6140 online volume and virtual disk expansion

Hi,
I have a 6140 configured. I have created some volumes that is being used as oracle raw devoces on solaris 10. I have two doubts to confirm
1. Can I expand diskspace to the virtual disk online witout any dataloss.
2. can I expand volume with the added space online without any dataloss. (the volume is presented to the solaris 10 os and it is being used as a raw device by oracle (ASM)
Thanks and regards
Ushas Symon

Your configuration is dependent on the application's needs.
Personally, on my 14 shelves of 6140 storage, I do not want to suffer the penalty of RAID 1 mirroring (cuts the available storage size in half), as today controllers are very reliable, as are disk drives, so I use RAID 5 which offers stripping among the disks, offering more available storage and excellent performance. In three years, we haven't lost a single bit, and we are capable of ~400K TPS.

Similar Messages

  • How to remove root volume and unown disks for reuse?

    Hi,
    I have two FAS3270s in HA running OnTAP 8.1.4P7. I need to remove all volumes/aggregates including the root volume and unown all the disks so some of the shelves can be reattached to a different controller. How do I go about doing it since the root volume is needed to run? Thanks,

    All or some of the shelves from the HA pair.  If some, you are going to have to shutdown the controllers to remove the shelves..  If it's some, then you need to move /etc to a new root vol  

  • Cluster Quorum Disk failing inside Guest cluster VMs in Hyper-V Cluster using Virtual Disk Sharing Windows Server 2012 R2

    Hi, I'm having a problem in a VM Guest cluster using Windows Server 2012 R2 and virtual disk sharing enabled. 
    It's a SQL 2012 cluster, which has around 10 vhdx disks shared this way. all the VHDX files are inside LUNs on a SAN. These LUNs are presented to all clustered members of the Windows Server 2012 R2 Hyper-V cluster, via Cluster Shared Volumes.
    Yesterday happened a very strange problem, both the Quorum Disk and the DTC disks got the information completetly erased. The vhdx disks themselves where there, but the info inside was gone.
    The SQL admin had to recreated both disks, but now we don't know if this issue was related to the virtualization platform or another event inside the cluster itself.
    Right now I'm seen this errors on one of the VM Guest:
     Log Name:      System
    Source:        Microsoft-Windows-FailoverClustering
    Date:          3/4/2014 11:54:55 AM
    Event ID:      1069
    Task Category: Resource Control Manager
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      
    User:          SYSTEM
    Computer:      ServerDB02.domain.com
    Description:
    Cluster resource 'Quorum-HDD' of type 'Physical Disk' in clustered role 'Cluster Group' failed.
    Based on the failure policies for the resource and role, the cluster service may try to bring the resource online on this node or move the group to another node of the cluster and then restart it.  Check the resource and group state using Failover Cluster
    Manager or the Get-ClusterResource Windows PowerShell cmdlet.
    Event Xml:
    <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
      <System>
        <Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-FailoverClustering" Guid="{BAF908EA-3421-4CA9-9B84-6689B8C6F85F}" />
        <EventID>1069</EventID>
        <Version>1</Version>
        <Level>2</Level>
        <Task>3</Task>
        <Opcode>0</Opcode>
        <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords>
        <TimeCreated SystemTime="2014-03-04T17:54:55.498842300Z" />
        <EventRecordID>14140</EventRecordID>
        <Correlation />
        <Execution ProcessID="1684" ThreadID="2180" />
        <Channel>System</Channel>
        <Computer>ServerDB02.domain.com</Computer>
        <Security UserID="S-1-5-18" />
      </System>
      <EventData>
        <Data Name="ResourceName">Quorum-HDD</Data>
        <Data Name="ResourceGroup">Cluster Group</Data>
        <Data Name="ResTypeDll">Physical Disk</Data>
      </EventData>
    </Event>
    Log Name:      System
    Source:        Microsoft-Windows-FailoverClustering
    Date:          3/4/2014 11:54:55 AM
    Event ID:      1558
    Task Category: Quorum Manager
    Level:         Warning
    Keywords:      
    User:          SYSTEM
    Computer:      ServerDB02.domain.com
    Description:
    The cluster service detected a problem with the witness resource. The witness resource will be failed over to another node within the cluster in an attempt to reestablish access to cluster configuration data.
    Event Xml:
    <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
      <System>
        <Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-FailoverClustering" Guid="{BAF908EA-3421-4CA9-9B84-6689B8C6F85F}" />
        <EventID>1558</EventID>
        <Version>0</Version>
        <Level>3</Level>
        <Task>42</Task>
        <Opcode>0</Opcode>
        <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords>
        <TimeCreated SystemTime="2014-03-04T17:54:55.498842300Z" />
        <EventRecordID>14139</EventRecordID>
        <Correlation />
        <Execution ProcessID="1684" ThreadID="2180" />
        <Channel>System</Channel>
        <Computer>ServerDB02.domain.com</Computer>
        <Security UserID="S-1-5-18" />
      </System>
      <EventData>
        <Data Name="NodeName">ServerDB02</Data>
      </EventData>
    </Event>
    We don't know if this can happen again, what if this happens on disk with data?! We don't know if this is related to the virtual disk sharing technology or anything related to virtualization, but I'm asking here to find out if it is a possibility.
    Any ideas are appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Eduardo Rojas

