source.
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/smartmontools/wiki/Supported_USB-Devices
6. USB chipset. JMicron
Maybe we can track down the factors that are making it hard to pick devices that work and devices that don't.
At least have a list of drives known to work could be helpful.
There is a listing.. http://www.ifelix.co.uk/tech/8014.html It is way out of date.
That is the only one I know of.. but if people can point to others that is great.

These are connecting to a 3rd Gen 1TB Time Capsule.
1. Western Digital My Passport 0740
2. Yes
3. Yes
4.
Product ID:          0x0740
Vendor ID:          0x1058 (Western Digital Technologies, Inc.)
Version:          10.07
Serial Number:          575852314342315738313335
Speed:          Up to 480 Mb/sec
Manufacturer:          Western Digital
Location ID:          0x26200000 / 3
Current Available (mA):          500
Current Required (mA):          500
Capacity:          1 TB (1,000,170,586,112 bytes)
Removable Media:          Yes
Detachable Drive:          Yes
BSD Name:          disk5
Partition Map Type:          MBR (Master Boot Record)
S.M.A.R.T. status:          Not Supported
5. Purchased in 2012.
1. Sony Vaio (roughly from 2007-8)
2. Yes
3. Yes
4.
Product ID:          0x6390
Vendor ID:          0x058f (Alcor Micro, Corp.)
Version:           1.00
Speed:          Up to 480 Mb/sec
Manufacturer:          Generic
Location ID:          0x24100000 / 3
Current Available (mA):          500
Current Required (mA):          100
Capacity:          160.04 GB (160,041,885,696 bytes)
Removable Media:          Yes
Detachable Drive:          Yes
BSD Name:          disk4
Partition Map Type:          APM (Apple Partition Map)
S.M.A.R.T. status:          Not Supported
5. Purchased in 2008
1. Seagate Backup Plus for Mac SRD0SP0 1TB
2. Yes
3. Yes
4.
Product ID:          0xa013
Vendor ID:          0x0bc2 (Seagate LLC)
Version:           1.00
Serial Number:          NA5P3KTA
Speed:          Up to 480 Mb/sec
Manufacturer:          Seagate
Location ID:          0x26200000 / 3
Current Available (mA):          500
Current Required (mA):          100
Capacity:          1 TB (1,000,204,885,504 bytes)
Removable Media:          Yes
Detachable Drive:          Yes
BSD Name:          disk5
Partition Map Type:          GPT (GUID Partition Table)
S.M.A.R.T. status:          Not Supported
5. Purchased in 2013.
1. Drobo 5D
2. No.
3. No, not even on a Belkin Powered USB hub.
4.
Product ID:          0x3455
Vendor ID:          0x19b9
Version:           0.00
Serial Number:          D0B135101700078
Speed:          Up to 480 Mb/sec
Manufacturer:          Drobo
Location ID:          0x24100000 / 3
Current Available (mA):          500
Current Required (mA):          2
Capacity:          17.59 TB (17,592,186,044,416 bytes)
Removable Media:          Yes
Detachable Drive:          Yes
BSD Name:          disk4
Partition Map Type:          GPT (GUID Partition Table)
S.M.A.R.T. status:          Not Supported
5. It was working at once stage when plugged directly into the TC, but stopped.
Details here: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/6151788

Using TImed Access mode on Airport Extreme with other routers in bridge mode. Not working as expected.

