5D mark III lens correction problem with dark shots

Just found a new irritating problem with 5D mark III and Lightroom 4 (currently on 4.2). I shot quite a few shots in the dark over the weekend using high ISO (6400-16000), with EF 24-70 f/2.8L. If I enable the lens profile correction on the dark shots, the corners of the images all develop incredibly strong purple haze that renders the image unusable. Not enabling the correction allows me to use the images just fine. Also images that were shot with similar settings but were shot inside, with more light, don't have the purple fringing issue. Makes me wonder if this is some incompatibility between Canon's high iso noise reduction system and Lightroom's RAW processing when it does lens corrections.
Anyone else seen this?

Sulka Haro wrote:
Replicated the shot under a heavy blanket -> yes, the exposure looks the same. Whatever is causing the corner to be noisier than rest of the exposure doesn't seem to be caused by light.
At that very high of ISO you are actually seeing small differences in the sensor chip temperature due to heat from the electronics in the camera. The small amount of increased noise you're seeing in the corner at ISO 25600 is insignificant.
Sulka Haro wrote:
Interestingly enabling long exposure compensation doesn't seem to do very much to really improve the shots at these sensitivities. When enabled, the exaggerated corner noise does disappear, but also it looks like some areas in the middle of the exposure become more noisy with non-uniform noise blotches appearing instead of fairly uniform slightly higher noise pattern.
I haven't needed to use Long Exposure Noise Reduction with my 5D MKII, so have no firsthand experience. My guess is that at very high ISO settings (above 6400) a lot of what your are seeing is random noise or "shot noise," which changes from frame to frame. This causes the dark frame subtraction to "fail" in the way you are seeing. Just a guess.
There is an excellent 5D MKIII review that compares noise reduction with several other high-end camera models. The reviewer also states,
"The 5D Mark III's ISO 51200 and 102400 remain a complete mess even with strong noise reduction applied - You have to be desperate to use these settings. ISO 12800 and 25600 remain very marginal for my uses. I always shoot in the lowest standard ISO setting that will allow me to get my desired shot, but begin to cringe when settings above ISO 3200 must be employed. Your standards and applications may be different."

Similar Messages

  • 5d mark III front focus problem

    my 5d mark III has a problem with front focus. I use only crosstype focus points but even cental one can't focus correctly no matter what lens I use. the problem is more significant further the subjet focused on is. tried different light conditions with the same result. Camera always front focusing significantly, so the suject is out of DOF all the time. tested lenses 50/1.4 and 24-70/2.8 L. problem persist in all AI modes (focus/servo). please could you provide any solution? thanks in advance

    See:  http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2008/12/this-lens-is-soft-and-other-myths
    Your 5D III will let you adjust some thing called "Autofocus Micro-adjustment" (AFMA).  You can either do this gloally (for all lenses) or you can do it on a per-lens basis.
    Although... if EVERY lens needs it... and needs a LOT of it... I think you might prefer to send the camera to Canon for correction.
    Tim Campbell
    5D II, 5D III, 60Da

  • Are any patches in the works to correct problems with Maverick

    Is apple trying to correct problems with Maverick?

    Donald Morgan wrote:
    Remember there should be NO OTHER APPLICATIONS RUNNING when you do an update or Upgrade.
    It really should not matter for an OS upgrade or update if other apps are running when you begin. All the actual installing of files is done by the system user (also known as root or superuser) after all regular users are logged out, which of course terminates all user processes.

  • HT5429 Is apple working on correcting problems with there maps?

    Is apple working on correcting problems with their maps?

    Maps are being updated and improved continually. You can help by submitting Probelm Reports.

  • HT201210 How to correct Problems with cross connections

    How to correct Problems with cross connections

    Nope not a wrg #, its been a call frm my mom, my son and my brothers that show on my ph, numbers that have been programmed in for years. Thanks  

  • How do I correct problems with my trackpad were it is either unresponsive to my finger as a mouse or the cursor appears to move on its own at times?

    How do I correct problems with my trackpad where it is either unresponsive to my finger as a mouse or the cursor appears to move on its own at times?

    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1248
    Reset SMC.     http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3964
    Choose the method for:
    "Resetting SMC on portables with a battery you should not remove on your own".
    If these steps do not help, contact Apple.