    Hi,
    Please refer to the following link:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2013/03/21/virtual-machine-guest-clustering-with-windows-server-2012-become-a-virtualization-expert-in-20-days-part-14-of-20.aspx#.Ux172HnxtNA
    Best Regards,
    Vincent Wu
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  • Can Windows Server Backup spread a single backup job across multiple disks if they are not set up as a virtual disk?

    This may be a dumb question, but I can't seem to find any definitive information after having done many, many searches.  Short question is - can Windows Server Backup spread a single backup job across multiple disks if they are not in a storage
    pool or some other RAID/JBOD structure?
    Background:
    I'm running Server 2012 Essentials with all Windows Updates installed.  I have been backing up approx 2.8TB of data (Bare Metal Recovery, C:, S: (shared folders), and system reserved) for the past year+ onto a storage pool made up of two-2TB external
    USB drives.  Backup is slow (takes approx 1.5 days to complete), but generally works.  Not surprisingly I was constantly getting capacity low messages so I decided to increase my backup storage pool by adding a 3TB drive and another spare 750GB drive
    for a total of 7.75TB.  Instead of having four separate external USB enclosures, I bot a 4-bay enclosure - Startech.com model #S3540BU33E to simplify this (or so I thought!).
    The first problem I had was adding the two new drives to the existing storage pool. I think that is because the Startech uses a JMicron USB controller that reports identical uniqueid's for all drives so only one shows up in the GUI interface for creating storage
    pools. After doing research on this, I set up a new storage pool and virtual disk using all four drives via Powershell and thought I was good. However, when the backup ran, it failed after filling the first drive, saying there was no remaining capacity. In
    reality there were three remaining empty drives and there storage pool reported almost 5TB of avail capacity. I assumed this was due to the identical uniqueid issue so I decided to try a different tactic.
    Instead of using a storage pool that combines all four disks into one virtual disk, I just added each of them to Windows Server Backup as individual drives thinking it would manage them collectively. I.e., when a drive filled up during a particular backup,
    it would just start using the next drive and so on. Apparently this was a foolish assumption because the backup failed again as soon as the first disk filled up.
    So now I don't know if this is still an issue with the identical uniqueid's or if Server Backup actually can't spread a single backup across multiple individual drives that aren't in a pool or other virtual disk implementation. Hence, my original question.
    My guess is that it does *not* spread them across individual disks, but I just wanted to get confirmation.
    Thanks

    Mandy,
    Thank you for following up on my question.
    Unfortunately the article you referenced doesn't address what I am trying to accomplish.
    The article focuses on saving the same backup job to multiple disks and rotating the disks between on and offsite for enhanced protection.  However, it still requires that an individual backup job fits on a single disk.
    What I am trying to determine is if a single backup job can span across more than one physical disk (during the backup process) without those physical disks being in some type of virtual disk implementation (e.g., storage pool, RAID, etc.).
    Thanks,
    Gerry