I am trying to setup timed access mode on my airport extreme in order to limit the times devices can connect to my network, but I am having some trouble.
My setup is as follows Cable Modem ---> Airport Extreme ---> Netgear router
The Airport is running DHCP and the Netgear is in bridge mode. The only purpose of the Netgear is to provide a wireless access point for older b/g wifi devices. The Netgear is connected to the Airport by an ethernet cable from one of its LAN ports. All ip addresses are supplied by the Airport.
When I list a device mac number in the Airport extreme's timed access table it does seem to block the device if the device trys to connect to the airport's wireless service, but the device is still able to obtain service through the Netgear wireless service. I want the device to be blocked on both wireless networks. I thought this would work since all DHCP is on the airport. Why is the Airport allowing the device to connect when it comes in through the Netgear?
In this example the device I am trying to block is 5c:59:48:ba:28:d2.
Looking at the log on the airport I see the following entry when the device (when permitted) connects to the airport wireless
Nov 30 22:43:12
Severity:5
Associated with station 5c:59:48:ba:28:d2
If instead the device connects to the Netgear wireless I see the following log entry on the airport (this connection gets through even if the mac address above is listed as blocked on the airport)
Dec 01 10:46:29
Severity:5
Connection accepted from [fe80::223:12ff:fe29:acfe%bridge0]:54774.
It appears that the Netgear router (while bridging the network) is somehow modifying the mac address format in a way that the airport does not recognise it as the device to block.
What can I do to fix this?
Thanks.

The Netgear wireless server has control over what what devices are allowed to connect.
Unless you tell the Netgear what devices you want to allow to connect, it will allow any wireless device to connect as long as it knows the wireless network password.
IF.... .you were using two AirPort Extremes, and not a Netgear, the two Extremes would communicate to each other....so you would only have to enter Timed Access settings on one router and other AirPort would automatically pick those settings up.
But, even this was not the case until the last year or so when Apple updated firmware. A few years ago, you might have had 2 Apple AirPort Extremes on the network, but you still had to manually set up Timed Access on both devices separately.
Bottom line, you need to setup the equivalent of Timed Access on the Netgear router.

Attach WAP4410N as WGB to Cisco 5760 WLC with LWAP 3702

I have 5760 WLC with 3702 wireless infrastructure. Can i connect a WAP4410N AP as WGB to be attached to my current wifi network so i can provide connectivity to some wired devices? Any tips on doing so? And any limitation can be imposed for using this WAP instead of any other AP that are supported by WLC5760? If the wired clients are passive, configuring passive-client on WLC will work normally?

Thanks Eric for the reply, however, this AP is not expected to be controlled by WLC as you mentioned since it is not lightweight and not supported by this WLC for compatibility. But in this scenario, i'm talking about operating it in WGB mode to be attached to the unified wireless infrastructure. In this scenario, it is just attached as a client that pass the traffic of its clients to the other side.
I have noticed the below statement in this guide page (539)
http://hcsdemo.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3650/software/release/37e/consolidated_guide/b_37e_consolidated_3650_cg.pdf
When non-Cisco WGBs are used, the switch has no information about the IP address of the clients on the wired segment behind the WGB. Without this information, the switch drops the following types of messages:
• ARP REQ from the distribution system for the WGB client.
• ARP RPLY from the WGB client.
• DHCP REQ from the WGB client.
• DHCP RPLY for the WGB client.
Accordingly, if the switch will drop all this traffic, then no traffic will be passed from the WGB clients to the network ! what I’m missing here?!!!

Has anyone deployed converged access with 3850 switches and 5760 WLCs?

Has anyone deployed a converged access network architecture with 3850 switches and 5760 WLCs? I have done lots of projects with the 5508 WLCs In a centralized deployment. Basically with this design, I manage 2 logical networks as the wireless network is an overlay over the wired network. I can design firewall to segregate traffic between the wired and wireless hence I can carry both staff and guest traffic.
Now Cisco is telling us that there is new design such that the dats plane traffic can be dropped locally through the 3850 switched. I am not sold on this and have not found any recommended best practices on when should we use a converged access architecture.
Pros
With converged access, data traffic is terminated at the MA which is on the switches, hence the WLC will not be a bottleneck? This is to prepare adoption for 802.11ac?
Less hops for voice calls from user A to user B as data control traffic is dropped locally.
Cons
Now how do I segregate guest and staff traffic if my security folks say I need a firewall?
Troubleshooting wireless client mobility will be a nightmare as the 3850 switches are MA.
Pushing and upgrading code for the Code will mean upgrading the stack of switches in the LAN riser. This will be painful in a huge campus environment like an university.
Can someone convince me why would a customer choose converged access?
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