  • Canon 5d mark iii camera raw files with CS3

    Hi, I recently bought a Canon 5d mark iii camera and am having difficulty viewing the raw files on my Mac. The Mac operating software is 10.5.8 and the mac doesnt have intel. Photoshop software is CS3. I have looked at various plug ins but am struggling to find one that will work. Is there no option to me other than buying a new laptop with the latest photoshop or is there a workaround?  Thanks in advance for your help, Mike

    Here's the bottom line:
    You will never be able to open the image files from your Canon 5d mark III directly in CS3, because that camera model was first supported in Camera Raw 6.7 (which only works with CS5) and 7.1 which only works with CS6.
    However, you can download the free Adobe DNG Converter 7.1 and convert your Canon raw files to raw DNGs that you can open with any version of ACR starting with ACR 2.4, which takes you all the way back to CS1.  Therefore, you'll be able to open them in CS3 with no problem.
    Get the latest version of the Adobe DNG Converter, it is a stand-alone application that is not tied to whatever version of Photoshop you happen to use.  The current version is 7.1 and there's also a beta version 7.2RC1.
    Yes, if you can afford a Canon 5D Mark III, you can afford to upgrade from CS3 to CS6 for very little money ($199 for a perpetual license) if you act fast.  CS3 will be out of the upgrade loop in late December or so.
    I'm one of the many to whom the prospect of buying into Adobe's subscription mode and end up paying the Adobe tribute every month for life seems nothing less than repulsive.
    With that camera (a rich man's camera) is silly to be using a laptop (a beggar's machine).  Get a decent desktop Mac or PC already! 

  • Problems with dark Artifacts on images when viewed on PC screens???

    I have a very urgent problem concerning Adobe Photoshop CS3, my Apple Cinema 20 inch Display and my SpyderPro2 on my Mac Pro Intel Dual Core Xeon 2x 2.66GHz.
    I have been using the Spyder for some years now, but recently I have been having big problems with the results. I only use Photoshop CS3 to enhance digital products images.
    I have a major contract with a jewellery company in London, where I clean up digital photos. Images that I have lightened up to look great on my Cinema Display have been reported by my client to look pretty dark on their PC's in their offices.
    Some of these images show lines and grubby patches??? To check this I opened files in Photoshop and moved the levels 'black' slider down quite some way, and did see evidence of what the client could see at their end? It seems that when I have used a faded eraser brush it leaves a light patch in between the shadows of the jewellery. This shouldn't be visible to the naked eye though?
    I must point out that when I use the eyedropper tool on images, to read the amount of grey or colour in the white areas around the peices, I am shown values of 1,2 or 4 maximum in the CMYK values. 4 percent out of 100 is nothing and should not be visible to the naked eye?
    How is it that my clients PC's can see dark shadows and where my eraser brush has rubbed out???
    I have tried many re-calibrations and also tested all of my older calibrations dating back a few years. I have also tested the same faulty images on Intel iMac's, an eMac, and a few PC's. On the iMac's I can just about make out the artefacts that my client can see, but nothing that I would deem as unacceptable.
    I am at a loss as to the fault, but It may be the Spyder2 Pro's inability to calibrate my Apple Cinema display properly? I may lose my contract which I cannot afford to do, and I simply have to find the cause ASAP.
    I have my Mac's in my office apartment next to two bay windows. I have vertical blinds there. When calibrating I have always turned off all the lights and pulled the blinds right back so that only the light from the two large window doors is coming in.
    For graphic design the calibrations seemed to be okay for quite some time, but recently it is getting harder to achieve good results with the Spyder? This could affect all of my workflow which is very serious. But I must stress that overall the Spyder results are not terrible. I can see good colours and dark levels and in general across all of my calibrated profiles, the jewellery looks acceptable on my Cinema Display?
    I did say to my clients that they should calibrate their PC screen properly but their offices have many Screens and they all show the same artefacts (some much worse than others)? I know that PC Screens are darker than Mac's but a 4% grey should not be visible????
    As these are a web company the images will be seen by PC users around the world and most of these will have no calibration on their screens. What can be done to prevent this and what is the cause of this? I can't possible please everyone, but as a creative professional I have to be 100% certain that my workflow is at its best.
    I need urgent help to solve this or loose valuable business? I hope that you are able to help solve this mystery. Could this possibly be something with Photoshop?
    I have just purchased the new Spyder3 Pro which I hope will give perfect results but I have to find out what the cause of this is. If some of the fault lies with the client, I can charge these for all the testing and calibrating I have done.
    Kind regards,
    Jason Conway
    ideo-sync - inspired design.