  • Disk Manager/Virtual Disk Manager Problem

    I have an apparently working NAS drive that I can see, read. write to, and whatever as normal.
    However backup/restore software cannot find the drive while Disk Manager shows it as "unknown" and "Not initialised" and Virtual Disk Manager reports it as "The Device is not Ready!"
    Obviously with Virtual Disk Manager not finding it I cannot initiate it.
    As I need to access the drive with a backup and restore prog does anyone know where I can go from here?

    Hi,
    Did you run Windows in a VM?
    Please start virtual disk service and set its startup type as "Automatically".
    Afterward, re-connect the drive into the computer for test. Remember to right click the disk and click to initialize disk.
    If the issue still persists, please upload the disk management snapshot as below:
    Karen Hu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Virtual disk consistency error due to the Linux virtual machine virtualization host location ?

    
    Environment
    - windows server 2012 r2 Hyper-v failover clustering configuration
    Installing CentOS 6.5 as a guest OS
    Virtual machine is up on clustering , that information and virtual disk in the CSV .for the virtual machine .
    1 of 1 showed the data virtualization in a virtual machine when there is a CentOS virtual machine on a host , the data of one of the virtual machine does not look after migrating to twice the virtualization host .
    Do you have any experiences you had one of the above ? The workaround ?

    Hi Leon,
    Thank you for your question.
    I am trying to involve someone familiar with this topic to further look at this issue. There might be some time delay. Appreciate your patience.
    Thank you for your understanding and support.
    Best Regards
    Jeremy Wu

  • There is no more space for virtual disk ServerName_2.vmdk. You might be able to continue this session by freeing disk space on the relevant volume, and clicking Retry. Click Cancel to terminate this session.   Time: 30/05/2014 1:16:20 AM

    Recently, our mail server crashed at about 7pm one night, with the error 'There is no more space for virtual disk ServerName_2.vmdk. You might be able to continue this session by freeing disk space on the relevant volume, and clicking Retry. Click Cancel to terminate this session.'
    When we click Retry, the server starts up OK.
    There are no snapshots listed in Snapshot manager for any of the virtual machines on the host.
    There is also free disk space available on the host and for the VM with the disk errors.
    This happened at least three more times, often at bad times. Each time, we were able to click 'Retry' and the disk/system would allow the VM to start-up successfully.
    I checked the Forums, the VMware support articles and the internet as I had not seen this problem before. I have completed the VSphere 5.1 - Fast Track course and this issue was NOT covered in the training.
    Most of the advice on-line and even that on the VMware web-site was pointing to snapshots being the cause of this issue. There are no snapshots enabled and I cannot see evidence of snapshots ever being used.
    - We are running VMware vsphere (5.1.0) and there are (were) 4 virtual machines running on the ESX host. We are using the free version of VMware/ESXi.
    - The Hard disk types we are using for this Virtual Machine are 'Thin Provisioned'.
    - There are 4 [Thin Provisioned] Hard Disks for this virtual machine.
    - There are 6 CPUs
    - There is 20GB of RAM (memory)
    - The VM is running Windows Server 2008 R2 as the guest/VM operating system. It is an Exchange 2010 SP1 mail server. There is plenty of available disk space on all the drives. The [Exchange] log files are cleaned out regularly (automated).
    I decided to move one of our non-critical servers off this host and on to another host to see if this helped the problem. This took quite some time, as we are not using HA or vmotion, nor do we have VCenter Server...nonetheless, I finally managed to get the non-critical server on to another host (n.b. This was a much smaller machine with less virtual resources assigned to it).
    After moving the non-critical server off this host, we decided to monitor the Host and see if the issue resolved itself.
    I checked the host about 6-10 times a day, from first thing in the morning till last thing at night - monitoring the performance of not only the Virtual Machine, but the ESXi host also.
    There were no adverse performance issues. The only thing I did note, was in the Summary page on the ESX Host, under Storage, was If I right-clicked on the datastore and clicked refresh, then the free disk space would drop (ie from 140GB to 125GB).
    After monitoring the host and VM for about 2 weeks, we did NOT have another instance of the above error.
    Sorry for the long winded post, but I wanted to give as much detail given this error has been raised before and snapshots are usually blamed as the cause.
    My question is this:
    If the ESX host had plenty of available disk capacity and there were no snapshots enabled on the VM (or any other VM's on the same host), then why did our Virtual machine crash with the error that 'there is not more space for virtual disk Servername_2.vmdk'?
    How do we prevent this issue from happening if we don't know the underlying cause?
    I would greatly appreciate any advice or suggestions.
    If I have not provided enough info on the specs or environment, please let me know and I will provide more information.
    Thanks all,
    Kurt

