60d soft focus issues

I've had my 60d 8 months and within the last month or so I've been experiencing soft focus. I've tried different lens so it's not my lens. I have it set on AF and not manual and am still having the less than crisp images being produced. Any suggestions or ideas? 
Thanks

This actually isn't bad... it needs a little TLC in Lightroom but the data is there and it doesn't look very soft (at least in this reduced size).
Here's what the EXIF data tells me (there's more but I'm just pasting the exposure info):
Camera: Canon EOS 60D
Lens: EF-S10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Shot at 20 mm
Exposure: Auto bracket exposure, Aperture priority AE, 1/30 sec, f/22, ISO 200, Compensation: +1
I can see you're using aperture priority (good!)
I can see you set the f-stop to f/22 using a 20mm lens.  What I can't see (because the lens doesn't provide the data) is the focused distance.
I can tell you that when using this camera with that lens at 20mm and f/22, the "hyperfocal" distance is a mere 3.12 feet... meaning if you focused to 3.12' then everything from about 1.5' to infinity would be in acceptable focus.
At f/22 you're going to be getting some diffraction issues... mostly these will only be noticeable if you zoom to 100% (e.g. large prints).  But small image sizes wont reveal them.  At 20mm using f/11 the hyperfocal distance becomes 6.17' (I have an app to look this up) and everything from 3' to infinity would be in focus... but with substantially less diffraction (diffraction is based on laws of physics and lens quality has no bearing on it... the math for calculating diffraction assume "perfect" optics.)  Diffraction is related to the wave-nature of light and what happens when you put light through small openings.  Light doesn't technically focus to a single "point"... it focuses to a spot known as an "Airy disk" (named for the astronomer, George Airy, who discovered it.)  It turns out the smaller the aperture size (larger f-stops) the larger the size of this spot.  There comes a point where it's not only larger than a single pixel... it may be larger than several pixels.
ANOTHER issue I notice is that your shutter speed is 1/30th second in this shot.  If you're on a tripod that's probably not a big deal.  But if you are hand-holding the camera... it's tough (though not impossible) to hold the camera stady enough to have no effects of camera motion causing some blur.  Even "mirror slap" vibration can be a problem if a tripod isn't solid or if you've got windy conditions blowing the camera while it's trying to take the shot.
Lightroom will let you apply some sharpening to tighten up the shot.
I messed with this just briefly using Nik Vivezza... brought down the exposure a bit, reduced exposure on the clouds and boosted contrast in clouds to create more contrast.  Reduced exposure on the highlighted area of the hills.  Also applied overall sharpening.  The whole thing actually improves considerably and this is with the reduced resolution JPEG.  You could work wonders on this with the RAW image (btw, if you're shooting landscapes.... always shoot in RAW and let Lightroom deal with the RAW to JPEG conversion.  You'll get MUCH more data and far more adjustment latitude that way.
If you want to have fun with this, post the full size version (preferably RAW if you have it as a RAW) somewhere then (a) provide a link and (b) invite people to try their hand at processing it for you and I think you'll be quite suprised at how good some of the results will be.  
Tim Campbell
5D II, 5D III, 60Da

Similar Messages

  • Soft Focus Images From Canon EOS 1D Mark IIn

    I am viewing soft focus issues with my RAW CR2 files coming from the above camera body. I accidentally opened a file in Canon's Digital Photo Professional and it was razor sharp compared to Aperture. A few historical facts. I have had the camera body calibrated to my multiple L lenses several times. I am using the latest firmware for the camera at 1.1.2 and the latest version of the OS at 10.4.10, Aperture 1.5.4, and DPP at 3.0.2. I have used another identical body model with one of my lenses with the same results. I have viewed this issue on several Macs and displays. I have done controlled sample shots using a Digital Imaging Box where the camera is mounted firmly to it with a two second timer to avoid camera shake and controlled lighting with the same results. This all leads me to how Aperture is handling the CR2 file. Now I am talking about viewing only at 100% magnification. There is NO adjustments done at this point which should rule out the RAW processor engine. Like you all I have moved my entire VERY LARGE library and complete workflow to Aperture and now have serious doubts if I can use this awesome application. Has anyone else experienced this? I have tried Apple directly, other forums, other photographers, etc. with no real answer. Since this is my first post, I can not figure out how to attach screen captures so you can clearly see the difference. I can send them via PM if required. All of your help is greatly appreciated!
    Cheers,
    David