    Thanks for all your comments and so quickly.
    To be clearer, I am not working in CMYK for image enhancing at all, but windows RGB in photoshop, which is darker than working CMYK or Monitor RGB. I just use the CMYK colour scale in the photoshop colour picker window to see what values are around the object.
    its not 4 across all four but on average C4, M2, Y1, K0.
    When saving in save for web the images look fine on my screen, pretty much the same as the photoshop tiff file.
    Each image has adobe RGB 1998 embedded when saved as a tiff file.
    The client looks on internet explorer 7 on their PC's and also within Photoshop.
    Colour settings within photoshop are using MacUser magazine's recommended setting from 2006: RGB: Adobe RGB 1998, CMYK: Euroscale Coated V2, Grey: Generic Grey, SPOT: 20% dot gain. Engine: Apple CMM, Intent: Relative Colorimetric. Also Black point compensation and User Dither are checked.
    Also the monitor calibration is set at 6500 at 2.2 gamma.
    To be clearer about the dark shadowing and the artefacts. When using levels I click on a shadow point to remove all but a slight shadow. Then I sometimes need to use the faded eraser to clean up or lessen the shadow. The image looks fine on my screen, but in the levels window I drag the black pointer about a third of the was across the screen to simulate what the client is seeing on their screen. This is quite a long way to drag the slider. I can sometime see the edges of the image, or white holes where the eraser has been. The lines are areas around the object that have been rubbed out a bit.
    I agree that colour values will show on a screen, but the effect of the shadow should be smooth and not clearly visible with an edge?
    http://www.ideo-sync.co.uk/p110741.jpg
    also p110741.tif
    I have uploaded the layered tiff file and the web jpeg to my server, so you can hopefully see something odd?
    If there is a problem with my cinema display at least its under warranty, and the new Spyder3 pro should help when it arrives in a few days time.
    Hopefully I can pinpoint the exact cause to this and take steps to stop this ever happening again. I am very grateful for your advice and help.
    Kind regards,
    Jason.

  • Problem with Dark Room theme.

    I have created a homepage in iWeb 3.0.1 with the Dark Room theme (web.me.com/jmsuijkerbuijk). Everything looks fine (that is: the way I intended) in Safari 4.0.3 and OmniWeb 5.10.1, incomplete in Opera 10.00 and Camino 1.6.10, and plain terrible in Firefox 3.5.3 (you really don't want to know the result in Internet Explorer under Parallels!).
    The problem is manifest with pictures that are titled and/or drop a shadow. In both Opera and Camino the shadows are missing; in Firefox the shadows are present, but are not titled with the picture itself, which returns a ridiculous result.
    Is there something I can do to have all or most browsers show proper imaging? Thanks in advance!

    Camino 1.6.10, however, has problems rendering the pages in a number of areas. I don't worry about Camino as it's not used by many.
    There are just two pages that look to have problems with Firefox 3.5.3. The Biography and Score Samples. The photos have both a drop shadow and reflection. The drop shadow is misbehaving. However, on the Welcome page there appears to be both a reflection and drop shadow on the three image and they look fine. The difference is that those three are links. Don't know if that has anything to do with it.
    Opera just doesn't support the java script create drop shadows. As for IE you'll have to really dummy down the site to get it to work with IE. Roddy has a number of posts and a site that gives many tips on making a site more compatible with IE.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2021995&tstart=0
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1837981&tstart=0
    http://www.iwebformusicians.com/WebMusic/iWebandInternetExplorer.html
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9375447#9375447
    OT

  • Why is it suddenly impossible to import raw files from my canon 1ds mark III? I work with a mac 5. Nothing has been changed in the settings...

    I've been working for 2 years with Lightroom and importing pictures from my canon 1ds mark III
    Suddenly it doesn't work. Can somebody explain this or help me to change something
    so I can import my photos???

    import raw file default wrote:
    When Im trying to import photos Lightroom says it not all import results are possible.
    As DJ suggests, that's probably not the exact wording. Can we have that, please?
    Still need your OS and Lightroom version too.

  • Will Canon 5d Mark III Raw files work with Lightroom 3

    I have just tried to upload Raw files from a Canon 5d Mark III to Lightroom 3.  The file were not recognised.  I believe there were some update issues but my Lightroom 3 is updated.  Do I need to get Lightroom 4?  I need to know urgently as I have a shoot tomorrow and will go back to my Mrk II if I can't get an update for Lightroom 3.
    Message title was edited by: Brett N

    LR3 DOES NOT support Canon 5D3, 1Dx, Nikon D800 or Nikon D4.
    Newer cameras wont work in it, and require LR4 for RAW processing (Tethering in LR4 STILL is not supported)
    However,
    LR4 is massively buggy, and slow to a point where it is practically unuseable for anything other than a handful of images to edit.
    Also, LR4 will not tether to the new cameras (for that, try ANY of the competing professional software, Aperture, Capture One - They work just fine)
    You can, convert your 5D3 files to DMG, and then open them in LR3 that way, or you can get LR4 and deal with it's massively awful slow issues that Adobe has still not resolved 5.5 months after launch, or you can use other software.
    Those are your options.

  • Using PS CS5.  Cannot open Raw files with new Canon EOS 5D Mark III.  Works fine with Mark II.  Any answers?

    Current camera raw is 6.6.