    The type of storage is really based on your requirements, and your ability to withstand downtime.
    iSCSI as you are using with a NAS such as Synology or QNAP.  NAS Selector - Support - Synology - Network Attached Storage (NAS)
    I wouldn't use iSCSI for Exchange or any database.  It's a bit slow.
    Do you have a single physical host?  Then I'd probably to an external direct attached storage.  This would be a card inserted in your host server that gives you multilane SAS/SATA connectivity (www.techcable.com/SAS-SATA/SAS-SATA.pps) and an external disk enclosure/array.
    For multiple hosts to a single array, I recommend a fibre channel connection to a FC capable switch, and on to a FC connected array.
    We used to use a HP P2000 (on old G1), but it's since been retired.  Worked pretty well once firmware was upgraded.  http://www8.hp.com/us/en/products/disk-storage/product-detail.html?oid=4118559#!tab=features.  They can be connected via iSCSI, Fibre Channel or 6GB SAS so they are flexible and reasonably priced.
    Recommendations:
         Use RAID 6 with your large disk arrays.  With large disks there is a measurable failure rate when rebuilding a failed RAID5 array based on MTBF.
         Use smaller 15K disks in RAID 0+1 for speed on databases/Exchange.
         Use slower 7.2K disks in RAID6 for file storage.
    We are a small hospital and we have 3 VMware servers with dual CNA (FC and Ethernet in a single twinax cable) connections to 2 redundant Cisco Nexus 5K switches and then 4 Fibre Channel connections to an EMC VNX 5300.  It's extremely fast with about 50 virtual servers, but was quite an investment.  One thing we don't have to worry about is down time.  If there ever is an equipment failure, we have redundant everything, including power split between two UPSs.
    Our VNX has 3 tiers of performance.  3 100GB SSD "Fast Cache" in RAID 1 with hot spare, to keep the most used data ready, but it's not really a tier, however one could be built utilizing the same disks.  A second tier is performance tier with a 8 600GB RAID 0+1 and hot spare.  The third is a bunch of 7.2K 3TB disks in RAID6.  The VNX autotiers, placing data on disks depending on where it's needed.  The volumes are sliced and diced automatically in the background to make this happen and we never have to touch it.  I used a demo of Solarwinds Storage Manager to monitor performance for a while and the utilization was always low, meaning all data access was fast, througout the day.
    D

  • Iscsi virtual disk wizard shows no servers (and no volumes)

    Hi, in windows 2012 DataCenter, I installed the Iscsi target role and went on to set an iscsi disk.
    but when launching "new Iscsi virtual disk" wizard (Server Manager\File and Storage Services\iSCSI -> new iscsi virtual disk)
    I see no servers in list (upper windows) and instead it just states "no eligible servers are available".
    it happens on both of my servers.. not just one..
    anyone has any idea?

    Sorry, I'm I little bit confused.
    Let me explain my intentions:
    I have 2 servers (hosts) but no NAS. at first I've configured a Hyper-v replica between 2 VMs - which has worked perfectly. then, I wanted to automate the procedure of the failover from the primary VM to its replica.
    I realized that for that I need to use the cluster features.
    now, since a cluster demands the VMs to reside on shared storage, I thought I'll trick it into thinking that the storage is shared while it's really local. (that is what the "Iscsi target server" is for right? sharing a portion of the local disk to seem as
    connected via Iscsi).
    anyway, maybe my thinking is wrong, or maybe there is a different way to do that, but all I really need is for the replica failover process to be automated.
    Thanks again, Gil.