    What do you mean sharp "out of the camera?"
    This is a RAW file? Note JPEG files will almost always be sharper out of the camera than will RAW files. JPEG files have post-processing (color space applied, sharpening applied) out of camera when RAW files do NOT.
    It is very likely you have different settings enabled in DPP and Aperture. With Aperture you can do sharpening in the RAW conversion step, or via edge sharpening... and doing a comparison on "sharpness" before you have applied this really makes no sense.
    NO RAW files are sharp out of camera (well, unless they're from a MF digital back) because all DSLRs have an anti-aliasing filter in them which purposely blurs images. This is done to eliminate artifacting and to increase the effective resolution of the camera (because note that a 12 MP digital camera actually only has 6 million green, 3 million blue, and 3 million red sensors). It does not have 12 million RGB capable sensors, which requires some math, etc., in camera.

  • Is there a fix for 5d ii focus issue

    Hello,  I just purchased the 5Dii used but the owner said the camera was working perfectly. I notice that when I take photos the photos do not look sharp. I am shooting in raw and using fast enough settings that they should be sharp. I tried different lenses and a tripod still same results when viewed at 100%. So I have been reading about the 5d ii having focus issues and was wondering if there is a fix to this problem? Also, I read that with 21 mp the photos won't look sharp in the view finder or when viewed at 100% has anyone else heard this?  Any suggestions would be helpful. I am thinking I need to return the item which is a shame, I was so excited to get the 5d ii and very disappointed to be having this issue.  

    I don't suggest using the viewfinder to judge quality of photos -- it's too small.  
    There are no focus "issues" with a 5D II -- it's an excellent camera.  It doesn't have the advanced focus system of the 5D III but if the focus points on your 5D II tell you that something is correctly focused then it should be correctly focused.
    There are NUMEROUS things that can cause problems (none of which are defects.)
    1)  If you allow the camera to auto-select it's focus point, remember that the camera will always pick the focus point which can lock focus at the closest focusing distance.  Suppose you're taking a photo of someone's face, but on the side of the frame there's a bush -- and that push is in far enough that one of the focus points is on the bush.  The camera will focus on the bush and NOT on your subject's face.  Usually you will want the camera to focus on the nearest subject, but when shooting shots with distracting elements in the frame which are closer then your intended subject, you need to pick the focus point you want the camera to use rather than allow it to auto-select the point.
    2)  If focusing at a particularly low focal ratio (especially at close distances) the depth of field can get REALLY thin.  If you want focus on your subject's eyes -- you will need to carefully position the focus point and lock focus on your subject's eyes -- otherwise you may end up getting a focus lock on their nose (as an example) and the eyes will be slightly soft.
    3)  In the default "one shot" mode, the camera will focus prior to taking the shot.  When focus lock is achieved the camera will stop adjusting focus.  If either you or your subject move after that point, the camera will NOT re-adjust -- you'll get  a soft shot.  With moderate f-stops usually a small movement wont change focus distance enough to matter -- this is mostly an issue at shallow f-stops.  But if shooting action where you KNOW your subject is moving and focus distance is changing, you need to use the "AI Servo" mode which continuosly updates focus.
    4)  Your 5D II allows you to adjust the focus accuracy of a lens.  Some lenses will routinely focus just slightly in front or behind your intended focus distance.  When you detect that you have a lens that does this, the camera can compensate.  This adjustment requires that you set up an accurate focus test to determine if an adjustment is needed and how much.  Do not attempt to make an adjustment by using regular every-day shots... use a carefully controlled focus target, tripod, etc.  There's a procedure for doing this.
    5)  If you suspect inaccuracy with focus points (and you really need to be careful to use controlled circumstances before arriving at such a conclusion) you can test by switching to "live view" mode to see if you get different results.  Live view mode does not use the phase-detect auto-focus points... it uses contrast-detection focus instead.  Contrast detection is slower but in theory should be able to provide more accurate focus as long as you have a subject with some decent contrast.  If live view is consistently outperforming the standard phase-detect AF mode then you may need to perform focus adjustment on your camera (this is specific to each lens you own... this is because each lens can behave differently.)
    Lastly... your camera records which AF points were used when it takes a photo.  This data can be displayed IF you use the Canon EOS Utility (which should have come with your camera).  It'll put the familiar focus array overlaying your photo and highlight the active point(s).  Just be aware that if you did a "focus and recompose" that the camera is going to report which focus point was used to lock focus but wouldn't know you recomposed the shot.  If you're not recomposing and your subject distance wasn't changing then the utility should be accurate.
    Incidentally, Apple's "Aperture" software also allows you to view the Canon focus point data.  As far as I'm aware, this is not available in Lightroom or Photoshop.
    Tim Campbell
    5D II, 5D III, 60Da