    Support for the 5D Mark III was added in ACR 6.7:
    Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Macintosh : Camera Raw 6.7.1 Update
    Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Windows : Camera Raw 6.7.1 Update
    Benjamin

  • Lens Correction Problem

    I'm using a Nikon D3 and Nikon professional lenses which are all recognised by the Photoshop CS5 (12.04) lens Correction function when inputting RAW images.
    But...
    If I process any of my RAW files through Photomatix (saving as JPG) and then open them in CS5 the lens correction function only recognises the images as having come from a Nikon Coolpix camera and I'm not given the option of selecting a Nikon D3 and associated lenses.
    I can understand that there's some loss of functionallity due to the processing through Photomatix but I would have hoped that I would have been given the option to 'override' the lens correction feature and force it to recognise the Nikn D3 I'm using.
    This isn't possible, or is it?
    Any help/advice would be very welcome...
    Richard

    See if selecting Nikon Corporation instead of Nikon from the camera make drop-down menu makes a difference.

  • Lens correction works with my RAWs, but not my JPEGs?

    Hi all, if I check "Enable Profile Corrections" for any of my RAW files, Lightroom automatically identifies the Make/Model/Profile of my lens. However for my JPEG files (same camera, same lens) when I check "Enable Profile Corrections" it defaults to none/none/none, and my lens doesn't even show up in the dropdown menus if I try to select it manually.
    How can I get Lens Correction to work for JPEGs as it does for RAWs?

    Update, got it working, sweet! I'll post what I did below, hopefully useful to somebody...
    1) Probably the best thing would be to make my own Lens Profile -- http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/lensprofile_creator.html -- but I'm not quite ready for that now, I just wanted to make the built-in RAW profiles work for JPEG too.
    2) I located the RAW profiles I wanted available as JPEG profiles, in this folder:
    C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\[MyCamera]\
    3) In this folder:
    C:\Users\[USER]\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\
    4) I created the following subfolder:
    C:\Users\[USER]\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\[MyCamera]\
    5) I copied the RAW profile files from #2 above into this new folder.
    6) I set the files to not be "read-only"
    7) I opened those files into a text editor, and I performed a Find/Replace.
    From: <stCamera:CameraRawProfile>True
    To: <stCamera:CameraRawProfile>False
    (Note that there are multiple instances, so I performed a Find/Replace ALL.)
    8) I set the files back to "read-only" (probably not necessary)
    And now when I turn on Lens Correction for a JPEG, it works! And it seems like my camera isn't performing any lens corrections (such as vignetting) when saving JPEGs, so it's pertty good as-is. Though, per #1 above, probably the best solution would be to make my own Lens Profiles from scratch.
    Thanks to all & I hope this helps somebody...

  • I can not get my i-tunes to play correctly, problem with library I think.

    I have had this problem for a really long time and I don't know how to fix it. I can open my i-tunes but when I click to play a song it freezes up and says "i-tunes1 not responding." the only way I can get i-tunes to work is to go into programs and repair it.
    I think it is a problem with my library, because I have a folder named i-tunes with my songs in it and a folder named i-tunes1 with my i-tunes library and i-tunes media folder in it. There is nothing in my i-tunes media folder. I have tried consolidating my library and stuff but nothing seems to work. Any suggestions?

    How many computers  do you have authorized to use your Apple ID. There is a limit of 5 computers. Mobile devices are counted differently from computers.
    Please see Authorize your Mac or PC using iTunes.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to call a subclass method.

    Hi: I am trying to call a method from the subclass. I get many errors. Please correct the following code. public abstract class A{ private int id; public static void main(){ A obj = new B(200); obj.subclassMethod; class B extends A{ public void subcl

  • Images on a website don't show, while they do in Safari

    This webpage shows a bunch of small graphics, connected by lines. The content does not show at all in Firefox 4 and the problem started showing in the last two Firefox 3 updates. Safari loads the page no problem. I do use the noscript plugin, but the

  • Transferring music and videos from Time Capsule to ATV??

    Can you transfer content from the Time Capsule to the ATV directly? I have many songs and tv shows that I have saved on my Time Capsule so as to not take up space on my Macbook Pro. It seems like a pain to have to bring that content onto my laptop th

  • HT1338 My ipod froze up. I cant do anything not even turn it off.HELP.

    My ipod froze. I can not torn it off. I cant do anything. It has changed pic and dates by itself. Is it dead? Do I need to get a new one? If you could help me figue this problem out it would be Greatly Appreciated.

  • Subscreen closing on vertical scroll

    Hi , I am  having an issue where the modal dialog box is closing on vertical scroll.Suppose the main screen is 1000 and the subscreen is 2000.What attributes should be maintained for screen 2000 to avoid this. Is there a problem with the table contro