They choose CA because of the capwap termination at the switch. You can still use a 5508 and tunnel guest to a DMZ segment if you wish. You will need a 5508 though is you want to tunnel traffic to an anchor WLC.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

WLC 5760 multiple SSIDs with MAC filtering

Dear All,
I am implementing a wireless network with 5760 WLCs. The client requires a few SSIDs with MAC-based authentication. So I created different MAC filters using the commands "aaa authorization network MAC_FILTER01 local", "aaa authorization network MAC_FILTER02 local" etc
These filters are bound to different SSIDs using the commands "mac-filtering MAC_FILTER01" "mac-filtering MAC_FILTER02" etc. and users are added to their required MAC filters using the commands "username <mac-address> mac aaa attribute list MAC_FILTER01", "username <mac-address> mac aaa attribute list MAC_FILTER02" etc.
Now I am facing a serious issue - users belonging to any one MAC filter can connect to the all SSIDs. It seems like the MAC addresses added to the controller under different filter names are going to a common database, thereby providing access to users to all SSIDs irrespective of their MAC filter.
Is it a limitation of local database of 5760? Has anyone faced the same issue? How can I implement independent MAC filters bound to different SSIDs?
Thanks,
Arun John

Hi Arun,
this feature currently does not exist on the 5760. it is due to release in one of the MR's of 3.6
-Joseph

Unity 5.0 compatibility with Exchange 2010 SP2?

Has anyone out there tested Unity 5.0 (1) with Exchange 2010 SP2? Did you have any problems? I understand that Unity 5.x has gone end of maintenance, and it has not been officially been tested for compatibility with Exchange 2010 SP2 for unified messaging. I don't anticipate being able to upgrade Unity until next year, but the sytem admins want to upgrade from Exchange SP1 to SP2 sooner. Thanks.

Has anyone out there tested Unity 5.0 (1) with Exchange 2010 SP2? Did you have any problems? I understand that Unity 5.x has gone end of maintenance, and it has not been officially been tested for compatibility with Exchange 2010 SP2 for unified messaging. I don't anticipate being able to upgrade Unity until next year, but the sytem admins want to upgrade from Exchange SP1 to SP2 sooner. Thanks.

5508 as mobility anchor to 5760 WLC

I have 4 5508 WLCs in my environment now, installed at various locations. One 5508 is acting as an anchor for guest access. All other 5508s connect back to the anchor for the same SSID, the guest wireless WLAN. A new office is opening up with several new APs using a newer 5760 WLC running as an MC. Currently the 5508's do not have New Mobility enabled. I'm pretty sure I need to enable this on the anchor at least, but the question is do all 5508 WLCs need to be changed to support New Mobility; and if so, does it require any new configuration so that I don't break the guest wireless SSID? I am new to New Mobility so I am not sure what to expect. Other than rebooting a few WLCs to turn on New Mobility.
All 5508's run 7.6.130.0. The newer 5760 runs 03.06.02E.
Thanks
Jeff

OK, so to recap;
- place the 2nd WLC in the DMZ with only 1 port (set for dynamic AP management)?
- Then Anchor the guest SSID (on it's DMZ IP instead of management IP as is now)
And to make that kind of anchoring work, I have to open ports below on the firewall.. right?
UDP port 16666 for inter-WLC communication, and IP protocol ID 97 Ethernet in IP for client traffic.
and:
•TCP 161 and 162 for SNMP
•UDP 69 for TFTP
•TCP 80 or 443 for HTTP, or HTTPS for GUI access
•TCP 23 or 22 for Telnet, or SSH for CLI access
Thanks to confirm that