  • 5d mark 1 focus issues

    i am having critical focus issues with my eos 5d mark 1 in soft light without contrast.  i have the problem with all of my l series lenses.  i get a confirmation beep with the autofocus when the square i have enabled gets focus lock; however, the resluting photograph is focused at least 1-2 feet in back of where it should be.  is it possible that my mirror is out of alignment?  has anyone else had this problem?

    Have you tried using just the single center AF point in those conditions? That's the way most seem to get the best results on the forums I read. (any it applies to most Canon bodies up to the D3 / 1Dx.). I rarely shoot in low light so can't say how my cameras do, but I read a lot of messages asking for a better AF in the next  generation of whatever body they have.
    "A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought."

  • Sony HVRZ5U focusing issues

    I have used the hvr z 5u for about 2 years and getting feedback that there are focusing issues.
    Specifically, when filming a sit down interviews, the subject (usually on the left third of the frame) becomes out of focus?! I am a professional videographer with experience and trying to troubleshoot this issue. The focus on the subject is either a soft focus or general lack of focus with the focus on another part of the frame.
    All that being said, I have been told this occurs in both auto focus and manual focus ?!!
    I hope someone can explain what could be the cause. I am not sure if it is the distance to the subject, lighting, or another matter.
    Thanks!

    I would reseet the camera (reset button, top panel, beneath the LCD) and do a quick test @ 1080/60i with a fixed shutter of 1/60 and autofocus  = off. Make sure you can focus through the whole zoom range and make sure that your back focus holds (focus on distant, high contrast object, zoom all the way out, then zoom back in and verify that the focus is maintained). If this checks out you can turn autofocus on and test the autofocus tracking. It should not drift/hunt too much in a sit down interview situation with a fairly static subject and not a lot going on in the frame. If you continue to see focus issues the camera may need to be sent in and evaluated by Sony.

  • Lightroom and Windows mouse focus issues.

    In one aspect Lightroom have been always behaving different from other Windows application: Its speed of grabbing mouse focus and moving window to the foreground is exaggerated. This problem will be observed only by people using their WinXP computers in "X11 mode", like with Unix, what allows to perform interaction with processes associated with windows without ever clicking on, or raising such window. Should you be working on large computer clusters as I do, this focusing feature its a blessing.
    This how you can reproduce: Use Tweak UI to adjust the mouse behavior. Select "Mouse," step down to "X=Mouse" and check "Activation follows mouse." Do not select "autoraise."
    Now your WinXP will behave similar to the real X11 xterm with mouse having the "no raise selection" policy. Its not quite identical to xterm, but it really works perfectly in most cases.
    Except... well, except with Lightroom. Lightroom grabs the pointer and pushes the window to the foreground in splits of a second. For example, go to
    "Help|About Adobe Lightroom" to see the credit window. It appears than as usual, but since the help menu will be dismisses, the pointer stands on the main Lightroom window, what makes the credits window vanish in split of a second. No chance to see it!
    Another case: Assume that Lightroom uses almost the entire desktop down to the task bar, and your browser window is smaller. Select the browser on the taskbar and try to move mouse to it. No chance! Lightroom will take over and pop itself to the foreground again. The only solution is to minimize Lightroom. And than sometimes something happens that Lightroom will not restore itself anymore! The "Restore" operation is grayed out, one can only Maximize it. We have reported this numerous times before.
    I am aware that this problem relates only to WinXP users with X11 mouse mode, but with Lightroom reaching now a high degree of maturity, maybe we could take a look at this problem as well?