  • Expand virtual disk on sun storage 6140

    I have configured sun storage 6140, but volume is %100.
    How could i expand virtual disk without data lose?
    How could i add any disk storage pool?
    thanks..
    regards..

    Hi Dan,
    Do you mean that you cannot mount the Journal virtual drives on the Storage Space? Please run the command “Get-VirtualDisk” to check the status of the virtual disk.
    You could run the command below to make your storage space read-only.
    Get-VirtualDisk –Friendlyname name_of_your_space | Get-Disk | Set-Disk –IsReadOnly $true
    For more detailed information, you could refer to the article below:
    Storage Spaces Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/11382.storage-spaces-frequently-asked-questions-faq.aspx#What_happens_if_I_run_out_of_physical_capacity_on_a_thinly_provisioned_storage_space
    Best Regards,
    Mandy 
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

  • Using a ZFS volume with encryption on as the Virtual disk in a Sparc VM

    Hi guys,
    Working my way through understanding how virtualization works in VM for Sparc. One question I thought of deals with having encryption turned on in a ZFS volume. If I create a volume with encryption ON, and then attach that volume as the sole virtual disk in a guest domain, will the virtualization still work? Has anyone else dealt with a scenario like this? I'm about to try it now, I'll report back with my findings.

    From my understanding, if you create a ZFS disk with encryption ON, mount it on Solaris, and after that present that to the VM, you should not have problems. The encryption will work between the volume and Solaris. To the guest vm, it should be transparent.

  • Volume as install disk for Guest Domain and Live Upgrade

    Hi Folks,
    I am new to LDOMs and have some questions - any pointers, examples would be much appreciated:
    (1) With support for volumes to be used as whole disks added in LDOM release 1.0.3, can we export a whole LUN under either VERITAS DMP or mpxio control to guest domain and install Solaris on it ? Any gotchas or special config required to do this ?
    (2) Can Solaris Live Upgrade be used with Guest LDOMs ? or is this ability limited to Control Domains ?
    Thanks

    The answer to your #1 question is YES.
    Here's my mpxio enabled device.
    non-STMS device name STMS device name
    /dev/rdsk/c2t50060E8010029B33d16 /dev/rdsk/c4t4849544143484920373730313036373530303136d0
    /dev/rdsk/c3t50060E8010029B37d16 /dev/rdsk/c4t4849544143484920373730313036373530303136d0
    create the virtual disk using slice 2
    ldm add-vdsdev /dev/dsk/c4t4849544143484920373730313036373530303136d0s2 77bootdisk@primary-vds01
    add the virtual disk to the guest domain
    ldm add-vdisk apps bootdisk@primary-vds01 ldom1
    the virtual disk will be imprted as c0d0 which is the whole lun itself.
    bind, start ldom 1 and install OS (i used jumpstart) and it partitioned the boot disk c0d0 as / 15GB, swap the remaining space (10GB)
    when you run format, print command on both guest and primary domain on this disk you'll see the same slice/size information
    Part Tag Flag Cylinders Size Blocks
    0 root wm 543 - 1362 15.01GB (820/0/0) 31488000
    1 swap wu 0 - 542 9.94GB (543/0/0) 20851200
    2 backup wm 0 - 1362 24.96GB (1363/0/0) 52339200
    3 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    4 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    5 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    6 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    7 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    I havent used DMP but HDLM (Hitachi Dynamic link manager) seems not supported by ldom as i cannot make it work :(
    I have no answer on your next question unfortunately.

  • Disk Utilty - what is difference between single volume and single partition

    In Disk Utility I can, should I wish, format a drive by using Erase to create a single volume. Also in Disk Utility, I have the option to use Partition to create one (or more) partition.
    What is the difference between a volume and a single partition?
    What are their relative merits?
    In what circumstances would I want to create a single partition instead of a volume?
    Disk Utility also prompts me to name the volume or partition. From experience, what would you suggest as a suitable name and where is this information subsequently used?