Cisco 5760 WLC initial config

Hi,
I am configuring up a Cisco 5760 WLC and wondering if it is required to put in a default route? In this document it says to put one in but i dont see why it is needed as it is connected to a switch via a layer 2 Trunk.
Reference:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-34430
Another question, since there is no more Dynamic Interfaces and they are replaced with Layer 2 & 3 interfaces instead. Do all Layer 2 interfaces you create require a layer 3 interface IP address to be configured also? As shown below:
Thanks

So by default the 5760 has IP routing enabled so you will need to put in a default route. A default gateway won't work unless you disable IP routing first.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

WLC 2112 with 1042 Mesh APs

Hello everybody,
I have a Mesh architecture with 2112 WLC and 1042 APs
I want just to know if I can connect one 1310 AP to the ethernet port of a mesh 1042 AP with ethernet bridging enabled.
thanks

Hello benhamzagi,
Thank you for contacting the Sales Acceleration Center (SAC) regarding your recent inquiry, Case Number 80931
Case Description:
WLC 2112 with 1042 Mesh APs
Case Solution:
Here is the compatibility Matrix link
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/5500/tech_notes/Wireless_Software_Compatibility_Matrix.html#wp118661
Or the attach tables will help you base on Release, Controller, Mesh and AP
Table 3 Controller Software Release and Controller Model Support Matrix
Controller Model
First Support
Last Support
2100
4.2.x
7.0.x
2500
7.0.x
Cat3850
3.2.0SE
4400
4.2.x
7.0.x
5500
6.0.x
5700
3.2.0SE
7500
7.0.x
8500
7.3.x
Virtual Controller
7.3.x
WiSM
4.2.x
7.0.x
WiSM2 (1 DP)
7.0.x
WiSM2 (2 DP)
7.2.x
SRE
7.0.x
Table 4 Mesh and Controller Software Releases and the Supported APs
Mesh and Controller Releases
Supported Access Points
7.4.x
1522, 1524PS, 1524SB, 1552E, 1552H, 1552I, 1552C, 1552EU, 1552CU, 1552S, 1130, 1240, 1250, 1260, 1600, 2600, 3500e, 3500i, 3500p, 3600e, 3600i, 1140, 600 OEAP, AP801, AP802
7.3.x
1522, 1524PS, 1524SB, 1552E, 1552H, 1552I, 1552C, 1552EU, 1552CU, 1552S, 1130, 1240, 1250, 1260, 2600, 3500e, 3500i, 3600e, 3600i, 3500p, 1140, 600 OEAP, AP801, AP802
7.2.11x.x
1522, 1524PS, 1524SB, 1552E, 1552H, 1552I, 1552C, 1552S, 1130, 1240, 1250, 1260, 2600, 3500e, 3500i, 3500p, 3600e, 3600i, 1140, 600 OEAP, AP801, AP802
7.2.10x.x
1522, 1524PS, 1524SB, 1552E, 1552H, 1552I, 1552C, 1552S, 1130, 1240, 1250, 1260, 3500e, 3500i, 3600e, 3500p, 3600i, 1140, 600 OEAP, AP801, AP802
7.0.2x.x
1522, 1524PS, 1524SB, 1552E, 1552H, 1552I, 1552C, 1130, 1240, 1250, 1260, 3500e, 3500i, 3500p, 1140, 600 OEAP, AP801, AP802
7.0.116.0
1522, 1524PS, 1524SB, 1552E, 1552H, 1552I, 1552C, 1130, 1240, 1250, 1260, 3500e, 3500i, 3500p, 1140, 600 OEAP, AP801, AP802
7.0.98.x
1522, 1524PS, 1524SB, 1130, 1240
6.0.202.0
1522, 1524PS, 1524SB, 1130, 1240
5.2.193.0
1522, 1524PS, 1130, 1240
4.1.192.35M (Mesh Release 3)
1505, 1510, 1522, 1524PS, 1130, 1240
4.1.191.24M (Mesh Release 2)
1505, 1510, 1522 (US, Canada, and RoW), 1130, 1240
4.1.190.5 (Mesh Release 1)
1505, 1510, 1522 (US and Canada)
As per your confirmation, I am going to close the case for this specific inquiry. We strive to provide you with excellent service. Please feel free to reach out to me or any member of the SAC team if we can be of any further assistance or if you have any other related questions in the future. We value your input and look forward to serving you moving forward.