    In order to overcome most of the known navigation and/or focus issues you need to be using the following:
    <li>Forms 10.1.2.3 or newer (latest is 11.1.2). If/when you are using 10.1.2.3 you would also need to install patch ID 9593176 as this contains additional fixes for focus issues.
    <li>JRE 1.6.0_26 or newer (latest is 1.6.0_30). The latest is always recommended as it contains the most up to date fixes for both technical issues and security issues.
    Patches are only available on MyOracleSupport: http://support.oracle.com

  • Soft Focus Filter for Wedding Footage

    I have perused my filters in FCP but am not finding a nice soft focus for use in wedding videos. Am I missing the obvious or is this another software purchase?
    Thanks!

    Try this - I'd be interested to get people's views on it . . .
    Copy the clip to the track above (so the top clip is identical to the one below) and use the Gaussian Blur Filter (quite heavily) on the top clip. If you want, you can also lighten the top clip with one of the Colour Correctors - blow the highlights etc if you like.
    Then adjust the opacity of the top clip to suit your taste . . . Cool?
    Play around with it, then let me know.
    The idea is, the original clip's still sharp - but you get that dreamy, hazy look because of the top clip - and it's VERY controllable.
    Andy
    Quad 8GB. 250+500 HDs. G-Raid 1TB. NORTON. FCP 5.1.2. Shake 4.1. Sony HVR Z1E   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  
    "I've taught you all I know, and still you know nothing".

  • Mouse Focus Issues

    hi,
    Are there any known mouse focus issues in r12 (r12.6) ?
    we have couple of users who have these problems. this isn't with all but few of them.
    thanks,
    jazz

    Jazz,
    Review the following documents, and see if it helps.
    Note: 457136.1 - On R12 Application, Randomly The Mouse Navigation Stops Working
    https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=457136.1
    Note: 468724.1 - Rel 12 : Mouse Cursor Is Frozen (Loss Of Focus In Applet) After Minimizing And On Restoring the Form To Normal Size
    https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=468724.1
    Note: 824000.1 - Unable to Use Mouse Cursor After Accessed on Folder Tools box
    https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=824000.1
    Regards,
    Hussein

  • Using webutil causes focus issues

    Hello,
    Many of us are familiar with the sporadic focus issue that can occur whereby you can use the keyboard to tab around a form but not the mouse. We have an existing function in our application which uses calls to Webutil functions (WEBUTIL_FILE.FILE_SAVE_DIALOG, WEBUTIL_FILE_TRANSFER.IS_AS_READABLE, EBUTIL_FILE_TRANSFER.AS_TO_CLIENT) to mediate a CSV export of data. We've noticed, since upgrading to 10.1.2.3 and the Sun JVM, that after performing this action, the focus problems occur i.e. mouse navigation no longer works.
    Has anyone else encountered this problem..? Or even better, have a suggested solution?
    Regards,
    James
    Apps Server: Forms and Reports Server 10.1.2.3
    JVM: Sun 1.6.0_14

    I face this problem and finally get the the solution it is:
    1- make keyboard navigable property for the blob item 'no' .
    2- create any item in the block of this blob and make it navigable 'yes' and visible 'yes' and width '0' and height '0'.
    and try and isa mouse navigation will work
    Feel free to contact me to inquire anything .

  • Should I spend the $280.00 to have Canon fix my 70D auto-focusing issue?