    A "volume" or "partition" are the same thing. The subject of using partitions has been covered many times on the forums. Do some searching and you'll find quite a lot of information. Also try doing some Google searching.

  • I need help with boot camp. "Back up the disk and use Disk Utility to format it as a single Mac OS Extended (Journaled) volume. Restore your information to the disk and try using Boot Camp Assistant again."

    This message appears every time I try to partition my disk:
    "Back up the disk and use Disk Utility to format it as a single Mac OS Extended (Journaled) volume. Restore your information to the disk and try using Boot Camp Assistant again."
    I verified my Macintosh HD disk on Disk utility and then tried to repair it, but I am unable to click the repair button.
    It says it's not available because the startup disk is selected.
    I don't know what to do or how to go about both these problems.
    Please, any suggestions?

    This message appears every time I try to partition my disk:
    "Back up the disk and use Disk Utility to format it as a single Mac OS Extended (Journaled) volume. Restore your information to the disk and try using Boot Camp Assistant again."
    I verified my Macintosh HD disk on Disk utility and then tried to repair it, but I am unable to click the repair button.
    It says it's not available because the startup disk is selected.
    I don't know what to do or how to go about both these problems.
    Please, any suggestions?

  • " the volume for (file name) cannot be found. Insert the disk or connect to the server volume and wait for it to appear on the desktop, then try again."

    I get an error message in iPhoto when I click on thumbnails of pictures in certain albums. It reads 'the volume for "(file name)" cannot be found. Insert the disk or connect to the server volume and wait for it to appear on the desktop, then try again.'  What does this mean and how do I fix it?

    It means that you imported the files in Referenced mode and have now remvoed them from the Mac. Put the disk or card back.
    For more on iPhoto and file management see this User Tip:
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-6361

  • Format External Drive for HFS+ volume and FAT32 volume with Disk Utility

    I just bought a Seagate 1tb external drive from OWC and I want to partition it into a HFS+ (journaled I assume) volume and a NTFS volume. Objective: To manually backup critical folders from my wife’s Dell (running XP) to the NTFS volume and critical Mac folders from my PowerBookG4 to the HFS volume.
    My plan was to have my Mac (10.4.11) do the partitioning into a 350gb FAT32 volume for Windows and a 650gb HFS+ volume for Mac – then take the external drive to the Dell and have the Dell reformat the 350gb FAT drive to NTFS.
    First question – Is this possible overall?
    Second question – I haven’t been able to get my Disk Utility on my Mac to do the initial partitioning into one HFS volume and one FAT32 volume the way I want it. Is this step possible?
    I’m happy to be more specific about the steps I’ve taken if the basic plan is good. From what I’ve found in some forums so far, I think I’m on the right track but am unable to execute it. Thank you.

    Thank you Limnos for all your help. Last night I tried again and it worked! I’ not totally sure on what I did right but:
    • Both volumes on the new ext. driver were HFS (from my last attempt the other day) so I looked into a simple erase of one partition/volume into a different format, but DU did not offer a way of erasing it into MS-DOS(FAT32). But I think I did a simple HFS erase anyway of the volume I wanted to format to FAT32. There was nothing “in” that volume because this was a new external drive but I figured it could not hurt anything.
    • So then, I think I went back to Partition, locked the partition/volume that I wanted to keep in HFS+ for my Mac files, and (re)partitioned the other just erased volume to MS-DOS. I think I did it under the MBR option.
    • It worked! Not sure why but my Mac recognized both volumes one as HFS, the other as FAT32. Maybe someone will find this useful some day!!
    • Then, I hooked up the drive to my work Dell, the Dell found only the FAT32 drive (as expected), and I executed a short simple easy command I found on ehow.com (search for ‘convert FAT32 to NTFS’) to make that volume NTFS.
    Thanks again Limnos and everyone else!

Maybe you are looking for