5760 WLC Features

The release notes for the new 5760 WLC mention that "profiling and on boarding" are not yet supported.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/3.2_0_se/release_notes/OL28115_3_2_se_rn.html
Does this mean that when using ISE with Guest Server features, device profiling or guest self registration isn't supported ??

Yes It is true that 5760 does not support "profiling and on boarding". But when you use ISE for the same it will support the entire feature which you looking for.

5760 WLC and 5760 HA WLC question

Hi everyone,
I assume this information must exist... I just cannot locate it. Customer purchasing two 5760 WLCs:
1     AIR-CT5760-500-K9
1     AIR-CT5760-HA-K9
I am looking for info on how to configure these 2 WLCs to work together. How do you inform the production WLC that a HA WLC is available to sync with? Do WLCs have to be L-2 adjacent, or will HA operate at L-3? How does this HA setup work? etc.
Any help would be really appreciated.

Hi,
Any news regarding this issue?
We've have the same scenario:
1     AIR-CT5760-500-K9
1     AIR-CT5760-HA-K9
Both running
IOS XE 03.03.01SE
I've activated Global AP Failover Priority in both WLC and from a total of 47 APs, i've configured 8 with Priority Critical, 7 APs with Priority High and 3 APs with Priority Medium.
We've issued an reload to the primary WLC and it took 7 minutes for the APs recover from the Secondary to the Primary
13:14 - reload issued on the primary WLC
13:15 - service granted by the secondary WLC (required an shut/no shut to the "Network Status" of the radio interfaces)
13:22 - service recovered to the primary WLC
Edit - Forgot to mention that the priority values mentioned above didn't show much improvement in the AP recovery time...

Windows 8 and itunes 11 compatibility with an ipod

I have itunes11 and Windows 8. I've called Apple and I've talked to Microsoft. This was months ago. I can download itunes and run it from my laptop but am unable to sync my ipod. I get an error and it automatically reboots my computer. I was told there were known compatibility with itunes and Windows 8. This was months ago.
I know how to downgrade itunes to XP or Win 7. This is not the issue. I can download to my laptop and place, it will not sync to my ipod device (which is a fear years old), but when I did talk to support I was told that it was supported. The ipod was not the issue.. It was the incompatibility between the programs.
I see recent updates in the support community in the past month about production resolution but this still has not resolved my issue. I don't believe purchasing a new ipod is going to resolve the issue either.
If anyone has successfully developed a workaround or recently downloaded itunes11 w/ Windows 8 and can sync to an apple ipod I would love to know how you did it.
Kia
[email protected]

Im not sure that will solve the issue I have with itunes. I have a lenovo laptop and I think it's just an issue with Apple who has to modify the program for users of Windows 8 so that itunes can be used and to find purchased music. I found the music I purchased through itunes but it's not the full tracks. It said it allows me to download it fully so I can hear the whole track, but needs some kind of capatibility? I have no idea what the problem is. If someone has the answer knowing my computer brand and having windows 8 compatibility issues, please let me know what you suggest.

Is adobe photoshop cs2 compatable with windows 8?

Is adobe photoshop CS2 compatable with windows 8?

I have removed and re-installed CS2 twice now and still get the same library application error.
DO NOT INSTALL WINDOWS 8 ONTO YOUR COMPUTER IF YOU WANT TO KEEP CS2!
Telling us to spend more money to upgrade our software to meet OS does not show trust to the users. CS2 should be able to work with new OS systems and if not users should be allowed to update their current program for free to be able to use it on the new OS.
Thank you,
Eric

5760 WLC compatability with 887 routers in unified mode

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for