    Should I spend the $280.00 to have Canon fix my 70D auto-focusing issue? Or just return back to my very much trusted Rebels?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    MelekalsCanon wrote:
    Very much appreciate your taking time to send a response. As a new user I wasn't sure if anyone would bother. Allow me to add a little more to my first post. I fit in that niche between amateur and a person with clients. For over 10 years I have covered events for a non-profit agency capturing the look and feel of 20+ events per year and was given permission to purchase a few cameras over the year. My decision from the beginning was to use the Canon Rebel. Images were spot on and only once did I have an issue with one of them (after shooting outside events in 105 degree temps for 3 days).
    So, when I retired a year ago it was for me a pretty simple choice to get a Canon for myself - especially since at that time the 70D was on the cover of magazines and was very highly touted. I also did a lot of desktop publishing and photo editing which helped me realize I wanted the best sensor, sharpness, resolution and lens I could afford - the 70D. My post was actually a result of reading many online responses including your very informative replies about the 70D focusing issues. My biggest concern is that I will spend several hundred dollars and maybe, just maybe get back a camera which captures better focused images, but still not as sharp as the lower end Rebels I was using. I had hoped to purchase my first "L" lens and really get excited - not repair the most expensive camera I've bought to date.
    Thanks again and before it gets noted by someone...yes, I should have pushed this issue sooner and then at least the warranty would have covered the cost. An expensivve lesson learned. But I will have to add that at least one authorized Canon repair dealer told me they have had several folks feel like I did - that it was the photographer/me as a new user having the issue and not the camera. I now know it's my camera.
    Let me clarify that I don't own a 70D, so anything I say about it is from watching what others have said, mainly in this forum. But it is disconcerting to see so much complaint about a camera that's supposed to have an innovative focusing system. One is strongly tempted to suspect that they went overboard in trying to make the camera serve both still  photographers and videographers.
    That said, I'm not a great fan of the Rebel line, because they lack autofocus microadjustment and I have at least one otherwise excellent Canon lens that would be useless without it. (The 70D does have AFMA, a point in its favor.)
    As far as spending the $280 for the repair, I understand why it's a hard call. If I were in your shoes and were convinced that Canon understands the issue and would fix it correctly and permanently, I guess I'd go for it. If you don't think they do, but fell that you need something a cut above the Rebels, this may be a good time to buy a leftover or refurbished 7D. Even though I now have a 5D3, I still use my 7D's a fair amount and have been very happy with them. And the 7D2 has gotten such a favorable reception that's it's almost bound to make more 7D's available at a decent price.
    Bob
    Boston, Massachusetts USA

  • Adobe Flash Pro CS6 -- cursor and focus issues

    This is OS specific as it works fine in the Snow Leopard.
    I am having issues with nearly everything involved with switching between apps / focusing on text windows / getting the cursor to appear where I click / etc since upgrading to Mountian Lion/Mavericks while using Flash Professional CS6. 
    Example problems:
    I click on the Flash icon in the menu bar (twice because the new Mac OS's have focus problems in the dock with mission control enabled) the OS will sometimes switch to the space containing Flash (sometimes not but let's focus on the Flash focus issues). I hover over the code window, I scroll with the mousewheel down the page to where I want to edit the code, I CLICK exactly where I want to paste it, hit cmd+C -- then it pastes the code NOT THERE but instead where the cursor was before (at the top of the page)... So essentially I have to double or triple click everything in Flash all the time. I just click like crazy anymore on everything all the time, but in Flash it's really unpredictable.
    This happens on both of my work computers (both 10.8.5)
    and my Mac Pro (10.9) but not my MacBook Pro that is still extremely fortunate enough to have 10.6 on it.

    What you need is an inner Graphic symbol. What I mean by Graphic symbol is when you select all your letters and hit "F8", choose "Graphic" instead of "MovieClip." In the properties panel, you'll see that one of the sections is called "Looping." Select"play once" (the default is "Loop"). Inside that graphic should be the animation of the letters moving in from left to right.
    On the outer timeline, put a keyframe at the same frame number where the Graphic's animation ends. Change the Looping to "Single Frame" and then type in the frame number of the last frame. You can then create a motion tween that animates the graphic symbol upward at its final frame.

  • Firefox focus issues

    Hi!
    I have a sometimes very irritating problem with Firefox. I have a Logitech G7 mouse with a tiltable wheel that I've set up to change tabs in forefox, and a sidebutton that I use to close tabs with. I'm just using xbindkeys to bind the mouse buttons to ctrl+page up, ctrl+page down and ctrl+w. The thing is that firefox sometimes seems to loose focus, and ignores keyboard commands. For example when I close my current tab with my mouse or by pressing ctrl+w, and then try to close the next tab too, it doesn't work. I have to click on another window or on the desktop to make firefox loose focus, and then click on firefox again. Then it starts working temporarily again.
    I'm using Firefox 3.0b2 from AUR right now, but I had the same problem with Firefox 2 from extra too. I use gnome with metacity. I also have a couple of plugins installed, but I have tried without any plugins too. I also have the same problem on my laptop, and both my computers use Arch64.
    So, does anyone know a solution to this? It's not such a big deal really, but I gets really annoying sometimes.

    arnuld wrote:
    Aha... and I thought I am the only with Firefox issue
    I use "wmii" and my Firefox always looses focus. In wmii, you can change to different TAGS (like Desktops in GNOME) using "ALT-#" If i have 3 tags opened and Firefox is running on tag-2 and I go to tag-3 to check my messages in pidgin and come back with "ALT-2" I do not see Firefox. I see only border of Firefox and between the border i see my background wallpaper . Clickign with mouse does not bring the focus in anyway..... Quite funny though.. It is happening very frequently , nearly all the time, even if I kill Firefox using <killall firefox-bin> or <kill -9 PID> , the problem remains as it is when I start Firefox again :\
    This also seems to be a different problem from what I'm experiencing, but it seems like there are lots of different firefox focus issues. From your description it almost seems like firefox has crashed for you, since it is no longer drawing itself. Have you tried running firefox from a terminal, to see if you get any error messages?

  • Missing smoothcam and soft focus effect

    Hi. I recently archived and reinstalled my operating system (leopard). Now when I try to make a quicktime from my timeline, it says, "unable to load softcam and smoothcam effects." Any idea why smoothcam and soft focus disappeared and anyone know how to put them back in? reinstalling final cut is a bad option -- my FC DVDs are at my parents' house (four hours away). I do have a 'previous systems' backup from the archive and reinstall and time machine back-ups...

    Check the /Library/Application Support/ProApps/Internal Plug-Ins/FxPlug folder ... if you don't see Filters.bundle and SmootCam.fxplug then you need to grab those files from the previous systems backup.
    Gotta say tho', a clean reinstall would be best.

  • Swing Applet - Internet Explorer - Focus issue - tool tips

    Hi ,
    We are using Swing applet in IE Browser , except this swing component rest of the components in the browser are HTML/DHTML components.
    and we are having issue focus issue with this swing components ,
    once immediately after launching the swing applet , the UI components are having some focus issue , if I bring the mouse on top of the swing UI components , we couldn't able to see the tooltips(flyover text) of those Swing UI components.
    However if we click some where on the Swing applet frame , we are able to see these tooltips(flyover text) .
    It looks like a kind of compatibility issue between swing and IE browser .
    I am trying to find a solution for this issue , so that once after launching the applet , tooltips will work without need to click on the applet bar.
    Can somebody share some thoughts on this issue??
    Thanks,
    Bonthu.

    As a wild guess you are mixing Swing and awt components which is a big no-no and among other things can cause repainting, refreshing issues.
    If you want more help then that you need to post some code that shows us what you are doing.

  • Soft focus in Iphoto '11?

    Hello I have a new MacBook Pro with OSX 10.8.2 and I downloaded iPhoto '11  (version 9.4.2).
    I want to do something that was very easy in older versions of iPhoto: to get a soft focus effect.  I want to get a slight blur, for a soft romantic portrait effect.
    The current version of iPhoto has an Sharpness adjustment slider.  But this slider will only increase sharpness.  I want to do the opposite.  I want to decrease the sharpness!
    Did Apple actually remove this useful feature from iPhoto?  In no, then where is it?  If yes, then my question is why remove something useful?
    Thanks,
    Peter Halverson
    PS:  I must say that the transition from OSX 10.4 (Tiger) to OSX 10.8 (Mountain Lion) has been very painful.  My most useful software had to be updated or re-purchased and much of it is simply not available.  I wish I could go back to the older OS.

    iPhoto 6 was the last verson of iPhoto to offer the Sharpness slider to go both ways, sharpen and soften. It still works with Mt. Lion.  So if you have the disks that came with your original Mac you can use   Pacifist on those disks to install iPhoto 6.  But you'll need a copy of your originla iPhoto 6 library to use or try to follow this  iPhoto Library Manager tutorial:  Fat Cat Software - iPhoto Library Manager Help - Downgrading a library to an earlier version of iPhoto.
    Personally I believe you would be ahead of the curve if you obtained a 3rd party image editor that had the softening capabilty and used it as the external editor from withing iPhoto. 
    OT

Maybe you are looking for